Samsung Galaxy A Serie
Prozessor: unknown, Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, Mediatek Dimensity 700, Mediatek Mediatek Helio G80, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 695 5G, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 720G, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 730, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 750G 5G, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 778G 5G, Samsung Exynos 850, Samsung Exynos Exynos 1280Grafikkarte: unknown, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, Imagination PowerVR GE8320, Qualcomm Adreno 618, Qualcomm Adreno 619, Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Bildschirm: 6.40 Zoll, 6.50 Zoll, 6.60 Zoll, 6.70 Zoll
Gewicht: 0.179kg, 0.181kg, 0.185kg, 0.186kg, 0.189kg, 0.193kg, 0.195kg, 0.197kg, 0.203kg, 0.205kg
Preis: 169, 170, 179, 189, 229, 299, 369, 409, 429, 449, 469, 600 Euro
Durchschnitt von 750 Bewertungen (aus 1601 Tests)
Samsung Galaxy A71
Samsung stellte 2020 gleich zwei Mid-Range-Geräte vor, das Samsung Galaxy A51 und das A71. Während beide einen fantastischen Full-HD+ Super-AMOLED-Infinity-O-Bildschirm haben, unterscheiden sich die Bildschirmgrößen. Das Galaxy A71 hat ganze 6,7 Zoll Bildschirmoberfläche, das Galaxy A51 hingegen 6,5 Zoll. Trotz des größeren Displays wird das glatte und elegant gekrümmte Displaydesign des Samsung Galaxy A71 perfekt in jede Hand passen. Das A71 und das A51 haben ihre Unterschiede, doch beide liefern schärfere und bessere Blickwinkel. Beide Modelle liefern zweifellos ein großartiges Erlebnis, da sie mit OLEDs patentiertem Kontrast und Lebhaftigheit arbeiten. Einige meinen, das Galaxy A71 sei für die jüngere Generation gedacht, welche die meiste Zeit Online verbringt und dabei große Maßen an Videos produziert und konsumiert.
Nicht nur das Display, besonders die Kameras des Galaxy A71 verdienen Beachtung. Dieses Modell verfügt über ein 64-MP-Hauptkamera, eine 123° 12-MP-Ultra-Weitwinkelkamera, eine 5-MP-Makrokamera und eine 5-MP-Kamera für Schärfentiefe. Die Ultra-Weitwinkelkamera ermöglicht einen weiteren Blickwinkel, sie wirkt gewöhnlich wie das menschliche Auge. Die Makrokamera bringt winzige Details in den Vordergrund und erschafft ein hochwertiges Nutzererlebnis. Ob man ein Close-Up oder eine Weitwinkelaufnahme möchte, das A71 hat mit seinen Kameras alles unter Kontrolle. Sogar ein Bokeh-Effekt oder eine Nachtaufnahme wäre mit dem Samsung Galaxy A71 kein Problem mehr. Die äußerst stabile Kamera liefert unglaublich geschmeidige Live-Videos, sogar bei wilden Abenteuern. Abgesehen von der Kamera glänzt das Samsung Galaxy A71 auch im Akku-Bereich. Während das bekannte Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus und das Galaxy Note 10 Plus jeweils über 4100 mAh bzw. 4300 mAh verfügten, steigerte das Galaxy A71 die Kapazität auf 4500 mAh.
Mit seiner hochwertigen Glanzoberfläche ist das Samsung Galaxy A71 leichter zu handhaben, und das rhythmische Muster fügt den bunten Varianten eine persönliche Note zu. Das A71 ist in drei Farben erhältlich, nämlich Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Silver und Prism Crush Blue. Das Galaxy A71 ist außerdem mit einem Fingerabdruck-Leser ausgestattet, der für Bequemlichkeit hübsch unter das Display eingebaut wurde. Dieses Modell bietet auch Gesichtserkennung an, um es zu entsperren. Allerdings ist das Galaxy A71 nicht wasserfest, was für Fans von Wassersportarten keine gute Neuigkeit ist. Darüber hinaus unterstützt das Galaxy A71 kein kabelloses Laden. Obwohl es Vor- und Nachteil hat, platziert sich das Samsung Galaxy A71 dennoch gut auf dem Markt.
Hands-on-Artikel von Jagadisa Rajarathnam
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A71Prozessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 730
Grafikkarte: Qualcomm Adreno 618
Bildschirm: 6.70 Zoll, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.179kg
Preis: 469 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Ein 6,7 Zoll großes Super-AMOLED-Display, das Achtkern-SoC Snapdragon 730 und eine Vierfachkamera mit 64 MP Auflösung: Samsungs neues Mittelklasse-Smartphone Galaxy A71 stapelt weder bei Formfaktor noch Ausstattung tief. Ob das ausreicht, um die Konkurrenz das Fürchten zu lehren, zeigt unser Test.
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A71 (2020) überzeugte im Test. Der 6,7-Zoll-Bildschirm erwies sich als sehr hell, dank OLED kontrastreich und mit starkem Farbumfang – kommt ohne Notch zudem noch besser als beim Vorgänger zur Geltung. Für alle, die ein großes Galaxy mit tollem OLED-Display sowie guter Technik suchen und beim Fotografieren gerne mit Ultraweitwinkelaufnahmen spielen, ist das Galaxy A71 ein möglicher Preistipp.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A71 (2020) überzeugte im Test. Der 6,7-Zoll-Bildschirm erwies sich als sehr hell, dank OLED kontrastreich und mit starkem Farbumfang – kommt ohne Notch zudem noch besser als beim Vorgänger zur Geltung. Für alle, die ein großes Galaxy mit tollem OLED-Display sowie guter Technik suchen und beim Fotografieren gerne mit Ultraweitwinkelaufnahmen spielen, ist das Galaxy A71 ein möglicher Preistipp.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A71 (2020) überzeugte im Test. Der 6,7-Zoll-Bildschirm erwies sich als sehr hell, dank OLED kontrastreich und mit starkem Farbumfang – kommt ohne Notch zudem noch besser als beim Vorgänger zur Geltung. Für alle, die ein großes Galaxy mit tollem OLED-Display sowie guter Technik suchen und beim Fotografieren gerne mit Ultraweitwinkelaufnahmen spielen, ist das Galaxy A71 ein möglicher Preistipp.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A71 (2020) überzeugte im Test. Der 6,7-Zoll-Bildschirm erwies sich als sehr hell, dank OLED kontrastreich und mit starkem Farbumfang – kommt ohne Notch zudem noch besser als beim Vorgänger zur Geltung. Für alle, die ein großes Galaxy mit tollem OLED-Display sowie guter Technik suchen und beim Fotografieren gerne mit Ultraweitwinkelaufnahmen spielen, ist das Galaxy A71 ein möglicher Preistipp.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Computerbild Archive.org version
Das Galaxy A71 (2020) überzeugte im Test. Der 6,7-Zoll-Bildschirm erwies sich als sehr hell, dank OLED kontrastreich und mit starkem Farbumfang – kommt ohne Notch zudem noch besser als beim Vorgänger zur Geltung. Für alle, die ein großes Galaxy mit tollem OLED-Display sowie guter Technik suchen und beim Fotografieren gerne mit Ultraweitwinkelaufnahmen spielen, ist das Galaxy A71 ein möglicher Preistipp.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.11.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Computerbild Archive.org version
Das Galaxy A71 (2020) überzeugte im Test. Der 6,7-Zoll-Bildschirm erwies sich als sehr hell, dank OLED kontrastreich und mit starkem Farbumfang – kommt ohne Notch zudem noch besser als beim Vorgänger zur Geltung. Für alle, die ein großes Galaxy mit tollem OLED-Display sowie guter Technik suchen und beim Fotografieren gerne mit Ultraweitwinkelaufnahmen spielen, ist das Galaxy A71 ein möglicher Preistipp.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.11.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Tech Stage Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A71 ist ein gutes Smartphone ohne nennenswerte Highlights – solide trifft es wohl ganz gut. Positiv machen sich Display, Akku, Speicher und Leistung des Gerätes bemerkbar, vor allem zu einem im Vergleich zur überzogenen UVP deutlich niedrigeren Straßenpreis von inzwischen unter 370 Euro.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.05.2020
Quelle: Tech Stage Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A71 ist ein gutes Smartphone ohne nennenswerte Highlights – solide trifft es wohl ganz gut. Positiv machen sich Display, Akku, Speicher und Leistung des Gerätes bemerkbar, vor allem zu einem im Vergleich zur überzogenen UVP deutlich niedrigeren Straßenpreis von inzwischen unter 370 Euro.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.05.2020
Quelle: Computerbild Archive.org version
Das Galaxy A71 (2020) überzeugte im Test. Der 6,7-Zoll-Bildschirm erwies sich als sehr hell, dank OLED kontrastreich und mit starkem Farbumfang – kommt ohne Notch zudem noch besser als beim Vorgänger zur Geltung. Für alle, die ein großes Galaxy mit tollem OLED-Display sowie guter Technik suchen und beim Fotografieren gerne mit Ultraweitwinkelaufnahmen spielen, ist das Galaxy A71 ein möglicher Preistipp.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Computerbild Archive.org version
Das Galaxy A71 (2020) überzeugte im Test. Der 6,7-Zoll-Bildschirm erwies sich als sehr hell, dank OLED kontrastreich und mit starkem Farbumfang – kommt ohne Notch zudem noch besser als beim Vorgänger zur Geltung. Für alle, die ein großes Galaxy mit tollem OLED-Display sowie guter Technik suchen und beim Fotografieren gerne mit Ultraweitwinkelaufnahmen spielen, ist das Galaxy A71 ein möglicher Preistipp.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net Archive.org version
Für das Samsung Galaxy A71 wird ein ganz schön hoher Preis aufgerufen: zwei Faktoren rechtfertigen diesen Preisen bzw. passen in diese Preisklasse – zwei Faktoren sind dann wieder auf Niveau des „Samsung-Preis-Leistung“. So ist das Display sehr gelungen und die Größe für mich noch angenehm.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net Archive.org version
Für das Samsung Galaxy A71 wird ein ganz schön hoher Preis aufgerufen: zwei Faktoren rechtfertigen diesen Preisen bzw. passen in diese Preisklasse – zwei Faktoren sind dann wieder auf Niveau des „Samsung-Preis-Leistung“. So ist das Display sehr gelungen und die Größe für mich noch angenehm.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Inside Handy Archive.org version
Mit einem Preis von 380 Euro bildet das Galaxy A71 die Spitze von Samsungs 2020er Mittelklasse. Für diesen Preis erhältst du ein solides Smartphone ohne grobe Schnitzer. Besonderes Highlight in der Mittelklasse ist das wirklich gute AMOLED-Display mit integriertem Fingerabdrucksensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Inside Handy Archive.org version
Mit einem Preis von 380 Euro bildet das Galaxy A71 die Spitze von Samsungs 2020er Mittelklasse. Für diesen Preis erhältst du ein solides Smartphone ohne grobe Schnitzer. Besonderes Highlight in der Mittelklasse ist das wirklich gute AMOLED-Display mit integriertem Fingerabdrucksensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: A1 Blog Archive.org version
So stellt man sich Mittelklasse im Jahr 2020 vor: Großes, hochauflösendes Display, lange Akkulaufzeit, gute Performance und brauchbare Kamera. Es gibt kaum etwas, dem das Galaxy A71 nicht gewachsen wäre – bis auf den Schutz vor Nässe spricht eigentlich kaum etwas gegen dieses Modell.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.02.2020
Quelle: A1 Blog Archive.org version
So stellt man sich Mittelklasse im Jahr 2020 vor: Großes, hochauflösendes Display, lange Akkulaufzeit, gute Performance und brauchbare Kamera. Es gibt kaum etwas, dem das Galaxy A71 nicht gewachsen wäre – bis auf den Schutz vor Nässe spricht eigentlich kaum etwas gegen dieses Modell.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.02.2020
Quelle: Curved Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A71 kann in den meisten Punkten positiv überzeugen. Gerade der schnellere Prozessor sowie das bessere Kamera-Setup dürften das Smartphone gegenüber dem Galaxy A70 für viele interessant machen, die sich derzeit nach einem neuen Mittelklasse-Gerät umsehen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.02.2020
Quelle: Curved Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A71 kann in den meisten Punkten positiv überzeugen. Gerade der schnellere Prozessor sowie das bessere Kamera-Setup dürften das Smartphone gegenüber dem Galaxy A70 für viele interessant machen, die sich derzeit nach einem neuen Mittelklasse-Gerät umsehen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.02.2020
Quelle: Blick Archive.org version
Zum Preis von 469 Franken bietet Samsung beim Galaxy A71 ein komplettes Paket, das sich einerseits an junge, noch nicht so kaufkräftige Kunden richtet. Andererseits ist es für alle interessant, die an Design, Akkulaufzeit, grossem Screen und vielen Kamerafeatures interessiert sind.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.01.2020
Quelle: Blick Archive.org version
Zum Preis von 469 Franken bietet Samsung beim Galaxy A71 ein komplettes Paket, das sich einerseits an junge, noch nicht so kaufkräftige Kunden richtet. Andererseits ist es für alle interessant, die an Design, Akkulaufzeit, grossem Screen und vielen Kamerafeatures interessiert sind.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.01.2020
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Ricks Tech
In this video im opening up a Samsung Galaxy A71 that has been Water Damaged, at this point i dont have a fix for it but i give some pointers on what to look for and also what you might be able to fix up to get it going again
Support, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.07.2022
Quelle: Ricks Tech
In this video im opening up a Samsung Galaxy A71 that has been Water Damaged, at this point i dont have a fix for it but i give some pointers on what to look for and also what you might be able to fix up to get it going again
Support, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.07.2022
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE
The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find today.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE
The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find today.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a solid mid-range device that competes well with others in its class. It offers an excellent screen with solid battery life and speedy performance. At half the cost of flagships, you'd hardly know it's not a top-flight phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.10.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 700%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a solid mid-range device that competes well with others in its class. It offers an excellent screen with solid battery life and speedy performance. At half the cost of flagships, you'd hardly know it's not a top-flight phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.10.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 700%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed for 2020, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find in 2020.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.09.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed for 2020, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find in 2020.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.09.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Ausdroid EN→DE Archive.org version
If that’s above your budget and you were considering the A51 instead, don’t. I tried the A51 for a day and the A70/A71 are much more responsive, smooth and speedy to use compared to A51 model. The A70/A71 also have a vastly better in screen fingerprint reader than the A51. Australian stock of the Samsung A70 is still being sold by Mobileciti for $549.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.07.2020
Quelle: Ausdroid EN→DE Archive.org version
If that’s above your budget and you were considering the A51 instead, don’t. I tried the A51 for a day and the A70/A71 are much more responsive, smooth and speedy to use compared to A51 model. The A70/A71 also have a vastly better in screen fingerprint reader than the A51. Australian stock of the Samsung A70 is still being sold by Mobileciti for $549.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.07.2020
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A71 offers most of what's great about flagship Samsung phones for a lower price. Unless top-of-the-line features and specs are absolutely needed, this is arguably the perfect Android smartphone for most people, as it should check the necessary boxes for all but the most hardcore Android users. It offers solid performance, long battery life, plenty of camera options and even a headphone jack, while possible downsides for some may be its plastic back, mediocre single speaker and its tall screen aspect ratio.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A71 offers most of what's great about flagship Samsung phones for a lower price. Unless top-of-the-line features and specs are absolutely needed, this is arguably the perfect Android smartphone for most people, as it should check the necessary boxes for all but the most hardcore Android users. It offers solid performance, long battery life, plenty of camera options and even a headphone jack, while possible downsides for some may be its plastic back, mediocre single speaker and its tall screen aspect ratio.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Mobile Syrup EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A71 was a solid smartphone that offers a top-tier performance, especially considering it’s a mid-range handset. While my current favourite smartphone on the market is the S20+, the A71 delivered an experience that Is strikingly similar for a fraction of the cost.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Mobile Syrup EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A71 was a solid smartphone that offers a top-tier performance, especially considering it’s a mid-range handset. While my current favourite smartphone on the market is the S20+, the A71 delivered an experience that Is strikingly similar for a fraction of the cost.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed for 2020, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find in 2020.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed for 2020, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find in 2020.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A71’s front camera is capable of capturing decent selfie images and video in most conditions. Its single-lens fixed-focus camera is not quite on the same level as current high-end devices with autofocus-systems and more efficient stabilization, but the Samsung is one of the better mid-rangers we have tested under our Selfie protocol. This said, if you are after top-end front camera performance in a mid-range device, the Huawei nova 6 5G currently remains your best option.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.05.2020
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A71’s front camera is capable of capturing decent selfie images and video in most conditions. Its single-lens fixed-focus camera is not quite on the same level as current high-end devices with autofocus-systems and more efficient stabilization, but the Samsung is one of the better mid-rangers we have tested under our Selfie protocol. This said, if you are after top-end front camera performance in a mid-range device, the Huawei nova 6 5G currently remains your best option.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.05.2020
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE Archive.org version
While Samsung’s mid-range A-series devices aren’t meant to rival the manufacturer’s excellent photography of its flagship models, the new A71 doesn’t really improve on the A9 we tested a year ago. From both the main and ultra-wide cameras you can expect well-exposed images in good light, excellent dynamic range and well-saturated color, but blue color casts can also make outdoor images disappointing.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.04.2020
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE Archive.org version
While Samsung’s mid-range A-series devices aren’t meant to rival the manufacturer’s excellent photography of its flagship models, the new A71 doesn’t really improve on the A9 we tested a year ago. From both the main and ultra-wide cameras you can expect well-exposed images in good light, excellent dynamic range and well-saturated color, but blue color casts can also make outdoor images disappointing.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.04.2020
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE Archive.org version
For RM1799, I think the Galaxy A71 is one of the better mid-range devices for mobile gaming. Hardcore mobile gamers are always looking for the best tech specs for the glory of graphics and this phone is no exception. Let me just say this - as a PC gamer and a big fan of mobile gaming phones, I was genuinely impressed with how the Galaxy A71 handled mobile gaming, so it might do the same for you too.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2020
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE Archive.org version
For RM1799, I think the Galaxy A71 is one of the better mid-range devices for mobile gaming. Hardcore mobile gamers are always looking for the best tech specs for the glory of graphics and this phone is no exception. Let me just say this - as a PC gamer and a big fan of mobile gaming phones, I was genuinely impressed with how the Galaxy A71 handled mobile gaming, so it might do the same for you too.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2020
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE Archive.org version
We loved the Galaxy A70, and the Galaxy A71 brings some neat upgrades. Its performance is notably better thanks to the newer Snapdragon chip, the display has been upgraded to an Infinity-O panel, there’s a higher-resolution main camera and a macro camera at the back, and you get Android 10 and One UI 2.0 out of the box. The A71’s design is excellent, and there’s not a lot it doesn’t do well.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.03.2020
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE Archive.org version
We loved the Galaxy A70, and the Galaxy A71 brings some neat upgrades. Its performance is notably better thanks to the newer Snapdragon chip, the display has been upgraded to an Infinity-O panel, there’s a higher-resolution main camera and a macro camera at the back, and you get Android 10 and One UI 2.0 out of the box. The A71’s design is excellent, and there’s not a lot it doesn’t do well.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.03.2020
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A71 is an excellent overall smartphone with touches of what makes Samsung flagships great. It’s a gorgeous device with some of the best mid-range hardware plus a set of decent shooters to boot.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.02.2020
Quelle: Gogi.in EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A71 is another mid-premium smartphone powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 octa core processor and packed with quad cameras (64MP Primary), 4500 mAh battery with 25W fast charging support and priced at Rs. 29,999.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88%
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A71 is an excellent overall smartphone with touches of what makes Samsung flagships great. It’s a gorgeous device with some of the best mid-range hardware plus a set of decent shooters to boot.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.02.2020
Quelle: Gogi.in EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A71 is another mid-premium smartphone powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 octa core processor and packed with quad cameras (64MP Primary), 4500 mAh battery with 25W fast charging support and priced at Rs. 29,999.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88%
Quelle: NLT EN→DE Archive.org version
All in all, I am unable to recommend one smartphone over the other. They both do share some similarities, but the price scales alongside the performance, camera, and overall battery capacity. For example, if you want to play games on your smartphone – then the Galaxy A71 is great. Else, the Galaxy A51 is fine too.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.02.2020
Quelle: NLT EN→DE Archive.org version
All in all, I am unable to recommend one smartphone over the other. They both do share some similarities, but the price scales alongside the performance, camera, and overall battery capacity. For example, if you want to play games on your smartphone – then the Galaxy A71 is great. Else, the Galaxy A51 is fine too.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.02.2020
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
With Xiaomi and Realme aggressively launching phones with flagship-grade specs, it's a tough job being a mid-ranger these days. We do believe the A71 has a bright future though, as its price will soon go down, while many carriers will subsidize it enough to make it an attractive purchase.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
With Xiaomi and Realme aggressively launching phones with flagship-grade specs, it's a tough job being a mid-ranger these days. We do believe the A71 has a bright future though, as its price will soon go down, while many carriers will subsidize it enough to make it an attractive purchase.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung launched its newest mid-range device, The Galaxy A71, in-line with that we did our quick hands-on video a couple of days ago. After spending some quality time with this device we are now ready to give our full thoughts on the Galaxy A71.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 13.02.2020
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung launched its newest mid-range device, The Galaxy A71, in-line with that we did our quick hands-on video a couple of days ago. After spending some quality time with this device we are now ready to give our full thoughts on the Galaxy A71.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 13.02.2020
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE Archive.org version
The panel is bright and offers vivid colors, performance is pretty smooth, the battery life is impressive, and it produces decent photos with both the rear and front cameras. With its price tag of PHP 22,990, you might want to consider this competent mid-range smartphone in your options.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.02.2020
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE Archive.org version
The panel is bright and offers vivid colors, performance is pretty smooth, the battery life is impressive, and it produces decent photos with both the rear and front cameras. With its price tag of PHP 22,990, you might want to consider this competent mid-range smartphone in your options.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.02.2020
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
Before the highly-anticipated launch of the Galaxy S20 series and Galaxy Z Flip, Samsung brought its next-generation Galaxy A series to the Philippines first. The Galaxy A71 is our first look at Samsung’s new design language for its phones, retaining the Galaxy A70’s big screen while adding better hardware in the form of a new camera module and processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.02.2020
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
Before the highly-anticipated launch of the Galaxy S20 series and Galaxy Z Flip, Samsung brought its next-generation Galaxy A series to the Philippines first. The Galaxy A71 is our first look at Samsung’s new design language for its phones, retaining the Galaxy A70’s big screen while adding better hardware in the form of a new camera module and processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.02.2020
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A71 compares favourably against other midrange phones and brings a lot to the table, offering a massive and vibrant Super AMOLED display, a good rear quad camera, expandable memory, an audio jack and above all, superb battery life, all at a price under RM1,800.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A71 compares favourably against other midrange phones and brings a lot to the table, offering a massive and vibrant Super AMOLED display, a good rear quad camera, expandable memory, an audio jack and above all, superb battery life, all at a price under RM1,800.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
Our test unit lacked the box and any other accessories that would typically come with it so we can’t comment on how much extra value you get but for its intended asking price at about under RM2,000, the Galaxy A71 is a good looking midranger indeed.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.01.2020
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
Our test unit lacked the box and any other accessories that would typically come with it so we can’t comment on how much extra value you get but for its intended asking price at about under RM2,000, the Galaxy A71 is a good looking midranger indeed.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.01.2020
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
Keeping it juiced is a large 4,500mAh battery with 25W fast charging via a USB Type-C port. In Malaysia, the Galaxy A71 ships in three colours – Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Black and Prism Crush Blue. The chassis is also done up in glasstic so it has properties akin to the A51, with a light carry weight and a mirrored finish that bears up to casual inspection. No word on price or exact launch dates yet but we’ll keep you posted.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.01.2020
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
Keeping it juiced is a large 4,500mAh battery with 25W fast charging via a USB Type-C port. In Malaysia, the Galaxy A71 ships in three colours – Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Black and Prism Crush Blue. The chassis is also done up in glasstic so it has properties akin to the A51, with a light carry weight and a mirrored finish that bears up to casual inspection. No word on price or exact launch dates yet but we’ll keep you posted.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.01.2020
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE Archive.org version
This is a mid-range phone that is really trying to outmuscle its £420 price and go big. It’s got a large 6.7-inch display, fast 25w charging for a big battery and a 64MP main camera. It’s not the prettiest phone around, but if you’re into watching media on the go and shooting video then you’ll find a lot to like here.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.01.2020
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE Archive.org version
This is a mid-range phone that is really trying to outmuscle its £420 price and go big. It’s got a large 6.7-inch display, fast 25w charging for a big battery and a 64MP main camera. It’s not the prettiest phone around, but if you’re into watching media on the go and shooting video then you’ll find a lot to like here.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.01.2020
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
The A71’s appeal will depend heavily on price, but if it’s similar to the A70 then Samsung will be onto a winner. The core spec here is really solid, and the compromises - plastic back, HD display, no wireless charging or waterproofing - are all on points that are less important to most users. If you can ignore the appeal of the S-series branding on the S10 Lite, the A71 looks like the phone to beat in Samsung’s mid-tier offering.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.01.2020
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
The A71’s appeal will depend heavily on price, but if it’s similar to the A70 then Samsung will be onto a winner. The core spec here is really solid, and the compromises - plastic back, HD display, no wireless charging or waterproofing - are all on points that are less important to most users. If you can ignore the appeal of the S-series branding on the S10 Lite, the A71 looks like the phone to beat in Samsung’s mid-tier offering.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.01.2020
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has plenty going for it, from its big screen and power to the feature-packed cameras and massive battery - this could well be a winning formula at an attractive price point.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.01.2020
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has plenty going for it, from its big screen and power to the feature-packed cameras and massive battery - this could well be a winning formula at an attractive price point.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.01.2020
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Ausstattung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Ausstattung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Andro 4 All ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: Andro 4 All ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: Profesional Review ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Profesional Review ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Hipertextual ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Hipertextual ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 93% Mobilität: 93% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 93% Mobilität: 93% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: El Androide Libre ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive macro cameras; nice display; long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.03.2020
Quelle: El Androide Libre ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive macro cameras; nice display; long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.03.2020
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; great cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.03.2020
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; great cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.03.2020
Quelle: PC Guia PT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 20.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Preis: 70%
Quelle: PC Guia PT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 20.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Preis: 70%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 88% Gehäuse: 71%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 88% Gehäuse: 71%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 63% Ausstattung: 84%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 63% Ausstattung: 84%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 84%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 84%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 65% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 65% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Pianeta Cellulare IT→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; attractive price; big screen; nice display; large battery capacity; quick charging; good connectivity; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.03.2020
Quelle: Pianeta Cellulare IT→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; attractive price; big screen; nice display; large battery capacity; quick charging; good connectivity; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.03.2020
Quelle: Computer Totaal NL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Computer Totaal NL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Diskidee.nl NL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; beautiful display; long battery life; nice cameras. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor; weak hardware; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.02.2020
Quelle: Diskidee.nl NL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; beautiful display; long battery life; nice cameras. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor; weak hardware; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.02.2020
Quelle: 01Net FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 70% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: 01Net FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 70% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Fredzone FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 85% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Fredzone FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 85% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; beautiful screen; nice cameras; high autonomy; USB-C; mini jack. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor; no LED notification.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.03.2020
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; beautiful screen; nice cameras; high autonomy; USB-C; mini jack. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor; no LED notification.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.03.2020
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; excellent display; powerful hardware; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.01.2020
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; excellent display; powerful hardware; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.01.2020
Quelle: 90 Sekund PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: 90 Sekund PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 07.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 07.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; good price; nice performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 21.06.2020
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; good price; nice performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 21.06.2020
Quelle: Antyweb PL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; long battery life; nice performance; decent cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.02.2020
Quelle: Antyweb PL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; long battery life; nice performance; decent cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.02.2020
Quelle: Chip Online TR TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 92%
Quelle: Chip Online TR TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 92%
Quelle: Log.com.tr TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Log.com.tr TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Hitech Vesti RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; high performance; excellent display; long battery life; great cameras; NFC. Negative: Plastic case; inflexible fingerprint scanner.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.03.2020
Quelle: Hitech Vesti RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; high performance; excellent display; long battery life; great cameras; NFC. Negative: Plastic case; inflexible fingerprint scanner.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.03.2020
Quelle: Mega Obzor RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.02.2020
Quelle: Mega Obzor RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.02.2020
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 85% Ausstattung: 81% Mobilität: 89% Gehäuse: 84%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 85% Ausstattung: 81% Mobilität: 89% Gehäuse: 84%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 85% Ausstattung: 81% Mobilität: 89% Gehäuse: 84%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 85% Ausstattung: 81% Mobilität: 89% Gehäuse: 84%
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; excellent display; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.12.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; excellent display; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.12.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great cameras; decent hardware; nice performance.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.08.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great cameras; decent hardware; nice performance.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.08.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; excellent macro cameras; premium design; big screen; quick charging.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.08.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; excellent macro cameras; premium design; big screen; quick charging.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.08.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; powerful hardware; nice cameras; long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.07.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; powerful hardware; nice cameras; long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.07.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent hardware; nice performance; elegant design; great built quality.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.05.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent hardware; nice performance; elegant design; great built quality.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.05.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; great cameras; decent hardware; high performance; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.04.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; great cameras; decent hardware; high performance; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.04.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; excellent cameras; decent hardware; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.03.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; excellent cameras; decent hardware; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.03.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent cameras; great display; compact size; light weight; nice gaming performance; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.03.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent cameras; great display; compact size; light weight; nice gaming performance; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.03.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; suitable for girls; solid workmanship; infinity-O display; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.03.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; suitable for girls; solid workmanship; infinity-O display; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.03.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; suitable for girls; nice display; good hardware; high performance.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.03.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; good price; impressive macro cameras; suitable for girls.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.03.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; suitable for girls; nice display; good hardware; high performance.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.03.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; good price; impressive macro cameras; suitable for girls.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.03.2020
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; suitable for girls.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.03.2020
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; suitable for girls.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.03.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive macro cameras; decent hardware; big screen. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.02.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive macro cameras; decent hardware; big screen. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; slim size; beautiful design; nice display; great cameras.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; premium design; powerful hardware; high performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; slim size; beautiful design; nice display; great cameras.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; premium design; powerful hardware; high performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.02.2020
Quelle: Techtimes.vn VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; high performance; long battery life; excellent cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.02.2020
Quelle: Techtimes.vn VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; high performance; long battery life; excellent cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.02.2020
Quelle: XT Mobile VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; great built quality; compact size; light weight; powerful hardware; excellent cameras; long battery life; quick charging. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.02.2020
Quelle: XT Mobile VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; great built quality; compact size; light weight; powerful hardware; excellent cameras; long battery life; quick charging. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.02.2020
Quelle: Tinh Te VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; big screen; super AMOLED display; nice cameras; high performance; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.02.2020
Quelle: Tinh Te VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; big screen; super AMOLED display; nice cameras; high performance; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.02.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Compact size; light weight; big screen; good hardware; nice performance; long battery life; quick charging. Negative: Mediocre design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.02.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Compact size; light weight; big screen; good hardware; nice performance; long battery life; quick charging. Negative: Mediocre design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.02.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; large battery capacity; high performance; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; big screen; large battery capacity; fast charging; nice cameras; powerful processor; modern design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.02.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; large battery capacity; high performance; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; big screen; large battery capacity; fast charging; nice cameras; powerful processor; modern design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great display; excellent cameras; high performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great display; excellent cameras; high performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.02.2020
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; attractive design; big screen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; impressive quad cameras; excellent display; stylish design; powerful hardware; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.02.2020
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; attractive design; big screen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; impressive quad cameras; excellent display; stylish design; powerful hardware; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.02.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; decent hardware; nice cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.01.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; decent hardware; nice cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.01.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; decent hardware; great cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.01.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; decent hardware; great cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.01.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; decent hardware; nice cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.01.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice quad cameras; super AMOLED display; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent quad cameras; great display; high performance; long battery life; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.01.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; decent hardware; nice cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.01.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice quad cameras; super AMOLED display; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent quad cameras; great display; high performance; long battery life; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.01.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; large battery capacity; attractive price; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.01.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Decent hardware; nice quad cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice quad cameras; powerful processor; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.01.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; large battery capacity; attractive price; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.01.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Decent hardware; nice quad cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice quad cameras; powerful processor; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.01.2020
Quelle: Alt om Data DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 83% Leistung: 67%
Quelle: Alt om Data DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 83% Leistung: 67%
Quelle: Mobil DK DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Mobil DK DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Bildschirm: 80%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Bildschirm: 80%
Quelle: Playtech.ro →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; long battery life; good speakers; great built quality; elegant design; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.08.2020
Quelle: Playtech.ro →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; long battery life; good speakers; great built quality; elegant design; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.08.2020
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Large screen; nice performance; good autonomy; great cameras; attractive price. Negative: High price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.03.2020
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Large screen; nice performance; good autonomy; great cameras; attractive price. Negative: High price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.03.2020
Quelle: Puhelinvertailu →DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Puhelinvertailu →DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A71 5GProzessor: unknown
Grafikkarte: unknown
Bildschirm: 6.70 Zoll, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.185kg
Preis: 600 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a solid mid-range device that competes well with others in its class. It offers an excellent screen with solid battery life and speedy performance. At half the cost of flagships, you'd hardly know it's not a top-flight phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.02.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G (Snapdragon) could appeal to buyers looking for 5G speeds on a budget, as well as those who appreciate its large AMOLED screen. But when it comes to camera performance, this phone is a harder sell, mainly because the competition in the mid-range segment is so fierce. Although it’s a substantial upgrade in terms of imaging over its older down-market sibling, the Galaxy A50, the A71 5G’s street price puts it up against some very capable phones from other makers that provide generally better photo and video quality across the board. Buyers who simply want a nimble, affordable Samsung phone with a nice screen won’t be disappointed, but those who prioritize camera performance should carefully consider other handsets in the same price bracket before opting for the A71 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.12.2020
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a solid mid-range device that competes well with others in its class. It offers an excellent screen with solid battery life and speedy performance. At half the cost of flagships, you'd hardly know it's not a top-flight phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.10.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a good phone for 5G on a (relative) budget, with solid performance all around. It also costs $100 less and has a much better camera than the 5G-capable Moto Edge. That said, we'd like to see better durability for $600, and unless you buy the phone on Verizon, you're not getting a future-proof 5G experience. And with the $500 Moto One 5G launching on AT&T and Verizon soon, the competition is really heating up. So while the Galaxy A71 gets most things right, you might want to sit tight to see how things shake out before picking one up.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.09.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A71 offers a cheaper path to 5G service if that’s important to you, but otherwise it’s only a decent $600 phone. For hundreds less, the Pixel 4a and iPhone SE are better in almost every respect, save for battery life, while the OnePlus Nord is a much more well-rounded sub-$500 5G option for those who can buy it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.08.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A42 5GProzessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 750G 5G
Grafikkarte: Qualcomm Adreno 619
Bildschirm: 6.60 Zoll, 20:9, 1600 x 720 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.193kg
Preis: 369 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Nun bekommt auch eines der beliebtesten Mittelklasse-Modelle der Koreaner den aktuell schnellsten Mobilfunkstandard. Zusätzlich gibt es im Vergleich zum Vorgänger mehr Speicher, einen größeren Akku und eine Makro-Kamera. Wir müssen im Test aber auch über Rückschritte berichten...
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Samsung ist offensichtlich mit der wachsenden Konkurrenz überfordert und trifft als Reaktion teilweise etwas seltsame Entscheidungen. Ohne tiefgreifende Überlegungen wird hier ein 5G Smartphone auf den Markt geworfen, das eigentlich keine erkennbare Zielgruppe hat.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Samsung ist offensichtlich mit der wachsenden Konkurrenz überfordert und trifft als Reaktion teilweise etwas seltsame Entscheidungen. Ohne tiefgreifende Überlegungen wird hier ein 5G Smartphone auf den Markt geworfen, das eigentlich keine erkennbare Zielgruppe hat.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Computerbild
Ordentliche Größe und Leistung bei Kamera und Arbeitstempo, gute Verarbeitung – dazu 5G und ein OLED-Display. Für einen Preis unter 300 Euro ist das Galaxy ein gutes Angebot mit einem Haken: der geringen Displayschärfe.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.01.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: Computerbild
Ordentliche Größe und Leistung bei Kamera und Arbeitstempo, gute Verarbeitung – dazu 5G und ein OLED-Display. Für einen Preis unter 300 Euro ist das Galaxy ein gutes Angebot mit einem Haken: der geringen Displayschärfe.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.01.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
Battery life is the big winner here, which benefits from the screen and processor combination. You can count on two full days of usage from this phone, which is more than most other handsets offer, though charging speeds aren’t the quickest. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Especially since the phone is almost two years old at this point and Samsung is still selling it for its original $400 launch price. We think that spending a bit more for the newer and better Galaxy A53 makes more sense. The phone is also often on sale, going for as low as $350. Alternatively, getting the Pixel 5a at $449 or waiting for the Pixel 6a seems like a better deal. And if you want to spend less on a Samsung phone, get the newer Galaxy A33.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
Battery life is the big winner here, which benefits from the screen and processor combination. You can count on two full days of usage from this phone, which is more than most other handsets offer, though charging speeds aren’t the quickest. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Especially since the phone is almost two years old at this point and Samsung is still selling it for its original $400 launch price. We think that spending a bit more for the newer and better Galaxy A53 makes more sense. The phone is also often on sale, going for as low as $350. Alternatively, getting the Pixel 5a at $449 or waiting for the Pixel 6a seems like a better deal. And if you want to spend less on a Samsung phone, get the newer Galaxy A33.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
Samsung mostly covered its bases with the Galaxy A42. The phone is a solid package that offers a lot in the way of functionality. It boasts an appealing design that may not be for everyone, but at least it stands out as unique. The screen is big and bright, even if it is lower resolution than some competitors. The processor delivers the everyday performance people demand, though it is a bit on the sluggish side when it comes to intense gaming. Battery life is the big winner here, which benefits from the screen and processor combination. You can count on two full days of usage from this phone, which is more than most other handsets offer, though charging speeds aren’t the quickest. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Plenty of ~$400 phones swim in the same sea and have better screens and cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
Samsung mostly covered its bases with the Galaxy A42. The phone is a solid package that offers a lot in the way of functionality. It boasts an appealing design that may not be for everyone, but at least it stands out as unique. The screen is big and bright, even if it is lower resolution than some competitors. The processor delivers the everyday performance people demand, though it is a bit on the sluggish side when it comes to intense gaming. Battery life is the big winner here, which benefits from the screen and processor combination. You can count on two full days of usage from this phone, which is more than most other handsets offer, though charging speeds aren’t the quickest. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Plenty of ~$400 phones swim in the same sea and have better screens and cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE
Each year, Samsung’s Galaxy A-series lineup gets a little better, but there’s always an awkward outlier. This year, it’s the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G. Yes, it offers millimeter-wave 5G, but that isn't enough to make up for its shortcomings. With sluggish performance, unimpressive cameras, and a low-res display, the Galaxy A42 5G doesn't stand out from the competition and simply isn't a good value at $400. For an extra $50, the Google Pixel 5a With 5G is miles better, with a sharper display, clearer cameras, and superior software, making it our Editors' Choice award winner for midrange phones. If you're looking to spend less, meanwhile, Samsung's own Galaxy A32 5G is our Editors’ Choice winner for affordable models, and offers much better value for the money than the A42.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50%
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE
Each year, Samsung’s Galaxy A-series lineup gets a little better, but there’s always an awkward outlier. This year, it’s the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G. Yes, it offers millimeter-wave 5G, but that isn't enough to make up for its shortcomings. With sluggish performance, unimpressive cameras, and a low-res display, the Galaxy A42 5G doesn't stand out from the competition and simply isn't a good value at $400. For an extra $50, the Google Pixel 5a With 5G is miles better, with a sharper display, clearer cameras, and superior software, making it our Editors' Choice award winner for midrange phones. If you're looking to spend less, meanwhile, Samsung's own Galaxy A32 5G is our Editors’ Choice winner for affordable models, and offers much better value for the money than the A42.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE
If you think you’ll want a little more than the A42 5G has to offer, then the $500 A52 5G is a good step-up option with a bit of a better camera, a great high refresh rate screen, and the added peace of mind of IP-rated waterproofing. If you can find a Pixel 4A 5G in stock anywhere, that would be another good alternative at $500 with a better camera, faster processor, and cleaner software. It offers a smaller 6.2-inch screen, though, and again, you’ll have a hard time finding one new at this point since its successor, the Pixel 5A, will likely be arriving in the near future. If none of the above suits you, then the A42 5G really isn’t a bad choice. Its healthy support policy, decent overall performance, and robust battery life make it one of the best options from Verizon for around $400. Just don’t get too excited about mmWave.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE
If you think you’ll want a little more than the A42 5G has to offer, then the $500 A52 5G is a good step-up option with a bit of a better camera, a great high refresh rate screen, and the added peace of mind of IP-rated waterproofing. If you can find a Pixel 4A 5G in stock anywhere, that would be another good alternative at $500 with a better camera, faster processor, and cleaner software. It offers a smaller 6.2-inch screen, though, and again, you’ll have a hard time finding one new at this point since its successor, the Pixel 5A, will likely be arriving in the near future. If none of the above suits you, then the A42 5G really isn’t a bad choice. Its healthy support policy, decent overall performance, and robust battery life make it one of the best options from Verizon for around $400. Just don’t get too excited about mmWave.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65%
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
After spending more time with it, I’ve grown to love the Samsung Galaxy A42’s striking design. This is a shiny phone, almost metallic-looking in person, but it also offers an iridescent reflection peppered with an eye-catching dot pattern. I know it's a silly thing to highlight, and yet for me, it makes all of the difference. I still notice how compelling this phone looks a month later, which I didn't expect from a middle-of-the-road Samsung device. It's a stunner, no bones about it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
After spending more time with it, I’ve grown to love the Samsung Galaxy A42’s striking design. This is a shiny phone, almost metallic-looking in person, but it also offers an iridescent reflection peppered with an eye-catching dot pattern. I know it's a silly thing to highlight, and yet for me, it makes all of the difference. I still notice how compelling this phone looks a month later, which I didn't expect from a middle-of-the-road Samsung device. It's a stunner, no bones about it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE
The 5,000mAh battery will let you get two full days out of the A42 — even when you're having to bounce between 4G, Sub6, and UWB on Verizon. The screen is vivid and easy to read outdoors, but the triple-camera setup here is a distinct downgrade from other A-series offerings.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE
The 5,000mAh battery will let you get two full days out of the A42 — even when you're having to bounce between 4G, Sub6, and UWB on Verizon. The screen is vivid and easy to read outdoors, but the triple-camera setup here is a distinct downgrade from other A-series offerings.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
Samsung mostly covered its bases with the Galaxy A42. The phone is a solid package that offers a lot in the way of functionality. It boasts an appealing design that may not be for everyone, but at least it stands out as unique. The screen is big and bright, even if it is lower resolution than some competitors. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Plenty of ~$400 phones swim in the same sea and have better screens and cameras. If there’s one reason to champion the Galaxy A42 above its peers, it is surely battery life. Buy the A42 for its stellar battery power over any other reason.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
Samsung mostly covered its bases with the Galaxy A42. The phone is a solid package that offers a lot in the way of functionality. It boasts an appealing design that may not be for everyone, but at least it stands out as unique. The screen is big and bright, even if it is lower resolution than some competitors. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Plenty of ~$400 phones swim in the same sea and have better screens and cameras. If there’s one reason to champion the Galaxy A42 above its peers, it is surely battery life. Buy the A42 for its stellar battery power over any other reason.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Tech2.in.com EN→DE
But you also need to consider that, while its a good smartphone overall, the Rs 21,999 price tag still feels unfair, just for the added 5G connectivity, especially when Samsung has cut some corners with the HD+ display. In the same price segment, Samsung’s own Galaxy M32 or M31, Galaxy M51, Galaxy F62 are good alternatives. And if you are looking for smartphones outside of Samsung, then the Poco X3 Pro, OnePlus Nord/Nord CE, Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, Motorola G60, iQoo 3, Mi 10i or Realme X3 SuperZoom, are all great alternatives, and some of these also offer 5G connectivity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 08.07.2021
Quelle: Tech2.in.com EN→DE
But you also need to consider that, while its a good smartphone overall, the Rs 21,999 price tag still feels unfair, just for the added 5G connectivity, especially when Samsung has cut some corners with the HD+ display. In the same price segment, Samsung’s own Galaxy M32 or M31, Galaxy M51, Galaxy F62 are good alternatives. And if you are looking for smartphones outside of Samsung, then the Poco X3 Pro, OnePlus Nord/Nord CE, Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, Motorola G60, iQoo 3, Mi 10i or Realme X3 SuperZoom, are all great alternatives, and some of these also offer 5G connectivity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 08.07.2021
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
The Galaxy A42 5G I reviewed is a carrier device, but you can also grab one unlocked. If you're not married to Verizon, Samsung's cheaper A32 ($280 retail) and slightly more expensive A52 ($500 retail) may be better options, depending on what you're looking for, hence the odd positioning of the A42 in the market. Of course, there are fewer options if you want to buy a 5G Samsung phone direct from Verizon, so the A42 is easier to recommend on Big Red's network. Regardless of where you get it, the A42 5G is a solid phone that packs exceptional build quality. Performance is snappy, even though you only get 4GB of RAM, and the large battery means you'll avoid range anxiety. You can also expect expedient and long-term software support, though the massive amount of pre-installed bloatware should have lowered the price a little further, in my opinion. Also, the cameras are just good enough but don't really offer anything special.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
The Galaxy A42 5G I reviewed is a carrier device, but you can also grab one unlocked. If you're not married to Verizon, Samsung's cheaper A32 ($280 retail) and slightly more expensive A52 ($500 retail) may be better options, depending on what you're looking for, hence the odd positioning of the A42 in the market. Of course, there are fewer options if you want to buy a 5G Samsung phone direct from Verizon, so the A42 is easier to recommend on Big Red's network. Regardless of where you get it, the A42 5G is a solid phone that packs exceptional build quality. Performance is snappy, even though you only get 4GB of RAM, and the large battery means you'll avoid range anxiety. You can also expect expedient and long-term software support, though the massive amount of pre-installed bloatware should have lowered the price a little further, in my opinion. Also, the cameras are just good enough but don't really offer anything special.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: XDA Developers EN→DE
The Galaxy A42 5G might have been a more compelling phone last year, when it was first released outside the United States, but I’m not sure it’s as good of a purchase in 2021 at $399. It’s definitely not a bad phone, with its speedy internal hardware and massive screen, but it feels like less of a value compared to other recent phones. The Galaxy A52 5G is $100 more than this phone and has a better (but still plastic) build, a display with twice the refresh rate (120Hz), and improved cameras. If you can spend the extra money, the Galaxy A52 5G is likely a better investment. On the other side of the price spectrum, the Galaxy A32 5G is Samsung’s cheapest 5G phone at $280, and isn’t much worse than the A42.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.06.2021
Quelle: XDA Developers EN→DE
The Galaxy A42 5G might have been a more compelling phone last year, when it was first released outside the United States, but I’m not sure it’s as good of a purchase in 2021 at $399. It’s definitely not a bad phone, with its speedy internal hardware and massive screen, but it feels like less of a value compared to other recent phones. The Galaxy A52 5G is $100 more than this phone and has a better (but still plastic) build, a display with twice the refresh rate (120Hz), and improved cameras. If you can spend the extra money, the Galaxy A52 5G is likely a better investment. On the other side of the price spectrum, the Galaxy A32 5G is Samsung’s cheapest 5G phone at $280, and isn’t much worse than the A42.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.06.2021
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy M42 comes with a good build quality and it also offers a powerful mid-range processor. The smartphone comes with the latest operating system and will get three more Android updates in the future. It comes with a starting price tag of Rs 21,999 which makes it an affordable 5G smartphone. In our opinion this smartphone is for the people who only want to purchase a Samsung phone. The smartphone will face stiff competition from Realme 8 5G smartphone which is available at Rs 22,999.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy M42 comes with a good build quality and it also offers a powerful mid-range processor. The smartphone comes with the latest operating system and will get three more Android updates in the future. It comes with a starting price tag of Rs 21,999 which makes it an affordable 5G smartphone. In our opinion this smartphone is for the people who only want to purchase a Samsung phone. The smartphone will face stiff competition from Realme 8 5G smartphone which is available at Rs 22,999.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
So, should you buy the Galaxy M42 5G? Only if you’re looking for an affordable phone with excellent gaming performance and support for 5G networks. For everything else, there are better alternatives on the market, such as the Galaxy A32. It doesn’t have 5G or great gaming performance but gets you a better display (with a 90Hz refresh rate) and main camera and similar battery life and software features.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.05.2021
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
So, should you buy the Galaxy M42 5G? Only if you’re looking for an affordable phone with excellent gaming performance and support for 5G networks. For everything else, there are better alternatives on the market, such as the Galaxy A32. It doesn’t have 5G or great gaming performance but gets you a better display (with a 90Hz refresh rate) and main camera and similar battery life and software features.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.05.2021
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Galaxy M42 5G is now the most affordable 5G smartphone that Samsung has on offer. It packs in a capable processor and offers good performance. However, Samsung has cut some corners with the display. An HD+ resolution at the Rs. 21,999 price point is highly disappointing. Given that 5G networks are still not available in India, you could consider the Galaxy F62 to be a worthy alternative. If you are looking specifically for a 5G-ready smartphone, the Xiaomi Mi 10i (Review)and the Realme X7 (Review) are better alternatives to the Galaxy M42 5G at this price level.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Galaxy M42 5G is now the most affordable 5G smartphone that Samsung has on offer. It packs in a capable processor and offers good performance. However, Samsung has cut some corners with the display. An HD+ resolution at the Rs. 21,999 price point is highly disappointing. Given that 5G networks are still not available in India, you could consider the Galaxy F62 to be a worthy alternative. If you are looking specifically for a 5G-ready smartphone, the Xiaomi Mi 10i (Review)and the Realme X7 (Review) are better alternatives to the Galaxy M42 5G at this price level.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy M42 5G starts at Rs 21,999 for the 6GB RAM variant and while the phone gets a couple of things right, the smartphone’s lacklustre display and its uninspiring design stick out like a sore thumb. What’s more, the device faces stiff competition from the likes of Xiaomi’s Mi 10i too which, pound for pound, offers better specs and performance. Lest I forget, the company’s Galaxy F62 (review) retails for around the same price too and puts forth a more well-rounded package as well. Consequently, unless you’re looking for the cheapest 5G phone from Samsung, you might want to spend your hard-earned bucks elsewhere.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Mobygyaan EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy M42 has all that it takes to be a perfect midranger, let it be the CPU itself, the Snapdragon 750G is a king in its class, other than that is the Super AMOLED display, 5G capabilities, Android 11 out-of-the-box, the reliable battery life, and good cameras, aside from its new eye-catchy Prism design, however, the only two downsides we think are its display resolution which is the HD+ and the standard 60 Hz refresh rate, otherwise would be a strong contender in its class at this price (₹21,999). If it doesn’t bother you, this could be one of the best non-Chinese smartphones available in India.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.05.2021
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy M42 5G starts at Rs 21,999 for the 6GB RAM variant and while the phone gets a couple of things right, the smartphone’s lacklustre display and its uninspiring design stick out like a sore thumb. What’s more, the device faces stiff competition from the likes of Xiaomi’s Mi 10i too which, pound for pound, offers better specs and performance. Lest I forget, the company’s Galaxy F62 (review) retails for around the same price too and puts forth a more well-rounded package as well. Consequently, unless you’re looking for the cheapest 5G phone from Samsung, you might want to spend your hard-earned bucks elsewhere.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Mobygyaan EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy M42 has all that it takes to be a perfect midranger, let it be the CPU itself, the Snapdragon 750G is a king in its class, other than that is the Super AMOLED display, 5G capabilities, Android 11 out-of-the-box, the reliable battery life, and good cameras, aside from its new eye-catchy Prism design, however, the only two downsides we think are its display resolution which is the HD+ and the standard 60 Hz refresh rate, otherwise would be a strong contender in its class at this price (₹21,999). If it doesn’t bother you, this could be one of the best non-Chinese smartphones available in India.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.05.2021
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
Samsung has picked a powerful processor for the Galaxy M42 5G to take the battle to the competition. While the Rs. 21,999 starting price is competitive, it does make me wonder whether Samsung has cut corners to reach it. So is the Galaxy M42 5G a smartphone worth recommending? I'll answer this in the full review, coming soon.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.05.2021
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
Samsung has picked a powerful processor for the Galaxy M42 5G to take the battle to the competition. While the Rs. 21,999 starting price is competitive, it does make me wonder whether Samsung has cut corners to reach it. So is the Galaxy M42 5G a smartphone worth recommending? I'll answer this in the full review, coming soon.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.05.2021
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.04.2021
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.04.2021
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE
If you are coming from a smartphone with a 1080p display, it might take some time to get used to the Galaxy A42 5G’s 720p display. Still, if you’re not that nitpicky when it comes to the display category, the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G is undoubtedly one of the best smartphones on this tier.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.01.2021
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE
If you are coming from a smartphone with a 1080p display, it might take some time to get used to the Galaxy A42 5G’s 720p display. Still, if you’re not that nitpicky when it comes to the display category, the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G is undoubtedly one of the best smartphones on this tier.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.01.2021
Quelle: Yugatech
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.01.2021
Quelle: Yugatech
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.01.2021
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A42 5G is a cheap 5G mid-ranger, which excels in everything it does - gaming, browsing, multimedia, office apps, and whatnot. It has a large AMOLED screen and a beefy battery to keep whatever you are doing for quite some time. So, yes, the Galaxy A42 5G seems like a great chap.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.12.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A42 5G is a cheap 5G mid-ranger, which excels in everything it does - gaming, browsing, multimedia, office apps, and whatnot. It has a large AMOLED screen and a beefy battery to keep whatever you are doing for quite some time. So, yes, the Galaxy A42 5G seems like a great chap.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.12.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE Archive.org version
In addition to that, the phone comes with the Samsung Knox feature, which is usually available on Samsung flagships only. It allows users to safely store personal data onto the smartphone, so it's particularly suitable for high-ranking business execs. With Knox, you can prevent information stored in the smartphone from being easily leaked.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.12.2020
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE Archive.org version
In addition to that, the phone comes with the Samsung Knox feature, which is usually available on Samsung flagships only. It allows users to safely store personal data onto the smartphone, so it's particularly suitable for high-ranking business execs. With Knox, you can prevent information stored in the smartphone from being easily leaked.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.12.2020
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A42 5G is now on sale in Malaysia at the price of RM1599. If you purchase it during this month, you will be entitled to free YouTube Premium access for two months. Of course, you will need to be a Samsung member first and activate it. To learn more about the phone, you may visit Samsung's official online store here.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.12.2020
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A42 5G is now on sale in Malaysia at the price of RM1599. If you purchase it during this month, you will be entitled to free YouTube Premium access for two months. Of course, you will need to be a Samsung member first and activate it. To learn more about the phone, you may visit Samsung's official online store here.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.12.2020
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A42 5G has a lot of things that we’ve come to enjoy from their other offerings and the addition of Qualcomm’s mid-range 5G-ready processor would have made it easier to recommend for people looking to prepare themselves for the expanding network in the Philippines. But this price bracket has always been contentious and it will definitely have a tough time going against other brands’ products that offer a better price to performance ratio; especially with all the compromises, they’ve made for this model.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.12.2020
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A42 5G has a lot of things that we’ve come to enjoy from their other offerings and the addition of Qualcomm’s mid-range 5G-ready processor would have made it easier to recommend for people looking to prepare themselves for the expanding network in the Philippines. But this price bracket has always been contentious and it will definitely have a tough time going against other brands’ products that offer a better price to performance ratio; especially with all the compromises, they’ve made for this model.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.12.2020
Quelle: El Androide Libre ES→DE
Positive: Long battery life; nice cameras. Negative: Poor display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.01.2021
Quelle: El Androide Libre ES→DE
Positive: Long battery life; nice cameras. Negative: Poor display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.01.2021
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.02.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 75% Bildschirm: 79% Mobilität: 86% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.02.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 75% Bildschirm: 79% Mobilität: 86% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.02.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 65% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75% Ergonomie: 75%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.02.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 65% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75% Ergonomie: 75%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.12.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Preis: 61% Ausstattung: 67%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.12.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Preis: 61% Ausstattung: 67%
Quelle: MA Reduc FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50%
Quelle: MA Reduc FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.12.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.12.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.12.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 770% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.12.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 770% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.12.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.12.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Support 5G; good price; solid workmanship; nice performance; big screen; decent connectivity; great cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.01.2021
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Support 5G; good price; solid workmanship; nice performance; big screen; decent connectivity; great cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.01.2021
Quelle: Mere Mobil.dk DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.11.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Mere Mobil.dk DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.11.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Alt om Data DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.11.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Alt om Data DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.11.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.12.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 68%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.12.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 68%
Quelle: Puhelinvertailu →DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Puhelinvertailu →DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A12Prozessor: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Grafikkarte: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Bildschirm: 6.50 Zoll, 20:9, 1600 x 720 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.205kg
Preis: 179 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Mit seinem Einsteiger-Smartphones Galaxy A12 vereint Samsung einen starken 5.000-mAh-Akku, ein großes Display und Quad-Kamera mit dem Helio-P35-SoC von Mediatek. Ob das Gesamtkonzept überzeugt und welche Kompromisse infolge den geringen Preises in Kauf genommen werden müssen, erfahren Sie in unserem Testbericht zum Galaxy-Handy.
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A12 ist das schlechteste A-Serie-Modell 2021 und neben dem Dauerläufer Galaxy M11 eins der schlechtesten Samsung-Handys, die COMPUTER BILD im aktuellen Smartphone-Testverfahren (eingeführt 2020) bis Anfang 2022 im Test hatte. Das Display ist dunkel und liefert schwache Kontraste, das niedrige Arbeitstempo nervt. Zugegeben, ein hartes Urteil. Hinzu kommt aber, dass sich der Preis des A12 seit Ende 2021 wieder deutlich erhöht hat. Eine Alternative ist das Xiaomi Poco M3 (ohne NFC!), das mit schärferem Display und stärkerem Akku lockt – aber anders als das A12 kein NFC für kontaktloses Bezahlen besitzt. Wirklich flotte Smartphones mit tollem Display aber gibt es in der Preisklasse unter 150 Euro kaum. Wer rund 50 Euro mehr hinlegt, sollte einen Blick auf das Galaxy A22 5G von 2020 werfen: Für rund 220 Euro (Stand Januar 2022) liefert es ein scharfes OLED-Display und passable Leistung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.01.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A12 ist das schlechteste A-Serie-Modell 2021 und neben dem Dauerläufer Galaxy M11 eins der schlechtesten Samsung-Handys, die COMPUTER BILD im aktuellen Smartphone-Testverfahren (eingeführt 2020) bis Anfang 2022 im Test hatte. Das Display ist dunkel und liefert schwache Kontraste, das niedrige Arbeitstempo nervt. Zugegeben, ein hartes Urteil. Hinzu kommt aber, dass sich der Preis des A12 seit Ende 2021 wieder deutlich erhöht hat. Eine Alternative ist das Xiaomi Poco M3 (ohne NFC!), das mit schärferem Display und stärkerem Akku lockt – aber anders als das A12 kein NFC für kontaktloses Bezahlen besitzt. Wirklich flotte Smartphones mit tollem Display aber gibt es in der Preisklasse unter 150 Euro kaum. Wer rund 50 Euro mehr hinlegt, sollte einen Blick auf das Galaxy A22 5G von 2020 werfen: Für rund 220 Euro (Stand Januar 2022) liefert es ein scharfes OLED-Display und passable Leistung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.01.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A12 ist das schlechteste A-Serie-Modell 2021 und nach dem Dauerläufer Galaxy M11 das zweitschlechtestes Samsung-Handy, das COMPUTER BILD im aktuellen Smartphone-Testverfahren (eingeführt 2020) bis zum April 2021 im Test hatte. Das Display ist dunkel und liefert schwache Kontraste, das niedrige Arbeitstempo nervt. Zugegeben, ein hartes Urteil. Schließlich ist das A12 auch sehr, sehr günstig. Und eignet sich anders als manche China-Smartphones dank NFC sogar für kontaktloses Bezahlen. Eine Alternative ist das Xiaomi Poco M3 (ohne NFC!), das mit schärferem Display und stärkerem Akku lockt. Wirklich flotte Smartphones mit tollem Display aber gibt es in der Preisklasse unter 150 Euro kaum. Wer rund 50 Euro mehr hinlegt, sollte einen Blick auf das Galaxy A31 von 2020 werfen: Für rund 200 Euro (Stand April 2021) liefert es ein scharfes OLED-Display und passable Leistung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A12 ist das schlechteste A-Serie-Modell 2021 und nach dem Dauerläufer Galaxy M11 das zweitschlechtestes Samsung-Handy, das COMPUTER BILD im aktuellen Smartphone-Testverfahren (eingeführt 2020) bis zum April 2021 im Test hatte. Das Display ist dunkel und liefert schwache Kontraste, das niedrige Arbeitstempo nervt. Zugegeben, ein hartes Urteil. Schließlich ist das A12 auch sehr, sehr günstig. Und eignet sich anders als manche China-Smartphones dank NFC sogar für kontaktloses Bezahlen. Eine Alternative ist das Xiaomi Poco M3 (ohne NFC!), das mit schärferem Display und stärkerem Akku lockt. Wirklich flotte Smartphones mit tollem Display aber gibt es in der Preisklasse unter 150 Euro kaum. Wer rund 50 Euro mehr hinlegt, sollte einen Blick auf das Galaxy A31 von 2020 werfen: Für rund 200 Euro (Stand April 2021) liefert es ein scharfes OLED-Display und passable Leistung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 07.10.2024
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 07.10.2024
Quelle: Tech Amaze EN→DE
Galaxy A12 is not flawless, but when it comes to its price tag, its weaknesses can be overlooked. The display of Samsung’s budget smartphone is not very suitable for use under direct sunlight due to its low maximum brightness. On the other hand, we would have preferred Samsung to use a better wide camera for night photography or a more powerful chip on its smartphone instead of the ineffective macro and ultra-wide cameras. Galaxy A12 experiences relatively significant changes compared to Galaxy A11. The attractive appearance of the back panel, the use of matte coating, the satisfactory performance of the wide and depth cameras, the acceptable hardware performance, and the good battery life are the key features of Galaxy A12 that make it a valuable product for purchase along with its reasonable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.11.2023
Quelle: Tech Amaze EN→DE
Galaxy A12 is not flawless, but when it comes to its price tag, its weaknesses can be overlooked. The display of Samsung’s budget smartphone is not very suitable for use under direct sunlight due to its low maximum brightness. On the other hand, we would have preferred Samsung to use a better wide camera for night photography or a more powerful chip on its smartphone instead of the ineffective macro and ultra-wide cameras. Galaxy A12 experiences relatively significant changes compared to Galaxy A11. The attractive appearance of the back panel, the use of matte coating, the satisfactory performance of the wide and depth cameras, the acceptable hardware performance, and the good battery life are the key features of Galaxy A12 that make it a valuable product for purchase along with its reasonable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.11.2023
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.11.2022
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.11.2022
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
It’s hard to criticise a £169 smartphone that looks this good and keeps going for so long between charges, but the Galaxy A12’s dismal performance poisons the well. It’s so sluggish that it’s difficult to recommend to anybody. The good news is that it is possible to buy a solid all-rounder at the price without compromising on user experience. The Motorola Moto G8 costs £179 and does everything that the Galaxy A12 does well, but without any of the lag.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
It’s hard to criticise a £169 smartphone that looks this good and keeps going for so long between charges, but the Galaxy A12’s dismal performance poisons the well. It’s so sluggish that it’s difficult to recommend to anybody. The good news is that it is possible to buy a solid all-rounder at the price without compromising on user experience. The Motorola Moto G8 costs £179 and does everything that the Galaxy A12 does well, but without any of the lag.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a solid upgrade over the Galaxy A11 in almost every way. What this budget-friendly phone does bring to the table is a good 48MP main camera, excellent battery life, and Samsung’s crisp and attractive One UI software. Unfortunately, the peripheral cameras lack punch, and the laggy performance can be frustrating, but these are expected trade-offs at this price tier. We’ve mentioned that the Galaxy A12 lands right around Motorola’s Moto G Power (2022) ($199), and while both appear well suited for someone buying their first smartphone, the Galaxy is a far safer pick. The lack of 5G limits its future prospects, though you can try out the OnePlus Nord N20 ($282) or pick up Samsung’s newer Galaxy A13 5G ($249) if you want to tap into top speeds.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a solid upgrade over the Galaxy A11 in almost every way. What this budget-friendly phone does bring to the table is a good 48MP main camera, excellent battery life, and Samsung’s crisp and attractive One UI software. Unfortunately, the peripheral cameras lack punch, and the laggy performance can be frustrating, but these are expected trade-offs at this price tier. We’ve mentioned that the Galaxy A12 lands right around Motorola’s Moto G Power (2022) ($199), and while both appear well suited for someone buying their first smartphone, the Galaxy is a far safer pick. The lack of 5G limits its future prospects, though you can try out the OnePlus Nord N20 ($282) or pick up Samsung’s newer Galaxy A13 5G ($249) if you want to tap into top speeds.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.05.2022
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.05.2022
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
I'd recommend the Galaxy A03S to anyone who wants to spend less than $200 on a new Samsung phone. Since it's the newest of the three phones, it'll get more years of software and security updates. I also found that it offered respectable performance for the price. While the A12 does take better photos, I didn't think the step up in quality was worth the extra $20. Instead, buy the A03S and invest that $20 toward the microSD card you'll need. If you wanted to check out other sub-$200 phones that aren't made by Samsung, Motorola has the $160 Moto G Pure phone and a $200 Moto G Power phone. The OnePlus Nord N200 5G goes slightly above the $200 threshold at $240, but it offers 5G connectivity.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2022
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
I'd recommend the Galaxy A03S to anyone who wants to spend less than $200 on a new Samsung phone. Since it's the newest of the three phones, it'll get more years of software and security updates. I also found that it offered respectable performance for the price. While the A12 does take better photos, I didn't think the step up in quality was worth the extra $20. Instead, buy the A03S and invest that $20 toward the microSD card you'll need. If you wanted to check out other sub-$200 phones that aren't made by Samsung, Motorola has the $160 Moto G Pure phone and a $200 Moto G Power phone. The OnePlus Nord N200 5G goes slightly above the $200 threshold at $240, but it offers 5G connectivity.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2022
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.09.2021
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a solid upgrade over the Galaxy A11 in almost every way. What this budget-friendly phone does bring to the table is a good 48MP main camera, excellent battery life, and Samsung’s crisp and attractive One UI software. Unfortunately, the peripheral cameras lack punch and the laggy performance can be frustrating, but these are expected trade-offs at this price tier. We’ve mentioned that the Galaxy A12 lands right around Motorola’s Moto G Power ($249) and Moto G Play ($169), and it’s well suited for someone buying their first smartphone. The lack of 5G limits its future prospects, though you can try out the OnePlus Nord N200 ($239) or splurge a bit on Samsung’s Galaxy A32 5G ($279) if you want to tap into top speeds. Samsung’s Galaxy A12 is also available on Verizon, US Cellular, and AT&T.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.09.2021
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a solid upgrade over the Galaxy A11 in almost every way. What this budget-friendly phone does bring to the table is a good 48MP main camera, excellent battery life, and Samsung’s crisp and attractive One UI software. Unfortunately, the peripheral cameras lack punch and the laggy performance can be frustrating, but these are expected trade-offs at this price tier. We’ve mentioned that the Galaxy A12 lands right around Motorola’s Moto G Power ($249) and Moto G Play ($169), and it’s well suited for someone buying their first smartphone. The lack of 5G limits its future prospects, though you can try out the OnePlus Nord N200 ($239) or splurge a bit on Samsung’s Galaxy A32 5G ($279) if you want to tap into top speeds. Samsung’s Galaxy A12 is also available on Verizon, US Cellular, and AT&T.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
Budget phones have their place, and for some, spending more than $200 on a mobile device is simply not worth it. The Galaxy A12 isn't a bad phone — in fact, it's an able road trip companion, with its giant display and a battery to match. But Samsung had to cut several corners to get the price this low, and unfortunately, performance just can't keep up with modern standards. Ultimately, the Galaxy A12 fails to find a single category where it defeats the competition. It's a phone of compromises, but one that makes all the wrong choices when cutting corners. Extra-long battery life only takes you so far when using the phone is frustratingly slow. With superior devices available for just a bit of extra cash upfront, you're better off opting for something else.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
Budget phones have their place, and for some, spending more than $200 on a mobile device is simply not worth it. The Galaxy A12 isn't a bad phone — in fact, it's an able road trip companion, with its giant display and a battery to match. But Samsung had to cut several corners to get the price this low, and unfortunately, performance just can't keep up with modern standards. Ultimately, the Galaxy A12 fails to find a single category where it defeats the competition. It's a phone of compromises, but one that makes all the wrong choices when cutting corners. Extra-long battery life only takes you so far when using the phone is frustratingly slow. With superior devices available for just a bit of extra cash upfront, you're better off opting for something else.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a budget smartphone competing in the Essential segment ($200 or under). Despite the modest price point, it offers some impressive specs, including an octa-core processor, a 6.5-inch TFT display with HD+ resolution, and 64 GB of internal memory to store your photos and videos. For the rear camera, the primary module with a 48 MP sensor is assisted by a 5 MP ultra-wide, a 2 MP macro camera, and a depth sensor. Let’s see how this combo does in the DXOMARK Camera test.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.09.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a budget smartphone competing in the Essential segment ($200 or under). Despite the modest price point, it offers some impressive specs, including an octa-core processor, a 6.5-inch TFT display with HD+ resolution, and 64 GB of internal memory to store your photos and videos. For the rear camera, the primary module with a 48 MP sensor is assisted by a 5 MP ultra-wide, a 2 MP macro camera, and a depth sensor. Let’s see how this combo does in the DXOMARK Camera test.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.09.2021
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
It’s a fully plastic build, but we think the blue color and textured back make it quite fun to hold in hand. And also, one or two cool things here. We get dual sim support with a dedicated Micro SD card slot and a headphone jack.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.07.2021
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
It’s a fully plastic build, but we think the blue color and textured back make it quite fun to hold in hand. And also, one or two cool things here. We get dual sim support with a dedicated Micro SD card slot and a headphone jack.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.07.2021
Quelle: XDA Developers EN→DE
The Galaxy A12 is one of the cheapest smartphones currently sold by Samsung, so it’s probably not much of a surprise that the phone isn’t wildly fast. However, the phone is incredibly frustrating to use, even by the standard of other budget smartphones. When the keyboard is lagging during the initial setup process, you know you’re in for trouble. I would strongly recommend buying a Galaxy A32 5G instead if you can afford it, which normally costs $279.99 but frequently goes on sale for $205. Buying a used iPhone 8 or iPhone X is another solid option in this price range — battery life likely won’t be as good, but you could replace the battery later on, and even these old iPhones are substantially faster than the Galaxy A12. They should also have a few iOS updates left since iOS 15 still supports devices as old as the iPhone 6S.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.07.2021
Quelle: XDA Developers EN→DE
The Galaxy A12 is one of the cheapest smartphones currently sold by Samsung, so it’s probably not much of a surprise that the phone isn’t wildly fast. However, the phone is incredibly frustrating to use, even by the standard of other budget smartphones. When the keyboard is lagging during the initial setup process, you know you’re in for trouble. I would strongly recommend buying a Galaxy A32 5G instead if you can afford it, which normally costs $279.99 but frequently goes on sale for $205. Buying a used iPhone 8 or iPhone X is another solid option in this price range — battery life likely won’t be as good, but you could replace the battery later on, and even these old iPhones are substantially faster than the Galaxy A12. They should also have a few iOS updates left since iOS 15 still supports devices as old as the iPhone 6S.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.07.2021
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
Budget phones have their place, and for some, spending more than $200 on a mobile device is simply not worth it. The Galaxy A12 isn't a bad phone — in fact, it's an able road trip companion, with its giant display and a battery to match. The Galaxy A32 costs $100 more, and includes a better display and improved camera quality. There are also phones like the OnePlus Nord N200 5G, which has much better hardware for just $240. Ultimately, the Galaxy A12 fails to find a single category where it defeats the competition. It's a phone of compromises, but one that makes all the wrong choices when cutting corners. Extra-long battery life only takes you so far when using the phone is frustratingly slow. With superior devices available for just a bit of extra cash upfront, you're better off opting for something else.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
Budget phones have their place, and for some, spending more than $200 on a mobile device is simply not worth it. The Galaxy A12 isn't a bad phone — in fact, it's an able road trip companion, with its giant display and a battery to match. The Galaxy A32 costs $100 more, and includes a better display and improved camera quality. There are also phones like the OnePlus Nord N200 5G, which has much better hardware for just $240. Ultimately, the Galaxy A12 fails to find a single category where it defeats the competition. It's a phone of compromises, but one that makes all the wrong choices when cutting corners. Extra-long battery life only takes you so far when using the phone is frustratingly slow. With superior devices available for just a bit of extra cash upfront, you're better off opting for something else.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Galaxy A12’s saving grace is its big battery and a set of cameras that perform well in the daylight. In most other aspects, it is mostly a hit-or-miss and that makes it falter against the competition. The budget segment has evolved quite a bit and I believe that Samsung’s more recent Galaxy M12 is a better answer to its rivals.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Galaxy A12’s saving grace is its big battery and a set of cameras that perform well in the daylight. In most other aspects, it is mostly a hit-or-miss and that makes it falter against the competition. The budget segment has evolved quite a bit and I believe that Samsung’s more recent Galaxy M12 is a better answer to its rivals.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
For a quick rundown, the Samsung Galaxy A12 gives an impressive camera and tough battery life for the price of P7,990 (4GB+128GB) and P9,990 (6GB+128GB). You may be nitpicking on some other phones in its price range but if you are not into heavy gaming or you are on a budget, or even an average user that wants the Samsung’s environment, software, AI, and optimization, Give the Galaxy A12 a try, and you might find it enjoyable.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2021
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
For a quick rundown, the Samsung Galaxy A12 gives an impressive camera and tough battery life for the price of P7,990 (4GB+128GB) and P9,990 (6GB+128GB). You may be nitpicking on some other phones in its price range but if you are not into heavy gaming or you are on a budget, or even an average user that wants the Samsung’s environment, software, AI, and optimization, Give the Galaxy A12 a try, and you might find it enjoyable.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2021
Quelle: Manila Shaker
We tested the power of the latest entry-level device from Samsung-- the Samsung Galaxy A12. In our video, we also tested the battery life, benchmarks, charging, and the fps counter of each game including; Mobile Legends, League of Legends: Wildrift, PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, Honkai Impact 3, and Genshin Impact. Watch our video to see the results.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.03.2021
Quelle: Manila Shaker
We tested the power of the latest entry-level device from Samsung-- the Samsung Galaxy A12. In our video, we also tested the battery life, benchmarks, charging, and the fps counter of each game including; Mobile Legends, League of Legends: Wildrift, PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, Honkai Impact 3, and Genshin Impact. Watch our video to see the results.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.03.2021
Quelle: Manila Shaker
Samsung Galaxy A12 is one of Samsung's latest entry-level smartphones on their Galaxy A series. For the price of P7,990, is it enough?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.03.2021
Quelle: Manila Shaker
Samsung Galaxy A12 is one of Samsung's latest entry-level smartphones on their Galaxy A series. For the price of P7,990, is it enough?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.03.2021
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
While the Samsung Galaxy A12 is far more affordable than the brand’s other offerings as we found out in this review, it’s going up against stiff competition against phones that are cheaper and faster. It does offer a decent vlogging experience for people who shoot vertical videos to be put up on TikTok, IG Stories, or FB.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.03.2021
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
While the Samsung Galaxy A12 is far more affordable than the brand’s other offerings as we found out in this review, it’s going up against stiff competition against phones that are cheaper and faster. It does offer a decent vlogging experience for people who shoot vertical videos to be put up on TikTok, IG Stories, or FB.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.03.2021
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
Samsung is probably not the name that pops in mind when one talks about the budget phone segment. But the company has been trying to carve out a name in this price range. Samsung Galaxy A12 seems to work in the same direction. Will the phone make a leap forward for the popular flagship maker? That only time can tell. But the device does make a point that the company has everything to become a popular choice in the budget phone category. With its decent camera abilities and good battery life, Galaxy A12 does make a case for Samsung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 28.02.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
Samsung is probably not the name that pops in mind when one talks about the budget phone segment. But the company has been trying to carve out a name in this price range. Samsung Galaxy A12 seems to work in the same direction. Will the phone make a leap forward for the popular flagship maker? That only time can tell. But the device does make a point that the company has everything to become a popular choice in the budget phone category. With its decent camera abilities and good battery life, Galaxy A12 does make a case for Samsung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 28.02.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
Samsung often struggles to compete with the value-oriented brands in the lower market segments, and that's the case with the Galaxy A12 we have here. It's not a bad phone, and it excels in endurance, it takes decent pictures, and it looks good in the process. It's also a Samsung, and the brand itself could make it more appealing than its actual merits.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.02.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
Samsung often struggles to compete with the value-oriented brands in the lower market segments, and that's the case with the Galaxy A12 we have here. It's not a bad phone, and it excels in endurance, it takes decent pictures, and it looks good in the process. It's also a Samsung, and the brand itself could make it more appealing than its actual merits.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.02.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE
Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A12 is satisfactory as long as you use it casually. Its best selling point is none other than the battery, of course, which can last up to two days and the camera performance is satisfactory. However, it faces tough competition from other phones, which are cheaper yet deliver similar or superior specs.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.02.2021
Quelle: PC Quest EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is the latest offering in the infamous “A” line-up of phones. Samsung has always tried to make their phones accessible to people of all walks of life and the “A” series that started off as a high mid-range segment has made its way to the mid-range and budget segment quite gracefully.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 19.02.2021
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE
Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A12 is satisfactory as long as you use it casually. Its best selling point is none other than the battery, of course, which can last up to two days and the camera performance is satisfactory. However, it faces tough competition from other phones, which are cheaper yet deliver similar or superior specs.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.02.2021
Quelle: PC Quest EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is the latest offering in the infamous “A” line-up of phones. Samsung has always tried to make their phones accessible to people of all walks of life and the “A” series that started off as a high mid-range segment has made its way to the mid-range and budget segment quite gracefully.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 19.02.2021
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
But the Samsung Galaxy A12 here offers a much better user experience – especially the software – in comparison with other phones in this category. And since the software is what we interact with whenever we touch the device, I’d argue that some people will definitely pay more to get a better experience.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.01.2021
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
But the Samsung Galaxy A12 here offers a much better user experience – especially the software – in comparison with other phones in this category. And since the software is what we interact with whenever we touch the device, I’d argue that some people will definitely pay more to get a better experience.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.01.2021
Quelle: Phone World EN→DE
After reading my review, you must thinking about purchasing this smartphone. Certainly, this smartphone deserves a chance. I’m pretty sure that Galaxy A12 will stun the market in terms of sale. I have used this phone and keenly observed all its features. Under this price range, the phone is worth buying.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.01.2021
Quelle: Phone World EN→DE
After reading my review, you must thinking about purchasing this smartphone. Certainly, this smartphone deserves a chance. I’m pretty sure that Galaxy A12 will stun the market in terms of sale. I have used this phone and keenly observed all its features. Under this price range, the phone is worth buying.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.01.2021
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Great battery life; solid workmanship; nice main camera. Negative: Plastic case; weak processor; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.06.2021
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Great battery life; solid workmanship; nice main camera. Negative: Plastic case; weak processor; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.06.2021
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 64% Preis: 65% Ausstattung: 60% Bildschirm: 65% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75% Ergonomie: 75%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 64% Preis: 65% Ausstattung: 60% Bildschirm: 65% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75% Ergonomie: 75%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 68% Leistung: 62% Mobilität: 84% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 68% Leistung: 62% Mobilität: 84% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Positive: Good price; long battery life; modern design; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.04.2021
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Positive: Good price; long battery life; modern design; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.04.2021
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.02.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.02.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; long battery life; nice performance; low price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.03.2021
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; long battery life; nice performance; low price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.03.2021
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Attractive price; beautiful design; nice display; long battery life; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.03.2021
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Attractive price; beautiful design; nice display; long battery life; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.03.2021
Quelle: DGL.ru RU→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; bright display; decent autonomy; nice cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.03.2021
Quelle: DGL.ru RU→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; bright display; decent autonomy; nice cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.03.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Long battery life; high performance; stylish design; great cameras; beautiful display; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.01.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Long battery life; high performance; stylish design; great cameras; beautiful display; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.01.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Good price; 6GB RAM; long battery life; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.06.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Good price; 6GB RAM; long battery life; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.06.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Good price; stylish design; great built quality; nice performance; long battery life; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.03.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Good price; stylish design; great built quality; nice performance; long battery life; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.03.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; big screen; large storage; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.01.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; big screen; large storage; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.01.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Impressive autonomy; high gaming performance; modern design; nice cameras; large storage.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.01.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Impressive autonomy; high gaming performance; modern design; nice cameras; large storage.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.01.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; excellent quad cameras; long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.01.2021
Quelle: Tinh Te VN→DE
Positive: Good price; nice design; great display; excellent cameras; decent performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.01.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; excellent quad cameras; long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.01.2021
Quelle: Tinh Te VN→DE
Positive: Good price; nice design; great display; excellent cameras; decent performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.01.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Excellent quad cameras; impressive battery life; large storage; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.01.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Excellent quad cameras; impressive battery life; large storage; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.01.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Nice quad cameras; powerful hardware; high performance; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.01.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Nice quad cameras; powerful hardware; high performance; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.01.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Large battery life; excellent quad cameras; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.12.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; nice cameras; high autonomy; low price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.12.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Large battery life; excellent quad cameras; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.12.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; nice cameras; high autonomy; low price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.12.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; large battery capacity; big screen; nice quad cameras; quick charging; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.12.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; large battery capacity; big screen; nice quad cameras; quick charging; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.12.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Great quad cameras; long battery life; decent hardware; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.12.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive macro cameras; powerful hardware; long battery life; attractive price.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.12.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Great quad cameras; long battery life; decent hardware; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.12.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive macro cameras; powerful hardware; long battery life; attractive price.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.12.2020
Quelle: Genk VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; decent autonomy; quick charging; good price.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.11.2020
Quelle: Genk VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; decent autonomy; quick charging; good price.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.11.2020
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 66%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 66%
Quelle: Arena IT →DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Preis: 70% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Arena IT →DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Preis: 70% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A52 5GProzessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 750G 5G
Grafikkarte: Qualcomm Adreno 619
Bildschirm: 6.50 Zoll, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.189kg
Preis: 429 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Mit dem Galaxy A52 5G legt Samsung eines seiner erfolgreichsten Smartphones neu auf und spendiert einige Upgrades, jedoch auch einen Preisaufschlag, welcher das populäre Handy erstmal über die 400-Euro-Marke befördert. Warum das Galaxy A52 5G dennoch jeden Cent wert ist, erfahren Sie im Test.
Quelle: Chip (Print) - 9/22
Dank neuer Prozessoren sind 5G-Smartphones schon für unter 200 Euro zu haben. Aber längst nicht alle Modelle sind eine Empfehlung wert.
Vergleich, online nicht verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.08.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 93%
Quelle: Chip (Print) - 9/22
Dank neuer Prozessoren sind 5G-Smartphones schon für unter 200 Euro zu haben. Aber längst nicht alle Modelle sind eine Empfehlung wert.
Vergleich, online nicht verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.08.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 93%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Mit dem Galaxy A52 5G präsentiert Samsung ein konkurrenzfähiges Mittelklasse-Handy zu einem fairen Preis, vor allem, wenn man den langen Support-Zeitraum für das Handy bedenkt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Ausstattung: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Mit dem Galaxy A52 5G präsentiert Samsung ein konkurrenzfähiges Mittelklasse-Handy zu einem fairen Preis, vor allem, wenn man den langen Support-Zeitraum für das Handy bedenkt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Ausstattung: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Area DVD
Auch Samsung kann günstig! Das preiswerte Samsung Galaxy A52 5G mit 5G-Unterstützung ist in allen relevanten Disziplinen gut bis sehr gut aufgestellt:
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.07.2021
Quelle: Area DVD
Auch Samsung kann günstig! Das preiswerte Samsung Galaxy A52 5G mit 5G-Unterstützung ist in allen relevanten Disziplinen gut bis sehr gut aufgestellt:
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.07.2021
Quelle: Computerbild
Für alle, die ein günstiges Smartphone mit 5G suchen, ist das Galaxy A52 5G ein Blick wert. Das Arbeitstempo ist passabel, der Prozessor sogar einen Hauch schneller als beim normalen A52. Wer Wert auf eine laufruhige, ruckelfreie Darstellung legt, wird sich über die hohe Bildwiederholrate von 120 Hertz freuen. Doch die ist vermutlich Schuld daran, dass die 5G-Version im Test eine viel kürzere Akku-Laufzeit als die LTE-Variante erreicht.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Computerbild
Für alle, die ein günstiges Smartphone mit 5G suchen, ist das Galaxy A52 5G ein Blick wert. Das Arbeitstempo ist passabel, der Prozessor sogar einen Hauch schneller als beim normalen A52. Wer Wert auf eine laufruhige, ruckelfreie Darstellung legt, wird sich über die hohe Bildwiederholrate von 120 Hertz freuen. Doch die ist vermutlich Schuld daran, dass die 5G-Version im Test eine viel kürzere Akku-Laufzeit als die LTE-Variante erreicht.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Mit dem Galaxy A52 5G präsentiert Samsung ein konkurrenzfähiges Mittelklasse-Handy zu einem fairen Preis, vor allem, wenn man den langen Support-Zeitraum für das Handy bedenkt. Zu den Stärken gehört zudem auch die Kamera. Abzüge gibt es unter anderem für das fehlende 25-Watt-Netzteil im Lieferumfang.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Ausstattung: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Mit dem Galaxy A52 5G präsentiert Samsung ein konkurrenzfähiges Mittelklasse-Handy zu einem fairen Preis, vor allem, wenn man den langen Support-Zeitraum für das Handy bedenkt. Zu den Stärken gehört zudem auch die Kamera. Abzüge gibt es unter anderem für das fehlende 25-Watt-Netzteil im Lieferumfang.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Ausstattung: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: PCtipp.ch
Das Samsung Galaxy A52 kostet laut Samsungs Katalogpreis 429 Franken und ist bei verschiedenen Schweizer Händlern zu einem Strassenpreis ab ca. 385 Franken zu haben. Für diesen Preis erhalten Sie ein vielseitiges Handy mit guter Kamera und nützlichen Funktionen im Alltag. Wenn Sie Samsung-Geräte mögen, bekommen Sie hier viel Smartphone fürs Geld.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: PCtipp.ch
Das Samsung Galaxy A52 kostet laut Samsungs Katalogpreis 429 Franken und ist bei verschiedenen Schweizer Händlern zu einem Strassenpreis ab ca. 385 Franken zu haben. Für diesen Preis erhalten Sie ein vielseitiges Handy mit guter Kamera und nützlichen Funktionen im Alltag. Wenn Sie Samsung-Geräte mögen, bekommen Sie hier viel Smartphone fürs Geld.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Tech Stage
Samsung ist mit dem Galaxy A52 wieder ein tolles Smartphone der Mittelklasse und damit ein würdiger Nachfolger des Galaxy A51 für die breite Masse gelungen. Die dort schon ordentliche Kamera ist jetzt noch besser. Das OLED-Display weiß absolut zu überzeugen und der Akku hält das Handy lang am Laufen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Inside Handy
Mit dem Galaxy A52 liefert Samsung wieder einmal ein tolles Gesamtpaket ab, dass für die Masse bezahlbar bleibt. 2021 dürfte es erneut viele Aktionen geben, die sich hinsichtlich des Preises für das Smartphone gegenseitig unterbieten werden. Die ersten haben sogar schon begonnen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Stage
Samsung ist mit dem Galaxy A52 wieder ein tolles Smartphone der Mittelklasse und damit ein würdiger Nachfolger des Galaxy A51 für die breite Masse gelungen. Die dort schon ordentliche Kamera ist jetzt noch besser. Das OLED-Display weiß absolut zu überzeugen und der Akku hält das Handy lang am Laufen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Inside Handy
Mit dem Galaxy A52 liefert Samsung wieder einmal ein tolles Gesamtpaket ab, dass für die Masse bezahlbar bleibt. 2021 dürfte es erneut viele Aktionen geben, die sich hinsichtlich des Preises für das Smartphone gegenseitig unterbieten werden. Die ersten haben sogar schon begonnen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Computerbase
Ein Galaxy S21 zum halben Preis ist das Galaxy A52 5G letztlich zwar nicht, aber das deutlich günstigere Smartphone macht dem teureren reichlich Konkurrenz im eigenen Lager. Die vernünftige Wahl ist das Galaxy A52 5G, ohne dabei eklatante Abstriche machen zu müssen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2021
Quelle: Computerbase
Ein Galaxy S21 zum halben Preis ist das Galaxy A52 5G letztlich zwar nicht, aber das deutlich günstigere Smartphone macht dem teureren reichlich Konkurrenz im eigenen Lager. Die vernünftige Wahl ist das Galaxy A52 5G, ohne dabei eklatante Abstriche machen zu müssen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2021
Quelle: n-tv
Unterm Strich hat auch das Galaxy A52 das Zeug zum Bestseller. Bis auf das ausgezeichnete Display ist seine Ausstattung zwar nur guter Durchschnitt. Aber das Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ist stark und ein wasserdichtes Smartphone für 350 Euro sehr selten. Wer noch ein bisschen wartet, kann damit rechnen, das Gerät bereits für rund 300 Euro zu bekommen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2021
Quelle: n-tv
Unterm Strich hat auch das Galaxy A52 das Zeug zum Bestseller. Bis auf das ausgezeichnete Display ist seine Ausstattung zwar nur guter Durchschnitt. Aber das Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ist stark und ein wasserdichtes Smartphone für 350 Euro sehr selten. Wer noch ein bisschen wartet, kann damit rechnen, das Gerät bereits für rund 300 Euro zu bekommen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2021
Quelle: Netzwelt
Mit dem Galaxy A52 (5G) präsentiert Samsung auf den ersten Blick ein konkurrenzfähiges Mittelklasse-Handy zu einem fairen Preis, vor allem, wenn man den langen Support-Zeitraum für das Handy bedenkt. Ein großer Pluspunkt der neuen Samsung-Mittelklasse gegenüber der Konkurrenz ist aber die Update-Politik.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.03.2021
Quelle: Netzwelt
Mit dem Galaxy A52 (5G) präsentiert Samsung auf den ersten Blick ein konkurrenzfähiges Mittelklasse-Handy zu einem fairen Preis, vor allem, wenn man den langen Support-Zeitraum für das Handy bedenkt. Ein großer Pluspunkt der neuen Samsung-Mittelklasse gegenüber der Konkurrenz ist aber die Update-Politik.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.03.2021
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a solid mid-ranger with a few predictable shortcomings. It competes well in a market that’s saturated with alternatives and could be a winner for Samsung.On the whole, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a scrappy mid-ranger that offers a lot of value — far more than its predecessor. No $500 phone is without compromises, but none of the A52 5G’s shortcomings feel like total deal-breakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a solid mid-ranger with a few predictable shortcomings. It competes well in a market that’s saturated with alternatives and could be a winner for Samsung.On the whole, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a scrappy mid-ranger that offers a lot of value — far more than its predecessor. No $500 phone is without compromises, but none of the A52 5G’s shortcomings feel like total deal-breakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE
There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are very solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. While we've not put it head to head with the Pixel 5a yet, we'd imagine this statement holds true there too. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE
There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are very solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. While we've not put it head to head with the Pixel 5a yet, we'd imagine this statement holds true there too. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The only true downside of the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is its lengthy charging time, particularly when compared to its rivals, and that is largely attributable to the Samsung’s 15W in-box charger (vs. 33W for the Xiaomi and 65W for the Oppo). With a compatible 25W charger, the charging experience would likely improve significantly. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G provides more than two days of autonomy, and put in an especially good performance in our on the go tests.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.08.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The only true downside of the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is its lengthy charging time, particularly when compared to its rivals, and that is largely attributable to the Samsung’s 15W in-box charger (vs. 33W for the Xiaomi and 65W for the Oppo). With a compatible 25W charger, the charging experience would likely improve significantly. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G provides more than two days of autonomy, and put in an especially good performance in our on the go tests.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.08.2021
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
Unfortunately, the Galaxy A52 5G is just priced unfavorably. There are many better or faster 5G phones at a similar or even cheaper price out there and while the promises of very long software support may be boosting the A52 5G's value proposition it still feels your are not getting the best bang for your buck. Not least because the regular A52 with the same kind of support and largely the same feature set is that much cheaper. Samsung can make the Galaxy A52 5G an attractive offer by applying a price cut as it has done in some markets. In most places, however, you are better off spending your money elsewhere.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
Unfortunately, the Galaxy A52 5G is just priced unfavorably. There are many better or faster 5G phones at a similar or even cheaper price out there and while the promises of very long software support may be boosting the A52 5G's value proposition it still feels your are not getting the best bang for your buck. Not least because the regular A52 with the same kind of support and largely the same feature set is that much cheaper. Samsung can make the Galaxy A52 5G an attractive offer by applying a price cut as it has done in some markets. In most places, however, you are better off spending your money elsewhere.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Make Use Of EN→DE
For the most part, Samsung pulled the right strings in making the A52 an excellent midrange device; the screen is large, vibrant, and snappy, the battery life is just plain incredible, and the camera delivers sufficient quality that rounds out this phone's experience. The main competitor of this phone isn't from another brand, but from Samsung itself. The Galaxy A52 exists in a space where you can still pick up the S20 FE, and if the rumors are true, Samsung is set to release the Galaxy S21 FE later this summer, and the price difference between the S20 FE and the A52 is marginally thin, especially if you consider the promotions Samsung and its carriers run all year-round.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Make Use Of EN→DE
For the most part, Samsung pulled the right strings in making the A52 an excellent midrange device; the screen is large, vibrant, and snappy, the battery life is just plain incredible, and the camera delivers sufficient quality that rounds out this phone's experience. The main competitor of this phone isn't from another brand, but from Samsung itself. The Galaxy A52 exists in a space where you can still pick up the S20 FE, and if the rumors are true, Samsung is set to release the Galaxy S21 FE later this summer, and the price difference between the S20 FE and the A52 is marginally thin, especially if you consider the promotions Samsung and its carriers run all year-round.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
As with any phone, even a good one, not everything is roses and sunshine. The in-screen fingerprint reader is so annoying to use that I preferred to enter my PIN to unlock the phone. The mediocre macro camera seems like a frivolous add-on that is only there to boost the total number of cameras on the phone. More is definitely not better. There are many duplicate apps like Samsung's version of an internet browser and photo gallery app in addition to the ones from Google. But after two months, when I step back and consider everything, the Galaxy A52 5G is an all-around good phone with some great features and a few minor and annoying flaws. It's a solid buy for $500, but as I write this review, you can get a Galaxy A52 5G unlocked on Samsung's website for $425, which makes it even harder to pass up.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
As with any phone, even a good one, not everything is roses and sunshine. The in-screen fingerprint reader is so annoying to use that I preferred to enter my PIN to unlock the phone. The mediocre macro camera seems like a frivolous add-on that is only there to boost the total number of cameras on the phone. More is definitely not better. There are many duplicate apps like Samsung's version of an internet browser and photo gallery app in addition to the ones from Google. But after two months, when I step back and consider everything, the Galaxy A52 5G is an all-around good phone with some great features and a few minor and annoying flaws. It's a solid buy for $500, but as I write this review, you can get a Galaxy A52 5G unlocked on Samsung's website for $425, which makes it even harder to pass up.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G ($499.99) has big shoes to fill: Samsung customers are expecting a lot of value from the successor to the Galaxy A51, one of the top-selling phones of 2020. For the most part, the Galaxy A52 5G delivers, with a gorgeous 120Hz AMOLED display, 5G connectivity, an ambitious camera array, and solid battery life. What’s missing, however, is performance. The A52 5G is a bit sluggish when compared with the Google Pixel 4a 5G ($499) or even the Moto G Stylus 5G ($399.99).
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G ($499.99) has big shoes to fill: Samsung customers are expecting a lot of value from the successor to the Galaxy A51, one of the top-selling phones of 2020. For the most part, the Galaxy A52 5G delivers, with a gorgeous 120Hz AMOLED display, 5G connectivity, an ambitious camera array, and solid battery life. What’s missing, however, is performance. The A52 5G is a bit sluggish when compared with the Google Pixel 4a 5G ($499) or even the Moto G Stylus 5G ($399.99).
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The A52 5G could be brighter in most tested conditions, which is true in the video use case as well. The device does not read 60 fps UHD content, which is inconvenient for some, and its ghost touches are something gamers will notice right away. But despite a few quirks, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G delivers good quality and performance for the price. Its colors are accurate, especially in outdoor conditions, and it retains good details without degrading content, especially in direct sunlight. Web browsing feels smooth.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.06.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The A52 5G could be brighter in most tested conditions, which is true in the video use case as well. The device does not read 60 fps UHD content, which is inconvenient for some, and its ghost touches are something gamers will notice right away. But despite a few quirks, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G delivers good quality and performance for the price. Its colors are accurate, especially in outdoor conditions, and it retains good details without degrading content, especially in direct sunlight. Web browsing feels smooth.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.06.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G punched above its weight class in terms of the quality of the sound it produces in playback, and did reasonably well as a recording device too. With an exceptional artifacts score, good timbre performance, and strong spatial performance, the device provides good value in playback. As a recording device, it performed well in terms of overall timbre score, but has some shortcomings, including mono recording in the memo app and not capturing sufficient loudness in life videos.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.06.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G punched above its weight class in terms of the quality of the sound it produces in playback, and did reasonably well as a recording device too. With an exceptional artifacts score, good timbre performance, and strong spatial performance, the device provides good value in playback. As a recording device, it performed well in terms of overall timbre score, but has some shortcomings, including mono recording in the memo app and not capturing sufficient loudness in life videos.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.06.2021
Quelle: XDA Developers EN→DE
I didn’t find much to complain about with the Galaxy A52 5G. The build quality could be better, and I would have preferred a telephoto lens over the nearly-useless 5MP macro. Samsung’s software also remains as polarizing as ever — while some (like me) generally prefer One UI over stock Android, it’s definitely not a perfect experience. The abundance of features can feel overwhelming, and the advertisements in system applications like Samsung Pay and Weather are still inexcusable. Overall, the Galaxy A52 5G is one of the strongest budget phones we’ve seen yet out of Samsung, especially in the United States. It’s a great package for the typical price of $500, and if you can get it on sale, that’s even better.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.06.2021
Quelle: XDA Developers EN→DE
I didn’t find much to complain about with the Galaxy A52 5G. The build quality could be better, and I would have preferred a telephoto lens over the nearly-useless 5MP macro. Samsung’s software also remains as polarizing as ever — while some (like me) generally prefer One UI over stock Android, it’s definitely not a perfect experience. The abundance of features can feel overwhelming, and the advertisements in system applications like Samsung Pay and Weather are still inexcusable. Overall, the Galaxy A52 5G is one of the strongest budget phones we’ve seen yet out of Samsung, especially in the United States. It’s a great package for the typical price of $500, and if you can get it on sale, that’s even better.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.06.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a high-end smartphone that sits just behind the A72 5G in the South Korean manufacturer’s more affordable A-series lineup. It features an FHD+ 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and a 4500 mAh battery with 25W super-fast charging. The Android OS is powered by an octa-core processor with 6GB RAM, and there’s 128 GB of internal storage that’s expandable to 1 TB via Micro SD. The handset is also IP67 rated for water and dust resistance. For photography, the device features a quad rear camera including a 64 MP primary module and a 12 MP ultra-wide. A 5 MP macro and 5 MP depth sensor for bokeh simulation complete the shooting options. Let’s see how the device performs in our DXOMARK Camera tests.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.06.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a high-end smartphone that sits just behind the A72 5G in the South Korean manufacturer’s more affordable A-series lineup. It features an FHD+ 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and a 4500 mAh battery with 25W super-fast charging. The Android OS is powered by an octa-core processor with 6GB RAM, and there’s 128 GB of internal storage that’s expandable to 1 TB via Micro SD. The handset is also IP67 rated for water and dust resistance. For photography, the device features a quad rear camera including a 64 MP primary module and a 12 MP ultra-wide. A 5 MP macro and 5 MP depth sensor for bokeh simulation complete the shooting options. Let’s see how the device performs in our DXOMARK Camera tests.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.06.2021
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G isn’t going to blow you away with top-end specs or a remarkably affordable price, but it’s still a solid choice for a mid-range handset that can compete with the likes of the Google Pixel 4a. It’s a difficult phone to love, but if you’re looking for a lot for a lower price point than most other Samsung devices, you may enjoy what the Galaxy A52 5G has to offer.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.05.2021
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G isn’t going to blow you away with top-end specs or a remarkably affordable price, but it’s still a solid choice for a mid-range handset that can compete with the likes of the Google Pixel 4a. It’s a difficult phone to love, but if you’re looking for a lot for a lower price point than most other Samsung devices, you may enjoy what the Galaxy A52 5G has to offer.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.05.2021
Quelle: Best Products EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the best smartphone $500 can buy today. It offers top-tier features and a great user experience at an agreeable price point. I also tip my hat to Samsung for committing to provide 4 years’ worth of timely security updates for the A52. It's rare to see this level of support available for Android's cheaper phones. For comparison, a $500 budget will get you an entry-level iPhone XR with less storage (64GB), one rear-facing camera, and no 5G. The Google Pixel 4a 5G also costs the same, but it’s nowhere near as feature-packed. It isn’t waterproof, either. At this price point, the Galaxy A52 5G is the one to beat.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.05.2021
Quelle: Best Products EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the best smartphone $500 can buy today. It offers top-tier features and a great user experience at an agreeable price point. I also tip my hat to Samsung for committing to provide 4 years’ worth of timely security updates for the A52. It's rare to see this level of support available for Android's cheaper phones. For comparison, a $500 budget will get you an entry-level iPhone XR with less storage (64GB), one rear-facing camera, and no 5G. The Google Pixel 4a 5G also costs the same, but it’s nowhere near as feature-packed. It isn’t waterproof, either. At this price point, the Galaxy A52 5G is the one to beat.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.05.2021
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE
There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are very solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE
There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are very solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G gets more right than it gets wrong. It offers solid build quality, a pleasing display, excellent battery life, and a capable main camera. It's not the most performant mid-ranger out there and the secondary cameras underwhelm, but if you're in the market for a $500 phone with 5G, the Galaxy A52 5G is up there with the best.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G gets more right than it gets wrong. It offers solid build quality, a pleasing display, excellent battery life, and a capable main camera. It's not the most performant mid-ranger out there and the secondary cameras underwhelm, but if you're in the market for a $500 phone with 5G, the Galaxy A52 5G is up there with the best.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Engadget
Samsung's Galaxy A52 5G really shows how far mid-range Android phones have come. It has a great screen, decent, cameras, all-day battery life, and pretty snappy performance. The problem is that at $500, it has a lot of competition, including from Samsung itself. The S20 FE can be found new for $599, or with a discount or trade-in for as low as $399, and it has a better screen, processor, and camera setup. Add in some great phones from OnePlus in a similar range, and even the iPhone 11 for around the same price, and while the A52 5G is good, that might not be enough.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.04.2021
Quelle: Engadget
Samsung's Galaxy A52 5G really shows how far mid-range Android phones have come. It has a great screen, decent, cameras, all-day battery life, and pretty snappy performance. The problem is that at $500, it has a lot of competition, including from Samsung itself. The S20 FE can be found new for $599, or with a discount or trade-in for as low as $399, and it has a better screen, processor, and camera setup. Add in some great phones from OnePlus in a similar range, and even the iPhone 11 for around the same price, and while the A52 5G is good, that might not be enough.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.04.2021
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 5G sweats on the details, with a fine 120Hz AMOLED display, an IP67-rated body, a competent OIS-laden camera and the promise of four years of security updates. There’s better value to be had, however, if not quite the same sense of security.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 5G sweats on the details, with a fine 120Hz AMOLED display, an IP67-rated body, a competent OIS-laden camera and the promise of four years of security updates. There’s better value to be had, however, if not quite the same sense of security.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE
Samsung continues to offer up a compelling mid-range phone with a near-flagship experience in the Galaxy A52 5G. With a large 120Hz screen, 4500mAh battery that will last all day even with heavy use, it's the 5G phone under $500 to beat.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE
Samsung continues to offer up a compelling mid-range phone with a near-flagship experience in the Galaxy A52 5G. With a large 120Hz screen, 4500mAh battery that will last all day even with heavy use, it's the 5G phone under $500 to beat.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE
What I didn’t love — the cluttered software, fussy fingerprint sensor, a tendency toward oversaturated color in photos — feels more forgivable when the phone gets the nonnegotiable stuff right. The Pixel 4A 5G is probably this device’s closest competition, and it beats the A52 5G on camera quality and a cleaner UI, but it’s a smaller device without a fancy fast refresh rate screen. Depending on how you feel about either of those things, the 4A 5G might be the better pick for you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE
What I didn’t love — the cluttered software, fussy fingerprint sensor, a tendency toward oversaturated color in photos — feels more forgivable when the phone gets the nonnegotiable stuff right. The Pixel 4A 5G is probably this device’s closest competition, and it beats the A52 5G on camera quality and a cleaner UI, but it’s a smaller device without a fancy fast refresh rate screen. Depending on how you feel about either of those things, the 4A 5G might be the better pick for you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: TechTablets
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Review. An in-depth review covers, the design, battery life, benchmarks, camera samples, charge time, gaming performance, and thermals. ESR 20% discount code: MX3JL5JD
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.04.2021
Quelle: TechTablets
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Review. An in-depth review covers, the design, battery life, benchmarks, camera samples, charge time, gaming performance, and thermals. ESR 20% discount code: MX3JL5JD
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.04.2021
Quelle: Hardware Zone EN→DE
With so much to offer at under $550, phones like the Galaxy A52 and its competitors might start to eat into the appeal that flagship phones once held a strong grip. Is this the end of ultra-expensive phones? Or is this just the beginning as top-end phone models start to explore the realms of multi-displays, foldable display, rollable display and other such leading-edge experiences? We tend to think there’s a push for the latter as more brands are debuting showcase devices that we may one day pine for. Till then, the mainstream audience stands to benefit from the continual process and technological improvements to bring devices like the Samsung Galaxy A52 at ever more palatable price points.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 90% Leistung: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Hardware Zone EN→DE
With so much to offer at under $550, phones like the Galaxy A52 and its competitors might start to eat into the appeal that flagship phones once held a strong grip. Is this the end of ultra-expensive phones? Or is this just the beginning as top-end phone models start to explore the realms of multi-displays, foldable display, rollable display and other such leading-edge experiences? We tend to think there’s a push for the latter as more brands are debuting showcase devices that we may one day pine for. Till then, the mainstream audience stands to benefit from the continual process and technological improvements to bring devices like the Samsung Galaxy A52 at ever more palatable price points.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 90% Leistung: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: T3 EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is an Android handset with an excellent main camera, it has a large display with a 120Hz refresh rate, water-resistance and a long-lasting 4,500mAh battery. Granted its performance won’t blow you away but you get what you pay for there.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: T3 EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is an Android handset with an excellent main camera, it has a large display with a 120Hz refresh rate, water-resistance and a long-lasting 4,500mAh battery. Granted its performance won’t blow you away but you get what you pay for there.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE
There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are pretty solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE
There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are pretty solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
It’s worth noting right off the bat that while the A52 and A52 5G are similar in name and design. There’s more than just 5G that separates them. The one I have had in my pocket for the last week is the 5G model and all of my views relate to it alone. Keep that in mind when you’re looking for deals in the future.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
It’s worth noting right off the bat that while the A52 and A52 5G are similar in name and design. There’s more than just 5G that separates them. The one I have had in my pocket for the last week is the 5G model and all of my views relate to it alone. Keep that in mind when you’re looking for deals in the future.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is here in a slew of different colors and bringing a handful of upgrades to a line that desperately needed them to stay competitive. It’s a €350 midranger with a pretty OK camera, a beautiful, 90 Hz AMOLED screen, and performance that… you know — will do the job.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is here in a slew of different colors and bringing a handful of upgrades to a line that desperately needed them to stay competitive. It’s a €350 midranger with a pretty OK camera, a beautiful, 90 Hz AMOLED screen, and performance that… you know — will do the job.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: XDA Developers EN→DE
Prices for major markets like the US and India have not been announced yet, but the Galaxy A52 5G is selling for around the equivalent of $510 in Europe, the UK, and Hong Kong. At this price, the phone should be a top contender for one of the best mid-tier phones — in North America and South Korea. Samsung has one of the widest retail networks for an Android smartphone brand, and in a fair few places, the Galaxy A52 might be the only viable option that consumers will be able to buy. In markets like Asia, the Galaxy A52 5G will have a lot of competition, though Samsung’s combination of proven quality, brand reputation, and marketing prowess should make this another top seller.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.03.2021
Quelle: XDA Developers EN→DE
Prices for major markets like the US and India have not been announced yet, but the Galaxy A52 5G is selling for around the equivalent of $510 in Europe, the UK, and Hong Kong. At this price, the phone should be a top contender for one of the best mid-tier phones — in North America and South Korea. Samsung has one of the widest retail networks for an Android smartphone brand, and in a fair few places, the Galaxy A52 might be the only viable option that consumers will be able to buy. In markets like Asia, the Galaxy A52 5G will have a lot of competition, though Samsung’s combination of proven quality, brand reputation, and marketing prowess should make this another top seller.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.03.2021
Quelle: Pocket Lint EN→DE
An excellent mid-range phone, packed with a great display, plenty of power, and waterproofing to help it stand out from the crowd. Running Samsung's latest software, it's an affordable way to get the latest Samsung experience with little major compromise.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
The A52 5G certainly comes with plenty packed in, and if you’re after that Samsung name – and the look that comes with it – then, following a few day's use, this appears to be a good pick.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G brings a variety of top-end features you'd normally expect to be included on flagship phones to its cheaper variant including 5G connectivity and an improved screen technology. This may be one to watch if you're after a cheaper Samsung phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Yugatech
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Pocket Lint EN→DE
An excellent mid-range phone, packed with a great display, plenty of power, and waterproofing to help it stand out from the crowd. Running Samsung's latest software, it's an affordable way to get the latest Samsung experience with little major compromise.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
The A52 5G certainly comes with plenty packed in, and if you’re after that Samsung name – and the look that comes with it – then, following a few day's use, this appears to be a good pick.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G brings a variety of top-end features you'd normally expect to be included on flagship phones to its cheaper variant including 5G connectivity and an improved screen technology. This may be one to watch if you're after a cheaper Samsung phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Yugatech
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 5G will be one of Samsung's 2021 mid-range offerings, along with its larger variant – the Galaxy A72 5G. Over its predecessor from last year, the Galaxy A52 5G will have a smoother 90Hz display, which will also feature great contrast and colors thanks to its AMOLED technology. In addition, A52 5G owners will enjoy the phone's modern design with minimal bezels, curved edges, and versatile quad-camera setup.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.02.2021
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 5G will be one of Samsung's 2021 mid-range offerings, along with its larger variant – the Galaxy A72 5G. Over its predecessor from last year, the Galaxy A52 5G will have a smoother 90Hz display, which will also feature great contrast and colors thanks to its AMOLED technology. In addition, A52 5G owners will enjoy the phone's modern design with minimal bezels, curved edges, and versatile quad-camera setup.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.02.2021
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 83% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 88% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 83% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 88% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; long battery life. Negative: Slow charging; average cameras.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.11.2021
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; long battery life. Negative: Slow charging; average cameras.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.11.2021
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE
Positive: Excellent display; high performance; great speakers; long battery life; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.03.2021
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE
Positive: Excellent display; high performance; great speakers; long battery life; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.03.2021
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; long battery life; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; long battery life; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: PC Guia PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 80%
Quelle: PC Guia PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 80%
Quelle: 4G News PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 55% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: 4G News PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 55% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Target HD PT→DE
Positive: Nice overall performance; elegant design; great built quality; good cameras; beautiful display; waterproof IP67. Negative: Average autonomy; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.05.2024
Quelle: Target HD PT→DE
Positive: Nice overall performance; elegant design; great built quality; good cameras; beautiful display; waterproof IP67. Negative: Average autonomy; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.05.2024
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 62% Ausstattung: 77%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 62% Ausstattung: 77%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 75% Ausstattung: 85% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 75% Ausstattung: 85% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Leistung: 82% Mobilität: 84% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Leistung: 82% Mobilität: 84% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 82% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 86%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 82% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 86%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 89% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 86%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 89% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 86%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Positive: High performance; long battery life. Negative: No headphone jack.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Positive: High performance; long battery life. Negative: No headphone jack.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Geeks and Com FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Geeks and Com FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Journal du Geek FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Journal du Geek FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: 01Net FR→DE
Positive: Excellent display; beautiful design. Negative: Average autonomy; slow charging; poor cameras; low performance; many bloatwares.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.06.2021
Quelle: 01Net FR→DE
Positive: Excellent display; beautiful design. Negative: Average autonomy; slow charging; poor cameras; low performance; many bloatwares.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.06.2021
Quelle: Fredzone FR→DE
Positive: Nice display; decent processor; great cameras; good price. Negative: Unsupported 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2021
Quelle: Fredzone FR→DE
Positive: Nice display; decent processor; great cameras; good price. Negative: Unsupported 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2021
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 21.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 21.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE
Positive: Attractive price; support 5G; powerful hardware; high performance; waterproof.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.12.2021
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE
Positive: Attractive price; support 5G; powerful hardware; high performance; waterproof.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.12.2021
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; great main camera; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.04.2021
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; great main camera; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.04.2021
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail RU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail RU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: DGL.ru RU→DE
Positive: Waterproof and dust avoiding; excellent display; nice cameras; great speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.03.2021
Quelle: DGL.ru RU→DE
Positive: Waterproof and dust avoiding; excellent display; nice cameras; great speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.03.2021
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 88% Ausstattung: 85% Mobilität: 89% Gehäuse: 87%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 88% Ausstattung: 85% Mobilität: 89% Gehäuse: 87%
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Support 5G; nice quad cameras; decent processor; waterproof.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 08.04.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Support 5G; nice quad cameras; decent processor; waterproof.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 08.04.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; excellent display; high performance; excellent cameras; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.04.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; excellent display; high performance; excellent cameras; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.04.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Excellent display; powerful processor; nice performance. Negative: Old design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.03.2021
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; decent hardware; nice performance; good price; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 30.03.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Excellent display; powerful processor; nice performance. Negative: Old design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.03.2021
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; decent hardware; nice performance; good price; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 30.03.2021
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 21.02.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 21.02.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Lyd og Billede DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Lyd og Billede DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Mere Mobil.dk DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Mere Mobil.dk DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Arena IT →DE
Positive: Decent hardware; nice gaming performance; nice display; long battery life; headphone jack.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.08.2021
Quelle: Arena IT →DE
Positive: Decent hardware; nice gaming performance; nice display; long battery life; headphone jack.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.08.2021
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE
Positive: Excellent display; powerful processor; long battery life; elegant design. Negative: High price; plastic case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.04.2021
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE
Positive: Excellent display; powerful processor; long battery life; elegant design. Negative: High price; plastic case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.04.2021
Quelle: Puhelinvertailu →DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Puhelinvertailu →DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Samsung Galaxy A72 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A72 5GProzessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 750G 5G
Grafikkarte: Qualcomm Adreno 619
Bildschirm: 6.70 Zoll, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.203kg
Preis: 600 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
Last year, the midrange Galaxy A71 was a success and became quite popular. Now, its successor is here, bringing, at least at first look, significant improvements in the display with a 90Hz high refresh rate, a bigger 5,000mAh battery, and a versatile camera system. All of these cool features are packed under a gorgeous new look both the A72 and the A52 sport, with fresh and youthful colors. Here’s our hands-on experience with the new midranger. We noticed a smaller improvement in the processor and its performance is not a giant step forward from the Galaxy A71, but despite that, the A72 is a good investment for anyone wanting a smooth Samsung phone for an affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
Last year, the budget-friendly Galaxy A71 was a success and became quite popular. We are now expecting its successor, the Galaxy A72, to soon hit the market scene, offering, just like its predecessor, a good balance between quality and price. The phone is expected to come in two variants, connectivity-wise: a 5G version and an LTE-only version. Here, we will focus on the 5G variant of the phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.02.2021
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 75% Bildschirm: 88% Mobilität: 87% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; stereo speakers; mini jack. Negative: Poor display; unsupported 5G; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.10.2022
Samsung Galaxy A72
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A72Prozessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 720G
Grafikkarte: Qualcomm Adreno 618
Bildschirm: 6.70 Zoll, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.203kg
Preis: 449 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Samsung hat sein Mittelklasse-Topmodell neu aufgelegt: Das Galaxy A72 ist nochmals besser geworden als der bereits starke Vorgänger und besitzt unter anderem den größeren Akku und bessere Kameras. Wie der Test zeigt, dürfte das Galaxy A72 dieses Jahr auch der Standard sein, an dem sich alle Mittelklasse-Konkurrenten messen lassen müssen.
Quelle: Area DVD
Statt es wie so oft als Zehnkämpfer zu platzieren, setzen sie klare Schwerpunkte und verzichten stattdessen auf 5G und einen Hightech-Prozessor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.11.2021
Quelle: Area DVD
Statt es wie so oft als Zehnkämpfer zu platzieren, setzen sie klare Schwerpunkte und verzichten stattdessen auf 5G und einen Hightech-Prozessor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.11.2021
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A72 liefert eine ordentliche Leistung im Labor ab. Auf der Positivliste stehen die sehr lange Akkulaufzeit, das helle und große OLED-Display sowie die – abgesehen vom Blitz – gute Kamera mit 3-fach optischem Zoom. Dass 5G nicht eingebaut ist, könnte Kunden mit Telekom- und Vodafone-Tarif stören. Gegenüber dem kleineren Galaxy A52 (Note 2,3) spricht vor allem die Tele-Kamera und der stärkere Akku für das A72.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A72 liefert eine ordentliche Leistung im Labor ab. Auf der Positivliste stehen die sehr lange Akkulaufzeit, das helle und große OLED-Display sowie die – abgesehen vom Blitz – gute Kamera mit 3-fach optischem Zoom. Dass 5G nicht eingebaut ist, könnte Kunden mit Telekom- und Vodafone-Tarif stören. Gegenüber dem kleineren Galaxy A52 (Note 2,3) spricht vor allem die Tele-Kamera und der stärkere Akku für das A72.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88%
Quelle: Curved
Was soll ich sagen? Samsung macht so vieles richtig richtig gut. Akku-Laufzeit, Display und die Kamera gefallen im Review des Galaxy A72.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.07.2021
Quelle: Curved
Was soll ich sagen? Samsung macht so vieles richtig richtig gut. Akku-Laufzeit, Display und die Kamera gefallen im Review des Galaxy A72.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.07.2021
Quelle: Tech Stage
Das Samsung Galaxy A72 ist ein würdiger Nachfolger des erfolgreichen A71 – auch wenn es beim Thema Chipsatz kaum Fortschritt gibt, was grundsätzlich immer Fragen aufwirft.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Tech Stage
Das Samsung Galaxy A72 ist ein würdiger Nachfolger des erfolgreichen A71 – auch wenn es beim Thema Chipsatz kaum Fortschritt gibt, was grundsätzlich immer Fragen aufwirft.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung Galaxy A72 ist ein gelungenes Mittelklasse-Smartphone. Der mit Abstand größte Kritikpunkt an dem Gerät ist der vergleichsweise langsame Prozessor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung Galaxy A72 ist ein gelungenes Mittelklasse-Smartphone. Der mit Abstand größte Kritikpunkt an dem Gerät ist der vergleichsweise langsame Prozessor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Insgesamt ist das Samsung Galaxy A72 ein exzellentes Mittelklasse-Handy: Das Display ist top, das Kamera-Setup sehr vielseitig, es gibt eine tolle Akkulaufzeit und Unterstützung für bis zu vier Jahre Sicherheitsupdates. Das alles kauft Ihr für nur 449 Euro!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Insgesamt ist das Samsung Galaxy A72 ein exzellentes Mittelklasse-Handy: Das Display ist top, das Kamera-Setup sehr vielseitig, es gibt eine tolle Akkulaufzeit und Unterstützung für bis zu vier Jahre Sicherheitsupdates. Das alles kauft Ihr für nur 449 Euro!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Futurezone.at
Das Samsung Galaxy A72 kann tatsächlich als "awesome" bezeichnet werden. Es bietet alles, was ein gutes Smartphone im Jahr 2021 ausmacht: Top-Display mit erhöhter Refresh-Rate, ausreichend Leistung, ausdauernder Akku und eine Kameraqualität, die sich sehen lassen kann.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2021
Quelle: Futurezone.at
Das Samsung Galaxy A72 kann tatsächlich als "awesome" bezeichnet werden. Es bietet alles, was ein gutes Smartphone im Jahr 2021 ausmacht: Top-Display mit erhöhter Refresh-Rate, ausreichend Leistung, ausdauernder Akku und eine Kameraqualität, die sich sehen lassen kann.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2021
Quelle: Teltarif
Das Samsung Galaxy A72 ist ein anständiges Handy, mit dem Budget-Orientierte nicht viel falsch machen können. Überraschend gut funktioniert die Hauptkamera bei schlechtem Licht, der Nachtmodus sorgt für weitere ansehnliche Optimierungen. Der große Akku hat ein gutes Durchhaltevermögen, das Display ist überdurchschnittlich hell. Kritik gibts bei der Kunststoff-Rückseite, die keinen hochwertigen Eindruck macht und dem Selfiekamera-Nachtmodus, der unter unseren Laborbedingungen nur mit großen Mängeln abschnitt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Preis: 92% Leistung: 50% Bildschirm: 880% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Teltarif
Das Samsung Galaxy A72 ist ein anständiges Handy, mit dem Budget-Orientierte nicht viel falsch machen können. Überraschend gut funktioniert die Hauptkamera bei schlechtem Licht, der Nachtmodus sorgt für weitere ansehnliche Optimierungen. Der große Akku hat ein gutes Durchhaltevermögen, das Display ist überdurchschnittlich hell. Kritik gibts bei der Kunststoff-Rückseite, die keinen hochwertigen Eindruck macht und dem Selfiekamera-Nachtmodus, der unter unseren Laborbedingungen nur mit großen Mängeln abschnitt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Preis: 92% Leistung: 50% Bildschirm: 880% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Inside Handy
Das Samsung Galaxy A71 stand vergangenes Jahr im Schatten des unglaublich beliebten und erfolgreichen Galaxy A51. Und das wird sich auch 2021 nicht ändern. Samsung hat mit dem Galaxy A72 ein tolles Smartphone entwickelt. Es ist im Vergleich zu seinem Vorgänger wasserdicht, hat ein tolles Display, eine lange Akkulaufzeit und gute Kameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Inside Handy
Das Samsung Galaxy A71 stand vergangenes Jahr im Schatten des unglaublich beliebten und erfolgreichen Galaxy A51. Und das wird sich auch 2021 nicht ändern. Samsung hat mit dem Galaxy A72 ein tolles Smartphone entwickelt. Es ist im Vergleich zu seinem Vorgänger wasserdicht, hat ein tolles Display, eine lange Akkulaufzeit und gute Kameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A72 liefert eine ordentliche Leistung im Labor ab. Auf der Positivliste stehen die sehr lange Akku-Laufzeit, das helle und große OLED-Display sowie die – abgesehen vom Blitz – gute Kamera mit dreifach optischem Zoom. Dass 5G nicht eingebaut ist, könnte Kunden mit Telekom- und Vodafone-Tarif stören. Gegenüber dem kleineren Galaxy A52 (Note 2,3) spricht vor allem die Tele-Kamera und der stärkere Akku für das A72.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A72 liefert eine ordentliche Leistung im Labor ab. Auf der Positivliste stehen die sehr lange Akku-Laufzeit, das helle und große OLED-Display sowie die – abgesehen vom Blitz – gute Kamera mit dreifach optischem Zoom. Dass 5G nicht eingebaut ist, könnte Kunden mit Telekom- und Vodafone-Tarif stören. Gegenüber dem kleineren Galaxy A52 (Note 2,3) spricht vor allem die Tele-Kamera und der stärkere Akku für das A72.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88%
Quelle: A1 Blog
Was Samsung mit dem Galaxy S21 begonnen hat, setzen sie beim Galaxy A72 konsequent fort: Auch bei diesem Modell wird auf das neue, mit dem S21 eingeführte Design gesetzt. Also vor allem auf den schön integrierten Kamera-Bump samt Metallring um jede Linse, um deren Bedeutung nochmal extra zu betonen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.03.2021
Quelle: A1 Blog
Was Samsung mit dem Galaxy S21 begonnen hat, setzen sie beim Galaxy A72 konsequent fort: Auch bei diesem Modell wird auf das neue, mit dem S21 eingeführte Design gesetzt. Also vor allem auf den schön integrierten Kamera-Bump samt Metallring um jede Linse, um deren Bedeutung nochmal extra zu betonen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.03.2021
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
Although it overall behind the Oppo Reno6 5G and the Xiaomi 11T, which both offer a better charging experience, the Samsung Galaxy A72 battery has the best autonomy in its segment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.12.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
Although it overall behind the Oppo Reno6 5G and the Xiaomi 11T, which both offer a better charging experience, the Samsung Galaxy A72 battery has the best autonomy in its segment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.12.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
Announced in March 2021, the Snapdragon 720G-powered Samsung Galaxy A72 looks like an enticing option in the High-end ($400-599) segment, offering a comprehensive camera setup with a Quad-Bayer sensor in the primary module as well as a 3x tele, a 12 MP ultra-wide, and a dedicated macro camera. Let’s see how it fares in the DXOMARK Camera test protocol.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.08.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
Announced in March 2021, the Snapdragon 720G-powered Samsung Galaxy A72 looks like an enticing option in the High-end ($400-599) segment, offering a comprehensive camera setup with a Quad-Bayer sensor in the primary module as well as a 3x tele, a 12 MP ultra-wide, and a dedicated macro camera. Let’s see how it fares in the DXOMARK Camera test protocol.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.08.2021
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
As it turns out, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is not too different from the Galaxy A52, and that's a problem. The telephoto camera is a nice addition but I didn't find it very useful since its image quality was average at best. Other than this, you're paying a premium over the Galaxy A52 for a slightly larger battery and the bundled 25W charger. It's hard to justify spending at least Rs. 34,999 for the Galaxy A72 when you can get nearly the same performance and features with the Galaxy A52 at Rs. 26,499, and some phones priced under Rs. 30,000 offer even better specifications and capabilities. If the Samsung name and features such as the IP rating and stereo speakers are what drew you towards the Galaxy A72, I'd suggest buying the Galaxy A52 instead and saving some money. If you absolutely want to spend more, then any of the above competitors would be a better buy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 60% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
As it turns out, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is not too different from the Galaxy A52, and that's a problem. The telephoto camera is a nice addition but I didn't find it very useful since its image quality was average at best. Other than this, you're paying a premium over the Galaxy A52 for a slightly larger battery and the bundled 25W charger. It's hard to justify spending at least Rs. 34,999 for the Galaxy A72 when you can get nearly the same performance and features with the Galaxy A52 at Rs. 26,499, and some phones priced under Rs. 30,000 offer even better specifications and capabilities. If the Samsung name and features such as the IP rating and stereo speakers are what drew you towards the Galaxy A72, I'd suggest buying the Galaxy A52 instead and saving some money. If you absolutely want to spend more, then any of the above competitors would be a better buy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 60% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE
We think Samsung has shown some major guts in launching the Galaxy A72 with a starting price of Rs. 34,999. The phone not only comes with an older processor but also does not really bring anything too unique to the table. Yes, we love the design; the cameras and display are very good, and the battery life is impressive, but there is a lot of competition lurking around at that price point. There is the Mi 11X which comes with a Snapdragon 870 at around Rs 30,000, as does the iQOO 7. And well, there will be those who might think of the OnePlus 9R, the Vivo X60, which cost a little more but come with better processors and equally formidable specs. And well, all of those worthies also bring 5G to the table, which is a welcome bonus.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Preis: 60% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE
We think Samsung has shown some major guts in launching the Galaxy A72 with a starting price of Rs. 34,999. The phone not only comes with an older processor but also does not really bring anything too unique to the table. Yes, we love the design; the cameras and display are very good, and the battery life is impressive, but there is a lot of competition lurking around at that price point. There is the Mi 11X which comes with a Snapdragon 870 at around Rs 30,000, as does the iQOO 7. And well, there will be those who might think of the OnePlus 9R, the Vivo X60, which cost a little more but come with better processors and equally formidable specs. And well, all of those worthies also bring 5G to the table, which is a welcome bonus.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Preis: 60% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
The Galaxy A72 is aimed at those who have a budget of higher than Rs 35,000, and want a phone with a good camera. The phone is also more affordable compared to other mid-range flagships such as vivo X60 (Rs 39,990), OnePlus 9R (Rs 39,999). However, the recently launched Mi 11X costs Rs 29,999 and undercuts the A72 in pricing.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.05.2021
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
The Galaxy A72 is aimed at those who have a budget of higher than Rs 35,000, and want a phone with a good camera. The phone is also more affordable compared to other mid-range flagships such as vivo X60 (Rs 39,990), OnePlus 9R (Rs 39,999). However, the recently launched Mi 11X costs Rs 29,999 and undercuts the A72 in pricing.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.05.2021
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
So bottom line then - just like the Galaxy A52, the A72 is a truly unique package, even on the current over-saturated mid-ranger scene. That being said, its value relies on a very particular mix of features. If it just happens to be something that resonates with you, there really is no reason to look elsewhere.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
So bottom line then - just like the Galaxy A52, the A72 is a truly unique package, even on the current over-saturated mid-ranger scene. That being said, its value relies on a very particular mix of features. If it just happens to be something that resonates with you, there really is no reason to look elsewhere.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE
Now that we’ve talked about almost everything, let’s finally focus on price. The Samsung Galaxy A72 is officially available for PHP 23,990. And as I’ve mentioned, it’s quite in a risky spot because first, it only got minimal improvements from its predecessor the A71, then there’s the competition in its price range with other phones offering better performance and cameras. It does however give the advantage of being a familiar Samsung device with an attractive design and large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2021
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE
Now that we’ve talked about almost everything, let’s finally focus on price. The Samsung Galaxy A72 is officially available for PHP 23,990. And as I’ve mentioned, it’s quite in a risky spot because first, it only got minimal improvements from its predecessor the A71, then there’s the competition in its price range with other phones offering better performance and cameras. It does however give the advantage of being a familiar Samsung device with an attractive design and large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2021
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE
The Galaxy A72 nails the basics: you get a sublime 90Hz AMOLED display, minimal design with pastel hues, robust hardware, reliable cameras at the back, a 5000mAh battery, and long-term software updates. But the fact that there's no 5G here makes it a non-starter in global markets, and you also have to contend with a lot of bloatware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE
The Galaxy A72 nails the basics: you get a sublime 90Hz AMOLED display, minimal design with pastel hues, robust hardware, reliable cameras at the back, a 5000mAh battery, and long-term software updates. But the fact that there's no 5G here makes it a non-starter in global markets, and you also have to contend with a lot of bloatware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
Our review of the Galaxy A72 for the Philippines shows that the phablet is the most value-packed Samsung mid-range phone to date. Additions like a bigger battery, telephoto camera, high refresh rate, and an IP rating made the Galaxy A72 a compelling offering—and arguably one of Samsung’s best mid-range phones in recent memory.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE
In our opinion, the Galaxy A52 is a much better pick than the Galaxy A72 as both of them have almost everything in common except a camera sensor, and display & battery size. The Galaxy A72 is also a decent phone but at that price, you have better options and even the differences between the two are not worth spending Rs 8500 more on the Galaxy A72.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
Our review of the Galaxy A72 for the Philippines shows that the phablet is the most value-packed Samsung mid-range phone to date. Additions like a bigger battery, telephoto camera, high refresh rate, and an IP rating made the Galaxy A72 a compelling offering—and arguably one of Samsung’s best mid-range phones in recent memory.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE
In our opinion, the Galaxy A52 is a much better pick than the Galaxy A72 as both of them have almost everything in common except a camera sensor, and display & battery size. The Galaxy A72 is also a decent phone but at that price, you have better options and even the differences between the two are not worth spending Rs 8500 more on the Galaxy A72.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Quelle: Lowyat.net EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A72 is a cheery phone, or at least that’s the picture the company wants to paint for it. While the names of its colours can rub people the wrong way (it certainly did for me), it’s difficult to counter the point that the phone is a fine mid-range device, at least by today’s standards. The unique back is a minor plus point, but the IP67 rating is, in my opinion, the bigger and better deal.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2021
Quelle: Lowyat.net EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A72 is a cheery phone, or at least that’s the picture the company wants to paint for it. While the names of its colours can rub people the wrong way (it certainly did for me), it’s difficult to counter the point that the phone is a fine mid-range device, at least by today’s standards. The unique back is a minor plus point, but the IP67 rating is, in my opinion, the bigger and better deal.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2021
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
Absolutely – but the price is obviously at a premium here since you’re getting the best experience available on a mid-range smartphone. At RM1,899 – I think it’s a little steep and inching close to the Galaxy S20 FE 4G’s current price of RM2,099.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.03.2021
Quelle: KL Gadget Guy EN→DE
I can’t deny that there’s a bunch of important upgrades and the Galaxy A72 does have a lot to offer, but you may look the other way if you’re aiming for a 5G phone. Apart from that, the phone looks great, performs well and has a long-lasting battery life. It’s a decent phone if you don’t mind the lacking performance in lowlight photography and the absence of 5G support.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
Absolutely – but the price is obviously at a premium here since you’re getting the best experience available on a mid-range smartphone. At RM1,899 – I think it’s a little steep and inching close to the Galaxy S20 FE 4G’s current price of RM2,099.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.03.2021
Quelle: KL Gadget Guy EN→DE
I can’t deny that there’s a bunch of important upgrades and the Galaxy A72 does have a lot to offer, but you may look the other way if you’re aiming for a 5G phone. Apart from that, the phone looks great, performs well and has a long-lasting battery life. It’s a decent phone if you don’t mind the lacking performance in lowlight photography and the absence of 5G support.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
Last year, the midrange Galaxy A71 was a success and became quite popular. Now, its successor is here, bringing significant improvements to the table, with a smooth 90Hz high refresh rate, a bigger 5,000mAh battery, and a versatile camera system. All of these cool features are packed under a gorgeous new look the Galaxy A72 sports, with fresh and youthful colors. There is a smaller improvement in the processor capabilities and its performance is not a giant step forward from the Galaxy A71, but despite that, the A72 is a good investment for anyone wanting a smooth Samsung phone, with great battery life and a capable camera for the affordable price of $430.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
Last year, the midrange Galaxy A71 was a success and became quite popular. Now, its successor is here, bringing significant improvements to the table, with a smooth 90Hz high refresh rate, a bigger 5,000mAh battery, and a versatile camera system. All of these cool features are packed under a gorgeous new look the Galaxy A72 sports, with fresh and youthful colors. There is a smaller improvement in the processor capabilities and its performance is not a giant step forward from the Galaxy A71, but despite that, the A72 is a good investment for anyone wanting a smooth Samsung phone, with great battery life and a capable camera for the affordable price of $430.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
The Galaxy A72, like the Galaxy A52, is a mid-range phone that offers a high-end experience. You get an excellent display with 90Hz refresh rate that makes for smooth scrolling and animations, water and dust resistance, stereo speakers, a zoom camera capable of up to 30x magnification, the latest software out of the box along with a guarantee of three major OS upgrades, and mostly excellent performance with the Snapdragon 720G processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.03.2021
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
The Galaxy A72, like the Galaxy A52, is a mid-range phone that offers a high-end experience. You get an excellent display with 90Hz refresh rate that makes for smooth scrolling and animations, water and dust resistance, stereo speakers, a zoom camera capable of up to 30x magnification, the latest software out of the box along with a guarantee of three major OS upgrades, and mostly excellent performance with the Snapdragon 720G processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.03.2021
Quelle: Engadget
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.03.2021
Quelle: Engadget
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.03.2021
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 88% Mobilität: 93% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 88% Mobilität: 93% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Zona Movilidad ES→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; stylish design. Negative: Average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.05.2021
Quelle: Zona Movilidad ES→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; stylish design. Negative: Average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.05.2021
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE
Positive: Large battery capacity; quick charging; good price; excellent display; nice selfie camera. Negative: Unsupported 5G; poor main camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.04.2021
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE
Positive: Large battery capacity; quick charging; good price; excellent display; nice selfie camera. Negative: Unsupported 5G; poor main camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.04.2021
Quelle: Android Geek PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Android Geek PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: High gaming performance; long battery life; unsupported waterproof and dust avoiding; great speakers. Negative: Heavy and bulky; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.05.2021
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: High gaming performance; long battery life; unsupported waterproof and dust avoiding; great speakers. Negative: Heavy and bulky; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.05.2021
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 70% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 70% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 77%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 77%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Positive: Support 5G; decent autonomy; nice display. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.04.2021
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Positive: Support 5G; decent autonomy; nice display. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.04.2021
Quelle: Computer Totaal NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Computer Totaal NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Positive: Very long battery life; nice cameras; good support. Negative: Poor display; unsupported 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.05.2021
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Positive: Very long battery life; nice cameras; good support. Negative: Poor display; unsupported 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.05.2021
Quelle: Les Mobiles FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Les Mobiles FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; nice cameras; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.06.2021
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; nice cameras; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.06.2021
Quelle: Antyweb PL→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; stereo speakers; waterproof IP67. Negative: Weak processor; plastic case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.04.2021
Quelle: Antyweb PL→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; stereo speakers; waterproof IP67. Negative: Weak processor; plastic case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.04.2021
Quelle: Chip Online TR TR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Chip Online TR TR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Log.com.tr TR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 26.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: Log.com.tr TR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 26.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; nice display; big screen; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.07.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; nice display; big screen; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.07.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.05.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.05.2021
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; excellent display; big screen; nice gaming performance; decent quad cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.04.2021
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; excellent display; big screen; nice gaming performance; decent quad cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.04.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Impressive battery life; attractive design; great built quality; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Impressive battery life; attractive design; great built quality; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; nice cameras; decent hardware; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.04.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; nice cameras; decent hardware; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.04.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Large battery capacity; nice gaming performance; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.03.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Large battery capacity; nice gaming performance; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.03.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; good price; waterproof.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; good price; waterproof.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Good price; waterproof and dust avoiding; nice display; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.03.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Good price; waterproof and dust avoiding; nice display; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.03.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; excellent cameras; long battery life; stylish design; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.03.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; excellent cameras; long battery life; stylish design; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.03.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; excellent display; high performance; great cameras; large battery capacity; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.03.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; great built quality; decent cameras; nice display.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.03.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; excellent display; high performance; great cameras; large battery capacity; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.03.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; great built quality; decent cameras; nice display.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.03.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; nice display; large battery capacity; quick charging; great quad cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; nice display; large battery capacity; quick charging; great quad cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Jagat Review ID→DE
Positive: Impressive battery life; attractive design; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.03.2021
Quelle: Jagat Review ID→DE
Positive: Impressive battery life; attractive design; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.03.2021
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74%
Quelle: Arena IT →DE
Positive: Big screen; beautiful display; high autonomy; great speakers; waterproof IP67; headphone jack; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.09.2021
Quelle: Arena IT →DE
Positive: Big screen; beautiful display; high autonomy; great speakers; waterproof IP67; headphone jack; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.09.2021
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE
Positive: High performance; great autonomy; nice cameras; attractive price. Negative: Poor display; mediocre design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.07.2021
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE
Positive: High performance; great autonomy; nice cameras; attractive price. Negative: Poor display; mediocre design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.07.2021
Samsung Galaxy A52
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A52Prozessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 720G
Grafikkarte: Qualcomm Adreno 618
Bildschirm: 6.50 Zoll, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.189kg
Preis: 409 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Wer auf 5G verzichten kann, erhält das Samsung Galaxy A52 je nach Ausstattung circa 70 Euro günstiger. Dafür ist zwar ein älteres SoC verbaut, die Wahlmöglichkeit aus zwei Speichervarianten bleibt aber bestehen. Was die stärkere davon leistet, betrachten wir in unserem Testbericht.
Quelle: Computerbild
Die Unterschiede zwischen beiden Generationen sind gering. Doch dank leicht besserer Kamera (vermutlich durch weiterentwickelter Bildverarbeitung), längeren Updates und 5G geht das Galaxy A53 als Sieger aus dem Vergleich hervor. Wer aber Wert auf Tempo legt, greift lieber zu einer anderen Alternative: Das Galaxy A52s hat einen weitaus schnelleren Prozessor als das A53. Vor der Kaufentscheidung empfiehlt sich auch ein Preisvergleich. Zum Testzeitpunkt gab es das Galaxy A53 ab 350 Euro, das Galaxy A52 ab 260 Euro und das Galaxy A52s ab 320 Euro (Stand: 21. April 2022).
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Computerbild
Die Unterschiede zwischen beiden Generationen sind gering. Doch dank leicht besserer Kamera (vermutlich durch weiterentwickelter Bildverarbeitung), längeren Updates und 5G geht das Galaxy A53 als Sieger aus dem Vergleich hervor. Wer aber Wert auf Tempo legt, greift lieber zu einer anderen Alternative: Das Galaxy A52s hat einen weitaus schnelleren Prozessor als das A53. Vor der Kaufentscheidung empfiehlt sich auch ein Preisvergleich. Zum Testzeitpunkt gab es das Galaxy A53 ab 350 Euro, das Galaxy A52 ab 260 Euro und das Galaxy A52s ab 320 Euro (Stand: 21. April 2022).
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52 hat Samsung ein Ass im Ärmel: Display, Design und Kamera decken alle normalen Alltagsansprüche gut ab. Das Display ist heller als das der Konkurrenz in der Preisklasse. Wer keine besonderen Anforderungen etwa bezüglich Zoom oder hohem Arbeitstempo stellt, wird damit zufrieden sein. Die Kamera ist mehr als nur schnappschusstauglich, macht sogar bei wenig Licht passable Fotos. Der Prozessor ist trotz Steigerung gegenüber dem Vorgänger immer noch spürbar langsamer als bei Geräten der Oberklasse. Das Kaufargument für viele dürfte jedoch das wasserdichte Gehäuse sein. Klar ist: Samsung will mit dem Galaxy A52 die vor allem im Preis-Leistungs-Vergleich bislang oft attraktivere Chinakonkurrenz kleinhalten – gerade Xiaomi rückt den Koreanern zunehmend auf die Pelle. Ob sich der Kauf lohnt, entscheidet am Ende der Preis: Aktuell bietet Samsung selbst für einen geringen Aufpreis die bessere Alternative ...
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.01.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52 hat Samsung ein Ass im Ärmel: Display, Design und Kamera decken alle normalen Alltagsansprüche gut ab. Das Display ist heller als das der Konkurrenz in der Preisklasse. Wer keine besonderen Anforderungen etwa bezüglich Zoom oder hohem Arbeitstempo stellt, wird damit zufrieden sein. Die Kamera ist mehr als nur schnappschusstauglich, macht sogar bei wenig Licht passable Fotos. Der Prozessor ist trotz Steigerung gegenüber dem Vorgänger immer noch spürbar langsamer als bei Geräten der Oberklasse. Das Kaufargument für viele dürfte jedoch das wasserdichte Gehäuse sein. Klar ist: Samsung will mit dem Galaxy A52 die vor allem im Preis-Leistungs-Vergleich bislang oft attraktivere Chinakonkurrenz kleinhalten – gerade Xiaomi rückt den Koreanern zunehmend auf die Pelle. Ob sich der Kauf lohnt, entscheidet am Ende der Preis: Aktuell bietet Samsung selbst für einen geringen Aufpreis die bessere Alternative ...
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.01.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52 hat Samsung ein Ass im Ärmel: Display, Design und Kamera decken alle normalen Alltagsansprüche gut ab. Das Display ist heller als das der Konkurrenz in der Preisklasse. Wer keine besonderen Anforderungen etwa bezüglich Zoom oder hohem Arbeitstempo stellt, wird damit zufrieden sein. Die Kamera ist mehr als nur schnappschusstauglich, macht sogar bei wenig Licht passable Fotos. Der Prozessor ist trotz Steigerung gegenüber dem Vorgänger immer noch spürbar langsamer als bei Geräten der Oberklasse. Das Kaufargument für viele dürfte jedoch das wasserdichte Gehäuse sein. Klar ist: Samsung will mit dem Galaxy A52 die vor allem im Preis-Leistungs-Vergleich bislang oft attraktivere Chinakonkurrenz kleinhalten – gerade Xiaomi rückt den Koreanern zunehmend auf die Pelle. So gesehen könnte das Galaxy A52 sogar das wichtigste Samsung-Smartphone des Jahres 2021 werden, im Verkauf dürfte die günstigere LTE-Version dominieren.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52 hat Samsung ein Ass im Ärmel: Display, Design und Kamera decken alle normalen Alltagsansprüche gut ab. Das Display ist heller als das der Konkurrenz in der Preisklasse. Wer keine besonderen Anforderungen etwa bezüglich Zoom oder hohem Arbeitstempo stellt, wird damit zufrieden sein. Die Kamera ist mehr als nur schnappschusstauglich, macht sogar bei wenig Licht passable Fotos. Der Prozessor ist trotz Steigerung gegenüber dem Vorgänger immer noch spürbar langsamer als bei Geräten der Oberklasse. Das Kaufargument für viele dürfte jedoch das wasserdichte Gehäuse sein. Klar ist: Samsung will mit dem Galaxy A52 die vor allem im Preis-Leistungs-Vergleich bislang oft attraktivere Chinakonkurrenz kleinhalten – gerade Xiaomi rückt den Koreanern zunehmend auf die Pelle. So gesehen könnte das Galaxy A52 sogar das wichtigste Samsung-Smartphone des Jahres 2021 werden, im Verkauf dürfte die günstigere LTE-Version dominieren.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Computerbild
Tolles Display, passables Arbeitstempo, eine ordentliche Kamera und ein wasserdichtes Gehäuse: Für den Preis bietet schon die 128-Gigabyte-Version des Galaxy A52 ein starkes Paket. Überraschung im Test: Die LTE-Version ohne 5G ist trotz langsameren Prozessors besser als die 5G-Version – denn das normale A52 hält einfach viel länger durch.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Computerbild
Tolles Display, passables Arbeitstempo, eine ordentliche Kamera und ein wasserdichtes Gehäuse: Für den Preis bietet schon die 128-Gigabyte-Version des Galaxy A52 ein starkes Paket. Überraschung im Test: Die LTE-Version ohne 5G ist trotz langsameren Prozessors besser als die 5G-Version – denn das normale A52 hält einfach viel länger durch.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Computerbild
Tolles Display, passables Arbeitstempo, eine ordentliche Kamera und ein wasserdichtes Gehäuse: Für den Preis bietet schon die 128-Gigabyte-Version des Galaxy A52 ein starkes Paket. Überraschung im Test: Die LTE-Version ohne 5G ist trotz langsameren Prozessors besser als die 5G-Version – denn das normale A52 hält einfach viel länger durch.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Computerbild
Tolles Display, passables Arbeitstempo, eine ordentliche Kamera und ein wasserdichtes Gehäuse: Für den Preis bietet schon die 128-Gigabyte-Version des Galaxy A52 ein starkes Paket. Überraschung im Test: Die LTE-Version ohne 5G ist trotz langsameren Prozessors besser als die 5G-Version – denn das normale A52 hält einfach viel länger durch.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Mit dem Galaxy A52 5G präsentiert Samsung ein konkurrenzfähiges Mittelklasse-Handy zu einem fairen Preis, vor allem, wenn man den langen Support-Zeitraum für das Handy bedenkt. Zu den Stärken gehört zudem auch die Kamera. Abzüge gibt es unter anderem für das fehlende 25-Watt-Netzteil im Lieferumfang.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Ausstattung: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Mit dem Galaxy A52 5G präsentiert Samsung ein konkurrenzfähiges Mittelklasse-Handy zu einem fairen Preis, vor allem, wenn man den langen Support-Zeitraum für das Handy bedenkt. Zu den Stärken gehört zudem auch die Kamera. Abzüge gibt es unter anderem für das fehlende 25-Watt-Netzteil im Lieferumfang.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Ausstattung: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung Galaxy A52 erzielt in unserem Test ein solides Ergebnis. Insbesondere das AMOLED-Display liefert ein astreines Bild und ist dank der 90/120Hz Anzeige angenehm flüssig. Die Kamera erreicht ebenfalls gute Ergebnisse, insbesondere bei Nachtaufnahmen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung Galaxy A52 erzielt in unserem Test ein solides Ergebnis. Insbesondere das AMOLED-Display liefert ein astreines Bild und ist dank der 90/120Hz Anzeige angenehm flüssig. Die Kamera erreicht ebenfalls gute Ergebnisse, insbesondere bei Nachtaufnahmen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Curved
Um unsere Frage aus der Überschrift zu beantworten: Ja, das Samsung Galaxy A52 ist ein würdiger Nachfolger des A51. Die etwas billig wirkende Rückseite und die Anordnung der Kamera überzeugen eher nicht, dafür aber die Technik umso mehr. Für ab 349 Euro erhaltet ihr mit dem A52 ein solides Gerät, dass alle alltäglichen Smartphone-Aufgaben mit Bravour meistert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Preis: 80% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 81%
Quelle: Curved
Um unsere Frage aus der Überschrift zu beantworten: Ja, das Samsung Galaxy A52 ist ein würdiger Nachfolger des A51. Die etwas billig wirkende Rückseite und die Anordnung der Kamera überzeugen eher nicht, dafür aber die Technik umso mehr. Für ab 349 Euro erhaltet ihr mit dem A52 ein solides Gerät, dass alle alltäglichen Smartphone-Aufgaben mit Bravour meistert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Preis: 80% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 81%
Quelle: Computerbild
Tolles Display, passables Arbeitstempo, eine ordentliche Kamera und ein wasserdichtes Gehäuse: Für den Preis bietet schon die 128-Gigabyte-Version des Galaxy A52 ein starkes Paket. Überraschung im Test: Die LTE-Version ohne 5G ist trotz langsameren Prozessors besser als die 5G-Version – denn das normale A52 hält einfach viel länger durch.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Computerbild
Tolles Display, passables Arbeitstempo, eine ordentliche Kamera und ein wasserdichtes Gehäuse: Für den Preis bietet schon die 128-Gigabyte-Version des Galaxy A52 ein starkes Paket. Überraschung im Test: Die LTE-Version ohne 5G ist trotz langsameren Prozessors besser als die 5G-Version – denn das normale A52 hält einfach viel länger durch.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Computerbild
Tolles Display, passables Arbeitstempo, eine ordentliche Kamera und ein wasserdichtes Gehäuse: Für den Preis bietet schon die 128-Gigabyte-Version des Galaxy A52 ein starkes Paket. Überraschung im Test: Die LTE-Version ohne 5G ist trotz langsameren Prozessors besser als die 5G-Version – denn das normale A52 hält einfach viel länger durch.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Computerbild
Tolles Display, passables Arbeitstempo, eine ordentliche Kamera und ein wasserdichtes Gehäuse: Für den Preis bietet schon die 128-Gigabyte-Version des Galaxy A52 ein starkes Paket. Überraschung im Test: Die LTE-Version ohne 5G ist trotz langsameren Prozessors besser als die 5G-Version – denn das normale A52 hält einfach viel länger durch.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
For us, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is a good all-rounder smartphone. It has a decent quality on its camera and it just needs optimization. It also has average gaming performance even though the chipset isn’t capable of connecting to 5G. But the best offering is the display and the aesthetic and pleasing look which is great for entertainment use. 100 Days Review: We haven’t encountered any issues for around 3 months of use, and the device is stable and working fine as a daily driver. I won’t recommend the device if you are aiming for a mid-range gaming-focused smartphone, but if you are looking for a long-term device with the promise of android support for more than a couple of years, this will be a great option. Samsung Galaxy A52 is priced at P18,990 for the same 8GB + 128GB configuration. For the price, it really offers value with a couple of drawbacks but with strong upsides. The increments compared to its predecessor is very notable and worthy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.08.2021
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
For us, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is a good all-rounder smartphone. It has a decent quality on its camera and it just needs optimization. It also has average gaming performance even though the chipset isn’t capable of connecting to 5G. But the best offering is the display and the aesthetic and pleasing look which is great for entertainment use. 100 Days Review: We haven’t encountered any issues for around 3 months of use, and the device is stable and working fine as a daily driver. I won’t recommend the device if you are aiming for a mid-range gaming-focused smartphone, but if you are looking for a long-term device with the promise of android support for more than a couple of years, this will be a great option. Samsung Galaxy A52 is priced at P18,990 for the same 8GB + 128GB configuration. For the price, it really offers value with a couple of drawbacks but with strong upsides. The increments compared to its predecessor is very notable and worthy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.08.2021
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
The A52 is $100 more expensive than the A51 was at launch. For that hundred bucks, you're getting an overhauled design, a better processor, more RAM, faster display, and IP67 water resistance (the A51 didn't have any official rating). That's a lot of improvement. In the grand A-series tradition, the A52 is another competent mid-range Samsung phone in a long line of competent mid-range Samsung phones. But I would've liked to see some tweaks to either hit a lower price or allocate more budget to the A52's weaker points — dropping the two useless camera modules and swapping out the 120Hz panel for a 90Hz one, for instance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
The A52 is $100 more expensive than the A51 was at launch. For that hundred bucks, you're getting an overhauled design, a better processor, more RAM, faster display, and IP67 water resistance (the A51 didn't have any official rating). That's a lot of improvement. In the grand A-series tradition, the A52 is another competent mid-range Samsung phone in a long line of competent mid-range Samsung phones. But I would've liked to see some tweaks to either hit a lower price or allocate more budget to the A52's weaker points — dropping the two useless camera modules and swapping out the 120Hz panel for a 90Hz one, for instance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Manila Shaker
I have been using the Samsung Galaxy A52 for almost 4 months now, And in this video, I will share my experience, what I love and issues that I have encountered ever since I started using this device as my daily driver.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.07.2021
Quelle: Manila Shaker
I have been using the Samsung Galaxy A52 for almost 4 months now, And in this video, I will share my experience, what I love and issues that I have encountered ever since I started using this device as my daily driver.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.07.2021
Quelle: MrMobile
This is the Galaxy A52, Samsung’s top of the line mid-ranger, which on my book is maybe the best update the company has brought to the series. See, price and features are all nice things to have, but if you can add a bit of style to the package, I think the premise can go farther. I’m Jaime Rivera with Pocketnow and let’s dive into our full review
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.07.2021
Quelle: MrMobile
This is the Galaxy A52, Samsung’s top of the line mid-ranger, which on my book is maybe the best update the company has brought to the series. See, price and features are all nice things to have, but if you can add a bit of style to the package, I think the premise can go farther. I’m Jaime Rivera with Pocketnow and let’s dive into our full review
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.07.2021
Quelle: Gadgetspeak EN→DE
This is the latest Samsung offering to cross my desk, my unit has a matt sky blue back, a shiny slightly darker blue sides and a very shiny front. There are a vertical line of three cameras top left of the back and a forth camera and LED flash beside these.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 02.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 80% Leistung: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Gadgetspeak EN→DE
This is the latest Samsung offering to cross my desk, my unit has a matt sky blue back, a shiny slightly darker blue sides and a very shiny front. There are a vertical line of three cameras top left of the back and a forth camera and LED flash beside these.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 02.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 80% Leistung: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.06.2021
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.06.2021
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
The A52 is $100 more expensive than the A51 was at launch. For that hundred bucks, you're getting an overhauled design, a better processor, more RAM, faster display, and IP67 water resistance (the A51 didn't have any official rating). That's a lot of improvement. In the grand A-series tradition, the A52 is another competent mid-range Samsung phone in a long line of competent mid-range Samsung phones. But I would've liked to see some tweaks to either hit a lower price or allocate more budget to the A52's weaker points — dropping the two useless camera modules and swapping out the 120Hz panel for a 90Hz one, for instance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
The A52 is $100 more expensive than the A51 was at launch. For that hundred bucks, you're getting an overhauled design, a better processor, more RAM, faster display, and IP67 water resistance (the A51 didn't have any official rating). That's a lot of improvement. In the grand A-series tradition, the A52 is another competent mid-range Samsung phone in a long line of competent mid-range Samsung phones. But I would've liked to see some tweaks to either hit a lower price or allocate more budget to the A52's weaker points — dropping the two useless camera modules and swapping out the 120Hz panel for a 90Hz one, for instance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE
All of which makes it appear as if the Galaxy A52 will have a tough time repeating the bestselling achievements of its predecessor. It is a very good option for those who want a phone that looks different and performs well but starts fading the moment the spec sheet comparisons come into play. The Galaxy A52 ticks a lot of boxes but does not really top the class in any significant department.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.05.2021
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE
All of which makes it appear as if the Galaxy A52 will have a tough time repeating the bestselling achievements of its predecessor. It is a very good option for those who want a phone that looks different and performs well but starts fading the moment the spec sheet comparisons come into play. The Galaxy A52 ticks a lot of boxes but does not really top the class in any significant department.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.05.2021
Quelle: Phandroid EN→DE
At the end of the day, I’m pretty impressed by what the Galaxy A52 has to offer. Sure there are quite a few smartphones from Chinese brands that deliver better specs at the same price, but if you’re in the US, the only real option that might be better at $500 is the Pixel 4a 5G. There’s a noticeable gap in performance and camera quality between this phone and the Galaxy S21, but the $300 price difference definitely makes up for it, especially when you consider the improvements the A52 offers over last year’s model.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88%
Quelle: Phandroid EN→DE
At the end of the day, I’m pretty impressed by what the Galaxy A52 has to offer. Sure there are quite a few smartphones from Chinese brands that deliver better specs at the same price, but if you’re in the US, the only real option that might be better at $500 is the Pixel 4a 5G. There’s a noticeable gap in performance and camera quality between this phone and the Galaxy S21, but the $300 price difference definitely makes up for it, especially when you consider the improvements the A52 offers over last year’s model.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88%
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
And finally – the price. At RM1,499, I think that the Galaxy A52 is rather pricy, yes – so maybe wait until there’s a free gift bundle promotion. Truthfully speaking, both the Galaxy A52 and Galaxy A72 are pretty much the most balanced smartphones – in all aspects – at their own price range.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.04.2021
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
And finally – the price. At RM1,499, I think that the Galaxy A52 is rather pricy, yes – so maybe wait until there’s a free gift bundle promotion. Truthfully speaking, both the Galaxy A52 and Galaxy A72 are pretty much the most balanced smartphones – in all aspects – at their own price range.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.04.2021
Quelle: Think Digit EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a decent smartphone for its asking price but leaves a lot to be desired especially since you’re spending upwards of Rs 25,000. It does give users a viable alternative in the face of OnePlus Nord and the likes but does little to stand out in the crowd. It looks good in the hand and the matte finish on the back steers it clear of fingerprints and smudges. However, the biggest gripe is the fact that while the A52 supports 25W fast charging, Samsung wants users to pay for an additional adapter.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65% Preis: 66% Leistung: 58% Gehäuse: 65%
Quelle: Think Digit EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a decent smartphone for its asking price but leaves a lot to be desired especially since you’re spending upwards of Rs 25,000. It does give users a viable alternative in the face of OnePlus Nord and the likes but does little to stand out in the crowd. It looks good in the hand and the matte finish on the back steers it clear of fingerprints and smudges. However, the biggest gripe is the fact that while the A52 supports 25W fast charging, Samsung wants users to pay for an additional adapter.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65% Preis: 66% Leistung: 58% Gehäuse: 65%
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 is an interesting device given that it has two versions in the Philippine market. The one that we have is the 4G version that is priced at PHP 18,990, while the other is the 5G version with a more powerful chipset, higher refresh rate, and 5G connectivity for a more expensive PHP 23,990. Is it a good upgrade to the Galaxy A51? Yes, it is. Should you get one? If you’re okay not having the bells and whistles of the Galaxy A52 5G, and have a lower budget, then we think it’s a good buy. But if you really need 5G and a better performing chipset at this budget, we think you’re better off looking for a better option.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.04.2021
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 is an interesting device given that it has two versions in the Philippine market. The one that we have is the 4G version that is priced at PHP 18,990, while the other is the 5G version with a more powerful chipset, higher refresh rate, and 5G connectivity for a more expensive PHP 23,990. Is it a good upgrade to the Galaxy A51? Yes, it is. Should you get one? If you’re okay not having the bells and whistles of the Galaxy A52 5G, and have a lower budget, then we think it’s a good buy. But if you really need 5G and a better performing chipset at this budget, we think you’re better off looking for a better option.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.04.2021
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
With the Galaxy A52, Samsung is not trying to do something entirely different apart from revisiting the spec-sheets that have worked for the company. This is a reliable daily driver and the promise of software update for three years makes the deal sweeter. Having said that the price is a bit high when compared to other brands offering similar features in phones under Rs 20,000. But then as said above, this is where Samsung’s brand value and build quality comes in.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
With the Galaxy A52, Samsung is not trying to do something entirely different apart from revisiting the spec-sheets that have worked for the company. This is a reliable daily driver and the promise of software update for three years makes the deal sweeter. Having said that the price is a bit high when compared to other brands offering similar features in phones under Rs 20,000. But then as said above, this is where Samsung’s brand value and build quality comes in.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
In sum, the Galaxy A52 is a good device overall, but one that could have been better. That statement can actually be applied to anything and everything, but Samsung could have done well to include a faster processor, and some basic essentials like a 25W charger (since the phone supports it), and a case in the box. The 5G version of the Galaxy A52, which hasn’t been launched in India yet, does come with a 5G-capable Snapdragon 750G SoC and a 120Hz display, which are specs that sound much better on paper as compared to what the 4G version of the Galaxy A52 offers. When it comes to rivals, the Galaxy A52 goes up against the likes of the OnePlus Nord (review), the Xiaomi Mi 10T, the Mi 10i (review), and others in its price segment. Each of these devices has its own set of pluses and minuses, and in most cases, offers better performance than the Samsung Galaxy A52. On the other hand, the Galaxy A52 does feature IP67 waterproofing, which could appeal to a fair chunk of prospective buyers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
In sum, the Galaxy A52 is a good device overall, but one that could have been better. That statement can actually be applied to anything and everything, but Samsung could have done well to include a faster processor, and some basic essentials like a 25W charger (since the phone supports it), and a case in the box. The 5G version of the Galaxy A52, which hasn’t been launched in India yet, does come with a 5G-capable Snapdragon 750G SoC and a 120Hz display, which are specs that sound much better on paper as compared to what the 4G version of the Galaxy A52 offers. When it comes to rivals, the Galaxy A52 goes up against the likes of the OnePlus Nord (review), the Xiaomi Mi 10T, the Mi 10i (review), and others in its price segment. Each of these devices has its own set of pluses and minuses, and in most cases, offers better performance than the Samsung Galaxy A52. On the other hand, the Galaxy A52 does feature IP67 waterproofing, which could appeal to a fair chunk of prospective buyers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE
Priced Rs 26,499 onwards, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is an all-round midrange smartphone with something in store for everyone. It boasts a good sAMOLED display of 90Hz refresh rate, loud and clear stereo speakers, 3.5mm audio out port for wired earphones, a capable camera system, and sleek performance. Except for the IP67 protection and camera system with OIS, there is nothing new that the Galaxy A52 brings to the table when compared with other smartphones in the midrange segment. Therefore, it might not be the best midrange smartphone but the best in Samsung's line-up.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.04.2021
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE
Priced Rs 26,499 onwards, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is an all-round midrange smartphone with something in store for everyone. It boasts a good sAMOLED display of 90Hz refresh rate, loud and clear stereo speakers, 3.5mm audio out port for wired earphones, a capable camera system, and sleek performance. Except for the IP67 protection and camera system with OIS, there is nothing new that the Galaxy A52 brings to the table when compared with other smartphones in the midrange segment. Therefore, it might not be the best midrange smartphone but the best in Samsung's line-up.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.04.2021
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 has so many quality of life changes from its predecessor and checks many of the boxes that we’ve wanted to see from Samsung mid-rangers. You still have their beautiful display that has been improved with a higher refresh rate plus the addition of stereo speakers just ups the enjoyment with this device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2021
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 has so many quality of life changes from its predecessor and checks many of the boxes that we’ve wanted to see from Samsung mid-rangers. You still have their beautiful display that has been improved with a higher refresh rate plus the addition of stereo speakers just ups the enjoyment with this device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2021
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 is a good-looking smartphone and brings IP67 water and dust resistance rating to the table, which most of its competition miss out on. Sadly, apart from this, not a lot of things are in its favour. It does certain things well but the competition does them better. The Galaxy A52 does not offer the best performance and doesn't have the best cameras. However, it will appeal to the design-conscious, and if you are a bit clumsy, the water resistance is a big plus.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE
In our opinion, the Galaxy A52 is a much better pick than the Galaxy A72 as both of them have almost everything in common except a camera sensor, and display & battery size. The Galaxy A72 is also a decent phone but at that price, you have better options and even the differences between the two are not worth spending Rs 8500 more on the Galaxy A72.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 is a good-looking smartphone and brings IP67 water and dust resistance rating to the table, which most of its competition miss out on. Sadly, apart from this, not a lot of things are in its favour. It does certain things well but the competition does them better. The Galaxy A52 does not offer the best performance and doesn't have the best cameras. However, it will appeal to the design-conscious, and if you are a bit clumsy, the water resistance is a big plus.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE
In our opinion, the Galaxy A52 is a much better pick than the Galaxy A72 as both of them have almost everything in common except a camera sensor, and display & battery size. The Galaxy A72 is also a decent phone but at that price, you have better options and even the differences between the two are not worth spending Rs 8500 more on the Galaxy A72.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Quelle: The Times of India EN→DE
Overall, the Galaxy A52 is a decent mid-range phone except for its occasional stutters. The phone also has a lot to offer in terms of display, cameras and battery life. Galaxy A52 will most likely be a no brainer for Samsung fans seeing how the Galaxy A51 was a best-seller. But those looking for better value-for-money options can definitely consider checking out Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, and Realme X7 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.04.2021
Quelle: The Times of India EN→DE
Overall, the Galaxy A52 is a decent mid-range phone except for its occasional stutters. The phone also has a lot to offer in terms of display, cameras and battery life. Galaxy A52 will most likely be a no brainer for Samsung fans seeing how the Galaxy A51 was a best-seller. But those looking for better value-for-money options can definitely consider checking out Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, and Realme X7 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.04.2021
Quelle: Pokde EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is quite an interesting smartphone. For RM1,499, you get 4 years of guaranteed software support, an experience that is typically reserved for their more premium smartphones. You get decent build quality, punchy colours on the display, 90Hz refresh rate, a good camera system, IP67, stereo speakers, headphone jack is included, and a pretty solid battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 90% Leistung: 75% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Pokde EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is quite an interesting smartphone. For RM1,499, you get 4 years of guaranteed software support, an experience that is typically reserved for their more premium smartphones. You get decent build quality, punchy colours on the display, 90Hz refresh rate, a good camera system, IP67, stereo speakers, headphone jack is included, and a pretty solid battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 90% Leistung: 75% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
There's honestly very little to actually criticize about the Galaxy A52. Sure, the Snapdragon 720G is not the quickest chip around, but it doesn't seem to be holding back the experience in any practical way. Samsung's "Awesome is for everyone" slogan actually rings very true here. We, for one, are on board and give the A52 a hearty recommendation.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
There's honestly very little to actually criticize about the Galaxy A52. Sure, the Snapdragon 720G is not the quickest chip around, but it doesn't seem to be holding back the experience in any practical way. Samsung's "Awesome is for everyone" slogan actually rings very true here. We, for one, are on board and give the A52 a hearty recommendation.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: XDA Developers EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 brings many improvements over the older generations. While the hardware gets a major upgrade, the smartphone’s software experience is likely to drive many users looking for a long-lasting phone that can replace their old iPhone SE’s and XR’s. The improved experience includes a superior display, better cameras, and fast charging. Meanwhile, the Snapdragon 720G chipset brings improved performance, better thermal stability, and support for the Google Camera mod compared to counterparts in the Exynos family.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.03.2021
Quelle: XDA Developers EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52 brings many improvements over the older generations. While the hardware gets a major upgrade, the smartphone’s software experience is likely to drive many users looking for a long-lasting phone that can replace their old iPhone SE’s and XR’s. The improved experience includes a superior display, better cameras, and fast charging. Meanwhile, the Snapdragon 720G chipset brings improved performance, better thermal stability, and support for the Google Camera mod compared to counterparts in the Exynos family.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.03.2021
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
You are probably eyeing a flagship smartphone for months but have no budget to spend Rs 80,000 on a phone, especially during the pandemic. But the fact is there is no need to spend a ridiculous amount on a smartphone when you get a much capable phone for way less. Samsung’s new Galaxy A52, even though a premium mid-range phone, offers pretty much every feature you would wish to get in a high-end phone including a high refresh rate display, IP67 dust and water resistance, and even stereo speakers. With the Galaxy A52 starting at Rs 26,499, this smartphone sets a benchmark for premium mid-range devices.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 is the best mid-range phone from Samsung yet. Actually, it feels a lot like a high-end phone, and in some markets, that’s the reason why it’s priced a little above the Galaxy A51. It’s a good thing then that you’re getting an excellent phone. The only disadvantage I see is that you are still getting a macro camera instead of a zoom camera, and perhaps the stereo speakers could have been louder. Other than that, the Galaxy A52 does everything right, and you can order one with your eyes closed if you’re in the market for a sub-$400 phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.03.2021
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 is the best mid-range phone from Samsung yet. Actually, it feels a lot like a high-end phone, and in some markets, that’s the reason why it’s priced a little above the Galaxy A51. It’s a good thing then that you’re getting an excellent phone. The only disadvantage I see is that you are still getting a macro camera instead of a zoom camera, and perhaps the stereo speakers could have been louder. Other than that, the Galaxy A52 does everything right, and you can order one with your eyes closed if you’re in the market for a sub-$400 phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.03.2021
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
You are probably eyeing a flagship smartphone for months but have no budget to spend Rs 80,000 on a phone, especially during the pandemic. But the fact is there is no need to spend a ridiculous amount on a smartphone when you get a much capable phone for way less. Samsung’s new Galaxy A52, even though a premium mid-range phone, offers pretty much every feature you would wish to get in a high-end phone including a high refresh rate display, IP67 dust and water resistance, and even stereo speakers. With the Galaxy A52 starting at Rs 26,499, this smartphone sets a benchmark for premium mid-range devices.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 brings exciting upgrades in all key areas. You get a gorgeous design with pastel hues, lag-free performance, responsive 90Hz display, IP67 water resistance, outstanding battery life, cameras that take great photos, and three guaranteed Android updates.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 brings exciting upgrades in all key areas. You get a gorgeous design with pastel hues, lag-free performance, responsive 90Hz display, IP67 water resistance, outstanding battery life, cameras that take great photos, and three guaranteed Android updates.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
On paper, the Galaxy A52 is a fantastic phone, with a plethora of high-end features one could only dream of seeing on Samsung’s mid-range devices until last year. Just how well those specs come together in practice is something we will tell you in our full review in the next couple of days, but we think we can say with absolute certainty that Samsung has another winner of a mid-range phone in its hands, one that could outsell both the Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A51 combined.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.03.2021
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
On paper, the Galaxy A52 is a fantastic phone, with a plethora of high-end features one could only dream of seeing on Samsung’s mid-range devices until last year. Just how well those specs come together in practice is something we will tell you in our full review in the next couple of days, but we think we can say with absolute certainty that Samsung has another winner of a mid-range phone in its hands, one that could outsell both the Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A51 combined.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.03.2021
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 is a good-looking smartphone and is sure to grab eyeballs. The cameras also seem to be in line with what one should expect at this price point, going by their specifications. However, I have some reservations about the choice of processor here. Can the Galaxy A52 change my mind? Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 to find out in the full review, coming up soon.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.03.2021
Quelle: Engadget
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.03.2021
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 is a good-looking smartphone and is sure to grab eyeballs. The cameras also seem to be in line with what one should expect at this price point, going by their specifications. However, I have some reservations about the choice of processor here. Can the Galaxy A52 change my mind? Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 to find out in the full review, coming up soon.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.03.2021
Quelle: Engadget
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.03.2021
Quelle: Yugatech
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Yugatech
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Ausstattung: 90% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Ausstattung: 90% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Showmetech.com.br PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Preis: 75% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Showmetech.com.br PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Preis: 75% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Gizmodo Brasil PT→DE
Positive: Good price; nice display; decent processor; large battery capacity; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.08.2021
Quelle: Gizmodo Brasil PT→DE
Positive: Good price; nice display; decent processor; large battery capacity; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.08.2021
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; elegant design; great speakers; long battery life. Negative: Poor selfie camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.05.2021
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; elegant design; great speakers; long battery life. Negative: Poor selfie camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.05.2021
Quelle: Mais Tecnologia PT→DE
Positive: Good price; excellent cameras; nice display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.04.2021
Quelle: Mais Tecnologia PT→DE
Positive: Good price; excellent cameras; nice display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.04.2021
Quelle: DDay IT IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: DDay IT IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 77%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 77%
Quelle: Chimera Revo IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Chimera Revo IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 75% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 75% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: Batista70Phone IT→DE
Positive: Attractive price; nice quad cameras; excellent display; powerful processor; decent autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.05.2021
Quelle: Batista70Phone IT→DE
Positive: Attractive price; nice quad cameras; excellent display; powerful processor; decent autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.05.2021
Quelle: Computer Totaal NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 02.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Computer Totaal NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 02.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Want.nl NL→DE
Positive: Decent hardware; good price; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.04.2021
Quelle: Want.nl NL→DE
Positive: Decent hardware; good price; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.04.2021
Quelle: Fredzone FR→DE
Positive: Nice display; decent processor; great cameras; good price. Negative: Unsupported 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2021
Quelle: Fredzone FR→DE
Positive: Nice display; decent processor; great cameras; good price. Negative: Unsupported 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2021
Quelle: Antyweb PL→DE
Positive: Great display; waterproof IP67; beautiful design. Negative: Slow charging; plastic case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.04.2021
Quelle: Antyweb PL→DE
Positive: Great display; waterproof IP67; beautiful design. Negative: Slow charging; plastic case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.04.2021
Quelle: Log.com.tr TR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: Log.com.tr TR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Nice display; excellent cameras; support waterproof; quick charging; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.06.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Nice display; excellent cameras; support waterproof; quick charging; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.06.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent quad cameras; excellent display; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.06.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent quad cameras; excellent display; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.06.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.05.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.05.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Excellent display; powerful hardware; high gaming performance; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.05.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Excellent display; powerful hardware; high gaming performance; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.05.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.04.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.04.2021
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Nice quad cameras; compact size; light weight; powerful hardware; high performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.04.2021
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Nice quad cameras; compact size; light weight; powerful hardware; high performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.04.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; decent processor; high performance; excellent quad cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; decent processor; high performance; excellent quad cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; nice cameras; powerful hardware; high performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.03.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; nice cameras; powerful hardware; high performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.03.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Good price; waterproof and dust avoiding; nice display; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.03.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Good price; waterproof and dust avoiding; nice display; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.03.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; excellent cameras; long battery life; stylish design; good price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.03.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; excellent cameras; long battery life; stylish design; good price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.03.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; great built quality; decent cameras; nice display.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.03.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; great built quality; decent cameras; nice display.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.03.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; nice quad cameras; powerful processor; great display; large battery capacity; quick charging; impressive waterproof.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; solid workmanship; excellent quad cameras; powerful hardware; high gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.03.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; nice quad cameras; powerful processor; great display; large battery capacity; quick charging; impressive waterproof.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; solid workmanship; excellent quad cameras; powerful hardware; high gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.03.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Nice display; quick charging; waterproof.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Nice display; quick charging; waterproof.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2021
Quelle: Jagat Review ID→DE
Positive: Nice gaming performance; decent hardware; great display; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Bewertung: Ausstattung: 79%
Quelle: Jagat Review ID→DE
Positive: Nice gaming performance; decent hardware; great display; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.04.2021
Bewertung: Ausstattung: 79%
Quelle: Mobility.bg BU→DE
Positive: Attractive price; decent hardware; elegant design; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 26.03.2021
Quelle: Mobility.bg BU→DE
Positive: Attractive price; decent hardware; elegant design; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 26.03.2021
Quelle: Alt om Data DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 83% Leistung: 67%
Quelle: Alt om Data DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 83% Leistung: 67%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A22 4GProzessor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio G80
Grafikkarte: ARM Mali-G52 MP2
Bildschirm: 6.40 Zoll, 20:9, 1600 x 720 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.186kg
Preis: 229 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Wenn Sie sich das manchmal denken und ein Mittelklasse-Smartphone ohne den neuesten Mobilfunkstandard suchen, macht Ihnen Samsung ein Angebot: Das Galaxy A22 4G ist handlicher als sein 5G-Pendant, aber auch langsamer bei ähnlichem Preis. Ist das 4G-Smartphone also nur etwas für 5G-Muffel?
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A22 gehört zu den günstigsten Galaxy-Smartphones. Trotzdem findet man hier einen kontraststarken OLED-Bildschirm und eine Triple-Kamera. Doch es droht Verwechslungsgefahr. Alle Details im Test. Das Galaxy A22 in der LTE-Version (ohne 5G) ist sehr günstig und beeindruckt dennoch mit einem kontraststarken und halbwegs hellem 6,4-Zoll-Bildschirm. Doch es ist sehr langsam, die Display-Auflösung ist gering. Die Kamera macht tagsüber erstaunlich gute Fotos, solange man nicht allzu stark zoomt. Die Akku-Laufzeit ist überragend.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.02.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A22 gehört zu den günstigsten Galaxy-Smartphones. Trotzdem findet man hier einen kontraststarken OLED-Bildschirm und eine Triple-Kamera. Doch es droht Verwechslungsgefahr. Alle Details im Test. Das Galaxy A22 in der LTE-Version (ohne 5G) ist sehr günstig und beeindruckt dennoch mit einem kontraststarken und halbwegs hellem 6,4-Zoll-Bildschirm. Doch es ist sehr langsam, die Display-Auflösung ist gering. Die Kamera macht tagsüber erstaunlich gute Fotos, solange man nicht allzu stark zoomt. Die Akku-Laufzeit ist überragend.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.02.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.05.2022
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.05.2022
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
Samsung has really been putting in the work when it comes to the current Galaxy A lineup. Pretty much every model from the family recently has been solid and generally competitive in one way or another. The same is mostly true for the Galaxy A22 as well. The LTE Galaxy A22 is a well-put-together device, with a solid-performing AMOLED panel, complete with 90Hz refresh rate and straight-forward refresh rate handling (even if lower-res). The Galaxy A22 also manages great battery endurance from its 5,000 mAh battery, has a surprisingly feature-rich One UI 3.1 Core skin running on top of Android 11 and uses the decent, if unimpressive MediaTek Helio G80 chipset to its full potential. It has its fair share of issues and deficiencies as well, though. The plastic body feels a bit hollow at the back, it lacks any formal ingress protection or a "brand name" designation for its protective display glass. There are also no light or proximity sensors onboard the A22; charging is pretty slow, and the single bottom-firing loudspeaker is unimpressive.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 64%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
Samsung has really been putting in the work when it comes to the current Galaxy A lineup. Pretty much every model from the family recently has been solid and generally competitive in one way or another. The same is mostly true for the Galaxy A22 as well. The LTE Galaxy A22 is a well-put-together device, with a solid-performing AMOLED panel, complete with 90Hz refresh rate and straight-forward refresh rate handling (even if lower-res). The Galaxy A22 also manages great battery endurance from its 5,000 mAh battery, has a surprisingly feature-rich One UI 3.1 Core skin running on top of Android 11 and uses the decent, if unimpressive MediaTek Helio G80 chipset to its full potential. It has its fair share of issues and deficiencies as well, though. The plastic body feels a bit hollow at the back, it lacks any formal ingress protection or a "brand name" designation for its protective display glass. There are also no light or proximity sensors onboard the A22; charging is pretty slow, and the single bottom-firing loudspeaker is unimpressive.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 64%
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
So, let’s wrap up this review of the Samsung Galaxy A22. Should you buy it? I think the answer is region-specific. That’s because the A22 costs the same as the M32 here in Nepal, so in this case, my recommendation would be to go with the A22 because it’s better-optimized, has a better camera, and more importantly, it feels like you are holding a premium phone. However, if you are living in India, the A22 at INR 18,500 is a bit on the expensive side which makes it an easy no for me. Plus, Samsung has also launched the costlier 5G variant of A22, which is even more ridiculously priced. And like I said in my Poco M3 Pro review, the sad truth with almost every mid-range 5G phone right now is that they are priced quite absurdly and you might want to skip them until and unless you absolutely want 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.08.2021
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
So, let’s wrap up this review of the Samsung Galaxy A22. Should you buy it? I think the answer is region-specific. That’s because the A22 costs the same as the M32 here in Nepal, so in this case, my recommendation would be to go with the A22 because it’s better-optimized, has a better camera, and more importantly, it feels like you are holding a premium phone. However, if you are living in India, the A22 at INR 18,500 is a bit on the expensive side which makes it an easy no for me. Plus, Samsung has also launched the costlier 5G variant of A22, which is even more ridiculously priced. And like I said in my Poco M3 Pro review, the sad truth with almost every mid-range 5G phone right now is that they are priced quite absurdly and you might want to skip them until and unless you absolutely want 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.08.2021
Quelle: Cashify EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy A22 is a cheaper alternative to Galaxy M32. Although OIS on the primary camera steals the show, the camera setup is largely capped with the potential of the underwhelming processor aka G80 SoC. A slightly powerful processor and an FHD+ display could have made a lot of difference. For Rs 18,499/-, the device feels a bit pricey since you can get a powerful processor and FHD+ displays on many of its rivals at this price tag.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.07.2021
Quelle: Cashify EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy A22 is a cheaper alternative to Galaxy M32. Although OIS on the primary camera steals the show, the camera setup is largely capped with the potential of the underwhelming processor aka G80 SoC. A slightly powerful processor and an FHD+ display could have made a lot of difference. For Rs 18,499/-, the device feels a bit pricey since you can get a powerful processor and FHD+ displays on many of its rivals at this price tag.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.07.2021
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
It is difficult to recommend that the overall features of both the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and A22 4g smartphones devices overlap. But if you are looking for better camera technology, you might prefer the A22 4G. But on the other hand, if you are considering a phone for the long term, then the Galaxy A22 5G could be a great option in that case. However, you will get standard camera results. It’s not like there are flaws in both models, but minimal ones for the superb privileges. On that note, there is always room for an alternative. If you’re looking for the most valuable phone, check out the Realme X7 smartphone a worthwhile decision.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.07.2021
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
It is difficult to recommend that the overall features of both the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and A22 4g smartphones devices overlap. But if you are looking for better camera technology, you might prefer the A22 4G. But on the other hand, if you are considering a phone for the long term, then the Galaxy A22 5G could be a great option in that case. However, you will get standard camera results. It’s not like there are flaws in both models, but minimal ones for the superb privileges. On that note, there is always room for an alternative. If you’re looking for the most valuable phone, check out the Realme X7 smartphone a worthwhile decision.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.07.2021
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Great cameras; long battery life; nice AMOLED display; support both dual SIM and MicroSD card slot. Negative: Poor display; weak processor; unsupported 5G; mono speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 13.04.2022
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Great cameras; long battery life; nice AMOLED display; support both dual SIM and MicroSD card slot. Negative: Poor display; weak processor; unsupported 5G; mono speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 13.04.2022
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Excellent display; nice main camera. Negative: Poor selfie camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.08.2021
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Excellent display; nice main camera. Negative: Poor selfie camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.08.2021
Quelle: Charles Tech FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Charles Tech FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; bright AMOLED display; decent cameras; long battery life. Negative: Slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.02.2023
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; bright AMOLED display; decent cameras; long battery life. Negative: Slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.02.2023
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.06.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.06.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Decent processor; good performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 07.02.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Decent processor; good performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 07.02.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; great cameras; excellent AMOLED display; modern design; solid workmanship; decent performance; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.07.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; great cameras; excellent AMOLED display; modern design; solid workmanship; decent performance; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.07.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; large battery capacity; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.07.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; large battery capacity; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.07.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; large battery capacity; nice display; great cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.07.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; large battery capacity; nice display; great cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.07.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; compact size; light weight; excellent display; great cameras; impressive battery life. Negative: Easy getting dirts; average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.07.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; compact size; light weight; excellent display; great cameras; impressive battery life. Negative: Easy getting dirts; average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.07.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent quad cameras; great display; stylish design; long battery life; quick charging; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.07.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent quad cameras; great display; stylish design; long battery life; quick charging; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.07.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great quad cameras; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.06.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great quad cameras; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.06.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Impressive cameras; nice display; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 24.06.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Impressive cameras; nice display; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 24.06.2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A22 5GProzessor: Mediatek Dimensity 700
Grafikkarte: ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Bildschirm: 6.60 Zoll, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.203kg
Preis: 229 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Das Galaxy A22 gibt es mit 4G oder 5G. Das 5G-Modell bietet zwar kein OLED-Display, dafür aber schnelles Internet, ein flexibles Kamera-System und gute Leistungswerte. Im Test schauen wir uns das Mittelklasse-Handy von Samsung genauer an.
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A22 5G räuberte seinerzeit in der eigenen Familie. Es war günstiger, größer, schneller und hatte ein schärferes Display als das Galaxy A32 5G. Aber die Zeiten ändern sich. 2024 gibt es im ähnlichen Preisbereich wesentlich bessere Smartphones – auch von Samsung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.02.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A22 5G räuberte seinerzeit in der eigenen Familie. Es war günstiger, größer, schneller und hatte ein schärferes Display als das Galaxy A32 5G. Aber die Zeiten ändern sich. 2024 gibt es im ähnlichen Preisbereich wesentlich bessere Smartphones – auch von Samsung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.02.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A22 5G räubert in der eigenen Familie. Es ist günstiger, größer, schneller und hat ein schärferes Display als das Galaxy A32 5G. Im Vergleich zum Vorgänger Galaxy A21s bringt das A22 5G weniger Schwächen und dafür 5G mit. Achtung Verwechslungsgefahr: Gegenüber dem (etwas kleineren) Galaxy A22 ohne 5G fehlt das OLED-Display. Das LCD des A22 5G ist etwas kontrastarm und sehr dunkel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A22 5G räubert in der eigenen Familie. Es ist günstiger, größer, schneller und hat ein schärferes Display als das Galaxy A32 5G. Im Vergleich zum Vorgänger Galaxy A21s bringt das A22 5G weniger Schwächen und dafür 5G mit. Achtung Verwechslungsgefahr: Gegenüber dem (etwas kleineren) Galaxy A22 ohne 5G fehlt das OLED-Display. Das LCD des A22 5G ist etwas kontrastarm und sehr dunkel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A22 5G räubert in der eigenen Familie. Es ist günstiger, größer, schneller und hat ein schärferes Display als das Galaxy A32 5G. Im Vergleich zum Vorgänger Galaxy A21s bringt das A22 5G weniger Schwächen und dafür 5G mit. Achtung Verwechslungsgefahr: Gegenüber dem (etwas kleineren) Galaxy A22 ohne 5G fehlt das OLED-Display. Das LCD des A22 5G ist etwas kontrastarm und sehr dunkel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A22 5G räubert in der eigenen Familie. Es ist günstiger, größer, schneller und hat ein schärferes Display als das Galaxy A32 5G. Im Vergleich zum Vorgänger Galaxy A21s bringt das A22 5G weniger Schwächen und dafür 5G mit. Achtung Verwechslungsgefahr: Gegenüber dem (etwas kleineren) Galaxy A22 ohne 5G fehlt das OLED-Display. Das LCD des A22 5G ist etwas kontrastarm und sehr dunkel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Das Galaxy A22 5G ist ein ziemlich durchschnittliches Mittelklasse-Handy. Heißt, im Alltag gibt es weder große Überraschungen, noch enttäuscht das Smartphone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Das Galaxy A22 5G ist ein ziemlich durchschnittliches Mittelklasse-Handy. Heißt, im Alltag gibt es weder große Überraschungen, noch enttäuscht das Smartphone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A22 5G macht vor allem eines: das Galaxy A32 5G unnötig. Es ist günstiger, im Alltag sogar etwas schneller und hat das viel schärfere Display. Der Aufpreis zum kleineren A22 beträgt nur 20 Euro. Dafür muss man auf die Makrolinse verzichten, bekommt aber ein schnelleres Handy mit 5G und größerem und schärferem Bildschirm. Im Gegenzug bietet das kleine A22 mit OLED den besseren Kontrast. Im Vergleich zum A21s kann das A22 5G abgesehen von der maximalen Helligkeit und dem Preis alles besser. Trotzdem ist es zum Testzeitpunkt in der Smartphone-Bestenliste bis 300 Euro das bestplatzierte Galaxy und steigt in der Liste der besten 5G-Smartphones unter 300 Euro in die Top 10 ein. Kurz: ein Preistipp, wenn Samsung draufstehen soll.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A22 5G macht vor allem eines: das Galaxy A32 5G unnötig. Es ist günstiger, im Alltag sogar etwas schneller und hat das viel schärfere Display. Der Aufpreis zum kleineren A22 beträgt nur 20 Euro. Dafür muss man auf die Makrolinse verzichten, bekommt aber ein schnelleres Handy mit 5G und größerem und schärferem Bildschirm. Im Gegenzug bietet das kleine A22 mit OLED den besseren Kontrast. Im Vergleich zum A21s kann das A22 5G abgesehen von der maximalen Helligkeit und dem Preis alles besser. Trotzdem ist es zum Testzeitpunkt in der Smartphone-Bestenliste bis 300 Euro das bestplatzierte Galaxy und steigt in der Liste der besten 5G-Smartphones unter 300 Euro in die Top 10 ein. Kurz: ein Preistipp, wenn Samsung draufstehen soll.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A22 5G macht vor allem eines: das Galaxy A32 5G unnötig. Es ist günstiger, dabei sogar etwas schneller und hat das merklich schärfere Display. Der Aufpreis vom kleineren A22 beträgt nur 20 Euro. Dafür muss man zwar auf die Makrolinse verzichten, bekommt aber ein schnelleres Handy mit 5G und größerem und schärferem Bildschirm. Dafür bietet das kleine A22 mit OLED den besseren Kontrast. Im Vergleich zum A21s kann das A22 5G eigentlich alles besser, ist dafür naturgemäß (noch) teurer.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.08.2021
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A22 5G macht vor allem eines: das Galaxy A32 5G unnötig. Es ist günstiger, dabei sogar etwas schneller und hat das merklich schärfere Display. Der Aufpreis vom kleineren A22 beträgt nur 20 Euro. Dafür muss man zwar auf die Makrolinse verzichten, bekommt aber ein schnelleres Handy mit 5G und größerem und schärferem Bildschirm. Dafür bietet das kleine A22 mit OLED den besseren Kontrast. Im Vergleich zum A21s kann das A22 5G eigentlich alles besser, ist dafür naturgemäß (noch) teurer.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.08.2021
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is another well balanced if deeply unexciting affordable phone from Samsung. It’s the kind of no frills, no nasty surprises experience you arguably want for around the £200 mark. Its stand out feature is a 48MP main camera that’s capable of taking genuinely decent shots in good lighting, as well as a battery that will see you through two days of light to moderate usage. Where it fails to impress is with its performance, which feels a little slow and creaky even for a budget phone. The display, meanwhile, lacks pop, and the phone as a whole feels a little big and heavy. The good news is that given its age, you’ll likely be able to find the Galaxy A22 5G for significantly less than RRP, and Samsung’s ongoing software support means that it remains a viable choice for the money.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is another well balanced if deeply unexciting affordable phone from Samsung. It’s the kind of no frills, no nasty surprises experience you arguably want for around the £200 mark. Its stand out feature is a 48MP main camera that’s capable of taking genuinely decent shots in good lighting, as well as a battery that will see you through two days of light to moderate usage. Where it fails to impress is with its performance, which feels a little slow and creaky even for a budget phone. The display, meanwhile, lacks pop, and the phone as a whole feels a little big and heavy. The good news is that given its age, you’ll likely be able to find the Galaxy A22 5G for significantly less than RRP, and Samsung’s ongoing software support means that it remains a viable choice for the money.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Ricks Tech
In this video im doing camera glass replacement on the back of a Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, the same steps are used for A22 4G also
Support, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.05.2022
Quelle: Ricks Tech
In this video im doing camera glass replacement on the back of a Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, the same steps are used for A22 4G also
Support, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.05.2022
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G doesn't quite deliver the kind of experience that most people would expect, considering its price and competition. A wide selection of 5G bands would be a good thing to brag about, provided one could actually take advantage of them in India, but I'm pretty sure that by the time we get to use 5G, we will have had multiple successors to this phone. Unfortunately, there's little else to get excited about with the Galaxy A22 5G. In fact, I feel you'd be better served by Samsung's own Galaxy M32 5G or even the Galaxy F62. There's no shortage of good phones from the competition either, and a quick look though our list of the best phones under Rs. 20,000 and Rs. 25,000 should offer plenty of options.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 60% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G doesn't quite deliver the kind of experience that most people would expect, considering its price and competition. A wide selection of 5G bands would be a good thing to brag about, provided one could actually take advantage of them in India, but I'm pretty sure that by the time we get to use 5G, we will have had multiple successors to this phone. Unfortunately, there's little else to get excited about with the Galaxy A22 5G. In fact, I feel you'd be better served by Samsung's own Galaxy M32 5G or even the Galaxy F62. There's no shortage of good phones from the competition either, and a quick look though our list of the best phones under Rs. 20,000 and Rs. 25,000 should offer plenty of options.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 60% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Think Digit EN→DE
As a phone for the average user, there's very little to fault the Galaxy A22 5G for. The phone offers solid build quality, a good design and also a nice display. It also does well in the battery department and offers cameras that promise good daytime performance as well as low-light photography with the help of the camera's Night Mode. To top it all, it's 5G ready and also packs plenty of power to handle apps of daily use -- I.e of course, if you're looking to not run too many graphics-intensive games on it. Despite there being a lot of options in the segment, the Galaxy A22 5G still manages to emerge as a good option in the sub-Rs 20,000 segments of the market. So, if you're looking for a new 5G phone in this price range, and especially one from Samsung's stables, then this is definitely the device for you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 64% Preis: 63% Leistung: 59% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Think Digit EN→DE
As a phone for the average user, there's very little to fault the Galaxy A22 5G for. The phone offers solid build quality, a good design and also a nice display. It also does well in the battery department and offers cameras that promise good daytime performance as well as low-light photography with the help of the camera's Night Mode. To top it all, it's 5G ready and also packs plenty of power to handle apps of daily use -- I.e of course, if you're looking to not run too many graphics-intensive games on it. Despite there being a lot of options in the segment, the Galaxy A22 5G still manages to emerge as a good option in the sub-Rs 20,000 segments of the market. So, if you're looking for a new 5G phone in this price range, and especially one from Samsung's stables, then this is definitely the device for you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 64% Preis: 63% Leistung: 59% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Think Digit EN→DE
As a phone for the average user, there's very little to fault the Galaxy A22 5G for. The phone offers solid build quality, a good design and also a nice display. It also does well in the battery department and offers cameras that promise good daytime performance as well as low-light photography with the help of the camera's Night Mode. To top it all, it's 5G ready and also packs plenty of power to handle apps of daily use -- I.e of course, if you're looking to not run too many graphics-intensive games on it. Despite there being a lot of options in the segment, the Galaxy A22 5G still manages to emerge as a good option in the sub-Rs 20,000 segments of the market. So, if you're looking for a new 5G phone in this price range, and especially one from Samsung's stables, then this is definitely the device for you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 64% Preis: 63% Leistung: 59% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Think Digit EN→DE
As a phone for the average user, there's very little to fault the Galaxy A22 5G for. The phone offers solid build quality, a good design and also a nice display. It also does well in the battery department and offers cameras that promise good daytime performance as well as low-light photography with the help of the camera's Night Mode. To top it all, it's 5G ready and also packs plenty of power to handle apps of daily use -- I.e of course, if you're looking to not run too many graphics-intensive games on it. Despite there being a lot of options in the segment, the Galaxy A22 5G still manages to emerge as a good option in the sub-Rs 20,000 segments of the market. So, if you're looking for a new 5G phone in this price range, and especially one from Samsung's stables, then this is definitely the device for you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 64% Preis: 63% Leistung: 59% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a smartphone aimed at budget-minded users and competes against other devices in the Advanced segment ($200 to 399). General specs include an octa-core processor, a 6.6-inch TFT display with FHD+ resolution, 64 GB of internal memory, and a large 5000 mAh battery. The rear camera comprises a primary module with a 48 MP sensor, a 5 MP ultra-wide, and a depth sensor. Let’s see how this combo does in the DXOMARK Camera tests.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.09.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a smartphone aimed at budget-minded users and competes against other devices in the Advanced segment ($200 to 399). General specs include an octa-core processor, a 6.6-inch TFT display with FHD+ resolution, 64 GB of internal memory, and a large 5000 mAh battery. The rear camera comprises a primary module with a 48 MP sensor, a 5 MP ultra-wide, and a depth sensor. Let’s see how this combo does in the DXOMARK Camera tests.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.09.2021
Quelle: Cashify EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G rips off almost the same specifications as its 4G counterpart but with some downgrades to accommodate for the “5G network”. The battery is well-specced although Samsung should’ve gone for faster charging speed. For an informed decision, Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a tonne of alternatives such as Samsung Galaxy A32 (FHD, Super AMOLED, 90Hz) while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, the Poco X3 Pro, or you can check out Realme 8 5G which scores better than A22 5G on various benchmarking tests even with the same processor. Other alternatives include Redmi Note 10T 5G, Redmi Note 10 5G, and Poco M3 Pro 5G just to mention.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.08.2021
Quelle: Cashify EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G rips off almost the same specifications as its 4G counterpart but with some downgrades to accommodate for the “5G network”. The battery is well-specced although Samsung should’ve gone for faster charging speed. For an informed decision, Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a tonne of alternatives such as Samsung Galaxy A32 (FHD, Super AMOLED, 90Hz) while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, the Poco X3 Pro, or you can check out Realme 8 5G which scores better than A22 5G on various benchmarking tests even with the same processor. Other alternatives include Redmi Note 10T 5G, Redmi Note 10 5G, and Poco M3 Pro 5G just to mention.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.08.2021
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
While a few features are missing, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is still a good option under Rs 20,000 price segment. If you are someone who wants to buy a Samsung phone for general usage, then you can buy this mid-range phone and be prepared for the dawn of 4G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
While a few features are missing, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is still a good option under Rs 20,000 price segment. If you are someone who wants to buy a Samsung phone for general usage, then you can buy this mid-range phone and be prepared for the dawn of 4G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
These days, I’m judging Samsung’s affordable and mid-range phones based on how quickly I want to move back to a flagship device after the review, and the A22 5G passes with flying colors. All I missed were the considerably better cameras you get on flagships – nothing else truly bothered me, which is the highest praise I can give this phone. The A22 5G has a smooth display, excellent performance and battery life, decent main camera, and a cute little design. On the flip side, the software is too basic, an AMOLED screen would have been much better, the bezels should have been smaller, and you’re still having to make do with Samsung’s old and slow 15W charging tech.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.08.2021
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
These days, I’m judging Samsung’s affordable and mid-range phones based on how quickly I want to move back to a flagship device after the review, and the A22 5G passes with flying colors. All I missed were the considerably better cameras you get on flagships – nothing else truly bothered me, which is the highest praise I can give this phone. The A22 5G has a smooth display, excellent performance and battery life, decent main camera, and a cute little design. On the flip side, the software is too basic, an AMOLED screen would have been much better, the bezels should have been smaller, and you’re still having to make do with Samsung’s old and slow 15W charging tech.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.08.2021
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a good looking phone with long battery life, support for a number of 5G bands and offers decent performance in terms of multi-tasking. However, at a starting price of Rs 19,999, the smartphone faces tough competition from many lower-priced phones from rival brands as well as Samsung’s own Galaxy M31s, Galaxy M51 and Galaxy F41.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a good looking phone with long battery life, support for a number of 5G bands and offers decent performance in terms of multi-tasking. However, at a starting price of Rs 19,999, the smartphone faces tough competition from many lower-priced phones from rival brands as well as Samsung’s own Galaxy M31s, Galaxy M51 and Galaxy F41.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE
Shots taken under artificial lighting were decent again. The colours looked vibrant, while details were minimal. And the software again struggled to give accurate edge detection. Coming to night mode shots, these pictures looked atrocious. There’s no amount of detailing you can expect, and there’s a smudged effect all over the pictures. Wide-angle in night conditions behaves like a VGA camera with no sort of colours or details. Night mode didn’t make things better either.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE
Shots taken under artificial lighting were decent again. The colours looked vibrant, while details were minimal. And the software again struggled to give accurate edge detection. Coming to night mode shots, these pictures looked atrocious. There’s no amount of detailing you can expect, and there’s a smudged effect all over the pictures. Wide-angle in night conditions behaves like a VGA camera with no sort of colours or details. Night mode didn’t make things better either.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
And that's kind of leads to the elephant in the room - should you even get a 5G phone for under €250? If you really need 5G in your next device and can't stretch your budget any further, then the Galaxy A22 5G is worth considering. If you can compromise and settle for a 4G model instead, there is much more overall value to be had from other devices in this price range.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 64%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
And that's kind of leads to the elephant in the room - should you even get a 5G phone for under €250? If you really need 5G in your next device and can't stretch your budget any further, then the Galaxy A22 5G is worth considering. If you can compromise and settle for a 4G model instead, there is much more overall value to be had from other devices in this price range.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 64%
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 50%
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 50%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Positive: Attractive price; good hardware; nice performance; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 16.11.2021
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Positive: Attractive price; good hardware; nice performance; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 16.11.2021
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 50%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 50%
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Good built quality; decent performance; support 5G; nice cameras; excellent battery life; attractive price. Negative: Poor display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.02.2023
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Good built quality; decent performance; support 5G; nice cameras; excellent battery life; attractive price. Negative: Poor display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.02.2023
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: High performance; powerful hardware; support 5G; nice display; attractive price; decent cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.08.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: High performance; powerful hardware; support 5G; nice display; attractive price; decent cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.08.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Fast 5G; nice cameras; long battery life; excellent display; modern design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.08.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Fast 5G; nice cameras; long battery life; excellent display; modern design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.08.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Impressive 5G; high gaming performance; nice display; nice cameras; quick charging; beautiful design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.07.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Impressive 5G; high gaming performance; nice display; nice cameras; quick charging; beautiful design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.07.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Support 5G; good price; big screen; nice display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 23.07.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Support 5G; good price; big screen; nice display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 23.07.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; big screen; nice display; good price; support 5G. Negative: Poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.07.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; big screen; nice display; good price; support 5G. Negative: Poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.07.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Support 5G; large battery capacity; nice cameras; beautiful display; decent processor; great connectivity.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.06.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Support 5G; large battery capacity; nice cameras; beautiful display; decent processor; great connectivity.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.06.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; nice display; support 5G; decent autonomy; quick charging. Negative: Mediocre design; plastic case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.06.2021
Quelle: TechTimes VN VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; nice performance; support 5G; decent cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.06.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; nice display; support 5G; decent autonomy; quick charging. Negative: Mediocre design; plastic case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.06.2021
Quelle: TechTimes VN VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; nice performance; support 5G; decent cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.06.2021
Quelle: Jagat Review ID→DE
Positive: Support 5G; excellent cameras; powerful hardware; high gaming performance. Negative: No NFC; mediocre speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.07.2021
Quelle: Jagat Review ID→DE
Positive: Support 5G; excellent cameras; powerful hardware; high gaming performance. Negative: No NFC; mediocre speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.07.2021
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127FProzessor: Samsung Exynos 850
Grafikkarte: ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Bildschirm: 6.50 Zoll, 20:9, 1600 x 720 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.205kg
Preis: 170 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Testberichte
Das Galaxy A12 Nacho präsentiert sich in unserem Test mit einer guten Ausstattung, aber ebenso mit einigen Schwächen. Wie auch beim Galaxy A12, fällt die Preisgestaltung des Samsung-Handys äußert attraktiv aus. Ob sich ein Kauf des Einsteiger-Smartphones lohnt, lesen Sie in diesem Testbericht.
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
Except for the Exynos 850 chipset, the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho is an overall good smartphone in the low-budget segment. Where Galaxy has a huge collection, Nacho is one more phone that adds to the Galaxy A12 series. Since the phone is not available globally, there is no way for you to access it. Either you have to wait or go to the alternative. According to company information, they may be available on their official website. This colorful smartphone is a good choice for everyone looking for a low-budget smartphone with lots of awesome specs. If you’re spending $149 (Rs 12,000), the Galaxy A12 Nacho is an amazing smartphone that’s worth your money. There is also the Realme C25Y at the same price, otherwise, you can check for the TCL 20R smartphone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.10.2021
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
Except for the Exynos 850 chipset, the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho is an overall good smartphone in the low-budget segment. Where Galaxy has a huge collection, Nacho is one more phone that adds to the Galaxy A12 series. Since the phone is not available globally, there is no way for you to access it. Either you have to wait or go to the alternative. According to company information, they may be available on their official website. This colorful smartphone is a good choice for everyone looking for a low-budget smartphone with lots of awesome specs. If you’re spending $149 (Rs 12,000), the Galaxy A12 Nacho is an amazing smartphone that’s worth your money. There is also the Realme C25Y at the same price, otherwise, you can check for the TCL 20R smartphone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.10.2021
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A13 5GProzessor: Mediatek Dimensity 700
Grafikkarte: ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Bildschirm: 6.50 Zoll, 20:9, 1600 x 720 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.195kg
Preis: 229 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Knapp über 200 Euro finden sich die aktuell günstigsten 5G-Phones, zu denen auch das Galaxy A13 5G zählt. Als Preis für das schnelle mobile Internet muss man mit einem einfachen Chassis und wenig Speicher leben. Ein guter Tausch?
Quelle: A1 Blog
Sich in der Welt der Einsteiger- bzw. Budget-Smartphones durchzusetzen, ist nicht so einfach. Um zu konkurrenzfähigen Preisen anbieten zu können, muss an vielen Ecken und Enden gespart werden.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.09.2022
Quelle: A1 Blog
Sich in der Welt der Einsteiger- bzw. Budget-Smartphones durchzusetzen, ist nicht so einfach. Um zu konkurrenzfähigen Preisen anbieten zu können, muss an vielen Ecken und Enden gespart werden.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.09.2022
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The previous Galaxy A12 has been kicking around for a while now, and it’s certainly a bit outdated by modern standards. It didn’t initially receive a recommendation in our review, but with 2022 updates to the cameras, design and software, the Galaxy A13 was perfectly positioned to finally make an appearance on our best budget smartphones list. Except Samsung really missed the mark with this one. Its decision to opt for one of the weakest mobile chipsets we’ve tested in quite some time is a baffling one, and the lack of 5G connectivity is a glaring omission as well. Neither the extra ultrawide camera nor the 1080p screen are enough of an incentive to mask the fact that we’re getting the short end of the stick.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The previous Galaxy A12 has been kicking around for a while now, and it’s certainly a bit outdated by modern standards. It didn’t initially receive a recommendation in our review, but with 2022 updates to the cameras, design and software, the Galaxy A13 was perfectly positioned to finally make an appearance on our best budget smartphones list. Except Samsung really missed the mark with this one. Its decision to opt for one of the weakest mobile chipsets we’ve tested in quite some time is a baffling one, and the lack of 5G connectivity is a glaring omission as well. Neither the extra ultrawide camera nor the 1080p screen are enough of an incentive to mask the fact that we’re getting the short end of the stick.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE
The Galaxy A13 5G is a fine budget device that makes sense for those who are more concerned with day-to-day performance and long battery life than a high-quality screen or a versatile camera. If you’re on a strict budget and you’re an AT&T customer, those are two more reasons to consider the A13. The carrier’s C-band 5G is limited to just a few markets now, but the phone will be supported with three years of security updates and two years of OS upgrades — long enough to see the network expand to more major cities. If any of the above criteria doesn’t apply to you, then there are better options available for the same cost — even less! The $239 OnePlus N200 5G is a great choice if you’re on T-Mobile — it offers comparable performance and a nicer screen for $10 less than the A13’s retail price. The N200 doesn’t work on AT&T or Verizon’s 5G networks, so it’s a 4G-only phone if you’re with one of those carriers — not a bad deal for the price, but you’ll miss out on the better 5G speeds coming over the next couple of years. As of this writing, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G has come down in price to $249 if you buy through AT&T (from $399), offering a better screen and equally healthy battery life. It’s not currently certified for AT&T C-band, but it’s a good buy if you’re outside of one of those eight launch cities anyway. If those alternatives don’t appeal, then the A13 5G will serve you fine — it’s a reliable device for well under $300 that’s fully prepared for the next generation of wireless technology, with no unpleasant (or pleasant) surprises included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE
If any of the above criteria doesn’t apply to you, then there are better options available for the same cost — even less! The $239 OnePlus N200 5G is a great choice if you’re on T-Mobile — it offers comparable performance and a nicer screen for $10 less than the A13’s retail price. The N200 doesn’t work on AT&T or Verizon’s 5G networks, so it’s a 4G-only phone if you’re with one of those carriers — not a bad deal for the price, but you’ll miss out on the better 5G speeds coming over the next couple of years. As of this writing, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G has come down in price to $249 if you buy through AT&T (from $399), offering a better screen and equally healthy battery life. It’s not currently certified for AT&T C-band, but it’s a good buy if you’re outside of one of those eight launch cities anyway. If those alternatives don’t appeal, then the A13 5G will serve you fine — it’s a reliable device for well under $300 that’s fully prepared for the next generation of wireless technology, with no unpleasant (or pleasant) surprises included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE
The Galaxy A13 5G is a fine budget device that makes sense for those who are more concerned with day-to-day performance and long battery life than a high-quality screen or a versatile camera. If you’re on a strict budget and you’re an AT&T customer, those are two more reasons to consider the A13. The carrier’s C-band 5G is limited to just a few markets now, but the phone will be supported with three years of security updates and two years of OS upgrades — long enough to see the network expand to more major cities. If any of the above criteria doesn’t apply to you, then there are better options available for the same cost — even less! The $239 OnePlus N200 5G is a great choice if you’re on T-Mobile — it offers comparable performance and a nicer screen for $10 less than the A13’s retail price. The N200 doesn’t work on AT&T or Verizon’s 5G networks, so it’s a 4G-only phone if you’re with one of those carriers — not a bad deal for the price, but you’ll miss out on the better 5G speeds coming over the next couple of years. As of this writing, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G has come down in price to $249 if you buy through AT&T (from $399), offering a better screen and equally healthy battery life. It’s not currently certified for AT&T C-band, but it’s a good buy if you’re outside of one of those eight launch cities anyway. If those alternatives don’t appeal, then the A13 5G will serve you fine — it’s a reliable device for well under $300 that’s fully prepared for the next generation of wireless technology, with no unpleasant (or pleasant) surprises included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE
If any of the above criteria doesn’t apply to you, then there are better options available for the same cost — even less! The $239 OnePlus N200 5G is a great choice if you’re on T-Mobile — it offers comparable performance and a nicer screen for $10 less than the A13’s retail price. The N200 doesn’t work on AT&T or Verizon’s 5G networks, so it’s a 4G-only phone if you’re with one of those carriers — not a bad deal for the price, but you’ll miss out on the better 5G speeds coming over the next couple of years. As of this writing, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G has come down in price to $249 if you buy through AT&T (from $399), offering a better screen and equally healthy battery life. It’s not currently certified for AT&T C-band, but it’s a good buy if you’re outside of one of those eight launch cities anyway. If those alternatives don’t appeal, then the A13 5G will serve you fine — it’s a reliable device for well under $300 that’s fully prepared for the next generation of wireless technology, with no unpleasant (or pleasant) surprises included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
Besides its very appealing price, the Samsung Galaxy A13 only manages to be 'good enough' in most of the areas that matter for a smartphone (from the camera to the battery life) – but for some users that's going to make it a tempting, value-for-money deal.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
Besides its very appealing price, the Samsung Galaxy A13 only manages to be 'good enough' in most of the areas that matter for a smartphone (from the camera to the battery life) – but for some users that's going to make it a tempting, value-for-money deal.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G showed excellent autonomy when tested in default settings, especially in the typical usage scenario, where the device was very stable and consumed little power, day and night. It lost only 1% per night on average. When tested outside, the autonomy was excellent across all use cases. In calibrated mode, the device showed decent performance overall, with excellent autonomy when streaming music. The downside of this device was its charging performance, because of the small 15W charger. It took 2 hours and 28 minutes to fully charge the large 5000 mAh battery, and charging the device for 5 minutes provided only 2 hours and 24 minutes of autonomy on average, which is very low when compared with the phones in our database. Even if the residual consumption of the charger was very low, its efficiency was poor and below the average of our database. Regarding the discharge efficiency, the Galaxy A13 5G’s discharge currents were very low during our TUS, as well as during our on-the-go tests, meaning that the device is well-optimized when used in default settings.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.10.2022
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G showed excellent autonomy when tested in default settings, especially in the typical usage scenario, where the device was very stable and consumed little power, day and night. It lost only 1% per night on average. When tested outside, the autonomy was excellent across all use cases. In calibrated mode, the device showed decent performance overall, with excellent autonomy when streaming music. The downside of this device was its charging performance, because of the small 15W charger. It took 2 hours and 28 minutes to fully charge the large 5000 mAh battery, and charging the device for 5 minutes provided only 2 hours and 24 minutes of autonomy on average, which is very low when compared with the phones in our database. Even if the residual consumption of the charger was very low, its efficiency was poor and below the average of our database. Regarding the discharge efficiency, the Galaxy A13 5G’s discharge currents were very low during our TUS, as well as during our on-the-go tests, meaning that the device is well-optimized when used in default settings.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.10.2022
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
Samsung’s Galaxy A13 5G offers the most complete package of any A10 series device to date, but it does so at a cost. The addition of 5G provides better longevity than previous models, it’s more powerful than ever, and the 50MP primary camera offers pleasing results in good lighting. However, the lack of improvements to the peripheral cameras and missing ultrawide shooter, the weak display, and the bland design raise some questions about the $70 price increase. I can’t help but feel that Samsung would’ve been better off skipping 5G and making improvements to the rest of the package instead to make it a better overall starter smartphone. For as difficult as the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G can be to justify unlocked, US carrier access tells a slightly different story. Right now, it’s available for free from T-Mobile or for $2 per month at AT&T over 36 months. Paying $72 is much easier to justify than $249 outright. Nevertheless, the increased price puts the Galaxy A13 5G in competition with a new class of budget devices.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.09.2022
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
Samsung’s Galaxy A13 5G offers the most complete package of any A10 series device to date, but it does so at a cost. The addition of 5G provides better longevity than previous models, it’s more powerful than ever, and the 50MP primary camera offers pleasing results in good lighting. However, the lack of improvements to the peripheral cameras and missing ultrawide shooter, the weak display, and the bland design raise some questions about the $70 price increase. I can’t help but feel that Samsung would’ve been better off skipping 5G and making improvements to the rest of the package instead to make it a better overall starter smartphone. For as difficult as the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G can be to justify unlocked, US carrier access tells a slightly different story. Right now, it’s available for free from T-Mobile or for $2 per month at AT&T over 36 months. Paying $72 is much easier to justify than $249 outright. Nevertheless, the increased price puts the Galaxy A13 5G in competition with a new class of budget devices.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.09.2022
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
Samsung’s Galaxy A13 5G offers the most complete package of any A10 series device to date, but it does so at a cost. The addition of 5G provides better longevity than previous models, it’s more powerful than ever, and the 50MP primary camera offers pleasing results in good lighting. However, the lack of improvements to the peripheral cameras and missing ultrawide shooter, the weak display, and the bland design raise some questions about the $70 price increase. I can’t help but feel that Samsung would’ve been better off skipping 5G and making improvements to the rest of the package instead to make it a better overall starter smartphone. For as difficult as the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G can be to justify unlocked, US carrier access tells a slightly different story. Right now, it’s available for free from T-Mobile or for $2 per month at AT&T over 36 months. Paying $72 is much easier to justify than $249 outright. Nevertheless, the increased price puts the Galaxy A13 5G in competition with a new class of budget devices.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.06.2022
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
Samsung’s Galaxy A13 5G offers the most complete package of any A10 series device to date, but it does so at a cost. The addition of 5G provides better longevity than previous models, it’s more powerful than ever, and the 50MP primary camera offers pleasing results in good lighting. However, the lack of improvements to the peripheral cameras and missing ultrawide shooter, the weak display, and the bland design raise some questions about the $70 price increase. I can’t help but feel that Samsung would’ve been better off skipping 5G and making improvements to the rest of the package instead to make it a better overall starter smartphone. For as difficult as the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G can be to justify unlocked, US carrier access tells a slightly different story. Right now, it’s available for free from T-Mobile or for $2 per month at AT&T over 36 months. Paying $72 is much easier to justify than $249 outright. Nevertheless, the increased price puts the Galaxy A13 5G in competition with a new class of budget devices.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.06.2022
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
Samsung’s Galaxy A13 offers the most complete package of any A10 series device to date, but it does so at a cost. The addition of 5G provides better longevity than previous models, it’s more powerful than ever, and the 50MP primary camera offers pleasing results in good lighting. However, the lack of improvements to the peripheral cameras and missing ultrawide shooter, the weak display, and the bland design raise some questions about the $70 price increase. I can’t help but feel that Samsung would’ve been better off skipping 5G and making improvements to the rest of the package instead to make it a better overall starter smartphone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.02.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
Samsung’s Galaxy A13 offers the most complete package of any A10 series device to date, but it does so at a cost. The addition of 5G provides better longevity than previous models, it’s more powerful than ever, and the 50MP primary camera offers pleasing results in good lighting. However, the lack of improvements to the peripheral cameras and missing ultrawide shooter, the weak display, and the bland design raise some questions about the $70 price increase. I can’t help but feel that Samsung would’ve been better off skipping 5G and making improvements to the rest of the package instead to make it a better overall starter smartphone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.02.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE
The Galaxy A13 5G doesn’t offer much in the way of surprises, good or bad. For $249, it’s a reliable device with good performance, healthy battery life, and a decent camera. None of this comes as a surprise because Samsung makes a lot of these kinds of phones, and it’s something the company is very good at. The phone launched in the US as an AT&T exclusive; now, you can buy it unlocked or through T-Mobile, too. But that initial carrier relationship plays into what might be the most compelling reason to look at the A13 5G right now: it’s certified to use AT&T’s newly enabled C-band spectrum. This is the variety of 5G that promises faster-than-4G speeds and good signal reach — a combination that some US 5G networks have been lacking until now. The list of C-band enabled devices at the network’s launch was short and dominated by pricey flagships, with the exception of the Galaxy A13 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.02.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE
The Galaxy A13 5G doesn’t offer much in the way of surprises, good or bad. For $249, it’s a reliable device with good performance, healthy battery life, and a decent camera. None of this comes as a surprise because Samsung makes a lot of these kinds of phones, and it’s something the company is very good at. The phone launched in the US as an AT&T exclusive; now, you can buy it unlocked or through T-Mobile, too. But that initial carrier relationship plays into what might be the most compelling reason to look at the A13 5G right now: it’s certified to use AT&T’s newly enabled C-band spectrum. This is the variety of 5G that promises faster-than-4G speeds and good signal reach — a combination that some US 5G networks have been lacking until now. The list of C-band enabled devices at the network’s launch was short and dominated by pricey flagships, with the exception of the Galaxy A13 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.02.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
Overall the Samsung Galaxy A13 is a decent smartphone that has a large display, huge battery support, gaming processor, and enhanced performance due to 7nm technology and users would enjoy a 5G support. Definitely, the camera department may disappoint some users, but overall, this is a good smartphone from a reliable brand at an affordable cost. But it has missed some industry-standard features, as there is no AMOLED display, no Gorilla Glass protection, no gyro-EIS sensor, and also don’t have any IP certification. If you are not ready to go with the Samsung Galaxy A13, and looking for an alternative option definitely take a look at the Motorola Moto G71 smartphone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.01.2022
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
Overall the Samsung Galaxy A13 is a decent smartphone that has a large display, huge battery support, gaming processor, and enhanced performance due to 7nm technology and users would enjoy a 5G support. Definitely, the camera department may disappoint some users, but overall, this is a good smartphone from a reliable brand at an affordable cost. But it has missed some industry-standard features, as there is no AMOLED display, no Gorilla Glass protection, no gyro-EIS sensor, and also don’t have any IP certification. If you are not ready to go with the Samsung Galaxy A13, and looking for an alternative option definitely take a look at the Motorola Moto G71 smartphone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.01.2022
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A13 was released in December 2021 and the price is around $249 (Rs 18,599 in India). Apart from this, the phone will offer a 6.5-inches PLS TFT display that will render decent 90Hz, 270 PPI density, HD resolution, the software layering presents an Andriod 11 sets based on One UI interface, 7nm – MediaTek MT6833 Dimensity 700 5G chipset under the hood, Mali-G57 MC2 GPU to support visuals, a triple camera setup offering a 50MP primary snapper, a 5MP selfie port with 1080p video recording, a massive 5000 mAh battery comes with a 15W fast-charging brick. For color, you get only one – Black. as well as the phone is configured with only a 4GB RAM variant along with 64 GB internal storage.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.12.2021
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A13 was released in December 2021 and the price is around $249 (Rs 18,599 in India). Apart from this, the phone will offer a 6.5-inches PLS TFT display that will render decent 90Hz, 270 PPI density, HD resolution, the software layering presents an Andriod 11 sets based on One UI interface, 7nm – MediaTek MT6833 Dimensity 700 5G chipset under the hood, Mali-G57 MC2 GPU to support visuals, a triple camera setup offering a 50MP primary snapper, a 5MP selfie port with 1080p video recording, a massive 5000 mAh battery comes with a 15W fast-charging brick. For color, you get only one – Black. as well as the phone is configured with only a 4GB RAM variant along with 64 GB internal storage.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.12.2021
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 60% Ergonomie: 60%
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 60% Ergonomie: 60%
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; support 5G; big screen; good price; nice performance; long battery life. Negative: Poor display; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.12.2022
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; support 5G; big screen; good price; nice performance; long battery life. Negative: Poor display; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.12.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; long battery life; modern design; decent hardware; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.01.2023
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; long battery life; modern design; decent hardware; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.01.2023
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; nice cameras; big screen; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.05.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; nice cameras; big screen; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.05.2022
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A13 4GProzessor: Samsung Exynos 850
Grafikkarte: ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Bildschirm: 6.60 Zoll, 20:9, 2408 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.195kg
Preis: 189 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Mit Full-HD-Screen und WiFi 5 geht das Samsung Galaxy A13 4G für unter 200 Euro an den Start. Hier hat es starke Mitbewerber. Reichen die Verbesserungen gegenüber dem Vorgänger also aus, um wirklich konkurrenzfähig zu sein.
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy ist sehr günstig – und das merkt man durchaus: Der Prozessor ist sehr langsam, das Aufladen dauert knapp drei Stunden und das Gehäuse besteht aus Plastik. Immerhin: Die Kamera macht zumindest bei Tageslicht überraschend passable Bilder. Das Full-HD-Display ist zwar kontrastschwach, aber recht scharf und bei der Farbwiedergabe nicht schlecht. Die Akkulaufzeit ist gut. Extras wie 5G, drahtloses Laden oder ein wasserdichtes Gehäuse fehlen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.09.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy ist sehr günstig – und das merkt man durchaus: Der Prozessor ist sehr langsam, das Aufladen dauert knapp drei Stunden und das Gehäuse besteht aus Plastik. Immerhin: Die Kamera macht zumindest bei Tageslicht überraschend passable Bilder. Das Full-HD-Display ist zwar kontrastschwach, aber recht scharf und bei der Farbwiedergabe nicht schlecht. Die Akkulaufzeit ist gut. Extras wie 5G, drahtloses Laden oder ein wasserdichtes Gehäuse fehlen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.09.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Basic Tutorials
Wer sich für den Kauf des Samsung Galaxy A13 entscheidet, darf selbstverständlich keine Wunder erwarten. Hierbei handelt es sich um ein Low-Budget-Smartphone, bei dem man Kompromisse machen muss.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Basic Tutorials
Wer sich für den Kauf des Samsung Galaxy A13 entscheidet, darf selbstverständlich keine Wunder erwarten. Hierbei handelt es sich um ein Low-Budget-Smartphone, bei dem man Kompromisse machen muss.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.08.2023
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.08.2023
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The previous Galaxy A12 has been kicking around for a while now, and it’s certainly a bit outdated by modern standards. It didn’t initially receive a recommendation in our review, but with 2022 updates to the cameras, design and software, the Galaxy A13 was perfectly positioned to finally make an appearance on our best budget smartphones list. Except Samsung really missed the mark with this one. Its decision to opt for one of the weakest mobile chipsets we’ve tested in quite some time is a baffling one, and the lack of 5G connectivity is a glaring omission as well. Neither the extra ultrawide camera nor the 1080p screen are enough of an incentive to mask the fact that we’re getting the short end of the stick. It might be dirt cheap, but don’t let Samsung fool you – you can do better for the price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The previous Galaxy A12 has been kicking around for a while now, and it’s certainly a bit outdated by modern standards. It didn’t initially receive a recommendation in our review, but with 2022 updates to the cameras, design and software, the Galaxy A13 was perfectly positioned to finally make an appearance on our best budget smartphones list. Except Samsung really missed the mark with this one. Its decision to opt for one of the weakest mobile chipsets we’ve tested in quite some time is a baffling one, and the lack of 5G connectivity is a glaring omission as well. Neither the extra ultrawide camera nor the 1080p screen are enough of an incentive to mask the fact that we’re getting the short end of the stick. It might be dirt cheap, but don’t let Samsung fool you – you can do better for the price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A13 has decent specs and provides a good user experience, especially for daily tasks such as messaging applications and internet browsing. It's a decent option at RM799 if you want to get this for old folks who aren't tech-savvy, as it's easy to use. Of course, some smartphones are cheaper or have better specs at the same price. For example, the OPPO A57 is more affordable at RM699, albeit with a less impressive camera setup (13MP + 2MP). There's also the Infinix Note 12 (RM749), a smartphone that performs as well as the Galaxy A13. It lacks the 8MP ultra-wide camera but features a 16MP selfie camera instead. Ultimately, it comes down to your preferences. For many, the Samsung Galaxy A13 works well enough, looks decent, and is a product from a reliable brand. That last reason alone is enough for some smartphone users.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.07.2022
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A13 has decent specs and provides a good user experience, especially for daily tasks such as messaging applications and internet browsing. It's a decent option at RM799 if you want to get this for old folks who aren't tech-savvy, as it's easy to use. Of course, some smartphones are cheaper or have better specs at the same price. For example, the OPPO A57 is more affordable at RM699, albeit with a less impressive camera setup (13MP + 2MP). There's also the Infinix Note 12 (RM749), a smartphone that performs as well as the Galaxy A13. It lacks the 8MP ultra-wide camera but features a 16MP selfie camera instead. Ultimately, it comes down to your preferences. For many, the Samsung Galaxy A13 works well enough, looks decent, and is a product from a reliable brand. That last reason alone is enough for some smartphone users.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.07.2022
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) was announced in June 2022 and caters to the upper mid-range segment. The phone holds a 6.6 inches PLS LCD display panel with a 400-pixel density. Besides this, the device runs on Android 12 OS supported by One UI 4.1 user interface. In terms of hardware, you get the 12nm Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 chipset that can reach up to a 2.0GHz clocking speed. Furthermore, the Galaxy S13 is available in 3GB/4GB RAM with 32GB/64GB/128GB internal storage. Alongside this, you also get an SD card slot to extend storage. Unfortunately, Gorilla glass protection is missing on the phone. The so-called quad-camera setup on the Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) includes the 50MP primary, 5MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, and a 2MP depth lens. Apart from this, you get an 8MP selfie lens on the front, while you can record 1080p videos at 30 fps from both cameras without any gyro-EIS support. The phone has a side-mounted fingerprint scanner for biometric authentication and other necessary comms and sensors.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.07.2022
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) was announced in June 2022 and caters to the upper mid-range segment. The phone holds a 6.6 inches PLS LCD display panel with a 400-pixel density. Besides this, the device runs on Android 12 OS supported by One UI 4.1 user interface. In terms of hardware, you get the 12nm Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 chipset that can reach up to a 2.0GHz clocking speed. Furthermore, the Galaxy S13 is available in 3GB/4GB RAM with 32GB/64GB/128GB internal storage. Alongside this, you also get an SD card slot to extend storage. Unfortunately, Gorilla glass protection is missing on the phone. The so-called quad-camera setup on the Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) includes the 50MP primary, 5MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, and a 2MP depth lens. Apart from this, you get an 8MP selfie lens on the front, while you can record 1080p videos at 30 fps from both cameras without any gyro-EIS support. The phone has a side-mounted fingerprint scanner for biometric authentication and other necessary comms and sensors.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.07.2022
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
Finally, for the price of RM799, this is a decent phone. It’s pretty standard in terms of what it can do and combined with some additional features from Samsung’s One UI Core, it’s a pretty good deal.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.07.2022
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
Finally, for the price of RM799, this is a decent phone. It’s pretty standard in terms of what it can do and combined with some additional features from Samsung’s One UI Core, it’s a pretty good deal.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.07.2022
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A13 adds a surprising amount of features and value for what you pay for that edge out the competition in its price range. You get a large FHD+ display, expandable storage, the latest Android 12 running under the hood, a 3.5mm audio jack and excellent battery life for RM799. If you’re on a tight budget and need a reliable Samsung-issued budget phone, you can’t go wrong with this. If you’re on a much more modest budget, the Galaxy A03 is worth a look which offers less RAM, a lower resolution display, less storage and a smaller camera for RM549. The Samsung Galaxy A13 is a budget phone that has a large LCD display paired with excellent battery life. Add in a 3.5mm audio jack as well as expandable storage which its larger siblings lack and it makes a compelling proposition for those seeking a budget Samsung workhorse phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Preis: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A13 adds a surprising amount of features and value for what you pay for that edge out the competition in its price range. You get a large FHD+ display, expandable storage, the latest Android 12 running under the hood, a 3.5mm audio jack and excellent battery life for RM799. If you’re on a tight budget and need a reliable Samsung-issued budget phone, you can’t go wrong with this. If you’re on a much more modest budget, the Galaxy A03 is worth a look which offers less RAM, a lower resolution display, less storage and a smaller camera for RM549. The Samsung Galaxy A13 is a budget phone that has a large LCD display paired with excellent battery life. Add in a 3.5mm audio jack as well as expandable storage which its larger siblings lack and it makes a compelling proposition for those seeking a budget Samsung workhorse phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Preis: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.05.2022
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.05.2022
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
Besides its very appealing price, the Samsung Galaxy A13 only manages to be 'good enough' in most of the areas that matter for a smartphone (from the camera to the battery life) – but for some users that's going to make it a tempting, value-for-money deal.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
Besides its very appealing price, the Samsung Galaxy A13 only manages to be 'good enough' in most of the areas that matter for a smartphone (from the camera to the battery life) – but for some users that's going to make it a tempting, value-for-money deal.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
The Galaxy A13 should be a slam dunk for Samsung. Anyone looking for a budget phone will see the brand, the low price and think it’s a safe bet. But with such poor performance compared to certain rivals, it isn’t. As long as you’re happy to accept that this isn’t going to feel like a fast device and you’re tempted by the good main camera and Samsung OneUI, then at the discounted prices you’ll find from retailers, it’s just about worth buying. But for the Galaxy A13’s RRP, you can get far better performance as well as luxuries such as a 90Hz AMOLED screen, making it difficult to recommend it over the aforementioned Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 and Moto G31. There are trade-offs to make with any cheap phone, so be sure to read our reviews and our roundup of the best budget phones before making your final choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
The Galaxy A13 should be a slam dunk for Samsung. Anyone looking for a budget phone will see the brand, the low price and think it’s a safe bet. But with such poor performance compared to certain rivals, it isn’t. As long as you’re happy to accept that this isn’t going to feel like a fast device and you’re tempted by the good main camera and Samsung OneUI, then at the discounted prices you’ll find from retailers, it’s just about worth buying. But for the Galaxy A13’s RRP, you can get far better performance as well as luxuries such as a 90Hz AMOLED screen, making it difficult to recommend it over the aforementioned Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 and Moto G31. There are trade-offs to make with any cheap phone, so be sure to read our reviews and our roundup of the best budget phones before making your final choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The previous Galaxy A12 has been kicking around for a while now, and it’s certainly a bit outdated by modern standards. It didn’t initially receive a recommendation in our review, but with 2022 updates to the cameras, design and software, the Galaxy A13 was perfectly positioned to finally make an appearance on our best budget smartphones list. Except Samsung really missed the mark with this one. Its decision to opt for one of the weakest mobile chipsets we’ve tested in quite some time is a baffling one, and the lack of 5G connectivity is a glaring omission as well. Neither the extra ultrawide camera nor the 1080p screen are enough of an incentive to mask the fact that we’re getting the short end of the stick. It might be dirt cheap, but don’t let Samsung fool you – you can do better for the price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The previous Galaxy A12 has been kicking around for a while now, and it’s certainly a bit outdated by modern standards. It didn’t initially receive a recommendation in our review, but with 2022 updates to the cameras, design and software, the Galaxy A13 was perfectly positioned to finally make an appearance on our best budget smartphones list. Except Samsung really missed the mark with this one. Its decision to opt for one of the weakest mobile chipsets we’ve tested in quite some time is a baffling one, and the lack of 5G connectivity is a glaring omission as well. Neither the extra ultrawide camera nor the 1080p screen are enough of an incentive to mask the fact that we’re getting the short end of the stick. It might be dirt cheap, but don’t let Samsung fool you – you can do better for the price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
There is a lot that can go wrong when creating a phone, especially a budget one. The trouble is that most of these devices look very similar on paper. You have to spend some time with them to uncover any issues hidden beneath the surfaces and unfortunately we located a few pretty major ones on the Galaxy A13. It's a real shame since the Galaxy A13 still delivers in other key aspects. It has stellar battery life, and its cameras, while not exactly impressive, benefit from mature processing and deliver decent results. We just can't recommend the Galaxy A13, especially since Samsung itself has other better and more well-rounded Galaxy devices in the same price range to get instead.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 54%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
There is a lot that can go wrong when creating a phone, especially a budget one. The trouble is that most of these devices look very similar on paper. You have to spend some time with them to uncover any issues hidden beneath the surfaces and unfortunately we located a few pretty major ones on the Galaxy A13. It's a real shame since the Galaxy A13 still delivers in other key aspects. It has stellar battery life, and its cameras, while not exactly impressive, benefit from mature processing and deliver decent results. We just can't recommend the Galaxy A13, especially since Samsung itself has other better and more well-rounded Galaxy devices in the same price range to get instead.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 54%
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is the best-selling Android smartphone for 2021, and the Galaxy A13 does have big shoes to fill in various markets including the Philippines. It’s more expensive than its predecessor, but the Galaxy A13 does get a slew of upgrades–including a design makeover–to shape itself as a promising contender in the already-saturated budget segment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is the best-selling Android smartphone for 2021, and the Galaxy A13 does have big shoes to fill in various markets including the Philippines. It’s more expensive than its predecessor, but the Galaxy A13 does get a slew of upgrades–including a design makeover–to shape itself as a promising contender in the already-saturated budget segment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; decent main camera; good connectivity. Negative: Average performance; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.04.2022
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; decent main camera; good connectivity. Negative: Average performance; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.04.2022
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Negative: High price; average performance; poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.05.2022
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Negative: High price; average performance; poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.05.2022
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76%
Quelle: Clubic FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 50% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Clubic FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 50% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 40% Ergonomie: 40%
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 40% Ergonomie: 40%
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; compact size; great built quality; big screen; nice display; decent hardware; good performance; excellent battery life; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.07.2022
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; compact size; great built quality; big screen; nice display; decent hardware; good performance; excellent battery life; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.07.2022
Quelle: Testado CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Leistung: 65% Ausstattung: 65% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Testado CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Leistung: 65% Ausstattung: 65% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Decent gaming performance; long battery life; good processor; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.11.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Decent gaming performance; long battery life; good processor; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.11.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; nice cameras; long battery life; good price. Negative: Average performance; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.04.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; nice cameras; long battery life; good price. Negative: Average performance; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Decent performance; beautiful display; large battery capacity; great cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Decent performance; beautiful display; large battery capacity; great cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; excellent cameras; high performance; impressive autonomy; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; excellent cameras; high performance; impressive autonomy; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Nice quad cameras; powerful processor; high performance; big screen; beautiful display; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 13.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Nice quad cameras; powerful processor; high performance; big screen; beautiful display; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 13.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; nice cameras; decent hardware; good performance; very long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; nice cameras; decent hardware; good performance; very long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Decent cameras; nice display; powerful processor; excellent battery life.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Decent cameras; nice display; powerful processor; excellent battery life.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2022
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; good price; nice cameras; large battery capacity. Negative: Poor display.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.03.2022
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; good price; nice cameras; large battery capacity. Negative: Poor display.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.03.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; nice quad cameras; powerful processor; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.03.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; nice quad cameras; powerful processor; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.03.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; powerful hardware; high performance; nice cameras; long battery life.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.03.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; powerful hardware; high performance; nice cameras; long battery life.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.03.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; nice cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; nice cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Jagat Review ID→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; 128GB ROM; MicroSD card slot; nice display. Negative: Average gaming performance; poor cameras; slow charging; no NFC module; mono speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.03.2022
Quelle: Jagat Review ID→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; 128GB ROM; MicroSD card slot; nice display. Negative: Average gaming performance; poor cameras; slow charging; no NFC module; mono speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.03.2022
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: M3 PC för alla SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50%
Quelle: M3 PC för alla SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A53Prozessor: Samsung Exynos Exynos 1280
Grafikkarte: ARM Mali-G68 MP4
Bildschirm: 6.50 Zoll, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.189kg
Preis: 449 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Das Samsung Galaxy A53 5G führt eine Bestseller-Reihe fort und setzt dabei auf ein komplett neues SoC und einen stärkeren Akku. In anderen Bereichen wie der Kamera tut sich aber nichts. Im Test erfahren Sie, ob das Galaxy A53 von uns dennoch eine Empfehlung bekommt.
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A53 5G ist keine Revolution, sondern eher eine Art Facelift für die A-Serie. So verbaut Samsung einen stärkeren Akku und erstmals den Exynos-1280-Prozessor. Im Test zeigte das Smartphone trotz 120-Hertz-Display eine starke Akkulaufzeit. Gleichzeitig aber enttäuschte es beim Prozessortempo: Das ist okay, aber nicht schnell – wie schon beim Vorgänger A52. Dafür überzeugte die Kamera sowohl tags als auch bei Dämmerungs-Beleuchtung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A53 5G ist keine Revolution, sondern eher eine Art Facelift für die A-Serie. So verbaut Samsung einen stärkeren Akku und erstmals den Exynos-1280-Prozessor. Im Test zeigte das Smartphone trotz 120-Hertz-Display eine starke Akkulaufzeit. Gleichzeitig aber enttäuschte es beim Prozessortempo: Das ist okay, aber nicht schnell – wie schon beim Vorgänger A52. Dafür überzeugte die Kamera sowohl tags als auch bei Dämmerungs-Beleuchtung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A53 5G ist keine Revolution, sondern eher eine Art Facelift für die A-Serie. So verbaut Samsung einen stärkeren Akku und erstmals den Exynos-1280-Prozessor. Im Test zeigte das Smartphone trotz 120-Hertz-Display eine starke Akkulaufzeit. Gleichzeitig aber enttäuschte es beim Prozessortempo: Das ist okay, aber nicht schnell – wie schon beim Vorgänger A52. Dafür überzeugte die Kamera sowohl tags als auch bei Dämmerungs-Beleuchtung. Nur beim Zoomen hapert es an der Bildqualität. Weitere Pluspunkte: Das A53 ist wasserdicht, hat 5G und Samsung garantiert Android-Updates bis 2026, Sicherheitspatches sogar bis 2027.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A53 5G ist keine Revolution, sondern eher eine Art Facelift für die A-Serie. So verbaut Samsung einen stärkeren Akku und erstmals den Exynos-1280-Prozessor. Im Test zeigte das Smartphone trotz 120-Hertz-Display eine starke Akkulaufzeit. Gleichzeitig aber enttäuschte es beim Prozessortempo: Das ist okay, aber nicht schnell – wie schon beim Vorgänger A52. Dafür überzeugte die Kamera sowohl tags als auch bei Dämmerungs-Beleuchtung. Nur beim Zoomen hapert es an der Bildqualität. Weitere Pluspunkte: Das A53 ist wasserdicht, hat 5G und Samsung garantiert Android-Updates bis 2026, Sicherheitspatches sogar bis 2027.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Das Galaxy A53 ist hübsch, hat eine hervorragende Kamera und wird lange mit Updates versorgt. Das sind die drei Aspekte, die auch 2023 für das Handy sprechen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Ausstattung: 70% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Das Galaxy A53 ist hübsch, hat eine hervorragende Kamera und wird lange mit Updates versorgt. Das sind die drei Aspekte, die auch 2023 für das Handy sprechen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Ausstattung: 70% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Das Galaxy A53 wiederholt nicht die große Entwicklung der A52-Generation. Daher ist es schwer, es den Nutzern des Galaxy A52 oder des A52s als Upgrade zu empfehlen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.05.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Das Galaxy A53 wiederholt nicht die große Entwicklung der A52-Generation. Daher ist es schwer, es den Nutzern des Galaxy A52 oder des A52s als Upgrade zu empfehlen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.05.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A53 5G ist keine Revolution, sondern eher eine Art Facelift für die A-Serie. So verbaut Samsung einen stärkeren Akku und erstmals den Exynos-1280-Prozessor. Im Test zeigte das Smartphone trotz 120-Hertz-Display eine starke Akkulaufzeit. Gleichzeitig aber enttäuschte es beim Prozessortempo: Das ist okay, aber nicht schnell – wie schon beim Vorgänger A52. Dafür überzeugte die Kamera sowohl tags als auch bei Dämmerungs-Beleuchtung. Nur beim Zoomen hapert es an der Bildqualität. Weitere Pluspunkte: Das A53 ist wasserdicht, hat 5G und Samsung garantiert Android-Updates bis 2026, Sicherheitspatches sogar bis 2027.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.05.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A53 5G ist keine Revolution, sondern eher eine Art Facelift für die A-Serie. So verbaut Samsung einen stärkeren Akku und erstmals den Exynos-1280-Prozessor. Im Test zeigte das Smartphone trotz 120-Hertz-Display eine starke Akkulaufzeit. Gleichzeitig aber enttäuschte es beim Prozessortempo: Das ist okay, aber nicht schnell – wie schon beim Vorgänger A52. Dafür überzeugte die Kamera sowohl tags als auch bei Dämmerungs-Beleuchtung. Nur beim Zoomen hapert es an der Bildqualität. Weitere Pluspunkte: Das A53 ist wasserdicht, hat 5G und Samsung garantiert Android-Updates bis 2026, Sicherheitspatches sogar bis 2027.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.05.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Inside Handy
Auf den ersten Blick ist das Samsung Galaxy A53 ein normales Smartphone der gehobenen Mittelklasse ohne ein besonderes Highlight.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.03.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Inside Handy
Auf den ersten Blick ist das Samsung Galaxy A53 ein normales Smartphone der gehobenen Mittelklasse ohne ein besonderes Highlight.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.03.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A53 5G ist keine Revolution, sondern eher eine Art Facelift für die A-Serie. So verbaut Samsung einen stärkeren Akku und erstmals den Exynos-1280-Prozessor. Im Test zeigte das Smartphone trotz 120-Hertz-Display eine starke Akkulaufzeit. Gleichzeitig aber enttäuschte es beim Prozessortempo: Das ist okay, aber nicht schnell – wie schon beim Vorgänger A52. Dafür überzeugte die Kamera sowohl tags als auch bei Dämmerungs-Beleuchtung. Nur beim Zoomen hapert es an der Bildqualität. Weitere Pluspunkte: Das A53 ist wasserdicht, hat 5G und Samsung garantiert Android-Updates bis 2026, Sicherheitspatches sogar bis 2027.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A53 5G ist keine Revolution, sondern eher eine Art Facelift für die A-Serie. So verbaut Samsung einen stärkeren Akku und erstmals den Exynos-1280-Prozessor. Im Test zeigte das Smartphone trotz 120-Hertz-Display eine starke Akkulaufzeit. Gleichzeitig aber enttäuschte es beim Prozessortempo: Das ist okay, aber nicht schnell – wie schon beim Vorgänger A52. Dafür überzeugte die Kamera sowohl tags als auch bei Dämmerungs-Beleuchtung. Nur beim Zoomen hapert es an der Bildqualität. Weitere Pluspunkte: Das A53 ist wasserdicht, hat 5G und Samsung garantiert Android-Updates bis 2026, Sicherheitspatches sogar bis 2027.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Das Galaxy A53 ist hübsch, hat eine hervorragende Kamera und wird lange mit Updates versorgt. Das sind die drei Aspekte, die für das Handy sprechen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Ausstattung: 70% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Das Galaxy A53 ist hübsch, hat eine hervorragende Kamera und wird lange mit Updates versorgt. Das sind die drei Aspekte, die für das Handy sprechen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Ausstattung: 70% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Tech Stage
Das Samsung Galaxy A53 macht vieles richtig – leider aber nicht alles und echte Neuerungen halten sich insgesamt in Grenzen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Stage
Das Samsung Galaxy A53 macht vieles richtig – leider aber nicht alles und echte Neuerungen halten sich insgesamt in Grenzen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A53 5G ist keine Revolution, sondern eher eine Art Facelift für die A-Serie. So verbaut Samsung einen stärkeren Akku und erstmals den Exynos-1280-Prozessor. Im Test zeigte das Smartphone trotz 120-Hertz-Display eine starke Akkulaufzeit. Gleichzeitig aber enttäuschte es beim Prozessortempo: Das ist okay, aber nicht schnell – wie schon beim Vorgänger A52. Dafür überzeugte die Kamera sowohl tags als auch bei Dämmerungs-Beleuchtung. Nur beim Zoomen hapert es an der Bildqualität. Weitere Pluspunkte: Das A53 ist wasserdicht, hat 5G und Samsung garantiert Android-Updates bis 2026, Sicherheitspatches sogar bis 2027.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A53 5G ist keine Revolution, sondern eher eine Art Facelift für die A-Serie. So verbaut Samsung einen stärkeren Akku und erstmals den Exynos-1280-Prozessor. Im Test zeigte das Smartphone trotz 120-Hertz-Display eine starke Akkulaufzeit. Gleichzeitig aber enttäuschte es beim Prozessortempo: Das ist okay, aber nicht schnell – wie schon beim Vorgänger A52. Dafür überzeugte die Kamera sowohl tags als auch bei Dämmerungs-Beleuchtung. Nur beim Zoomen hapert es an der Bildqualität. Weitere Pluspunkte: Das A53 ist wasserdicht, hat 5G und Samsung garantiert Android-Updates bis 2026, Sicherheitspatches sogar bis 2027.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Chip (Print) - 9/22
Dank neuer Prozessoren sind 5G-Smartphones schon für unter 200 Euro zu haben. Aber längst nicht alle Modelle sind eine Empfehlung wert.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.08.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 93%
Quelle: Chip (Print) - 9/22
Dank neuer Prozessoren sind 5G-Smartphones schon für unter 200 Euro zu haben. Aber längst nicht alle Modelle sind eine Empfehlung wert.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.08.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 93%
Quelle: Connect - 7/22
Die neue A-Serie schindet optisch ordentlich Eindruck, und technisch kann Samsung aus dem Vollen schöpfen.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Connect - 7/22
Die neue A-Serie schindet optisch ordentlich Eindruck, und technisch kann Samsung aus dem Vollen schöpfen.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Das Galaxy A53 ist hübsch, hat eine hervorragende Kamera und wird lange mit Updates versorgt. Das sind die drei Aspekte, die für das Handy sprechen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Ausstattung: 70% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Das Galaxy A53 ist hübsch, hat eine hervorragende Kamera und wird lange mit Updates versorgt. Das sind die drei Aspekte, die für das Handy sprechen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Ausstattung: 70% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Futurezone.at
Wer auf der Suche nach einem neuen Handy ist und dafür keine 1.000 Euro ausgeben will, wird um das Samsung Galaxy A53 nicht herumkommen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.05.2022
Quelle: Futurezone.at
Wer auf der Suche nach einem neuen Handy ist und dafür keine 1.000 Euro ausgeben will, wird um das Samsung Galaxy A53 nicht herumkommen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.05.2022
Quelle: Basic Tutorials
Das Wichtigste vorweg: Beim Samsung Galaxy A53 5G handelt es sich um ein gutes Mittelklasse-Smartphone mit Stärken und Schwächen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Basic Tutorials
Das Wichtigste vorweg: Beim Samsung Galaxy A53 5G handelt es sich um ein gutes Mittelklasse-Smartphone mit Stärken und Schwächen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Das Galaxy A53 wiederholt nicht die große Entwicklung der A52-Generation. Daher ist es schwer, es den Nutzern des Galaxy A52 oder des A52s als Upgrade zu empfehlen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Das Galaxy A53 wiederholt nicht die große Entwicklung der A52-Generation. Daher ist es schwer, es den Nutzern des Galaxy A52 oder des A52s als Upgrade zu empfehlen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A53 5G ist keine Revolution, sondern eher eine Art Facelift für die A-Serie. So verbaut Samsung einen stärkeren Akku und erstmals den Exynos-1280-Prozessor. Im Test zeigte das Smartphone trotz 120-Hertz-Display eine starke Akkulaufzeit. Gleichzeitig aber enttäuschte es beim Prozessortempo: Das ist okay, aber nicht schnell – wie schon beim Vorgänger A52. Dafür überzeugte die Kamera sowohl tags als auch bei Dämmerungs-Beleuchtung. Nur beim Zoomen hapert es an der Bildqualität. Weitere Pluspunkte: Das A53 ist wasserdicht, hat 5G und Samsung garantiert Android-Updates bis 2026, Sicherheitspatches sogar bis 2027.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A53 5G ist keine Revolution, sondern eher eine Art Facelift für die A-Serie. So verbaut Samsung einen stärkeren Akku und erstmals den Exynos-1280-Prozessor. Im Test zeigte das Smartphone trotz 120-Hertz-Display eine starke Akkulaufzeit. Gleichzeitig aber enttäuschte es beim Prozessortempo: Das ist okay, aber nicht schnell – wie schon beim Vorgänger A52. Dafür überzeugte die Kamera sowohl tags als auch bei Dämmerungs-Beleuchtung. Nur beim Zoomen hapert es an der Bildqualität. Weitere Pluspunkte: Das A53 ist wasserdicht, hat 5G und Samsung garantiert Android-Updates bis 2026, Sicherheitspatches sogar bis 2027.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Curved
Samsung gelingt mit dem Galaxy A53 5G ein Quantensprung. Leider nicht im Sinne der eigentlichen Redewendung, sondern bildlich gemeint.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 72% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85%
Quelle: Curved
Samsung gelingt mit dem Galaxy A53 5G ein Quantensprung. Leider nicht im Sinne der eigentlichen Redewendung, sondern bildlich gemeint.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 72% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85%
Quelle: A1 Blog
Das Fazit zum Galaxy A53 fällt ähnlich wie jenes zum Galaxy A33 aus: Solide Leistung in einem attraktiven Gesamtpaket.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.05.2022
Quelle: A1 Blog
Das Fazit zum Galaxy A53 fällt ähnlich wie jenes zum Galaxy A33 aus: Solide Leistung in einem attraktiven Gesamtpaket.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.05.2022
Quelle: Computerbild
Die Unterschiede zwischen beiden Generationen sind gering. Doch dank leicht besserer Kamera (vermutlich durch weiterentwickelter Bildverarbeitung), längeren Updates und 5G geht das Galaxy A53 als Sieger aus dem Vergleich hervor. Wer aber Wert auf Tempo legt, greift lieber zu einer anderen Alternative: Das Galaxy A52s hat einen weitaus schnelleren Prozessor als das A53. Vor der Kaufentscheidung empfiehlt sich auch ein Preisvergleich. Zum Testzeitpunkt gab es das Galaxy A53 ab 350 Euro, das Galaxy A52 ab 260 Euro und das Galaxy A52s ab 320 Euro (Stand: 21. April 2022).
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Die Unterschiede zwischen beiden Generationen sind gering. Doch dank leicht besserer Kamera (vermutlich durch weiterentwickelter Bildverarbeitung), längeren Updates und 5G geht das Galaxy A53 als Sieger aus dem Vergleich hervor. Wer aber Wert auf Tempo legt, greift lieber zu einer anderen Alternative: Das Galaxy A52s hat einen weitaus schnelleren Prozessor als das A53. Vor der Kaufentscheidung empfiehlt sich auch ein Preisvergleich. Zum Testzeitpunkt gab es das Galaxy A53 ab 350 Euro, das Galaxy A52 ab 260 Euro und das Galaxy A52s ab 320 Euro (Stand: 21. April 2022).
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung Galaxy A53 lässt uns mit vielen Fragezeichen im Kopf zurück. Das Smartphone hat weniger Leistung als der Vorgänger.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung Galaxy A53 lässt uns mit vielen Fragezeichen im Kopf zurück. Das Smartphone hat weniger Leistung als der Vorgänger.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Inside Handy
Auf den ersten Blick ist das Samsung Galaxy A53 ein normales Smartphone der gehobenen Mittelklasse ohne ein besonderes Highlight wie etwa eine 108 Megapixel-Kamera oder extrem schnelles Laden.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Inside Handy
Auf den ersten Blick ist das Samsung Galaxy A53 ein normales Smartphone der gehobenen Mittelklasse ohne ein besonderes Highlight wie etwa eine 108 Megapixel-Kamera oder extrem schnelles Laden.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Der lange Software-Support ist das Hauptargument für den Kauf des Galaxy A53. Hardwareseitig ist das Gerät solide, aber nicht herausragend.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Netzwelt
Der lange Software-Support ist das Hauptargument für den Kauf des Galaxy A53. Hardwareseitig ist das Gerät solide, aber nicht herausragend.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A53 setzt Samsung neue Schwerpunkte in der unteren Mittelklasse: mehr Akku-Laufzeit statt mehr Tempo. Der Akku fällt mit 5.000 mAh sehr stark aus – stärker als beim Vorgänger. Die Kamera ist ordentlich, taugt sogar für kleinere Zoom-Stufen und Ultraweit-Aufnahmen. Das Gehäuse ist wasserdicht, 5G ist an Bord. Dafür ist der neue Exynos-1280-Prozessor langsamer als das A52s 5G, erreicht nur das Niveau des Galaxy A52 5G. Weiterer Haken: Eine Klinkenbuchse für Kopfhörer mit Kabel fehlt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.03.2022
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A53 setzt Samsung neue Schwerpunkte in der unteren Mittelklasse: mehr Akku-Laufzeit statt mehr Tempo. Der Akku fällt mit 5.000 mAh sehr stark aus – stärker als beim Vorgänger. Die Kamera ist ordentlich, taugt sogar für kleinere Zoom-Stufen und Ultraweit-Aufnahmen. Das Gehäuse ist wasserdicht, 5G ist an Bord. Dafür ist der neue Exynos-1280-Prozessor langsamer als das A52s 5G, erreicht nur das Niveau des Galaxy A52 5G. Weiterer Haken: Eine Klinkenbuchse für Kopfhörer mit Kabel fehlt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.03.2022
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.10.2024
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.10.2024
Quelle: Amateur Photographer EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, around now for nearly two years, offers incredible value for money for people on a budget. In fact, there are just a few minor differences between this phone and the newer, more expensive Samsung A54 or A55. There is an improvement in camera performance with the newer model, but if your budget is tight, then this presents a viable and value alternative. Whether you prefer the glass back of the A54 or the curved camera island on the back of the A53 is probably down to personal preference.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.09.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Amateur Photographer EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, around now for nearly two years, offers incredible value for money for people on a budget. In fact, there are just a few minor differences between this phone and the newer, more expensive Samsung A54 or A55. There is an improvement in camera performance with the newer model, but if your budget is tight, then this presents a viable and value alternative. Whether you prefer the glass back of the A54 or the curved camera island on the back of the A53 is probably down to personal preference.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.09.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Headlines EN→DE
In a lot of ways, the Galaxy A53 5G is the next best thing if you can’t afford a Galaxy S phone. It’s a mid-ranger through and through, but it punches above its weight in some areas. You won’t find many phones with as good of a media consumption experience as this phone’s with its beautiful display and amazing speakers. The camera isn’t flagship tier, but it gets the job done with good flair. You’ll be able to take some nice pictures that will look good on social media. The only letdown in my experience has been the performance. This phone is going to lag at points in your usage, and you won’t be able to play the most graphics-intensive games.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Headlines EN→DE
In a lot of ways, the Galaxy A53 5G is the next best thing if you can’t afford a Galaxy S phone. It’s a mid-ranger through and through, but it punches above its weight in some areas. You won’t find many phones with as good of a media consumption experience as this phone’s with its beautiful display and amazing speakers. The camera isn’t flagship tier, but it gets the job done with good flair. You’ll be able to take some nice pictures that will look good on social media. The only letdown in my experience has been the performance. This phone is going to lag at points in your usage, and you won’t be able to play the most graphics-intensive games.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Amateur Photographer EN→DE
Whether you prefer the glass back of the A54 or the curved camera island on the back of the A53 is probably down to personal preference. But if you’re looking to save yourself some money, then the A53 is a good choice. We’d also be very tempted to consider the Google Pixel 6A as an alternative, as this is a similar price and offers a great dual camera setup.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Amateur Photographer EN→DE
Whether you prefer the glass back of the A54 or the curved camera island on the back of the A53 is probably down to personal preference. But if you’re looking to save yourself some money, then the A53 is a good choice. We’d also be very tempted to consider the Google Pixel 6A as an alternative, as this is a similar price and offers a great dual camera setup.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Amateur Photographer EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, now that it’s been out for more than a year, offers incredible value for money for people on a tighter budget. In fact, there’s not a lot of difference between this phone, and the newer, more expensive A54, apart from a few minor differences. There is an improvement in camera performance with the newer model, but if your budget is tight, then it might be out of the question. Whether you prefer the glass back of the A54 or the curved camera island on the back of the A53 is probably down to personal preference. But if you’re looking to save yourself some money, then the A53 is a good choice. We’d also be very tempted to consider the Google Pixel 6A as an alternative, as this is a similar price and offers a great dual camera setup.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.08.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Amateur Photographer EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, now that it’s been out for more than a year, offers incredible value for money for people on a tighter budget. In fact, there’s not a lot of difference between this phone, and the newer, more expensive A54, apart from a few minor differences. There is an improvement in camera performance with the newer model, but if your budget is tight, then it might be out of the question. Whether you prefer the glass back of the A54 or the curved camera island on the back of the A53 is probably down to personal preference. But if you’re looking to save yourself some money, then the A53 is a good choice. We’d also be very tempted to consider the Google Pixel 6A as an alternative, as this is a similar price and offers a great dual camera setup.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.08.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Know Your Mobile EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a superbly appointed phone that delivers massively in all the most important areas. It looks great, it will get four years’ worth of security updates and three major Android versions, the camera is very good, the battery life excellent, and it’ll do 5G, and it has a 120Hz AMOLED display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Know Your Mobile EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a superbly appointed phone that delivers massively in all the most important areas. It looks great, it will get four years’ worth of security updates and three major Android versions, the camera is very good, the battery life excellent, and it’ll do 5G, and it has a 120Hz AMOLED display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G is a remarkably well-rounded rival to this year’s high-priced flagships. If your sights are set on the Galaxy S22 but you don’t have the funds to buy one, then the A53 5G is every bit the next best thing. It simply brings so much to the table that I’d be mad not to give the Galaxy A53 5G a Best Buy award. It’s not perfect but, at this price, nothing ever is and, besides, it gets pretty darn close.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G is a remarkably well-rounded rival to this year’s high-priced flagships. If your sights are set on the Galaxy S22 but you don’t have the funds to buy one, then the A53 5G is every bit the next best thing. It simply brings so much to the table that I’d be mad not to give the Galaxy A53 5G a Best Buy award. It’s not perfect but, at this price, nothing ever is and, besides, it gets pretty darn close.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
An attractive phone with a good-looking screen and impressive cameras for the price, the Samsung Galaxy A53 offers good value for money overall; but with its slow charging and stuttery performance, it’s not for everyone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 40% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
An attractive phone with a good-looking screen and impressive cameras for the price, the Samsung Galaxy A53 offers good value for money overall; but with its slow charging and stuttery performance, it’s not for everyone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 40% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: GSM Choice EN→DE
In terms of performance, it could also be a bit better - its performance is probably even worse than its predecessor, which already looks a bit strange. I invariably complain about the lack of a minijack, and others may be disturbed by the lack of a premium-style housing. There is also a price at which Galaxy A53 5G debuted - I would not call it a bargain. But remember, there are promotions, and in promotion you can think about it more.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.07.2022
Quelle: GSM Choice EN→DE
In terms of performance, it could also be a bit better - its performance is probably even worse than its predecessor, which already looks a bit strange. I invariably complain about the lack of a minijack, and others may be disturbed by the lack of a premium-style housing. There is also a price at which Galaxy A53 5G debuted - I would not call it a bargain. But remember, there are promotions, and in promotion you can think about it more.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.07.2022
Quelle: GSM Choice EN→DE
In terms of performance, it could also be a bit better - its performance is probably even worse than its predecessor, which already looks a bit strange. I invariably complain about the lack of a minijack, and others may be disturbed by the lack of a premium-style housing. There is also a price at which Galaxy A53 5G debuted - I would not call it a bargain. But remember, there are promotions, and in promotion you can think about it more.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.07.2022
Quelle: GSM Choice EN→DE
In terms of performance, it could also be a bit better - its performance is probably even worse than its predecessor, which already looks a bit strange. I invariably complain about the lack of a minijack, and others may be disturbed by the lack of a premium-style housing. There is also a price at which Galaxy A53 5G debuted - I would not call it a bargain. But remember, there are promotions, and in promotion you can think about it more.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.07.2022
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
While this smartphone has many strengths such as an elegant design, impressive display, and great cameras, alongside a massive battery and 5G connectivity. The phone doesn’t look underwhelming in any way. Though there are some compromises such as missing wireless charging and reverse charging support, still the device specs are quite appreciable as you get a decent all-around package. The only concern for this smartphone is a bit high pricing, so you must check for alternatives such as the Realme Narzo 50 Pro which comes with similar specs in a decent price range, however, the final decision is up to you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.06.2022
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
While this smartphone has many strengths such as an elegant design, impressive display, and great cameras, alongside a massive battery and 5G connectivity. The phone doesn’t look underwhelming in any way. Though there are some compromises such as missing wireless charging and reverse charging support, still the device specs are quite appreciable as you get a decent all-around package. The only concern for this smartphone is a bit high pricing, so you must check for alternatives such as the Realme Narzo 50 Pro which comes with similar specs in a decent price range, however, the final decision is up to you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.06.2022
Quelle: Digital Trends EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a reasonably priced, reliable, pretty, and capable everyday smartphone, suited to anyone who isn’t going to be playing demanding games for hours each day and is mainly interested in the camera for photos to share with friends online. The Galaxy A52’s major downside, the fingerprint sensor, has been fixed for the A53, but the strife it caused has been replaced by sluggish performance in some situations. It’s not so bothersome you’ll hate the phone, though, and I’ve used it happily as my primary device without wanting to change my SIM early. You’re getting Samsung’s overall quality, its highly livable software, and a screen built for great-looking video — all for less money than the predecessor cost. The Galaxy A53 5G is a recommended, and very sensible, purchase, but it’s slightly disappointing it doesn’t look or feel like a step forward compared to the A52 or A52S.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Digital Trends EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a reasonably priced, reliable, pretty, and capable everyday smartphone, suited to anyone who isn’t going to be playing demanding games for hours each day and is mainly interested in the camera for photos to share with friends online. The Galaxy A52’s major downside, the fingerprint sensor, has been fixed for the A53, but the strife it caused has been replaced by sluggish performance in some situations. It’s not so bothersome you’ll hate the phone, though, and I’ve used it happily as my primary device without wanting to change my SIM early. You’re getting Samsung’s overall quality, its highly livable software, and a screen built for great-looking video — all for less money than the predecessor cost. The Galaxy A53 5G is a recommended, and very sensible, purchase, but it’s slightly disappointing it doesn’t look or feel like a step forward compared to the A52 or A52S.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G doesn’t reinvent the wheel, but it doesn’t have to. Instead, Samsung refined the already impressive Galaxy A52 5G and lowered its asking price by $50. The lower price ends up being the cherry on top because the overall package is one of the most impressive you’ll find for under $500. If you already have a Galaxy A52 5G, there’s not enough new here to consider an upgrade, but if you’ve been looking for a reasonably priced way to enter the Samsung ecosystem, the Galaxy A53 5G is an excellent gateway. Samsung’s quartet of rear cameras delivers the goods, both day and night, with the only blemish being the lack of 4K/60fps video recording. The large, 6.5-inch, 120Hz AMOLED display is crisp and smooth, making video streaming enjoyable. You should have no issues pushing the 5,000mAh battery to its limits and it’s not too slow to charge relative to its competitors in the US (outside is another matter). Meanwhile, the Exynos 1280 chipset is far from the most powerful around and may begin to show its age a few years down the line, but it’ll keep pace with your daily needs for a good while.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G doesn’t reinvent the wheel, but it doesn’t have to. Instead, Samsung refined the already impressive Galaxy A52 5G and lowered its asking price by $50. The lower price ends up being the cherry on top because the overall package is one of the most impressive you’ll find for under $500. If you already have a Galaxy A52 5G, there’s not enough new here to consider an upgrade, but if you’ve been looking for a reasonably priced way to enter the Samsung ecosystem, the Galaxy A53 5G is an excellent gateway. Samsung’s quartet of rear cameras delivers the goods, both day and night, with the only blemish being the lack of 4K/60fps video recording. The large, 6.5-inch, 120Hz AMOLED display is crisp and smooth, making video streaming enjoyable. You should have no issues pushing the 5,000mAh battery to its limits and it’s not too slow to charge relative to its competitors in the US (outside is another matter). Meanwhile, the Exynos 1280 chipset is far from the most powerful around and may begin to show its age a few years down the line, but it’ll keep pace with your daily needs for a good while.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Technobig EN→DE
There are no perfect smartphones, but there are successful models. Samsung launched the optimally balanced Galaxy A52 last year, and now it is being replaced by the Galaxy A53. This happens to be one of our favorite phones we’ve written about since the Samsung Galaxy A02 Review. Is it a twin clone with a new index or is it an improved model? We reflect on this in our review.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.06.2022
Quelle: Technobig EN→DE
There are no perfect smartphones, but there are successful models. Samsung launched the optimally balanced Galaxy A52 last year, and now it is being replaced by the Galaxy A53. This happens to be one of our favorite phones we’ve written about since the Samsung Galaxy A02 Review. Is it a twin clone with a new index or is it an improved model? We reflect on this in our review.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.06.2022
Quelle: Stuff TV EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is one of the most standout phones in its price range when it comes to design, display and camera quality. Full of features, it also bravely attempts to distill Samsung’s OneUI 4.1, found in the Galaxy S22 Ultra, into a more affordable package, and on the surface, it succeeds. Slowdown across the interface – whether typing, swiping or tapping, unfortunately stops the Galaxy A53 5G’s highlights making it a great phone across the board, which is a crying shame. If you love the A53’s design and are okay with the idea of waiting for your phone to catch its breath, then by all means, pick up Samsung’s handsome mid-ranger. It gets a lot right. If, however, you’re as impatient as us, grab a OnePlus Nord 2 or Realme 9 Pro+, or save your pennies and pick up an S21 FE, a Poco F3, or a Poco F4 GT.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Stuff TV EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is one of the most standout phones in its price range when it comes to design, display and camera quality. Full of features, it also bravely attempts to distill Samsung’s OneUI 4.1, found in the Galaxy S22 Ultra, into a more affordable package, and on the surface, it succeeds. Slowdown across the interface – whether typing, swiping or tapping, unfortunately stops the Galaxy A53 5G’s highlights making it a great phone across the board, which is a crying shame. If you love the A53’s design and are okay with the idea of waiting for your phone to catch its breath, then by all means, pick up Samsung’s handsome mid-ranger. It gets a lot right. If, however, you’re as impatient as us, grab a OnePlus Nord 2 or Realme 9 Pro+, or save your pennies and pick up an S21 FE, a Poco F3, or a Poco F4 GT.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Phandroid EN→DE
If you’re on a tight budget, I think the Galaxy S53 is an incredible phone. For $450, there’s really no other device that will deliver everything this phone does, especially in the US, right now. That being said, if you’re willing to wait a few months, Google’s $450 Pixel 6a will go on sale in July and could give the Galaxy S53 a run for its money. The Samsung Galaxy A53 is one of the best mid-range phones you can buy in 2022, but Samsung should be worried about the upcoming Pixel 6a.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Phandroid EN→DE
If you’re on a tight budget, I think the Galaxy S53 is an incredible phone. For $450, there’s really no other device that will deliver everything this phone does, especially in the US, right now. That being said, if you’re willing to wait a few months, Google’s $450 Pixel 6a will go on sale in July and could give the Galaxy S53 a run for its money. The Samsung Galaxy A53 is one of the best mid-range phones you can buy in 2022, but Samsung should be worried about the upcoming Pixel 6a.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Know Your Mobile EN→DE
Is the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G worth buying? I would say, yes, the phone is a great option for anyone that is looking to get the maximum bang for their buck in 2022 without making too many concessions. If you want or need something better, I’d advise that you either wait for the Pixel 6a or pay $150 more today and get the Pixel 6 – it has a better camera, a better CPU, and superior software. But it is more expensive.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.05.2022
Quelle: Know Your Mobile EN→DE
Is the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G worth buying? I would say, yes, the phone is a great option for anyone that is looking to get the maximum bang for their buck in 2022 without making too many concessions. If you want or need something better, I’d advise that you either wait for the Pixel 6a or pay $150 more today and get the Pixel 6 – it has a better camera, a better CPU, and superior software. But it is more expensive.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.05.2022
Quelle: Htxt Africa EN→DE
We have said the same thing when it comes to the more recent Galaxy S devices, but Samsung has a strong formula at the moment and you know precisely what you’re going to get – a reliable phone packed with features built to last and delivering little fuss. The same goes for the A series and the Galaxy A53 5G here. We only wish Samsung kept the bloatware to a minimum and went back to offering chargers and covers in the box. It’s a great value for money mix that did not need tinkering with. If you can stomach the fact that you’ll need to buy the two aforementioned missing elements alongside the A53 5G, this is a device will stand you in good stead and easily dispel any desires to upgrade for a few years.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Htxt Africa EN→DE
We have said the same thing when it comes to the more recent Galaxy S devices, but Samsung has a strong formula at the moment and you know precisely what you’re going to get – a reliable phone packed with features built to last and delivering little fuss. The same goes for the A series and the Galaxy A53 5G here. We only wish Samsung kept the bloatware to a minimum and went back to offering chargers and covers in the box. It’s a great value for money mix that did not need tinkering with. If you can stomach the fact that you’ll need to buy the two aforementioned missing elements alongside the A53 5G, this is a device will stand you in good stead and easily dispel any desires to upgrade for a few years.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G struggled in almost all of our battery tests, resulting in a below-average performance when compared with our entire database. Poor overall efficiency, mainly due to its high discharge current and its low charge efficiency, as well as its weak charging performance (especially in the autonomy gain after a 5-minute charge) all contributed to the A53 5G’s weak score. Overall, autonomy is below average. Whether scrolling on social apps on the go or when streaming music and gaming in calibrated mode, the device just couldn’t hold up. When comparing the Galaxy A53 5G with other similarly priced devices in the High-end segment ($400–$599), it did not fare better. It has the lowest efficiency score for its segment, weighed down by the lowest discharge subscore, and it stands second to last in charging. As of this writing, it ranks last to date among the High-end devices we have tested.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.05.2022
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The lack of a dedicated tele lens means that images captured at tele zoom settings lack detail and show high levels of noise. This is especially true for long-range tele settings. On the plus side, exposure and color are generally good. For video, we tested the device at 1080p resolution and 30fps as video stabilization at 4K resolution is very ineffective. In video mode, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G records well-exposed video clips with vivid colors. Video stabilization is pretty good for the A53’s segment but unfortunately, an unstable autofocus means outdoor and low light videos are often not usable. When the autofocus does its job, the level of detail in 1080p mode is generally quite low. Dynamic range is limited as well and white balance often turns orange in low light. Video artifacts such as color quantization, ringing or ghosting are frequently visible.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.05.2022
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The A53 5G, released in March of this year, is a midrange offering that from the outside shares a similar style and size to the S21 Ultra. At this lower price point, however, it lacks the top-end chipset and some other flagship extras. On the audio front, it has stereo speakers. No audio jack is on offer, but the standard USB Type-C port can serve double duty, charging and delivering sound to headphones. With a global score of 73, the A53 5G surpassed last year’s A52 5G, which notched a 69. At this price point, the A53 is a very strong contender. The Samsung device delivered an all-around solid performance in our audio testing, with an especially pleasant sound in playback (the first time our engineers have noted decent bass rendition in a Galaxy series), and impressive performance at high volume. As a recording device, the A53 also delivered a strong all-around performance, although it wasn’t as adept in capturing high sound-pressure-level content.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.05.2022
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G struggled in almost all of our battery tests, resulting in a below-average performance when compared with our entire database. Poor overall efficiency, mainly due to its high discharge current and its low charge efficiency, as well as its weak charging performance (especially in the autonomy gain after a 5-minute charge) all contributed to the A53 5G’s weak score. Overall, autonomy is below average. Whether scrolling on social apps on the go or when streaming music and gaming in calibrated mode, the device just couldn’t hold up. When comparing the Galaxy A53 5G with other similarly priced devices in the High-end segment ($400–$599), it did not fare better. It has the lowest efficiency score for its segment, weighed down by the lowest discharge subscore, and it stands second to last in charging. As of this writing, it ranks last to date among the High-end devices we have tested.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.05.2022
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The lack of a dedicated tele lens means that images captured at tele zoom settings lack detail and show high levels of noise. This is especially true for long-range tele settings. On the plus side, exposure and color are generally good. For video, we tested the device at 1080p resolution and 30fps as video stabilization at 4K resolution is very ineffective. In video mode, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G records well-exposed video clips with vivid colors. Video stabilization is pretty good for the A53’s segment but unfortunately, an unstable autofocus means outdoor and low light videos are often not usable. When the autofocus does its job, the level of detail in 1080p mode is generally quite low. Dynamic range is limited as well and white balance often turns orange in low light. Video artifacts such as color quantization, ringing or ghosting are frequently visible.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.05.2022
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The A53 5G, released in March of this year, is a midrange offering that from the outside shares a similar style and size to the S21 Ultra. At this lower price point, however, it lacks the top-end chipset and some other flagship extras. On the audio front, it has stereo speakers. No audio jack is on offer, but the standard USB Type-C port can serve double duty, charging and delivering sound to headphones. With a global score of 73, the A53 5G surpassed last year’s A52 5G, which notched a 69. At this price point, the A53 is a very strong contender. The Samsung device delivered an all-around solid performance in our audio testing, with an especially pleasant sound in playback (the first time our engineers have noted decent bass rendition in a Galaxy series), and impressive performance at high volume. As a recording device, the A53 also delivered a strong all-around performance, although it wasn’t as adept in capturing high sound-pressure-level content.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.05.2022
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
An attractive phone with a good-looking screen and impressive cameras for the price, the Samsung Galaxy A53 offers good value for money overall; but with its slow charging and stuttery performance, it’s not for everyone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
An attractive phone with a good-looking screen and impressive cameras for the price, the Samsung Galaxy A53 offers good value for money overall; but with its slow charging and stuttery performance, it’s not for everyone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 is a brilliant mid-range phone, with an excellent display, top camera, and software support bested only by Apple. But it suffers from one massive flaw: poor performance. At this price a phone shouldn't be so slow, and it makes the A53 difficult to wholeheartedly recommend.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
I'd look at other options first. At $450, the Galaxy A53 offers a great display and snappy performance (typically) — plus legendary software support. Samsung's committed to four years of OS updates and five years of security patches. That's as good as you'll find on any Android phone right now, and it makes the Pixel 5a — which launched last year and is slated to stop getting updates in summer 2024 — look foolish. It's actually longer support than Google is offering even with its Pixel 6 series. But with inconsistent camera performance and year-over-year downgrades like the removal of the headphone jack and bundled charger, the A53 isn't the easy win the A52 was, even if it is 50 bucks cheaper. At the very least, wait and see what the Pixel 6a is all about — we could know as soon as Google I/O.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 is a brilliant mid-range phone, with an excellent display, top camera, and software support bested only by Apple. But it suffers from one massive flaw: poor performance. At this price a phone shouldn't be so slow, and it makes the A53 difficult to wholeheartedly recommend.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
I'd look at other options first. At $450, the Galaxy A53 offers a great display and snappy performance (typically) — plus legendary software support. Samsung's committed to four years of OS updates and five years of security patches. That's as good as you'll find on any Android phone right now, and it makes the Pixel 5a — which launched last year and is slated to stop getting updates in summer 2024 — look foolish. It's actually longer support than Google is offering even with its Pixel 6 series. But with inconsistent camera performance and year-over-year downgrades like the removal of the headphone jack and bundled charger, the A53 isn't the easy win the A52 was, even if it is 50 bucks cheaper. At the very least, wait and see what the Pixel 6a is all about — we could know as soon as Google I/O.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Cashify EN→DE
At a base price of Rs 34,499, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a fairly decent deal for the money. The smartphone has a comfortable grip and a decent design. Galaxy A53 5G is an excellent choice for those who don’t play a lot of games or do anything that requires a lot of processing power. A good primary camera, a great display, and a long-lasting battery round out the highlights of the phone. The choice made by Samsung to not include an adapter in the retail packaging may not sit well with all customers. Apart from that, the phone has best-in-class software support and an IP67 rating. All in all, it’s a mid-range phone that’s ready to take on anything.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.05.2022
Quelle: Cashify EN→DE
At a base price of Rs 34,499, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a fairly decent deal for the money. The smartphone has a comfortable grip and a decent design. Galaxy A53 5G is an excellent choice for those who don’t play a lot of games or do anything that requires a lot of processing power. A good primary camera, a great display, and a long-lasting battery round out the highlights of the phone. The choice made by Samsung to not include an adapter in the retail packaging may not sit well with all customers. Apart from that, the phone has best-in-class software support and an IP67 rating. All in all, it’s a mid-range phone that’s ready to take on anything.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.05.2022
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a pretty good buy at a starting price of Rs 34,499. The smartphone feels good to hold and looks decent. Although one may find it similar to its predecessor, Samsung Galaxy A52, it does offer significant updates when it comes to processor and battery. With impressive battery life, smooth functionality and premium design, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G delivers reliable performance. The smartphone is a good option for anyone who is looking to buy a premium smartphone in the Rs 35,000 segment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a pretty good buy at a starting price of Rs 34,499. The smartphone feels good to hold and looks decent. Although one may find it similar to its predecessor, Samsung Galaxy A52, it does offer significant updates when it comes to processor and battery. With impressive battery life, smooth functionality and premium design, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G delivers reliable performance. The smartphone is a good option for anyone who is looking to buy a premium smartphone in the Rs 35,000 segment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
Initially, I thought that the Galaxy A53 5G would be too small of an upgrade over the A52 5G, however, when I put all the improvements that Samsung has managed to muster up, I can't say that's the case. More battery life is always a good thing to have, and the A53 5G has a better one than the already good A52 5G from last year. The display and audio quality are an impressive wombo combo, adding a lot to the phone's value and making it a great device for enjoying lots of media. Downsides like the bad haptics can easily be overlooked, but when it comes to the A52's gaming performance, now that's a different story. Maybe with a few updates, Samsung will be able to utilize the Exynos 1280 in a better way, but as it stands right now, it is a bit of a letdown, and playing games is just okay. The camera system, on the other hand, seems to have benefited a lot from the new chip and both photos and video seem more polished in more ways than one, despite the camera-specific hardware remaining the same. Long story short, the Galaxy A53 5G is a solid all-rounder, even more than its predecessor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
Initially, I thought that the Galaxy A53 5G would be too small of an upgrade over the A52 5G, however, when I put all the improvements that Samsung has managed to muster up, I can't say that's the case. More battery life is always a good thing to have, and the A53 5G has a better one than the already good A52 5G from last year. The display and audio quality are an impressive wombo combo, adding a lot to the phone's value and making it a great device for enjoying lots of media. Downsides like the bad haptics can easily be overlooked, but when it comes to the A52's gaming performance, now that's a different story. Maybe with a few updates, Samsung will be able to utilize the Exynos 1280 in a better way, but as it stands right now, it is a bit of a letdown, and playing games is just okay. The camera system, on the other hand, seems to have benefited a lot from the new chip and both photos and video seem more polished in more ways than one, despite the camera-specific hardware remaining the same. Long story short, the Galaxy A53 5G is a solid all-rounder, even more than its predecessor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Zdnet.com EN→DE
When I saw the announcement for the Galaxy A53, I did not get that excited since I did not expect a sub-$450 Samsung phone was worth considering. After a few weeks of using the phone, I now question why I'm spending twice the price, and more, for the latest flagships. Granted, photo quality is better with the high-end flagships, but I'm just capturing and sharing photos with family and friends as an amateur. I have limited photo skills and am not going to win any photo contests, so I don't really care about having the ultimate shooter in my hand. While the display's high refresh rate is fantastic, I do see a bit of lag in content appearing on the display and when switching apps from time to time. It really only bothers me if I jump over to a flagship and can see the differences, but for the low $450 price, it is clearly an acceptable compromise and one that the majority of owners are unlikely to notice. One function that bothers me on my iPhone 13 Pro Max is that I have to stand 20 feet away from someone to get a good portrait shot outside.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Zdnet.com EN→DE
When I saw the announcement for the Galaxy A53, I did not get that excited since I did not expect a sub-$450 Samsung phone was worth considering. After a few weeks of using the phone, I now question why I'm spending twice the price, and more, for the latest flagships. Granted, photo quality is better with the high-end flagships, but I'm just capturing and sharing photos with family and friends as an amateur. I have limited photo skills and am not going to win any photo contests, so I don't really care about having the ultimate shooter in my hand. While the display's high refresh rate is fantastic, I do see a bit of lag in content appearing on the display and when switching apps from time to time. It really only bothers me if I jump over to a flagship and can see the differences, but for the low $450 price, it is clearly an acceptable compromise and one that the majority of owners are unlikely to notice. One function that bothers me on my iPhone 13 Pro Max is that I have to stand 20 feet away from someone to get a good portrait shot outside.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G is a remarkably well-rounded rival to this year’s high-priced flagships. If your sights are set on the Galaxy S22 but you don’t have the funds to buy one, then the A53 5G is every bit the next best thing. It simply brings so much to the table that I’d be mad not to give the Galaxy A53 5G a Best Buy award. It’s not perfect but, at this price, nothing ever is and, besides, it gets pretty darn close.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G is a remarkably well-rounded rival to this year’s high-priced flagships. If your sights are set on the Galaxy S22 but you don’t have the funds to buy one, then the A53 5G is every bit the next best thing. It simply brings so much to the table that I’d be mad not to give the Galaxy A53 5G a Best Buy award. It’s not perfect but, at this price, nothing ever is and, besides, it gets pretty darn close.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Android Headlines EN→DE
In a lot of ways, the Galaxy A53 5G is the next best thing if you can’t afford a Galaxy S phone. It’s a mid-ranger through and through, but it punches above its weight in some areas. You won’t find many phones with as good of a media consumption experience as this phone’s with its beautiful display and amazing speakers.The camera isn’t flagship tier, but it gets the job done with good flair. You’ll be able to take some nice pictures that will look good on social media. The only letdown in my experience has been the performance. This phone is going to lag at points in your usage, and you won’t be able to play the most graphics-intensive games. At the end of the day, I recommend picking up this phone if you enjoy consuming content and you want the latest and greatest software from Samsung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Headlines EN→DE
In a lot of ways, the Galaxy A53 5G is the next best thing if you can’t afford a Galaxy S phone. It’s a mid-ranger through and through, but it punches above its weight in some areas. You won’t find many phones with as good of a media consumption experience as this phone’s with its beautiful display and amazing speakers.The camera isn’t flagship tier, but it gets the job done with good flair. You’ll be able to take some nice pictures that will look good on social media. The only letdown in my experience has been the performance. This phone is going to lag at points in your usage, and you won’t be able to play the most graphics-intensive games. At the end of the day, I recommend picking up this phone if you enjoy consuming content and you want the latest and greatest software from Samsung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Pocket Lint EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G hits all the important spec points, with a great design and display. There's no shortage of mid-range phones that provide a similar experience for less - and this is no big jump from the A52 - but there are still some very good reasons to choose the A53.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.04.2022
Quelle: Pocket Lint EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G hits all the important spec points, with a great design and display. There's no shortage of mid-range phones that provide a similar experience for less - and this is no big jump from the A52 - but there are still some very good reasons to choose the A53.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.04.2022
Quelle: T3 EN→DE
If you’re totally snap-happy and you want an affordable new phone, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G will be a great choice. It’s one of the best cheap phones for point-and-shoot photography, you'll be hard-pushed to find any others with such an accomplished camera system below $500 / £400. Granted there are some downsides. The most damning is its performance, it lacks power which will be frustrating for those who spend a lot of time flicking through their phone. You might also struggle with the slow charge times and the lack of wireless charging. But if those are things you can look past then it will be worth it, especially if you already own other Samsung Galaxy devices. To sum things up, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has a great screen, a killer camera, easy-to-use software, incredible battery life and it’s all packed into an up-to-date phone that looks the part as well. It’d be hard not to recommend to anyone on a budget. The only reason I would tell you not to buy this is if you already own the A52 because it’s not different enough to justify the upgrade.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: T3 EN→DE
If you’re totally snap-happy and you want an affordable new phone, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G will be a great choice. It’s one of the best cheap phones for point-and-shoot photography, you'll be hard-pushed to find any others with such an accomplished camera system below $500 / £400. Granted there are some downsides. The most damning is its performance, it lacks power which will be frustrating for those who spend a lot of time flicking through their phone. You might also struggle with the slow charge times and the lack of wireless charging. But if those are things you can look past then it will be worth it, especially if you already own other Samsung Galaxy devices. To sum things up, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has a great screen, a killer camera, easy-to-use software, incredible battery life and it’s all packed into an up-to-date phone that looks the part as well. It’d be hard not to recommend to anyone on a budget. The only reason I would tell you not to buy this is if you already own the A52 because it’s not different enough to justify the upgrade.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Engadget EN→DE
At $450, the A53 costs $50 less than the A52 5G. That may seem like a bonus, but Samsung doesn’t ship the phone with a wall charger anymore and it hasn’t added wireless charging. The company’s 25W power adapter costs an extra $20. In addition to the Galaxy Buds Live promotion I mentioned earlier, the company is currently offering up to $100 off the A53 if you trade in your existing device. Had Samsung done more to future-proof the A53, it would be easier for me to recommend. But with a middling chipset and a camera that feels stuck in the past, you’re better off spending your money on a phone that you’ll be happy with for years to come.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65%
Quelle: Engadget
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.04.2022
Quelle: Engadget EN→DE
At $450, the A53 costs $50 less than the A52 5G. That may seem like a bonus, but Samsung doesn’t ship the phone with a wall charger anymore and it hasn’t added wireless charging. The company’s 25W power adapter costs an extra $20. In addition to the Galaxy Buds Live promotion I mentioned earlier, the company is currently offering up to $100 off the A53 if you trade in your existing device. Had Samsung done more to future-proof the A53, it would be easier for me to recommend. But with a middling chipset and a camera that feels stuck in the past, you’re better off spending your money on a phone that you’ll be happy with for years to come.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65%
Quelle: Engadget
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.04.2022
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 smartphone comes with 5G support at an expected price of $380 (Rs 28,000 in India) approx. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G carries a 6.5 inches Super AMOLED display panel with a 120Hz refresh rate support. This FHD screen is protected by the Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection. For software, you get the latest Android 12 OS with One UI 4.1 user interface. Besides this, the handset provides 4GB/6GB/8GB RAM support with 128GB/256GB internal storage with a microSDXC card slot. As far as the cameras are concerned, the Galaxy A53 equips a rear Quad camera setup featuring a 64MP primary camera, 12MP ultrawide, 5MP macro, and 5MP depth lens. You get various modes and filters in the camera module. Apart from this, you will also receive a 32MP selfie camera lens at the front, and with this setup, you can record 4K videos at 30fps. Furthermore, the phone carries a 5nm Exynos 1280 chipset that reaches up to a 2.4GHz clocking speed. The smartphone has provided a Li-Po 5000 mAh battery with a 25W fast charging support.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.04.2022
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 smartphone comes with 5G support at an expected price of $380 (Rs 28,000 in India) approx. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G carries a 6.5 inches Super AMOLED display panel with a 120Hz refresh rate support. This FHD screen is protected by the Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection. For software, you get the latest Android 12 OS with One UI 4.1 user interface. Besides this, the handset provides 4GB/6GB/8GB RAM support with 128GB/256GB internal storage with a microSDXC card slot. As far as the cameras are concerned, the Galaxy A53 equips a rear Quad camera setup featuring a 64MP primary camera, 12MP ultrawide, 5MP macro, and 5MP depth lens. You get various modes and filters in the camera module. Apart from this, you will also receive a 32MP selfie camera lens at the front, and with this setup, you can record 4K videos at 30fps. Furthermore, the phone carries a 5nm Exynos 1280 chipset that reaches up to a 2.4GHz clocking speed. The smartphone has provided a Li-Po 5000 mAh battery with a 25W fast charging support.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.04.2022
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G is at an odd spot in the phone market. There simply aren't a lot of $450 phones in the US, because most Americans either opt to pay for a high-end model on a monthly payment plan, or purchase a cheaper one upfront. At the $450 price point, the Google Pixel 5a 5G dominates, and the A53 doesn't have much new to bring to the conversation. We like its premium design, colorful screen, and flexible imaging options, but if you're on a payment plan, it's worth stepping up to more expensive Android phones such as the Galaxy S21 FE or the Pixel 6. And although the upcoming OnePlus Nord N20 and the Galaxy A33 probably won’t include specs that match the A53, they might be inexpensive enough that you can avoid a long-term contract with your carrier. Finally, despite its smaller screen and lack of a camera night mode, Apple’s affordable iPhone SE is also worth your attention thanks to its impressive hardware performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 is a great phone for $449. It outperforms the Pixel 5a in benchmarks and even goes a decent while on a charge. The 120Hz display is really nice, especially at this price. I wish it was an adaptive refresh rate, but not even the more expensive Galaxy S21 FE sports one of those. The looming threat on the horizon is the Pixel 6a, which might be right around the corner. Rumors say that handset will use the same Tensor chip that’s in the Pixel 6. If true, the 6a is going to be a force to be reckoned with, and the Galaxy A53 may not be able to weather that storm. We’ll have to see. But right now, I’m confident in saying that the Galaxy A53 is the best cheap Android phone. The iPhone SE (2022) is more powerful, but the A53 has the bigger and brighter display (plus a higher refresh rate). The ultrawide camera and dedicated night mode also go a long way to making the case for the Galaxy A53.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G doesn’t reinvent the wheel, but it doesn’t have to. Instead, Samsung refined the already impressive Galaxy A52 5G and lowered its asking price by $50. The lower price ends up being the cherry on top because the overall package is one of the most impressive you’ll find for under $500. If you already have a Galaxy A52 5G, there’s not enough new here to consider an upgrade, but if you’ve been looking for a reasonably priced way to enter the Samsung ecosystem, the Galaxy A53 5G is an excellent gateway. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is an excellent indicator of where the budget phone market is headed. It offers a well-rounded experience that should suit the needs of most users and a price tag that won’t make your wallet hurt too badly. Add in Samsung’s excellent update commitment, and you’ve got an affordable device that’ll stay current long after others have retired.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 90% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
The Galaxy A series has been Samsung's best-selling line for quite some time now. That's no coincidence since the "A family" went through a transformative period a while back and has been laser-focused on consistently delivering great value across the midrange and budget segments. Unfortunately, that focus seems to be blurring a bit lately. We didn't particularly like the Galaxy A13, which we reviewed not long ago, and now the Galaxy A53 5G underdelivered as well. Taking all of this into account, we just can't bring ourselves to outright recommend anybody go out and deliberately seek an A53s 5G. Again, at the risk of repeating ourselves, it's a solid and well-rounded Samsung that won't disappoint in any major way if you happen to get one through a great deal, on contract or as a company unit. If it's your money on the line, though, you are much better off getting last year's Galaxy A52s 5G or perhaps the Galaxy S20 FE 5G instead.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G is at an odd spot in the phone market. There simply aren't a lot of $450 phones in the US, because most Americans either opt to pay for a high-end model on a monthly payment plan, or purchase a cheaper one upfront. At the $450 price point, the Google Pixel 5a 5G dominates, and the A53 doesn't have much new to bring to the conversation. We like its premium design, colorful screen, and flexible imaging options, but if you're on a payment plan, it's worth stepping up to more expensive Android phones such as the Galaxy S21 FE or the Pixel 6. And although the upcoming OnePlus Nord N20 and the Galaxy A33 probably won’t include specs that match the A53, they might be inexpensive enough that you can avoid a long-term contract with your carrier. Finally, despite its smaller screen and lack of a camera night mode, Apple’s affordable iPhone SE is also worth your attention thanks to its impressive hardware performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 is a great phone for $449. It outperforms the Pixel 5a in benchmarks and even goes a decent while on a charge. The 120Hz display is really nice, especially at this price. I wish it was an adaptive refresh rate, but not even the more expensive Galaxy S21 FE sports one of those. The looming threat on the horizon is the Pixel 6a, which might be right around the corner. Rumors say that handset will use the same Tensor chip that’s in the Pixel 6. If true, the 6a is going to be a force to be reckoned with, and the Galaxy A53 may not be able to weather that storm. We’ll have to see. But right now, I’m confident in saying that the Galaxy A53 is the best cheap Android phone. The iPhone SE (2022) is more powerful, but the A53 has the bigger and brighter display (plus a higher refresh rate). The ultrawide camera and dedicated night mode also go a long way to making the case for the Galaxy A53.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G doesn’t reinvent the wheel, but it doesn’t have to. Instead, Samsung refined the already impressive Galaxy A52 5G and lowered its asking price by $50. The lower price ends up being the cherry on top because the overall package is one of the most impressive you’ll find for under $500. If you already have a Galaxy A52 5G, there’s not enough new here to consider an upgrade, but if you’ve been looking for a reasonably priced way to enter the Samsung ecosystem, the Galaxy A53 5G is an excellent gateway. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is an excellent indicator of where the budget phone market is headed. It offers a well-rounded experience that should suit the needs of most users and a price tag that won’t make your wallet hurt too badly. Add in Samsung’s excellent update commitment, and you’ve got an affordable device that’ll stay current long after others have retired.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 90% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
The Galaxy A series has been Samsung's best-selling line for quite some time now. That's no coincidence since the "A family" went through a transformative period a while back and has been laser-focused on consistently delivering great value across the midrange and budget segments. Unfortunately, that focus seems to be blurring a bit lately. We didn't particularly like the Galaxy A13, which we reviewed not long ago, and now the Galaxy A53 5G underdelivered as well. Taking all of this into account, we just can't bring ourselves to outright recommend anybody go out and deliberately seek an A53s 5G. Again, at the risk of repeating ourselves, it's a solid and well-rounded Samsung that won't disappoint in any major way if you happen to get one through a great deal, on contract or as a company unit. If it's your money on the line, though, you are much better off getting last year's Galaxy A52s 5G or perhaps the Galaxy S20 FE 5G instead.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has great cameras, battery life and a good display. It is supposed to be an all-rounder but as compared to completion it is found wanting. We are of the opinion iQOO 9 SE has an edge over A53 5G in terms of value for money tag. The mid-range segment is flooded with a bunch of options from various OEMs and currently, we feel that the bar has been set by the iQOO 9 SE at Rs 33,990. For Rs 34,999, Samsung is now offering you the 6/128 model of its newest Galaxy A53 5G and at Rs 35,999, you can get the top-of-the-line 8/128 model. However, does it seem worth in front of competitors such as Realme GT Neo 2, iQOO 9 SE, etc? Let’s take a look.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Leistung: 65% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 65%
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has great cameras, battery life and a good display. It is supposed to be an all-rounder but as compared to completion it is found wanting. We are of the opinion iQOO 9 SE has an edge over A53 5G in terms of value for money tag. The mid-range segment is flooded with a bunch of options from various OEMs and currently, we feel that the bar has been set by the iQOO 9 SE at Rs 33,990. For Rs 34,999, Samsung is now offering you the 6/128 model of its newest Galaxy A53 5G and at Rs 35,999, you can get the top-of-the-line 8/128 model. However, does it seem worth in front of competitors such as Realme GT Neo 2, iQOO 9 SE, etc? Let’s take a look.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Leistung: 65% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 65%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a capable premium smartphone but falls short compared in terms of raw performance. This is mainly due to the new SoC, which seems as though it would be a good enough fit for the budget Galaxy M33 5G (Rs. 18,999), but not for a phone that costs Rs. 35,000. Daylight camera performance is quite good, and this is the only phone we've reviewed in this segment with an IP67 rating. Unfortunately for the Galaxy A53 5G, the Galaxy A52s 5G (Review), its predecessor, offers better gaming performance, has a headphone jack, and comes with a charger in the box. It also costs a bit less (around Rs. 32,499) which makes it the better buy. As for competition from other manufacturers, the iQoo 9 SE (starting at Rs. 33,990) is the Galaxy A53 5G's biggest potential competitor. We are yet to review this phone, but it has a better Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC and you get a 66W charger in the box. The base variant also has 8GB of RAM, so even just going by specifications, it poses a threat.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a capable premium smartphone but falls short compared in terms of raw performance. This is mainly due to the new SoC, which seems as though it would be a good enough fit for the budget Galaxy M33 5G (Rs. 18,999), but not for a phone that costs Rs. 35,000. Daylight camera performance is quite good, and this is the only phone we've reviewed in this segment with an IP67 rating. Unfortunately for the Galaxy A53 5G, the Galaxy A52s 5G (Review), its predecessor, offers better gaming performance, has a headphone jack, and comes with a charger in the box. It also costs a bit less (around Rs. 32,499) which makes it the better buy. As for competition from other manufacturers, the iQoo 9 SE (starting at Rs. 33,990) is the Galaxy A53 5G's biggest potential competitor. We are yet to review this phone, but it has a better Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC and you get a 66W charger in the box. The base variant also has 8GB of RAM, so even just going by specifications, it poses a threat.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
I'd look at other options first. At $450, the Galaxy A53 offers a great display and snappy performance (typically) — plus legendary software support. Samsung's committed to four years of OS updates and five years of security patches. That's as good as you'll find on any Android phone right now, and it makes the Pixel 5a — which launched last year and is slated to stop getting updates in summer 2024 — look foolish. It's actually longer support than Google is offering even with its Pixel 6 series. But with inconsistent camera performance and year-over-year downgrades like the removal of the headphone jack and bundled charger, the A53 isn't the easy win the A52 was, even if it is 50 bucks cheaper. At the very least, wait and see what the Pixel 6a is all about — we could know as soon as Google I/O.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
I'd look at other options first. At $450, the Galaxy A53 offers a great display and snappy performance (typically) — plus legendary software support. Samsung's committed to four years of OS updates and five years of security patches. That's as good as you'll find on any Android phone right now, and it makes the Pixel 5a — which launched last year and is slated to stop getting updates in summer 2024 — look foolish. It's actually longer support than Google is offering even with its Pixel 6 series. But with inconsistent camera performance and year-over-year downgrades like the removal of the headphone jack and bundled charger, the A53 isn't the easy win the A52 was, even if it is 50 bucks cheaper. At the very least, wait and see what the Pixel 6a is all about — we could know as soon as Google I/O.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
Overall, the Galaxy A53 5G has a lot to offer for the price, with the right balance of features for most people. If you just want a phone for basic tasks like reading the news, taking casual photos of your pets for Instagram and video chatting over Zoom, the Galaxy A53 5G will do just fine.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.04.2022
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
The $449 Pixel 5A with 5G also gives Samsung a healthy run for its money. That phone has a nearly borderless screen, an ultrawide camera, night mode photography, a headphone jack and a Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G processor with solid performance. Plus, Google typically brings exclusive features to its own Pixel devices before launching them for other Android phones. But it's missing some other perks you'd get with the Galaxy A53 5G, like an in-screen fingerprint scanner (the Pixel's sensor is on the back), a 120Hz refresh rate for its display, expandable storage and an extra year of Android OS upgrades. Overall, the Galaxy A53 5G has a lot to offer for the price, with the right balance of features for most people. If you just want a phone for basic tasks like reading the news, taking casual photos of your pets for Instagram and video chatting over Zoom, the Galaxy A53 5G will do just fine.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
Overall, the Galaxy A53 5G has a lot to offer for the price, with the right balance of features for most people. If you just want a phone for basic tasks like reading the news, taking casual photos of your pets for Instagram and video chatting over Zoom, the Galaxy A53 5G will do just fine.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.04.2022
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
The $449 Pixel 5A with 5G also gives Samsung a healthy run for its money. That phone has a nearly borderless screen, an ultrawide camera, night mode photography, a headphone jack and a Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G processor with solid performance. Plus, Google typically brings exclusive features to its own Pixel devices before launching them for other Android phones. But it's missing some other perks you'd get with the Galaxy A53 5G, like an in-screen fingerprint scanner (the Pixel's sensor is on the back), a 120Hz refresh rate for its display, expandable storage and an extra year of Android OS upgrades. Overall, the Galaxy A53 5G has a lot to offer for the price, with the right balance of features for most people. If you just want a phone for basic tasks like reading the news, taking casual photos of your pets for Instagram and video chatting over Zoom, the Galaxy A53 5G will do just fine.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G is an easy pick if you live in the US and you’re looking to spend less than $500 on an Android phone. The Google Pixel 5A is basically the phone’s only competition, but it’s likely to be replaced soon and has a shorter shelf life at this point with only a couple more OS updates headed to it. You’d get a better camera and better software without all of the Samsung duplicates, but it’s not sold through any carriers if you’re looking to subsidize it with your wireless plan. Aside from waiting for the Google Pixel 6A, the other option would be to spend more and go for the Pixel 6. Google seems to have addressed some early bugs with Android 12 security patches, and for $599, it’s a fantastic device with an excellent camera and lovely software. But it’s significantly more expensive — an extra $150. If you’re not picky about getting the very best image quality and you like (or at least don’t mind) Samsung’s version of Android 12, then there really isn’t a compelling case for spending the extra money.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G is an easy pick if you live in the US and you’re looking to spend less than $500 on an Android phone. The Google Pixel 5A is basically the phone’s only competition, but it’s likely to be replaced soon and has a shorter shelf life at this point with only a couple more OS updates headed to it. You’d get a better camera and better software without all of the Samsung duplicates, but it’s not sold through any carriers if you’re looking to subsidize it with your wireless plan. Aside from waiting for the Google Pixel 6A, the other option would be to spend more and go for the Pixel 6. Google seems to have addressed some early bugs with Android 12 security patches, and for $599, it’s a fantastic device with an excellent camera and lovely software. But it’s significantly more expensive — an extra $150. If you’re not picky about getting the very best image quality and you like (or at least don’t mind) Samsung’s version of Android 12, then there really isn’t a compelling case for spending the extra money.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Think Digit EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 is everything we expect of a Samsung mid-range phone. The experience is quite pacifying, mostly thanks to the palatable software and good-quality display, but it’s also let down by a mediocre chipset. If you are into gaming, phones like the OnePlus 9R, OnePlus Nord 2, iQOO 9 SE or perhaps even Galaxy A52s should offer better value. The Galaxy A53 is an allrounder with a lot to look forward to. It has an appealing design, offers decent camera performance for the price, and assures a reliable battery backup. At the same time, the mid-range Exynos chip hampers the experience. The lack of a charging adaptor in the box and slow charging speeds are other peeve points.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 67% Preis: 67% Leistung: 64% Gehäuse: 65%
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
So, at the end of the day, the Galaxy A53 5G is still a solid phone to get today. It’s a great all-rounder mid-range smartphone that has good performance for day-to-day use with some gaming on the side, good battery life, excellent software – and excellent software support as well. The price though, I am still rather salty at that extreme price hike over the Galaxy A52. At RM1,849 – I just think it’s rather steep. If you have that budget to spend for a phone like this, then go on ahead. The Galaxy A53 5G is a solid phone overall. However, if you’re looking for an even better deal, then maybe take a look at the Galaxy A52s 5G from late last year. It doesn’t have that extensive software support, but you can get it for less than RM1,500 through retailers now. That is a much better deal, in my opinion.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2022
Quelle: Think Digit EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 is everything we expect of a Samsung mid-range phone. The experience is quite pacifying, mostly thanks to the palatable software and good-quality display, but it’s also let down by a mediocre chipset. If you are into gaming, phones like the OnePlus 9R, OnePlus Nord 2, iQOO 9 SE or perhaps even Galaxy A52s should offer better value. The Galaxy A53 is an allrounder with a lot to look forward to. It has an appealing design, offers decent camera performance for the price, and assures a reliable battery backup. At the same time, the mid-range Exynos chip hampers the experience. The lack of a charging adaptor in the box and slow charging speeds are other peeve points.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 67% Preis: 67% Leistung: 64% Gehäuse: 65%
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
So, at the end of the day, the Galaxy A53 5G is still a solid phone to get today. It’s a great all-rounder mid-range smartphone that has good performance for day-to-day use with some gaming on the side, good battery life, excellent software – and excellent software support as well. The price though, I am still rather salty at that extreme price hike over the Galaxy A52. At RM1,849 – I just think it’s rather steep. If you have that budget to spend for a phone like this, then go on ahead. The Galaxy A53 5G is a solid phone overall. However, if you’re looking for an even better deal, then maybe take a look at the Galaxy A52s 5G from late last year. It doesn’t have that extensive software support, but you can get it for less than RM1,500 through retailers now. That is a much better deal, in my opinion.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2022
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
For many, the Galaxy A53 5G, which starts at Rs 34,499, will be sufficient for their needs. It’s not the best smartphone made by Samsung, but the idea of having a mid-range phone with premium features makes it a lot more capable than rivals. Yes, it misses on certain things, but is just as capable as Samsung’s flagship phones in most regards. If you are the sort of person who prefers a big screen and needs great battery life coupled with fast performance, then look no further.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
For many, the Galaxy A53 5G, which starts at Rs 34,499, will be sufficient for their needs. It’s not the best smartphone made by Samsung, but the idea of having a mid-range phone with premium features makes it a lot more capable than rivals. Yes, it misses on certain things, but is just as capable as Samsung’s flagship phones in most regards. If you are the sort of person who prefers a big screen and needs great battery life coupled with fast performance, then look no further.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G is faster than its predecessor, has a larger battery, takes better photos, and will get more software updates than any other mid-range phone. It doesn't have a 3.5mm jack or a charger in the box, but the upside is that it costs $450 — $50 less than the A52. This is the mid-range phone to beat right now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.03.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Mobygyaan EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G equips a stunning 120 Hz Super AMOLED display, packs a 5nm Exynos 1280 octa-core processor that performs well, the camera performance is impressive, supports hardware OIS, and comes with an IP67 water-resistant design. Other features include Android 12 out-of-the-box, stereo speakers, 5G support, and its sleek Ambient Edge design. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is an overall reasonable option for those who are looking for a smartphone (especially non-Chinese) with such features in the price range of ₹30,000 to ₹35,000. You can grab exciting discounts of flat ₹3,000 off on ICICI Credit Cards on pre-orders as well as up to ₹2,000 off via the Samsung Shop App.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.03.2022
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The cameras on the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G remain seemingly unchanged over what you get with the Galaxy A52s 5G. There's a 64-megapixel primary camera with optical stabilisation (OIS), a 12-megapixel ultra-wide-angle camera with a 123-degree field of view, a 5-megapixel macro camera, and a 5-megapixel depth camera. A 32-megapixel camera on the front takes care of selfies. One of the main changes with the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G over its predecessor is Samsung's switch to an Exynos SoC. This smartphone uses a new Exynos 1280 SoC which is also expected to show up in other Samsung smartphones this year. The previous Samsung Galaxy A52 and Galaxy A52s 5G had Qualcomm-powered SoCs, so it will be interesting to see how the Exynos one compares. This will also be one of the factors that decides the Galaxy A53 5G's overall value, keeping in mind its premium price tag. So, stay tuned for our full review, which will be out soon.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 28.03.2022
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
Will Samsung fix that with software updates? Can Samsung fix that with software updates? I don’t know, but as it stands, I don’t think I can recommend buying the Galaxy A53 5G if a phone that performs well in day-to-day use is what you’re looking for. The Galaxy A52s is the better choice in that case, even if it’s a little old and won’t get four years of OS upgrades (it won’t go past Android 14 vs Android 16 on the A53). But if you do want to take the plunge, the Galaxy A53 5G does have a lot going for it. The display’s great, the stereo speakers are nice, battery life is long-lasting, the cameras take great pictures in all sorts of conditions, and while the design uses too much plastic, the A53 is still a looker and is certified for excellent water and dust resistance. And again, a promise of updates till Android 16? That’s just unbeatable and makes the Galaxy A53 5G stand out from the crowd (a crowd that’s got both Samsung and non-Samsung phones in it). I just hope the performance issues are fixed soon, because everything else about this phone is impressive for the asking price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.03.2022
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G is faster than its predecessor, has a larger battery, takes better photos, and will get more software updates than any other mid-range phone. It doesn't have a 3.5mm jack or a charger in the box, but the upside is that it costs $450 — $50 less than the A52. This is the mid-range phone to beat right now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.03.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Mobygyaan EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G equips a stunning 120 Hz Super AMOLED display, packs a 5nm Exynos 1280 octa-core processor that performs well, the camera performance is impressive, supports hardware OIS, and comes with an IP67 water-resistant design. Other features include Android 12 out-of-the-box, stereo speakers, 5G support, and its sleek Ambient Edge design. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is an overall reasonable option for those who are looking for a smartphone (especially non-Chinese) with such features in the price range of ₹30,000 to ₹35,000. You can grab exciting discounts of flat ₹3,000 off on ICICI Credit Cards on pre-orders as well as up to ₹2,000 off via the Samsung Shop App.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.03.2022
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The cameras on the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G remain seemingly unchanged over what you get with the Galaxy A52s 5G. There's a 64-megapixel primary camera with optical stabilisation (OIS), a 12-megapixel ultra-wide-angle camera with a 123-degree field of view, a 5-megapixel macro camera, and a 5-megapixel depth camera. A 32-megapixel camera on the front takes care of selfies. One of the main changes with the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G over its predecessor is Samsung's switch to an Exynos SoC. This smartphone uses a new Exynos 1280 SoC which is also expected to show up in other Samsung smartphones this year. The previous Samsung Galaxy A52 and Galaxy A52s 5G had Qualcomm-powered SoCs, so it will be interesting to see how the Exynos one compares. This will also be one of the factors that decides the Galaxy A53 5G's overall value, keeping in mind its premium price tag. So, stay tuned for our full review, which will be out soon.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 28.03.2022
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
Will Samsung fix that with software updates? Can Samsung fix that with software updates? I don’t know, but as it stands, I don’t think I can recommend buying the Galaxy A53 5G if a phone that performs well in day-to-day use is what you’re looking for. The Galaxy A52s is the better choice in that case, even if it’s a little old and won’t get four years of OS upgrades (it won’t go past Android 14 vs Android 16 on the A53). But if you do want to take the plunge, the Galaxy A53 5G does have a lot going for it. The display’s great, the stereo speakers are nice, battery life is long-lasting, the cameras take great pictures in all sorts of conditions, and while the design uses too much plastic, the A53 is still a looker and is certified for excellent water and dust resistance. And again, a promise of updates till Android 16? That’s just unbeatable and makes the Galaxy A53 5G stand out from the crowd (a crowd that’s got both Samsung and non-Samsung phones in it). I just hope the performance issues are fixed soon, because everything else about this phone is impressive for the asking price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.03.2022
Quelle: TechTablets
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2022
Quelle: TechTablets
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2022
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G retails for Rs 34,499 in India and for the price, brings a handful of compelling features to the table. For one, the phone offers a capable set of cameras that can click delightful pictures come night or day. The unit performs well too, and the smartphone’s beefy cell can outlast a user’s longest binge sessions as well. With that said, everything the Galaxy A53 5G can do, the Galaxy A52s 5G does better. What’s more, the market is flush with high-performance devices that’ll be better suited to those who tend to game a lot on their phone as well. Be that as it may, buyers looking for a good-looking mid-ranger that will run the latest version of Android for years to come can bank on the Galaxy A53 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.03.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G retails for Rs 34,499 in India and for the price, brings a handful of compelling features to the table. For one, the phone offers a capable set of cameras that can click delightful pictures come night or day. The unit performs well too, and the smartphone’s beefy cell can outlast a user’s longest binge sessions as well. With that said, everything the Galaxy A53 5G can do, the Galaxy A52s 5G does better. What’s more, the market is flush with high-performance devices that’ll be better suited to those who tend to game a lot on their phone as well. Be that as it may, buyers looking for a good-looking mid-ranger that will run the latest version of Android for years to come can bank on the Galaxy A53 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.03.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 appears to be a worthy successor to its predecessor. We’ve been impressed by it during the course of our Galaxy A53 hands-on and look forward to testing it in more detail for the full review. Samsung has focused on the quality of improvements this time around, not the quantity. The winning formula that it set with the Galaxy A52 has clearly been perfected. It does appear that the company may have yet another winner on its hands.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.03.2022
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 appears to be a worthy successor to its predecessor. We’ve been impressed by it during the course of our Galaxy A53 hands-on and look forward to testing it in more detail for the full review. Samsung has focused on the quality of improvements this time around, not the quantity. The winning formula that it set with the Galaxy A52 has clearly been perfected. It does appear that the company may have yet another winner on its hands.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.03.2022
Quelle: The Tech Chap
First impressions of the 2022 Samsung Galaxy A53 (& Galaxy A33) - for £399 it's cheaper than the new iPhone SE... could it be the new mid-range killer!?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.03.2022
Quelle: The Tech Chap
First impressions of the 2022 Samsung Galaxy A53 (& Galaxy A33) - for £399 it's cheaper than the new iPhone SE... could it be the new mid-range killer!?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.03.2022
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 is a feature-packed, mid-range phone which has enough about it to compete in an incredibly crowded section of the market. It may not quite have the best bang-for-buck offering, but Samsung's A series continues to grow in popularity and the A53 is a solid new chapter in the story.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.03.2022
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 is a feature-packed, mid-range phone which has enough about it to compete in an incredibly crowded section of the market. It may not quite have the best bang-for-buck offering, but Samsung's A series continues to grow in popularity and the A53 is a solid new chapter in the story.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.03.2022
Quelle: Engadget
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: 9to5google
Sporting similar designs and internals, just what is the difference between the Galaxy A33 5G and Galaxy A53 5G? After spending some time with the duo we have a good idea of the strengths of each handset and which might be the better choice.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
For the impressive price, the Galaxy A53 5G ticks a lot of boxes. The addition of an adaptive refresh rate and OIS over its predecessor are two welcome features, while the chipset should offer nippy performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G is set to be a well-rounded rival to this year’s high-priced flagships. If your sights are set on the Galaxy S22 but you don’t have the funds required to buy one, then there’s a good chance that this year’s A53 5G will be the next best thing. Of course, we’ll find out soon when we receive a handset for review. In the meantime, the Galaxy A53 5G is available from 1 April in the UK at a SIM-free price of £399.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
Samsung is up for an interesting battle in the mid-range segment in the Philippines with the Galaxy A53. Save for a bump in battery capacity (at the expense of the headphone jack) and a new Exynos processor, Samsung chose to go for the tried-and-tested formula of the Galaxy A52/52S for its latest premium mid-range phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
At the end of the day, the Galaxy A53 5G is seemingly an incremental improvement over the A52 5G. Despite that, it does manage to bring something new to the table like a significantly better processor, better stereo speakers, and a slightly larger battery. Make sure you come back, to check out our full detailed review of the Galaxy A53 5G, where we will give you a more in-depth look inside what's new and better, compared to the previous models and competitors.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Pocket Lint EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G follows on from a phone that was not just a great seller for Samsung, but a phone we also rated highly. There are some incremental upgrades here which we still have to explore in our full review, but first impressions are good. There's a great design - with waterproofing adding a premium touch - fronted by a high-quality display. New core hardware promises more power, while the main camera should be capable enough. A bigger battery might just seal the deal and deliver a great experience for those who want something slightly more affordable. We will deliver a full and updated verdict on the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G as soon as we can.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Stuff TV EN→DE
At £379 for the A33 5G and £399 for the A53 5G, we’re impressed both phones cram in so much, and overjoyed we’re not seeing piddly 64GB storage capacities and mediocre screens in midrange Samsung phones anymore. The Galaxy A53 5G, in particular, seems perfect for someone who wants Galaxy S22 experiences without the flagship price. Meanwhile, the A33 5G loses a little more screen to that notch, scales back the refresh rate and reduces the megapixels. That said, pretty much everything else is identical across both phones, from the in-display fingerprint scanners to the IP67 water and dust resistance, through to massive batteries and capable 5nm processors. Expected to launch for pre-order right now, and be available for purchase either at the end of March or the beginning of April 2022, if you’re a Samsung fan in need of a cost-effective upgrade, both these phones should be blipping your radar.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Engadget
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: 9to5google
Sporting similar designs and internals, just what is the difference between the Galaxy A33 5G and Galaxy A53 5G? After spending some time with the duo we have a good idea of the strengths of each handset and which might be the better choice.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
For the impressive price, the Galaxy A53 5G ticks a lot of boxes. The addition of an adaptive refresh rate and OIS over its predecessor are two welcome features, while the chipset should offer nippy performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The Galaxy A53 5G is set to be a well-rounded rival to this year’s high-priced flagships. If your sights are set on the Galaxy S22 but you don’t have the funds required to buy one, then there’s a good chance that this year’s A53 5G will be the next best thing. Of course, we’ll find out soon when we receive a handset for review. In the meantime, the Galaxy A53 5G is available from 1 April in the UK at a SIM-free price of £399.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
Samsung is up for an interesting battle in the mid-range segment in the Philippines with the Galaxy A53. Save for a bump in battery capacity (at the expense of the headphone jack) and a new Exynos processor, Samsung chose to go for the tried-and-tested formula of the Galaxy A52/52S for its latest premium mid-range phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
At the end of the day, the Galaxy A53 5G is seemingly an incremental improvement over the A52 5G. Despite that, it does manage to bring something new to the table like a significantly better processor, better stereo speakers, and a slightly larger battery. Make sure you come back, to check out our full detailed review of the Galaxy A53 5G, where we will give you a more in-depth look inside what's new and better, compared to the previous models and competitors.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Pocket Lint EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G follows on from a phone that was not just a great seller for Samsung, but a phone we also rated highly. There are some incremental upgrades here which we still have to explore in our full review, but first impressions are good. There's a great design - with waterproofing adding a premium touch - fronted by a high-quality display. New core hardware promises more power, while the main camera should be capable enough. A bigger battery might just seal the deal and deliver a great experience for those who want something slightly more affordable. We will deliver a full and updated verdict on the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G as soon as we can.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Stuff TV EN→DE
At £379 for the A33 5G and £399 for the A53 5G, we’re impressed both phones cram in so much, and overjoyed we’re not seeing piddly 64GB storage capacities and mediocre screens in midrange Samsung phones anymore. The Galaxy A53 5G, in particular, seems perfect for someone who wants Galaxy S22 experiences without the flagship price. Meanwhile, the A33 5G loses a little more screen to that notch, scales back the refresh rate and reduces the megapixels. That said, pretty much everything else is identical across both phones, from the in-display fingerprint scanners to the IP67 water and dust resistance, through to massive batteries and capable 5nm processors. Expected to launch for pre-order right now, and be available for purchase either at the end of March or the beginning of April 2022, if you’re a Samsung fan in need of a cost-effective upgrade, both these phones should be blipping your radar.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Ausstattung: 50% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Ausstattung: 50% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 88% Mobilität: 93% Gehäuse: 83%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 88% Mobilität: 93% Gehäuse: 83%
Quelle: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→DE
Positive: Compact size; light weight; large battery capacity; quick charging; beautiful display; great cameras. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor; no headphone jack; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.09.2022
Quelle: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→DE
Positive: Compact size; light weight; large battery capacity; quick charging; beautiful display; great cameras. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor; no headphone jack; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.09.2022
Quelle: Zona Movilidad ES→DE
Positive: Big screen; decent cameras; long battery life; stylish design; nice performance; attractive price. Negative: Plastic case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.05.2022
Quelle: Zona Movilidad ES→DE
Positive: Big screen; decent cameras; long battery life; stylish design; nice performance; attractive price. Negative: Plastic case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.05.2022
Quelle: Hipertextual ES→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; 6GB RAM; nice display; great quad cameras; long battery life. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.04.2022
Quelle: Hipertextual ES→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; 6GB RAM; nice display; great quad cameras; long battery life. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.04.2022
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE
Positive: Good price / performance ratio; stylish design; solid workmanship; nice main camera; long battery life. Negative: No charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.04.2022
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE
Positive: Good price / performance ratio; stylish design; solid workmanship; nice main camera; long battery life. Negative: No charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.04.2022
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Positive: Attractive design; great built quality; beautiful display; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.03.2022
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Positive: Attractive design; great built quality; beautiful display; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.03.2022
Quelle: Showmetech.com.br PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Showmetech.com.br PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50% Preis: 50%
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50% Preis: 50%
Quelle: Android Geek PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Geek PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Target HD PT→DE
Positive: Good price; decent processor; nice performance; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.01.2023
Quelle: Target HD PT→DE
Positive: Good price; decent processor; nice performance; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.01.2023
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Modern design; beautiful display; nice cameras; long battery life; fast system. Negative: Average gaming performance; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.04.2022
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Modern design; beautiful display; nice cameras; long battery life; fast system. Negative: Average gaming performance; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.04.2022
Quelle: Everyeye.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Everyeye.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 69% Ausstattung: 71%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 69% Ausstattung: 71%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.03.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Preis: 60% Bildschirm: 89% Mobilität: 87% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.03.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Preis: 60% Bildschirm: 89% Mobilität: 87% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.03.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 75% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.03.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 78% Mobilität: 86% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.03.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 75% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.03.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 78% Mobilität: 86% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Techprincess IT IT→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; great autonomy; good cameras. Negative: No charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.04.2022
Quelle: Techprincess IT IT→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; great autonomy; good cameras. Negative: No charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.04.2022
Quelle: Computer Totaal NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Computer Totaal NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Positive: High performance; long battery life. Negative: No headphone jack.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Positive: High performance; long battery life. Negative: No headphone jack.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.05.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.05.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Presse Citron FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 90% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: Presse Citron FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 90% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 70%
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 70%
Quelle: 01Net FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Leistung: 60% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: 01Net FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Leistung: 60% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Clubic FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 07.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Clubic FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 07.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Presse Citron FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 90% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: Presse Citron FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 90% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: Les Mobiles FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Les Mobiles FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Journal du Geek FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Journal du Geek FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Presse Citron FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 90% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 95%
Quelle: Presse Citron FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 90% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 95%
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; compact size; excellent display; support 5G; decent cameras; nice gaming performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.11.2022
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; compact size; excellent display; support 5G; decent cameras; nice gaming performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.11.2022
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC FR→DE
Positive: Solid workmanship; attractive display; long battery life; support waterproof. Negative: Slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.04.2022
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC FR→DE
Positive: Solid workmanship; attractive display; long battery life; support waterproof. Negative: Slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.04.2022
Quelle: Telepolis PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.08.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Telepolis PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.08.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 63% Bildschirm: 92% Mobilität: 55% Gehäuse: 50%
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 63% Bildschirm: 92% Mobilität: 55% Gehäuse: 50%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: DGL.ru RU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 40% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: DGL.ru RU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 40% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail RU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail RU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: 3DNews.ru RU→DE
Positive: Excellent display; nice main camera; excellent autonomy; waterproof IP67; stereo speakers. Negative: No mini jack; combined slot; no charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.08.2022
Quelle: 3DNews.ru RU→DE
Positive: Excellent display; nice main camera; excellent autonomy; waterproof IP67; stereo speakers. Negative: No mini jack; combined slot; no charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.08.2022
Quelle: MobilArena HU HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.04.2022
Bewertung: Preis: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: MobilArena HU HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.04.2022
Bewertung: Preis: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tech World HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tech World HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Testado CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 75% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Testado CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 75% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Leistung: 84% Ausstattung: 83% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 87%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Leistung: 84% Ausstattung: 83% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 87%
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Positive: High performance; elegant design; beautiful display; microSD card slot. Negative: Weak processor; no adaptor included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.04.2022
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Positive: High performance; elegant design; beautiful display; microSD card slot. Negative: Weak processor; no adaptor included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Long battery life; quick charging; large screen; nice display; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.12.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Long battery life; quick charging; large screen; nice display; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.12.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; good price / performance ratio; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.06.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; good price / performance ratio; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.06.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; excellent display; great cameras; long battery life; high performance; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.06.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; excellent display; great cameras; long battery life; high performance; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.06.2022
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; beautiful display; nice cameras; decent performance; very long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.05.2022
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; beautiful display; nice cameras; decent performance; very long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.05.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; great built quality; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.05.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; great built quality; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.05.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Impressive design; great built quality; waterproof IP67; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Impressive design; great built quality; waterproof IP67; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; nice gaming performance; waterproof IP67; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; nice gaming performance; waterproof IP67; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.04.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; large battery capacity; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; powerful processor; nice gaming performance; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.04.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; large battery capacity; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; powerful processor; nice gaming performance; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; excellent display; powerful processor; high performance; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; nice display; great cameras; decent processor; very long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; excellent display; powerful processor; high performance; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; nice display; great cameras; decent processor; very long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; beautiful display; powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; beautiful display; powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.04.2022
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; attractive price; long battery life; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.04.2022
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; attractive price; long battery life; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.04.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; modern design; great cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.04.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; modern design; great cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; powerful hardware; long battery life; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; powerful hardware; long battery life; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; excellent cameras; support waterproof and dust avoiding; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.03.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; support 5G; large battery capacity; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.03.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; excellent cameras; support waterproof and dust avoiding; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.03.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; support 5G; large battery capacity; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.03.2022
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; stylish design; powerful processor; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.03.2022
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; stylish design; powerful processor; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.03.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; waterproof IP67; powerful processor; great cameras; nice AMOLED display; quick charging; memory card slot.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.03.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; waterproof IP67; powerful processor; great cameras; nice AMOLED display; quick charging; memory card slot.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.03.2022
Quelle: Techtimes.vn VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; excellent display; decent performance; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.03.2022
Quelle: Techtimes.vn VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; excellent display; decent performance; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.03.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; nice cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.03.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; nice cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.03.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Good price; great dedicated graphics; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Decent processor; high performance; elegant design; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Good price; great dedicated graphics; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Decent processor; high performance; elegant design; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; waterproof IP67; nice display; support 5G; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.03.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; waterproof IP67; nice display; support 5G; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.03.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; nice cameras. Negative: Mediocre design; plastic case.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.03.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; beautiful display; nice cameras; decent processor; waterproof IP67; slim size; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 21.03.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; nice cameras. Negative: Mediocre design; plastic case.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.03.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; beautiful display; nice cameras; decent processor; waterproof IP67; slim size; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 21.03.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent display; modern design; powerful processor; good price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.03.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Great built quality; waterproof; powerful processor; nice cameras; excellent display; quick charging; microSD card slot.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2022
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; great built quality; nice quad cameras; decent display.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent display; modern design; powerful processor; good price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.03.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Great built quality; waterproof; powerful processor; nice cameras; excellent display; quick charging; microSD card slot.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2022
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; great built quality; nice quad cameras; decent display.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Thin frames; good display; nice cameras. Negative: Mediocre design; no charger included.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Thin frames; good display; nice cameras. Negative: Mediocre design; no charger included.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Lyd og Billede DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 67%
Quelle: Lyd og Billede DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 67%
Quelle: Mere Mobil.dk DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 67%
Quelle: Mere Mobil.dk DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 67%
Quelle: Alt om Data DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Alt om Data DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; good cameras. Negative: Not included accessories; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.04.2022
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; good cameras. Negative: Not included accessories; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.04.2022
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A23 5GProzessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 695 5G
Grafikkarte: Qualcomm Adreno 619
Bildschirm: 6.60 Zoll, 20:9, 2408 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.197kg
Preis: 299 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Das Galaxy A23 5G macht gegenüber dem Vorgänger einen deutlichen Preissprung. Mehr Kameras, schnelleres Laden und ein etwas moderneres SoC sollen dafür entschädigen. Reicht das oder sind andere günstige 5G-Phones die bessere Wahl?
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A23 (LTE) ist ein Kompromiss ob ein guter oder schlechter, hängt von den Ansprüchen ab. Denn hier liegen Licht und Schatten eng beieinander. Display: kontrastarm und nicht sehr hell, aber groß, scharf, mit guten Farben und 90 Hertz. Prozessor: im Alltag erstaunlich flott, bei Spielen katastrophal. Kamera: recht gut, außer beim Zoom. Akku: ein Langläufer! Unterm Strich das günstigste Galaxy-Modell, das im Alltag noch Spaß macht.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.10.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A23 (LTE) ist ein Kompromiss ob ein guter oder schlechter, hängt von den Ansprüchen ab. Denn hier liegen Licht und Schatten eng beieinander. Display: kontrastarm und nicht sehr hell, aber groß, scharf, mit guten Farben und 90 Hertz. Prozessor: im Alltag erstaunlich flott, bei Spielen katastrophal. Kamera: recht gut, außer beim Zoom. Akku: ein Langläufer! Unterm Strich das günstigste Galaxy-Modell, das im Alltag noch Spaß macht.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.10.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung Galaxy A23 5G ist grundsätzlich ein brauchbares Smartphone geworden. Es hat ein flüssiges, scharfes 120Hz Display, eine brauchbare Hauptkamera und eine gute Akkulaufzeit.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung Galaxy A23 5G ist grundsätzlich ein brauchbares Smartphone geworden. Es hat ein flüssiges, scharfes 120Hz Display, eine brauchbare Hauptkamera und eine gute Akkulaufzeit.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A23 (LTE) ist ein Kompromiss – ob ein guter oder schlechter, hängt von den Ansprüchen ab. Denn hier liegen Licht und Schatten eng beieinander. Display: kontrastarm und nicht sehr hell, aber groß, scharf, mit guten Farben und 90 Hertz. Prozessor: im Alltag erstaunlich flott, bei Spielen katastrophal. Kamera: recht gut, außer beim Zoom. Akku: ein Langläufer!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A23 (LTE) ist ein Kompromiss – ob ein guter oder schlechter, hängt von den Ansprüchen ab. Denn hier liegen Licht und Schatten eng beieinander. Display: kontrastarm und nicht sehr hell, aber groß, scharf, mit guten Farben und 90 Hertz. Prozessor: im Alltag erstaunlich flott, bei Spielen katastrophal. Kamera: recht gut, außer beim Zoom. Akku: ein Langläufer!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A23 (LTE) ist ein Kompromiss – ob ein guter oder schlechter, hängt von den Ansprüchen ab. Denn hier liegen Licht und Schatten eng beieinander. Display: kontrastarm und nicht sehr hell, aber groß, scharf, mit guten Farben und 90 Hertz. Prozessor: im Alltag erstaunlich flott, bei Spielen katastrophal. Kamera: recht gut, außer beim Zoom. Akku: ein Langläufer!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.09.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A23 (LTE) ist ein Kompromiss – ob ein guter oder schlechter, hängt von den Ansprüchen ab. Denn hier liegen Licht und Schatten eng beieinander. Display: kontrastarm und nicht sehr hell, aber groß, scharf, mit guten Farben und 90 Hertz. Prozessor: im Alltag erstaunlich flott, bei Spielen katastrophal. Kamera: recht gut, außer beim Zoom. Akku: ein Langläufer!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.09.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
And that's where the Galaxy A23 5G fails - it has too many missing features, and you can get better phones by just adding €30-€50 on top of the A23 5G asking price. There is no water protection, no proximity sensor, no ambient light sensor, no 4K video capturing, and the screen isn't all that bright for an LCD - all these could be fixed by increasing your budget by a fraction. But if you can find the Galaxy A23 5G on sale for about €200 or lower, then it is going to be worth every penny as there will be no phone to beat it, stutter or no stutter.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
And that's where the Galaxy A23 5G fails - it has too many missing features, and you can get better phones by just adding €30-€50 on top of the A23 5G asking price. There is no water protection, no proximity sensor, no ambient light sensor, no 4K video capturing, and the screen isn't all that bright for an LCD - all these could be fixed by increasing your budget by a fraction. But if you can find the Galaxy A23 5G on sale for about €200 or lower, then it is going to be worth every penny as there will be no phone to beat it, stutter or no stutter.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G reached a decent global score, higher than the Galaxy A13 5G and A33 5G, mainly because of its excellent 2.5 days of autonomy in moderate use. The device showed impressive performance during idle phases, losing only 1% per night on average. On-the-go autonomy was excellent, especially when calling and using the camera. However, the device struggled when streaming videos, draining high discharge currents. The charging time was longer than average because of the small 25W charger. But the residual consumption of this power adapter was very low. When compared with devices from the same price range, the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G was just average, but its performance when calling and using the camera remained excellent.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.11.2022
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G reached a decent global score, higher than the Galaxy A13 5G and A33 5G, mainly because of its excellent 2.5 days of autonomy in moderate use. The device showed impressive performance during idle phases, losing only 1% per night on average. On-the-go autonomy was excellent, especially when calling and using the camera. However, the device struggled when streaming videos, draining high discharge currents. The charging time was longer than average because of the small 25W charger. But the residual consumption of this power adapter was very low. When compared with devices from the same price range, the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G was just average, but its performance when calling and using the camera remained excellent.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.11.2022
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The $300 no man’s land of Android phones is a wild and unpredictable place. It’s full of devices that make you pick and choose between capable cameras, long-lasting batteries, and rugged designs that are built to last. Samsung’s Galaxy A23 5G, however, asks what would happen if you found the middle ground between those specs. It pulls a little bit of everything into a solid but flawed budget-friendly device. The large, smooth, Full HD display won’t let you down, nor will its durable Gorilla Glass 5 construction. A physical dual-SIM tray with microSD expansion and a headphone jack show that some old fan-favorite features can also live on in 2022. Even the four rear cameras are an example of Samsung trying to push the envelope at an approachable price point, though they lack the consistency that keeps the brand among the top budget camera phones year in and year out. No matter the shortcomings, the Galaxy A23 5G offers a commitment to software and security updates that remains tough to match.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.09.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The $300 no man’s land of Android phones is a wild and unpredictable place. It’s full of devices that make you pick and choose between capable cameras, long-lasting batteries, and rugged designs that are built to last. Samsung’s Galaxy A23 5G, however, asks what would happen if you found the middle ground between those specs. It pulls a little bit of everything into a solid but flawed budget-friendly device. The large, smooth, Full HD display won’t let you down, nor will its durable Gorilla Glass 5 construction. A physical dual-SIM tray with microSD expansion and a headphone jack show that some old fan-favorite features can also live on in 2022. Even the four rear cameras are an example of Samsung trying to push the envelope at an approachable price point, though they lack the consistency that keeps the brand among the top budget camera phones year in and year out. No matter the shortcomings, the Galaxy A23 5G offers a commitment to software and security updates that remains tough to match.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.09.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.08.2022
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.08.2022
Quelle: Manila Shaker
The Samsung Galaxy A23 is one of Samsung's additions to their A-Series. We tested its cameras and even gaming capabilities. It offers us an all-rounder midrange smartphone; however, its price did raise some eyebrows.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.08.2022
Quelle: Manila Shaker
The Samsung Galaxy A23 is one of Samsung's additions to their A-Series. We tested its cameras and even gaming capabilities. It offers us an all-rounder midrange smartphone; however, its price did raise some eyebrows.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.08.2022
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
Finally – for the price of RM999, I think the Samsung Galaxy A23 is an excellent phone for the sub-RM1,000 segment, even though it’s only RM1 below the threshold. With that said, the Galaxy A23 is currently the cheapest smartphone with proper OIS for the main camera. And that is certainly a fantastic feature to have.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.07.2022
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
Finally – for the price of RM999, I think the Samsung Galaxy A23 is an excellent phone for the sub-RM1,000 segment, even though it’s only RM1 below the threshold. With that said, the Galaxy A23 is currently the cheapest smartphone with proper OIS for the main camera. And that is certainly a fantastic feature to have.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.07.2022
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE
On its own merits, the Samsung Galaxy A23 punches above its weight class with the provision of a large FHD+ display, a large battery with 25W fast charging and the provision of OIS stabilisation for the rear camera. For under RM1,000, you’re getting fair performance for price with a phone that covers the essentials in a very competent fashion while packing an OIS-stabilised camera. The Samsung Galaxy A23 is an entry level workhorse phone that plays to its strengths, offering a large and crisp display, long battery life and is one of, if not the only camera phone currently in its price range with optical image stabilisation to offer better quality shots.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Preis: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE
On its own merits, the Samsung Galaxy A23 punches above its weight class with the provision of a large FHD+ display, a large battery with 25W fast charging and the provision of OIS stabilisation for the rear camera. For under RM1,000, you’re getting fair performance for price with a phone that covers the essentials in a very competent fashion while packing an OIS-stabilised camera. The Samsung Galaxy A23 is an entry level workhorse phone that plays to its strengths, offering a large and crisp display, long battery life and is one of, if not the only camera phone currently in its price range with optical image stabilisation to offer better quality shots.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Preis: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
Whether the phone is right for you depends on what you want out of this smartphone. If looks, long-lasting battery, and the brand of Samsung matter to you, then you may choose to buy this phone. But considering the price, the phone is not justified for the value you are going to pay. In fact, the Galaxy M23 smartphone provides a similar design while packing a much better chipset, and camera and even has 5G connectivity while costing a bit lower than that of the Galaxy A23. If you need all these features, the Galaxy M23 is a better alternative to buy for your money, but it doesn’t have a high refresh rate display as that of the Galaxy A23. So, you will have to make a decision based on what you need.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.06.2022
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
Whether the phone is right for you depends on what you want out of this smartphone. If looks, long-lasting battery, and the brand of Samsung matter to you, then you may choose to buy this phone. But considering the price, the phone is not justified for the value you are going to pay. In fact, the Galaxy M23 smartphone provides a similar design while packing a much better chipset, and camera and even has 5G connectivity while costing a bit lower than that of the Galaxy A23. If you need all these features, the Galaxy M23 is a better alternative to buy for your money, but it doesn’t have a high refresh rate display as that of the Galaxy A23. So, you will have to make a decision based on what you need.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.06.2022
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
It's quite apparent that the Galaxy A23 isn't priced right. It has many competitors that are better equipped for the job, even ones that are a bit older - from last year. Even some home-grown competition is at hand. Sure, the Galaxy A23 snaps some pretty good photos during the day, and battery life is dependable, but that's not nearly enough to make it desirable. The display uses an IPS panel without an ambient light sensor, making things worse, the charging solution isn't competitive, the chipset drags behind most of the competition in terms of raw performance, the software is laggy, and the ultrawide camera is surprisingly even more underwhelming than initially expected. Perhaps within a couple of months or a year, the Galaxy A23 may become a bit more competitive, but with its current pricing, there are better options out there, that's for sure.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
It's quite apparent that the Galaxy A23 isn't priced right. It has many competitors that are better equipped for the job, even ones that are a bit older - from last year. Even some home-grown competition is at hand. Sure, the Galaxy A23 snaps some pretty good photos during the day, and battery life is dependable, but that's not nearly enough to make it desirable. The display uses an IPS panel without an ambient light sensor, making things worse, the charging solution isn't competitive, the chipset drags behind most of the competition in terms of raw performance, the software is laggy, and the ultrawide camera is surprisingly even more underwhelming than initially expected. Perhaps within a couple of months or a year, the Galaxy A23 may become a bit more competitive, but with its current pricing, there are better options out there, that's for sure.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
Okay, so let’s wrap up this review. Like I spoiled it at the very beginning, the Galaxy A23 is a… travesty. I guess you can argue that it has a few notable qualities like the attractive design, optimized software, and solid battery life, but they are heavily outweighed by the overall value of the phone in regards to its price. If you want a well-rounded phone in general, then the Redmi Note 11S and Realme’s Narzo 50 are a couple of great options in Nepal. And in the Indian market, the POCO X4 Pro 5G, Galaxy F23, Moto G71, and Realme 9 SE all offer a much better value than the Galaxy A23. What I’m trying to say is there’s simply no justifying this travesty of a phone. Maybe Samsung already has a cheaper ‘M’ or ‘F’ series rebrand ready for the A23. But even then I doubt it’ll be able to match the competition with its price-to-performance ratio.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Preis: 60% Leistung: 65% Bildschirm: 65% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
Okay, so let’s wrap up this review. Like I spoiled it at the very beginning, the Galaxy A23 is a… travesty. I guess you can argue that it has a few notable qualities like the attractive design, optimized software, and solid battery life, but they are heavily outweighed by the overall value of the phone in regards to its price. If you want a well-rounded phone in general, then the Redmi Note 11S and Realme’s Narzo 50 are a couple of great options in Nepal. And in the Indian market, the POCO X4 Pro 5G, Galaxy F23, Moto G71, and Realme 9 SE all offer a much better value than the Galaxy A23. What I’m trying to say is there’s simply no justifying this travesty of a phone. Maybe Samsung already has a cheaper ‘M’ or ‘F’ series rebrand ready for the A23. But even then I doubt it’ll be able to match the competition with its price-to-performance ratio.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Preis: 60% Leistung: 65% Bildschirm: 65% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A23 smartphone is announced in March 2022, and the phone arrives with a price tag of $221 (Rs 16,999 in India) approx. Let’s start with the screen that offers a TFT display with a 6.6 inches display. The FHD screen is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection and under the hood, the Galaxy A23 phone is powered by a 6nm – Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G chipset that provides Adreno 610 GPU support. As for the software end, the One UI 4.1 is integrated over the Android 12 OS. The Samsung Galaxy A23 comes with a quad-camera with a 50MP primary camera, 5MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, and 2MP depth lens. It also includes an 8MP selfie camera with this setup, you can record 1080p videos precisely. The Samsung Galaxy A23 is available in 4GB/6GB/8GB RAM with 64GB/128GB internal storage. The battery section brings a Li-Po 5000mAh battery with 15W fast charging support. The Galaxy A23 phone is available in Black, White, Peach, and Blue color options.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2022
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A23 smartphone is announced in March 2022, and the phone arrives with a price tag of $221 (Rs 16,999 in India) approx. Let’s start with the screen that offers a TFT display with a 6.6 inches display. The FHD screen is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection and under the hood, the Galaxy A23 phone is powered by a 6nm – Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G chipset that provides Adreno 610 GPU support. As for the software end, the One UI 4.1 is integrated over the Android 12 OS. The Samsung Galaxy A23 comes with a quad-camera with a 50MP primary camera, 5MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, and 2MP depth lens. It also includes an 8MP selfie camera with this setup, you can record 1080p videos precisely. The Samsung Galaxy A23 is available in 4GB/6GB/8GB RAM with 64GB/128GB internal storage. The battery section brings a Li-Po 5000mAh battery with 15W fast charging support. The Galaxy A23 phone is available in Black, White, Peach, and Blue color options.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2022
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; support 5G; real dual SIM. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; mono speakers; no charger included; PLS panel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 26.12.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; support 5G; real dual SIM. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; mono speakers; no charger included; PLS panel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 26.12.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; large battery capacity; support 5G; true dual SIM. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; mono speakers; no charger included; PLS panel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 12.12.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; large battery capacity; support 5G; true dual SIM. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; mono speakers; no charger included; PLS panel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 12.12.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; long battery life; support 5G; real dual SIM. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; mono speakers; without charger; PLS panel only.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 24.10.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; long battery life; support 5G; real dual SIM. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; mono speakers; without charger; PLS panel only.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 24.10.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; large battery capacity; support 5G; real dual SIM. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; mono speakers; without charger; PLS panel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 24.08.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; large battery capacity; support 5G; real dual SIM. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; mono speakers; without charger; PLS panel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 24.08.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Decent cameras; large battery capacity; support 5G; true dual SIM. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; mono speakers; no charger included; PLS panel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 30.07.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Decent cameras; large battery capacity; support 5G; true dual SIM. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; mono speakers; no charger included; PLS panel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 30.07.2023
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.04.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 60%
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.04.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 60%
Quelle: 4G News PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 66% Preis: 70% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: 4G News PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 66% Preis: 70% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Android Geek PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 60% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Android Geek PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 60% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 40% Preis: 40%
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 40% Preis: 40%
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Nice performance; support 5G; decent cameras. Negative: Short battery life; dark display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.04.2023
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Nice performance; support 5G; decent cameras. Negative: Short battery life; dark display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.04.2023
Quelle: Mais Tecnologia PT→DE
Positive: Good price; excellent display; decent gaming performance; long battery life. Negative: Poor cameras; only 4GB RAM.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.01.2023
Quelle: Mais Tecnologia PT→DE
Positive: Good price; beautiful display; long battery life; headphone jack. Negative: Only 4GB RAM.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.01.2023
Quelle: Mais Tecnologia PT→DE
Positive: Good price; excellent display; decent gaming performance; long battery life. Negative: Poor cameras; only 4GB RAM.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.01.2023
Quelle: Mais Tecnologia PT→DE
Positive: Good price; beautiful display; long battery life; headphone jack. Negative: Only 4GB RAM.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.01.2023
Quelle: Target HD PT→DE
Positive: Big screen; nice display; decent performance; good main camera; large battery capacity; quuck charging; support 5G. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; poor selfie camera; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.01.2023
Quelle: Target HD PT→DE
Positive: Big screen; nice display; decent performance; good main camera; large battery capacity; quuck charging; support 5G. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; poor selfie camera; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.01.2023
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Elegant design; beautiful display; high performance; long battery life. Negative: Poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.05.2022
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Elegant design; beautiful display; high performance; long battery life. Negative: Poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.05.2022
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Preis: 65% Ausstattung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75% Ergonomie: 75%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Preis: 65% Ausstattung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75% Ergonomie: 75%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 08.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 60% Ergonomie: 60%
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 08.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 60% Ergonomie: 60%
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Good price; great built quality; nice performance; support 5G; decent cameras; long battery life. Negative: Mediocre notch design; poor display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.02.2023
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Good price; great built quality; nice performance; support 5G; decent cameras; long battery life. Negative: Mediocre notch design; poor display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.02.2023
Quelle: Journal du Geek FR→DE
Positive: High autonomy; pleasant interface; good performance; elegant design; support 5G. Negative: Poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.01.2023
Quelle: Journal du Geek FR→DE
Positive: High autonomy; pleasant interface; good performance; elegant design; support 5G. Negative: Poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.01.2023
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Decent hardware; nice gaming performance; good price. Negative: Unsupported 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.10.2022
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Decent hardware; nice gaming performance; good price. Negative: Unsupported 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.10.2022
Quelle: MobilArena HU HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.11.2022
Bewertung: Preis: 60% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: MobilArena HU HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.11.2022
Bewertung: Preis: 60% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Compact size; light weight; modern design; excellent display; decent hardware; large battery capacity; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.04.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Compact size; light weight; modern design; excellent display; decent hardware; large battery capacity; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; big screen; nice cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.12.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; big screen; nice cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.12.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; great built quality; good price; nice cameras; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.12.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; great built quality; good price; nice cameras; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.12.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Excellent display; high performance; powerful processor; large battery capacity; good quad cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.12.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Excellent display; high performance; powerful processor; large battery capacity; good quad cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.12.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; high autonomy; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.11.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; high autonomy; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.11.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; beautiful display; powerful processor; support 5G; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.11.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; beautiful display; powerful processor; support 5G; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.11.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; excellent display; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.11.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; excellent display; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.11.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Support 5G; great connectivity; high performance; nice display; excellent cameras; modern design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.11.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Support 5G; great connectivity; high performance; nice display; excellent cameras; modern design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.11.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; decent hardware; nice performance; big screen; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.05.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; decent hardware; nice performance; big screen; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.05.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; impressive cameras; large battery capacity; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.05.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; impressive cameras; large battery capacity; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.05.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; great display; low price; modern design; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; great display; low price; modern design; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent display; nice cameras; very long battery life; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent display; nice cameras; very long battery life; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.04.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; beautiful design; big screen; decent performance; nice cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.04.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; beautiful design; big screen; decent performance; nice cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Great quad cameras; decent processor; big screen; long battery life; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Great quad cameras; decent processor; big screen; long battery life; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Good price; decent processor; great gaming performance; big screen; impressive battery life; nice quad cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Good price; decent processor; great gaming performance; big screen; impressive battery life; nice quad cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; nice cameras; big screen; beautiful display; powerful processor; high performance; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; nice cameras; big screen; beautiful display; powerful processor; high performance; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Nice display; great cameras; long battery life; quick charging; impressive performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Nice display; great cameras; long battery life; quick charging; impressive performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Decent cameras; nice display; powerful processor; excellent battery life.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Decent cameras; nice display; powerful processor; excellent battery life.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2022
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; good price; nice cameras; large battery capacity. Negative: Poor display.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.03.2022
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; good price; nice cameras; large battery capacity. Negative: Poor display.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.03.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Nice quad cameras; decent processor; attractive price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.03.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Nice quad cameras; decent processor; attractive price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.03.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; modern design; powerful processor; excellent cameras; compact size; light weight.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; modern design; powerful processor; excellent cameras; compact size; light weight.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; good price; nice cameras; decent hardware; high performance; long battery life; quick charging.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; good price; nice cameras; decent hardware; high performance; long battery life; quick charging.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.03.2022
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A73 5GProzessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 778G 5G
Grafikkarte: Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Bildschirm: 6.70 Zoll, 2400:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.181kg
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Ricks Tech
Support, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.03.2023
Quelle: Cashify EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G gives the impression of a much more expensive phone than it actually is. It has a display that is both vivid and detailed, making it a joy to use for consuming content. The device is not only aesthetically pleasing but also lightweight and easy to carry around. The phone comes equipped with a powerful processor that is not only able to breeze through routine tasks but is also able to play games with respectable graphical settings. Additionally, the phone is waterproof up to IP67 standards, and, all things considered, its cameras are good as well. Despite the fact that the phone has a decent overall package when it comes to performance, the display, and the battery, it falls short in some essential areas. One of them is that there is no charging brick and the device charges slowly. Even though it lacks flagship specifications, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G succeeds as a whole because it does a good job in most areas. The brand value of Samsung with the promise of 4 years of OS updates definitely makes it a solid recommendation.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.06.2022
Quelle: Lowyat.net EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A73 comes with mostly all the sort of incremental upgrades that you’d expect from an annual refresh. Its available colours are more discreet, but otherwise it looks pretty much the same as its preceding model did. Which is great for those who loved the look of the A72, but not quite so for those who didn’t. While it’s overall a good mid-range device, the fact that it breaks past the RM2000 barrier may be a hard pill to swallow for some. Ditto the lack of a 3.5mm audio jack, especially if it is something you still actively use. But if these are things that don’t bother you, then the Samsung Galaxy A73 is a good midrange device to pick up if you’re just looking for your once-in-a-few-year upgrade.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.05.2022
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
The Galaxy A73 5G is a capable, fully equipped mid-range 5G device with a premium price tag let down by dated internals and sub-par charging. Highlights over rivals, though, include IP67 waterproofing and long software support.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE
The benefit that comes with Samsung is the promise of four coming updates, which is really enticing. At a lower price point, this phone was a perfect buy. The bloatware was a problem, but not as much a headache as earlier. Lack of a charger and cap at 25W was another issue, but you can look past it. If you can wait a few months, this phone would be a steal at a 20 - 25 per cent discount.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.05.2022
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
The Galaxy A73 is, as the title of this review has already given away, an excellent phone. It’s pricier than it should be, but with a few discounts, the Galaxy A73 is a great package. Fast and fluid performance, great photos from the main camera, a beautiful high refresh rate display, a water resistant design, stereo speakers, and all-day battery life are all awesome to have, and the four years of OS upgrades that Samsung is promising is just unbeatable in any segment, let alone the A73’s. If you don’t care about software updates, though, I would recommend trying to get the Galaxy S20 FE, which can be purchased at a similar price in many markets. And look, there are also many other options on the market that offer an equal or better experience at a similar or lower price, so all I will say is that if you do end up buying the Galaxy A73, you won’t be disappointed.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.05.2022
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A73 smartphone arrives with its equal share of flaws and features. But, if you look at the whole picture, you are getting a pretty decent combination of software and specs. The display quality is great, but it lacks the HDR features, while the performance won’t feel that underwhelming. As far as software is concerned, you won’t face many problems, the transition between the apps is quite good. The camera section improved, and the battery renders ample screen time.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.05.2022
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
While the Galaxy A73 isn't exactly a bad phone in any way, its confusing price tag mixed with the lack of differentiation from last year's Galaxy A52s means we are hesitant on recommending it to anyone looking for a semi-flagship Samsung phone right now. Instead, you should save some money and go with the A52s which is almost the same phone as the A73.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 75% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Pokde EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A73 is an excellent midrange smartphone with strong overall performance. It can’t match flagship devices but if you don’t need the luxury of a high-end camera system or blazing fast speeds, this will certainly be able to satisfy you, especially with a price tag of RM2,099. The 4 years of OS upgrades and 5 years of security patches just sweetens the deal even more.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Preis: 85% Leistung: 75% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: KL Gadget Guy EN→DE
Overall, the Galaxy A73 5G is a great all-rounder mid-range phone that one shouldn’t hesitate to pick up if you aren’t ready to spend two months of a typical Malaysian salary on a flagship phone, although its selling price of RM2,099 is a little hard to swallow for some, as you can easily top up slightly extra cash for a Galaxy S21 FE, which at least offers true flagship performance and a camera system that can serve you better, but for those who wants to feel more awesome, perhaps the Galaxy A73 5G’s design and colors might just be your cup of tea.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
For me, authenticity means not being afraid of your “true” self and being real whether in the workplace or relationship. Right around the time, when I was trying to understand the true meaning of accepting myself, the Galaxy A73 showed a clear path. It’s a premium mid-range phone (starts at Rs 41,999) that never tries to project itself as an alternative or equivalent to the flagship Galaxy S22 Plus; instead, it pitches itself as an all-new device for someone who has never experienced the kind of features it got at this price point. It could be a big phone… it might lack the latest and most advanced Snapdragon chip… it might not come with a glass back… but these things don’t really matter when the product truly differentiates itself from the competition and tries to win over customers for what it offers. The Galaxy A73 is not bringing anything new or trying to fix something; it’s offering a choice to customers at a certain price point without overpromising anything. That’s a good thing. It’s a healthy practice by making everyone clear what to expect and what not to expect.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G brings to the table an exceptional amount of value for what you pay for. For RM2,099, you’re getting a large 120Hz display that is fantastic to behold, good overall performance, 5G connectivity, a decent set of cameras for casual users, an IP67 water resistant chassis and expandable storage, making it a very capable workhorse.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G starts at Rs 41,999 and for the price, gets more than a few things right. For one, the device is among the rare breed of Android phones priced under Rs 50K to ship with an IP rating. Furthermore, the device looks good too and is relatively lightweight as well. More importantly, the handset ships with a capable processor that can not just tackle everyday tasks without breaking a sweat, but can also run games at respectable graphics settings. That’s not to say that the phone is perfect. In fact, you can get a significantly faster Android with a premium design for the same price or less. Furthermore, unlike the competition, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G doesn’t ship with a fast wired charger in the box and the handset’s wired charging speeds pale in comparison to the competition as well. Be that as it may, the device offers a capable camera stack and what is quite possibly, the most refined custom skin on any Android phone at the moment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
Should you buy the Galaxy A73 5G? Yes. I think the Galaxy A73 5G is still one of the best mid-range smartphones that you can buy right now. The overall experience that the Galaxy A73 5G offers is magnificent – though the price is just… kinda high at RM2,099. I mean, you can get the Galaxy A52s at about RM1.5k from retailers at Shopee or Lazada now, but you won’t get the same software support as the Galaxy A73 5G, and I think that is one of the important factors that many people do not care about until it is too late.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.04.2022
Quelle: The Times of India EN→DE
The Oppo F21 Pro 5G is all about camera performance. From picture-perfect portraits to overall colours and detailing, it ensures great images in daylight. However, for night photography, Oppo still needs to figure out something really impressive. But as we said, it’s not just about cameras. F21 Pro 5G provides decent battery life, stylish design, bright display, smooth user experience with lots of features, and decent overall performance for day-to-day tasks. Though, its 60Hz refresh rate display at the price of Rs. 27,999 surely leaves room for improvement. But, we can’t neglect the competition in the same price range and the biggest competitor is none other than its own Reno 7 5G with a better selfie camera, higher refresh rate and MediaTek Dimensity 900 5G processor in just an extra 1000 bucks. Besides this, Vivo V21 5G can be another option with a 44MP selfie camera and a higher refresh rate priced at Rs. 26,699. Well, if camera is not your priority, then there is Xiaomi 11i HyperCharge with good display and its 120W fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 20.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy A73 smartphone comes with 5G support at an expected price of $590 (Rs 44,990 in India) approx. As for the primary features, the phone comes with a 6.7 inches Super AMOLED panel for a better and smooth experience. The phone offers a 120Hz refresh rate display. Under the hood, the phone is powered by a 6nm Snapdragon 778G chipset that provides Adreno 642L GPU support. Also, you are getting the software layering of Android 12 based on the One UI 4.1 interface. Besides this, you can choose from 6GB / 8GB RAM that packs with 128GB / 256GB internal storage. Apart from the build quality, the phone weighs roughly 181 g. For the next level of photography and videography, the Samsung Galaxy A73 phone comes with a quad-camera setup that has a 108MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide, 5MP macro, and 5MP depth lens. Features in the rear camera setup include LED flash, HDR, Panorama, and face detection. On the front, the Galaxy A73 has a 32MP camera so you can click amazing selfies and video chat. With this setup, you can record videos in up to 4K on both cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.03.2022
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80%
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; great cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.06.2022
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 89% Leistung: 88% Mobilität: 84% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Log.com.tr TR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Affordable price; high performance; beautiful design; great built quality; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.02.2023
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high performance; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.02.2023
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; beautiful display; nice gaming performance; long battery life; quick charging; great cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.02.2023
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; high performance; great cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.12.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Awesome design; great built quality; powerful hardware; high gaming performance; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.09.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; great display; powerful processor; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.05.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Nice display; decent performance. Negative: No headphone jack; unstable macro cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.05.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; nice cameras; great display; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.05.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; beautiful display; high performance; nice cameras.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.05.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; big screen; large battery capacity; great display; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; excellent display; big screen; waterproof and dust avoiding; great cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; attractive price; powerful hardware; high gaming performance; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.04.2022
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; large battery capacity; nice cameras; waterproof IP67; excellent display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.04.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; solid workmanship; powerful hardware; high performance; attractive price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; great built quality; powerful hardware; nice cameras; attractive price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; long battery life; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; impressive cameras; great display; high gaming performance; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; nice display; powerful processor; high performance; waterproof IP67; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent quad cameras; beautiful display; powerful processor; high performance; waterproof IP67; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.04.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Very big screen; powerful processor; excellent cameras; beautiful design; super fast charging.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.04.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; solid workmanship; powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.03.2022
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; metal case; nice display; powerful hardware; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.03.2022
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137FProzessor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio G80
Grafikkarte: ARM Mali-G52 MP2
Bildschirm: 6.60 Zoll, 20:9, 2408 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.195kg
Preis: 169 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Das Samsung Galaxy A13 4G gibt es mittlerweile auch mit MediaTek-SoC, das nicht nur mehr Power mitbringt, sondern auch andere Kleinigkeiten an Samsungs günstigem Smartphone ändert. Genug Grund für uns, die neue Version im Test mal genauer unter die Lupe zu nehmen.
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung A13 („NE“) bestätigt im Praxistest, weshalb es zu den meistverkauften Modellen gehört – Es liefert in der Praxis einfach gut ab.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung A13 („NE“) bestätigt im Praxistest, weshalb es zu den meistverkauften Modellen gehört – Es liefert in der Praxis einfach gut ab.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The previous Galaxy A12 has been kicking around for a while now, and it’s certainly a bit outdated by modern standards. It didn’t initially receive a recommendation in our review, but with 2022 updates to the cameras, design and software, the Galaxy A13 was perfectly positioned to finally make an appearance on our best budget smartphones list. Except Samsung really missed the mark with this one. Its decision to opt for one of the weakest mobile chipsets we’ve tested in quite some time is a baffling one, and the lack of 5G connectivity is a glaring omission as well. Neither the extra ultrawide camera nor the 1080p screen are enough of an incentive to mask the fact that we’re getting the short end of the stick. It might be dirt cheap, but don’t let Samsung fool you – you can do better for the price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
The previous Galaxy A12 has been kicking around for a while now, and it’s certainly a bit outdated by modern standards. It didn’t initially receive a recommendation in our review, but with 2022 updates to the cameras, design and software, the Galaxy A13 was perfectly positioned to finally make an appearance on our best budget smartphones list. Except Samsung really missed the mark with this one. Its decision to opt for one of the weakest mobile chipsets we’ve tested in quite some time is a baffling one, and the lack of 5G connectivity is a glaring omission as well. Neither the extra ultrawide camera nor the 1080p screen are enough of an incentive to mask the fact that we’re getting the short end of the stick. It might be dirt cheap, but don’t let Samsung fool you – you can do better for the price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Kommentar
Samsung: Die Samsung Group ist der größte südkoreanische Mischkonzern und wurde 1938 gegründet. In der Samsung-Gruppe waren 2014 489.000 Menschen beschäftigt, und sie gehört zu den weltweit größten Unternehmen gemessen an Umsatz und Marktstärke. Der Name Samsung bedeutet im Koreanischen "Drei Sterne" und repräsentiert die drei Söhne des Firmengründers. Das Unternehmen wurde 1938 als Lebensmittelladen gegründet. Mit der 1969 gegründeten Tochter Samsung Electronics nahm Samsung die Fertigung elektrotechnischer Artikel in Angriff, wobei man sich frühzeitig auf Unterhaltungselektronik und Haushaltsgeräte konzentrierte. Weitere Zweige, in denen der Großkonzern tätig ist, sind Maschinenbau, Automobile (Hyundai), Versicherung, Großhandel, Immobilien und Freizeit. Samsung stellt eine breite Palette von elektronischen Produkten her, darunter Smartphones, Fernsehgeräte, Haushaltsgeräte und Halbleiter. Die Galaxy-Smartphone-Reihe des Unternehmens ist eine der beliebtesten der Welt. Samsung ist auch ein wichtiger Akteur in der Halbleiterindustrie und stellt Speicherchips und Prozessoren für viele andere Elektronikhersteller her.
Diese Karten können nur sehr alte und sehr anspruchslose 3D Spiele flüssig darstellen. Anwendungen wie Office, Internet surfen, Bildbearbeitung oder (SD) Videoschnitt sind jedoch ohne große Einschränkungen möglich.
Qualcomm Adreno 618: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SoC. Etwas schnellere Version der Adreno 616.
Qualcomm Adreno 619: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 750 SoC. Die Performance ist deutlich besser als der alte Adreno 612.
ARM Mali-G57 MP2: Integrierte Grafikkarte der Mittelklasse mit 2 Kernen / Clustern (MC2 oder MP2) basierend auf die Valhall Architektur.
3D Spiele sind auf diesen Vertretern nur in Ausnahmen spielbar, grundsätzlich sind die Grafiklösungen hierfür jedoch nicht geeignet. Office Programme und Internet surfen dürfte jedoch ohne Problem möglich sein.
unknown:
Imagination PowerVR GE8320: Integrierter Grafikchip für ARM-Prozessoren der unteren Mittelklasse.
Einige nicht anspruchsvolle aktuelle Spiele können mit geringen Details noch flüssig gespielt werden. Für Office und Video natürlich ausreichende Leistungsreserven.
ARM Mali-G52 MP2: Integrierte Grafikkarte der Mittelklasse mit 2 Kernen / Clustern.
ARM Mali-G52 MP1: Integrierte Grafikkarte der Mittelklasse mit einem Kern / Cluster (MP1 oder MC1).
ARM Mali-G68 MP4: Integrierte Grafikkarte der Mittelklasse mit 4 Kernen / Clustern.
Qualcomm Adreno 642L: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC. Laut Qualcomm um 40% schneller als die alte Adreno 620 im Snapdragon 768G.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
SD 730: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo 470 Kernen (2x ARM Cortex A76 2,2 GHz und 6x ARM Cortex-A55 1,8 GHz) und einem X15 LTE Modem (bis zu 800 Mbps Download).
SD 750G 5G: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo 570 Kernen (2x ARM Cortex A77 2,2 GHz und 6x ARM Cortex-A55 1,8 GHz) und einem X52 5G Modem (bis zu 3700 Mbps Download).
SD 720G: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo 465 Kernen (2x ARM Cortex A76 2,3 GHz und 6x ARM Cortex-A55 1,8 GHz) und einem X15 LTE Modem (bis zu 800 Mbps Download).
SD 695 5G: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo 660 Kernen (zwei ARM Cortex-A78 basierte Kerne mit bis 2,2 GHz und 6 ARM Cortex-A55 mit bis zu 1,7 GHz) und einem X51 5G Modem.
SD 778G 5G: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo 670 Kernen (4x ARM Cortex A78 2,4 GHz Prime Core und 4x ARM Cortex-A55 1,8 GHz) und einem X53 5G Modem (bis zu 3300 Mbps Download). Der Chip wird im modernen 6nm EUV Prozess bei TSMC gefertigt.
Samsung :
Dimensity 700: Der Dimensity 700 ist ein schneller Mittelklasse-Prozessor mit integriertem 5G Modem. Der CPU-Teil integriert zwei schnelle ARM Cortex-A76 Kerne mit bis zu 2,2 GHz und sechs Stromsparkerne vom Typ Cortex-A55 mit bis zu 2 GHz.
Exynos 850: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 integrierten kleinen ARM Cortex-A55 Prozessorkernen die mit bis zu 2 GHz takten können. Weiters ist im Chip noch ein LTE Modem (300 MBit/s Download) und ein Wifi-5 (ac) Modem integriert.
Mediatek Mediatek:
Helio P35 MT6765: ARM-basierter Octa-Core-SoC (max. 2,3 GHz) für Smartphones und Tablets. Produziert in 12nm bei TSMC und beinhaltet ein LTE Modem (Cat 7 300 Mbps Download, Cat 13 150 Mbps Upload).
Helio G80: ARM-basierter Octa-Core-SoC (2x Cortex-A75, 6x Cortex-A55) mit 64-Bit-Unterstützung und bis zu 2 GHz Taktrate für Smartphones und Tablets. Integriert ein Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) LTE Modem (4G) und eine ARM Mali-G52 MP2 mit bis zu 950 MHz.
Samsung Exynos:
Exynos 1280: Der Exynos 1280 ist ein Mittelklasse-SoC für Smartphones mit zwei schnellen Cortex-A78 Kernen mit bis zu 2,4 GHz und sechs kleinen A55 Kernen mit bis zu 2 GHz. Er wird in 5nm hergestellt und unterstützt 5G und WifFi 5.
» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.
0.179 kg:
Most smartphones and only a few tablets fall into this weight category. Only a few smartphones are heavier and should rather be considered tablets.
0.205 kg:
77.57%: Weltbewegend ist diese Bewertung nicht. Diese Bewertung muss man eigentlich als unterdurchschnittlich ansehen, denn es gibt etwa ebenso mehr Geräte mit schlechtere Beurteilungen als Besseren. Eine Kaufempfehlung kann man nur mit viel Wohlwollen darin sehen, es sei denn es handelt sich um Websites, die generell streng urteilen.
» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.