Beelink SER9 Test: AMD Zen 5 macht diesen Mini-PC schneller als je zuvor

Name: Beelink SER9
Brand: Beelink

Ryzen AI 9 pusht die Leistung.

Beelink baut als einer der ersten Mini-PC-Hersteller die neueste Ryzen 9 CPU von AMD in ihre Geräte ein. Allerdings steigt dadurch auch der Preis entsprechend, so dass dies eines der teureren Angebote des Herstellers ist. Zahlt sich mehr Leistung für mehr Geld aus?
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (übersetzt von DeepL / Ninh Duy) Veröffentlicht am 16.11.2024 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
Zen 5 AMD Mini PC

Fazit - Der neue Ryzen AI 9 Prozessor steigert die Leistung noch weiter

Der SER8 war bereits ein hervorragender Mini-PC mit seinem komplett neuen Design, der modernen AMD Zen 4 CPU und den überarbeiteten Ports. Der SER9 verdoppelt die Leistung durch ein Upgrade auf einen noch schnelleren Zen 5 Prozessor. Die neue Ryzen 9 AI CPU ist außerdem schneller und leiser als angesichts der Größe des SER9 erwartet.

Testgerät zur Verfügung gestellt von Beelink

Download der lizensierten Bewertungsgrafik als PNG / SVG

Das SER9 ist natürlich nicht perfekt, denn gängige Funktionen anderer Mini-PCs wie VESA-Montage, aufrüstbarer Arbeitsspeicher oder Kensington Lock fehlen beim Beelink. Außerdem ist das System etwas größer und schwerer als viele Konkurrenten, was zum Teil auf die integrierten Stereolautsprecher und die Vapor-Chamber-Kühlung zurückzuführen ist. Natürlich "bezahlen" Sie auch für die Leistungssteigerung, wenn es um den Stromverbrauch geht.

Pro

+ sehr schnelle CPU- und GPU-Leistung für die Größe

+ respektabler Leistungszuwachs gegenüber Zen 4

+ integrierte Stereo-Lautsprecher

+ hochwertiges Metallgehäuse

+ kleines 100-Watt-Netzteil

+ mehrere USB-C Ports

Contra

- RAM ist verlötet, nicht aufrüstbar

- mögliche Probleme bei 4K60-Videowiedergabe

- kein Wi-Fi 6E oder Wi-Fi 7

- keine VESA-Halterungsvorrichtung

- kann beim Spielen ruckeln

- teuer

Preis und Verfügbarkeit

Amazon listet den Beelink SER9 Mini PC mit AMD Ryzen 9 AI bereits, er ist aber zum Testzeitpunkt noch nicht verfügbar.

Amazon

Beelink SER9 Mini PC, AMD Ryzen 9 AI HX 370(12C/24T bis zu 5,1GHz), 32GB LPDDR5X 1TB PCIe4.0 SSD Mini Gaming PC, 4K Triple Display, HDMI/DP/USB4.0, 2.5G LAN/WiFi 6/BT5.2

Mögliche Konkurrenten im Vergleich

Bild	Modell / Test	Preis ab	Gewicht	Dicke	Display
1. 77.1%	Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB RAM, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: Listenpreis: 1000 USD	814 g	44.7 mm	x
2. 74.9%	Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB RAM, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. 45,99 € KFD 120W Ladegerät Netzteil... Listenpreis: 650 USD	776 g	44.7 mm	x
3.	Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB RAM, 500 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. 23,99 € TAIFU 19V 3,42A Mini PC Netz... Listenpreis: 430 USD	440 g	40 mm	x
4. 66.1%	MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB RAM, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 532,92 € Bestpreis 753€ computeruniverse.net 2. 753€ Cyberport.de 3. 759.33€ computeruniverse.at	660 g	50.1 mm	x
5. 67.3%	GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H ⎘ Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB RAM, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 969,95 € Geizhals Suche	528 g	47 mm	x
6. 75.3%	Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB RAM, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1.249,00 € Bestpreis 1241.75€ Jacob Elektronik direkt 2. 1241.77€ Easynotebooks.de 3. 1241.78€ Notebook.de	622 g	41 mm	x

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Fazit - Der neue Ryzen AI 9 Prozessor steigert die Leistung noch weiter
Spezifikationen
Gehäuse
Anschlussausstattung
Performance
Emissionen
Energieverwaltung
Notebookcheck Bewertung

Der SER9 ist der Nachfolger des SER8. Die Zen 4 Ryzen 7 8845HS CPU wird durch den neueren Zen 5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ersetzt. Die Gehäuse ist ansonsten identisch.

Unser Testmodell ist mit der oben erwähnten Zen 5 CPU, 32 GB RAM und einer 1 TB NVMe SSD ausgestattet und kostet in Amerika etwa $1.000 USD. Andere SKUs sind zum Zeitpunkt der Erstellung dieses Artikels nicht verfügbar.

Zu den Alternativen zum SER9 gehören andere High-End-Mini-PCs wie der GMK NucBox K9, Asus NUC 14 Pro oder der Bosgame M1.

Weitere Beelink-Tests:

Spezifikationen

Beelink SER9

Prozessor

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 12 x 2 - 5.1 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Strix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)

Grafikkarte

AMD Radeon 890M - 4 GB VRAM, Kerntakt: 2900 MHz, Speichertakt: 937 MHz, LPDDR5, 32.0.12019.1028

RAM

32 GB

, LPDDR5x, 7500 MHz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Massenspeicher

Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, 1024 GB

Soundkarte

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Anschlüsse

2 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Anschlüsse: 2x 3.5 mm combo

Netzwerk

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Abmessungen

Höhe x Breite x Tiefe (in mm): 44.7 x 135 x 135

Betriebssystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Sonstiges

HDMI cable, 12 Monate Garantie

Gewicht

814 g, Netzteil: 277 g

Preis

1000 USD

Amazon

Links

Beelink Startseite

Hinweis: Der Hersteller kann abweichende Bauteile wie Bildschirme, Laufwerke und Speicherriegel mit ähnlichen Spezifikationen unter dem gleichen Modellnamen einsetzen.

Vollständige Spezifikationen anzeigen

[+] Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

» vergleiche

Gehäuse

Die SER8 war bereits eine komplette Neuentwicklung des SER7 und so ist das SER9 einfach eine kleinere Aktualisierung des SER8 ohne größere physische Unterschiede. Das graue Metallgehäuse und der Kunststoffboden sehen viel professioneller aus als das ältere Design aus der SER7-Ära und fühlen sich auch so an.

Größenvergleich

Anschlussausstattung

Die Anschlussoptionen haben sich gegenüber dem SER8 nicht geändert. Das System kann mit USB-C-Netzadaptern von Drittanbietern anstelle des mitgelieferten Netzteils betrieben werden.

Vorderseite: Ein/Aus-Taste, Reset-Taste, 3,5-mm-Headset, USB-C (10 Gbps), USB-A 3.2 (10 Gbps)

Rückseite: USB-A 3.2 (10 Gbit/s), USB-A 2.0 (480 Mbit/s), RJ-45 (2,5 Gbit/s), DisplayPort 1.4 (4K@144), USB-A 2.0 (480 Mbit/s), HDMI 2.1 (4K@120), 3,5 mm Kopfhörer, USB-C 4.0 mit DisplayPort + Power Delivery (40 Gbit/s), Netzteil

Kommunikation

Das Intel AX200 unterstützt standardmäßig Wi-Fi 6 und Bluetooth 5.2, Wi-Fi 6E und Wi-Fi 7 hingegen nicht.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	823 (607^min - 901^max) MBit/s +35%
Beelink SER8 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	812 (641^min - 888^max) MBit/s +33%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	707 (666^min - 737^max) MBit/s +16%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	636 (430^min - 784^max) MBit/s +4%
Beelink SER9 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	609 (334^min - 677^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	951 (926^min - 965^max) MBit/s +17%
Beelink SER9 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	814 (717^min - 861^max) MBit/s
Beelink SER8 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	784 (679^min - 845^max) MBit/s -4%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	764 (635^min - 829^max) MBit/s -6%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	692 (506^min - 872^max) MBit/s -15%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1400 (1199^min - 1463^max) MBit/s
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1223 (1160^min - 1303^max) MBit/s
Beelink SEi11 Pro MediaTek RZ608	722 (447^min - 789^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1560 (1528^min - 1585^max) MBit/s
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1446 (1321^min - 1486^max) MBit/s
Beelink SEi11 Pro MediaTek RZ608	743 (453^min - 793^max) MBit/s

Beelink SER9; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø814 (717-861)

Beelink SER9; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø598 (334-677)

Wartung

Die Wartung ist ähnlich wie beim SER8, aber mit einem nennenswerten Unterschied: Es gibt jetzt keine SODIMM-Steckplätze mehr, da der RAM auf dem SER9 verlötet ist.

Wenn Sie die Bodenplatte abnehmen, werden die internen Stereolautsprecher sichtbar.

Wenn Sie die Lautsprecher entfernen, kommen die beiden aufrüstbaren M.2 2280 SSD-Steckplätze zum Vorschein.

Nachhaltigkeit

Die Verpackung besteht größtenteils aus Papier und Pappe mit ein wenig Plastik für das Zubehör. Der Hersteller wirbt nicht mit weiteren Nachhaltigkeitsmaßnahmen.

Zubehör und Garantie

Die Verpackung enthält neben den üblichen Unterlagen und dem Netzteil auch ein HDMI-Kabel. Eine VESA-Halterung ist nicht vorhanden.

Es gilt die übliche Herstellergarantie.

Performance

Testbedingungen

Wir haben Windows in den Modus "Performance" versetzt, bevor wir die folgenden Benchmarks durchgeführt haben.

Prozessor

Die rohe CPU-Leistung ist hervorragend und bietet sowohl eine konstante Turbo-Boost-Leistung als auch eine deutliche Steigerung um etwa 30 Prozent gegenüber der vorherigen Ryzen 7 8845HS Generation. Das Gleiche gilt auch für den Vergleich mit dem Core Ultra 9 185H der etwa 10 bis 15 Prozent langsamer ist als unser Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3253 (3218.02-3282.46)

Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2607 (2586.82-2626.57)

Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H: Ø851 (845.25-856.84)

MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U: Ø971 (535.59-1039.66)

GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H: Ø1902 (1827.4-1965.8)

Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2588 (2519.69-2910.57)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	90.6 pt
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	77 pt
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	75.6 pt
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	70.4 pt
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	68.8 pt
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	67.9 pt
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	67.2 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	67 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	66.8 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	58.9 pt
GMK NucBox K9 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	57.1 pt
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	56.6 pt
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	55.2 pt
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	51.1 pt
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	50.7 pt
Beelink SEi11 Pro ^-2! Intel Core i5-11320H	35.4 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	31070 Points +42%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	21897 (21441.9^min - 21897.4^max) Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (10435 - 23786, n=15)	19869 Points -9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	17615 Points -20%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	17128 Points -22%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16661 (16363.9^min - 16661^max) Points -24%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	16123 (15200.9^min - 16122.9^max) Points -26%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	15947 (9378.75^min - 15947.3^max) Points -27%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	15516 Points -29%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	14099 Points -36%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	12989 (12625.3^min - 12989.4^max) Points -41%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11997 Points -45%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	11790 Points -46%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	10418 (10142.8^min - 10418^max) Points -52%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	7226 (6983.97^min - 7226.42^max) Points -67%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	5720 (5681.08^min - 5720.38^max) Points -74%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	2212 Points +9%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2035 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1953 - 2049, n=8)	2009 Points -1%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	1878 Points -8%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	1838 Points -10%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	1817 Points -11%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	1808 Points -11%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1783 Points -12%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1770 Points -13%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1764 Points -13%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1735 Points -15%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1719 Points -16%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1718 Points -16%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1643 Points -19%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	1486 Points -27%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	1467 Points -28%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	11291 Points +31%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	8605 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6469 - 9246, n=7)	8515 Points -1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6997 Points -19%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	6736 Points -22%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6431 Points -25%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6349 Points -26%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6250 Points -27%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	6153 Points -28%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5448 Points -37%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	4948 Points -42%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	4935 Points -43%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	4319 Points -50%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	4106 Points -52%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	2821 Points -67%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	2208 Points -74%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	846 Points +7%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	793 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (772 - 804, n=7)	789 Points -1%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	718 Points -9%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	706 Points -11%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	705 Points -11%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	703 Points -11%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	702 Points -11%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	698 Points -12%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	688 Points -13%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	682 Points -14%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	664 Points -16%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	649 Points -18%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	609 Points -23%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	584 Points -26%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	561 Points -29%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	4793 Points +46%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3282 (3218.02^min - 3282.46^max) Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2498 - 3498, n=7)	3275 Points 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2863 Points -13%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	2693 Points -18%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2627 (2586.82^min - 2626.57^max) Points -20%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2597 (2501.09^min - 2597.23^max) Points -21%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2537 (2510.2^min - 2537.27^max) Points -23%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	2521 Points -23%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2448 Points -25%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2280 Points -31%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	2022 Points -38%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1966 (1827.4^min - 1965.8^max) Points -40%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	1737 (1708.16^min - 1737.02^max) Points -47%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	1040 (535.59^min - 1039.66^max) Points -68%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	857 (845.25^min - 856.84^max) Points -74%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	315 Points 0%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	315 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (298 - 315, n=7)	306 Points -3%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	286 Points -9%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	284 Points -10%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	283 Points -10%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	280 Points -11%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	275 Points -13%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	262 Points -17%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	258 Points -18%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	252 Points -20%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	251 Points -20%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	245 Points -22%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	243 Points -23%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	234 Points -26%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	214 Points -32%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	541 Seconds * -266%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	451 Seconds * -205%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	293 Seconds * -98%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	288 Seconds * -95%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	261 Seconds * -76%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	248 Seconds * -68%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	248 Seconds * -68%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	206 Seconds * -39%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	199 Seconds * -34%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	196 Seconds * -32%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	191 Seconds * -29%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	186 Seconds * -26%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	184 Seconds * -24%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (140 - 192, n=7)	154.3 Seconds * -4%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	148 Seconds *
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	131 Seconds * +11%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	101652 MIPS +25%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	81175 MIPS
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (67615 - 83572, n=7)	79123 MIPS -3%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	75427 MIPS -7%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	70937 MIPS -13%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	70782 MIPS -13%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	70417 MIPS -13%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	69720 MIPS -14%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	66557 MIPS -18%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	56068 MIPS -31%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	55271 MIPS -32%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	49353 MIPS -39%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	45820 MIPS -44%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	31447 MIPS -61%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	24798 MIPS -69%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	7276 MIPS +17%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6714 MIPS +8%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	6691 MIPS +8%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6676 MIPS +8%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	6665 MIPS +7%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6602 MIPS +6%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6208 MIPS
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6063 - 6208, n=7)	6137 MIPS -1%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	5980 MIPS -4%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	5898 MIPS -5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	5828 MIPS -6%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	5720 MIPS -8%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5713 MIPS -8%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	5105 MIPS -18%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5004 MIPS -19%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4795 MIPS -23%

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	15962 Points +6%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15043 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13648 - 15367, n=8)	14838 Points -1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13848 Points -8%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	13741 Points -9%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13362 Points -11%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13326 Points -11%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13184 Points -12%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	13162 Points -13%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11782 Points -22%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11541 Points -23%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	11087 Points -26%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	9240 Points -39%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	9225 Points -39%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	8756 Points -42%

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	3022 Points +6%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2863 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2785 - 2884, n=8)	2854 Points 0%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	2711 Points -5%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2694 Points -6%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2687 Points -6%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	2651 Points -7%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	2646 Points -8%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2640 Points -8%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	2546 Points -11%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2465 Points -14%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2415 Points -16%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2297 Points -20%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2218 Points -23%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	2042 Points -29%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	17395 Points +22%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	14301 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (12487 - 15012, n=7)	14252 Points 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13566 Points -5%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	12618 Points -12%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12196 Points -15%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12116 Points -15%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	11980 Points -16%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11769 Points -18%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11536 Points -19%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11449 Points -20%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10025 Points -30%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	9122 Points -36%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	8195 Points -43%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	7788 Points -46%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	4959 Points -65%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	2140 Points +9%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1957 - 2108, n=7)	2053 Points +5%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	2012 Points +3%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2004 Points +2%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	1994 Points +2%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1986 Points +1%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1957 Points
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1928 Points -1%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	1910 Points -2%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	1838 Points -6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1743 Points -11%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1708 Points -13%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1668 Points -15%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1578 Points -19%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	1518 Points -22%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	1513 Points -23%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	31.6 fps +21%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	26.1 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 26.9, n=7)	24.5 fps -6%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	22.3 fps -15%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21.1 fps -19%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	20.6 fps -21%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20.5 fps -21%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20.3 fps -22%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	19.7 fps -25%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15.7 fps -40%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	14.7 fps -44%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	13.9 fps -47%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	13.8 fps -47%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	12.7 fps -51%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	8.57 fps -67%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	7.28 fps -72%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	63.2 s * -22%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (49.6 - 58.5, n=7)	53.5 s * -4%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	52.4 s * -2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	51.8 s * -0%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	51.6 s *
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	49.8 s * +3%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	49.1 s * +5%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	48.4 s * +6%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	47.4 s * +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	46.8 s * +9%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	46.1 s * +11%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	45.5 s * +12%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	44.1 s * +15%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	44 s * +15%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	38.2 s * +26%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	37.9 s * +27%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H	0.581 sec * -43%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.522 sec * -29%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	0.4995 sec * -23%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	0.4898 sec * -21%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4693 sec * -16%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	0.4576 sec * -13%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	0.4504 sec * -11%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T	0.4457 sec * -10%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U	0.4438 sec * -9%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4418 sec * -9%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4343 sec * -7%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4336 sec * -7%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	0.4285 sec * -6%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0.4041 - 0.4257, n=7)	0.4123 sec * -2%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.406 sec *
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900	0.3803 sec * +6%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

3282 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

304 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

315 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

8605 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

793 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

21897 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2035 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

115.5 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

1100 Points

Hilfe

... im Vergleich

Performance Rating
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	93.3 pt
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	91.2 pt
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	84.5 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	62.8 pt
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	52.2 pt
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32.1 pt
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	30.9 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	34743 KRay/s
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37654, n=6)	33870 KRay/s -3%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	26305 KRay/s -24%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	15589 KRay/s -55%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	10755 KRay/s -69%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7047 KRay/s -80%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6306 KRay/s -82%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (97073 - 147937, n=7)	132633 Points 0%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	132394 Points
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	111508 Points -16%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	80501 Points -39%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	58422 Points -56%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32582 Points -75%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	29972 Points -77%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	5656 MB/s
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5843, n=7)	5498 MB/s -3%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4933 MB/s -13%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	3909 MB/s -31%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	2922 MB/s -48%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1992 MB/s -65%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1656 MB/s -71%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	115546 Points +17%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	99023 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	94503 Points -5%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84460 - 99023, n=7)	93036 Points -6%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	78797 Points -20%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62280 Points -37%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48212 Points -51%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	18959 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19021, n=7)	18508 Points -2%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	15420 Points -19%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	10406 Points -45%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	7780 Points -59%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4771 Points -75%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4387 Points -77%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	70450 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (51277 - 79251, n=6)	69376 Points -2%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	59522 Points -16%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	39506 Points -44%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	27972 Points -60%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	17987 Points -74%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	16042 Points -77%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	172642 MB/s +112%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	108402 MB/s +33%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	81324 MB/s
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (68042 - 81929, n=7)	78633 MB/s -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	75293 MB/s -7%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	68683 MB/s -16%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	33007 MB/s -59%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	1444 MB/s
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1086 - 1520, n=7)	1421 MB/s -2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	1155 MB/s -20%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1073 MB/s -26%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	844 MB/s -42%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	491 MB/s -66%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	368 MB/s -75%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	18694 KRay/s
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13959 - 20608, n=7)	18523 KRay/s -1%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	14041 KRay/s -25%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	8272 KRay/s -56%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	5657 KRay/s -70%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3811 KRay/s -80%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3417 KRay/s -82%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	48813 MPixel/s
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37747 - 50118, n=7)	47587 MPixel/s -3%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	46296 MPixel/s -5%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	45293 MPixel/s -7%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	40489 MPixel/s -17%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	37889 MPixel/s -22%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	25964 MPixel/s -47%

Systemperformance

Die PCMark 10 Ergebnisse gehören zu den besten aller Mini-PCs mit integrierter Grafik

PCMark 10 / Score
Beelink SER8 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	7641 Points 0%
Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	7613 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (7487 - 7646, n=3)	7582 Points 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	7103 Points -7%
GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	6463 Points -15%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	6080 Points -20%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	5095 Points -33%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Beelink SER8 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	11570 Points +8%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10856 Points +2%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (10678 - 10918, n=3)	10760 Points +1%
GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	10697 Points 0%
Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10684 Points
Beelink SEi11 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	10281 Points -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	10135 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Beelink SER8 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10457 Points +7%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9812 - 10615, n=3)	10257 Points +5%
Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	9812 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	9058 Points -8%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	8387 Points -15%
GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	7659 Points -22%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	6915 Points -30%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	11422 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9828 - 11422, n=3)	10744 Points -6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	10593 Points -7%
Beelink SER8 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10009 Points -12%
GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	8940 Points -22%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	6701 Points -41%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	5048 Points -56%

CrossMark / Overall
Beelink SER8 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1875 Points +11%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1734 Points +2%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1692 - 1749, n=2)	1721 Points +2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	1713 Points +1%
Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1692 Points
GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	1633 Points -3%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	1335 Points -21%

CrossMark / Productivity
Beelink SER8 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1802 Points +13%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1778 Points +12%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1588 - 1625, n=2)	1607 Points +1%
GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	1594 Points 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	1591 Points 0%
Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1588 Points
Beelink SEi11 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	1419 Points -11%

CrossMark / Creativity
Beelink SER8 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2009 Points +8%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	1984 Points +6%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1868 - 2029, n=2)	1949 Points +4%
Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1868 Points
GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	1714 Points -8%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1708 Points -9%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	1256 Points -33%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Beelink SER8 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1718 Points +13%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1685 Points +11%
GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	1520 Points 0%
Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1520 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1398 - 1520, n=2)	1459 Points -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	1378 Points -9%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	1336 Points -12%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Beelink SER8 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	334 Points +17%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	311 Points +9%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (286 - 321, n=2)	304 Points +6%
Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	286 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	268 Points -6%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	264 Points -8%
GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	262 Points -8%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	271 Points +17%
Beelink SER8 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	266 Points +15%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (231 - 266, n=3)	252 Points +9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	248 Points +7%
GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	231 Points 0%
Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	231 Points
Beelink SEi11 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	206 Points -11%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Beelink SEi11 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	663 ms * -49%
GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	566 ms * -27%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU	528 ms * -19%
Beelink SER8 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	501 ms * -13%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	489 ms * -10%
Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	445 ms *
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (433 - 445, n=4)	438 ms * +2%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

PCMark 10 Score		7613 Punkte
Hilfe

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (89287 - 92030, n=7)	89967 MB/s +1%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	89287 MB/s
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	69929 MB/s -22%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	68283 MB/s -24%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	67482 MB/s -24%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59609 MB/s -33%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	41106 MB/s -54%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98398 - 100903, n=7)	99935 MB/s +2%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	98398 MB/s
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	76074 MB/s -23%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	70520 MB/s -28%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	68780 MB/s -30%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	61976 MB/s -37%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	46516 MB/s -53%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98583 - 108954, n=7)	100651 MB/s +2%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	98583 MB/s
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	85464 MB/s -13%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	72287 MB/s -27%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	71218 MB/s -28%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	60626 MB/s -39%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	46760 MB/s -53%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	140.2 ns * -22%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	121.4 ns * -5%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	115.2 ns *
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (111.4 - 119.4, n=7)	114.6 ns * +1%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	88.9 ns * +23%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	81 ns * +30%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	74.5 ns * +35%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

DPC-Latenzzeit

Die 4K-Videowiedergabe bei 60 FPS ist leider unvollkommen, denn über einen Zeitraum von 60 Sekunden wurden 10 unterbrochene Bilder aufgezeichnet. Im Vergleich dazu gibt es bei den meisten Intel-Mini-PCs wie dem MSI Cubi NUC 1M überhaupt keine Bildaussetzer.

LatencyMon ist nicht mit der Strix Point CPU kompatibel.

Speichergeräte

Das System wird mit dem gleichen CT1000P3PSSD8 PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD, die auch auf der SER8 zu finden ist, ausgestattet. Die Übertragungsraten sind mit ~4500 MB/s im Vergleich zu ~5000 MB/s bei der SER8 etwas langsamer.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5189 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2247 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 657.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 335.4 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3030 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2236 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 73.38 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 233.3 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	83.4 pt
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	63.5 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	63 pt
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	60.3 pt
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	56.3 pt
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	37.2 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4128 (4092.8^min - 4128.38^max) MB/s +83%
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	3783 (3597.81^min - 3782.84^max) MB/s +68%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	3706 (3594.04^min - 3706.37^max) MB/s +64%
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3106 (3062.47^min - 3106.43^max) MB/s +38%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2257 (2254.02^min - 2257.37^max) MB/s
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	1638 (1628.34^min - 1637.59^max) MB/s -27%
seq write
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	5556 (1352.45^min - 5556.19^max) MB/s +197%
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4604 (4532.99^min - 4603.88^max) MB/s +146%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3215 (3133.8^min - 3214.8^max) MB/s +72%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	2928 (1958.53^min - 2927.62^max) MB/s +56%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1873 (688.38^min - 1873.41^max) MB/s
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	1661 (336.85^min - 1661.33^max) MB/s -11%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	7110 (6058.21^min - 7110.02^max) MB/s +53%
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	7066 (6607.49^min - 7066.35^max) MB/s +52%
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	5195 (4594.02^min - 5195.39^max) MB/s +12%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4987 (4558.37^min - 4987.33^max) MB/s +7%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4658 (3456.11^min - 4657.77^max) MB/s
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	2374 (2218.75^min - 2374.19^max) MB/s -49%
seq q8 t1 write
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	6647 (1260.59^min - 6647.13^max) MB/s +225%
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4725 (4657.36^min - 4724.88^max) MB/s +131%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	4712 (3064.99^min - 4711.88^max) MB/s +130%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3308 (3211.45^min - 3307.84^max) MB/s +62%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2047 (794.1^min - 2047.34^max) MB/s
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	1433 (67.32^min - 1432.98^max) MB/s -30%
4k q1 t1 read
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	79.7 (77.93^min - 79.74^max) MB/s +48%
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	79.5 (78.92^min - 79.5^max) MB/s +48%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	73.3 (72.01^min - 73.31^max) MB/s +36%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	53.7 (52.17^min - 53.71^max) MB/s
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	53.4 (49.89^min - 53.35^max) MB/s -1%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	50.5 (48.13^min - 50.48^max) MB/s -6%
4k q1 t1 write
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	289 (283.17^min - 289.07^max) MB/s +22%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	282 (265.11^min - 281.58^max) MB/s +19%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	236 (212.83^min - 235.59^max) MB/s
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	205 (173.87^min - 205.2^max) MB/s -13%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	173.6 (113.3^min - 173.62^max) MB/s -26%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	83.1 (75.3^min - 83.11^max) MB/s -65%
4k q32 t16 read
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3162 (3155.7^min - 3161.51^max) MB/s
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3139 (3067^min - 3138.94^max) MB/s -1%
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	2243 (1941.91^min - 2243.48^max) MB/s -29%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1533 (1419.74^min - 1533.25^max) MB/s -52%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	745 (742.2^min - 744.53^max) MB/s -76%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	731 (660.89^min - 731.29^max) MB/s -77%
4k q32 t16 write
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4288 (4275.2^min - 4287.55^max) MB/s +141%
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	3232 (3002.64^min - 3232.41^max) MB/s +81%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2010 (1622.95^min - 2010.14^max) MB/s +13%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1782 (864.63^min - 1781.78^max) MB/s
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	733 (332^min - 733.18^max) MB/s -59%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	186.7 (155.05^min - 186.74^max) MB/s -90%

AS SSD
Score Total
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	7509 Points +54%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	5131 Points +5%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4872 Points
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2750 Points -44%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	2742 Points -44%
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2646 Points -46%
Score Read
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	3258 Points +116%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1511 Points
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1443 Points -5%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	1275 Points -16%
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1108 Points -27%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	975 Points -35%
Score Write
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	3313 Points +23%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2688 Points
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	2593 Points -4%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	1282 Points -52%
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1057 Points -61%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	651 Points -76%
Seq Read
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	5766.47 MB/s +52%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	5158 MB/s +36%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4327.67 MB/s +14%
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3913.46 MB/s +3%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3789.22 MB/s
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	2246.84 MB/s -41%
Seq Write
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	5653.88 MB/s +237%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	2646 MB/s +58%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2606.84 MB/s +55%
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1944.73 MB/s +16%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	1764.26 MB/s +5%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1679.72 MB/s
4K Read
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	67.66 MB/s +47%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	63.6 MB/s +38%
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	51.6 MB/s +12%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	46.12 MB/s
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	44.12 MB/s -4%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	42.24 MB/s -8%
4K Write
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	219.64 MB/s
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	219.02 MB/s 0%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	217.48 MB/s -1%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	192.62 MB/s -12%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	169.5 MB/s -23%
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	148.58 MB/s -32%
4K-64 Read
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	2614.06 MB/s +141%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1086.32 MB/s
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	967.82 MB/s -11%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	706.35 MB/s -35%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	695 MB/s -36%
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	664.76 MB/s -39%
4K-64 Write
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	2878 MB/s +25%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2300.17 MB/s
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	1879.53 MB/s -18%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	912.72 MB/s -60%
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	643.31 MB/s -72%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	172.85 MB/s -92%
Access Time Read
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.077 ms * -26%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.072 ms * -18%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.061 ms *
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	0.06 ms * +2%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	0.053 ms * +13%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	0.053 ms * +13%
Access Time Write
Beelink SEi11 Pro Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	0.342 ms * -272%
GMK NucBox K9 MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	0.195 ms * -112%
Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.092 ms *
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.088 ms * +4%
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.075 ms * +18%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	0.043 ms * +53%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Beelink SER9 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4560 (4050.44-4915.49)

Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5188 (4957.94-5197.46)

GPU Performance

Die Grafikleistung ist eine der schnellsten aller Mini-PCs mit integrierter Grafik. Unser Radeon 890M übertrifft den konkurrierenden Arc 8 oder Arc 140V in Spielen durchweg. AMD hat auch die Treiber aktualisiert, um die Leistungsprobleme zu beheben, die wir bei DOTA 2 Reborn erlebt haben.

Leider brachen die Bildraten beim Spielen regelmäßig ein. Im Leerlauf von Cyberpunk 2077 mit 1080p Ultra-Einstellungen sanken die Frameraten beispielsweise gelegentlich von 25 auf 22, anstatt konstant bei 25 zu bleiben.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Beelink SER9 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	100 pt
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M	96.3 pt
BOSGAME M1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	89.7 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	88.6 pt
Beelink SER8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	85.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE NVIDIA T1000, Intel Core i9-14900	84.4 pt
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	83.9 pt
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	82.2 pt
GMK NucBox K6 ^-1! AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	82 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	81.7 pt
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	74.2 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	52.1 pt
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	48 pt
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U	44 pt
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i5-11320H	42.5 pt
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-14500T	23.9 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Beelink SER9 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	16800 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (13345 - 16800, n=5)	15551 Points -7%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	14249 Points -15%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13716 Points -18%
Beelink SER8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13673 Points -19%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	13281 Points -21%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	13248 Points -21%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13163 Points -22%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11902 Points -29%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE NVIDIA T1000, Intel Core i9-14900	11793 Points -30%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10737 Points -36%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	7428 Points -56%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	7184 Points -57%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i5-11320H	6571 Points -61%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U	6282 Points -63%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-14500T	3422 Points -80%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Beelink SER9 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	55908 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (53940 - 58319, n=4)	55718 Points 0%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	53972 Points -3%
Beelink SER8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	53347 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE NVIDIA T1000, Intel Core i9-14900	50553 Points -10%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	48717 Points -13%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	48166 Points -14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	47040 Points -16%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45726 Points -18%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	39695 Points -29%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	34469 Points -38%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	31849 Points -43%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U	29301 Points -48%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i5-11320H	26093 Points -53%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-14500T	16983 Points -70%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Beelink SER9 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	10037 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (8188 - 10037, n=5)	9114 Points -9%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8816 Points -12%
Beelink SER8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8572 Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE NVIDIA T1000, Intel Core i9-14900	8450 Points -16%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	8396 Points -16%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8260 Points -18%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8164 Points -19%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	8117 Points -19%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	8061 Points -20%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	7325 Points -27%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	5845 Points -42%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	4984 Points -50%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U	4899 Points -51%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i5-11320H	4523 Points -55%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-14500T	2655 Points -74%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Beelink SER9 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3546 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (3421 - 3676, n=6)	3525 Points -1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3476 Points -2%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3269 Points -8%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3178 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE NVIDIA T1000, Intel Core i9-14900	3088 Points -13%
Beelink SER8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2917 Points -18%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2906 Points -18%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	2890 Points -18%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2881 Points -19%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	2852 Points -20%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1682 Points -53%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	1582 Points -55%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i5-11320H	1443 Points -59%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U	1428 Points -60%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-14500T	731 Points -79%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Beelink SER9 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3917 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (3768 - 4073, n=5)	3889 Points -1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3881 Points -1%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3621 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE NVIDIA T1000, Intel Core i9-14900	3534 Points -10%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3517 Points -10%
Beelink SER8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3274 Points -16%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3260 Points -17%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	3254 Points -17%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	3206 Points -18%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3200 Points -18%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1920 Points -51%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	1793 Points -54%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i5-11320H	1612 Points -59%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U	1602 Points -59%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-14500T	847 Points -78%

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 Performance		15873 Punkte
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		39590 Punkte
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9188 Punkte
3DMark Time Spy Score		3917 Punkte
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		502 Punkte
Hilfe

... im Vergleich

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE NVIDIA T1000, Intel Core i9-14900	159 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE NVIDIA T1000, Intel Core i9-14900	159 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i5-11320H	995 Seconds * -334%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U	829 Seconds * -262%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-14500T	513 Seconds * -124%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	497 Seconds * -117%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	448 Seconds * -96%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	435 Seconds * -90%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	327 Seconds * -43%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H	326 Seconds * -42%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	326 Seconds * -42%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	319 Seconds * -39%
Beelink SER8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	310 Seconds * -35%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8700G	300 Seconds * -31%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE NVIDIA T1000, Intel Core i9-14900	263 Seconds * -15%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (229 - 306, n=4)	258 Seconds * -13%
Beelink SER9 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	229 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	308 Seconds *
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	225 Seconds *
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	215 Seconds *

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Performance Rating - Percent
Beelink SER9 ^-1! AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	99.9 pt
Beelink SER8 ^-1! AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	90.3 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	71.1 pt
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	70 pt
Beelink SEi11 Pro ^-3! Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	51.7 pt
MSI Cubi NUC 1M ^-2! Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	45 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	25.5 (20.9^min) fps
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	23.4 (19^min) fps -8%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	19.6 (16.7^min) fps -23%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	18.8 (10.9^min) fps -26%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.46 (7.99^min) fps -63%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28 fps
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	23.1 fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	21.5 (13.6^min, 13.7^P0.1, 14.1^P1) fps

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	31.5 (3.06^min, 21.7^P1) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	16.6 (2.85^min, 11.4^P1) fps -47%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	12.7 (2.89^min, 8.93^P1) fps -60%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.98 (4.2^min, 6.21^P1) fps -68%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	33.3 fps
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.4 fps -12%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	25.3 fps -24%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	22.3 fps -33%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.6 fps -50%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.9 fps -55%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	59.7 (43.6^min, 46.2^P1) fps
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	50.8 (24.5^min, 33.9^P1) fps -15%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	43.5 (8.2^min, 17.8^P1) fps -27%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.2 (5.3^min, 6.89^P1) fps -58%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22.2 (5.6^min, 7.76^P1) fps -63%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	90.4 (71.8^min) fps +1%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	89.8 (79.5^min) fps
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	73.3 (48.5^min) fps -18%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	72.9 (47.2^min) fps -19%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	57.8 (39.9^min) fps -36%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	47.4 (40.8^min) fps -47%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	51.6 fps
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	39.6 fps -23%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37.3 fps -28%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	37.3 fps -28%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	32.9 fps -36%

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12)
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (170.3 - 172.1, n=2)	171.2 fps +1%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	170.3 fps
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	142.1 fps -17%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	139.9 fps -18%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	139 fps -18%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	127.9 fps -25%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	89 fps -48%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	80.8 fps -53%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37.9 fps -78%
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12)
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	88.3 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (86.9 - 88.3, n=2)	87.6 fps -1%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	77.7 fps -12%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	74.6 fps -16%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	72.8 fps -18%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	69.2 fps -22%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	50.7 fps -43%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	40 fps -55%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	27.5 fps -69%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12)
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	62.3 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (62.1 - 62.3, n=2)	62.2 fps 0%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	55.9 fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	55.6 fps -11%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	52.8 fps -15%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	52.2 fps -16%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	39.4 fps -37%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	31.3 fps -50%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	20.3 fps -67%
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12)
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	41.8 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (41.2 - 41.8, n=2)	41.5 fps -1%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	37.9 fps -9%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	36.8 fps -12%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	36.6 fps -12%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	35.3 fps -16%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	26.8 fps -36%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	20.5 fps -51%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14 fps -67%
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12)
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (32.5 - 34.1, n=2)	33.3 fps +2%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	32.5 fps
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.3 fps -7%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.6 fps -9%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.5 fps -9%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	27.6 fps -15%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	22.4 fps -31%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	15.6 fps -52%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.9 fps -66%

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	187.4 (1.697^min, 200^P1) fps +13%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	169.4 (3.69^min, 125^P1) fps +2%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	166.1 (4.25^min, 100^P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (157.8 - 174.3, n=7)	166 fps 0%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	164.1 (4.56^min, 100^P1) fps -1%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	163.4 (2.4^min, 100^P1) fps -2%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	162.9 (3.78^min, 111.1^P1) fps -2%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	145.4 (4.75^min, 83.3^P1) fps -12%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	143.6 (5.11^min, 83.3^P1) fps -14%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	123.5 (30.5^min, 66.7^P1) fps -26%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	100.3 (39.9^min, 62.5^P1) fps -40%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	95 (19.9^min, 62.5^P1) fps -43%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	94.2 (16.5^min, 58.8^P1) fps -43%
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	187.3 (4.93^min, 166.7^P1) fps +24%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	150.9 (4.46^min, 100^P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (146.6 - 150.9, n=3)	149.3 fps -1%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	129.3 (19.9^min, 90.9^P1) fps -14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	124.8 (38.5^min, 83.3^P1) fps -17%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	124.7 (11.8^min, 83.3^P1) fps -17%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	121.4 (39.2^min, 83.3^P1) fps -20%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	119.9 (4.07^min, 76.9^P1) fps -21%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	118.7 (7.47^min, 83.3^P1) fps -21%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	91.3 (21.4^min, 52.6^P1) fps -39%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	78.6 (26^min, 50^P1) fps -48%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	65.9 (13.2^min, 45.5^P1) fps -56%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	50.2 (16.7^min, 38.5^P1) fps -67%
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	187.1 (1.566^min, 200^P1) fps +18%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	158.9 (4.43^min, 100^P1) fps
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	158.3 (4.14^min, 111.1^P1) fps 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	154.1 (4.46^min, 100^P1) fps -3%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	153.8 (4.97^min, 90.9^P1) fps -3%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (129.6 - 161.5, n=6)	153 fps -4%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	152.6 (5.62^min, 100^P1) fps -4%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	131.5 (4.53^min, 47.6^P1) fps -17%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	125.5 (15.3^min, 76.9^P1) fps -21%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	105.9 (23.9^min, 47.6^P1) fps -33%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	86.1 (7.7^min, 50^P1) fps -46%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	84.7 (20.1^min, 58.8^P1) fps -47%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	77.6 (21.9^min, 50^P1) fps -51%
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	185.8 (1.693^min, 142.9^P1) fps +28%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	145.5 (4.84^min, 90.9^P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (143.2 - 146.1, n=3)	144.9 fps 0%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	132.3 (12^min, 90.9^P1) fps -9%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	128.7 (21.5^min, 76.9^P1) fps -12%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	124 (11.3^min, 83.3^P1) fps -15%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	112.9 (17.1^min, 76.9^P1) fps -22%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	109.8 (7.83^min, 50^P1) fps -25%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	95.2 (10.5^min, 66.7^P1) fps -35%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	78.5 (6.01^min, 40^P1) fps -46%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	71 (6.44^min, 40^P1) fps -51%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	57.3 (22.2^min, 38.5^P1) fps -61%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	50.5 (10.2^min, 37^P1) fps -65%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	103.5 (6.88^min, 76.9^P1) fps +31%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	79 (9.77^min, 52.6^P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (68.4 - 80.2, n=7)	76.9 fps -3%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	65.9 (2.44^min, 41.7^P1) fps -17%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	65.7 (3.85^min, 40^P1) fps -17%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	61.9 (2.97^min, 41.7^P1) fps -22%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	40.6 (3.3^min, 30.3^P1) fps -49%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35.9 (2.99^min, 27^P1) fps -55%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	33.6 (6.68^min, 22.7^P1) fps -57%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	23.6 (8.96^min, 17.2^P1) fps -70%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	23.2 (11.5^min, 15.9^P1) fps -71%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22.1 (7.08^min, 16.4^P1) fps -72%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	12 (4.17^min, 9.17^P1) fps -85%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	50.2 (6.23^min, 34.5^P1) fps +59%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (30.4 - 32.4, n=7)	31.6 fps 0%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	31.5 (3.06^min, 21.7^P1) fps
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	27.7 (13.2^min, 18.2^P1) fps -12%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26 (2.62^min, 17.5^P1) fps -17%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	24.6 (1.758^min, 16.9^P1) fps -22%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	15.8 (3.06^min, 12^P1) fps -50%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	13.9 (2.71^min, 10.6^P1) fps -56%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	12.7 (2.89^min, 8.93^P1) fps -60%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.98 (4.2^min, 6.21^P1) fps -68%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9 (3.72^min, 7.14^P1) fps -71%

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	246.2 (207.1^min) fps +40%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	175.6 (150.3^min) fps
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	164.8 (145.3^min) fps -6%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (154.3 - 175.6, n=7)	163.9 fps -7%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	161.2 (11.9^min) fps -8%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	159.5 (137.7^min) fps -9%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	157.5 (136^min) fps -10%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	151.9 (101.9^min) fps -13%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	144.9 (123.5^min) fps -17%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	119.6 (108.4^min) fps -32%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	117.2 (74.5^min) fps -33%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	104.7 (61.7^min) fps -40%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	102.4 (80.7^min) fps -42%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	101.5 (54.9^min) fps -42%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	97.7 (67.3^min) fps -44%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	97.7 (57.3^min) fps -44%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	217.7 (183.7^min) fps +63%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	133.6 (115.4^min) fps
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	130.2 (106.6^min) fps -3%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	130.1 (91.5^min) fps -3%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (121.4 - 135.7, n=7)	129.9 fps -3%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	126.5 (104.4^min) fps -5%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	124.8 (104.5^min) fps -7%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	116.1 (93.2^min) fps -13%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	107.9 (92.8^min) fps -19%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	83.1 (60.5^min) fps -38%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	82.9 (52.4^min) fps -38%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	78.6 (66.2^min) fps -41%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	78 (58.5^min) fps -42%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	74.4 (58.9^min) fps -44%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	61.9 (45.9^min) fps -54%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	54.2 (30.3^min) fps -59%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	150.4 (134.4^min) fps +50%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	100 (89^min) fps
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	98.8 (88.1^min) fps -1%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	98.8 (80.5^min) fps -1%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	96.8 (17.4^min) fps -3%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	95.9 (85.7^min) fps -4%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	88 (69.2^min) fps -12%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	75.6 (48.6^min) fps -24%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	72.5 (53^min) fps -27%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	70 (63.6^min) fps -30%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	62.5 (42.1^min) fps -37%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	54.8 (35.3^min) fps -45%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	50.4 (41.9^min) fps -50%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (34.8 - 100, n=7)	48.1 fps -52%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	47 (29^min) fps -53%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	38 (35.3^min) fps -62%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	136.5 (120.3^min) fps +52%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	90.4 (71.8^min) fps +1%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	89.8 (79.5^min) fps
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	88.5 (78.9^min) fps -1%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	87.4 (16.1^min) fps -3%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	86.5 (77.2^min) fps -4%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	81.2 (64.4^min) fps -10%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	76 (33.1^min) fps -15%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	73.3 (48.5^min) fps -18%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	66.5 (50.4^min) fps -26%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	60.8 (54.4^min) fps -32%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	57.8 (39.9^min) fps -36%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	47.4 (40.8^min) fps -47%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (32.4 - 89.8, n=7)	44.7 fps -50%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	41.8 (27.6^min) fps -53%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	35.4 (33.1^min) fps -61%

Strange Brigade
1280x720 lowest AF:1
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	226 (39.2^min, 192.3^P1) fps +13%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	199.8 (147.5^min, 170.3^P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (165.1 - 199.8, n=7)	183.8 fps -8%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	175.9 (26.4^min, 151.8^P1) fps -12%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	173.7 (119.2^min, 145.2^P1) fps -13%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	167.7 (34.3^min, 142.9^P1) fps -16%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	148.6 (45.8^min, 118.4^P1) fps -26%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	120.2 (78.3^min, 104.5^P1) fps -40%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	88.2 (20^min, 29.9^P1) fps -56%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	79.3 (18.8^min, 25.6^P1) fps -60%
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	87.2 (73.7^min, 77^P1) fps +6%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	82 (48.6^min, 70.5^P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (71.1 - 82, n=7)	76.2 fps -7%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	70.9 (5^min, 61.9^P1) fps -14%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	68.9 (55.3^min, 59.1^P1) fps -16%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	67.9 (43.7^min, 58.3^P1) fps -17%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	63.9 (33.2^min, 54.3^P1) fps -22%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	43 (36.6^min, 37.4^P1) fps -48%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	38.9 (14.7^min, 28.5^P1) fps -53%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	33.9 (10.3^min, 19.8^P1) fps -59%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	69.8 (49.9^min, 54.1^P1) fps
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	69.4 (49.4^min, 53.4^P1) fps -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (59.7 - 69.8, n=7)	64.2 fps -8%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	60.6 (32.5^min, 47.4^P1) fps -13%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	58.7 (43.2^min, 45.6^P1) fps -16%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	57.9 (7^min, 45^P1) fps -17%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	53.5 (28.6^min, 42^P1) fps -23%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	35.9 (28.5^min, 29.1^P1) fps -49%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.1 (8.7^min, 16.3^P1) fps -55%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	27.7 (10^min, 15.1^P1) fps -60%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	59.9 (44.2^min, 47.8^P1) fps 0%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	59.7 (43.6^min, 46.2^P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (49.8 - 59.7, n=7)	54.7 fps -8%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	52.1 (5.2^min, 33.8^P1) fps -13%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	50.8 (24.5^min, 33.9^P1) fps -15%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	48.8 (11.1^min, 31.1^P1) fps -18%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	43.5 (8.2^min, 17.8^P1) fps -27%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	29.6 (21^min, 24.7^P1) fps -50%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.2 (5.3^min, 6.89^P1) fps -58%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22.2 (5.6^min, 7.76^P1) fps -63%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	101.3 fps +7%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	94.6 fps
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	84.5 fps -11%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (75.5 - 94.6, n=6)	83.4 fps -12%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	80.8 fps -15%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	79.7 fps -16%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	77.9 fps -18%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	75.8 fps -20%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	75.3 fps -20%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	64.8 fps -32%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	59.6 fps -37%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	48.3 fps -49%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	46 fps -51%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.9 fps -57%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	38.6 fps -59%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	24.2 fps -74%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	49.3 fps +4%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	47.5 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (37 - 47.5, n=6)	42.9 fps -10%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	40.9 fps -14%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	40.2 fps -15%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	40.2 fps -15%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	39.3 fps -17%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	38.8 fps -18%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	37.4 fps -21%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	37 fps -22%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	33.3 fps -30%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.7 fps -46%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	24.7 fps -48%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	23 fps -52%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	20.3 fps -57%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	12.9 fps -73%
1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	36.2 fps +9%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	33.3 fps
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.8 fps -8%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (26.6 - 33.3, n=6)	30.7 fps -8%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.4 fps -12%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.3 fps -12%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	28.6 fps -14%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	28.5 fps -14%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	27.6 fps -17%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	26.1 fps -22%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	22.3 fps -33%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.2 fps -45%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	17.9 fps -46%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.6 fps -50%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.9 fps -55%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	9.17 fps -72%

X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	211 fps +148%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	85.1 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (66.5 - 87, n=6)	77.6 fps -9%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	69.1 fps -19%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	65.9 fps -23%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	65.9 fps -23%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	65.5 fps -23%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	64.2 fps -25%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	64.2 fps -25%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	58.2 fps -32%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	57 fps -33%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	52.7 fps -38%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	51.8 fps -39%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	28.5 fps -67%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	145.8 fps +116%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	67.6 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (54.4 - 67.9, n=6)	60.8 fps -10%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	49.8 fps -26%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	48.9 fps -28%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	47.8 fps -29%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	47.3 fps -30%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	46.8 fps -31%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	46.3 fps -32%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	44.8 fps -34%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	41.2 fps -39%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	39.4 fps -42%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	38.5 fps -43%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	21.7 fps -68%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	130.1 fps +152%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	51.6 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (44 - 51.6, n=6)	47.3 fps -8%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	42.2 fps -18%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	41.5 fps -20%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	40.1 fps -22%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	39.7 fps -23%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	39.6 fps -23%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	38.7 fps -25%
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37.3 fps -28%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	37.3 fps -28%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	34.1 fps -34%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	33.2 fps -36%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	18.8 fps -64%

Far Cry 5
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	127 (102^min) fps +26%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	101 (84^min) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (75 - 101, n=7)	92 fps -9%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	89 (77^min) fps -12%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	88 (77^min) fps -13%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	86 (75^min) fps -15%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	71 (62^min) fps -30%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	71 (63^min) fps -30%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	49 (43^min) fps -51%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	62 (53^min) fps +3%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	60 (53^min) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (42 - 60, n=7)	54.9 fps -8%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	54 (48^min) fps -10%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	51 (45^min) fps -15%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49 (44^min) fps -18%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	40 (37^min) fps -33%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	33 (29^min) fps -45%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28 (24^min) fps -53%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	57 (48^min) fps +4%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	55 (48^min) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (39 - 55, n=7)	50.4 fps -8%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49 (43^min) fps -11%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	47 (42^min) fps -15%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	45 (41^min) fps -18%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	37 (34^min) fps -33%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	30 (26^min) fps -45%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	26 (22^min) fps -53%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	53 (46^min) fps +2%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	52 (46^min) fps
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	47 (41^min) fps -10%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (33 - 52, n=7)	46.1 fps -11%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	45 (40^min) fps -13%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	43 (38^min) fps -17%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	35 (32^min) fps -33%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	27 (20^min) fps -48%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24 (21^min) fps -54%

F1 22
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	186.8 (137^min, 123^P1) fps
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	186.7 (148^min, 125^P1) fps 0%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (178.8 - 186.8, n=2)	182.8 fps -2%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	170 (137^min, 113^P1) fps -9%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	145.7 (108^min, 89^P1) fps -22%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	130.2 (112^min, 96^P1) fps -30%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	107.3 (86^min, 79^P1) fps -43%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	71.8 (51^min, 58^P1) fps -62%
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	110.1 (87^min, 54^P1) fps
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	109.9 (95^min, 85^P1) fps 0%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (81 - 111.2, n=5)	104 fps -6%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	99.8 (12^min, 70^P1) fps -9%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	99 (86^min, 76^P1) fps -10%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	79.4 (63^min, 66^P1) fps -28%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	58.3 (43^min, 42^P1) fps -47%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	42.3 (35^min, 32^P1) fps -62%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	100.8 (78^min, 63^P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (76.8 - 102.9, n=5)	95.8 fps -5%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	95 (81^min, 76^P1) fps -6%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	85.9 (67^min, 59^P1) fps -15%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	85.9 (73^min, 68^P1) fps -15%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	71.9 (61^min, 59^P1) fps -29%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	52.3 (41^min, 39^P1) fps -48%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	38.2 (32^min, 31^P1) fps -62%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	76.8 (55^min, 44^P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (64.2 - 78.1, n=5)	74.1 fps -4%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	70.6 (60^min, 59^P1) fps -8%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	66.7 (53^min, 36^P1) fps -13%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	65.6 (54^min, 52^P1) fps -15%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	52.9 (46^min, 45^P1) fps -31%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	37.2 (31^min, 29^P1) fps -52%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.3 (24^min, 22^P1) fps -63%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	21.4 (17^min, 16^P1) fps +1%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	21.2 (12^min, 13^P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (16.7 - 22, n=5)	20.6 fps -3%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	19.2 (14^min, 14^P1) fps -9%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	18.4 (12^min, 12^P1) fps -13%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	17.9 (13^min, 13^P1) fps -16%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	8.43 (6^min, 6^P1) fps -60%

Baldur's Gate 3
1280x720 Low Preset
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	75.9 (36.6^min, 56^P0.1, 65.8^P1) fps +29%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	65.9 (33.4^min, 33.9^P0.1, 36.6^P1) fps +12%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	64.7 fps +10%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	63.4 fps +8%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (58.9 - 64.2, n=2)	61.6 fps +5%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	60.8 (21.6^min, 28.1^P0.1, 35.6^P1) fps +3%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	58.9 fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	56.4 (29^min, 30.5^P0.1, 37.9^P1) fps -4%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	50.8 fps -14%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	48.5 (16.6^min, 27.3^P0.1, 31.4^P1) fps -18%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	37.3 fps -37%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.2 (13.8^min, 15.1^P0.1, 19.8^P1) fps -52%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22.9 fps -61%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	14.4 (8.68^min, 9.6^P0.1, 11.1^P1) fps -76%
1920x1080 Low Preset
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	45 (22.4^min, 36.9^P0.1, 38.2^P1) fps +29%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	43.9 fps +25%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	42.5 (20.1^min, 21.1^P0.1, 35.7^P1) fps +21%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (35 - 47.1, n=7)	42.5 fps +21%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	41.6 fps +19%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	40.5 fps +16%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	38.5 (19.4^min, 19.8^P0.1, 29.1^P1) fps +10%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	37.9 (22.7^min, 23.2^P0.1, 26.9^P1) fps +8%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	35 fps
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	33.7 fps -4%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	32.9 (20.4^min, 20.8^P0.1, 22.7^P1) fps -6%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	22.9 fps -35%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	19.9 (15.5^min, 15.6^P0.1, 16.4^P1) fps -43%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	15.3 fps -56%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	8.87 (6.27^min, 6.29^P0.1, 6.74^P1) fps -75%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	36.8 fps +26%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	35.2 (20.6^min, 26.7^P0.1, 30.6^P1) fps +21%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	34.8 fps +20%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (29.1 - 37.9, n=7)	34.5 fps +19%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	33.7 fps +16%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	32.7 (16.3^min, 16.7^P0.1, 17.9^P1) fps +12%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	29.9 (11.8^min, 18.6^P0.1, 23.5^P1) fps +3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	29.7 (17.5^min, 18.4^P0.1, 19.7^P1) fps +2%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	29.1 fps
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	27.9 fps -4%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	25 (9.42^min, 11.3^P0.1, 16.1^P1) fps -14%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	15.4 (11.8^min, 11.9^P0.1, 12.7^P1) fps -47%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	15.1 fps -48%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	6.97 (5.1^min, 5.12^P0.1, 5.36^P1) fps -76%
1920x1080 High Preset
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	30.2 (10.5^min, 12.6^P0.1, 26.4^P1) fps +7%
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.9 fps +6%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.9 fps +2%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	28.2 fps
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.1 fps 0%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (24.1 - 31.2, n=7)	28.1 fps 0%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	27 (14^min, 14.4^P0.1, 22.7^P1) fps -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	25.2 (14.5^min, 14.6^P0.1, 16.2^P1) fps -11%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	24.5 (17.7^min, 17.7^P0.1, 19.8^P1) fps -13%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	24.2 fps -14%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	21.6 (11.7^min, 12.4^P0.1, 13.9^P1) fps -23%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	13.5 (11.2^min, 11.2^P0.1, 11.6^P1) fps -52%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	13.3 fps -53%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	6.12 (4.49^min, 4.52^P0.1, 4.8^P1) fps -78%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	29.5 (13.3^min, 21.5^P0.1, 25.7^P1) fps
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.2 fps
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (24 - 31.1, n=6)	27.9 fps
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27 fps
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	26 (13.8^min, 14.3^P0.1, 22.5^P1) fps
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	24.4 (8.81^min, 15.2^P0.1, 19.3^P1) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	24.4 (8.14^min, 11.8^P0.1, 15.7^P1) fps
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	23.1 fps
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	21 (12.8^min, 12.9^P0.1, 13.6^P1) fps
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	13 (10.1^min, 10.1^P0.1, 11^P1) fps
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	12.6 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR on)
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	33.3 (24.2^min) fps
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	31.6 (11.4^min) fps
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	82.2 (67.7^min) fps
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	80.6 (51.6^min) fps -2%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (76.7 - 82.2, n=2)	79.5 fps -3%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	77.4 (28.7^min) fps -6%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	77.1 (60.4^min) fps -6%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	72.6 (60.1^min) fps -12%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	69.1 (58.9^min) fps -16%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	69 (56.9^min) fps -16%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	50.5 (42.1^min) fps -39%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	48.5 (39.4^min) fps -41%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	46.4 (37.7^min) fps -44%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.8 (24.6^min) fps -61%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.5 (19.8^min) fps -69%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	15.4 (11.7^min) fps -81%
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	49.6 (42^min) fps
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	47.9 (37.5^min) fps -3%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (40 - 51.5, n=7)	46.7 fps -6%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	46.3 (32.3^min) fps -7%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	45.1 (36.7^min) fps -9%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	43.8 (37.3^min) fps -12%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	41.3 (34.5^min) fps -17%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	41 (35.2^min) fps -17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	34.7 (30.4^min) fps -30%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	33.9 (29.4^min) fps -32%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	30.9 (24.8^min) fps -38%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	24.3 (20.5^min) fps -51%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.6 (15.4^min) fps -62%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	15.4 (12.1^min) fps -69%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	8.82 (6.82^min) fps -82%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	40.5 (35.1^min) fps
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	37.5 (30.6^min) fps -7%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (31.3 - 40.7, n=7)	36.9 fps -9%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	35.2 (10.9^min) fps -13%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	34.5 (29.8^min) fps -15%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	34.2 (28.8^min) fps -16%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	33.4 (29.1^min) fps -18%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	31.8 (27.5^min) fps -21%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	28.9 (25.6^min) fps -29%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	28 (24.4^min) fps -31%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	25.2 (19.2^min) fps -38%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	18.1 (15.7^min) fps -55%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	15 (12.4^min) fps -63%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	12.4 (10.3^min) fps -69%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	6.75 (5.5^min) fps -83%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.6 (23.3^min) fps +3%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (25.4 - 31.6, n=7)	29 fps +1%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	28.7 (24.8^min) fps
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	28.3 (23.5^min) fps -1%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.7 (9.25^min) fps -3%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 (22.6^min) fps -6%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	26.7 (22.9^min) fps -7%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	25.8 (21.7^min) fps -10%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	24.1 (21.1^min) fps -16%
Khadas Mind 2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	24 (20.7^min) fps -16%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	21.3 (14.6^min) fps -26%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	13 (11^min) fps -55%
GMK NucBox M6 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M	11.6 (10^min) fps -60%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.8 (8.83^min) fps -62%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	5.86 (4.84^min) fps -80%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.8 (19.9^min) fps +1%
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	25.5 (20.9^min) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 890M (23.1 - 27.8, n=7)	25.5 fps 0%
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	24.5 (9.31^min) fps -4%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000	23.8 (20^min) fps -7%
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	23.4 (19^min) fps -8%
Minisforum MS-A1 AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M	23.4 (19.7^min) fps -8%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	22 (18.9^min) fps -14%
Geekom AX8 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, AMD Radeon 780M	21.7 (18.2^min) fps -15%
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	18.8 (10.9^min) fps -26%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.4 (9.68^min) fps -55%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.46 (7.99^min) fps -63%
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-937U0EA Intel Core i5-14500T, Intel UHD Graphics 770	5.03 (4.23^min) fps -80%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart

Beelink SER9 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M: Ø24.9 (21.6-25.9)

	min.	mittel	hoch	max.
GTA V (2015)	166.1	158.9	79	31.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	175.6	133.6	100	89.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	94.6	47.5	33.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	85.1	67.6	51.6
Far Cry 5 (2018)	101	60	55	52
Strange Brigade (2018)	199.8	82	69.8	59.7
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	88.3	62.3	41.8	32.5
F1 22 (2022)	110.1	100.8	76.8	21.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	35	29.1	28.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	49.6	40.5	28.7	25.5

Emissionen

Lautstärke

Die Lüftergeräusche und die Lautstärke sind sehr ähnlich zu denen, die wir beim letztjährigen SER8 gemessen haben. Das bedeutet, dass die zusätzliche Leistung der neueren Zen 5 CPU glücklicherweise nicht zu einem lauteren Mini-PC führt.

Lüftergeräuschprofil (Weiß: Hintergrund, Rot: System im Leerlauf, Blau: 3DMark 06, Orange: Cyberpunk 2077, Grün: Prime95+FurMark Stress)

Lautstärkediagramm

Idle		26.6 / 26.8 / 26.8 dB(A)
Last		33.4 / 33.8 dB(A)

	30 dB leise 40 dB(A) deutlich hörbar 50 dB(A) störend
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (aus 15 cm gemessen) Umgebungsgeräusche: 23.2 dB(A)

	Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	Beelink SER8 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	Beelink SEi11 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN	MSI Cubi NUC 1M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000	Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
Geräuschentwicklung		-5%	2%	-11%	-23%	-19%
aus / Umgebung *	23.2	23.6 -2%	22.8 2%	23.5 -1%	23 1%	24.6 -6%
Idle min *	26.6	28.8 -8%	24.7 7%	29.9 -12%	29.8 -12%	24.7 7%
Idle avg *	26.8	28.8 -7%	24.7 8%	29.9 -12%	35.7 -33%	29.6 -10%
Idle max *	26.8	30.5 -14%	25.3 6%	32 -19%	35.7 -33%	29.8 -11%
Last avg *	33.4	34.6 -4%	33.2 1%	33.5 -0%	41.9 -25%	45.7 -37%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	34.6	34.1 1%		39.1 -13%	43.8 -27%	47.7 -38%
Last max *	33.8	34.5 -2%	37.8 -12%	40.5 -20%	44 -30%	47.4 -40%
Witcher 3 ultra *			34.5

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Temperatur

Die Oberflächentemperaturen sind trotz der fehlenden Lüftungsgitter an den Seiten und Kanten kein Problem. Die Oberseite erreicht nur ~30 °C, wenn anspruchsvolle Lasten laufen, während das Netzteil über 40 °C warm werden kann.

Stresstest

Die CPU stabilisiert sich bei 3,3 GHz, 71 C und 54 W im Prime95-Stressbetrieb. Die Kerntemperatur stabilisiert sich bei Cyberpunk 2077 bei nur 68 °C im Vergleich zu 62 °C beim letztjährigen SER8.

	Durchschnittlicher CPU-Takt (GHz)	GPU-Takt (MHz)	Durchschnittliche CPU-Temperatur (°C)
System Leerlauf	--	--	31
Prime95 Stress	3.3	--	71
Prime95 + FurMark Stress	3.5	1598	71
Cyberpunk 2077 Stress	0.9	2327	68

Lautsprecher

Frequenzdiagramm (für Vergleiche die Checkboxen oben an-/abwählen)

Beelink SER9 Audio Analyse

(±) | Mittelmäßig laut spielende Lautsprecher (79.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | kaum Bass - 16% niedriger als der Median
(±) | durchschnittlich lineare Bass-Wiedergabe (10.3% Delta zum Vorgänger)
Mitteltöne 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | zu hohe Mitten, vom Median 6.2% abweichend
(±) | Linearität der Mitten ist durchschnittlich (12.3% Delta zum Vorgänger)
Hochtöne 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | ausgeglichene Hochtöne, vom Median nur 2.6% abweichend
(±) | durchschnittlich lineare Hochtöne (7.3% Delta zum Vorgänger)
Gesamt im hörbaren Bereich 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | hörbarer Bereich ist durchschnittlich linear (16.7% Abstand zum Median)
Im Vergleich zu allen Geräten derselben Klasse
» 14% aller getesteten Geräte dieser Klasse waren besser, 7% vergleichbar, 79% schlechter
» Das beste Gerät hat einen Delta-Wert von 14%, durchschnittlich ist 25%, das schlechteste Gerät hat 40%
Im Vergleich zu allen Geräten im Test
» 26% aller getesteten Geräte waren besser, 7% vergleichbar, 68% schlechter
» Das beste Gerät hat einen Delta-Wert von 4%, durchschnittlich ist 25%, das schlechteste Gerät hat 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Audio Analyse

(+) | Die Lautsprecher können relativ laut spielen (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | guter Bass - nur 3.8% Abweichung vom Median
(+) | lineare Bass-Wiedergabe (5.2% Delta zum Vorgänger)
Mitteltöne 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | ausgeglichene Mitten, vom Median nur 1.3% abweichend
(+) | lineare Mitten (2.1% Delta zum Vorgänger)
Hochtöne 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | ausgeglichene Hochtöne, vom Median nur 1.9% abweichend
(+) | sehr lineare Hochtöne (2.7% Delta zum Vorgänger)
Gesamt im hörbaren Bereich 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | hörbarer Bereich ist sehr linear (4.6% Abstand zum Median
Im Vergleich zu allen Geräten derselben Klasse
» 0% aller getesteten Geräte dieser Klasse waren besser, 0% vergleichbar, 100% schlechter
» Das beste Gerät hat einen Delta-Wert von 5%, durchschnittlich ist 18%, das schlechteste Gerät hat 45%
Im Vergleich zu allen Geräten im Test
» 0% aller getesteten Geräte waren besser, 0% vergleichbar, 100% schlechter
» Das beste Gerät hat einen Delta-Wert von 4%, durchschnittlich ist 25%, das schlechteste Gerät hat 134%

Energieverwaltung

Stromverbrauch

Der Beelink ist spürbar anspruchsvoller als viele andere Mini-PCs, was der Preis für seine höhere Leistung ist. Beim Spielen zum Beispiel benötigt unser SER9 mehr als das Doppelte der Leistung des MSI Cubi NUC 1M, der wohlgemerkt über 2x langsamer ist.

Das kleine (7 x 7 x 3 cm) 100-Watt-Netzteil reicht aus, wenn das System unter hoher Belastung etwas mehr als 80 Watt benötigt.

Beim Starten von Prime95 steigt der Verbrauch auf 81 W an.

Prime95+FurMark Stress eingeleitet bei 10s Marke

Stromverbrauch

Aus / Standby	0.7 / 0.84 Watt
Idle	5.7 / 5.9 / 6 Watt
Last	68.7 / 82 Watt


Legende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Beelink SER9 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,	Beelink SER8 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,	Beelink SEi11 Pro i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN, , x,	MSI Cubi NUC 1M Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, , x,	GMK NucBox K9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000, , x,	Asus NUC 14 Pro Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G, , x,
Stromverbrauch		-19%	-35%	1%	-34%	-21%
Idle min *	5.7	7.3 -28%	9.8 -72%	6.4 -12%	10.9 -91%	5.1 11%
Idle avg *	5.9	7.3 -24%	10.3 -75%	8.3 -41%	11 -86%	6.4 -8%
Idle max *	6	8.4 -40%	10.5 -75%	10.4 -73%	11.4 -90%	14.7 -145%
Last avg *	68.7	68.2 1%	54.2 21%	38.5 44%	52.8 23%	55.5 19%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	78.2			36.1 54%	57.1 27%	59.1 24%
Last max *	82	84.3 -3%	59 28%	52.5 36%	72.2 12%	103.3 -26%
Witcher 3 ultra *		75.1	53.1

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

Beelink SER9 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M: Ø80.7 (79.4-82)

GMK NucBox K9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core: Ø72 (71.3-72.6)

Power Consumption external Monitor

Beelink SER9 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø80.8 (79.9-81.3)

GMK NucBox K9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø70.5 (69.4-71)

Beelink SER9 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.5 (75.3-75.7)

GMK NucBox K9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø62.9 (31.3-65.1)

Beelink SER9 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø54.5 (52.2-58.1)

GMK NucBox K9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø48.5 (47-52.2)

Beelink SER9 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.02 (5.77-7.59)

GMK NucBox K9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø11.1 (10.8-13.9)

Beelink SER9 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø78.2 (75-80.2)

GMK NucBox K9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø57.1 (56.3-59.8)

Notebookcheck Bewertung

Zurück zum Fazit

Beelink SER9 - 14.11.2024 v8
Allen Ngo

Gehäuse

87 / 98 → 89%

Konnektivität

63 / 81 → 78%

Gewicht

78%

Leistung Spiele

54 / 80 → 68%

Leistung Anwendungen

86 / 92 → 93%

AI Performance

90%

Lautstärke

91%

Audio

67%

Durchschnitt

56%

77%

Mini PC - gewichteter Durchschnitt

Weitere Informationen über unsere Bewertung finden Sie hier.

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
77.8%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 31.7%

Keine Kommentare zum Artikel

Fragen, Anregungen, zusätzliche Informationen zu diesem Artikel? - Uns interessiert Deine Meinung (auch ohne Anmeldung möglich)!

Keine Kommentare zum Artikel / Antworten

Loading Comments

Diesen Artikel kommentieren / Antworten

Autor des Originals: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5241 Artikel auf Notebookcheck veröffentlicht seit 2011

Nach meinem Abschluss in Umwelthydrodynamik an der Universität von Kalifornien studierte ich Reaktorphysik und erhielt vom US NRC die Lizenz zum Betrieb von Kernreaktoren. Man gewinnt ein erstaunliches Maß an Wertschätzung für alltägliche Unterhaltungselektronik, nachdem man mit modernen Reaktorsystemen gearbeitet hat, die erstaunlicherweise noch immer von Computern aus den 80er Jahren betrieben werden. Wenn ich nicht gerade die US-Seite von Notebookcheck betreue, verfolge ich gerne die eSports-Szene und die neuesten Nachrichten aus dem Gaming-Bereich.

Kontakt: @AllenNgoNBC

Übersetzer: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 458020 Artikel auf Notebookcheck veröffentlicht seit 2008

Meine Hauptaufgabe als Redaktionsassistent ist die Pflege der Bibliothekssektion, in der Rezensionen aus anderen Publikationen und Kanälen gesammelt werden. Außerdem kümmere ich mich um Übersetzungen aus dem Englischen ins Französische, Italienische, Spanische, Portugiesische und Niederländische.

Kontakt: Facebook

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!

> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Tests > Notebook Testberichte > Beelink SER9 Test: AMD Zen 5 macht diesen Mini-PC schneller als je zuvor

Autor: Allen Ngo, 16.11.2024 (Update: 16.11.2024)

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core im Vergleich
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 (min) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28.1
...
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1096
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1099
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1099
Beelink SER9 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	1100
HP Omen 16 (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1107
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100,	1132
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M	1162
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 im Vergleich
Medion Akoya E1232T-MD99410 (min) N2807, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	143
...
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	15822
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	15844
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	15856
Beelink SER9 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	15873
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	15877
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	15894
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	15912
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609

Fazit - Der neue Ryzen AI 9 Prozessor steigert die Leistung noch weiter

Pro

Contra

Preis und Verfügbarkeit

Mögliche Konkurrenten im Vergleich

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Spezifikationen

Gehäuse

Größenvergleich

Anschlussausstattung

Kommunikation

Wartung

Nachhaltigkeit

Zubehör und Garantie

Performance

Testbedingungen

Prozessor

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Systemperformance

DPC-Latenzzeit

Speichergeräte

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU Performance

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart

Emissionen

Lautstärke

Temperatur

Stresstest

Lautsprecher

Beelink SER9 Audio Analyse

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Audio Analyse

Energieverwaltung

Stromverbrauch

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

Power Consumption external Monitor

Notebookcheck Bewertung

Weitere Artikel zur Serie

Transparenz

Keine Kommentare zum Artikel