Notebookcheck Logo

Beelink SER8 im PC-Test: Mac-Mini-inspiriertes Design mit einem AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

Bislang der beste Mini-PC von Beelink. Der SER8 kommt mit dem größten Designupdate, das wir bislang von der SER-Serie gesehen haben. Sein neues, an Apple angelehntes Aussehen versprüht definitiv Professionalität und kostet dabei nicht die Welt.
Beelink SER8
Beelink SER8

Die Beelink-SER-Serie meldet sich in diesem Jahr zurück und bietet nicht nur ein Prozessor-Upgrade vom AMD Zen 3+ zum Zen 4, sondern wurde nun bereits im dritten Jahr in Folge komplett redesignt. Dieses Mal sind die äußerlichen Änderungen aber nochmals bedeutender, sodass sich der aktuelle 2024er SER8 noch mehr von seinen Vorgängern abhebt.

Unsere Testeinheit ist mit einem Ryzen 7 8845HS, einer integrierten Radeon 780M, 32 GB RAM und einer 1 TB großen SSD ausgestattet und kostet in Deutschland rund 899 Euro auf Amazon.de (in den USA nur $650). Derzeit gibt es nur diese eine Konfiguration, lediglich die Farbe lässt sich in limitiertem Ausmaß wählen. 

Alternativen zum SER8 finden sich in anderen Mini-PCs in NUC-Größe wie der GMKtec NucBox K6, dem Geekom GT13 Pro oder auch dem Bosgame M1.

Weitere Beelink-Tests:

Gut (75%) Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HSAMD Radeon 780M Mini PC - 07/07/2024 - v8
Testgerät zur Verfügung gestellt von Beelink
Download der lizensierten Bewertungsgrafik als PNG / SVG
Beelink SER8
Prozessor
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Grafikkarte
AMD Radeon 780M, Kerntakt: 2700 MHz, DDR5, 31.0.24002.92
Hauptspeicher
32 GB 
, Crucial, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 46-45-45-90
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Massenspeicher
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, 1024 GB 
Soundkarte
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Anschlüsse
2 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Anschlüsse: 2x 3.5 mm combo
Netzwerk
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Abmessungen
Höhe x Breite x Tiefe (in mm): 50 x 135 x 135
Betriebssystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Sonstiges
HDMI cable, 12 Monate Garantie
Gewicht
776 g, Netzteil: 273 g
Preis
650 USD
Hinweis: Der Hersteller kann abweichende Bauteile wie Bildschirme, Laufwerke und Speicherriegel mit ähnlichen Spezifikationen unter dem gleichen Modellnamen einsetzen.

 

Potentielle Konkurrenten im Vergleich

Bew.
Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Dicke
Größe
Auflösung
Preis ab
74.9 %v8
07.2024
Beelink SER8
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
776 g50 mmx
86.6 %v7 (old)
09.2023
Beelink SER7
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
640 g49 mmx
86.3 %v7 (old)
07.2023
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
890 g48.8 mmx
83.6 %v7 (old)
04.2024
GMK NucBox K6
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
514 g47 mmx
72.1 %v8
06.2024
Geekom GT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
440 g37 mmx
73.7 %v8
06.2024
Aoostar GEM10
R7 6800H, Radeon 680M
525 g60 mmx

Hinweis: Wir haben unser Rating-System kürzlich aktualisiert und die Ergebnisse von Version 8 sind nicht mit den Ergebnissen von Version 7 vergleichbar. Weitere Informationen dazu sind hier verfügbar.

Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here .

Gehäuse — Weniger Plastik, mehr Metall

Das neue Gehäusedesign ist vielleicht das herausstechendste Merkmal des SER8. Während sich ältere Beelink-Modelle einer Kombination aus Plastik, Metall und Stoffasern bedienten, besteht das neue SER8 größtenteils aus einem Metall-Unibody, wodurch der Mini-PC aufgeräumter und professioneller wirkt. Seine ebenen Seiten und die matt-grauen Oberflächen ahmen quasi den Mac Mini nach, ohne das Modell wie eine billige Kopie wirken zu lassen. Wird Druck auf die Seiten oder die Kopfplatte ausgeübt, so gibt das Gehäuse nicht nach, unser Ersteindruck ist dementsprechend positiv, das SER8 erscheint uns qualitativ hochwertigen. 

Um die Produktionskosten niedrig zu halten, bestehen die Rückseite sowie die Bodenplatte weiterhin aus Plastik, sie sind deutlich weniger attraktiv als die die glänzenden Metalloberflächen und sind deshalb meistens vor der Nutzersicht verborgen, wenn der Mini-PC auf dem Tisch steht.

So sexy das neue Design auch ist, der Beelink ist dadurch größer und schwerer geworden, nämlich um 31 beziehungsweise 21 Prozent. Der Großteil davon lässt sich auf die nun prominentere Nutzung von Metall sowie auf das überarbeitete Vapor-Chamber-Kühlsystem zurückführen.

Es sind nur 2 Farboptionen wählbar: Hellgrau und Dunkelgrau
Es sind nur 2 Farboptionen wählbar: Hellgrau und Dunkelgrau
Die hinteren Luftausgänge sind für die Gehäuseabmessungen recht groß
Die hinteren Luftausgänge sind für die Gehäuseabmessungen recht groß
Gummilasche zum Herausziehen der Bodenplatte nach dem Lösen der Schrauben
Gummilasche zum Herausziehen der Bodenplatte nach dem Lösen der Schrauben
Die Schrauben sind durch runde Gummieinsätze geschützt
Die Schrauben sind durch runde Gummieinsätze geschützt

Größenvergleich

168 mm 120 mm 48.8 mm 890 g135 mm 135 mm 50 mm 776 g126 mm 113 mm 49 mm 640 g128 mm 126 mm 47 mm 514 g107 mm 107 mm 60 mm 525 g112.4 mm 112.4 mm 37 mm 440 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

Konnektivität - USB 3.2 oder doch 2.0?

Durch das neue Design haben sich auch die Anschlüsse im Vergleich zum alten SER7 leicht geändert. Auffallend ist, dass es jetzt nur noch zwei der zuvor drei USB-C-Ports gibt, dafür befinden sich nun zwei 3,5-mm-Klinkenports am Gehäuse. Dabei wird der vordere Klinkenport bevorzugt, sollte das System zwei verschiedene Audio-Outputs erkennen. Bei den USB-C-Ports unterstützt nur der an der Rückseite USB4, DisplayPort und Power Delivery, während der vordere Anschluss ausschließlich für Daten vorgesehen ist. 

Ärgerlicherweise sind zwei der vier USB-A-Ports noch vom (ur)alten Typ are USB 2.0, zudem gibt es dummerweise auch keine visuellen Hinweise, um sie von den schnelleren USB-3.2-Ports zu unterscheiden. In den früheren Modellen waren die unterschiedlichen USB-A-Ports noch farbkodiert, aber Beelink hat offenbar für das SER8 entschieden nun alle in Grau zu gestalten.

Leider gibt es auch keinen Kensington-Anschluss, was vor allem deshalb problematisch sein könnte, da Beobachter den SER8 schnell mal eben mit einem Mac Mini verwechseln könnten.

Vorne: Anschalter, Resetknopf, 3,5 mm Headset, USB-C (10 Gbps), USB-A 3.2 (10 Gbps)
Vorne: Anschalter, Resetknopf, 3,5 mm Headset, USB-C (10 Gbps), USB-A 3.2 (10 Gbps)
Hinten: USB-A 3.2 (10 Gbps), USB-A 2.0 (480 Mbps), RJ-45 (2,5 Gbps), DisplayPort 1.4 (4K@144), USB-A 2.0 (480 Mbps), HDMI 2.1 (4K@120), 3,5 mm Headset, USB-C 4.0 mit DisplayPort + Power Delivery (40 Gbps), Netzteil
Hinten: USB-A 3.2 (10 Gbps), USB-A 2.0 (480 Mbps), RJ-45 (2,5 Gbps), DisplayPort 1.4 (4K@144), USB-A 2.0 (480 Mbps), HDMI 2.1 (4K@120), 3,5 mm Headset, USB-C 4.0 mit DisplayPort + Power Delivery (40 Gbps), Netzteil

Kommunikation

Unser Testmodell wird noch mit einem Intel AX200 ausgeliefert, statt mit den neueren AX210 oder AX211, vermutlich um Kosten zu sparen. Dadurch wird allerdings weder Wi-Fi 6E noch Wi-Fi 7 unterstützt. Die Transferleistung in unserem Wi-Fi-6-Netzwerk ist zwar stabil, aber mit rund 800 Mb/s leider langsamer als erwartet.

Austauschbares WLAN-Modul sitzt unterhalb der M.2-SSDs
Austauschbares WLAN-Modul sitzt unterhalb der M.2-SSDs
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Beelink SER7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1324 (665min - 1408max) MBit/s +63%
Geekom GT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1146 (846min - 1308max) MBit/s +41%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1031 (961min - 1109max) MBit/s +27%
Beelink SER8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
812 (641min - 888max) MBit/s
GMK NucBox K6
MediaTek RZ616
634 (574min - 685max) MBit/s -22%
Aoostar GEM10
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
429 (325min - 510max) MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Geekom GT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1398 (1261min - 1453max) MBit/s +78%
GMK NucBox K6
MediaTek RZ616
1222 (1074min - 1368max) MBit/s +56%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1211 (1112min - 1284max) MBit/s +54%
Beelink SER7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1193 (588min - 1333max) MBit/s +52%
Beelink SER8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
784 (679min - 845max) MBit/s
Aoostar GEM10
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
451 (228min - 466max) MBit/s -42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Geekom GT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1429 (1392min - 1511max) MBit/s
GMK NucBox K6
MediaTek RZ616
432 (212min - 471max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Geekom GT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1583 (1557min - 1611max) MBit/s
GMK NucBox K6
MediaTek RZ616
984 (937min - 1048max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850Tooltip
Beelink SER8; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø812 (641-888)
Beelink SER8; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø784 (679-845)

Wartung

Die Wartung entpuppt sich als Vorgang in zwei Schritten: Zunächst muss die äußere Platte entfernt werden, indem man die vier Kreuzschrauben in den Ecken löst. Danach wollen zwei weitere Kreuzschrauben in den Ecken gelockert werden, damit man den metallenen Staubfilter abnehmen kann. Im Inneren haben Nutzer einen direkten Zugang zu den beiden DDR5-SODIMM-Slots, den zwei M.2-2280-SSD-Slots sowie dem WLAN-Modul. Der Vapor-Chamber-Kühler und die CPU sitzen auf der anderen Seite des Mainboards. 

Der metallene Staubfilter nach dem Entfernen der Plastik-Unterseite
Der metallene Staubfilter nach dem Entfernen der Plastik-Unterseite
Leichter Zugang zu den austauschbaren Komponenten
Leichter Zugang zu den austauschbaren Komponenten

Zubehör und Garantie

Die Verpackung beherbergt ein HDMI-Kabel, etwas Papierkram und das Standard-Netzteil. Alternativ kann das System auch über ein universelles USB-C-Netzteil betrieben werden, sofern dieses genug Energie bereitstellt. Beispielsweise erwies sich unser 135-W-USB-C-Netzteil von Lenovo als kompatibel mit dem SER8.

Was uns in der Verpackung fehlt, ist die austauschbare VESA-Halterung, welche sonst bei nahezu allen Mini-PCs von Beelink beilag. Der Grund: Das neue SER8 ist nicht mehr VESA-kompatibel, ein Nachteil des neuen Designs.

In Deutschland greift nur 1 Jahr "sorgenfreie Garantie und 24 Stunden Kundendienst".

Leistung — Zen 4 ist bereit für KI

 
 

Testbedingungen

Vor unserem Benchmark-Parkour haben wir Windows in den Leistungsmodus versetzt.

Es gibt einen speziellen "65 W"-Modus (auch PowerLimit Setting genannt), welcher jedoch nur über das BIOS beim Booten zugänglich ist. Standardmäßig ist das System hingegen auf "54 W" eingestellt, unabhängig vom ausgewählten Leistungsprofil in Windows. Absurderweise will der Hersteller, dass man den Kundenservice zwecks Hilfe beim Umstellen von 54 W auf 65 W kontaktiert ("contact customer service for guidance"), was sonst kein anderer Hersteller vorschlägt. Wir testen den Mini-PC mit der Standard-54-W-Voreinstellung.

Prozessor

Die CPU-Leistung unseres Ryzen 7 8845HS erweist sich als ausgezeichnet und quasi identisch zum Geekom A8, welcher mit dem teureren Ryzen 9 8945HS ausgestattet ist. Die AMD-CPU liegt durchschnittlich komfortabel zwischen einem Core Ultra 7 155H und dem Core Ultra 9 185H, aber wir vermuten, dass sie auch gut mit einem Core Ultra 9 185H mithalten kann, sobald man den 65-W-Modus aktiviert.

Auch die Leistungskonstanz im CineBench-R15-xT-Loop ist hervorragend, ganz anders als das Intel-betriebene Geekom GT13 Pro.

Auf der anderen Seite bietet der Ryzen 7 8845HS keine reinen Leistungsvorteile gegenüber der schon schnellen Zen-3+CPU Ryzen 7 7840HS. Der größte Unterschiedsfaktor liegt in der integrierten NPU zur Beschleunigung von KI-Anwendungen wie Microsofts Co-Pilot. Wenn diese Funktion im Nutzungsszenario keine Rolle spielt, läuft der SER7 genauso schnell wie der SER8.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

0135270405540675810945108012151350148516201755189020252160229524302565Tooltip
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2607 (2586.82-2626.57)
Beelink SER7 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2544 (2511.62-2564.76)
Beelink GTR7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2669 (2587.99-2689.08)
GMK NucBox K6 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2520 (2510.2-2537.27)
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1776 (1688.48-2326.12)
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø1983 (1919.75-2106.82)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
88.9 pt
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
66.8 pt
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
66.7 pt
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
66.2 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
65.8 pt
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
 
64.2 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
61.9 pt
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
61.2 pt
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.5 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
58.9 pt
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
58.6 pt
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
57.7 pt
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
52.6 pt
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
51.8 pt
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
48.8 pt
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
48.5 pt
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
47.7 pt
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
34.1 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
30799 Points +85%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18016 Points +8%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
16795 Points +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
16661 (16363.9min - 16661max) Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (15494 - 18037, n=8)
16398 Points -2%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16352 Points -2%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
16105 (15785.6min - 16105.2max) Points -3%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
14659 Points -12%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
14573 Points -13%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
13899 Points -17%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
13117 Points -21%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
13015 Points -22%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
12155 Points -27%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
11135 (10740.5min - 11134.5max) Points -33%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
11072 Points -34%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10819 Points -35%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
10418 (10142.8min - 10418max) Points -37%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
6649 (6519.7min - 6648.75max) Points -60%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
1957 Points +10%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
1907 Points +7%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1901 Points +7%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
1878 Points +5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1851 Points +4%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
1825 Points +2%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1801 Points +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1783 Points
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
1780 Points 0%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1774 Points -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1623 - 1783, n=8)
1747 Points -2%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1715 Points -4%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
1605 Points -10%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1543 Points -13%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
1542 Points -14%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
1486 Points -17%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1405 Points -21%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1267 Points -29%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
12210 Points +90%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7196 Points +12%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
6591 Points +2%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6431 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (6110 - 7026, n=8)
6419 Points 0%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6344 Points -1%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6033 Points -6%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5691 Points -12%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
5633 Points -12%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
5472 Points -15%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
5216 Points -19%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
5013 Points -22%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
4687 Points -27%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
4339 Points -33%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
4324 Points -33%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4229 Points -34%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
4106 Points -36%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
2580 Points -60%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
754 Points +8%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
735 Points +5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
734 Points +5%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
723 Points +4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
715 Points +2%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
711 Points +2%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
698 Points 0%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
698 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (677 - 698, n=8)
687 Points -2%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
685 Points -2%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
681 Points -2%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
659 Points -6%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
615 Points -12%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
604 Points -13%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
598 Points -14%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
584 Points -16%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points -21%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
495 Points -29%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
4998 Points +90%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2746 Points +5%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
2640 Points 0%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2638 (2192.5min - 2638.35max) Points 0%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2627 (2586.82min - 2626.57max) Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (2442 - 2908, n=8)
2598 Points -1%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2565 (2511.62min - 2564.76max) Points -2%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
2405 Points -8%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2260 Points -14%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2249 Points -14%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
2136 Points -19%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
2117 Points -19%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
1990 Points -24%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1795 Points -32%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1773 Points -33%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
1770 (1710.13min - 1769.75max) Points -33%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
1737 (1708.16min - 1737.02max) Points -34%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1130 (1041.59min - 1129.53max) Points -57%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
309 Points +9%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
287 Points +1%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
283 Points 0%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
283 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (269 - 283, n=8)
277 Points -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
270 Points -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
268 Points -5%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
267 Points -6%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
266 Points -6%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
256 Points -10%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
251 Points -11%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
245 Points -13%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
245 Points -13%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
243 Points -14%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
243 Points -14%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
240 Points -15%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
227 Points -20%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
188.1 Points -34%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
427 Seconds * -124%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
293 Seconds * -53%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
293 Seconds * -53%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
279 Seconds * -46%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
270 Seconds * -41%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
268 Seconds * -40%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
262 Seconds * -37%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
259 Seconds * -36%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
254 Seconds * -33%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
234 Seconds * -23%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
223 Seconds * -17%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
205 Seconds * -7%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (179 - 216, n=8)
199.5 Seconds * -4%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
196 Seconds * -3%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
196 Seconds * -3%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
191 Seconds *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
171 Seconds * +10%
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
99 Seconds * +48%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
131378 MIPS +85%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
71934 MIPS +1%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
71874 MIPS +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
70937 MIPS
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
69882 MIPS -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (64759 - 74664, n=8)
68581 MIPS -3%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
62334 MIPS -12%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
55620 MIPS -22%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
55528 MIPS -22%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
55067 MIPS -22%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53954 MIPS -24%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
52663 MIPS -26%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
52479 MIPS -26%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
51340 MIPS -28%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
49486 MIPS -30%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
49353 MIPS -30%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
48327 MIPS -32%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
34172 MIPS -52%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
7609 MIPS +13%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6734 MIPS 0%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6714 MIPS
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
6668 MIPS -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (5197 - 6714, n=8)
6333 MIPS -6%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
6321 MIPS -6%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6136 MIPS -9%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
6076 MIPS -10%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
6018 MIPS -10%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
5887 MIPS -12%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
5840 MIPS -13%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5796 MIPS -14%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
5720 MIPS -15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5560 MIPS -17%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
5521 MIPS -18%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5486 MIPS -18%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5344 MIPS -20%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
4599 MIPS -32%
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
16765 Points +25%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
13619 Points +2%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
13362 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13356 Points 0%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (11073 - 14014, n=12)
12856 Points -4%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
12694 Points -5%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12539 Points -6%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
12044 Points -10%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11358 Points -15%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
10997 Points -18%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
10721 Points -20%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
10348 Points -23%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
9527 Points -29%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
9411 Points -30%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
9401 Points -30%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
9240 Points -31%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
7854 Points -41%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
6260 Points -53%
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
2880 Points +7%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
2698 Points 0%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2694 Points
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2657 Points -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (2510 - 2698, n=10)
2613 Points -3%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2611 Points -3%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
2582 Points -4%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2580 Points -4%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
2575 Points -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2492 Points -7%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
2483 Points -8%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2415 Points -10%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
2355 Points -13%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
2072 Points -23%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
2049 Points -24%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
2042 Points -24%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1991 Points -26%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1625 Points -40%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
19836 Points +63%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13392 Points +10%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
12481 Points +2%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12248 Points 0%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12196 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (11625 - 12726, n=9)
11995 Points -2%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
11423 Points -6%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
11406 Points -6%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11283 Points -7%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
10378 Points -15%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
10322 Points -15%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
10269 Points -16%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
8898 Points -27%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
8829 Points -28%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8823 Points -28%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
8195 Points -33%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
7368 Points -40%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
5593 Points -54%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
2147 Points +7%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2004 Points
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
1996 Points 0%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1983 Points -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (1765 - 2004, n=9)
1929 Points -4%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1866 Points -7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1856 Points -7%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
1842 Points -8%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1841 Points -8%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
1832 Points -9%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
1805 Points -10%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1720 Points -14%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
1692 Points -16%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
1552 Points -23%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1534 Points -23%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
1513 Points -25%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1494 Points -25%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1203 Points -40%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
34.6 fps +64%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
21.1 fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.9 fps -1%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
20.9 fps -1%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
20.4 fps -3%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (18.6 - 22.7, n=8)
20.2 fps -4%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18.3 fps -13%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
16.3 fps -23%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
16.2 fps -23%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
15 fps -29%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
14.9 fps -29%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
14.1 fps -33%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
13.9 fps -34%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
13.9 fps -34%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
13.6 fps -36%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13.3 fps -37%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
12.7 fps -40%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
8.44 fps -60%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
58 s * -26%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
54.8 s * -19%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
54.3 s * -18%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
53 s * -15%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
52.5 s * -14%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
52.4 s * -14%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (44.5 - 77, n=8)
51.4 s * -11%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
51.2 s * -11%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
49.9 s * -8%
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
49.7 s * -8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
49.5 s * -7%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
46.9 s * -2%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
46.1 s *
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
42.3 s * +8%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
40 s * +13%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
39.7 s * +14%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
39.4 s * +15%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
37.2 s * +19%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
0.584 sec * -35%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.523 sec * -21%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.52 sec * -20%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
0.515 sec * -19%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
0.507 sec * -17%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
0.4995 sec * -15%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4801 sec * -11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4627 sec * -7%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (0.4336 - 0.4935, n=8)
0.4516 sec * -4%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P
0.45 sec * -4%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500
0.4469 sec * -3%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
0.4446 sec * -3%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4395 sec * -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4391 sec * -1%
Acemagic M2A
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4347 sec * -0%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
0.4346 sec * -0%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4336 sec *
Minisforum G7 PT
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
0.406 sec * +6%
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2627 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
253 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
283 Points
Hilfe
Performance Rating
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
99.9 pt
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
96.9 pt
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
93.8 pt
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
93.6 pt
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
 
90.9 pt
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
67 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
56.5 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
27538 KRay/s +5%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
26305 KRay/s
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (24472 - 29544, n=8)
26290 KRay/s 0%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
25685 KRay/s -2%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
25360 KRay/s -4%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
13726 KRay/s -48%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
11735 KRay/s -55%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
116903 Points +5%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
111508 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (100050 - 125873, n=8)
111021 Points 0%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
109853 Points -1%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
107805 Points -3%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
86223 Points -23%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
59094 Points -47%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
5096 MB/s +3%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
4933 MB/s
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
4783 MB/s -3%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (4503 - 5180, n=8)
4775 MB/s -3%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
4763 MB/s -3%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
2953 MB/s -40%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2718 MB/s -45%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
117764 Points +2%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (109458 - 124695, n=8)
116214 Points +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
115546 Points
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
111969 Points -3%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
111803 Points -3%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
98582 Points -15%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
93952 Points -19%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
15525 Points +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
15420 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (14496 - 15519, n=8)
15024 Points -3%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
14721 Points -5%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
14705 Points -5%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
12159 Points -21%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8026 Points -48%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
62378 Points +5%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
59522 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (53436 - 67367, n=8)
59238 Points 0%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
58699 Points -1%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
57534 Points -3%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
47463 Points -20%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
29138 Points -51%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
177158 MB/s +3%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
172642 MB/s
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
164041 MB/s -5%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
161216 MB/s -7%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
119681 MB/s -31%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
102677 MB/s -41%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (67393 - 172642, n=8)
94612 MB/s -45%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
1103 MB/s +3%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
1073 MB/s
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
1031 MB/s -4%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (627 - 1080, n=8)
969 MB/s -10%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
949 MB/s -12%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
789 MB/s -26%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
757 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
14722 KRay/s +5%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
14041 KRay/s
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (12935 - 15911, n=8)
14008 KRay/s 0%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
13904 KRay/s -1%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
13642 KRay/s -3%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
7279 KRay/s -48%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6205 KRay/s -56%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
41088 MPixel/s +1%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
40760 MPixel/s +1%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
40726 MPixel/s +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
40489 MPixel/s
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (38580 - 41668, n=8)
40380 MPixel/s 0%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
28269 MPixel/s -30%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
26496 MPixel/s -35%

Stresstest

Beim Starten von Prime95 stress boostet die CPU auf 4,0 GHz hoch und bleibt bei einer stabilen Leistungsaufnahme von 54 W ohne Einbrüche, genau wie vom Hersteller versprochen. Die Kerntemperaturen haben ihr Plateau bei gemäßigten 75 °C, was noch ein wenig Spielraum für die 65-W-Einstellung lässt.

Unter Witcher 3 taktet die GPU durchschnittlich mit 2.700 MHz und erhitzt sich dabei auf 62 °C, verglichen mit den 2.526 MHz und 64 °C auf dem SER7, und trotzdem bleiben die Lüftergeräusche beim SER8 deutlich leiser.

Leerlauf
Leerlauf
Witcher-3-Stress
Witcher-3-Stress
Prime95-Stress
Prime95-Stress
Prime95+FurMark-Stress
Prime95+FurMark-Stress
CPU-Takt (GHz) GPU-Takt (MHz) Durchschn. CPU-Temperatur (°C)
Leerlauf -- -- 30
Prime95 Stress 4,0 -- 75
Prime95 + FurMark Stress 4,2 2.317 68
Witcher 3 Stress 0,5 2.700 62

Systemleistung

Die PCMark-Ergebnisse sind mit die höchsten, die wir je auf einem Mini-PC mit integrierter Grafik gemessen haben, aber sie sind nicht viel besser als was wir bereits letztes Jahr beim SER7 gemessen haben, sodass es eher marginale Verbesserungen bei den Alltagsaufgaben gibt. Auch die Speicherleistung hat sich trotz des Wechsels von Zen 3+ auf Zen 4 nicht gesteigert.

PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 / Score
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
7641 Points
GMK NucBox K6
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
7529 Points -1%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
7453 Points -2%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (7120 - 7641, n=5)
7338 Points -4%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
7225 Points -5%
Aoostar GEM10
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
6749 Points -12%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
5944 Points -22%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
11570 Points
GMK NucBox K6
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
11214 Points -3%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
11155 Points -4%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (10685 - 11570, n=5)
10965 Points -5%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10819 Points -6%
Aoostar GEM10
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
10522 Points -9%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
10347 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10702 Points +2%
GMK NucBox K6
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
10591 Points +1%
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10457 Points
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10452 Points 0%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (9787 - 10482, n=5)
10150 Points -3%
Aoostar GEM10
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
9367 Points -10%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
7319 Points -30%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10009 Points
GMK NucBox K6
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
9752 Points -3%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (9367 - 10009, n=5)
9638 Points -4%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
9409 Points -6%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
9052 Points -10%
Aoostar GEM10
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
8466 Points -15%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
7527 Points -25%
CrossMark / Overall
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1875 Points
GMK NucBox K6
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
1873 Points 0%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1702 - 1939, n=5)
1829 Points -2%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
1766 Points -6%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1700 Points -9%
Aoostar GEM10
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
1648 Points -12%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1566 Points -16%
CrossMark / Productivity
GMK NucBox K6
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
1816 Points +1%
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1802 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1634 - 1872, n=5)
1762 Points -2%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
1736 Points -4%
Aoostar GEM10
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
1629 Points -10%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1621 Points -10%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1559 Points -13%
CrossMark / Creativity
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2009 Points
GMK NucBox K6
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
1994 Points -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1860 - 2040, n=5)
1966 Points -2%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1953 Points -3%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
1789 Points -11%
Aoostar GEM10
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
1696 Points -16%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1556 Points -23%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
1790 Points +4%
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1718 Points
GMK NucBox K6
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
1706 Points -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1476 - 1849, n=5)
1654 Points -4%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1620 Points -6%
Aoostar GEM10
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
1566 Points -9%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1293 Points -25%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
339 Points +1%
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
334 Points
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
332 Points -1%
GMK NucBox K6
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
328 Points -2%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (295 - 334, n=5)
308 Points -8%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
304 Points -9%
Aoostar GEM10
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
275 Points -18%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
280 Points +5%
GMK NucBox K6
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
266 Points 0%
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
266 Points
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (245 - 314, n=5)
266 Points 0%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
265 Points 0%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
263 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM10
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
223 Points -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Aoostar GEM10
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
591 ms * -18%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (501 - 664, n=5)
546 ms * -9%
GMK NucBox K6
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
534 ms * -7%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
518 ms * -3%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
517 ms * -3%
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
501 ms *
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
485 ms * +3%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

PCMark 10 Score
7641 Punkte
Hilfe
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
69325 MB/s +2%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
69281 MB/s +1%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
69199 MB/s +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
68283 MB/s
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (61459 - 70235, n=8)
67947 MB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
50829 MB/s -26%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45721 MB/s -33%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
61976 MB/s
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
61911 MB/s 0%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
61838 MB/s 0%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
61708 MB/s 0%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (49866 - 61976, n=8)
58440 MB/s -6%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45995 MB/s -26%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
43828 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (82796 - 93239, n=8)
87829 MB/s +3%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
87358 MB/s +2%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
87226 MB/s +2%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
86528 MB/s +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
85464 MB/s
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
51116 MB/s -40%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45733 MB/s -46%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M
104.1 ns * -17%
Durchschnittliche AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  (82.5 - 107.1, n=8)
94.2 ns * -6%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
88.9 ns *
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
88.1 ns * +1%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
85.1 ns * +4%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
85.1 ns * +4%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
75.8 ns * +15%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

DPC Latency

LatencyMon zeigt beim Öffnen mehrerer Browsertabs auf unserer Homepage keinerlei DPC-Probleme auf. Leider gestaltet sich dafür die Wiedergabe unseres 4K/60-fps-YouTubevideos als alles andere als perfekt, innerhalb von 60 s werden 20 ausgelassene Frames registriert. Dieses Problem ist tatsächlich auf AMD-PCs häufiger anzutreffen als auf Intel-Systemen und es ist etwas enttäuschend, dass sich der Trend auf dem SER8 fortsetzt. Die Mehrheit der Nutzer wird das gelegentliche Auslassen von Einzelbildern nicht bemerken, aber im Idealfall sollte das Problem gar nicht erst auftreten, insbesondere bei einer CPU der Ryzen-7-HS-Klasse.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
Treiberliste
Treiberliste

Massenspeicher

Unser Modell ist mit der gleichen PCIe4-x4-NVMe-SSD namens Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 ausgestattet wie der GTR7 und der SER7, was von einer konsistenten Speicherbestückung in Beelink-Mini-PCs zeugt. Wir wissen es zu schätzen, dass der Hersteller SSDs bekannter Marken verwendet, während andere Mini-PC-Hersteller wie GMktec eher unbekanntere SSD-Modelle verbauen. Im DiskSpd-Loop-Test zeigt die SSD eine sehr gute Leistungskonstanz, Drosselungen sind hier kein Thema. 

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS SSD
AS SSD
Das SER8 verwendet nun einen deutlich größeren Kühlkörper, welcher beide SSD-Slots abdeckt
Das SER8 verwendet nun einen deutlich größeren Kühlkörper, welcher beide SSD-Slots abdeckt
Unter dem Kühlkörper befinden sich die 2 M.2-2280-SSD-Slots
Unter dem Kühlkörper befinden sich die 2 M.2-2280-SSD-Slots
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4735 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1899 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 697.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 403 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2335 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1793 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 63.12 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 273.3 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
83 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
79.5 pt
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
71.4 pt
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
68.7 pt
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
61.1 pt
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
45.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
4357 (4314.26min - 4356.72max) MB/s +40%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
4000 (3961.36min - 3999.66max) MB/s +29%
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
3703 (3243.89min - 3702.94max) MB/s +19%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3106 (3062.47min - 3106.43max) MB/s
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3033 (3026.64min - 3032.69max) MB/s -2%
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2718 (2645.56min - 2717.91max) MB/s -12%
seq write
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
5595 (1443.73min - 5595.13max) MB/s +22%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4604 (4532.99min - 4603.88max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
4553 (4417.86min - 4552.92max) MB/s -1%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
4544 (4380.79min - 4543.83max) MB/s -1%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3591 (3535.23min - 3591.16max) MB/s -22%
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3404 (38.3min - 3403.58max) MB/s -26%
seq q8 t1 read
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
7069 (6459.52min - 7068.99max) MB/s +36%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
7007 (6166.72min - 7006.62max) MB/s +35%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
5195 (4594.02min - 5195.39max) MB/s
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
5174 (4541.87min - 5174.3max) MB/s 0%
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4893 (3920.33min - 4893.08max) MB/s -6%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
4878 (4476.29min - 4877.98max) MB/s -6%
seq q8 t1 write
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
6669 (1251.16min - 6668.61max) MB/s +41%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
5261 (5018.9min - 5261.3max) MB/s +11%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4725 (4657.36min - 4724.88max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
4505 (4403.81min - 4505.09max) MB/s -5%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3570 (3522.17min - 3569.77max) MB/s -24%
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
739 (52.85min - 739.46max) MB/s -84%
4k q1 t1 read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
85.3 (82.57min - 85.32max) MB/s +7%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
79.7 (77.93min - 79.74max) MB/s
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
71 (70.41min - 71.02max) MB/s -11%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
62.6 (62.13min - 62.62max) MB/s -21%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
61.7 (61.26min - 61.71max) MB/s -23%
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
44.2 (41.58min - 44.2max) MB/s -45%
4k q1 t1 write
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
327 (306.06min - 326.78max) MB/s +13%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
289 (283.17min - 289.07max) MB/s
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
269 (266.85min - 269.05max) MB/s -7%
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
239 (237.67min - 239.17max) MB/s -17%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
235 (230.8min - 235.02max) MB/s -19%
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
139.4 (137.92min - 139.38max) MB/s -52%
4k q32 t16 read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
3593 (3380.17min - 3593.41max) MB/s +14%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3139 (3067min - 3138.94max) MB/s
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2810 (2697.36min - 2809.61max) MB/s -10%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2765 (2513.4min - 2765.45max) MB/s -12%
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
2463 (2040.37min - 2463.15max) MB/s -22%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
2004 (2002.37min - 2004.23max) MB/s -36%
4k q32 t16 write
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4288 (4275.2min - 4287.55max) MB/s
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
3983 (3232.63min - 3982.67max) MB/s -7%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3254 (3139.57min - 3253.57max) MB/s -24%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
2681 (2560.18min - 2680.76max) MB/s -37%
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1066 (54.15min - 1066.13max) MB/s -75%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
762 (700.88min - 761.76max) MB/s -82%
AS SSD
Score Total
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
7918 Points +199%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
6798 Points +157%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
6147 Points +132%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
5182 Points +96%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2646 Points
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2617 Points -1%
Score Read
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
3258 Points +194%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
2866 Points +159%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
2109 Points +90%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1796 Points +62%
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1215 Points +10%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1108 Points
Score Write
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
3000 Points +184%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
2964 Points +180%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
2516 Points +138%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2508 Points +137%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1057 Points
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
800 Points -24%
Seq Read
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
5825.09 MB/s +49%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
4546 MB/s +16%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
4264 MB/s +9%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3913.46 MB/s
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3900.61 MB/s 0%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3786.44 MB/s -3%
Seq Write
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
5783.3 MB/s +197%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
3970 MB/s +104%
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3390.67 MB/s +74%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
3374 MB/s +73%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2799.85 MB/s +44%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1944.73 MB/s
4K Read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
83.4 MB/s +62%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
68.4 MB/s +33%
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
65.5 MB/s +27%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
59.79 MB/s +16%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
51.6 MB/s
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
37.69 MB/s -27%
4K Write
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
296 MB/s +35%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
219.02 MB/s
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
210.95 MB/s -4%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
196.5 MB/s -10%
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
190.06 MB/s -13%
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
129.29 MB/s -41%
4K-64 Read
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
2610.4 MB/s +293%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
2328 MB/s +250%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
1614 MB/s +143%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1357.17 MB/s +104%
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
787.73 MB/s +18%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
664.76 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
2370 MB/s +268%
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
2231.47 MB/s +247%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2017.38 MB/s +214%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
1883 MB/s +193%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
643.31 MB/s
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
331.93 MB/s -48%
Access Time Read
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
0.127 ms * -65%
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
0.098 ms * -27%
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
0.079 ms * -3%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
0.077 ms *
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
0.066 ms * +14%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
0.047 ms * +39%
Access Time Write
GMK NucBox K6
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
0.196 ms * -161%
Beelink SER7
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
0.076 ms * -1%
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
0.075 ms *
Aoostar GEM10
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
0.061 ms * +19%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Acer N7000
0.059 ms * +21%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
0.049 ms * +35%

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

02605207801040130015601820208023402600286031203380364039004160442046804940Tooltip
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5188 (4957.94-5197.46)
Beelink SER7 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8: Ø5151 (4560.99-5169.27)

Grafikleistung

Die Radeon 780M im Ryzen 7 8845HS bietet bestenfalls marginale Leistungssteigerungen zur gleichen GPU im letztjährigen SER7. Das ist nicht unbedingt negativ gemeint, denn AMD bewegt sich immer noch Kopf-an-Kopf mit Intel, auch verglichen mit deren aktuellster Arc 8-iGPU in der Meteor-Lake-H-Plattform. Beispielsweise ist die Arc-8-iGPU im Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti ungefähr 10 Prozent schneller im DX12-basierten Time-Spy-Benchmark, während es genau andersherum im DX11-basierten Fire-Strike-Benchmark ist.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
Steel Nomad
Steel Nomad
Speed Way
Speed Way
 
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
BOSGAME M1
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
98.8 pt
Beelink SER8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
94.3 pt
Geekom A8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
91.8 pt
AcePC Wizbox AI -1!
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
90 pt
Beelink SER7 -1!
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
89.9 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
87.3 pt
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
 
85.3 pt
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
81.3 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
57 pt
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
55.7 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
53.3 pt
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
52.7 pt
Geekom A5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
50.1 pt
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
46.1 pt
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
39.5 pt
GMK NucBox M4 -2!
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i9-11900H
27.2 pt
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-13500
26.1 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
BOSGAME M1
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
14249 Points +4%
Beelink SER8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
13673 Points
Geekom A8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
13533 Points -1%
Beelink SER7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
12845 Points -6%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (7868 - 14249, n=49)
12437 Points -9%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12105 Points -11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
11691 Points -14%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
11668 Points -15%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
7424 Points -46%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
7321 Points -46%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
7184 Points -47%
Geekom A5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7101 Points -48%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
6999 Points -49%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
6858 Points -50%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
5388 Points -61%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-13500
3428 Points -75%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i9-11900H
3122 Points -77%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
BOSGAME M1
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
53972 Points +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
53347 Points
Geekom A8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
49053 Points -8%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (27771 - 53972, n=25)
46300 Points -13%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
45116 Points -15%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
40417 Points -24%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
38976 Points -27%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
33541 Points -37%
Geekom A5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
32875 Points -38%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
32427 Points -39%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
31849 Points -40%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
31054 Points -42%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
25003 Points -53%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
24634 Points -54%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i9-11900H
16753 Points -69%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-13500
16288 Points -69%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
BOSGAME M1
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
8816 Points +3%
Beelink SER8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
8572 Points
Geekom A8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
8354 Points -3%
Beelink SER7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
8001 Points -7%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (4550 - 8816, n=50)
7711 Points -10%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
7653 Points -11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7599 Points -11%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
5812 Points -32%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
5616 Points -34%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
5407 Points -37%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
4984 Points -42%
Geekom A5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4567 Points -47%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
4424 Points -48%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
3653 Points -57%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-13500
2643 Points -69%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i9-11900H
2517 Points -71%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3271 Points +12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3193 Points +9%
BOSGAME M1
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
3178 Points +9%
Beelink SER8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2917 Points
Beelink SER7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2908 Points 0%
Geekom A8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
2901 Points -1%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (1496 - 3196, n=50)
2705 Points -7%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
2518 Points -14%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1690 Points -42%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
1672 Points -43%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
1583 Points -46%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
1582 Points -46%
Geekom A5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1418 Points -51%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1399 Points -52%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1162 Points -60%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-13500
739 Points -75%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3634 Points +11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3580 Points +9%
BOSGAME M1
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
3517 Points +7%
Beelink SER8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
3274 Points
Beelink SER7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
3270 Points 0%
Geekom A8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
3264 Points 0%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (1707 - 3517, n=49)
3019 Points -8%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
2808 Points -14%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1926 Points -41%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
1903 Points -42%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
1813 Points -45%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
1793 Points -45%
Geekom A5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1620 Points -51%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1591 Points -51%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
1318 Points -60%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-13500
857 Points -74%
3DMark 11 Performance
13420 Punkte
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
39359 Punkte
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7906 Punkte
3DMark Time Spy Score
3274 Punkte
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
513 Punkte
Hilfe
Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Geekom A5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
477 Seconds *
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
458 Seconds *
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
306 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
758 Seconds * -145%
Geekom A5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
513 Seconds * -65%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
497 Seconds * -60%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i9-11900H
479 Seconds * -55%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
477 Seconds * -54%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
467 Seconds * -51%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
460 Seconds * -48%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
438 Seconds * -41%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK
413 Seconds * -33%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-13500
399 Seconds * -29%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (305 - 664, n=47)
376 Seconds * -21%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
364 Seconds * -17%
BOSGAME M1
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
319 Seconds * -3%
Beelink SER7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
318 Seconds * -3%
Geekom A8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
313 Seconds * -1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
310 Seconds *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
294 Seconds * +5%
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
255 Seconds *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
254 Seconds *

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Gaming Performance

Zwar ist der SER8 keine Gaming-Maschine, dennoch wird er Gelegenheitsspieler in 1080p zufriedenstellen. Die meisten älteren Titel laufen in 1080p und mittleren Einstellungen flüssig, neuere oder forderndere Games wie Baldur's Gate 3 kommen in 1080p und niedrigen Einstellungen auf um die 40 fps. Das ist genau so schnell wie es aktuell geht, ohne eine dedizierte oder externe Grafikkarte zu bemühen.

Performance Rating - Percent
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
100 pt
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
97.4 pt
Beelink GTR7 7840HS -1!
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
96.1 pt
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
95.3 pt
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
83.8 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro -2!
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
59.9 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
32 (28min) fps
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
31.5 (29min) fps -2%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
30.8 (27min) fps -4%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
30.5 (28min) fps -5%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
27.1 (13.6min, 15.7P0.1, 17.4P1) fps -15%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
29.4 fps
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
29.3 fps 0%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28.9 fps -2%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28.5 fps -3%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
26.2 fps -11%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
18.2 fps -38%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
50.8 (24.5min, 33.9P1) fps
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
48.8 (11.1min, 31.1P1) fps -4%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
48.2 (36.6min, 37.7P1) fps -5%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
48.2 (23.8min, 32P1) fps -5%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
43 (20min, 25.4P1) fps -15%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26.9 (5.4min, 7.47P1) fps -47%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
90.4 (71.8min) fps
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
87.4 (16.1min) fps -3%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
85.6 (74.9min) fps -5%
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
85.5 (75.7min) fps -5%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
70.2 (61.6min) fps -22%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
58.6 (51.6min) fps -35%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
39.7 fps 0%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
39.6 fps
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
37.5 fps -5%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
37 fps -7%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
36.5 fps -8%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
45 (40min) fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
44 (39min) fps -2%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
43 (38min) fps -4%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
33 (29min) fps -27%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
27 (24min) fps -40%
Baldur's Gate 3
1280x720 Low Preset
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
64.7 fps +2%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
63.4 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (30.7 - 67.4, n=10)
55 fps -13%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
48.9 (16.6min, 29.1P0.1, 36.8P1) fps -23%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
37.3 fps -41%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26.2 (4.4min, 7.02P0.1, 18.4P1) fps -59%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
22.5 fps -65%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
16.6 (2.68min, 3.81P0.1, 6.04P1) fps -74%
1920x1080 Low Preset
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
43.9 fps +6%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
41.6 fps
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
36.9 (23.7min, 25.2P0.1, 27.4P1) fps -11%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (20.2 - 43.9, n=17)
36.2 fps -13%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
22.9 fps -45%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
18 (5.95min, 5.96P0.1, 6.91P1) fps -57%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
14.2 fps -66%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
9.7 (2.89min, 2.93P0.1, 3.12P1) fps -77%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
36.8 fps +6%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
34.8 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (15.7 - 36.8, n=19)
29.1 fps -16%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
28.3 (8.76min, 14.9P0.1, 21.7P1) fps -19%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
15.1 fps -57%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
14 (4.57min, 4.59P0.1, 5.02P1) fps -60%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
7.5 (2.3min, 2.32P0.1, 2.44P1) fps -78%
1920x1080 High Preset
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
29.9 fps +3%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28.9 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.8 - 29.9, n=19)
24 fps -17%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
23.3 (16.6min, 16.7P0.1, 18.3P1) fps -19%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
13.3 fps -54%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
11.7 (3.43min, 3.51P0.1, 3.99P1) fps -60%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
29.2 fps +4%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.4 - 29.2, n=19)
23.4 fps -16%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
22.8 (15.6min, 15.9P0.1, 17.6P1) fps -19%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
12.6 fps -55%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
11.2 (3.28min, 3.43P0.1, 4.16P1) fps -60%
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
163.3 (152min) fps
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
160.7 (126min) fps -2%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
153.5 (7.45min, 37.4P0.1, 101.7P1) fps -6%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
148.1 (121min) fps -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
140.2 (26.9min, 57.9P0.1, 101.9P1) fps -14%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (74 - 163.3, n=37)
136.9 fps -16%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
119.6 (6.3min, 25P0.1, 75.7P1) fps -27%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
102 fps -38%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
98.2 (84min) fps -40%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
98.1 (22.4min, 35.3P0.1, 58.9P1) fps -40%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
85.6 (16min, 36.2P0.1, 60.2P1) fps -48%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
73 (13.3min, 24.8P0.1, 40.9P1) fps -55%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
67.6 (60min) fps -59%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
53.5 (3.95min, 22.4P0.1, 28.2P1) fps -67%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
49.7 (44min) fps -70%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
103.8 (96min) fps +3%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
101.1 (94min) fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
97.1 (91min) fps -4%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (47.7 - 103.8, n=21)
89.6 fps -11%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
88.3 (13.2min, 42.1P0.1, 48.9P1) fps -13%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
85.3 (27.9min, 47.1P0.1, 65.3P1) fps -16%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
85.1 (38.5min, 56.2P0.1, 65P1) fps -16%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
64 (22.4min, 30.3P0.1, 37.4P1) fps -37%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
54.1 (16.8min, 34.9P0.1, 43.7P1) fps -46%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
52.6 (38min) fps -48%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
46.7 (8.69min, 18.5P0.1, 37P1) fps -54%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
43.3 (38min) fps -57%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
29.8 (18min) fps -71%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
52.2 (48min) fps +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
51.9 (46min) fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
49 (45min) fps -6%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
46.8 (28.7min, 32.6P0.1, 37.1P1) fps -10%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
46.2 (14.1min, 14.7P0.1, 16P1) fps -11%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (21.3 - 52.2, n=44)
44.4 fps -14%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
41.7 (8.33min, 17.3P0.1, 31.2P1) fps -20%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
33.5 fps -35%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
32.2 (15.4min, 16P0.1, 18.1P1) fps -38%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
26 (20.8min, 21.4P0.1, 22.6P1) fps -50%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
25.7 (24min) fps -50%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
23.7 (12.8min, 13.7P0.1, 19P1) fps -54%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
22 (20min) fps -58%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
17.9 (9.39min, 9.64P0.1, 9.9P1) fps -66%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
16.7 (14min) fps -68%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
33.3 (29min) fps +4%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
32.4 (8.42min, 11.8P0.1, 17.7P1) fps +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
32 (28min) fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
30.5 (28min) fps -5%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (14.3 - 36, n=46)
28.1 fps -12%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
27.1 (13.6min, 15.7P0.1, 17.4P1) fps -15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
24.5 (6.26min, 10.2P0.1, 14.1P1) fps -23%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
20.8 (18min, 19P1) fps -35%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
17.8 (15min) fps -44%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
17.6 (14.7min, 14.7P0.1, 15.4P1) fps -45%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.9 fps -47%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
15.3 (1.624min, 3.11P0.1, 10.2P1) fps -52%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
14.9 (9.2min, 9.5P0.1, 12.3P1) fps -53%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
13.7 (12min) fps -57%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
8.2 (7min) fps -74%
Far Cry 5
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
89 (77min) fps
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
88 (77min) fps -1%
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
88 (77min) fps -1%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
84 (73min) fps -6%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
79 (39min) fps -11%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
72 (63min) fps -19%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (42 - 89, n=40)
71.8 fps -19%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
71 (62min) fps -20%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
62 (56min) fps -30%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
58 (52min) fps -35%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
46 (37min) fps -48%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
45 (40min) fps -49%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
42 (36min) fps -53%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
54 (48min) fps +6%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
51 (45min) fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
50 (45min) fps -2%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
49 (44min) fps -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
45 (40min) fps -12%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
44 (39min) fps -14%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (22 - 54, n=42)
42.2 fps -17%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
33 (29min) fps -35%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
30 (26min) fps -41%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
29 (27min) fps -43%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
29 (26min) fps -43%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
25 (22min) fps -51%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
20 (17min) fps -61%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
49 (43min) fps +4%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
47 (42min) fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
46 (41min) fps -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
42 (34min) fps -11%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
42 (33min) fps -11%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (21 - 49, n=42)
38.9 fps -17%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
38 (31min) fps -19%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
30 (26min) fps -36%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28 (20min) fps -40%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
27 (25min) fps -43%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
27 (24min) fps -43%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
22 (19min) fps -53%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
19 (16min) fps -60%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
47 (41min) fps +4%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
45 (40min) fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
44 (39min) fps -2%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
41 (33min) fps -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
39 (31min) fps -13%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (21 - 47, n=42)
37 fps -18%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
33 (29min) fps -27%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
27 (24min) fps -40%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
27 (20min) fps -40%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26 (23min) fps -42%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
25 (23min) fps -44%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
21 (17min) fps -53%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
17 (15min) fps -62%
Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
159.7 (142.1min) fps +5%
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
159.5 (137.7min) fps +5%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
156.9 (136.5min) fps +3%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
151.9 (101.9min) fps
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
144.9 (123.5min) fps -5%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (103.7 - 163.1, n=51)
134 fps -12%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
129.5 (112.6min) fps -15%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
124 (8.9min) fps -18%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
119.5 (88.5min) fps -21%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
115.8 (101.2min) fps -24%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
113.8 (8.3min) fps -25%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
112.3 (96.7min) fps -26%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
109.8 (85min) fps -28%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
106.5 (61min) fps -30%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
102.5 (56.5min) fps -33%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
99.7 (85.3min) fps -34%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
130.1 (91.5min) fps
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
126.5 (104.4min) fps -3%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
122.9 (103min) fps -6%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
121.1 (100.6min) fps -7%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
108.6 (88.6min) fps -17%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (84.3 - 130.1, n=51)
108 fps -17%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
107.9 (92.8min) fps -17%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
104 (89min) fps -20%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
92.6 (61.2min) fps -29%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
89.4 (71.3min) fps -31%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
87.4 (72.1min) fps -33%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
86.4 (68.3min) fps -34%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
80.6 (61.8min) fps -38%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
80.6 (59.3min) fps -38%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
80.2 (63.9min) fps -38%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
70.1 (61.4min) fps -46%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
98.8 (88.1min) fps 0%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
98.8 (80.5min) fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
95.5 (85.2min) fps -3%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
88.3 (74.1min) fps -11%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
81.6 (72.3min) fps -17%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (54.9 - 98.8, n=51)
79.8 fps -19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
79 (48.2min) fps -20%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
72.3 (46.1min) fps -27%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
70 (63.6min) fps -29%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
67.7 (59.9min) fps -31%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
67.6 (58.9min) fps -32%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
67 (60.7min) fps -32%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
65.5 (56.1min) fps -34%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
60.5 (53.8min) fps -39%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
50.5 (43.1min) fps -49%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
36.1 (33min) fps -63%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
90.4 (71.8min) fps
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
88.5 (78.9min) fps -2%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
85.6 (74.9min) fps -5%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
82.25 (71min) fps -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
74.6 (47.1min) fps -17%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (51.3 - 91.2, n=51)
72 fps -20%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
70.2 (61.6min) fps -22%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
68.3 (45.5min) fps -24%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
63.7 (56min) fps -30%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
60.8 (54.4min) fps -33%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
60.6 (54.2min) fps -33%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
60.5 (52.3min) fps -33%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
58.6 (51.6min) fps -35%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
53.1 (47.2min) fps -41%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
47.6 (40.4min) fps -47%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
32.8 (29.4min) fps -64%
X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
66.3 fps +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
65.9 fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
64.9 fps -2%
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
64.2 fps -3%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
61.5 fps -7%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
53.4 fps -19%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
57.8 fps -12%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
57.1 fps -13%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
54.6 fps -17%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
54.1 fps -18%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (39 - 69.6, n=53)
53 fps -20%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
52.6 fps -20%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
51.8 fps -21%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
49.8 fps -24%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
40.4 fps -39%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
38.8 fps -41%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
49.7 fps +4%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
47.8 fps 0%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
47.8 fps
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
46.9 fps -2%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
41.3 fps -14%
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
46.3 fps -3%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
45 fps -6%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
43.5 fps -9%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
41 fps -14%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
39.9 fps -17%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
39.8 fps -17%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
39.3 fps -18%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (26.2 - 48.2, n=53)
38.6 fps -19%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
38.5 fps -19%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
27.3 fps -43%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
26.3 fps -45%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
40.5 fps +2%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
39.9 fps +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
39.6 fps
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
38.7 fps -2%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
38.2 fps -4%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
37 fps -7%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
36.5 fps -8%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
35.4 fps -11%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
34.8 fps -12%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
34.2 fps -14%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
33.8 fps -15%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
33.2 fps -16%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (24.5 - 40.7, n=52)
32.5 fps -18%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
25.1 fps -37%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
23.3 fps -41%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
84.5 fps +6%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
79.7 fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
76.5 fps -4%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (41.1 - 84.5, n=48)
70.1 fps -12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
69.1 fps -13%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
67.6 fps -15%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
54.4 fps -32%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
52.8 fps -34%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
48.3 fps -39%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
45.6 fps -43%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
45.3 fps -43%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
45.1 fps -43%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
44.4 fps -44%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
39.2 fps -51%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
35.2 fps -56%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
26.3 fps -67%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
23 fps -71%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
40.9 fps +2%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
40.2 fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
38.2 fps -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
36.8 fps -8%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
35.8 fps -11%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (21 - 40.9, n=49)
35.1 fps -13%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
33.5 fps -17%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
25.3 fps -37%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 fps -38%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
24.7 fps -39%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
24.3 fps -40%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
24.3 fps -40%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
22.4 fps -44%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
20.5 fps -49%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
18 fps -55%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
13.3 fps -67%
1920x1080 High Quality
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
30.8 fps +5%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
29.4 fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28.5 fps -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
26.4 fps -10%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (15.9 - 30.8, n=50)
26.3 fps -11%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
26.2 fps -11%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
21.8 fps -26%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
20.1 fps -32%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
19.5 fps -34%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
18.2 fps -38%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
17.9 fps -39%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
17.4 fps -41%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
15.9 fps -46%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
14.6 fps -50%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
13.1 fps -55%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
9.3 fps -68%
Strange Brigade
1280x720 lowest AF:1
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
175.9 (26.4min, 151.8P1) fps +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
173.7 (119.2min, 145.2P1) fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
163.2 (109.1min, 139.7P1) fps -6%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (74.1 - 175.9, n=45)
149.4 fps -14%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
148.3 (94.8min, 128.6P1) fps -15%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
131.8 (15.2min, 64.5P1) fps -24%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
124.9 (5min, 56.5P1) fps -28%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
120.2 (78.3min, 104.5P1) fps -31%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
100.9 (66.3min, 84.2P1) fps -42%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
99 (21.7min, 36.5P1) fps -43%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
98.7 (22.6min, 38.1P1) fps -43%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
92.3 (16.8min, 31.7P1) fps -47%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
79.8 (20.7min, 69.9P1) fps -54%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
78.4 (57.8min, 65.5P1) fps -55%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
74.1 (35.8min, 62.6P1) fps -57%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
61.4 (14.5min, 18.6P1) fps -65%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
56.5 (13.2min, 17.2P1) fps -67%
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
70.9 (5min, 61.9P1) fps +3%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
68.9 (55.3min, 59.1P1) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
67.8 (51.1min, 59.2P1) fps -2%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
66.9 (26.4min, 57.6P1) fps -3%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
65.6 (52.2min, 57P1) fps -5%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (31.7 - 70.9, n=45)
62.3 fps -10%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
59.7 (48.3min, 52.5P1) fps -13%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
57 (8.9min, 48.8P1) fps -17%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
43 (36.6min, 37.4P1) fps -38%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
42.5 (5.6min, 23.9P1) fps -38%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
39.5 (14.3min, 21.5P1) fps -43%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
39.4 (14.1min, 23P1) fps -43%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
38.8 (24.2min, 34.3P1) fps -44%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
32.4 (15.3min, 28.3P1) fps -53%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
31.4 (26.4min, 27.4P1) fps -54%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
23.1 (6.7min, 11.2P1) fps -66%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
22.4 (6.3min, 10.3P1) fps -67%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
60.6 (32.5min, 47.4P1) fps +3%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
58.7 (43.2min, 45.6P1) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
57.2 (43.9min, 47P1) fps -3%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
56.9 (26.1min, 43.8P1) fps -3%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
55.6 (39.2min, 42.9P1) fps -5%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (27.3 - 60.6, n=45)
52.7 fps -10%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
50.4 (24.4min, 40.8P1) fps -14%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
50 (20.4min, 38.8P1) fps -15%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
35.9 (28.5min, 29.1P1) fps -39%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
33.8 (7min, 18.3P1) fps -42%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
32.4 (23.8min, 25.8P1) fps -45%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
32.2 (8.9min, 14.3P1) fps -45%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
32 (8.4min, 15.8P1) fps -45%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
26.8 (14.8min, 19.1P1) fps -54%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
26.7 (16.9min, 20.7P1) fps -55%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
17.7 (5min, 5.99P1) fps -70%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
17.2 (5min, 5.39P1) fps -71%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
52.1 (5.2min, 33.8P1) fps +3%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
50.8 (24.5min, 33.9P1) fps
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
49.2 (21.9min, 29.5P1) fps -3%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
48.2 (23.8min, 32P1) fps -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
46.7 (6.9min, 17.1P1) fps -8%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (23.5 - 52.1, n=46)
45 fps -11%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
43 (20min, 25.4P1) fps -15%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
41 (6.8min, 14.4P1) fps -19%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
29.6 (21min, 24.7P1) fps -42%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
27.4 (19.7min, 22.4P1) fps -46%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26.9 (5.4min, 7.47P1) fps -47%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26.1 (5.3min, 8.13P1) fps -49%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
25.8 (5.1min, 7.06P1) fps -49%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
23.1 (5.3min, 7.5P1) fps -55%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
22.7 (11.3min, 12.5P1) fps -55%
GMK NucBox M4
Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
16.4 (5min, 5P1) fps -68%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
15.9 (5min, 5P1) fps -69%
F1 22
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
186.7 (148min, 125P1) fps +28%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
167.9 (135min, 113P1) fps +15%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
164.2 (129min, 114P1) fps +13%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
145.7 (108min, 89P1) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (85.4 - 186.7, n=25)
144.5 fps -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
136 (111min, 98P1) fps -7%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
135.5 (115min, 97P1) fps -7%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
107.3 (86min, 79P1) fps -26%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
89.3 (78min, 72P1) fps -39%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
80.1 (65min, 63P1) fps -45%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
77.6 (63min, 62P1) fps -47%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
76 (60min, 61P1) fps -48%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
75.5 (58min, 58P1) fps -48%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
64.5 (55min, 54P1) fps -56%
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
109.9 (95min, 85P1) fps +11%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
99 (86min, 76P1) fps
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
94.8 (66min, 55P1) fps -4%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
94.6 (81min, 71P1) fps -4%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (47 - 109.9, n=31)
85.1 fps -14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
84.9 (65min, 66P1) fps -14%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
80.3 (68min, 65P1) fps -19%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
58.3 (43min, 42P1) fps -41%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
48.8 (40min, 38P1) fps -51%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
47.6 (39min, 39P1) fps -52%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
46.3 (40min, 38P1) fps -53%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
45.6 (37min, 29P1) fps -54%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
45.2 (37min, 36P1) fps -54%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
35.7 (31min, 27P1) fps -64%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
95 (81min, 76P1) fps +11%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
85.9 (73min, 68P1) fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
85.7 (72min, 66P1) fps 0%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
85.4 (71min, 65P1) fps -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
77 (68min, 64P1) fps -10%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (41.5 - 95, n=31)
75.2 fps -12%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
70.3 (55min, 51P1) fps -18%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
52.3 (41min, 39P1) fps -39%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
43.4 (36min, 36P1) fps -49%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
43.1 (36min, 35P1) fps -50%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
42.4 (33min, 35P1) fps -51%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
31.7 (28min, 27P1) fps -63%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
41.2 (35min, 34P1) fps -52%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
40.6 (33min, 29P1) fps -53%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
32.3 (28min, 25P1) fps -62%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
70.6 (60min, 59P1) fps +8%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
65.6 (54min, 52P1) fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
63 (48min, 51P1) fps -4%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
62.6 (48min, 38P1) fps -5%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (31.7 - 70.6, n=31)
56.1 fps -14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
55.9 (48min, 46P1) fps -15%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
52 (38min, 39P1) fps -21%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
37.2 (31min, 29P1) fps -43%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
32.1 (25min, 22P1) fps -51%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
31.7 (27min, 26P1) fps -52%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
31.2 (27min, 25P1) fps -52%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
30.1 (25min, 24P1) fps -54%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
23.8 (20min, 18P1) fps -64%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
24.9 (20min, 19P1) fps +39%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
24 (20min, 20P1) fps +34%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
23.2 (20min, 18P1) fps +30%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
22.5 (19min, 19P1) fps +26%
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
19.2 (14min, 14P1) fps +7%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
17.9 (13min, 13P1) fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
17.7 (13min, 13P1) fps -1%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
16.8 (13min, 13P1) fps -6%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (9.92 - 19.2, n=23)
15.6 fps -13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
14 (10min, 10P1) fps -22%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
13 (9min, 9P1) fps -27%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
9.25 (7min, 7P1) fps -48%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
8.43 (6min, 6P1) fps -53%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
80.6 (51.6min) fps +11%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
73.4 (60.6min) fps +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
72.6 (60.1min) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (53.6 - 80.6, n=17)
66.8 fps -8%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
58.8 (48.8min) fps -19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
47.6 (39min) fps -34%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
31.3 (24.7min) fps -57%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
31.1 (24min) fps -57%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
24.4 (12.7min) fps -66%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
16.7 (12.5min) fps -77%
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
47.9 (37.5min) fps +9%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
44 (37.6min) fps 0%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
43.8 (37.3min) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (30.8 - 52.1, n=31)
40.5 fps -8%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
34.8 (29.9min) fps -21%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
34.3 (29.1min) fps -22%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
24.3 (20.5min) fps -45%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
18.2 (14.1min) fps -58%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
18.2 (14.7min) fps -58%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
13.8 (6.57min) fps -68%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
9.3 (7.27min) fps -79%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
37.5 (30.6min) fps +9%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
34.5 (29.8min) fps
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
33.7 (28.3min) fps -2%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (16.3 - 37.5, n=29)
30.9 fps -10%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
27.9 (24.4min) fps -19%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
27.2 (23.6min) fps -21%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
23.8 (18.8min) fps -31%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
18.1 (15.7min) fps -48%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
14.7 (12.5min) fps -57%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
14.5 (12min) fps -58%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
10.9 (8.08min) fps -68%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
7 (5.72min) fps -80%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
29.6 (23.3min) fps +9%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
27.1 (22.6min) fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.8 - 29.6, n=30)
24.6 fps -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
24 (20.6min) fps -11%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
22.4 (15.6min) fps -17%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
21.3 (18.4min) fps -21%
AcePC Wizbox AI
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
17.8 (11.8min) fps -34%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
12.8 (10.9min) fps -53%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
12.2 (10.3min) fps -55%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
11.6 (10min) fps -57%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
9.17 (6.25min) fps -66%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
6.1 (4.98min) fps -77%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
25.8 (19.9min) fps +10%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
23.4 (19min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
21.4 (17.8min) fps -9%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (11.5 - 26.3, n=25)
21.2 fps -9%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
20.4 (14.2min) fps -13%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
18.1 (15.3min) fps -23%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
11.5 (9.81min) fps -51%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
10.9 (9.33min) fps -53%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA
Intel Core i5-13500, Intel UHD Graphics 770
5.2 (4.4min) fps -78%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12)
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
142.1 fps +11%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
140.6 fps +10%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
130.8 fps +2%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
127.9 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (62.6 - 151.2, n=21)
116.8 fps -9%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
108.4 fps -15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
96.1 fps -25%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
80.8 fps -37%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
79.2 fps -38%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
76.6 fps -40%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
57.7 fps -55%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
57.1 fps -55%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
56.5 fps -56%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
54.5 fps -57%
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12)
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
77.7 fps +7%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
72.8 fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
71.6 fps -2%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
62 fps -15%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (34.3 - 77.7, n=21)
61.5 fps -16%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
57.9 fps -20%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
54.6 fps -25%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
53 fps -27%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
40 fps -45%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
38 fps -48%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
37.7 fps -48%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
34 fps -53%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
32.3 fps -56%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
27.3 fps -62%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12)
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
55.9 fps +6%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
52.8 fps
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
52 fps -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
45 fps -15%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (28.4 - 55.9, n=21)
45 fps -15%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
44 fps -17%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
42.5 fps -20%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
40.1 fps -24%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
31.3 fps -41%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
28.9 fps -45%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
28.2 fps -47%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26.4 fps -50%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
25.4 fps -52%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
21.5 fps -59%
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12)
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
37.9 fps +3%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
37.1 fps +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
36.8 fps
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
32.7 fps -11%
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (18.6 - 38.8, n=21)
31.3 fps -15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
29.9 fps -19%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
28.8 fps -22%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
24.1 fps -35%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
20.5 fps -44%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
20.2 fps -45%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
18.1 fps -51%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.7 fps -55%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
15.9 fps -57%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
13.8 fps -62%
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12)
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
30.3 fps +2%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
30 fps +1%
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Radeon 780M
29.8 fps +1%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
29.6 fps
Durchschnittliche AMD Radeon 780M
  (16.5 - 31.3, n=21)
25.8 fps -13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
24.4 fps -18%
Aoostar GEM10
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M
23.1 fps -22%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9
Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
18.4 fps -38%
Maxtang MTN-FP750
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
16.2 fps -45%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
15.6 fps -47%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
13.5 fps -54%
Geekom A5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
13.3 fps -55%
Geekom GT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
13.2 fps -55%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
10.3 fps -65%

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Beelink SER8: Ø52.4 (47-59)
min. mittel hoch max.
The Witcher 3 (2015) 163.3 101.1 51.9 32
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 151.9 130.1 98.8 90.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 79.7 40.2 29.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 65.9 47.8 39.6
Far Cry 5 (2018) 89 51 47 45
Strange Brigade (2018) 173.7 68.9 58.7 50.8
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 72.8 52.8 36.8 29.6
F1 22 (2022) 99 85.9 65.6 17.9
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 41.6 34.8 28.9 28
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 43.8 34.5 27.1 23.4

Emissionen - SER8 unter Last jetzt leiser

System Noise — Slower And More Gradual Fan RPM Changes

Im Leerlauf ist der Lüfter ein paar Dezibel lauter als im SER7. Es ist glücklicherweise nicht laut genug, um in einer typischen Wohnzimmeratmosphäre störend zu sein, aber messtechnisch eine Erhöhung der Lautstärke. Unter Last kehrt sich das Bild aber um, beispielsweise bleibt das SER8 beim Gaming bei gleicher Leistung einen Tick ruhiger. Generell ist der Lautstärkebereich beim SER8 etwas kleiner als beim SER7. Der laute Lüfter beim Gaming war einer unserer Hauptkritikpunkte am SER7 und es ist schön zu sehen, dass sich diesem Punkt im SER8 angenommen wurde.

Lüftergeräuschprofil (Weiß: Hintergrund, Rot: Leerlauf, Blau: 3DMark 06, Orange: Cyberpunk 2077, Grün: Prime95+FurMark-Stress)
Lüftergeräuschprofil (Weiß: Hintergrund, Rot: Leerlauf, Blau: 3DMark 06, Orange: Cyberpunk 2077, Grün: Prime95+FurMark-Stress)

Lautstärkediagramm

Idle
28.8 / 28.8 / 30.5 dB(A)
Last
34.6 / 34.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
leise
40 dB(A)
deutlich hörbar
50 dB(A)
störend
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (aus 15 cm gemessen)   Umgebungsgeräusche: 23.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.534.937.536.434.8252522.822.424.324.3312523.924.827.624.84023.224.123.322.522.15023.924.423.322.725.46327.929.62927.829.28029.226.325.423.825.910025.425.12422.72712522.12320.418.82316021.921.618.915.822.820022.922.52018.122.725023.423.418.715.82431523.824.321.117.924.640024.42419.414.624.250025.425.119.612.225.76302827.922.31128.48002323.217.31123.6100020.420.814.51021.1125024.424.819.39.625.1160025.225.818.59.925.8200022.322.714.31022.7250020.220.813.710.620.9315020.721.614.51121.1400017.219.413.911.317.8500016.819.214.811.615.2630014.316.312.511.613800014.615.612.411.612.41000015.815.812.612.212.61250014.915.312.411.512.4160001514.811.310.712.3SPL34.134.628.823.634.5N1.92.11.10.52median 22.1median 22.5median 17.3median 11.6median 22.7Delta3.83.33.12.44.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseBeelink SER8
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
GMK NucBox K6
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
Geekom GT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
Aoostar GEM10
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
Geräuschentwicklung
1%
-3%
-17%
-13%
-19%
aus / Umgebung *
23.6
24.5
-4%
25.6
-8%
23.2
2%
24.3
-3%
24.3
-3%
Idle min *
28.8
25.1
13%
28.1
2%
31.3
-9%
27.9
3%
36.5
-27%
Idle avg *
28.8
25.1
13%
28.1
2%
31.3
-9%
27.9
3%
36.6
-27%
Idle max *
30.5
25.1
18%
28.1
8%
33.4
-10%
28
8%
36.6
-20%
Last avg *
34.6
35.9
-4%
34.9
-1%
47.5
-37%
43.8
-27%
41.7
-21%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
34.1
45.4
-33%
40.3
-18%
Last max *
34.5
45.4
-32%
42.4
-23%
47.7
-38%
48.5
-41%
40.8
-18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
35.6
36.4
43.6
40.18

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Temperatur

Netzteil erhitzt sich beim Gaming auf über 51 °C
Netzteil erhitzt sich beim Gaming auf über 51 °C

Dadurch, dass es an den sichtbaren Seiten nun weniger Luftgitter gibt, haben wir eigentlich erwartet, dass das SER8 eher wärmer wird als sein Vorgänger. Glücklicherweise ist dem nicht so, die Oberseite bleibt mit nur 33 °C beim Gaming oder anderen längeren Lasten sogar kühler als beim SER7. Die maximale Temperatur ist ein paar Grad höher als beim SER7 oder GTR7, aber nicht wesentlich. Man sollte unbedingt darauf achten, dass sowohl der Lufteingang unterhalb des Gehäuses als auch der Luftausgang an der Rückseite frei bleibt.

Leerlauf (vorne)
Leerlauf (vorne)
Leerlauf (hinten)
Leerlauf (hinten)
Prime95+FurMark-Stress (vorne)
Prime95+FurMark-Stress (vorne)
Prime95+FurMark-Stress (hinten)
Prime95+FurMark-Stress (hinten)

Energiemanagement — Ungefähr wie im Zen 3+

Energieverbrauch

100-W-Netzteil
100-W-Netzteil

Im Leerlauf ist der Verbrauch deutlich niedriger als beim Intel-basierten Geekom GT13 Pro. Allerdings liegt der Verbrauch dann 20 Prozent über dem des GT13 Pro wenn anspruchsvollere Lasten anliegen, im Stresstest mit Prime95 sind es sogar 50 Prozent mehr! Der Ryzen 7 8845HS ist deutlich schneller als der Core i9-13900H im Geekom, sodass der erhöhte Energiebedarf verständlich ist.

Trotz der unterschiedlichen Prozessorgenerationen ist der allgemeine Verbrauch sehr nahe an dem, was wir im letzten Jahr beim GTR7 oder SER7 gemessen haben, was sich auch in den ähnlichen Leistungswerten widerspiegelt. Die Vorteile beim Leistung-pro-Watt-Verhältnis dürften zwischen Zen 3+ und Zen 4 also minimal ausfallen wenn es um traditionelle CPU/GPU-Anwendungen geht.

Wir messen einen temporären Maximalverbrauch von 84 W aus dem relativ kleinen (~7 x 7 x 3 cm) 100-W-Netzteil. Allerdings kann der Verbrauch um weitere 11 W steigen sofern der 65-W-Modus im BIOS aktiv ist.

Verbrauch unter 3DMark 06
Verbrauch unter 3DMark 06
Verbrauch unter Witcher 3 1080p
Verbrauch unter Witcher 3 1080p
Gute Leistungskonstanz: Beim Start von Prime95 steigt der Verbrauch auf 54 W und verbleibt dort
Gute Leistungskonstanz: Beim Start von Prime95 steigt der Verbrauch auf 54 W und verbleibt dort
Prime95+FurMark-Stress bei 10s gestartet
Prime95+FurMark-Stress bei 10s gestartet
Stromverbrauch
Aus / Standbydarklight 0.8 / 1.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.3 / 7.3 / 8.4 Watt
Last midlight 68.2 / 84.3 Watt
 color bar
Legende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Derzeit nutzen wir das Metrahit Energy, ein professionelles TRMS Leistungs-Multimeter und PQ Analysator, für unsere Messungen. Mehr Details zu dem Messgerät finden Sie hier. Alle unsere Testmethoden beschreiben wir in diesem Artikel.
Beelink SER8
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,
Beelink SER7
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,
Beelink GTR7 7840HS
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,
GMK NucBox K6
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000, , x,
Geekom GT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Acer N7000, , x,
Aoostar GEM10
R7 6800H, Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB, , x,
Stromverbrauch
-6%
2%
2%
-42%
-13%
Idle min *
7.3
6.7
8%
5.5
25%
6.7
8%
7.9
-8%
7.3
-0%
Idle avg *
7.3
7.3
-0%
5.8
21%
7
4%
10.3
-41%
8.7
-19%
Idle max *
8.4
11.6
-38%
7.7
8%
7.6
10%
22.3
-165%
10.4
-24%
Last avg *
68.2
64.1
6%
70.6
-4%
74.3
-9%
57.44
16%
67.2
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
75.1
75.8
-1%
79.8
-6%
75
-0%
Last max *
84.3
94.8
-12%
111.8
-33%
85.7
-2%
93.4
-11%
101.6
-21%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
55.9
58.8

* ... kleinere Werte sind besser

Energieverbrauch Cyberpunk / Stress Test

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Beelink SER8 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø84 (81.5-85)
Beelink GTR6 R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø71.7 (68.7-80.4)
Beelink SER8 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø75.1 (73.4-79.2)
Beelink GTR6 R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø69 (65.6-72.5)

Energieverbrauch mit externem Monitor

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Beelink SER8 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø84.2 (83.5-85.2)
Beelink GTR6 R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø70.3 (60.8-77.9)
Beelink SER8 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.9 (75.2-76.8)
Beelink GTR6 R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø68.2 (64.3-74)
Beelink SER8 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø80.3 (75.3-82.8)
Beelink GTR6 R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø70.7 (68-76.7)
Beelink SER8 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.13 (6.52-9.55)
Beelink GTR6 R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø9.04 (8.31-13.1)

Pro

+ frei zugängliche 2x SODIMM und 2x M.2 2280 SSDs
+ relativ leise, auch beim Spielen
+ starke Leistung für die Größe
+ neues, attraktives visuelles Design
+ relativ erschwinglich
+ USB4-Support

Contra

- ausgelassene Frames bei der 4K/60-fps-Videowiedergabe
- ohne Wi-Fi 6E- oder Wi-Fi 7
- 65-W-Modus nicht über Windows zugänglich
- kein Kensington-Schloss oder VESA-Halterung
- wenig Farboptionen

Fazit — Professioneller Look und hervorragende Leistung für den Preis

Im Test: Beelink SER8
Im Test: Beelink SER8

Mini-PCs von Beelink haben sich qualitativ stetig verbessert und der SER8 ist ein gutes Beispiel dafür, was wir vom Hersteller in Zukunft noch erwarten können. Das Redesign lässt das Modell teurer aussehen als es ist, ohne dafür wesentliche Einsparungen an anderen Stellen vorzunehmen. Hier und da sieht man noch etwas Plastik, außerdem fehlen ein paar Funktionen wie Wi-Fi 6E, VESA oder ein Fingerabdruckscanner, aber die Mehrheit der Office-Nutzer dürfte über diese kleinen Schwachstellen hinwegsehen, vor allem angesichts des hochwertigen Äußeren und der sehr guten Leistung.

Durch die lange Abwesenheit von Intel NUC beweist sich Beelink mit dem SER8-Design und dessen KI-ready-Zen-4-CPU als ernstzunehmender Anwärter auf die Krone in dieser Kategorie.

Zwar ist die Leistung eines der Highlights, dennoch ist diese bestenfalls marginal besser als im SER7, zumindest abseits von KI-Anwendungen. Nutzer, die weder Interesse am Co-Pilot noch am neuen Design haben, könnten im kleineren Gehäuse des SER7 oder GMK NucBox K6 das bessere Angebot finden. Für unter $700 ist der SER8 allerdings einer der aktuell besten Mini-PCs und der fortschrittlichste seiner Familie.

Preis und Verfügbarkeit

Direkt bei Beelink kostet das Modell derzeit knapp unter 600 Euro. Bei Amazon werden aktuell 899 Euro fällig, ein heftiger Europa-Aufschlag!

Hinweis: Wir haben unser Rating-System kürzlich aktualisiert und die Ergebnisse von Version 8 sind nicht mit den Ergebnissen von Version 7 vergleichbar. Weitere Informationen dazu sind hier verfügbar.

Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here .

Beelink SER8 - 07.07.2024 v8
Allen Ngo

Gehäuse
87 / 98 → 89%
Konnektivität
58 / 81 → 72%
Gewicht
79%
Leistung Spiele
54 / 80 → 68%
Leistung Anwendungen
86 / 92 → 94%
Lautstärke
87%
Durchschnitt
47%
75%
Mini PC - gewichteter Durchschnitt
Weitere Informationen über unsere Bewertung finden Sie hier.
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
0%
Power Use
74.5%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
22.3%
Total Sustainability Score: 22.8%

Transparenz

Das vorliegende Testmuster wurde dem Autor vom Hersteller oder einem Shop zu Testzwecken leihweise zur Verfügung gestellt. Eine Einflussnahme des Leihstellers auf den Testbericht gab es nicht, der Hersteller hat keine Version des Reviews vor der Veröffentlichung erhalten. Es bestand keine Verpflichtung zur Veröffentlichung.

Preisvergleich

Alle 1 Beträge lesen / Antworten
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Diesen Artikel kommentieren / Antworten
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Tests > Notebook Testberichte > Beelink SER8 im PC-Test: Mac-Mini-inspiriertes Design mit einem AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
Autor: Allen Ngo,  9.07.2024 (Update:  9.07.2024)