Samsung Galaxy A55 Serie
Prozessor: unknown, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 778G 5G, Samsung Exynos Exynos 1480, Samsung Exynos Exynos 9610, Samsung Exynos Exynos 9611Grafikkarte: unknown, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, Qualcomm Adreno 642L, Samsung Xclipse 530
Bildschirm: 6.40 Zoll, 6.50 Zoll, 6.60 Zoll
Gewicht: 0.166kg, 0.169kg, 0.172kg, 0.187kg, 0.189kg, 0.213kg
Preis: 350, 369, 449, 529 Euro
Durchschnitt von 533 Bewertungen (aus 1163 Tests)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Das Samsung Galaxy A50 ist ein Mittelklasse-Smartphone mit anständiger Hardware und Kamera. Die Smartphones der A-Serie bieten in der Regel eine großartige Kamera zu einem günstigeren Preis. Das Galaxy A50 ist keine Ausnahme. Es wurde puristisch, hochwertig und ästhetisch gestaltet. Ob in modernem weiß oder schwarz oder in brillanter Koralle oder blau, der schlanke Körper liegt angenehm in der Hand. Die klassische 3D-Rückseite und der On-Screen-Fingerabdruckscanner sorgen an allen Seiten für glatte, makellose Rundungen. Das Galaxy A50 ist 7,7 mm dick, wiegt 166 g und läuft unter Android 9.0 (Pie). Die Triple-Kamera des Galaxy A50 besteht aus einer Ultra-Wide-Kamera mit einem Sichtfeld von 123 Grad wie das menschliche Auge sowie einer 25-MP-Kamera (F1.7) für helle, klare Fotos den ganzen Tag. Eine 5-MP-Tiefenkamera zum Einstellen der Schärfentiefe vervollständigt das Kamera-Setup. Unabhängig davon, ob Sie ein Foto von Lebensmitteln, Haustieren oder Dingen, die Sie lieben, machen, erkennt und verbessert der Scene Optimizer dieses mithilfe künstlicher Intelligenz für optimale Helligkeit, Sättigung und mehr. Damit wird die Realität so erfasst, wie Sie sie in Erinnerung haben. Das Galaxy A50 ist mit einem 6,4-Zoll-Infinity-U-Display ausgestattet. Das fast rahmenlose Display erstreckt sich von Rand zu Rand. Mit FHD+-Auflösung und AMOLED-Farbe können in ihre Lieblings-vlogs und Livestreams eintauchen. Das Samsung Galaxy A50 wird von einem Exynos 9610 Octa-Core-Prozessor (10 nm) mit 6 GB RAM und 128 GB ROM angetrieben. Das Galaxy A50 bietet biometrische Hightech-Authentifizierung. Der On-Screen-Fingerabdrucksensor erkennt den eindeutigen Fingerabdruck des Benutzers. Damit kann nur der Benutzer das Phone durch einfaches Drücken entsperren. Außerdem sorgen Gesichtserkennung und Samsungs Secure-Folder für sichere Mobilität. Da es sich um ein Samsung-Smartphone handelt, wird es mit einer eigenen Software-Suite ausgeliefert, der One UI. One UI hilft Benutzern, sich auf das zu konzentrieren, was für sie wirklich wichtig ist. Hardware und Software arbeiten zusammen, damit Inhalte und Funktionen schneller verfügbar sind. Der Nachtmodus sorgt für ein angenehme Nutzung im Dunkeln. Dank klarer und intuitiver Darstellung wird die Verwendung des Phones zur Selbstverständlichkeit. Ein 4.000-mAh-Akku versorgt das Gerät den ganzen Tag über mit Strom, sodass Benutzer streamen, teilen und spielen können. Wurde zuviel Energie verbraucht, kann das Galaxy A50 dank 15-W-Fast-Charging schnell wieder aufgeladen werden. Insgesamt ist das Galaxy A50 eine sehr gute Wahl für preisbewusste Benutzer, die Samsungs Benutzeroberfläche mögen. Die großartige Kamera und das Display machen es zu einem starken Konkurrenten unter anderen Geräten der gleicher Preisklasse. Hands-On-Artikel von Jagadisa RajarathnamAusstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A50Prozessor: Samsung Exynos Exynos 9610
Grafikkarte: ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Bildschirm: 6.40 Zoll, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.166kg
Preis: 350 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Triple-Kamera und heller AMOLED-Screen sollen Käufer vom Mittelklasse-Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A50 überzeugen. Ob Samsung auch wirklich ein überzeugendes Gesamtpaket zu einem fairen Preis geschnürt hat, das erfahren Sie im Test.
Quelle: Computerbild Archive.org version
Samsung kann durchaus günstig: großes OLED-Panel mit guter Schärfe, schickes Design und eine zumindest bei Tageslicht ordentliche Triple-Kamera. Das Galaxy A50 ist ein interessanter Preiskracher und eines der Highlights in der Mittelklasse. (Note 2,6 nach bis Ende 2019 gültigem Testverfahren.)
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: Computerbild Archive.org version
Samsung kann durchaus günstig: großes OLED-Panel mit guter Schärfe, schickes Design und eine zumindest bei Tageslicht ordentliche Triple-Kamera. Das Galaxy A50 ist ein interessanter Preiskracher und eines der Highlights in der Mittelklasse. (Note 2,6 nach bis Ende 2019 gültigem Testverfahren.)
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: Chip.de Archive.org version
Mit dem Samsung Galaxy A50 setzt der südkoreanische Hersteller seine sehr beliebte Reihe von Mittelklasse-Handys fort. Das Smartphone zeigt im Test einige Highlights, wie das schöne OLED-Display und den großen Speicher. In fast allen anderen Bereichen bewegt sich das A50 in der gehobenen Mittelklasse und sollte die meisten Nutzer zufriedenstellen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 90% Ausstattung: 87% Bildschirm: 93% Mobilität: 92%
Quelle: Chip.de Archive.org version
Mit dem Samsung Galaxy A50 setzt der südkoreanische Hersteller seine sehr beliebte Reihe von Mittelklasse-Handys fort. Das Smartphone zeigt im Test einige Highlights, wie das schöne OLED-Display und den großen Speicher. In fast allen anderen Bereichen bewegt sich das A50 in der gehobenen Mittelklasse und sollte die meisten Nutzer zufriedenstellen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 90% Ausstattung: 87% Bildschirm: 93% Mobilität: 92%
Quelle: Curved Archive.org version
Neben der ansprechenden Größe und dem leistungsstarken Akku begeisterte mich beim A50 auch die Kamera. Natürlich hat das Mittelklassemodell nicht ganz so viele Features und Funktionen zu bieten wie ein Flaggschiff oder auch seine größeren Brüder. Auch liest man oft Rezensionen, nach denen die Smartphonekamera schwächeln soll.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.10.2019
Quelle: Curved Archive.org version
Neben der ansprechenden Größe und dem leistungsstarken Akku begeisterte mich beim A50 auch die Kamera. Natürlich hat das Mittelklassemodell nicht ganz so viele Features und Funktionen zu bieten wie ein Flaggschiff oder auch seine größeren Brüder. Auch liest man oft Rezensionen, nach denen die Smartphonekamera schwächeln soll.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.10.2019
Quelle: PCtipp.ch Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A50 ist ein solides Mittelklasse-Smartphone, das genügend Leistung und Funktionalität für den Preis liefert. Besonders das Display und der starke Akku überzeugen. Kombiniert mit einer ansprechenden Optik, sammelt das A50 so einige Punkte für sich. Abzüge gibt es für den langsamen Fingerabdrucksensor, die vorinstallierte Bloatware sowie den fehlenden Wasser- und Staubschutz.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.07.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: PCtipp.ch Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A50 ist ein solides Mittelklasse-Smartphone, das genügend Leistung und Funktionalität für den Preis liefert. Besonders das Display und der starke Akku überzeugen. Kombiniert mit einer ansprechenden Optik, sammelt das A50 so einige Punkte für sich. Abzüge gibt es für den langsamen Fingerabdrucksensor, die vorinstallierte Bloatware sowie den fehlenden Wasser- und Staubschutz.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.07.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Curved Archive.org version
Mein Held, weil es beweist, dass es nicht immer das Premium-Smartphone braucht, um einen "durchschnittlichen" User glücklich zu machen. Ich selbst habe zwar aufgrund meiner Arbeit viel mit hochkarätigen Flaggschiffen zu tun, bleibe im Privatgebrauch allerdings meinem iPhone 6 noch so lange treu, bis es endgültig den Geist aufgibt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.06.2019
Quelle: Curved Archive.org version
Mein Held, weil es beweist, dass es nicht immer das Premium-Smartphone braucht, um einen "durchschnittlichen" User glücklich zu machen. Ich selbst habe zwar aufgrund meiner Arbeit viel mit hochkarätigen Flaggschiffen zu tun, bleibe im Privatgebrauch allerdings meinem iPhone 6 noch so lange treu, bis es endgültig den Geist aufgibt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.06.2019
Quelle: Area DVD Archive.org version
Samsung setzt mit diesem Mittelklasse-Smartphone, das man online für unter 300 Euro erwerben kann, ein kleines Ausrufezeichen, denn das Full Front Display mit integriertem Fingerprintscanner ist ein Alleinstellungsmerkmal in dieser Preisklasse. Ohnehin ist der Touchscreen qualitativ exzellent.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.06.2019
Quelle: Area DVD Archive.org version
Samsung setzt mit diesem Mittelklasse-Smartphone, das man online für unter 300 Euro erwerben kann, ein kleines Ausrufezeichen, denn das Full Front Display mit integriertem Fingerprintscanner ist ein Alleinstellungsmerkmal in dieser Preisklasse. Ohnehin ist der Touchscreen qualitativ exzellent.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.06.2019
Quelle: Connect - 7/19
Gute Zeiten für Preisfüchse: In der unteren Smartphone-Mittelklasse finden sich mittlerweile echte Schmuckstücke. Jetzt legt Samsung mit seinem nagelneuen Galaxy A50 für 349 Euro einen starken Konkurrenten in die Regale.
Einzeltest, online nicht verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.06.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Ausstattung: 68% Mobilität: 96% Ergonomie: 72%
Quelle: Connect - 7/19
Gute Zeiten für Preisfüchse: In der unteren Smartphone-Mittelklasse finden sich mittlerweile echte Schmuckstücke. Jetzt legt Samsung mit seinem nagelneuen Galaxy A50 für 349 Euro einen starken Konkurrenten in die Regale.
Einzeltest, online nicht verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.06.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Ausstattung: 68% Mobilität: 96% Ergonomie: 72%
Quelle: Tech Stage Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A50 punktet vor allem mit seinem schicken Design, dem tollen AMOLED-Display und viel Speicher. Hinzu kommt eine zumindest bei Licht ordentliche Kamera und ein guter Akku. Ausreichend Power hat das Mittelklasse-Smartphone ebenfalls und auch die Telefonqualität hat Hersteller Samsung nicht vernachlässigt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.05.2019
Quelle: Tech Stage Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A50 punktet vor allem mit seinem schicken Design, dem tollen AMOLED-Display und viel Speicher. Hinzu kommt eine zumindest bei Licht ordentliche Kamera und ein guter Akku. Ausreichend Power hat das Mittelklasse-Smartphone ebenfalls und auch die Telefonqualität hat Hersteller Samsung nicht vernachlässigt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.05.2019
Quelle: Netzwelt Archive.org version
Fingerabdrucksensor im Display, Triple-Kamera, großer Speicher, üppig dimensionierter Akku - für einen Preis von 349 Euro bietet das Galaxy A50 zahlreiche Vorzüge, für die ihr bei anderen Herstellern weitaus mehr bezahlen müsst. Leider trüben aber vor allem zwei große Macken den guten Gesamteindruck.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.05.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Ausstattung: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Netzwelt Archive.org version
Fingerabdrucksensor im Display, Triple-Kamera, großer Speicher, üppig dimensionierter Akku - für einen Preis von 349 Euro bietet das Galaxy A50 zahlreiche Vorzüge, für die ihr bei anderen Herstellern weitaus mehr bezahlen müsst. Leider trüben aber vor allem zwei große Macken den guten Gesamteindruck.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.05.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Ausstattung: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Pit Archive.org version
Mit der neuen Generation der Galaxy-A-Reihe hat Samsung großartige Arbeit geleistet. Das Galaxy A50 bietet alles, was man von einem guten Mittelklasse-Smartphone erwartet. Der südkoreanische Hersteller hat mit der Triple-Kamera und einem in das Display integrierten Fingerabdrucksensor sogar an einige Premium-Features gedacht.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Pit Archive.org version
Mit der neuen Generation der Galaxy-A-Reihe hat Samsung großartige Arbeit geleistet. Das Galaxy A50 bietet alles, was man von einem guten Mittelklasse-Smartphone erwartet. Der südkoreanische Hersteller hat mit der Triple-Kamera und einem in das Display integrierten Fingerabdrucksensor sogar an einige Premium-Features gedacht.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Netzwelt Archive.org version
Fingerabdrucksensor im Display, Triple-Kamera, großer Speicher, üppig dimensionierter Akku - für einen Preis von 349 Euro bietet das Galaxy A50 zahlreiche Vorzüge, für die ihr bei anderen Herstellern weitaus mehr bezahlen müsst. Leider trüben aber vor allem zwei große Macken den guten Gesamteindruck.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Ausstattung: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Chip.de Archive.org version
Mit dem Samsung Galaxy A50 setzt der südkoreanische Hersteller seine sehr beliebte Reihe von Mittelklasse-Handys fort. Das Smartphone zeigt im Test einige Highlights, wie das schöne OLED-Display und den großen Speicher. In fast allen anderen Bereichen bewegt sich das A50 in der gehobenen Mittelklasse und sollte die meisten Nutzer zufriedenstellen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 83% Ausstattung: 77% Bildschirm: 88% Mobilität: 86%
Quelle: Netzwelt Archive.org version
Fingerabdrucksensor im Display, Triple-Kamera, großer Speicher, üppig dimensionierter Akku - für einen Preis von 349 Euro bietet das Galaxy A50 zahlreiche Vorzüge, für die ihr bei anderen Herstellern weitaus mehr bezahlen müsst. Leider trüben aber vor allem zwei große Macken den guten Gesamteindruck.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Ausstattung: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Chip.de Archive.org version
Mit dem Samsung Galaxy A50 setzt der südkoreanische Hersteller seine sehr beliebte Reihe von Mittelklasse-Handys fort. Das Smartphone zeigt im Test einige Highlights, wie das schöne OLED-Display und den großen Speicher. In fast allen anderen Bereichen bewegt sich das A50 in der gehobenen Mittelklasse und sollte die meisten Nutzer zufriedenstellen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 83% Ausstattung: 77% Bildschirm: 88% Mobilität: 86%
Quelle: Inside Handy Archive.org version
Mit dem Galaxy A50 ist Samsung eine Mischung aus modern aussehendem Smartphone und starker Leistung mit aktuellem Android-System geglückt. Sowohl die Verarbeitung als auch das Design konnten im Test überzeugen. Nur bei der Materialwahl gibt es Abstriche, denn beim Galaxy A50 heißt es Kunststoff statt Glas und Metall.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Inside Handy Archive.org version
Mit dem Galaxy A50 ist Samsung eine Mischung aus modern aussehendem Smartphone und starker Leistung mit aktuellem Android-System geglückt. Sowohl die Verarbeitung als auch das Design konnten im Test überzeugen. Nur bei der Materialwahl gibt es Abstriche, denn beim Galaxy A50 heißt es Kunststoff statt Glas und Metall.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A50 ist ein gutes Smartphone mit ein paar Schwächen. Besonders positiv zu erwähnen ist das schöne 6,4 Zoll AMOLED-Display, das in keiner Hinsicht Raum zur Kritik lässt. Auch die Kamera und der Akku des Smartphones können gute Ergebnisse liefern. Hinsichtlich der Performance gibt es einen deutlichen Unterschied zu anderen Top-Modellen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A50 ist ein gutes Smartphone mit ein paar Schwächen. Besonders positiv zu erwähnen ist das schöne 6,4 Zoll AMOLED-Display, das in keiner Hinsicht Raum zur Kritik lässt. Auch die Kamera und der Akku des Smartphones können gute Ergebnisse liefern. Hinsichtlich der Performance gibt es einen deutlichen Unterschied zu anderen Top-Modellen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Netzwelt Archive.org version
Fingerabdrucksensor im Display, Triple-Kamera, großer Speicher, üppig dimensionierter Akku - für einen Preis von 349 Euro bietet das Galaxy A50 zahlreiche Vorzüge, für die ihr bei anderen Herstellern weitaus mehr bezahlen müsst. Samsung hat hier aus unserer Sicht einen potenziellen Verkaufsschlager in der Hinterhand. Wir sind gespannt, wie sich das Galaxy A50 im ausführlichen Test schlägt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.03.2019
Quelle: Netzwelt Archive.org version
Fingerabdrucksensor im Display, Triple-Kamera, großer Speicher, üppig dimensionierter Akku - für einen Preis von 349 Euro bietet das Galaxy A50 zahlreiche Vorzüge, für die ihr bei anderen Herstellern weitaus mehr bezahlen müsst. Samsung hat hier aus unserer Sicht einen potenziellen Verkaufsschlager in der Hinterhand. Wir sind gespannt, wie sich das Galaxy A50 im ausführlichen Test schlägt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.03.2019
Quelle: Android Pit Archive.org version
Mit dieser neuen Generation der Galaxy-A-Serie scheint Samsung gute Arbeit geleistet zu haben. Das Galaxy A50 und Galaxy A30 bieten alles, was man von einem guten Mittelklasse-Smartphone erwartet und die Akkulaufzeit dürfte mit dem großen Akku ein besonderer Pluspunkt sein.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.03.2019
Quelle: Android Pit Archive.org version
Mit dieser neuen Generation der Galaxy-A-Serie scheint Samsung gute Arbeit geleistet zu haben. Das Galaxy A50 und Galaxy A30 bieten alles, was man von einem guten Mittelklasse-Smartphone erwartet und die Akkulaufzeit dürfte mit dem großen Akku ein besonderer Pluspunkt sein.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.03.2019
Quelle: Inside Handy Archive.org version
Beim Design vertagt Samsung die Revolution. Eine winzige Notch und ein in Regenbogenfarben schimmerndes Heck sind die herausstechenden Eigenschaften. Die rückseitige Fläche umschließt das Smartphone bis kurz vors Display, was den Rahmen sehr schmal werden lässt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.02.2019
Quelle: Inside Handy Archive.org version
Beim Design vertagt Samsung die Revolution. Eine winzige Notch und ein in Regenbogenfarben schimmerndes Heck sind die herausstechenden Eigenschaften. Die rückseitige Fläche umschließt das Smartphone bis kurz vors Display, was den Rahmen sehr schmal werden lässt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.02.2019
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
Between the versatile cameras, bloat-free software and rather good gaming performance, the phone will more than suffice for most prospective users. The Samsung Galaxy A50 does it all while offering a really good user experience.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Leistung: 52% Bildschirm: 78% Mobilität: 69%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
Between the versatile cameras, bloat-free software and rather good gaming performance, the phone will more than suffice for most prospective users. The Samsung Galaxy A50 does it all while offering a really good user experience.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Leistung: 52% Bildschirm: 78% Mobilität: 69%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
Between the versatile cameras, bloat-free software and rather good gaming performance, the phone will more than suffice for most prospective users. The Samsung Galaxy A50 does it all while offering a really good user experience.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Leistung: 52% Bildschirm: 78% Mobilität: 69%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
Between the versatile cameras, bloat-free software and rather good gaming performance, the phone will more than suffice for most prospective users. The Samsung Galaxy A50 does it all while offering a really good user experience.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Leistung: 52% Bildschirm: 78% Mobilität: 69%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
Between the versatile cameras, bloat-free software and rather good gaming performance, the phone will more than suffice for most prospective users. The Samsung Galaxy A50 does it all while offering a really good user experience.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Leistung: 82% Bildschirm: 78% Mobilität: 69%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
Between the versatile cameras, bloat-free software and rather good gaming performance, the phone will more than suffice for most prospective users. The Samsung Galaxy A50 does it all while offering a really good user experience.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Leistung: 82% Bildschirm: 78% Mobilität: 69%
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a solid midrange phone with good looks, a gorgeous OLED display, and solid battery life. If you're a die-hard Samsung fan in search of a good midrange handset, this is your best bet. If not, you should consider the Pixel 3a. It checks off all the same boxes as the A50, along with a superior fingerprint sensor, faster performance, better camera quality, and guaranteed software updates, making it our Editors' Choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a handsome design and decent midrange specs, but it's not quite enough to compete with the Google Pixel 3a.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a solid midrange phone with good looks, a gorgeous OLED display, and solid battery life. If you're a die-hard Samsung fan in search of a good midrange handset, this is your best bet. If not, you should consider the Pixel 3a. It checks off all the same boxes as the A50, along with a superior fingerprint sensor, faster performance, better camera quality, and guaranteed software updates, making it our Editors' Choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a handsome design and decent midrange specs, but it's not quite enough to compete with the Google Pixel 3a.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 is very good, and it's refreshing to see Samsung take the midrange market seriously — particularly in the U.S., where it has remained laser-focused on its Galaxy S and Note products. With phone prices rising and ownership time increasing, the world needs more accessible handsets. It needs more phones like the A50.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 is very good, and it's refreshing to see Samsung take the midrange market seriously — particularly in the U.S., where it has remained laser-focused on its Galaxy S and Note products. With phone prices rising and ownership time increasing, the world needs more accessible handsets. It needs more phones like the A50.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
There really is a lot to like about the Galaxy A50, which can be though of as a sort of faux flagship Samsung smartphone. It's like an S10 but at a much more affordable price. We like the attractive design which is waterproof and lightweight. You then get some amazing hardware and features for your money inlcuding a really nice screen, decent cameras and 128GB of storage. It's not all plain sailing though, as the fingerprint scanner isn't very reliable and performance can be sluggish at times. So there are better mid-range phones around this price or a little bit more if you heart isn't set on Samsung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
There really is a lot to like about the Galaxy A50, which can be though of as a sort of faux flagship Samsung smartphone. It's like an S10 but at a much more affordable price. We like the attractive design which is waterproof and lightweight. You then get some amazing hardware and features for your money inlcuding a really nice screen, decent cameras and 128GB of storage. It's not all plain sailing though, as the fingerprint scanner isn't very reliable and performance can be sluggish at times. So there are better mid-range phones around this price or a little bit more if you heart isn't set on Samsung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE Archive.org version
Buy it. While the Galaxy A50's camera won't dazzle you like the Pixel 3a's, the Galaxy A50 is still an excellent value with a class-leading display. We just wish it was available from more carriers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.09.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE Archive.org version
Buy it. While the Galaxy A50's camera won't dazzle you like the Pixel 3a's, the Galaxy A50 is still an excellent value with a class-leading display. We just wish it was available from more carriers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.09.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: PC World EN→DE Archive.org version
The A50 is the perfect representation of that. At $350, there’s a lot to recommend. It has a nice design, a very solid screen, and a solid camera. One rub is that it’s not available on AT&T or T-Mobile yet (and Samsung hasn’t announced whether it will be), but it’s hardly the only budget phone to be locked out of certain carriers. It brings enough to the table where non-subscribers might even consider switching.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.08.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Greenbot EN→DE Archive.org version
The A50 is the perfect representation of that. At $350, there’s a lot to recommend. It has a nice design, a very solid screen, and a solid camera. One rub is that it’s not available on AT&T or T-Mobile yet (and Samsung hasn’t announced whether it will be), but it’s hardly the only budget phone to be locked out of certain carriers. It brings enough to the table where non-subscribers might even consider switching.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.08.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Good Gear Guide EN→DE Archive.org version
The A50 is the perfect representation of that. At $350, there’s a lot to recommend. It has a nice design, a very solid screen, and a solid camera. One rub is that it’s not available on AT&T or T-Mobile yet (and Samsung hasn’t announced whether it will be), but it’s hardly the only budget phone to be locked out of certain carriers. It brings enough to the table where non-subscribers might even consider switching.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.08.2019
Quelle: PC World EN→DE Archive.org version
The A50 is the perfect representation of that. At $350, there’s a lot to recommend. It has a nice design, a very solid screen, and a solid camera. One rub is that it’s not available on AT&T or T-Mobile yet (and Samsung hasn’t announced whether it will be), but it’s hardly the only budget phone to be locked out of certain carriers. It brings enough to the table where non-subscribers might even consider switching.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.08.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Greenbot EN→DE Archive.org version
The A50 is the perfect representation of that. At $350, there’s a lot to recommend. It has a nice design, a very solid screen, and a solid camera. One rub is that it’s not available on AT&T or T-Mobile yet (and Samsung hasn’t announced whether it will be), but it’s hardly the only budget phone to be locked out of certain carriers. It brings enough to the table where non-subscribers might even consider switching.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.08.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Good Gear Guide EN→DE Archive.org version
The A50 is the perfect representation of that. At $350, there’s a lot to recommend. It has a nice design, a very solid screen, and a solid camera. One rub is that it’s not available on AT&T or T-Mobile yet (and Samsung hasn’t announced whether it will be), but it’s hardly the only budget phone to be locked out of certain carriers. It brings enough to the table where non-subscribers might even consider switching.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.08.2019
Quelle: Know Your Mobile EN→DE Archive.org version
Given that there’s such a small difference in price between the Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A70, it’s hard to choose between them. However, we think the latter is perhaps the best option but if you’re really shopping on a tight budget then the A50 isn’t likely to disappoint.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.08.2019
Quelle: Know Your Mobile EN→DE Archive.org version
Given that there’s such a small difference in price between the Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A70, it’s hard to choose between them. However, we think the latter is perhaps the best option but if you’re really shopping on a tight budget then the A50 isn’t likely to disappoint.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.08.2019
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE Archive.org version
Packing a large 6.4-inch AMOLED display, the Exynos 9610 chipset, and a triple-camera setup, the Samsung Galaxy A50 has plenty for the budget-conscious smartphone enthusiast to get excited about. Under the rigors of our rear-camera testing, however, the A50 can’t match the performance of some of the best mid-range devices and certainly not the image quality of the latest flagship offerings. It’s best in bright sunny conditions, where exposure, dynamic range, and color are good, and bokeh shots are very acceptable. In cloudy or low-light conditions, though, it’s not quite as effective with stills or video, and we found zoom shots to be a particular weakness.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.07.2019
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE Archive.org version
Packing a large 6.4-inch AMOLED display, the Exynos 9610 chipset, and a triple-camera setup, the Samsung Galaxy A50 has plenty for the budget-conscious smartphone enthusiast to get excited about. Under the rigors of our rear-camera testing, however, the A50 can’t match the performance of some of the best mid-range devices and certainly not the image quality of the latest flagship offerings. It’s best in bright sunny conditions, where exposure, dynamic range, and color are good, and bokeh shots are very acceptable. In cloudy or low-light conditions, though, it’s not quite as effective with stills or video, and we found zoom shots to be a particular weakness.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.07.2019
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 is very good, and it's refreshing to see Samsung take the midrange market seriously — particularly in the U.S., where it has remained laser-focused on its Galaxy S and Note products. With phone prices rising and ownership time increasing, the world needs more accessible handsets. It needs more phones like the A50.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.06.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 is very good, and it's refreshing to see Samsung take the midrange market seriously — particularly in the U.S., where it has remained laser-focused on its Galaxy S and Note products. With phone prices rising and ownership time increasing, the world needs more accessible handsets. It needs more phones like the A50.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.06.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 has a significantly better Super AMOLED display and a nicer design. Performance-wise too, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is more than capable of holding its own with popular games like PUBG. This is one of the best mid-rangers Samsung has produced in years and I would have no qualms recommending it to all but the most demanding users.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.06.2019
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 has a significantly better Super AMOLED display and a nicer design. Performance-wise too, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is more than capable of holding its own with popular games like PUBG. This is one of the best mid-rangers Samsung has produced in years and I would have no qualms recommending it to all but the most demanding users.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.06.2019
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE Archive.org version
Looking at the past models of Samsung's mid-range mobile phones, I found them to have a slightly lower price to performance ratio. This has changed with the new Samsung Galaxy A50. Never have we seen an in-display fingerprint sensor, triple rear cameras with an ultra-wide sensor, a 4000mAh battery capacity, an AMOLED screen, 6GB RAM + 128GB ROM, all for the price of RM1199!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.05.2019
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE Archive.org version
Looking at the past models of Samsung's mid-range mobile phones, I found them to have a slightly lower price to performance ratio. This has changed with the new Samsung Galaxy A50. Never have we seen an in-display fingerprint sensor, triple rear cameras with an ultra-wide sensor, a 4000mAh battery capacity, an AMOLED screen, 6GB RAM + 128GB ROM, all for the price of RM1199!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.05.2019
Quelle: Fone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
In the ever changing Indian smartphone market, the South Korean tech giant Samsung learnt its lesson, recouped itself, and here they are with some amazing smartphones (Galaxy M series, Galaxy A series) posing a direct threat to the likes of Xiaomi, Realme, Vivo, HONOR and OPPO. Samsung overhauled its smartphone strategy at the mid-range price point in order to appeal more to millennials by bringing in cutting-edge features. As promised the company launched Galaxy A50 with an in-display fingerprint scanner, triple rear cameras and a huge battery. We’ve used the Galaxy A50 for sometime and come up with a reason on why you should and should not buy it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.05.2019
Quelle: Fone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
In the ever changing Indian smartphone market, the South Korean tech giant Samsung learnt its lesson, recouped itself, and here they are with some amazing smartphones (Galaxy M series, Galaxy A series) posing a direct threat to the likes of Xiaomi, Realme, Vivo, HONOR and OPPO. Samsung overhauled its smartphone strategy at the mid-range price point in order to appeal more to millennials by bringing in cutting-edge features. As promised the company launched Galaxy A50 with an in-display fingerprint scanner, triple rear cameras and a huge battery. We’ve used the Galaxy A50 for sometime and come up with a reason on why you should and should not buy it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.05.2019
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 looks like it has a decent amount of potential to compete in the tough mid-range market and hits a very attractive price point. It’s got some unexpected features like triple rear cameras and a fingerprint scanner embedded in the screen. There are also some excellent core specs here. There’s lots of things that need testing in the real world, though, so stay tuned.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.05.2019
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 looks like it has a decent amount of potential to compete in the tough mid-range market and hits a very attractive price point. It’s got some unexpected features like triple rear cameras and a fingerprint scanner embedded in the screen. There are also some excellent core specs here. There’s lots of things that need testing in the real world, though, so stay tuned.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.05.2019
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE Archive.org version
So where does that leave the Galaxy A50? Well, as we said at the very beginning, considering that it starts at Rs 19,990 for the 4 GB/ 64 GB option (the 6 GB/64 GB one will set you back by Rs 22,990), its major rival is expected to the Poco F1, and while that phone might have boasting rights when it comes to processors (thanks to its Qualcomm Snapdragon 845), the A50 more than matches it in other regards. The display and design are very good, and while the camera is prone to the sin of inconsistency, and the battery might not last as long as some would expect from its numbers, what cannot be denied is that the Galaxy A50 is perhaps one of Samsung’s best efforts in the budget flagship segment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE Archive.org version
So where does that leave the Galaxy A50? Well, as we said at the very beginning, considering that it starts at Rs 19,990 for the 4 GB/ 64 GB option (the 6 GB/64 GB one will set you back by Rs 22,990), its major rival is expected to the Poco F1, and while that phone might have boasting rights when it comes to processors (thanks to its Qualcomm Snapdragon 845), the A50 more than matches it in other regards. The display and design are very good, and while the camera is prone to the sin of inconsistency, and the battery might not last as long as some would expect from its numbers, what cannot be denied is that the Galaxy A50 is perhaps one of Samsung’s best efforts in the budget flagship segment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
It’s been a long time coming but we definitely think that Samsung hit the nail on the head with this mid-range offering. It might be hard to figure out which of their devices to purchase given the tremendous amount of products they’ve been dishing out in the past few weeks but if your budget can handle the Php 17,990 asking price and want to or have been wanting to try out then put this phone on your radar.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.04.2019
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
It’s been a long time coming but we definitely think that Samsung hit the nail on the head with this mid-range offering. It might be hard to figure out which of their devices to purchase given the tremendous amount of products they’ve been dishing out in the past few weeks but if your budget can handle the Php 17,990 asking price and want to or have been wanting to try out then put this phone on your radar.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.04.2019
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE Archive.org version
With its premium design, Samsung Galaxy A50 was able to impress its take on the design and build. Lightweight in hand, this device feels like a flagship phone. Camera performance is just average despite having a larger sensor and triple-rear camera set up. On the other hand, over-all performance in gaming and multi-tasking is a bit above what we expected. Plus, the use of Super AMOLED and USB Type-C technologies have made Samsung Galaxy A50 stand out.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 80% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 and the Galaxy A30 actually differ a great deal in terms of price. In the United States, you can find both these phones unlocked over at B&H, and the Galaxy A50 costs $300, while the A50 rocks a price of $230. In Europe and the rest of the world, the price delta between the two is bigger: the A50 costs 350 euro in Europe, while the A30 sells for just around 200 euro.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE Archive.org version
With its premium design, Samsung Galaxy A50 was able to impress its take on the design and build. Lightweight in hand, this device feels like a flagship phone. Camera performance is just average despite having a larger sensor and triple-rear camera set up. On the other hand, over-all performance in gaming and multi-tasking is a bit above what we expected. Plus, the use of Super AMOLED and USB Type-C technologies have made Samsung Galaxy A50 stand out.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 80% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50 and the Galaxy A30 actually differ a great deal in terms of price. In the United States, you can find both these phones unlocked over at B&H, and the Galaxy A50 costs $300, while the A50 rocks a price of $230. In Europe and the rest of the world, the price delta between the two is bigger: the A50 costs 350 euro in Europe, while the A30 sells for just around 200 euro.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung got a lot of things right in the Galaxy A50 - the design and color options, the screen, the performance, and the battery life. The still images, while not impressive in detail, are of high-resolution and dependable to get the scene right no matter the available light and weather conditions. The 1080p videos are impressive, too.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung got a lot of things right in the Galaxy A50 - the design and color options, the screen, the performance, and the battery life. The still images, while not impressive in detail, are of high-resolution and dependable to get the scene right no matter the available light and weather conditions. The 1080p videos are impressive, too.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74%
Quelle: Phone World EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a complete package with many premium features such as AMOLED display, 4GB RAM and 4000 mAh big battery. It is a perfect device for mid-range users plus its size is also very satisfactory for the game and social media lovers. If you are looking for a good midrange device of Samsung then Samsung Galaxy A50 is a perfect choice for you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.04.2019
Quelle: Phone World EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a complete package with many premium features such as AMOLED display, 4GB RAM and 4000 mAh big battery. It is a perfect device for mid-range users plus its size is also very satisfactory for the game and social media lovers. If you are looking for a good midrange device of Samsung then Samsung Galaxy A50 is a perfect choice for you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.04.2019
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a big and bold device, which was very quick to navigate and use, but we're yet to be convinced by its camera capabilities.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.04.2019
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a big and bold device, which was very quick to navigate and use, but we're yet to be convinced by its camera capabilities.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.04.2019
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE Archive.org version
Given the price point, the Samsung Galaxy A50 offers good features and decent value for money. The camera is fairly good, however, the in-display fingerprint reader is a tad slow, however, this may get resolved in the coming updates. At this price point, the Samsung Galaxy A50 looks like a good buy at the moment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE Archive.org version
Given the price point, the Samsung Galaxy A50 offers good features and decent value for money. The camera is fairly good, however, the in-display fingerprint reader is a tad slow, however, this may get resolved in the coming updates. At this price point, the Samsung Galaxy A50 looks like a good buy at the moment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
Yes, it looks pretty good and yes, the performance is more than sufficient for the price, but what really stood out for me was the clean and optimized user experience. This phone does not get in the way or bother you with extended permissions, and it definitely does not pop up advertisements. For me, and I would imagine a significant number of users, this is a pretty big incentive.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 20.03.2019
Quelle: Tech2 EN→DE Archive.org version
For those who are in for design, a great AMOLED display, and a decent camera, the Galaxy A50 is your device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.03.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A50 can be considered as one of the best-designed smartphones from Samsung. The Prism-style gradient finish gives a pretty cool look, while the display is another plus point. The new user interface comes with its share of hits and misses and the camera performance is a mixed bag one. Overall, if you are a Samsung loyalist then this phone might excite, else you can consider Xiaomi Poco F1, Nokia 8.1 and Vivo V11 Pro which comes loaded with some great performance coupled with capable cameras and new technologies.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.03.2019
Quelle: Tech2 EN→DE Archive.org version
For those who are in for design, a great AMOLED display, and a decent camera, the Galaxy A50 is your device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.03.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
Yes, it looks pretty good and yes, the performance is more than sufficient for the price, but what really stood out for me was the clean and optimized user experience. This phone does not get in the way or bother you with extended permissions, and it definitely does not pop up advertisements. For me, and I would imagine a significant number of users, this is a pretty big incentive.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 20.03.2019
Quelle: Tech2 EN→DE Archive.org version
For those who are in for design, a great AMOLED display, and a decent camera, the Galaxy A50 is your device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.03.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A50 can be considered as one of the best-designed smartphones from Samsung. The Prism-style gradient finish gives a pretty cool look, while the display is another plus point. The new user interface comes with its share of hits and misses and the camera performance is a mixed bag one. Overall, if you are a Samsung loyalist then this phone might excite, else you can consider Xiaomi Poco F1, Nokia 8.1 and Vivo V11 Pro which comes loaded with some great performance coupled with capable cameras and new technologies.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.03.2019
Quelle: Tech2 EN→DE Archive.org version
For those who are in for design, a great AMOLED display, and a decent camera, the Galaxy A50 is your device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.03.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE Archive.org version
Priced at Rs 19,990 (4GB/64GB), the Samsung Galaxy A50 seems to be an identical twin of the Galaxy M30; albeit, with a gradient reflective design, sleek operating system, an in-display fingerprint sensor and a slightly powerful processor. At its price, the phone competes with the likes of Xiaomi Poco F1 and Honor Play.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2019
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
Both phones also come with a generously sized 4,000mAh battery paired up with 15W fast charging and a bundled fast charger as well. In Malaysia, the Galaxy A30 comes in your choice of black, white or blue for RM799 while the Galaxy A50 comes in your choice of black, white and blue for RM1199. Both phones are now available at all authorised retailers nationwide and all Samsung Experiencr stores and the Samsung Online Store.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2019
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE Archive.org version
Priced at Rs 19,990 (4GB/64GB), the Samsung Galaxy A50 seems to be an identical twin of the Galaxy M30; albeit, with a gradient reflective design, sleek operating system, an in-display fingerprint sensor and a slightly powerful processor. At its price, the phone competes with the likes of Xiaomi Poco F1 and Honor Play.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2019
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
Both phones also come with a generously sized 4,000mAh battery paired up with 15W fast charging and a bundled fast charger as well. In Malaysia, the Galaxy A30 comes in your choice of black, white or blue for RM799 while the Galaxy A50 comes in your choice of black, white and blue for RM1199. Both phones are now available at all authorised retailers nationwide and all Samsung Experiencr stores and the Samsung Online Store.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2019
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50, like the Galaxy M20, isn’t great in any one aspect other than that Super AMOLED display, but the overall package is a good one for the asking price (₹19,990, or $292) for a Samsung smartphone. Samsung continues to be the only manufacturer giving you ultra-wide rear cameras in the budget and mid-range, and the Galaxy A50 has excellent battery life and comes with Android Pie and Samsung’s latest One UI interface and features.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2019
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50, like the Galaxy M20, isn’t great in any one aspect other than that Super AMOLED display, but the overall package is a good one for the asking price (₹19,990, or $292) for a Samsung smartphone. Samsung continues to be the only manufacturer giving you ultra-wide rear cameras in the budget and mid-range, and the Galaxy A50 has excellent battery life and comes with Android Pie and Samsung’s latest One UI interface and features.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2019
Quelle: Mobygyaan EN→DE Archive.org version
Moving to the verdict, this is yet Samsung’s best smartphone in this segment that offers value. It has an on-screen fingerprint scanner, gorgeous AMOLED display, and an impressive design that makes it a worthy challenger. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a recommended buy if you are looking for a midrange phone with an all-rounder package.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.03.2019
Quelle: Mobygyaan EN→DE Archive.org version
Moving to the verdict, this is yet Samsung’s best smartphone in this segment that offers value. It has an on-screen fingerprint scanner, gorgeous AMOLED display, and an impressive design that makes it a worthy challenger. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a recommended buy if you are looking for a midrange phone with an all-rounder package.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.03.2019
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
Unfortunately for Samsung, the Galaxy A50 with its starting price of Rs. 19,990 competes with Xiaomi's Poco F1 (Review) which features the top-end Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor. That's obviously the better choice of phone if you're a gamer or want the smoothest possible experience, but it doesn't have three rear cameras or a modern all-screen design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.03.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
Unfortunately for Samsung, the Galaxy A50 with its starting price of Rs. 19,990 competes with Xiaomi's Poco F1 (Review) which features the top-end Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor. That's obviously the better choice of phone if you're a gamer or want the smoothest possible experience, but it doesn't have three rear cameras or a modern all-screen design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.03.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
We'll be running our usual battery of tests and using both phones out in the real world, and we'll soon bring you our detailed reviews of both phone's performance, display quality, camera quality, battery life, software, usability, and durability, so stay tuned to Gadgets 360.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.03.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
We'll be running our usual battery of tests and using both phones out in the real world, and we'll soon bring you our detailed reviews of both phone's performance, display quality, camera quality, battery life, software, usability, and durability, so stay tuned to Gadgets 360.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.03.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A50 comes with a beautiful design language and the display looks immersive. The camera seems to be promising, while the performance and battery are to be tested out. As for the competition is concerned, the smartphone will face stiff competition from the Vivo V11 Pro, Nokia 8.1, Honor Play and Xiaomi Poco F1.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.02.2019
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A50 comes with a beautiful design language and the display looks immersive. The camera seems to be promising, while the performance and battery are to be tested out. As for the competition is concerned, the smartphone will face stiff competition from the Vivo V11 Pro, Nokia 8.1, Honor Play and Xiaomi Poco F1.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.02.2019
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
There's lots of things that need testing out in the real world but the Galaxy A50 has the potential to be a great mid-range smartphone. It's got Galaxy S10-esque features like a triple rear camera and embedded fingerprint scanner but without the high price tag.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.02.2019
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
There’s no pricing set as of yet for both phones, but it’s clear that Samsung is positioning them at the mid-range segment of the market. We’re hoping Samsung has learned that pricing matters in the hyper-competitive mid-range segment, and prices both phones accordingly if and when they’re released in the Philippines.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.02.2019
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
There's lots of things that need testing out in the real world but the Galaxy A50 has the potential to be a great mid-range smartphone. It's got Galaxy S10-esque features like a triple rear camera and embedded fingerprint scanner but without the high price tag.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.02.2019
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
There’s no pricing set as of yet for both phones, but it’s clear that Samsung is positioning them at the mid-range segment of the market. We’re hoping Samsung has learned that pricing matters in the hyper-competitive mid-range segment, and prices both phones accordingly if and when they’re released in the Philippines.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.02.2019
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a big and bold device, which was very quick to navigate and use, but we're yet to be convinced by its camera capabilities.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.02.2019
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
We would love to test this performance in more depth, though. So, hopefully, the Tab S5e stops by the office at some point. We're also kind interested to see how Samsung's new phone sync feature works. As per press materials, it should allow you to pick up a phone call on your tablet, without having your phone around just as you can with an iPad/iPhone combo.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.02.2019
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a big and bold device, which was very quick to navigate and use, but we're yet to be convinced by its camera capabilities.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.02.2019
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
We would love to test this performance in more depth, though. So, hopefully, the Tab S5e stops by the office at some point. We're also kind interested to see how Samsung's new phone sync feature works. As per press materials, it should allow you to pick up a phone call on your tablet, without having your phone around just as you can with an iPad/iPhone combo.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.02.2019
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE Archive.org version
In the brief time that we have spent with the devices at MWC 2019, the Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A30 appear to be worthy successors to the Galaxy A handsets of 2018. The new naming convention aside, they offer a nice mix of features at what will undoubtedly be a relatively affordable price. The Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A30 will go on sale in mid-March with India most likely being the first country to get them. The sheer amount of localized content on the devices on display here suggest that much.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.02.2019
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE Archive.org version
In the brief time that we have spent with the devices at MWC 2019, the Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A30 appear to be worthy successors to the Galaxy A handsets of 2018. The new naming convention aside, they offer a nice mix of features at what will undoubtedly be a relatively affordable price. The Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A30 will go on sale in mid-March with India most likely being the first country to get them. The sheer amount of localized content on the devices on display here suggest that much.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.02.2019
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.05.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.05.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Hipertextual ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Hipertextual ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Incognitosis ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.03.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Incognitosis ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.03.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Zona Movilidad ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Infinity display; nice triple cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; powerful hardware; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.09.2019
Quelle: Zona Movilidad ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Infinity display; nice triple cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; powerful hardware; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.09.2019
Quelle: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; nice performance; great cameras; decent hardware; long battery life. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor; unsupported waterproof; no wireless charging; mediocre speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 16.08.2019
Quelle: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; nice performance; great cameras; decent hardware; long battery life. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor; unsupported waterproof; no wireless charging; mediocre speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 16.08.2019
Quelle: El Androide Libre ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; high performance; great cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 07.04.2019
Quelle: El Androide Libre ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; high performance; great cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 07.04.2019
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice speakers; decent triple cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.03.2019
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice speakers; decent triple cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.03.2019
Quelle: Everyeye.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.07.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Everyeye.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.07.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: AndroidPit.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: AndroidPit.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 75% Ergonomie: 75%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 75% Ergonomie: 75%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Preis: 80% Ausstattung: 85% Bildschirm: 89% Mobilität: 92% Ergonomie: 73%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Preis: 80% Ausstattung: 85% Bildschirm: 89% Mobilität: 92% Ergonomie: 73%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2019
Bewertung: Preis: 78% Ausstattung: 86%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2019
Bewertung: Preis: 78% Ausstattung: 86%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 02.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 72%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 02.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 72%
Quelle: AndroidPit.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; impressive fingerprint sensor.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.02.2019
Quelle: AndroidPit.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; impressive fingerprint sensor.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.02.2019
Quelle: Tablets Magazine NL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Tablets Magazine NL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl NL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; beautiful display; good price; nice cameras. Negative: Unstable device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.11.2019
Quelle: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl NL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; beautiful display; good price; nice cameras. Negative: Unstable device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.11.2019
Quelle: Portablegear NL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; decent hardware; big screen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.04.2019
Quelle: Portablegear NL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; decent hardware; big screen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.04.2019
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.06.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.06.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Fredzone FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.06.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: Fredzone FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.06.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.05.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.05.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: 01Net FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 70% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: 01Net FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 70% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: AndroidPit.fr FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: AndroidPit.fr FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Fredzone FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive device; beautiful design; solid workmanship.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.05.2019
Quelle: Fredzone FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive device; beautiful design; solid workmanship.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.05.2019
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; beautiful design; solid workmanship; big screen; excellent display; high performance; support NFC chip; nice cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.04.2019
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; beautiful design; solid workmanship; big screen; excellent display; high performance; support NFC chip; nice cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.04.2019
Quelle: Erenumerique FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent hardware; nice performance; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 22.03.2019
Quelle: Erenumerique FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent hardware; nice performance; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 22.03.2019
Quelle: AndroidPit.fr FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive triple cameras; flexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.02.2019
Quelle: AndroidPit.fr FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive triple cameras; flexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.02.2019
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; excellent display; nice triple cameras; impressive fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.02.2019
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; excellent display; nice triple cameras; impressive fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.02.2019
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.05.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.05.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 71% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 71% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Antyweb PL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Great super AMOLED screen; long battery life; nice cameras; support NFC. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.04.2019
Quelle: Antyweb PL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Great super AMOLED screen; long battery life; nice cameras; support NFC. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.04.2019
Quelle: Tekno Seyir TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tekno Seyir TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Chip Online TR TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Chip Online TR TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail RU→DE Archive.org version
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 50% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail RU→DE Archive.org version
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 50% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Mega Obzor RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; nice display; high performance; long battery life; impressive triple cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.03.2019
Quelle: Mega Obzor RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; nice display; high performance; long battery life; impressive triple cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.03.2019
Quelle: Geeks.hu HU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Great display; long battery life; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: No zoom camera; thick frames.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.07.2019
Quelle: Geeks.hu HU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Great display; long battery life; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: No zoom camera; thick frames.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.07.2019
Quelle: CZC CZ→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; solid workmanship; nice and frameless display; great cameras; comfortable ergonomy; long battery life; fast charging. Negative: Unsupported waterproof.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.04.2019
Quelle: CZC CZ→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; solid workmanship; nice and frameless display; great cameras; comfortable ergonomy; long battery life; fast charging. Negative: Unsupported waterproof.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.04.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; beautiful design; high performance; long battery life; quick charging; nice design; excellent cameras.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.09.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; beautiful design; high performance; long battery life; quick charging; nice design; excellent cameras.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.09.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; colorful design; infinity display; big screen; nice triple cameras; powerful hardware; large battery capacity; fast charging; flexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.09.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; colorful design; infinity display; big screen; nice triple cameras; powerful hardware; large battery capacity; fast charging; flexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.09.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; high performance; good price; excellent display; impressive fingerprint sensor; large battery capacity; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.09.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; high performance; good price; excellent display; impressive fingerprint sensor; large battery capacity; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.09.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price / performance ratio; nice design; impressive fingerprint sensor; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.07.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price / performance ratio; nice design; impressive fingerprint sensor; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.07.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; impressive performance; nice display; great cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.07.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; impressive performance; nice display; great cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.07.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; excellent display; powerful processor; great triple cameras; fast charging; flexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.07.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; excellent display; powerful processor; great triple cameras; fast charging; flexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.07.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; nice triple cameras; impressive fingerprint sensor; high performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.05.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; nice triple cameras; impressive fingerprint sensor; high performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.05.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; good hardware; high performance; large battery capacity.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.04.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; good hardware; high performance; large battery capacity.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.04.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; beautiful design; super AMOLED display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.04.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; beautiful design; super AMOLED display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.04.2019
Quelle: XT Mobile VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; attractive price; nice cameras. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.04.2019
Quelle: XT Mobile VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; attractive price; nice cameras. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.04.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; great built quality; high performance; long battery life; nice cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.04.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; great built quality; high performance; long battery life; nice cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.04.2019
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice triple cameras; large battery capacity; fast charging; excellent display; high gaming performance. Negative: Plastic case; inflexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.04.2019
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice triple cameras; large battery capacity; fast charging; excellent display; high gaming performance. Negative: Plastic case; inflexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.04.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice triple cameras; high performance; impressive design; good hardware; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.03.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice triple cameras; high performance; impressive design; good hardware; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.03.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; impressive fingerprint sensor; nice display; high performance; excellent cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.03.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; impressive fingerprint sensor; nice display; high performance; excellent cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Decent hardware; big screen; nice display; large battery capacity; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Decent hardware; big screen; nice display; large battery capacity; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.03.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; beautiful design; impressive performance; excellent display; fast fingerprint sensor; nice cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2019
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; beautiful design; impressive performance; excellent display; fast fingerprint sensor; nice cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2019
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; impressive fingerprint sensor; excellent triple cameras; long battery life; beautiful design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; impressive fingerprint sensor; excellent triple cameras; long battery life; beautiful design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.03.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive triple cameras; flexible fingerprint sensor; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.03.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive triple cameras; flexible fingerprint sensor; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Decent hardware; attractive design; long battery life; nice triple cameras; impressive fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.03.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; premium design; excellent display; decent hardware; impressive fingerprint sensor; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Decent hardware; attractive design; long battery life; nice triple cameras; impressive fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.03.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; premium design; excellent display; decent hardware; impressive fingerprint sensor; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; decent performance; impressive battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive fingerprint sensor; excellent triple cameras; premium design; nice display; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; flexible fingerprint sensor; nice display; great performance; excellent triple cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; decent performance; impressive battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive fingerprint sensor; excellent triple cameras; premium design; nice display; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; flexible fingerprint sensor; nice display; great performance; excellent triple cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.03.2019
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive fingerprint sensor; beautiful design; long battery life; quick charging; powerful processor; high performance; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.03.2019
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive fingerprint sensor; beautiful design; long battery life; quick charging; powerful processor; high performance; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.03.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras; big screen; impressive fingerprint sensor; premium design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.03.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras; big screen; impressive fingerprint sensor; premium design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.03.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; powerful hardware; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.03.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; powerful hardware; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; beautiful design; flexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; beautiful design; flexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive fingerprint sensor; modern design; excellent triple cameras; powerful hardware; long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.03.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive fingerprint sensor; modern design; excellent triple cameras; powerful hardware; long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.03.2019
Quelle: TechZ VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; solid workmanship; powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.03.2019
Quelle: TechZ VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; solid workmanship; powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.03.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; flexible fingerprint sensor; excellent display; nice triple cameras; high performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.03.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; flexible fingerprint sensor; excellent display; nice triple cameras; high performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.03.2019
Quelle: Tek.no NO→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Tek.no NO→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Mobil DK DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.06.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Mobil DK DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.06.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74%
Quelle: M3 PC för alla SV→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: M3 PC för alla SV→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.04.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Arena IT →DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.06.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Arena IT →DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.06.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; modern design; great built quality; nice cameras; large battery capacity; powerful processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.07.2019
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; modern design; great built quality; nice cameras; large battery capacity; powerful processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.07.2019
Samsung Galaxy A50s
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A50sProzessor: Samsung Exynos Exynos 9610
Grafikkarte: ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Bildschirm: 6.40 Zoll, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.169kg
Preis: 350 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE Archive.org version
In conclusion, if you are keen on owning a smartphone with a camera that is comparable to a flagship smartphone, you might want to consider the Samsung Galaxy A50s. This is due to the fact that it only costs RM1299 and it comes with various features typically found on higher-end devices.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.01.2020
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is not a bad phone. The camera is pleasing, the battery life is good enough, and this is an excellent AMOLED display. The performance is good enough for regular usage, but it does struggle if you are those who do a lot of heavy gaming. For the Galaxy A50s, competition like Redmi K20, Nokia 7.2 will make it harder to stand out.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: NLT EN→DE Archive.org version
Overall, for RM1,299, the Galaxy A50s has a higher price tag compared to other mid-range smartphones in the market, but it offers a better software experience and ecosystem compared to other brands.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Preis: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Think Digit EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50s isn’t the best performer in the upper mid-range segment, but if you are looking for a phone that looks good and handy to use, the A50s is a good option to consider. It also comes with a reliable camera system. The primary 48MP camera is optimised to shoot well-detailed, vibrant images in the day, but not much useful once the sun sets. OneUI based on Android 9 also goes a long way in making the Galaxy A50s highly usable with a lot of features borrowed from the flagship S-series, but keep in mind that if gaming is what you are after in a phone, this is not the best option.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Preis: 94% Leistung: 66% Gehäuse: 62%
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE Archive.org version
The A50s slips very neatly into the Rs 20,000-25,000 price segment where there is actually very limited competition (the Redmi K20 is the only significant new device there). Given its performance and pricing, and, of course, its considerable brand equity, Samsung could have another bestseller on its hands here.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: The Techy EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A50s is a fairly good effort by smartphone manufacturer in a segment that is highly competitive. The performance is flawless including gaming. However, we weren’t impressed with the slow fingerprint sensor. Those who love shooting pictures, they are likely to find the device valuable.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Leistung: 85% Gehäuse: 75% Ergonomie: 75%
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
As it stands, the Galaxy A50s is an incremental upgrade of the original A50 with improved front and rear cameras and modest firmware updates that offer more flagship type features. It’s a solid all-rounder, with a good Super AMOLED display, decent overall performance and an otherwise good set of cameras for day-to-day use though at this competitive price category it’s a bit on the pricey side. That extra premium however goes towards the polish and deep integration of the Galaxy A50’s myriad user interface and design including Samsung Pay that other brands have yet to match.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: India Today EN→DE Archive.org version
On its own, the Galaxy A50s is a pretty attractive phone, but largely similar to the Galaxy A50. It comes with a sleek and lightweight design and a stunning AMOLED display, much like its predecessor. The performance is good enough for day-to-day usage and it delivers a full day battery life as well. Cameras have been upgraded and are better compared to the Galaxy A50. That being said, I feel the upgrades are not drastic enough from the Galaxy A50.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE Archive.org version
For a small price bump, you’re also getting a small spec bump. While there’s nothing wrong with the Galaxy A50s, we feel like this could’ve been the Galaxy A50 in the first place. Now that Realme 5 Pro and Redmi Note 8 Pro are on the market and have way cheaper price tags, this makes the A50s hard to recommend. Samsung is now back to square one when it comes to its mid-range smartphones.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.10.2019
Quelle: Mobygyaan EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a decent smartphone for the starting price of ₹22,999. It features good-looking design, packs a decent set of internals and offers a good battery life. However, the phone lacks behind in crucial departments for its asking price — camera and performance. The Galaxy A50s is a good effort from the South Korean giant but it still is not the answer against Chinese offerings. Compared to this, the Realme XT, Xiaomi Redmi K20, and the Vivo Z1x seem better, both in terms of specs and pricing. However, if you are interested in buying Galaxy A50s, you can purchase it through Flipkart.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.10.2019
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50s seems like a reasonable mid-range smartphone on paper. It has almost everything one could want, including a multi-camera setup on the back, a relatively high-resolution AMOLED display, decent storage options, and a sizable battery capacity. It even has a headphone jack.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.10.2019
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50s with 4,000mAh battery, 48MP main shooter, and the price tag of Rs 24,999 for 6GB + 128GB version (Rs 22, 999 for 4GB + 128GB) is a considerable offering in the mid-range segment but faces a tough competition from rivals. The smartphone looks impressive, and scores well on several parameters, especially performance. The camera may not impress too much, but does a fine job otherwise. Overall, we had a good experience with the phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.09.2019
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
As far as specifications and the overall usage experience go, there isn't much difference at all between the Galaxy A50s and its predecessor, the Galaxy A50 (Review). There's nothing groundbreaking here, and nothing that really stands out for a sub-Rs. 25,000 phone today. That said, everything works well enough, and both the hardware and software feel highly polished.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.09.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE Archive.org version
Overall, the A50s is solid mid-ranger with a bright display, modest battery life, the latest One UI, and better camera hardware. The chipset benchmarks gave us mixed results, and there were a couple of frame drops during gaming, but apart from that, we think it’s a decent upgrade from the A50. Samsung has the A50s priced at PHP 18,990, which is just a couple of thousand pesos more than its predecessor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.09.2019
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
Externally, the Galaxy A30s and Galaxy A50s look quite similar to each other with a design that’s almost a spitting image of each other including a nigh identically sized 6.4-inch display but they vary substantially in almost every detail with the Galaxy A50s packing better hardware. In general, both phones also notably come with under-display fingerprint readers, triple rear camera arrays, 15W fast charging, 4,000mAh sized batteries and Samsung Pay support.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.09.2019
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is probably one of the most 'hatke' designed smartphones from Samsung. Some might instantly feel attracted to its design and some might be confused with it. The display to the point, though the camera performance in low light seems to be an issue here. Overall, if you ask for the competition, it will go against the likes of Xiaomi Redmi K20, Vivo V15 Pro and more.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.09.2019
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
At a starting price of Rs. 22,999, the Galaxy A50s goes head-on with some well-received phones such as Redmi K20 (Review), Poco F1 (Review), and the Vivo V15 Pro (Review), to name a few. The overall package is a little underwhelming for the asking price, but we'll reserve the final verdict for our review as we extensively test the cameras, day-to-day performance, and battery life. Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 for our Galaxy A50s review arriving soon.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.09.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: The Guardian EN→DE Archive.org version
Nếu nhìn bề ngoài thì có vẻ như Galaxy A50s không khác biệt là mấy so với Galaxy A50 vẫn là chất liệu nhựa giả kính sang trọng. Mặt trước vẫn là màn hình Infinity-U trên tấm nền Super AMOLED 6.4 inch với độ phân giải 1.080×2.340 px.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.08.2019
Quelle: Mega Obzor RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice cameras; elegant design; excellent display; powerful processor; high auonomy; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice cameras; beautiful display; good price; decent performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.03.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice performance; great cameras; excellent display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.11.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; modern design; nice performance; long battery life; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.11.2019
Quelle: XT Mobile VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; slim size; light weight; bright display; nice performance; great cameras; decent autonomy; good price. Negative: Slow fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.11.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Large battery capacity; quick charging; stylish design; big screen; nice display; good hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.11.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; nice triple cameras; high performance; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.11.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive autonomy; infinity display; beautiful design; decent hardware; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.10.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; nice triple cameras; frameless design; great display; fast fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.10.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; nice triple cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.10.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; nice triple cameras; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.10.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; stylish design; frameless display; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.10.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; good display; great performance; excellent cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.10.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Great triple cameras; beautiful design; nice display; high performance; fast charging; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.10.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; stylish design; good display; decent performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.10.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; excellent AMOLED display; nice cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.09.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; great cameras; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.09.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; elegant design; nice cameras; fast charging; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.09.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; beautiful design; high performance; long battery life; quick charging; nice design; excellent cameras.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.09.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; great cameras; decent hardware; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.09.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; impressive cameras; high performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.09.2019
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice display; great triple cameras; powerful hardware; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.09.2019
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; fast fingerprint sensor; powerful hardware; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.09.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern cameras; stylish design; attractive price; slim size; nice cameras; decent autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.09.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Large screen; impressive cameras; elegant design; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.09.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; fast charging; nice triple cameras; infinity display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.09.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; solid workmanship; excellent display; big screen; nice triple cameras; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.09.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; nice cameras; decent hardware; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.09.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice triple cameras; stylish design; high performance; long battery life; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.09.2019
Samsung Galaxy A51
Es ist unbestreitbar, dass das Samsung Galaxy A50 eines der beliebtesten Smartphones im Jahr 2019 war und haufenweise verkauft wurde. Es zu ersetzen, ist somit eine sehr schwierige Aufgabe. Erfüllt das Samsung Galaxy A51, das nach seinem Vorgänger auf den Markt kam, alle Erwartungen? Nun, Samsung ging auf Nummer sicher, was sich als keine schlechte Idee herausstellte. Das Samsung Galaxy A51 hält definitiv seine Versprechen und ist seinen Preis wert. Das attraktive, Prisma-artige Design ist nicht der einzige Höhepunkt, denn das Kamera-Setup übertrifft das des Galaxy A50. Für Selfie-Liebhaber hat das A51 einen 32-MP-Sensor auf der Vorderseite, während das A50 nur eine 25-MP-Selfiekamera hatte. Des Weiteren ist das Samsung Galaxy A51 mit einem Infinity-O-Display ausgestattet, das zunächst in hochwertigeren Geräten, wie dem Galaxy Note 10 oder dem Galaxy Note 10+, gesehen wurde. Dies ist definitiv eine Überlegung wert, da es ein erstklassiges Erlebnis zu einem günstigen Preis bietet.
Die Bildschirmgröße des Galaxy A51 ist mit 6,5 Zoll etwas größer als beim Galaxy A50 (6,4 Zoll). Wie gesagt, der kleinste Unterschied kann beim Nutzererlebnis viel bewirken. Was die Software betrifft, so unterscheidet sich das Galaxy A51 von seinem Vorgänger, indem es mit Android 10 und One UI 2.0 läuft. Dies verbessert die allgemeine Leistung des Gerätes wesentlich. Videoaufnahmen des A51 sind doppelt so gut mit 2160 x 30fps verglichen mit 1080 x 30fps beim Galaxy A50. Für alle Videojunkies eignet sich das Samsung Galaxy A51 bestens. Obwohl das Gehäuse des A51 etwas mehr wiegt, macht sich das in der Hand nicht bemerkbar, das Gewicht ist somit unbedeutend. Das Samsung Galaxy A51 liefert außerdem höhere CPU-Geschwindigkeiten als das Galaxy A50. Im Bereich der äußerlichen Präsentation kann man zwischen mehreren Farben wählen, zum Beispiel Prism Crush White, Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Pink und, nicht zuletzt, Prism Crush Blue. Anders als beim Galaxy A50 haben Nutzer eine große Auswahl. Allerdings sollte man bedenken, dass das Samsung Galaxy A51 gewisse Ähnlichkeiten mit seinen Varianten hat, zum Beispiel beim Speicherplatz. Wie das Galaxy A50 bietet auch das A51 entweder 64 GB oder 128 GB Speicherplatz. Beide Modelle haben einen ähnlichen Fingerabdruck-Leser im Display eingebaut. Der 4.000-mAh-Akku, der 15-W-Schnellladen unterstützt, ist identisch mit dem des Galaxy A50. Doch obwohl das Samsung Galaxy A51 einiges von seinen Vorgängern übernommen hat, ist es dennoch ein einzigartiges Gerät.
Hands-on-Artikel von Jagadisa Rajarathnam
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A51Prozessor: Samsung Exynos Exynos 9611
Grafikkarte: ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Bildschirm: 6.50 Zoll, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.172kg
Preis: 369 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 ist der Nachfolger eines der erfolgreichsten Smartphones 2019. Da gibt es natürlich hohe Erwartungen und auch die Konkurrenz schläft nicht. Ob das Galaxy-Smartphone mit insgesamt fünf Kameras überzeugen kann, das erfahren Sie im Test.
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Mein Fazit: Ich persönlich glaube nicht, dass das Samsung Galaxy A51 im Jahr 2021 noch eine gute Wahl ist. Das Smartphone ist in einigen Aspekten immer noch konkurrenzfähig.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Mein Fazit: Ich persönlich glaube nicht, dass das Samsung Galaxy A51 im Jahr 2021 noch eine gute Wahl ist. Das Smartphone ist in einigen Aspekten immer noch konkurrenzfähig.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 hat alles, was man vom einem sehr ordentlichen Mittelklasse-Smartphone erwartet: ein beeindruckend kontrastreiches OLED-Display, ein modernes Design und eine vielseitige Kamera inklusive Ultraweitwinkel sowie Makrolinse. Das Arbeitstempo allerdings ist nicht hoch und die Knipse kommt vor allem bei wenig Licht nicht an Spitzen-Handys heran.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 hat alles, was man vom einem sehr ordentlichen Mittelklasse-Smartphone erwartet: ein beeindruckend kontrastreiches OLED-Display, ein modernes Design und eine vielseitige Kamera inklusive Ultraweitwinkel sowie Makrolinse. Das Arbeitstempo allerdings ist nicht hoch und die Knipse kommt vor allem bei wenig Licht nicht an Spitzen-Handys heran.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: WinFuture
Das Galaxy A51 ist ein weiterer Vertreter der preiswerteren Mittelklasse aus dem Hause Samsung Electronics. Das Smartphone ist mit einem AMOLED-Display ausgestattet, das man in dieser Preisklasse nicht zu oft findet. Darüber hinaus gibt es aber wenig, womit das Gerät glänzen würde.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.02.2021
Quelle: WinFuture
Das Galaxy A51 ist ein weiterer Vertreter der preiswerteren Mittelklasse aus dem Hause Samsung Electronics. Das Smartphone ist mit einem AMOLED-Display ausgestattet, das man in dieser Preisklasse nicht zu oft findet. Darüber hinaus gibt es aber wenig, womit das Gerät glänzen würde.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.02.2021
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 hat alles, was man vom einem sehr ordentlichen Mittelklasse-Smartphone erwartet: ein beeindruckend kontrastreiches OLED-Display, ein modernes Design und eine vielseitige Kamera inklusive Ultraweitwinkel sowie Makrolinse. Das Arbeitstempo allerdings ist nicht hoch und die Knipse kommt vor allem bei wenig Licht nicht an Spitzen-Handys heran.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.02.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 hat alles, was man vom einem sehr ordentlichen Mittelklasse-Smartphone erwartet: ein beeindruckend kontrastreiches OLED-Display, ein modernes Design und eine vielseitige Kamera inklusive Ultraweitwinkel sowie Makrolinse. Das Arbeitstempo allerdings ist nicht hoch und die Knipse kommt vor allem bei wenig Licht nicht an Spitzen-Handys heran.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.02.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Computerbild Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 hat alles, was man vom einem sehr ordentlichen Mittelklasse-Smartphone erwartet: ein beeindruckend kontrastreiches OLED-Display, ein modernes Design und eine vielseitige Kamera inklusive Ultraweitwinkel sowie Makrolinse. Das Arbeitstempo allerdings ist nicht hoch und die Knipse kommt vor allem bei wenig Licht nicht an Spitzen-Handys heran.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.11.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Computerbild Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 hat alles, was man vom einem sehr ordentlichen Mittelklasse-Smartphone erwartet: ein beeindruckend kontrastreiches OLED-Display, ein modernes Design und eine vielseitige Kamera inklusive Ultraweitwinkel sowie Makrolinse. Das Arbeitstempo allerdings ist nicht hoch und die Knipse kommt vor allem bei wenig Licht nicht an Spitzen-Handys heran.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.11.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Computerbild Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 hat alles, was man vom einem sehr ordentlichen Mittelklasse-Smartphone erwartet: ein beeindruckend kontrastreiches OLED-Display, ein modernes Design und eine vielseitige Kamera inklusive Ultraweitwinkel sowie Makrolinse. Das Arbeitstempo allerdings ist nicht hoch und die Knipse kommt vor allem bei wenig Licht nicht an Spitzen-Handys heran.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.10.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Computerbild Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 hat alles, was man vom einem sehr ordentlichen Mittelklasse-Smartphone erwartet: ein beeindruckend kontrastreiches OLED-Display, ein modernes Design und eine vielseitige Kamera inklusive Ultraweitwinkel sowie Makrolinse. Das Arbeitstempo allerdings ist nicht hoch und die Knipse kommt vor allem bei wenig Licht nicht an Spitzen-Handys heran.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.10.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Curved Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 überzeugt an vielen Stellen, denn der Hersteller setzt sinnvolle Prioritäten: Das Smartphone besitzt ein AMOLED-Display, viel Speicherplatz, einen Fingerabdrucksensor im Display, eine sehr gute Akkulaufzeit, Dolby-Atmos-Soundverbesserung und eine brauchbare Kamera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.09.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 89% Leistung: 92% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 94%
Quelle: Curved Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 überzeugt an vielen Stellen, denn der Hersteller setzt sinnvolle Prioritäten: Das Smartphone besitzt ein AMOLED-Display, viel Speicherplatz, einen Fingerabdrucksensor im Display, eine sehr gute Akkulaufzeit, Dolby-Atmos-Soundverbesserung und eine brauchbare Kamera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.09.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 89% Leistung: 92% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 94%
Quelle: Curved Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 überzeugt an vielen Stellen, denn der Hersteller setzt sinnvolle Prioritäten: Das Smartphone besitzt ein AMOLED-Display, viel Speicherplatz, einen Fingerabdrucksensor im Display, eine sehr gute Akkulaufzeit, Dolby-Atmos-Soundverbesserung und eine brauchbare Kamera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Leistung: 92% Bildschirm: 92% Mobilität: 94%
Quelle: Curved Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 überzeugt an vielen Stellen, denn der Hersteller setzt sinnvolle Prioritäten: Das Smartphone besitzt ein AMOLED-Display, viel Speicherplatz, einen Fingerabdrucksensor im Display, eine sehr gute Akkulaufzeit, Dolby-Atmos-Soundverbesserung und eine brauchbare Kamera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Leistung: 92% Bildschirm: 92% Mobilität: 94%
Quelle: Techtest.org Archive.org version
Ja das Samsung Galaxy A51 Duos A515F ist ein klasse Smartphone in der 300€ Preisklasse und hier auch generell voll zu empfehlen. Dieses bietet eine sehr gute rundum Leistung, ist aber auch nicht perfekt. Ziemlich perfekt ist das Design. Das A51 ist top verarbeitetet und sieht dank des Glas Designs hervorragend und modern aus.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.05.2020
Quelle: Techtest.org Archive.org version
Ja das Samsung Galaxy A51 Duos A515F ist ein klasse Smartphone in der 300€ Preisklasse und hier auch generell voll zu empfehlen. Dieses bietet eine sehr gute rundum Leistung, ist aber auch nicht perfekt. Ziemlich perfekt ist das Design. Das A51 ist top verarbeitetet und sieht dank des Glas Designs hervorragend und modern aus.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.05.2020
Quelle: Inside Handy Archive.org version
Was bekommt man also für derzeit rund 300 Euro? Nun, zunächst einmal ein grundsolides Smartphone, dem auf den ersten Blick an Nichts fehlt. Man könnte sogar meinen, es handelt sich sogar um ein deutlich teureres Modell. Insbesondere das OLED-Display vermittelt diesen Eindruck.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Inside Handy Archive.org version
Was bekommt man also für derzeit rund 300 Euro? Nun, zunächst einmal ein grundsolides Smartphone, dem auf den ersten Blick an Nichts fehlt. Man könnte sogar meinen, es handelt sich sogar um ein deutlich teureres Modell. Insbesondere das OLED-Display vermittelt diesen Eindruck.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android User Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 ist ein Mittelklasse Smartphone mit großem Akku sowie der Möglichkeit der Speichererweiterung. Die Kamera ist in Ordnung und erstellt bei guten Lichtverhältnissen brauchbare Bilder, kann jedoch nicht mit einer Oberklasse-Smartphone-Kamera verglichen werden.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.03.2020
Quelle: Android User Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 ist ein Mittelklasse Smartphone mit großem Akku sowie der Möglichkeit der Speichererweiterung. Die Kamera ist in Ordnung und erstellt bei guten Lichtverhältnissen brauchbare Bilder, kann jedoch nicht mit einer Oberklasse-Smartphone-Kamera verglichen werden.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.03.2020
Quelle: Cyberbloc Archive.org version
Während sich die vermeintliche Oberklasse immer häufiger und immer selbstbewusster im Preisbereich jenseits der 1.000 Euro tummelt, etabliert sich in der Smartphone-Welt eine Mittelklasse, die coole Features zu erschwinglichen Preisen bietet. Das Konzept kommt an, wie der Siegeszug von Honor oder Xiaomi zeigt. Und auch Samsung kann hier mitmischen, schließlich schob sich das Galaxy A50 laut GIGA mal eben auf Position 5 der beliebtesten Smartphones 2019 und Canalys beschrieb es mit 3,2 Millionen verkauften Stück allein im Quartal 2/2019 als erfolgreichstes Smartphone Europas.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Cyberbloc Archive.org version
Während sich die vermeintliche Oberklasse immer häufiger und immer selbstbewusster im Preisbereich jenseits der 1.000 Euro tummelt, etabliert sich in der Smartphone-Welt eine Mittelklasse, die coole Features zu erschwinglichen Preisen bietet. Das Konzept kommt an, wie der Siegeszug von Honor oder Xiaomi zeigt. Und auch Samsung kann hier mitmischen, schließlich schob sich das Galaxy A50 laut GIGA mal eben auf Position 5 der beliebtesten Smartphones 2019 und Canalys beschrieb es mit 3,2 Millionen verkauften Stück allein im Quartal 2/2019 als erfolgreichstes Smartphone Europas.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Stage Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 ist trotz Kunststoff auf der Rückseite modern und schick und leistet sich keine echten Schwächen. Highlights sind das tolle Display und die Kamera, die in der Mittelklasse voll überzeugt. Auch die Speichermenge für Daten ist sehr gut. Die restliche Ausstattung ist vollumfänglich, ohne besondere Highlights zu bieten.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.03.2020
Quelle: Tech Stage Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 ist trotz Kunststoff auf der Rückseite modern und schick und leistet sich keine echten Schwächen. Highlights sind das tolle Display und die Kamera, die in der Mittelklasse voll überzeugt. Auch die Speichermenge für Daten ist sehr gut. Die restliche Ausstattung ist vollumfänglich, ohne besondere Highlights zu bieten.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.03.2020
Quelle: Chinahandys.net Archive.org version
Das „Galaxy Multitalent“ Samsung A51 hat es alles andere als einfach auf dem Markt. Redmi und seit kurzem auch Realme belagern die Mittelklasse mit leistungsstarken Modellen. Da ist ein kleines Face-Lift zum A50 einfach nicht genug. Das Samsung Galaxy A51 ist dabei zwar kein schlechtes Smartphone, aber bis auf das spitzenmäßige Display ist alles einfach so lala.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net Archive.org version
Das „Galaxy Multitalent“ Samsung A51 hat es alles andere als einfach auf dem Markt. Redmi und seit kurzem auch Realme belagern die Mittelklasse mit leistungsstarken Modellen. Da ist ein kleines Face-Lift zum A50 einfach nicht genug. Das Samsung Galaxy A51 ist dabei zwar kein schlechtes Smartphone, aber bis auf das spitzenmäßige Display ist alles einfach so lala.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Curved Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 überzeugt, weil es eine gekonnte Weiterentwicklung des Galaxy A50 ist. Quantensprünge wurden zwischen den Modellen zwar nicht gemacht, jedoch merkliche Verbesserungen. Das A51 behält dabei den Wohlfühlcharakter des Vorgängers dank des guten Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnisses bei, schraubt an einigen Stellen aber noch einmal ein bisschen hoch.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.02.2020
Quelle: Curved Archive.org version
Das Samsung Galaxy A51 überzeugt, weil es eine gekonnte Weiterentwicklung des Galaxy A50 ist. Quantensprünge wurden zwischen den Modellen zwar nicht gemacht, jedoch merkliche Verbesserungen. Das A51 behält dabei den Wohlfühlcharakter des Vorgängers dank des guten Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnisses bei, schraubt an einigen Stellen aber noch einmal ein bisschen hoch.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.02.2020
Quelle: WinFuture Archive.org version
Das OLED-Display des Mittelklasse-Smartphones ist 6,5 Zoll groß und wurde im 20:9-Format gefertigt. Am oberen Rand des Bildschirms lässt sich eine "Punch Hole"-Kamera, die eine 32-Megapixel-Auflösung bietet, finden. Im Inneren des Geräts kommt ein Exynos 9611 SoC mit Octacore-CPU, die mit bis zu zwei Gigahertz pro Kern taktet, zum Einsatz.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.01.2020
Quelle: WinFuture Archive.org version
Das OLED-Display des Mittelklasse-Smartphones ist 6,5 Zoll groß und wurde im 20:9-Format gefertigt. Am oberen Rand des Bildschirms lässt sich eine "Punch Hole"-Kamera, die eine 32-Megapixel-Auflösung bietet, finden. Im Inneren des Geräts kommt ein Exynos 9611 SoC mit Octacore-CPU, die mit bis zu zwei Gigahertz pro Kern taktet, zum Einsatz.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.01.2020
Quelle: A1 Blog Archive.org version
Mit dem Galaxy A51 legt Samsung gleich zum Start des neuen Jahres ein sehr solides Mittelklasse-Smartphone vor. Und gibt uns genau das, was sich viele von einem Telefon erwarten: Ein großes, randloses Display, eine vielseitige Kamera und einen lange ausdauernden Akku.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.01.2020
Quelle: A1 Blog Archive.org version
Mit dem Galaxy A51 legt Samsung gleich zum Start des neuen Jahres ein sehr solides Mittelklasse-Smartphone vor. Und gibt uns genau das, was sich viele von einem Telefon erwarten: Ein großes, randloses Display, eine vielseitige Kamera und einen lange ausdauernden Akku.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.01.2020
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The MSRP of the Samsung Galaxy A51 has dropped to just $349.99, and it can be had for much less. You can easily find the phone for under $300 if you shop around. At that price, it’s hard to ignore the value Samsung is offering with the phone. With the A51, you’re getting a really great screen, decent build quality, some okay cameras, and even a headphone jack. It’s also offering three years of guaranteed software updates which guarantees support until at least Android 12. However, while the build quality and screen are also great, the sub-par performance of this phone is its Achilles heel. And for the retail price of $349, the competition is very, very high. The iPhone SE has Apple’s newest processor and equally great build quality for the same price, and the Google Pixel 4a has a fantastic Android experience and wonderful camera for $350. And if you’re willing to spend more but not $1,000, Samsung also offers the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, which has many of the same features as the full-fledged Galaxy S20 for $699 before trade-in.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 60% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The MSRP of the Samsung Galaxy A51 has dropped to just $349.99, and it can be had for much less. You can easily find the phone for under $300 if you shop around. At that price, it’s hard to ignore the value Samsung is offering with the phone. With the A51, you’re getting a really great screen, decent build quality, some okay cameras, and even a headphone jack. It’s also offering three years of guaranteed software updates which guarantees support until at least Android 12. However, while the build quality and screen are also great, the sub-par performance of this phone is its Achilles heel. And for the retail price of $349, the competition is very, very high. The iPhone SE has Apple’s newest processor and equally great build quality for the same price, and the Google Pixel 4a has a fantastic Android experience and wonderful camera for $350. And if you’re willing to spend more but not $1,000, Samsung also offers the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, which has many of the same features as the full-fledged Galaxy S20 for $699 before trade-in.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 60% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The MSRP of the Samsung Galaxy A51 has dropped to just $349.99, and it can be had for much less. You can easily find the phone for under $300 if you shop around. At that price, it’s hard to ignore the value Samsung is offering with the phone. With the A51, you’re getting a really great screen, decent build quality, some okay cameras, and even a headphone jack. It’s also offering three years of guaranteed software updates which guarantees support until at least Android 12. However, while the build quality and screen are also great, the sub-par performance of this phone is its Achilles heel. And for the retail price of $349, the competition is very, very high. The iPhone SE has Apple’s newest processor and equally great build quality for the same price, and the Google Pixel 4a has a fantastic Android experience and wonderful camera for $350. And if you’re willing to spend more but not $1,000, Samsung also offers the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, which has many of the same features as the full-fledged Galaxy S20 for $699 before trade-in.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 60% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The MSRP of the Samsung Galaxy A51 has dropped to just $349.99, and it can be had for much less. You can easily find the phone for under $300 if you shop around. At that price, it’s hard to ignore the value Samsung is offering with the phone. With the A51, you’re getting a really great screen, decent build quality, some okay cameras, and even a headphone jack. It’s also offering three years of guaranteed software updates which guarantees support until at least Android 12. However, while the build quality and screen are also great, the sub-par performance of this phone is its Achilles heel. And for the retail price of $349, the competition is very, very high. The iPhone SE has Apple’s newest processor and equally great build quality for the same price, and the Google Pixel 4a has a fantastic Android experience and wonderful camera for $350. And if you’re willing to spend more but not $1,000, Samsung also offers the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, which has many of the same features as the full-fledged Galaxy S20 for $699 before trade-in.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 60% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The MSRP of the Samsung Galaxy A51 has dropped to just $349.99, and it can be had for much less. You can easily find the phone for under $300 if you shop around. At that price, it’s hard to ignore the value Samsung is offering with the phone. With the A51, you’re getting a really great screen, decent build quality, some okay cameras, and even a headphone jack. It’s also offering three years of guaranteed software updates which guarantees support until at least Android 12. However, while the build quality and screen are also great, the sub-par performance of this phone is its Achilles heel. And for the retail price of $349, the competition is very, very high.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 60% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The MSRP of the Samsung Galaxy A51 has dropped to just $349.99, and it can be had for much less. You can easily find the phone for under $300 if you shop around. At that price, it’s hard to ignore the value Samsung is offering with the phone. With the A51, you’re getting a really great screen, decent build quality, some okay cameras, and even a headphone jack. It’s also offering three years of guaranteed software updates which guarantees support until at least Android 12. However, while the build quality and screen are also great, the sub-par performance of this phone is its Achilles heel. And for the retail price of $349, the competition is very, very high.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 60% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
Other parts of the phone are solid. And complaints about low-light camera performance, the opportunism of the patchy ‘quad-camera’ array, and less than flagship level screen brightness apply to most at the price. That the Samsung Galaxy A51 operates more like a phone from the tier below is hard to forget, though.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
Other parts of the phone are solid. And complaints about low-light camera performance, the opportunism of the patchy ‘quad-camera’ array, and less than flagship level screen brightness apply to most at the price. That the Samsung Galaxy A51 operates more like a phone from the tier below is hard to forget, though.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Galaxy A51 shares the same fundamentals as the Galaxy A50 and A50s. The 48MP camera takes decent shots during the day, you get all-day battery life, a vibrant AMOLED display, 3.5mm jack, and Android 10. But the hardware just doesn't hold up anymore, and there are much better alternatives available at the same price point.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Galaxy A51 shares the same fundamentals as the Galaxy A50 and A50s. The 48MP camera takes decent shots during the day, you get all-day battery life, a vibrant AMOLED display, 3.5mm jack, and Android 10. But the hardware just doesn't hold up anymore, and there are much better alternatives available at the same price point.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
This phone is not one of our favorites at the price, largely because of its flawed general performance. It feels a little too slow day-to-day at the price, even if it can run most popular 3D games perfectly well.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
This phone is not one of our favorites at the price, largely because of its flawed general performance. It feels a little too slow day-to-day at the price, even if it can run most popular 3D games perfectly well.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Ricks Tech
In this video im doing a screen replacement on a Samsung Galaxy A51. i did have a video of this from last year but this has been done with the new camera, for much better focus. Note: i do say A51s, this not that, the A51s is a snapdragon version from india.
Support, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.03.2021
Quelle: Ricks Tech
In this video im doing a screen replacement on a Samsung Galaxy A51. i did have a video of this from last year but this has been done with the new camera, for much better focus. Note: i do say A51s, this not that, the A51s is a snapdragon version from india.
Support, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.03.2021
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
For the retail price of $399, the competition is very, very high. The iPhone SE has Apple’s newest processor and equally great build quality for the same price, and the Google Pixel 4a has a fantastic Android experience and wonderful camera for $350. And if you’re willing to spend more but not $1,000, Samsung has just released the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, which has many of the same features of the full-fledged Galaxy S20 for $699 before trade-in. If you are looking for something similar with a little more power though, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is out now as well.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.09.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 62% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 78%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
For the retail price of $399, the competition is very, very high. The iPhone SE has Apple’s newest processor and equally great build quality for the same price, and the Google Pixel 4a has a fantastic Android experience and wonderful camera for $350. And if you’re willing to spend more but not $1,000, Samsung has just released the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, which has many of the same features of the full-fledged Galaxy S20 for $699 before trade-in. If you are looking for something similar with a little more power though, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is out now as well.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.09.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 62% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 78%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
This phone is not one of our favorites at the price, largely because of its flawed general performance. It feels a little too slow day-to-day at the price, even if it can run most popular 3D games perfectly well.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.08.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
This phone is not one of our favorites at the price, largely because of its flawed general performance. It feels a little too slow day-to-day at the price, even if it can run most popular 3D games perfectly well.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.08.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is an affordable way to get a good-looking Galaxy phone, but it makes Android feel a little too slow for us to wholeheartedly recommend it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is an affordable way to get a good-looking Galaxy phone, but it makes Android feel a little too slow for us to wholeheartedly recommend it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: 9to5google EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung gets a lot right with the Galaxy A51. The display is excellent, the design is really nice, the camera is passable, and the price is great, too! It really only struggles in the performance department. Admittedly, that’s a huge area of concern and may be a deal-breaker for you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.07.2020
Quelle: 9to5google EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung gets a lot right with the Galaxy A51. The display is excellent, the design is really nice, the camera is passable, and the price is great, too! It really only struggles in the performance department. Admittedly, that’s a huge area of concern and may be a deal-breaker for you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.07.2020
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
And that's before you account for the fact that it's the most affordable point of entry into 5G coming from Samsung. It's not as good value as what Xiaomi can give you, but competing offers from other big names like LG and Motorola come at an even larger premium if they're available at all. As such, the Galaxy A51 5G is shaping up to be an easy recommendation for early 5G adopters that would like to reap the benefits of the faster connectivity without shelling flagship money.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
And that's before you account for the fact that it's the most affordable point of entry into 5G coming from Samsung. It's not as good value as what Xiaomi can give you, but competing offers from other big names like LG and Motorola come at an even larger premium if they're available at all. As such, the Galaxy A51 5G is shaping up to be an easy recommendation for early 5G adopters that would like to reap the benefits of the faster connectivity without shelling flagship money.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is an affordable way to get a good-looking Galaxy phone, but it makes Android feel a little too slow for us to wholeheartedly recommend it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is an affordable way to get a good-looking Galaxy phone, but it makes Android feel a little too slow for us to wholeheartedly recommend it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
With the A51, you’re getting a really great screen, decent build quality, some okay cameras, and even a headphone jack. While the build quality and screen are great, however, the sub-par performance of this phone is its Achilles heel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
With the A51, you’re getting a really great screen, decent build quality, some okay cameras, and even a headphone jack. While the build quality and screen are great, however, the sub-par performance of this phone is its Achilles heel.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65% Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Talk Android EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 is a well-made smartphone with an interesting if unobtrusively pattern on the rear panel with all-day battery life, a fabulous AMOLED display, great customization options, and a dependable camera. Sadly, it’s let down by the sluggish processor and over-shadowed by handsets with similar price-points that have better cameras and more powerful chipsets. It’s a case of a decent phone being let down by an Exynos processor, a scenario that we’ve seen play out on much more expensive Samsung smartphones over the past couple of years.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.06.2020
Quelle: Talk Android EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 is a well-made smartphone with an interesting if unobtrusively pattern on the rear panel with all-day battery life, a fabulous AMOLED display, great customization options, and a dependable camera. Sadly, it’s let down by the sluggish processor and over-shadowed by handsets with similar price-points that have better cameras and more powerful chipsets. It’s a case of a decent phone being let down by an Exynos processor, a scenario that we’ve seen play out on much more expensive Samsung smartphones over the past couple of years.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.06.2020
Quelle: Pocket Lint EN→DE Archive.org version
A great design and screen are the big sells of this mid-ranger, which performs generally well but can struggle a little when it comes to gaming tasks. Otherwise the clean software experience makes for a generally polished and affordable choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Pocket Lint EN→DE Archive.org version
A great design and screen are the big sells of this mid-ranger, which performs generally well but can struggle a little when it comes to gaming tasks. Otherwise the clean software experience makes for a generally polished and affordable choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: CNet EN→DE Archive.org version
It's disappointing that the Galaxy A51 lacks water resistance. Most modern phones have it, though it's typical for budget devices to have no waterproofing or simply be "splash resistant." The A51's all-day battery life takes it from morning to night, and it lasted an average of 16 hours, 10 minutes after three looping video tests in airplane mode. I'll update this review with the results of our steaming lab tests over Wi-Fi when they're complete.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: CNet EN→DE Archive.org version
It's disappointing that the Galaxy A51 lacks water resistance. Most modern phones have it, though it's typical for budget devices to have no waterproofing or simply be "splash resistant." The A51's all-day battery life takes it from morning to night, and it lasted an average of 16 hours, 10 minutes after three looping video tests in airplane mode. I'll update this review with the results of our steaming lab tests over Wi-Fi when they're complete.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Engadget EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung’s Galaxy A51 packs a great screen, a handful of cameras, and a big battery -- what more could you ask from a mid-range smartphone? Well, more consistent performance, for one. Despite using a reasonably powerful chipset, the A51 is often plagued by slow app launches and laggy animations, to the point when it sometimes feels like a device that costs much less. Battery life wasn’t as good as we had hoped for, either. While Samsung got a lot right with the Galaxy A51, it never feels as consistently nice to use as some of truly great devices available in its price range.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73%
Quelle: Engadget Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.05.2020
Quelle: Engadget EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung’s Galaxy A51 packs a great screen, a handful of cameras, and a big battery -- what more could you ask from a mid-range smartphone? Well, more consistent performance, for one. Despite using a reasonably powerful chipset, the A51 is often plagued by slow app launches and laggy animations, to the point when it sometimes feels like a device that costs much less. Battery life wasn’t as good as we had hoped for, either. While Samsung got a lot right with the Galaxy A51, it never feels as consistently nice to use as some of truly great devices available in its price range.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73%
Quelle: Engadget Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.05.2020
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE Archive.org version
At $400, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is a perfectly good Android phone for many users. It has a big, crisp AMOLED display, long battery life, and sharp cameras. If it had a faster processor, you'd be seeing a higher score here. If you’re not a diehard Android fan and don't mind a smaller display, the iPhone SE is a significantly more powerful phone, and it's guaranteed to receive software updates for years to come. For Android enthusiasts, meanwhile, the Pixel 3a gets you more power and reliable software updates, while the Moto G Power offers longer battery life than the A51 for $150 less.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE Archive.org version
At $400, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is a perfectly good Android phone for many users. It has a big, crisp AMOLED display, long battery life, and sharp cameras. If it had a faster processor, you'd be seeing a higher score here. If you’re not a diehard Android fan and don't mind a smaller display, the iPhone SE is a significantly more powerful phone, and it's guaranteed to receive software updates for years to come. For Android enthusiasts, meanwhile, the Pixel 3a gets you more power and reliable software updates, while the Moto G Power offers longer battery life than the A51 for $150 less.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: CNet EN→DE Archive.org version
How good can a $400 phone really be? When the device in question is the Samsung Galaxy A51, the answer is simple: very good. As the first real representative of the Galaxy A family in the US, the A51 is a convincing effort that proves Samsung can make a good midprice phone that's worth buying. In fact, Samsung's budget phone (£329 in the UK and AU$599 in Australia) even bests the iPhone SE (which starts at $399, £419 and AU$749), in some specific, and significant, ways. When it comes to screen size and clarity, phone features, camera quality and performance, the Galaxy A51 delivers where it counts, with one exception.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tech Switch EN→DE Archive.org version
It’s disappointing that the Galaxy A51 lacks water resistance. Most fashionable telephones have it, although it is typical for finances gadgets to don’t have any waterproofing or just be “splash resistant.” The A51’s all-day battery life takes it from morning to nighttime, and it lasted a median of 16 hours, 10 minutes after three looping video assessments in airplane mode. I’ll replace this evaluation with the outcomes of our steaming lab assessments over Wi-Fi once they’re full. Luckily, the A51 additionally features a 15-watt quick charger within the field, however in contrast to the Galaxy S20 telephones, you may want to provide your personal headphones and any USB-C to USB-C cables you might have considered trying. It does include a USB-A to USB-C wire, nevertheless.Although cellphone releases have slowed down, the Galaxy A51 is certainly one of not less than 16 telephones popping out in 2020. Samsung has additionally confirmed plans to make one other foldable cellphone.Galaxy A51 vs iPhone SE.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.05.2020
Quelle: CNet EN→DE Archive.org version
How good can a $400 phone really be? When the device in question is the Samsung Galaxy A51, the answer is simple: very good. As the first real representative of the Galaxy A family in the US, the A51 is a convincing effort that proves Samsung can make a good midprice phone that's worth buying. In fact, Samsung's budget phone (£329 in the UK and AU$599 in Australia) even bests the iPhone SE (which starts at $399, £419 and AU$749), in some specific, and significant, ways. When it comes to screen size and clarity, phone features, camera quality and performance, the Galaxy A51 delivers where it counts, with one exception.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tech Switch EN→DE Archive.org version
It’s disappointing that the Galaxy A51 lacks water resistance. Most fashionable telephones have it, although it is typical for finances gadgets to don’t have any waterproofing or just be “splash resistant.” The A51’s all-day battery life takes it from morning to nighttime, and it lasted a median of 16 hours, 10 minutes after three looping video assessments in airplane mode. I’ll replace this evaluation with the outcomes of our steaming lab assessments over Wi-Fi once they’re full. Luckily, the A51 additionally features a 15-watt quick charger within the field, however in contrast to the Galaxy S20 telephones, you may want to provide your personal headphones and any USB-C to USB-C cables you might have considered trying. It does include a USB-A to USB-C wire, nevertheless.Although cellphone releases have slowed down, the Galaxy A51 is certainly one of not less than 16 telephones popping out in 2020. Samsung has additionally confirmed plans to make one other foldable cellphone.Galaxy A51 vs iPhone SE.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.05.2020
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 doesn’t look or feel like a cheap phone at all. It is big and well-put-together. Samsung says that the material it’s made out of is called “Glasstic,” which sounds way chintzier than it feels. It feels nearly like glass, but it has just a bit of that hollow feel you can get from plastic.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 doesn’t look or feel like a cheap phone at all. It is big and well-put-together. Samsung says that the material it’s made out of is called “Glasstic,” which sounds way chintzier than it feels. It feels nearly like glass, but it has just a bit of that hollow feel you can get from plastic.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 offers a nice design and attractive OLED display, but it’s hamstrung by middling performance, cameras that underperform in low light and relatively short battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech Switch EN→DE Archive.org version
It’s disappointing that the Galaxy A51 lacks water resistance. Most trendy telephones have it, although it is typical for price range units to haven’t any waterproofing or just be “splash resistant.” All-day battery life will take the A51 from morning to nighttime, and the telephone lasted a median of 16 hours, 10 minutes after three looping video exams in airplane mode. I’ll replace this assessment with the outcomes of our steaming lab exams over Wi-Fi once they’re full. Luckily, the A51 additionally features a 15-watt quick charger within the field, however in contrast to the Galaxy S20 telephones, you may want to provide your individual headphones and any USB-C to USB-C cables you might have considered trying. It does include a USB-A to USB-C wire, nonetheless.Although telephone releases have slowed down, the Galaxy A51 is considered one of at the very least 16 telephones popping out in 2020. Samsung has additionally confirmed plans to make one other foldable telephone.Galaxy A51 vs iPhone SE.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.05.2020
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 offers a nice design and attractive OLED display, but it’s hamstrung by middling performance, cameras that underperform in low light and relatively short battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech Switch EN→DE Archive.org version
It’s disappointing that the Galaxy A51 lacks water resistance. Most trendy telephones have it, although it is typical for price range units to haven’t any waterproofing or just be “splash resistant.” All-day battery life will take the A51 from morning to nighttime, and the telephone lasted a median of 16 hours, 10 minutes after three looping video exams in airplane mode. I’ll replace this assessment with the outcomes of our steaming lab exams over Wi-Fi once they’re full. Luckily, the A51 additionally features a 15-watt quick charger within the field, however in contrast to the Galaxy S20 telephones, you may want to provide your individual headphones and any USB-C to USB-C cables you might have considered trying. It does include a USB-A to USB-C wire, nonetheless.Although telephone releases have slowed down, the Galaxy A51 is considered one of at the very least 16 telephones popping out in 2020. Samsung has additionally confirmed plans to make one other foldable telephone.Galaxy A51 vs iPhone SE.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.05.2020
Quelle: Mobile Tech Review Archive.org version
Lisa Gade reviews the Samsung Galaxy A51 midrange Android smartphone that sells for $399. It’s available worldwide, and in the US is offered by AT&T, Sprint, Verizon, Comcast and unlocked (compatible with T-Mobile). This is a 4G LTE Android 10 phone with OneUI 2.0 and a 6.5” Super AMOLED FHD+ display. Despite the low price you get a modern and attractive design, quad rear cameras with a 48MP main camera, 32MP selfie camera and a 15 watt fast charger in the box. It has 4GB RAM, 128GB storage and a microSD card slot. And yes, it has a headphone jack! In the US it competes with the Google Pixel 3a XL and the 2020 iPhone SE.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.05.2020
Quelle: Mobile Tech Review Archive.org version
Lisa Gade reviews the Samsung Galaxy A51 midrange Android smartphone that sells for $399. It’s available worldwide, and in the US is offered by AT&T, Sprint, Verizon, Comcast and unlocked (compatible with T-Mobile). This is a 4G LTE Android 10 phone with OneUI 2.0 and a 6.5” Super AMOLED FHD+ display. Despite the low price you get a modern and attractive design, quad rear cameras with a 48MP main camera, 32MP selfie camera and a 15 watt fast charger in the box. It has 4GB RAM, 128GB storage and a microSD card slot. And yes, it has a headphone jack! In the US it competes with the Google Pixel 3a XL and the 2020 iPhone SE.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.05.2020
Quelle: T3 EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 packs a nice big display and a light, ergonomic design as sleek as its flagship siblings. A good budget phone for Samsung fans that want the look of the S20 and Note series.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: T3 EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 packs a nice big display and a light, ergonomic design as sleek as its flagship siblings. A good budget phone for Samsung fans that want the look of the S20 and Note series.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
The A51 proves Samsung can make solid mid-range phones. Its flagship-esque design and solid cameras provide the foundations for an excellent handset, while One UI provides an excellent user experience. However, performance is less than impressive, while the poor in-display fingerprint scanner is a big letdown. Samsung fans can look beyond these shortcomings, but at this price point the A51 is hard to recommend.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
The A51 proves Samsung can make solid mid-range phones. Its flagship-esque design and solid cameras provide the foundations for an excellent handset, while One UI provides an excellent user experience. However, performance is less than impressive, while the poor in-display fingerprint scanner is a big letdown. Samsung fans can look beyond these shortcomings, but at this price point the A51 is hard to recommend.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 is a phone that’s worth considering, given its decent all-round performance; its camera versatility is impressive, the screen is enjoyable to watch content on, and it looks good too, which doesn’t hurt. But if you take a look around, you’ll find devices with better processors and better cameras for the same price, so you might want to look elsewhere if those are your top priorities.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 is a phone that’s worth considering, given its decent all-round performance; its camera versatility is impressive, the screen is enjoyable to watch content on, and it looks good too, which doesn’t hurt. But if you take a look around, you’ll find devices with better processors and better cameras for the same price, so you might want to look elsewhere if those are your top priorities.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Neowin EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 isn't necessarily a bad phone, but it's a phone that I feel does very little to justify the €369 (€399 in Portugal) price tag that it commands. In my (admittedly short) experience with reviewing phones, I've never been so thoroughly disappointed with so many aspects of a phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65%
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 improves on certain aspects that were required, such as a better camera, improved display and better battery life. Although, at the price of Rs 23,999, it feels slightly overpriced for the kind of feature and performance it offers. But, with improved performance, display, battery, design and camera, the Galaxy A51 provides a good balance between features, price and performance. It’s more than a competent phone for those who are looking at a mid-range device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Neowin EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 isn't necessarily a bad phone, but it's a phone that I feel does very little to justify the €369 (€399 in Portugal) price tag that it commands. In my (admittedly short) experience with reviewing phones, I've never been so thoroughly disappointed with so many aspects of a phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65%
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 improves on certain aspects that were required, such as a better camera, improved display and better battery life. Although, at the price of Rs 23,999, it feels slightly overpriced for the kind of feature and performance it offers. But, with improved performance, display, battery, design and camera, the Galaxy A51 provides a good balance between features, price and performance. It’s more than a competent phone for those who are looking at a mid-range device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech ARP EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is one of the best mid-range smartphones you can buy today, and one of the main reason (in addition to its 32 MP selfie camera) is its combination of 48 MP, Ultra Wide and macro cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.03.2020
Quelle: Tech ARP EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is one of the best mid-range smartphones you can buy today, and one of the main reason (in addition to its 32 MP selfie camera) is its combination of 48 MP, Ultra Wide and macro cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.03.2020
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 shares the same fundamentals of last year's A50 and A50s. The 48MP camera takes decent shots during the day, you get all-day battery life, a vibrant AMOLED display, 3.5mm jack, and Android 10. But the hardware just doesn't hold up in 2020, and there are much better alternatives available at the same price point.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 shares the same fundamentals of last year's A50 and A50s. The 48MP camera takes decent shots during the day, you get all-day battery life, a vibrant AMOLED display, 3.5mm jack, and Android 10. But the hardware just doesn't hold up in 2020, and there are much better alternatives available at the same price point.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech2.in.com EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 looks quite good, especially in blue. It has a premium design. The phone also has a good day camera, but it struggles a bit with night photography. The battery of the phone lasts long and charges reasonably fast.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Tech2.in.com EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 looks quite good, especially in blue. It has a premium design. The phone also has a good day camera, but it struggles a bit with night photography. The battery of the phone lasts long and charges reasonably fast.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
Despite the exterior makeover and added camera features, the Galaxy A51 uses the same set of internals found on the Galaxy A50s: Exynos 9611, 6GB RAM, 128GB internal storage, and a 4000mAh battery with 15w wired charging. While the Exynos 9611 may be a generation old (Samsung’s current mid-range Exynos processor is the 5G-capable Exynos 980), the Galaxy A51 is capable of running today’s popular games smoothly. We tried playing Asphalt 9: Legends with the Galaxy A51 during our short time with it, and the experience was smooth even at high-quality graphics settings.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.02.2020
Quelle: Fone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A51 comes in a single 6GB RAM + 128GB storage option, is priced at Rs. 23,999, and is available on Samsung India e-Store, Flipkart, and Amazon.in. The A51 gets few things right like the great display, versatile camera setup, sleek design, and slim form factor. But it does not pack the power, considering Rs. 23,999 price point. One UI 2.0 is certainly clean and minimalistic, but on the Galaxy A51, the noticeable lag is a bit not up to the mark. Samsung’s own Galaxy M31 that costs Rs. 12,999 packs the same SoC. The pricing of the Galaxy A51 could have been competitive and considering this is positioned as a mid-range smartphone, Samsung could have packed in a powerful processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.02.2020
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
Despite the exterior makeover and added camera features, the Galaxy A51 uses the same set of internals found on the Galaxy A50s: Exynos 9611, 6GB RAM, 128GB internal storage, and a 4000mAh battery with 15w wired charging. While the Exynos 9611 may be a generation old (Samsung’s current mid-range Exynos processor is the 5G-capable Exynos 980), the Galaxy A51 is capable of running today’s popular games smoothly. We tried playing Asphalt 9: Legends with the Galaxy A51 during our short time with it, and the experience was smooth even at high-quality graphics settings.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.02.2020
Quelle: Fone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A51 comes in a single 6GB RAM + 128GB storage option, is priced at Rs. 23,999, and is available on Samsung India e-Store, Flipkart, and Amazon.in. The A51 gets few things right like the great display, versatile camera setup, sleek design, and slim form factor. But it does not pack the power, considering Rs. 23,999 price point. One UI 2.0 is certainly clean and minimalistic, but on the Galaxy A51, the noticeable lag is a bit not up to the mark. Samsung’s own Galaxy M31 that costs Rs. 12,999 packs the same SoC. The pricing of the Galaxy A51 could have been competitive and considering this is positioned as a mid-range smartphone, Samsung could have packed in a powerful processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.02.2020
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE Archive.org version
If you’re having trouble figuring out how to take a good photo, you might want to consider turning on Shot Suggestion which can help suggest where to point your camera for the perfect shot. With all that said, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is quite a capable and versatile midrange camera phone that can take surprisingly good pictures in almost any situation from macro to landscape photography.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.02.2020
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE Archive.org version
If you’re having trouble figuring out how to take a good photo, you might want to consider turning on Shot Suggestion which can help suggest where to point your camera for the perfect shot. With all that said, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is quite a capable and versatile midrange camera phone that can take surprisingly good pictures in almost any situation from macro to landscape photography.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.02.2020
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE Archive.org version
After making it big with the Galaxy A50 and A50s, Samsung has now released the Galaxy A51. The brand has chosen not to tinker too much with the formula that worked with those two phones. But has increased its price. Do the additions to the package justify the increased price tag?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE Archive.org version
After making it big with the Galaxy A50 and A50s, Samsung has now released the Galaxy A51. The brand has chosen not to tinker too much with the formula that worked with those two phones. But has increased its price. Do the additions to the package justify the increased price tag?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: NLT EN→DE Archive.org version
All in all, I am unable to recommend one smartphone over the other. They both do share some similarities, but the price scales alongside the performance, camera, and overall battery capacity. For example, if you want to play games on your smartphone – then the Galaxy A71 is great. Else, the Galaxy A51 is fine too.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.02.2020
Quelle: NLT EN→DE Archive.org version
All in all, I am unable to recommend one smartphone over the other. They both do share some similarities, but the price scales alongside the performance, camera, and overall battery capacity. For example, if you want to play games on your smartphone – then the Galaxy A71 is great. Else, the Galaxy A51 is fine too.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.02.2020
Quelle: Stuff TV EN→DE Archive.org version
Others may offer stronger performance, battery life and camera results, but the Galaxy A51 is bursting with great features and excels for movies and music.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Stuff TV EN→DE Archive.org version
Others may offer stronger performance, battery life and camera results, but the Galaxy A51 is bursting with great features and excels for movies and music.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Gogi.in EN→DE Archive.org version
Pretty impressive device, comes with NFC / Samsung Pay and host of interesting features that are hard to find on other devices (do check the video review for more unique features). Price I feel is good enough considering the Samsung brand value.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: Gogi.in EN→DE Archive.org version
Pretty impressive device, comes with NFC / Samsung Pay and host of interesting features that are hard to find on other devices (do check the video review for more unique features). Price I feel is good enough considering the Samsung brand value.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A51 is targeted at users looking for a mid-premium Android option. There’s a lot to like including the Infinity-O display, stylish design as well as good cameras and performance. This is a good buy for those willing to spend up to Rs 24,000. Those looking for alternatives can consider the Redmi K20 Pro, which now starts at Rs 24,999 and offers the better Snapdragon 855 processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A51 is targeted at users looking for a mid-premium Android option. There’s a lot to like including the Infinity-O display, stylish design as well as good cameras and performance. This is a good buy for those willing to spend up to Rs 24,000. Those looking for alternatives can consider the Redmi K20 Pro, which now starts at Rs 24,999 and offers the better Snapdragon 855 processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: India Today EN→DE Archive.org version
It has everything it needs for a mid-range phone right now, and yet it doesn’t for one that’s supposed to go strong into the latter stages of 2020. For a phone that the buyer may want to use for at least the next three years, the Galaxy A51 just doesn’t evoke the kind of confidence with its hardware to warrant an outright recommendation.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung has launched the Galaxy A51 at a slightly higher price than the Galaxy A50s (Review) when it first debuted. For this extra money, you get a fourth rear camera, a more modern-looking hole-punch display, and more RAM. Currently, Samsung has only launched the 6GB variant in India, priced at Rs. 23,999. The company's website however mentions the existence of an 8GB RAM option, but that doesn't appear to be avialable yet.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 offers a sensible package of features and performs well in most key areas. It's one of the lightest handsets in the segment while still having a big display and doesn't sacrifice battery life in the process. Typically for a Samsung, the A51's display leaves little to complain about too. A thorough upgrade in the camera department means good daylight photos from all cameras, with particularly great portraits and a 'macro' cam that's hard to beat. The up to date software at launch, complete with added features which used to be reserved for the flagships until only recently, rounds up a compelling list of pros.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72%
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
Yes, it’s a nice-looking phone that offers a beautiful AMOLED display and very good battery life, and we don’t mind the plastic build at all, but the new cameras don’t offer much of an improvement and are far less capable than the cameras on the rival Pixel 3a, or even iPhone 7. Worse yet, the performance is underwhelming and the phone often stutters when presented with a slightly more difficult task.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: India Today EN→DE Archive.org version
It has everything it needs for a mid-range phone right now, and yet it doesn’t for one that’s supposed to go strong into the latter stages of 2020. For a phone that the buyer may want to use for at least the next three years, the Galaxy A51 just doesn’t evoke the kind of confidence with its hardware to warrant an outright recommendation.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung has launched the Galaxy A51 at a slightly higher price than the Galaxy A50s (Review) when it first debuted. For this extra money, you get a fourth rear camera, a more modern-looking hole-punch display, and more RAM. Currently, Samsung has only launched the 6GB variant in India, priced at Rs. 23,999. The company's website however mentions the existence of an 8GB RAM option, but that doesn't appear to be avialable yet.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 offers a sensible package of features and performs well in most key areas. It's one of the lightest handsets in the segment while still having a big display and doesn't sacrifice battery life in the process. Typically for a Samsung, the A51's display leaves little to complain about too. A thorough upgrade in the camera department means good daylight photos from all cameras, with particularly great portraits and a 'macro' cam that's hard to beat. The up to date software at launch, complete with added features which used to be reserved for the flagships until only recently, rounds up a compelling list of pros.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72%
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
Yes, it’s a nice-looking phone that offers a beautiful AMOLED display and very good battery life, and we don’t mind the plastic build at all, but the new cameras don’t offer much of an improvement and are far less capable than the cameras on the rival Pixel 3a, or even iPhone 7. Worse yet, the performance is underwhelming and the phone often stutters when presented with a slightly more difficult task.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE Archive.org version
To conclude, the Samsung Galaxy A51 comes loaded with a host of interesting features. The Infinity-O display looks good and the new features like useful cards and more seems to be interesting. The camera performance is yet to be tested out. Sadly, the older generation processor might hamper the performance. So, stay tuned with us as we will talk in-depth about the Galaxy A51 in our upcoming review.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.01.2020
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE Archive.org version
To conclude, the Samsung Galaxy A51 comes loaded with a host of interesting features. The Infinity-O display looks good and the new features like useful cards and more seems to be interesting. The camera performance is yet to be tested out. Sadly, the older generation processor might hamper the performance. So, stay tuned with us as we will talk in-depth about the Galaxy A51 in our upcoming review.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.01.2020
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE Archive.org version
Compared to predecessors, the Samsung Galaxy A51 brings incremental upgrades in terms of performance, design and imaging. However, its new user interface has surprise elements that improve the user experience a lot, making it a better than peers and predecessors. It is important to note that the Galaxy A51 enjoys this exclusivity until these software-related features are rolled out as part of software upgrade to the Samsung smartphones of previous generations. Once that happens, the Galaxy A51 will lose its charm.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.01.2020
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE Archive.org version
Compared to predecessors, the Samsung Galaxy A51 brings incremental upgrades in terms of performance, design and imaging. However, its new user interface has surprise elements that improve the user experience a lot, making it a better than peers and predecessors. It is important to note that the Galaxy A51 enjoys this exclusivity until these software-related features are rolled out as part of software upgrade to the Samsung smartphones of previous generations. Once that happens, the Galaxy A51 will lose its charm.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.01.2020
Quelle: Phone World EN→DE Archive.org version
After reading my review, you must thinking about purchasing this smartphone. Certainly this smartphone deserves a chance. I’m pretty sure that Galaxy A 51 will stun the market in terms of sale. I have used this phone and keenly observed all its features. And i’m really impressed. So my final thought on Galaxy A 51 is that it’s worth buying.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.01.2020
Quelle: Phone World EN→DE Archive.org version
After reading my review, you must thinking about purchasing this smartphone. Certainly this smartphone deserves a chance. I’m pretty sure that Galaxy A 51 will stun the market in terms of sale. I have used this phone and keenly observed all its features. And i’m really impressed. So my final thought on Galaxy A 51 is that it’s worth buying.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.01.2020
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
Keeping it juiced is a large 4,500mAh battery with 25W fast charging via a USB Type-C port. In Malaysia, the Galaxy A71 ships in three colours – Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Black and Prism Crush Blue. The chassis is also done up in glasstic so it has properties akin to the A51, with a light carry weight and a mirrored finish that bears up to casual inspection. No word on price or exact launch dates yet but we’ll keep you posted.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.01.2020
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
Keeping it juiced is a large 4,500mAh battery with 25W fast charging via a USB Type-C port. In Malaysia, the Galaxy A71 ships in three colours – Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Black and Prism Crush Blue. The chassis is also done up in glasstic so it has properties akin to the A51, with a light carry weight and a mirrored finish that bears up to casual inspection. No word on price or exact launch dates yet but we’ll keep you posted.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.01.2020
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE Archive.org version
No device will ever be perfect, and there’s always going to be room for improvement. I would have loved to see a beefier processor, faster charging for the battery, a better loudspeaker, and even a telephoto camera. But these devices have to exist within their own realities and to that extent, the Galaxy A51 is quite possibly one of the best smartphones in its category.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.01.2020
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE Archive.org version
No device will ever be perfect, and there’s always going to be room for improvement. I would have loved to see a beefier processor, faster charging for the battery, a better loudspeaker, and even a telephoto camera. But these devices have to exist within their own realities and to that extent, the Galaxy A51 is quite possibly one of the best smartphones in its category.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.01.2020
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 might be affordable (It’ll retail for £329 in the UK) but it still packs enough ‘flagship’ features to make it seem like a great buy. As long as you don’t mind a phone that feels very plasticky, that is.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.01.2020
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 might be affordable (It’ll retail for £329 in the UK) but it still packs enough ‘flagship’ features to make it seem like a great buy. As long as you don’t mind a phone that feels very plasticky, that is.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.01.2020
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 appears to get the mix right when it comes to features vs price point, and it's a smartphone you should definitely keep an eye on this year as it could be an affordable handset champion.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.01.2020
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 appears to get the mix right when it comes to features vs price point, and it's a smartphone you should definitely keep an eye on this year as it could be an affordable handset champion.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.01.2020
Quelle: Profesional Review ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Profesional Review ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Andro 4 All ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Andro 4 All ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Newesc ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Newesc ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Newesc ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Newesc ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Hipertextual ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Hipertextual ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Hipertextual ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Hipertextual ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Zona Movilidad ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; modern design; solid workmanship; nice display; good cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 02.04.2020
Quelle: Zona Movilidad ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; modern design; solid workmanship; nice display; good cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 02.04.2020
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great display; good cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.02.2020
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great display; good cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.02.2020
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: El Androide Libre ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; nice display; good price. Negative: Average performance; poor cameras in low light condition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.02.2020
Quelle: El Androide Libre ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; nice display; good price. Negative: Average performance; poor cameras in low light condition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.02.2020
Quelle: Showmetech.com.br PT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 89% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 92% Mobilität: 95% Gehäuse: 95%
Quelle: Showmetech.com.br PT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 89% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 92% Mobilität: 95% Gehäuse: 95%
Quelle: PC Guia PT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 70%
Quelle: PC Guia PT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 70%
Quelle: Gizmodo Brasil PT→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras. Negative: Poor cameras in low light condition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.08.2020
Quelle: Gizmodo Brasil PT→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras. Negative: Poor cameras in low light condition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.08.2020
Quelle: Android Geek PT→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; solid workmanship; excellent AMOLED screen. Negative: Many bloatwares; limited macro lens usage.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.01.2020
Quelle: Android Geek PT→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; solid workmanship; excellent AMOLED screen. Negative: Many bloatwares; limited macro lens usage.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.01.2020
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65% Preis: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 68% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65% Preis: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 68% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 65% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 65% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Preis: 64% Ausstattung: 84%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Preis: 64% Ausstattung: 84%
Quelle: Techzine NL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Techzine NL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Computer Totaal NL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Computer Totaal NL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Diskidee.nl NL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; great cameras; nice display. Negative: Average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.12.2019
Quelle: Diskidee.nl NL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; great cameras; nice display. Negative: Average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.12.2019
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Journal du Geek FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Journal du Geek FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice display; high performance; good connectivity; long battery life. Negative: Relatively high price; no LED notification.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.02.2020
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice display; high performance; good connectivity; long battery life. Negative: Relatively high price; no LED notification.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.02.2020
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good processor; AMOLED display; decent autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.01.2020
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good processor; AMOLED display; decent autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.01.2020
Quelle: 90 Sekund PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.08.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: 90 Sekund PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.08.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Leistung: 55% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Leistung: 55% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Antyweb PL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; high performance; super AMOLED display; excellent selfie camera. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.02.2020
Quelle: Antyweb PL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; high performance; super AMOLED display; excellent selfie camera. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.02.2020
Quelle: Chip Online TR TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Chip Online TR TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: HWP.com.tr TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: HWP.com.tr TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: Teknolojioku TR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; good hardware; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 18.03.2020
Quelle: Teknolojioku TR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; good hardware; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 18.03.2020
Quelle: Helpix RU→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Helpix RU→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail RU→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.12.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 69% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail RU→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.12.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 69% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: i2Hard RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; great display; NFC. Negative: Average performance; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.04.2020
Quelle: i2Hard RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; great display; NFC. Negative: Average performance; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.04.2020
Quelle: Hitech Vesti RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; bright display; nice cameras; large battery capacity; NFC chip. Negative: Plastic case; low performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.03.2020
Quelle: Hitech Vesti RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; bright display; nice cameras; large battery capacity; NFC chip. Negative: Plastic case; low performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.03.2020
Quelle: Mega Obzor RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; great built quality; impressive cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.01.2020
Quelle: Mega Obzor RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; great built quality; impressive cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.01.2020
Quelle: DGL.ru RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display. Negative: Short battery life; slow charging; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.01.2020
Quelle: DGL.ru RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display. Negative: Short battery life; slow charging; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.01.2020
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 83% Ausstattung: 81% Mobilität: 84% Gehäuse: 86%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 83% Ausstattung: 81% Mobilität: 84% Gehäuse: 86%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 83% Ausstattung: 81% Mobilität: 84% Gehäuse: 86%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 83% Ausstattung: 81% Mobilität: 84% Gehäuse: 86%
Quelle: CNews.cz CZ→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.01.2020
Quelle: CNews.cz CZ→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.01.2020
Quelle: Techtimes.vn VN→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91% Leistung: 89% Bildschirm: 93% Mobilität: 88% Gehäuse: 92%
Quelle: Techtimes.vn VN→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91% Leistung: 89% Bildschirm: 93% Mobilität: 88% Gehäuse: 92%
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great cameras; decent hardware; nice performance.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.08.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great cameras; decent hardware; nice performance.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.08.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; impressive cameras; nice display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.08.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; impressive cameras; nice display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.08.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; excellent macro cameras; premium design; big screen; quick charging.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.08.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; excellent macro cameras; premium design; big screen; quick charging.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.08.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent cameras; modern design; high performance; large storage; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.07.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent cameras; modern design; high performance; large storage; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.07.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; premium design; solid workmanship; excellent cameras; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.06.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; premium design; solid workmanship; excellent cameras; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.06.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; premium design; great built quality; nice cameras; decent hardware; high performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 31.03.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; premium design; great built quality; nice cameras; decent hardware; high performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 31.03.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; impressive macro cameras; modern design; big screen; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.03.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; impressive macro cameras; modern design; big screen; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.03.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; suitable for girls; nice display; good hardware; high performance.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.03.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; good price; impressive macro cameras; suitable for girls.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.03.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; suitable for girls; nice display; good hardware; high performance.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.03.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; good price; impressive macro cameras; suitable for girls.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.03.2020
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; suitable for girls.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.03.2020
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; suitable for girls.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.03.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive macro cameras; infinity-O display; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.03.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive macro cameras; infinity-O display; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.03.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; beautiful design; light weight; nice display; impressive macro cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.02.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; beautiful design; light weight; nice display; impressive macro cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent quad cameras; big screen; large battery capacity; quick charging; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive macro cameras; good price; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent quad cameras; big screen; large battery capacity; quick charging; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive macro cameras; good price; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; large battery capacity; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; large battery capacity; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; good price; nice cameras; decent display; compact size; light weight.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.02.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; good price; nice cameras; decent display; compact size; light weight.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.02.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; good price; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.01.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; good price; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; nice quad cameras; nice display; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; nice quad cameras; nice display; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice quad cameras; infinity display; modern design; compact size; light weight; high autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice quad cameras; infinity display; modern design; compact size; light weight; high autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful display; nice quad cameras; elegant design; compact size; light weight; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent quad cameras; great display; fast fingerprint sensor; high autonomy; fast charging; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful display; nice quad cameras; elegant design; compact size; light weight; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent quad cameras; great display; fast fingerprint sensor; high autonomy; fast charging; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice quad cameras; great display; elegant design; slim size; light weight; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice quad cameras; great display; elegant design; slim size; light weight; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; modern design; impressive cameras; excellent display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; modern design; impressive cameras; excellent display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.01.2020
Quelle: VNReview VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; elegant design; solid workmanship; nice display; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.12.2019
Quelle: VNReview VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; elegant design; solid workmanship; nice display; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.12.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; nice performance. Negative: Same other flagships' design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.12.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; nice performance. Negative: Same other flagships' design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.12.2019
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; beautiful design; big screen; nice display; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.12.2019
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; beautiful design; big screen; nice display; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; decent hardware; nice performance; modern design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.12.2019
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive macro cameras; beautiful display; nice performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; decent hardware; nice performance; modern design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.12.2019
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive macro cameras; beautiful display; nice performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.12.2019
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; good price; nice performance; great cameras; decent autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.12.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great quad cameras; good price. Negative: Plastic case; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.12.2019
Quelle: Tinh Te VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; impressive cameras; infinity display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.12.2019
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; good price; nice performance; great cameras; decent autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.12.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great quad cameras; good price. Negative: Plastic case; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.12.2019
Quelle: Tinh Te VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; impressive cameras; infinity display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; beautiful design; infinity display; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; excellent cameras; powerful hardware; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.12.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; large battery capacity; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 21.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; beautiful design; infinity display; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; excellent cameras; powerful hardware; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.12.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; large battery capacity; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 21.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Infinity display; impressive cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.12.2019
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Infinity display; impressive cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Infinity display; impressive cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.12.2019
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Infinity display; impressive cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; great main camera; decent processor; long battery life; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; impressive cameras; excellent display; modern design; powerful hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; great main camera; decent processor; long battery life; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; impressive cameras; excellent display; modern design; powerful hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Great cameras; modern design; big screen; excellent display; high performance; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Great cameras; modern design; big screen; excellent display; high performance; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; attractive price; infinity display; thin frames.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.12.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; nice quad cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; attractive price; infinity display; thin frames.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.12.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; nice quad cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.12.2019
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; good price; excellent display; beautiful design; great built quality; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.12.2019
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; good price; excellent display; beautiful design; great built quality; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.12.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; modern design; great built quality; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.12.2019
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; attractive price; beautiful design; solid workmanship; slim size; infinity display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.12.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; modern design; great built quality; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.12.2019
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; attractive price; beautiful design; solid workmanship; slim size; infinity display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful display; nice quad cameras; quick charging; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.12.2019
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; good price; slim size; light weight; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.12.2019
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; good hardware; nice quad cameras; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful display; nice quad cameras; quick charging; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.12.2019
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; good price; slim size; light weight; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.12.2019
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; good hardware; nice quad cameras; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.12.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Frameless design; nice quad cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.12.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Frameless design; nice quad cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.12.2019
Quelle: Jagat Review ID→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; excellent AMOLED display; powerful hardware; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 31.01.2020
Quelle: Jagat Review ID→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; excellent AMOLED display; powerful hardware; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 31.01.2020
Quelle: Mobil DK DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 68% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 50%
Quelle: Mobil DK DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 68% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 50%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74%
Quelle: Playtech.ro →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great built quality; decent hardware; great performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.08.2020
Quelle: Playtech.ro →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great built quality; decent hardware; great performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.08.2020
Quelle: Arena IT →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; attractive price; great display; nice main camera. Negative: Weak processor; plastic case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.05.2020
Quelle: Arena IT →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; attractive price; great display; nice main camera. Negative: Weak processor; plastic case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.05.2020
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; top cameras; decent processor; large battery capacity; nice display. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.02.2020
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; top cameras; decent processor; large battery capacity; nice display. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.02.2020
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A51 5GProzessor: unknown
Grafikkarte: unknown
Bildschirm: 6.50 Zoll, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.187kg
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
With the Galaxy A51 5G, Samsung has pushed the price of a capable 5G phone into impressively affordable territory. However, it appears that affordability comes at the cost of imaging performance — to a degree. In the fiercely competitive mid-range segment, the A51 5G finds itself up against phones with superior cameras, and for a very modest increase in budget, there are options with substantially better imaging capabilities. However, buyers who are particularly attracted to Samsung’s approach or who want 5G speed on a strict budget will be able to wring acceptable photos out of the A51 5G. Heavy video shooters, on the other hand, should be wary of the autofocus issues our testers found. For stills shooters on a tight budget, the A51 5G may be worth a look.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.02.2021
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 quickly cemented its position as a phone that you can’t really go wrong with. It’s a great mid-range phone and with all of the improvements that the 5G variant brings, it has become even better. At this price, there’s no reason why you shouldn’t buy the Galaxy A51 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.07.2020
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 75% Bildschirm: 86% Mobilität: 79% Gehäuse: 69%
Quelle: Les Mobiles FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.01.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GProzessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 778G 5G
Grafikkarte: Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Bildschirm: 6.50 Zoll, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.189kg
Preis: 449 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Nach nur einem halben Jahr steht für eines von Samsungs beliebtesten Mittelklasse-Smartphones ein Update bereit: Das Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G ändert auf den ersten Blick nur die Leistung, aber im Test sehen wir genauer hin und decken weitere Unterschiede auf.
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es das gleiche schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse sowie recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.08.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es das gleiche schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse sowie recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.08.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es das gleiche schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse sowie recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es das gleiche schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse sowie recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es das gleiche schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse sowie recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es das gleiche schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse sowie recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es das gleiche schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse sowie recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es das gleiche schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse sowie recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es dasselbe schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse und recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es dasselbe schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse und recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Die Unterschiede zwischen beiden Generationen sind gering. Doch dank leicht besserer Kamera (vermutlich durch weiterentwickelter Bildverarbeitung), längeren Updates und 5G geht das Galaxy A53 als Sieger aus dem Vergleich hervor. Wer aber Wert auf Tempo legt, greift lieber zu einer anderen Alternative: Das Galaxy A52s hat einen weitaus schnelleren Prozessor als das A53. Vor der Kaufentscheidung empfiehlt sich auch ein Preisvergleich. Zum Testzeitpunkt gab es das Galaxy A53 ab 350 Euro, das Galaxy A52 ab 260 Euro und das Galaxy A52s ab 320 Euro (Stand: 21. April 2022).
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Die Unterschiede zwischen beiden Generationen sind gering. Doch dank leicht besserer Kamera (vermutlich durch weiterentwickelter Bildverarbeitung), längeren Updates und 5G geht das Galaxy A53 als Sieger aus dem Vergleich hervor. Wer aber Wert auf Tempo legt, greift lieber zu einer anderen Alternative: Das Galaxy A52s hat einen weitaus schnelleren Prozessor als das A53. Vor der Kaufentscheidung empfiehlt sich auch ein Preisvergleich. Zum Testzeitpunkt gab es das Galaxy A53 ab 350 Euro, das Galaxy A52 ab 260 Euro und das Galaxy A52s ab 320 Euro (Stand: 21. April 2022).
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es dasselbe schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse und recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.03.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es dasselbe schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse und recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.03.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G kann in unserem Test voll überzeugen. Der Hersteller hat an den richtigen Stellen kleine Verbesserungen zu den Vorgängern A52 und A52 5G erzielt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.01.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G kann in unserem Test voll überzeugen. Der Hersteller hat an den richtigen Stellen kleine Verbesserungen zu den Vorgängern A52 und A52 5G erzielt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.01.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verhilft Samsung seiner Mittelklasse endlich zu einem gescheiten Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Das erst fünf Monate alte A52 5G wird damit überflüssig. Doch warum bringt Samsung so schnell einen Nachfolger? Das A52 (5G) war im Sommer 2021 kaum lieferbar, angeblich musste Samsung daher Hals über Kopf einen Nachfolger mit anderen Chips auf den Markt bringen. Mittlerweile ist das Galaxy A52s gut verfügbar und teils bereits zu Preisen um die 400 Euro zu bekommen. Somit ist es nur noch rund 70 Euro teurer als das normale A52 – und wegen der schnelleren CPU damit auch für Käufer ohne 5G-Tarif eine gute Wahl.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.01.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verhilft Samsung seiner Mittelklasse endlich zu einem gescheiten Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Das erst fünf Monate alte A52 5G wird damit überflüssig. Doch warum bringt Samsung so schnell einen Nachfolger? Das A52 (5G) war im Sommer 2021 kaum lieferbar, angeblich musste Samsung daher Hals über Kopf einen Nachfolger mit anderen Chips auf den Markt bringen. Mittlerweile ist das Galaxy A52s gut verfügbar und teils bereits zu Preisen um die 400 Euro zu bekommen. Somit ist es nur noch rund 70 Euro teurer als das normale A52 – und wegen der schnelleren CPU damit auch für Käufer ohne 5G-Tarif eine gute Wahl.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.01.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verhilft Samsung seiner Mittelklasse endlich zu einem gescheiten Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Das erst fünf Monate alte A52 5G wird damit überflüssig. Doch warum bringt Samsung so schnell einen Nachfolger? Das A52 (5G) war im Sommer 2021 kaum lieferbar, angeblich musste Samsung daher Hals über Kopf einen Nachfolger mit anderen Chips auf den Markt bringen. Mittlerweile ist das Galaxy A52s gut verfügbar und teils bereits zu Preisen um die 400 Euro zu bekommen. Somit ist es nur noch rund 70 Euro teurer als das normale A52 – und wegen der schnelleren CPU damit auch für Käufer ohne 5G-Tarif eine gute Wahl.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verhilft Samsung seiner Mittelklasse endlich zu einem gescheiten Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Das erst fünf Monate alte A52 5G wird damit überflüssig. Doch warum bringt Samsung so schnell einen Nachfolger? Das A52 (5G) war im Sommer 2021 kaum lieferbar, angeblich musste Samsung daher Hals über Kopf einen Nachfolger mit anderen Chips auf den Markt bringen. Mittlerweile ist das Galaxy A52s gut verfügbar und teils bereits zu Preisen um die 400 Euro zu bekommen. Somit ist es nur noch rund 70 Euro teurer als das normale A52 – und wegen der schnelleren CPU damit auch für Käufer ohne 5G-Tarif eine gute Wahl.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verhilft Samsung seiner Mittelklasse endlich zu einem gescheiten Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Das erst fünf Monate alte A52 5G wird damit überflüssig. Doch warum bringt Samsung so schnell einen Nachfolger? Das A52 (5G) war im Sommer 2021 kaum lieferbar, angeblich musste Samsung daher Hals über Kopf einen Nachfolger mit anderen Chips auf den Markt bringen. Mittlerweile ist das Galaxy A52s gut verfügbar und teils bereits zu Preisen um die 400 Euro zu bekommen. Somit ist es nur noch rund 70 Euro teurer als das normale A52 – und wegen der schnelleren CPU damit auch für Käufer ohne 5G-Tarif eine gute Wahl.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verhilft Samsung seiner Mittelklasse endlich zu einem gescheiten Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Das erst fünf Monate alte A52 5G wird damit überflüssig. Doch warum bringt Samsung so schnell einen Nachfolger? Das A52 (5G) war im Sommer 2021 kaum lieferbar, angeblich musste Samsung daher Hals über Kopf einen Nachfolger mit anderen Chips auf den Markt bringen. Mittlerweile ist das Galaxy A52s gut verfügbar und teils bereits zu Preisen um die 400 Euro zu bekommen. Somit ist es nur noch rund 70 Euro teurer als das normale A52 – und wegen der schnelleren CPU damit auch für Käufer ohne 5G-Tarif eine gute Wahl.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Curved
Insgesamt bietet das Samsung Galaxy A52s ein paar gute Argumente. Es schießt für die Mittelklasse gute Fotos. Ihr seid durch 5G-Fähigkeit zukunftssicher.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Preis: 77% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Curved
Insgesamt bietet das Samsung Galaxy A52s ein paar gute Argumente. Es schießt für die Mittelklasse gute Fotos. Ihr seid durch 5G-Fähigkeit zukunftssicher.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Preis: 77% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es dasselbe schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse und recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es dasselbe schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse und recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es dasselbe schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse und recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist auch das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.09.2021
Quelle: Computerbild
Mit dem Galaxy A52s 5G verfeinert Samsung das Angebot in der Mittelklasse, bietet endlich einen Prozessor mit gescheitem Arbeitstempo – passend zum schnellen 5G. Apps starten deutlich schneller als beim normalen A52. Ansonsten bietet es dasselbe schön matte Kunststoffgehäuse und recht ordentliche Kameras – inklusive optischer Bildstabilisierung, aber ohne Tele. Wichtig für den Alltag: Wie das A52 ist auch das A52s wasserdicht nach IP67. Eine Klinkenbuchse ist weiter an Bord. Ein Netzteil wird mitgeliefert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.09.2021
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s isn’t an exceptional phone, but it sure is a reliable one. You could fault the lack of a flagship-grade chipset, faster charging, or even better cameras, but that’s not what the phone is trying to achieve. Gamers and photographers have alternative options. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a no-fuss phone that gets all the essentials right, and the performance upgrade keeps things moving along at a steadier clip than the Galaxy A52 5G. If you can find a model without the bloatware, you’re left with a well-supported phone that is an easy recommendation as a daily driver, but only if you’re not looking for the latest mid-ranger from Samsung. If you don’t want to spend the extra cash to get Samsung’s latest mid-ranger, the Galaxy A53 5G, the Galaxy A52s is still a great choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.09.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s isn’t an exceptional phone, but it sure is a reliable one. You could fault the lack of a flagship-grade chipset, faster charging, or even better cameras, but that’s not what the phone is trying to achieve. Gamers and photographers have alternative options. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a no-fuss phone that gets all the essentials right, and the performance upgrade keeps things moving along at a steadier clip than the Galaxy A52 5G. If you can find a model without the bloatware, you’re left with a well-supported phone that is an easy recommendation as a daily driver, but only if you’re not looking for the latest mid-ranger from Samsung. If you don’t want to spend the extra cash to get Samsung’s latest mid-ranger, the Galaxy A53 5G, the Galaxy A52s is still a great choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.09.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
As it is, there are competitors that feel faster and smoother, so in the end it's up to you whether you value that above all of the A52s' traits that those competitors can't match: the extended software support, the screen quality, OIS on the main camera, the ultrawide image quality, the IP67 water and dust resistance, and even the brand name on the back, as some people don't want to stray from the Apple-Samsung duopoly.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.06.2022
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
As it is, there are competitors that feel faster and smoother, so in the end it's up to you whether you value that above all of the A52s' traits that those competitors can't match: the extended software support, the screen quality, OIS on the main camera, the ultrawide image quality, the IP67 water and dust resistance, and even the brand name on the back, as some people don't want to stray from the Apple-Samsung duopoly.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.06.2022
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has all the hallmarks of an excellent affordable smartphone. What it lacks in premium trimmings like a top-tier processor and fast charging, it makes up for with a high-end build, excellent display, long-lasting battery life, and long-term software support. A modest upgrade over the already great Galaxy A52 5G, the Galaxy A52s is a very easy phone to recommend, even with the Galaxy A53 5G technically replacing it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has all the hallmarks of an excellent affordable smartphone. What it lacks in premium trimmings like a top-tier processor and fast charging, it makes up for with a high-end build, excellent display, long-lasting battery life, and long-term software support. A modest upgrade over the already great Galaxy A52 5G, the Galaxy A52s is a very easy phone to recommend, even with the Galaxy A53 5G technically replacing it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has all the hallmarks of an excellent affordable smartphone. What it lacks in premium trimmings like a top-tier processor and fast charging, it makes up for with a high-end build, excellent display, long-lasting battery life, and long-term software support. A modest upgrade over the already great Galaxy A52 5G, the Galaxy A52s is a very easy phone to recommend, although we think the newer Galaxy A53 is the better buy for those willing to spend a bit more.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has all the hallmarks of an excellent affordable smartphone. What it lacks in premium trimmings like a top-tier processor and fast charging, it makes up for with a high-end build, excellent display, long-lasting battery life, and long-term software support. A modest upgrade over the already great Galaxy A52 5G, the Galaxy A52s is a very easy phone to recommend, although we think the newer Galaxy A53 is the better buy for those willing to spend a bit more.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.05.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
There is no question that the Samsung A52s is better value than the older A52. It still retains the same dazzling screen, decent rear camera and user-friendly UI – but it bumps up the performance to truly compete with other mid-range models. The build quality is not the flashiest out there, and the 15W charger included in the box means it can't match some rivals which charge much quicker. Plus, there's no noticeable improvement in the battery life from the A52. However, this is still a decent mid-range offering from Samsung – especially if you can get it for a much cheaper price now that the new A53 has hit shelves.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
There is no question that the Samsung A52s is better value than the older A52. It still retains the same dazzling screen, decent rear camera and user-friendly UI – but it bumps up the performance to truly compete with other mid-range models. The build quality is not the flashiest out there, and the 15W charger included in the box means it can't match some rivals which charge much quicker. Plus, there's no noticeable improvement in the battery life from the A52. However, this is still a decent mid-range offering from Samsung – especially if you can get it for a much cheaper price now that the new A53 has hit shelves.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.04.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Manila Shaker
This is the upgrade of the Galaxy A52 that was released earlier this year. it comes with the same design but this time it is 5G ready, a faster chipset, and a few upgrades under its hood. Today we will put to test its 64mp quad camera and see if it performs accordingly to its price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.12.2021
Quelle: Manila Shaker
This is the upgrade of the Galaxy A52 that was released earlier this year. it comes with the same design but this time it is 5G ready, a faster chipset, and a few upgrades under its hood. Today we will put to test its 64mp quad camera and see if it performs accordingly to its price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.12.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G tied with its older sibling, the A52 5G, in nearly all categories, with both devices earning the same overall score. The one category in which the two phones produced noticeably different results was Video. As illustrated in the top left screen grab below, the A52s 5G’s rendering is strikingly brighter than the A52 5G’s (top right). But if you compare the rendering of the t-shirt worn by the man on the left, you can see that the A52s 5G shows fewer details in the midtones than the A52 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 08.12.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G tied with its older sibling, the A52 5G, in nearly all categories, with both devices earning the same overall score. The one category in which the two phones produced noticeably different results was Video. As illustrated in the top left screen grab below, the A52s 5G’s rendering is strikingly brighter than the A52 5G’s (top right). But if you compare the rendering of the t-shirt worn by the man on the left, you can see that the A52s 5G shows fewer details in the midtones than the A52 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 08.12.2021
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
With our time spent crafting this Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G review, there’s no doubt in our minds that it’s a good phone with a lot to offer. It has a great screen with fantastic speakers for those who tend to watch more videos on their smartphone, a capable processor, it takes great photos, and the battery life is sufficient despite being lower than the 5000mAh norm. But, price to performance is definitely going to be the biggest hang-up for this phone since we have seen other offerings with stronger processors and bigger megapixel counts at its price point. If you’ve been loyal to the brand though and don’t want to spend the money for their S series phones, this device is an easy one to recommend.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.12.2021
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
With our time spent crafting this Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G review, there’s no doubt in our minds that it’s a good phone with a lot to offer. It has a great screen with fantastic speakers for those who tend to watch more videos on their smartphone, a capable processor, it takes great photos, and the battery life is sufficient despite being lower than the 5000mAh norm. But, price to performance is definitely going to be the biggest hang-up for this phone since we have seen other offerings with stronger processors and bigger megapixel counts at its price point. If you’ve been loyal to the brand though and don’t want to spend the money for their S series phones, this device is an easy one to recommend.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.12.2021
Quelle: Htxt Africa EN→DE
At R8 999 (RRP) the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is not on the cheaper side of mid-range phones. It only takes a couple of hours with the device though to see that is a cut above most of the mid-range options out there at the moment. Added to this is the fact that it has expert build quality, deliver great visuals from its display and captures superb images with its camera system, all while sipping battery throughout the day. The only issue was a lack of cover in the box and the fact that you’re limited to the Black colour option at this stage. Other than that, if you are savvy, the Galaxy A52s 5G should be your first option to consider if you want flagship performance at a more affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE
From our experience, the Galaxy A52s 5G should work like a charm for most consumers, especially casual ones. It performs well in many areas, but perhaps the biggest win is its 4-year software update guarantee, which is pretty long compared with other brands. Moreover, the Galaxy A52s 5G offers better and faster performance Galaxy A52 5G. Since both phones are sold for RM1899, we would certainly recommend the Galaxy A52s 5G because of the Snapdragon 778G chipset. But if you're a bit tight on budget, you could consider the OPPO Reno6 Z (RM1699), Xiaomi 11T (RM1699), or the realme GT Neo2 (RM1999). The Reno6 Z offers a more captivating design, while the other two phones have faster chipsets.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.11.2021
Quelle: Htxt Africa EN→DE
At R8 999 (RRP) the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is not on the cheaper side of mid-range phones. It only takes a couple of hours with the device though to see that is a cut above most of the mid-range options out there at the moment. Added to this is the fact that it has expert build quality, deliver great visuals from its display and captures superb images with its camera system, all while sipping battery throughout the day. The only issue was a lack of cover in the box and the fact that you’re limited to the Black colour option at this stage. Other than that, if you are savvy, the Galaxy A52s 5G should be your first option to consider if you want flagship performance at a more affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE
From our experience, the Galaxy A52s 5G should work like a charm for most consumers, especially casual ones. It performs well in many areas, but perhaps the biggest win is its 4-year software update guarantee, which is pretty long compared with other brands. Moreover, the Galaxy A52s 5G offers better and faster performance Galaxy A52 5G. Since both phones are sold for RM1899, we would certainly recommend the Galaxy A52s 5G because of the Snapdragon 778G chipset. But if you're a bit tight on budget, you could consider the OPPO Reno6 Z (RM1699), Xiaomi 11T (RM1699), or the realme GT Neo2 (RM1999). The Reno6 Z offers a more captivating design, while the other two phones have faster chipsets.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.11.2021
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
Overall, In comparison to the lower versions, this has a great package that Samsung fans will love, but we’re still skeptical about its build and durability. However, Samsung has a large service center network across the country, so it may still be acceptable for some. Samsung retains its value for money feature on their Galaxy A52s 5G. The performance is excellent for the price. They never disappoint us with their camera performance because their ecosystem’s HDR and image processing are clearer and more balanced. The design is the added value, and it costs P22,990 for the 8GB + 128GB variant, while the higher storage costs P24,990. It is suitable for anyone looking for a high-quality phone at a reasonable price. It’s a fantastic smartphone and a great value for money that Samsung fans will adore.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.11.2021
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
Overall, In comparison to the lower versions, this has a great package that Samsung fans will love, but we’re still skeptical about its build and durability. However, Samsung has a large service center network across the country, so it may still be acceptable for some. Samsung retains its value for money feature on their Galaxy A52s 5G. The performance is excellent for the price. They never disappoint us with their camera performance because their ecosystem’s HDR and image processing are clearer and more balanced. The design is the added value, and it costs P22,990 for the 8GB + 128GB variant, while the higher storage costs P24,990. It is suitable for anyone looking for a high-quality phone at a reasonable price. It’s a fantastic smartphone and a great value for money that Samsung fans will adore.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.11.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G, released in August 2021, is an update to the Galaxy A52 5G released earlier in the year, and is part of the lower-priced A line of devices that provide alternatives to the brand’s more expensive flagships. With the two devices sharing the same audio specs, one would expect the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G test results and scores to be identical to those of the A52 5G. We have confirmed this by putting the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G through the DXOMARK Audio test suite.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 17.11.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G, released in August 2021, is an update to the Galaxy A52 5G released earlier in the year, and is part of the lower-priced A line of devices that provide alternatives to the brand’s more expensive flagships. With the two devices sharing the same audio specs, one would expect the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G test results and scores to be identical to those of the A52 5G. We have confirmed this by putting the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G through the DXOMARK Audio test suite.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 17.11.2021
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
So, finally the Samsung Galaxy A52s’s pricing. We only have one configuration here in Malaysia – and it’s the 8GB RAM + 256GB storage version and it is priced at RM1,899. I think this price is quite hefty and Samsung should’ve brought in the 6GB RAM + 128GB storage if there is one, and price it somewhere like RM1599 or something. That would be fantastic. The Galaxy S20 FE 4G is currently only priced at RM1,999 but comes with the Snapdragon 865 chipset with 8GB RAM and 128GB storage. I mean, the only disadvantage of getting the Galaxy S20 FE is because of its age. Since the Galaxy S20 FE is already a year old, buying it now only means there are 2 more versions of Android upgrades and 3 years of security patches left. So, it depends on what you want. I honestly can’t pick between the Galaxy A52s and the Galaxy A72. I love having a usable telephoto camera instead of a depth sensor on my phone, but the Galaxy A52s does offer much more performance than the Galaxy A72.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.10.2021
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
So, finally the Samsung Galaxy A52s’s pricing. We only have one configuration here in Malaysia – and it’s the 8GB RAM + 256GB storage version and it is priced at RM1,899. I think this price is quite hefty and Samsung should’ve brought in the 6GB RAM + 128GB storage if there is one, and price it somewhere like RM1599 or something. That would be fantastic. The Galaxy S20 FE 4G is currently only priced at RM1,999 but comes with the Snapdragon 865 chipset with 8GB RAM and 128GB storage. I mean, the only disadvantage of getting the Galaxy S20 FE is because of its age. Since the Galaxy S20 FE is already a year old, buying it now only means there are 2 more versions of Android upgrades and 3 years of security patches left. So, it depends on what you want. I honestly can’t pick between the Galaxy A52s and the Galaxy A72. I love having a usable telephoto camera instead of a depth sensor on my phone, but the Galaxy A52s does offer much more performance than the Galaxy A72.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.10.2021
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
Overall, as I mentioned at the start of this review, Samsung is asking a bit of a premium price for the Galaxy A52s 5G than what the phone actually delivers. But this doesn’t come as a surprise since Samsung has always done that with its A-series… having you pay a bit more than the competition. All in all, if you want the absolute best value-for-money smartphone, the Galaxy A52s isn’t the best option. I think Samsung’s own Galaxy M52 that was launched recently is cheaper than the A52s and offers a very similar experience. But again, if your priorities are superior cameras, a better-looking design, a water-resistant phone, it is worth paying extra for the A52s. Also, the phone is priced amazingly here in Nepal compared to markets like India and the UK. I even think Galaxy A52s costs the cheapest here—making it a great value proposition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Preis: 85% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
Overall, as I mentioned at the start of this review, Samsung is asking a bit of a premium price for the Galaxy A52s 5G than what the phone actually delivers. But this doesn’t come as a surprise since Samsung has always done that with its A-series… having you pay a bit more than the competition. All in all, if you want the absolute best value-for-money smartphone, the Galaxy A52s isn’t the best option. I think Samsung’s own Galaxy M52 that was launched recently is cheaper than the A52s and offers a very similar experience. But again, if your priorities are superior cameras, a better-looking design, a water-resistant phone, it is worth paying extra for the A52s. Also, the phone is priced amazingly here in Nepal compared to markets like India and the UK. I even think Galaxy A52s costs the cheapest here—making it a great value proposition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Preis: 85% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a worthy upgrade if you are a fan of the brand or are looking for a premium smartphone with an IP rating in the sub-Rs. 40,000 segment. However, when it comes to value, the Galaxy A52s' high price sees it getting sandwiched by phones that cost far less or offer superior features and performance. Motorola's Edge 20 is based on the same processor but also has a 108MP camera, 144Hz refresh rate display, and a super slim body, all at a lower price (Rs. 29,999), while the Realme GT (Review) offers a Snapdragon 888 processor along with much better low-light camera performance at a similar price (Rs. 37,999). For a few thousand Rupees more, Xiaomi's Mi 11X Pro (Review) (from Rs. 39,999) has a bigger display, a 108MP primary camera, and HDR10+ video streaming support, but not an IP rating.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 line, in our opinion, has successfully managed to hit the "sweet spot" within Samsung's strong and compelling current Galaxy A lineup. The newest A52s 5G refresh has flawlessly executed a chipset upgrade, only bringing more value to the table. The Snapdragon 778G is not only all-around faster than the Snapdragon 750G it replaces, but it also brings along some nifty connectivity upgrades, namely Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2. Most importantly, though, it does so without harming or downgrading the other aspects of the Galaxy A52 and without really increasing its price tag either. If you are after a great value-proposition from Samsung in 2021, or alternatively, really need an IP67 ingress protection rating for under EUR 450 at current pricing, then look no further than the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G. Or, perhaps the A52, if you can find a good deal and can live with the trade-offs. It's also important to note Samsung's promise of extended software support on the Galaxy A line as an extra value add. You can expect 3 major OS updates, as well as 4 years of security patches.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a worthy upgrade if you are a fan of the brand or are looking for a premium smartphone with an IP rating in the sub-Rs. 40,000 segment. However, when it comes to value, the Galaxy A52s' high price sees it getting sandwiched by phones that cost far less or offer superior features and performance. Motorola's Edge 20 is based on the same processor but also has a 108MP camera, 144Hz refresh rate display, and a super slim body, all at a lower price (Rs. 29,999), while the Realme GT (Review) offers a Snapdragon 888 processor along with much better low-light camera performance at a similar price (Rs. 37,999). For a few thousand Rupees more, Xiaomi's Mi 11X Pro (Review) (from Rs. 39,999) has a bigger display, a 108MP primary camera, and HDR10+ video streaming support, but not an IP rating.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
The Galaxy A52 line, in our opinion, has successfully managed to hit the "sweet spot" within Samsung's strong and compelling current Galaxy A lineup. The newest A52s 5G refresh has flawlessly executed a chipset upgrade, only bringing more value to the table. The Snapdragon 778G is not only all-around faster than the Snapdragon 750G it replaces, but it also brings along some nifty connectivity upgrades, namely Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2. Most importantly, though, it does so without harming or downgrading the other aspects of the Galaxy A52 and without really increasing its price tag either. If you are after a great value-proposition from Samsung in 2021, or alternatively, really need an IP67 ingress protection rating for under EUR 450 at current pricing, then look no further than the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G. Or, perhaps the A52, if you can find a good deal and can live with the trade-offs. It's also important to note Samsung's promise of extended software support on the Galaxy A line as an extra value add. You can expect 3 major OS updates, as well as 4 years of security patches.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: Cashify EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is another mid-range device from Samsung that is being marketed as a 5G device, which is still not being rolled out in Inida. The phone offers solid camera performance, a faster processor, smooth and vibrant in-display good software, and above-average battery life. The device looks good on paper, has decent performance but the price of Rs. 35,999 is something is on the higher side and we have a lot of devices that offer better specs at about 20% less price than this. If you are a die hard Samsung fan only then you should get this device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.09.2021
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
While many will argue on the fact that other smartphones are offering more than the Galaxy A52s 5G, but looking closely, you’ll find that’s not entirely true. The Galaxy A52s 5G is basically the flagship of mid-range smartphones. It is always important to have a good balance between price and features and performance and features. What we mean is that merely offering features on paper or offering best-in-class internals does not guarantee the best possible performance. What matters most is that the features that are actually useful and work when needed. And, that’s where the Galaxy A52s 5G comes-in. It has got everything to qualify it as a good mid-range phone while knocking on the door for a flagship smartphone with its 120Hz display, IP67 water and dust resistance rating and more. So, if you are out there looking for a smartphone that’s an all-rounder and offers a complete package and a good balance between price, features and performance, then it’s among the best you’ve got.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s isn’t an exceptional phone, but it sure is a reliable one. You could fault the lack of a flagship-grade chipset, faster charging, or even better cameras, but that’s not what the phone is trying to achieve. Gamers and photographers have alternative options. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a no-fuss phone that gets all the essentials right, and the performance upgrade keeps things moving along at a steadier clip than the Galaxy A52 5G. If you can find a model without the bloatware, you’re left with a well-supported phone that is an easy recommendation as a daily driver.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Cashify EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is another mid-range device from Samsung that is being marketed as a 5G device, which is still not being rolled out in Inida. The phone offers solid camera performance, a faster processor, smooth and vibrant in-display good software, and above-average battery life. The device looks good on paper, has decent performance but the price of Rs. 35,999 is something is on the higher side and we have a lot of devices that offer better specs at about 20% less price than this. If you are a die hard Samsung fan only then you should get this device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.09.2021
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
While many will argue on the fact that other smartphones are offering more than the Galaxy A52s 5G, but looking closely, you’ll find that’s not entirely true. The Galaxy A52s 5G is basically the flagship of mid-range smartphones. It is always important to have a good balance between price and features and performance and features. What we mean is that merely offering features on paper or offering best-in-class internals does not guarantee the best possible performance. What matters most is that the features that are actually useful and work when needed. And, that’s where the Galaxy A52s 5G comes-in. It has got everything to qualify it as a good mid-range phone while knocking on the door for a flagship smartphone with its 120Hz display, IP67 water and dust resistance rating and more. So, if you are out there looking for a smartphone that’s an all-rounder and offers a complete package and a good balance between price, features and performance, then it’s among the best you’ve got.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s isn’t an exceptional phone, but it sure is a reliable one. You could fault the lack of a flagship-grade chipset, faster charging, or even better cameras, but that’s not what the phone is trying to achieve. Gamers and photographers have alternative options. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a no-fuss phone that gets all the essentials right, and the performance upgrade keeps things moving along at a steadier clip than the Galaxy A52 5G. If you can find a model without the bloatware, you’re left with a well-supported phone that is an easy recommendation as a daily driver.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE
Priced Rs 35,999 onwards, the Galaxy A52s brings incremental but meaningful upgrades over the predecessor. The smartphone is geared for 5G experience, but it is only as good as the ongoing model till 5G becomes available in India. For now, the phone’s performance and display are the only upgrades differentiating the user experience. That said, consider the Galaxy A52s if you plan to jump on to the 5G bandwagon before the availability of the network. Otherwise, the Galaxy A52 still makes a better choice, simply because it is inexpensive and has more or less the same features.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 21.09.2021
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE
Priced Rs 35,999 onwards, the Galaxy A52s brings incremental but meaningful upgrades over the predecessor. The smartphone is geared for 5G experience, but it is only as good as the ongoing model till 5G becomes available in India. For now, the phone’s performance and display are the only upgrades differentiating the user experience. That said, consider the Galaxy A52s if you plan to jump on to the 5G bandwagon before the availability of the network. Otherwise, the Galaxy A52 still makes a better choice, simply because it is inexpensive and has more or less the same features.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 21.09.2021
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
The only thing that disappointed me about the A52s 5G is that Samsung didn’t switch out the macro camera at the rear for a telephoto lens. It’s the one feature that could have made the A52s a perfect mid-range phone, but I guess Samsung didn’t do it because it wants to continue selling the Galaxy A72 and also because it doesn’t want to encroach on the territory occupied by 2020’s Galaxy S20 FE. Still, if you’re in the market for a new 5G-enabled mid-range phone that performs like a flagship device without cutting too deep into your pockets, the Galaxy A52s 5G is a top-notch option you should seriously consider.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 15.09.2021
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
The only thing that disappointed me about the A52s 5G is that Samsung didn’t switch out the macro camera at the rear for a telephoto lens. It’s the one feature that could have made the A52s a perfect mid-range phone, but I guess Samsung didn’t do it because it wants to continue selling the Galaxy A72 and also because it doesn’t want to encroach on the territory occupied by 2020’s Galaxy S20 FE. Still, if you’re in the market for a new 5G-enabled mid-range phone that performs like a flagship device without cutting too deep into your pockets, the Galaxy A52s 5G is a top-notch option you should seriously consider.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 15.09.2021
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
I like the Galaxy A52s 5G and if you are using an old Samsung phone with weaker cameras and less superior battery, I think you can consider buying this device. I absolutely loved the display, the longer battery life, and the quality of the pictures. It’s a large phone, so be aware of that. There’s a lot to like about this phone. I think the true value of the Galaxy A52s lies in its ability to cram in a lot of premium features at a much lower price point. It’s not cheap, though.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
I like the Galaxy A52s 5G and if you are using an old Samsung phone with weaker cameras and less superior battery, I think you can consider buying this device. I absolutely loved the display, the longer battery life, and the quality of the pictures. It’s a large phone, so be aware of that. There’s a lot to like about this phone. I think the true value of the Galaxy A52s lies in its ability to cram in a lot of premium features at a much lower price point. It’s not cheap, though.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
If you prefer a device that provides amazing features with lots of customization support, then the Samsung Galaxy A52s smartphone is the best choice. You can also choose this option if you want to take pictures frequently and look for something in the mid-range flagship segment. Furthermore, the gaming experience and 5G performance are also decent. But there is always room for the alternative. So if you’re looking for an option, you can think of the OnePlus 9, which offers almost similar features to suit your needs.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.09.2021
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
If you prefer a device that provides amazing features with lots of customization support, then the Samsung Galaxy A52s smartphone is the best choice. You can also choose this option if you want to take pictures frequently and look for something in the mid-range flagship segment. Furthermore, the gaming experience and 5G performance are also decent. But there is always room for the alternative. So if you’re looking for an option, you can think of the OnePlus 9, which offers almost similar features to suit your needs.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.09.2021
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s costs Rs 35,999 for the 6GB RAM variant and Rs 37,499 for the 8GB RAM variant respectively. For the price, the handset brings a stylish design, capable cameras and reliable performance to the mix. The smartphone’s software experience is quite gratifying too, and that IP67 rating is still something most rivals can’t offer. However, it’s hard to turn a blind eye to competing devices like the Realme GT, the iQOO 7 Legend etc, which offer better performance, faster charging speeds and more premium designs. Don’t get me wrong, the Galaxy A52s is a serviceable daily driver, however, the brand should’ve priced it a tad more aggressively.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
Given its hardware, the Samsung Galaxy A52s seems like a solid contender that's placed between the higher end of the mid-range segment and the lower end of the premium segment. However, with the Realme GT (First Impressions) offering a top-of-the-line Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 processor, and several other compelling options such as the OnePlus 9R (Review) and Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro (Review) also priced under Rs. 40,000, Samsung still appears to be targeting those who prioritise design. So, a lot depends on how the Galaxy A52s's cameras perform and whether they match up to the quality you can get from competing low-cost premium devices. This is one of the things I will test in detail, so stay tuned for the full review of the Samsung Galaxy A52s, which should be out soon.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 08.09.2021
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A52s costs Rs 35,999 for the 6GB RAM variant and Rs 37,499 for the 8GB RAM variant respectively. For the price, the handset brings a stylish design, capable cameras and reliable performance to the mix. The smartphone’s software experience is quite gratifying too, and that IP67 rating is still something most rivals can’t offer. However, it’s hard to turn a blind eye to competing devices like the Realme GT, the iQOO 7 Legend etc, which offer better performance, faster charging speeds and more premium designs. Don’t get me wrong, the Galaxy A52s is a serviceable daily driver, however, the brand should’ve priced it a tad more aggressively.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
Given its hardware, the Samsung Galaxy A52s seems like a solid contender that's placed between the higher end of the mid-range segment and the lower end of the premium segment. However, with the Realme GT (First Impressions) offering a top-of-the-line Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 processor, and several other compelling options such as the OnePlus 9R (Review) and Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro (Review) also priced under Rs. 40,000, Samsung still appears to be targeting those who prioritise design. So, a lot depends on how the Galaxy A52s's cameras perform and whether they match up to the quality you can get from competing low-cost premium devices. This is one of the things I will test in detail, so stay tuned for the full review of the Samsung Galaxy A52s, which should be out soon.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 08.09.2021
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Ausstattung: 90% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Ausstattung: 90% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; long battery life. Negative: Slow charging; average cameras.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.11.2021
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; long battery life. Negative: Slow charging; average cameras.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.11.2021
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 50%
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 50%
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Great speakers; excellent AMOLED display; high gaming performance; great set of cameras. Negative: Short battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.01.2022
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Great speakers; excellent AMOLED display; high gaming performance; great set of cameras. Negative: Short battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.01.2022
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 48% Ausstattung: 78%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 48% Ausstattung: 78%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 83% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 86%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 83% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 86%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Leistung: 88% Mobilität: 84% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Leistung: 88% Mobilität: 84% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Les Mobiles FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Les Mobiles FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Journal du Geek FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Journal du Geek FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; excellent AMOLED display; great speakers; high performance; support 5G; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.11.2021
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; excellent AMOLED display; great speakers; high performance; support 5G; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.11.2021
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; support 5G; decent autonomy; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.08.2021
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; support 5G; decent autonomy; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.08.2021
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE
Positive: Attractive price; support 5G; powerful hardware; high performance; waterproof.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.12.2021
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE
Positive: Attractive price; support 5G; powerful hardware; high performance; waterproof.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.12.2021
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; great speakers; fast fingerprint sensor; powerful processor; nice main camera; excellent battery life. Negative: Mediocre design; poor selfie camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.04.2022
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Positive: Beautiful AMOLED display; headphone jack; microSD card slot; fast fingerprint sensor; powerful processor; nice main camera; long battery life. Negative: Mediocre design; average speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.04.2022
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; great speakers; fast fingerprint sensor; powerful processor; nice main camera; excellent battery life. Negative: Mediocre design; poor selfie camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.04.2022
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Positive: Beautiful AMOLED display; headphone jack; microSD card slot; fast fingerprint sensor; powerful processor; nice main camera; long battery life. Negative: Mediocre design; average speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.04.2022
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Positive: Nice display; headphone jack; microSD card slot; fast fingerprint sensor; powerful processor; decent main camera; long battery life. Negative: Mediocre design; average speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.01.2022
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Positive: Nice display; headphone jack; microSD card slot; fast fingerprint sensor; powerful processor; decent main camera; long battery life. Negative: Mediocre design; average speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.01.2022
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; microSD card slot; fast fingerprint sensor; powerful processor; good main camera; great battery life. Negative: Mediocre design; average speakers; poor side camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.12.2021
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; microSD card slot; fast fingerprint sensor; powerful processor; good main camera; great battery life. Negative: Mediocre design; average speakers; poor side camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.12.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; support 5G; great cameras; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.01.2022
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; support 5G; great cameras; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.01.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; support 5G; excellent quad cameras; decent gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.12.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; support 5G; excellent quad cameras; decent gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.12.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; high performance; great display; big screen; large battery capacity; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.12.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; high performance; great display; big screen; large battery capacity; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.12.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; excellent cameras; long battery life; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.12.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; excellent cameras; long battery life; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.12.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; solid workmanship; nice gaming performance; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.12.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; solid workmanship; nice gaming performance; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.12.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; high gaming performance; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.12.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; high gaming performance; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.12.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; support 5G; excellent cameras; long battery life; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.12.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; support 5G; excellent cameras; long battery life; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.12.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; modern design; excellent display; high performance; nice cameras; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.11.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; modern design; excellent display; high performance; nice cameras; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.11.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Good price; decent processor; high gaming performance; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.11.2021
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Good price; decent processor; high gaming performance; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.11.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: High performance; impressive cameras; excellent display; long battery life; decent hardware; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 28.10.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: High performance; impressive cameras; excellent display; long battery life; decent hardware; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 28.10.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high performance; excellent cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.10.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high performance; excellent cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.10.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high performance; excellent cameras; decent autonomy; quick charging; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.10.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high performance; excellent cameras; decent autonomy; quick charging; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.10.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Impressive cameras; high performance; beautiful display; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.10.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Impressive cameras; high performance; beautiful display; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.10.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: High performance; great cameras; large battery capacity; powerful processor; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.10.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: High performance; great cameras; large battery capacity; powerful processor; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.10.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Impressive cameras; big screen; nice display; decent processor; high gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.10.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Impressive cameras; big screen; nice display; decent processor; high gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.10.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; long battery life; nice cameras; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.10.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; long battery life; nice cameras; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.10.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; excellent display; powerful processor; support 5G; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.10.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; excellent display; powerful processor; support 5G; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.10.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; high performance; large battery capacity; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.10.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; high performance; large battery capacity; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.10.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Good price; modern design; big screen; nice display; decent hardware; high performance; great cameras; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.10.2021
Quelle: XT Mobile VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; nice cameras; powerful hardware; high gaming performance; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.10.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Good price; modern design; big screen; nice display; decent hardware; high performance; great cameras; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.10.2021
Quelle: XT Mobile VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; nice cameras; powerful hardware; high gaming performance; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.10.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; impressive processor; nice gaming performance; decent cameras; excellent display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.10.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; impressive processor; nice gaming performance; decent cameras; excellent display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.10.2021
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; 12GB RAM; excellent display; support 5G; high performance; big screen; decent cameras.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.10.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; big screen; long battery life; nice display; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.10.2021
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; 12GB RAM; excellent display; support 5G; high performance; big screen; decent cameras.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.10.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; big screen; long battery life; nice display; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.10.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; excellent quad cameras; great display; waterproof IP67; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.10.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; excellent quad cameras; great display; waterproof IP67; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.10.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; excellent cameras; high gaming performance; great display; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.10.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; excellent cameras; high gaming performance; great display; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.10.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: High performance; beautiful display; great cameras; decent autonomy; quick charging; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.10.2021
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: High performance; beautiful display; great cameras; decent autonomy; quick charging; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.10.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.09.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.09.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; support 5G; attractive price; decent autonomy; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.09.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; support 5G; attractive price; decent autonomy; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.09.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Waterproof IP67; nice display; high performance; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 24.09.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Waterproof IP67; nice display; high performance; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 24.09.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Decent processor; support 5G; nice display; great cameras; waterproof IP67; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.09.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Decent processor; support 5G; nice display; great cameras; waterproof IP67; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.09.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; nice display; good price; high performance; modern design; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.09.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; nice display; good price; high performance; modern design; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.09.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: High performance; support 5G; excellent display; nice cameras; waterproof IP67; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.09.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: High performance; support 5G; excellent display; nice cameras; waterproof IP67; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.09.2021
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high performance; support 5G; nice display; decent cameras; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.09.2021
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high performance; support 5G; nice display; decent cameras; waterproof IP67.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.09.2021
Quelle: Jagat Review ID→DE
Positive: Waterproof IP67; excellent display; support 5G; nice cameras; high performance; good cooling system; long battery life; slim size; light weight; headphone jack; stereo speakers; NFC chip. Negative: Slow charging; weak processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.09.2021
Quelle: Jagat Review ID→DE
Positive: Waterproof IP67; excellent display; support 5G; nice cameras; high performance; good cooling system; long battery life; slim size; light weight; headphone jack; stereo speakers; NFC chip. Negative: Slow charging; weak processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.09.2021
Quelle: Alt om Data DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 26.01.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 83% Leistung: 67%
Quelle: Alt om Data DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 26.01.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 83% Leistung: 67%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Arena IT →DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high performance; long battery life; nice display; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 29.12.2021
Quelle: Arena IT →DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high performance; long battery life; nice display; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 29.12.2021
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE
Positive: Beautiful design; powerful processor; fast storage; good cameras; attractive price. Negative: Short battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.11.2021
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE
Positive: Beautiful design; powerful processor; fast storage; good cameras; attractive price. Negative: Short battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.11.2021
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Samsung Galaxy A55 5GProzessor: Samsung Exynos Exynos 1480
Grafikkarte: Samsung Xclipse 530
Bildschirm: 6.60 Zoll, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.213kg
Preis: 529 Euro
Links: Samsung Notebooks Übersichtseite
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Das Galaxy A55 5G stellt in diesem Jahr die Speerspitze von Samsungs Mittelklasse dar. Es bietet einige Premium-Features, ein aufgefrischtes Design und wird lange mit Updates versorgt. Ganz günstig ist es aber nicht. Warum es sich dennoch lohnt, klärt unser Test.
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.10.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.10.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Chip (Print) - 8/24
Sehr helles OLED-Display, lange Akkulaufzeit, gute Ausstattung; nur langsames USB 2.0, kein Netzteil mitgeliefert, kein kabelloses Laden
Einzeltest, online nicht verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Leistung: 92% Ausstattung: 92% Bildschirm: 94% Mobilität: 91%
Quelle: Chip (Print) - 8/24
Sehr helles OLED-Display, lange Akkulaufzeit, gute Ausstattung; nur langsames USB 2.0, kein Netzteil mitgeliefert, kein kabelloses Laden
Einzeltest, online nicht verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Leistung: 92% Ausstattung: 92% Bildschirm: 94% Mobilität: 91%
Quelle: Inside Handy
Mit dem Galaxy A55 hat Samsung kleine, aber bedeutende Verbesserungen vorgenommen, die es von seinen Vorgängern abheben.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Inside Handy
Mit dem Galaxy A55 hat Samsung kleine, aber bedeutende Verbesserungen vorgenommen, die es von seinen Vorgängern abheben.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: PC Welt
Mit einer verbesserten Verarbeitungsqualität, einem größeren Display und einem schnelleren Prozessor ist das Galaxy A55 5G ein würdiger Nachfolger für das Galaxy A54 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: PC Welt
Mit einer verbesserten Verarbeitungsqualität, einem größeren Display und einem schnelleren Prozessor ist das Galaxy A55 5G ein würdiger Nachfolger für das Galaxy A54 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Allround-PC.com
Das Samsung Galaxy A55 bietet ein gelungenes Gesamtpaket, kann aber nicht in allen Disziplinen überzeugen. Besonders gut gefallen mir das hochwertige Design mit edlem Aluminiumrahmen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.04.2024
Quelle: Allround-PC.com
Das Samsung Galaxy A55 bietet ein gelungenes Gesamtpaket, kann aber nicht in allen Disziplinen überzeugen. Besonders gut gefallen mir das hochwertige Design mit edlem Aluminiumrahmen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.04.2024
Quelle: Tech Stage
Was soll man zum Galaxy A55 viel mehr sagen, als dass es sich bei diesem Smartphone um ein rundum absolut gelungenes Gesamtpaket mit tollen Features handelt?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Tech Stage
Was soll man zum Galaxy A55 viel mehr sagen, als dass es sich bei diesem Smartphone um ein rundum absolut gelungenes Gesamtpaket mit tollen Features handelt?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Chip.de
Das Samsung Galaxy A55 macht im Test eine gute Figur. Wie schon beim Vorgängermodell ist das OLED-Display ein Highlight. Es ist hell, zeigt einen großen Farbraum und ermöglicht geschmeidiges Scrollen dank der 120-Hertz-Bildwiederholrate.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 78% Leistung: 82% Ausstattung: 92% Bildschirm: 94% Mobilität: 91%
Quelle: Chip.de
Das Samsung Galaxy A55 macht im Test eine gute Figur. Wie schon beim Vorgängermodell ist das OLED-Display ein Highlight. Es ist hell, zeigt einen großen Farbraum und ermöglicht geschmeidiges Scrollen dank der 120-Hertz-Bildwiederholrate.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 78% Leistung: 82% Ausstattung: 92% Bildschirm: 94% Mobilität: 91%
Quelle: Tech Stage
Was soll man zum Galaxy A55 viel mehr sagen, als dass es sich bei diesem Smartphone um ein rundum absolut gelungenes Gesamtpaket mit tollen Features handelt?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Tech Stage
Was soll man zum Galaxy A55 viel mehr sagen, als dass es sich bei diesem Smartphone um ein rundum absolut gelungenes Gesamtpaket mit tollen Features handelt?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung Galaxy A55 5G ist ein gutes Mittelklasse-Smartphone mit klaren Schwächen geworden. Unsere Bewertung orientiert sich an einem gewünschten Zielpreis von 300-350€.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Techtest.org
Mit dem A55 hat Samsung ein wirklich gutes und “rundes” Smartphone im Sortiment. Dieses zeigte im Test keine echte Schwäche. Die Haptik und Verarbeitung ist tadellos.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Samsung Galaxy A55 5G ist ein gutes Mittelklasse-Smartphone mit klaren Schwächen geworden. Unsere Bewertung orientiert sich an einem gewünschten Zielpreis von 300-350€.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Techtest.org
Mit dem A55 hat Samsung ein wirklich gutes und “rundes” Smartphone im Sortiment. Dieses zeigte im Test keine echte Schwäche. Die Haptik und Verarbeitung ist tadellos.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Ähnlich wie Xiaomi mit der Redmi-Note-13-Familie (zum Vergleich) hat es sich Samsung mit seinen Smartphones der A-Serie in der Mittelklasse wirklich bequem gemacht.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Ähnlich wie Xiaomi mit der Redmi-Note-13-Familie (zum Vergleich) hat es sich Samsung mit seinen Smartphones der A-Serie in der Mittelklasse wirklich bequem gemacht.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Samsung hat beim Galaxy A55 wieder ein starkes Gesamtpaket geschnürt und die größte Schwäche des Vorgänger, die mäßige Performance, behoben.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Ausstattung: 90% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Netzwelt
Samsung hat beim Galaxy A55 wieder ein starkes Gesamtpaket geschnürt und die größte Schwäche des Vorgänger, die mäßige Performance, behoben.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Ausstattung: 90% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Computerbild
Das Galaxy A55 macht die A-Serie noch ein Stück besser: OLED-Display, Metallrahmen, ein sehr helles Display und ein ordentliches Prozessortempo machen das Mittelklasse-Modell stark. Und es ist wasserdicht. Im Vergleich zur S-Klasse fehlt es aber doch an Extras wie drahtlosem Laden, schmalen Displayrändern und genug Prozessorpower für KI-Anwendungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: A1 Blog
Das Galaxy A55 erfreut in vieler Hinsicht: Es ist schnell, sehr schick und verlässlich. Es bewältigt sämtliche an es gestellte Aufgaben des Alltags zuverlässig und fehlerlos.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.03.2024
Quelle: A1 Blog
Das Galaxy A55 erfreut in vieler Hinsicht: Es ist schnell, sehr schick und verlässlich. Es bewältigt sämtliche an es gestellte Aufgaben des Alltags zuverlässig und fehlerlos.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.03.2024
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Unterm Strich ist das Samsung Galaxy A55 ein moderates Update – aber mehr hat Samsung auch nicht nötig. Der Marktanteil der Galaxy-A-Serie in der Preisklasse bis 600 Euro liegt bei rund 50 Prozent.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.03.2024
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Unterm Strich ist das Samsung Galaxy A55 ein moderates Update – aber mehr hat Samsung auch nicht nötig. Der Marktanteil der Galaxy-A-Serie in der Preisklasse bis 600 Euro liegt bei rund 50 Prozent.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.03.2024
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Amateur Photographer EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 looks like a premium phone, but is significantly cheaper than the Samsung S series of phones, and even cheaper than Google’s last entry-level phone, the Google Pixel 8A. The A55 offers a great set of cameras, and gives the Pixel 8A a serious run for it’s money, with better results in some situations. If you can get the A55 for under £300, then this is a real bargain, although unfortunately, the phone isn’t currently available in the US. Samsung Galaxy A55. Red flower. Photo Joshua WallerFor those people who just want a great phone, but aren’t too worried about having a telephoto camera, or AI features, then the Samsung Galaxy A55 is a great option.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.09.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Amateur Photographer EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 looks like a premium phone, but is significantly cheaper than the Samsung S series of phones, and even cheaper than Google’s last entry-level phone, the Google Pixel 8A. The A55 offers a great set of cameras, and gives the Pixel 8A a serious run for it’s money, with better results in some situations. If you can get the A55 for under £300, then this is a real bargain, although unfortunately, the phone isn’t currently available in the US. Samsung Galaxy A55. Red flower. Photo Joshua WallerFor those people who just want a great phone, but aren’t too worried about having a telephoto camera, or AI features, then the Samsung Galaxy A55 is a great option.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.09.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Yugatech
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.08.2024
Quelle: Yugatech
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.08.2024
Quelle: Root Nation EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G initially gave me mixed feelings due to its somewhat generic design and the camera setup that seemed to be a direct copy of its predecessor. I also had concerns about the Exynos 1480, as Galaxy devices with Samsung’s proprietary chips often underperformed compared to those with Snapdragon processors. However, after testing the new model, I must admit I’m pleasantly surprised by its real-world performance. However, the new Samsung Galaxy A55 5G will have a tough time competing with its rivals. This was also the case with the previous generation, which eventually became a global bestseller. The newly tested smartphone also has the potential to achieve similar success. The Samsung Galaxy A55 is indeed a solid mobile device with many features, a quality display, and decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 93% Preis: 90% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: Root Nation EN→DE
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G initially gave me mixed feelings due to its somewhat generic design and the camera setup that seemed to be a direct copy of its predecessor. I also had concerns about the Exynos 1480, as Galaxy devices with Samsung’s proprietary chips often underperformed compared to those with Snapdragon processors. However, after testing the new model, I must admit I’m pleasantly surprised by its real-world performance. However, the new Samsung Galaxy A55 5G will have a tough time competing with its rivals. This was also the case with the previous generation, which eventually became a global bestseller. The newly tested smartphone also has the potential to achieve similar success. The Samsung Galaxy A55 is indeed a solid mobile device with many features, a quality display, and decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 93% Preis: 90% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
Set against its most stylish rivals, the A55 5G’s chunky design is hard to get too excited about. Sensibly, though, Samsung has focused on more meaningful improvements: the new processor yields a decent uptick in performance, the display has got bigger and better and the body has been toughened with metal edges and stronger glass. It’s a shame that the cameras were left out of the upgrade party, but they remain perfectly capable shooters. I still narrowly prefer the Pixel 7a overall, not least for its superior cameras, and I have a soft spot for the longer-lasting Nothing Phone (2a), but neither can match the Galaxy A55 5G for software support – both commit to fewer OS updates – and they lack the Samsung’s microSD slot, too. If expandable storage and software longevity are higher on your priority list, the Galaxy A55 5G will not disappoint; it’s a terrific all-rounder and the best-value Samsung handset you can get right now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
Set against its most stylish rivals, the A55 5G’s chunky design is hard to get too excited about. Sensibly, though, Samsung has focused on more meaningful improvements: the new processor yields a decent uptick in performance, the display has got bigger and better and the body has been toughened with metal edges and stronger glass. It’s a shame that the cameras were left out of the upgrade party, but they remain perfectly capable shooters. I still narrowly prefer the Pixel 7a overall, not least for its superior cameras, and I have a soft spot for the longer-lasting Nothing Phone (2a), but neither can match the Galaxy A55 5G for software support – both commit to fewer OS updates – and they lack the Samsung’s microSD slot, too. If expandable storage and software longevity are higher on your priority list, the Galaxy A55 5G will not disappoint; it’s a terrific all-rounder and the best-value Samsung handset you can get right now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
Set against its most stylish rivals, the A55 5G’s chunky design is hard to get too excited about. Sensibly, though, Samsung has focused on more meaningful improvements: the new processor yields a decent uptick in performance, the display has got bigger and better and the body has been toughened with metal edges and stronger glass. It’s a shame that the cameras were left out of the upgrade party, but they remain perfectly capable shooters. I still narrowly prefer the Pixel 7a overall, not least for its superior cameras, and I have a soft spot for the longer-lasting Nothing Phone (2a), but neither can match the Galaxy A55 5G for software support – both commit to fewer OS updates – and they lack the Samsung’s microSD slot, too.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
Set against its most stylish rivals, the A55 5G’s chunky design is hard to get too excited about. Sensibly, though, Samsung has focused on more meaningful improvements: the new processor yields a decent uptick in performance, the display has got bigger and better and the body has been toughened with metal edges and stronger glass. It’s a shame that the cameras were left out of the upgrade party, but they remain perfectly capable shooters. I still narrowly prefer the Pixel 7a overall, not least for its superior cameras, and I have a soft spot for the longer-lasting Nothing Phone (2a), but neither can match the Galaxy A55 5G for software support – both commit to fewer OS updates – and they lack the Samsung’s microSD slot, too.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 is a tricky sell at its original price of £439 considering its battery life, camera performance and software support period are a step behind the £499 Pixel 8A. But its reduced price makes it a different value proposition. It's not a phone that will wow you with pro-level camera skills or amazing new AI features, but it's a solid option for those in search of a basic phone that can handle everyday tasks, with a bit of casual gaming and video streaming thrown in.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 is a tricky sell at its original price of £439 considering its battery life, camera performance and software support period are a step behind the £499 Pixel 8A. But its reduced price makes it a different value proposition. It's not a phone that will wow you with pro-level camera skills or amazing new AI features, but it's a solid option for those in search of a basic phone that can handle everyday tasks, with a bit of casual gaming and video streaming thrown in.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 is a tricky sell at its original price of £439 considering its battery life, camera performance and software support period are a step behind the £499 Pixel 8A. But its reduced price makes it a different value proposition. It's not a phone that will wow you with pro-level camera skills or amazing new AI features, but it's a solid option for those in search of a basic phone that can handle everyday tasks, with a bit of casual gaming and video streaming thrown in.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 is a tricky sell at its original price of £439 considering its battery life, camera performance and software support period are a step behind the £499 Pixel 8A. But its reduced price makes it a different value proposition. It's not a phone that will wow you with pro-level camera skills or amazing new AI features, but it's a solid option for those in search of a basic phone that can handle everyday tasks, with a bit of casual gaming and video streaming thrown in.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
It is immediately apparent that the Galaxy A55 wins on nearly every front against its predecessor. Everywhere else, it’s a draw, so in the end, the A55 comes out on top anyway. It offers a more modern and robust build, better performance, potentially faster charging and longer battery life, as well as the great cameras familiar with the Galaxy A54. What’s more, it’s all for £10 less than the price of the A54 if you live in the UK. On the other hand, if you live in the US where the A55 isn’t available, your best option is to buy the Galaxy A35, as it’s a lot cheaper.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.06.2024
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
It is immediately apparent that the Galaxy A55 wins on nearly every front against its predecessor. Everywhere else, it’s a draw, so in the end, the A55 comes out on top anyway. It offers a more modern and robust build, better performance, potentially faster charging and longer battery life, as well as the great cameras familiar with the Galaxy A54. What’s more, it’s all for £10 less than the price of the A54 if you live in the UK. On the other hand, if you live in the US where the A55 isn’t available, your best option is to buy the Galaxy A35, as it’s a lot cheaper.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.06.2024
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 is a tricky sell at its original price of £439 considering its battery life, camera performance and software support period are a step behind the £499 Pixel 8A. But its reduced price makes it a different value proposition. It's not a phone that will wow you with pro-level camera skills or amazing new AI features, but it's a solid option for those in search of a basic phone that can handle everyday tasks, with a bit of casual gaming and video streaming thrown in.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: CNet EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 is a tricky sell at its original price of £439 considering its battery life, camera performance and software support period are a step behind the £499 Pixel 8A. But its reduced price makes it a different value proposition. It's not a phone that will wow you with pro-level camera skills or amazing new AI features, but it's a solid option for those in search of a basic phone that can handle everyday tasks, with a bit of casual gaming and video streaming thrown in.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Amateur Photographer EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 looks like a premium phone, but it’s significantly cheaper than the Samsung S series of phones, and is even cheaper that Google’s latest entry-level phone, the Google Pixel 8A. The A55 offers a great set of cameras, and gives the Pixel 8A a serious run for it’s money, with better results in some situations. If you can get the A55 for under £300, then this is a real bargain, although unfortunately, the phone isn’t currently available in the US. For those people who just want a great phone, but aren’t too worried about having a telephoto camera, or AI features, then the Samsung Galaxy A55 is a great option. You get a larger 6.6inch screen, a 120Hz refresh rate, good battery life, improved build quality with a metal frame, and uprated Gorilla Glass Victus+. Samsung phones are easy to use, as well as giving lots of different photo options.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Amateur Photographer EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 looks like a premium phone, but it’s significantly cheaper than the Samsung S series of phones, and is even cheaper that Google’s latest entry-level phone, the Google Pixel 8A. The A55 offers a great set of cameras, and gives the Pixel 8A a serious run for it’s money, with better results in some situations. If you can get the A55 for under £300, then this is a real bargain, although unfortunately, the phone isn’t currently available in the US. For those people who just want a great phone, but aren’t too worried about having a telephoto camera, or AI features, then the Samsung Galaxy A55 is a great option. You get a larger 6.6inch screen, a 120Hz refresh rate, good battery life, improved build quality with a metal frame, and uprated Gorilla Glass Victus+. Samsung phones are easy to use, as well as giving lots of different photo options.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: T3 EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 is a solid mid-range phone that upsizes the display to 6.6-inches for this series, giving the people what they want, but does come up against stiff competition in the Nothing Phone (2a) – a cheaper device that offers a better gaming performance overall. On balance, I've found the use of materials and the battery longevity in the Samsung to outpace its rival, though, so if you want a faster-loading Camera app and fewer fingerprint smears on the design then the Galaxy A55 hits its stride in multiple areas. However, the Galaxy is no longer the de-facto mid-range purchase, especially as the Galaxy S23 FE is a viable alternative. But as a cost-effective Android option the Samsung Galaxy A55 is well worth considering if core build quality is a must, but flagship pricing is a must-not.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: T3 EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 is a solid mid-range phone that upsizes the display to 6.6-inches for this series, giving the people what they want, but does come up against stiff competition in the Nothing Phone (2a) – a cheaper device that offers a better gaming performance overall. On balance, I've found the use of materials and the battery longevity in the Samsung to outpace its rival, though, so if you want a faster-loading Camera app and fewer fingerprint smears on the design then the Galaxy A55 hits its stride in multiple areas. However, the Galaxy is no longer the de-facto mid-range purchase, especially as the Galaxy S23 FE is a viable alternative. But as a cost-effective Android option the Samsung Galaxy A55 is well worth considering if core build quality is a must, but flagship pricing is a must-not.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
If you’re shopping for a mid-range phone in 2024, there’s a lot of box-ticking happening in this category. Thankfully, Samsung is a pretty sure-fire bet in this space and its latest release, the Galaxy A55, is another strong contender to become one of the best cheap phones you can get. Like its predecessor, it’s a mid-tier phone with a design that arguably looks and feels as good as its flagship counterpart. It might not possess all the high-end components and cutting-edge features of the Galaxy S range, but straight out of the box, the Galaxy A55 looks and feels like a premium smartphone – all while costing less than half the handsets that sit atop our list of the best Samsung phones. And while it might be slightly sacrilegious, I think it's even more attractive than the Samsung Galaxy S24. The A55 has kept the elegantly smooth and clean design of its predecessor, including the shiny back glass that was a major improvement over the Samsung Galaxy A53.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
If you’re shopping for a mid-range phone in 2024, there’s a lot of box-ticking happening in this category. Thankfully, Samsung is a pretty sure-fire bet in this space and its latest release, the Galaxy A55, is another strong contender to become one of the best cheap phones you can get. Like its predecessor, it’s a mid-tier phone with a design that arguably looks and feels as good as its flagship counterpart. It might not possess all the high-end components and cutting-edge features of the Galaxy S range, but straight out of the box, the Galaxy A55 looks and feels like a premium smartphone – all while costing less than half the handsets that sit atop our list of the best Samsung phones. And while it might be slightly sacrilegious, I think it's even more attractive than the Samsung Galaxy S24. The A55 has kept the elegantly smooth and clean design of its predecessor, including the shiny back glass that was a major improvement over the Samsung Galaxy A53.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 5G takes a lot of design cues from the Galaxy S24 series, but it also resembles recent iPhones in some ways. It now has an aluminum frame with flat edges and rounded corners, and I’m glad to see the company ditch the cheap-feeling plastic frame of its predecessor, the Galaxy A54 5G — combined with one of Samsung’s ever-stunning AMOLED displays, it goes a long way to making the phone feel like a premium piece of kit. Samsung’s mid-ranger retains a glass back, too, and the Awesome Navy model I tested brings a glossy finish that isn’t a total fingerprint magnet. The phone also features the so-called Key Island, a raised area on the frame that houses the volume and power buttons. But this design element is more subtle in person than renders would have you believe. Samsung has unsurprisingly retained an IP67 rating this time for dust and water resistance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 5G takes a lot of design cues from the Galaxy S24 series, but it also resembles recent iPhones in some ways. It now has an aluminum frame with flat edges and rounded corners, and I’m glad to see the company ditch the cheap-feeling plastic frame of its predecessor, the Galaxy A54 5G — combined with one of Samsung’s ever-stunning AMOLED displays, it goes a long way to making the phone feel like a premium piece of kit. Samsung’s mid-ranger retains a glass back, too, and the Awesome Navy model I tested brings a glossy finish that isn’t a total fingerprint magnet. The phone also features the so-called Key Island, a raised area on the frame that houses the volume and power buttons.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 5G takes a lot of design cues from the Galaxy S24 series, but it also resembles recent iPhones in some ways. It now has an aluminum frame with flat edges and rounded corners, and I’m glad to see the company ditch the cheap-feeling plastic frame of its predecessor, the Galaxy A54 5G — combined with one of Samsung’s ever-stunning AMOLED displays, it goes a long way to making the phone feel like a premium piece of kit. Samsung’s mid-ranger retains a glass back, too, and the Awesome Navy model I tested brings a glossy finish that isn’t a total fingerprint magnet. The phone also features the so-called Key Island, a raised area on the frame that houses the volume and power buttons. But this design element is more subtle in person than renders would have you believe. Samsung has unsurprisingly retained an IP67 rating this time for dust and water resistance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 5G takes a lot of design cues from the Galaxy S24 series, but it also resembles recent iPhones in some ways. It now has an aluminum frame with flat edges and rounded corners, and I’m glad to see the company ditch the cheap-feeling plastic frame of its predecessor, the Galaxy A54 5G — combined with one of Samsung’s ever-stunning AMOLED displays, it goes a long way to making the phone feel like a premium piece of kit. Samsung’s mid-ranger retains a glass back, too, and the Awesome Navy model I tested brings a glossy finish that isn’t a total fingerprint magnet. The phone also features the so-called Key Island, a raised area on the frame that houses the volume and power buttons.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 and Galaxy A35 are equipped with decent cameras and processors, but are these the best midrange smartphones you can buy today? The answer depends on what you need from your smartphone. Subjectively speaking, these are good-looking smartphones that are promised to receive Android OS updates for four years and an additional year of security updates. It's also good to see an IP67 rating on these phones, and battery performance is excellent, even though Samsung has stuck with support for 25W charging and doesn't include an adapter in the box. On the other hand, if you want a smartphone with raw performance, you're better off looking at the Nothing Phone 2 (Review), OnePlus 12R (Review), or the iQoo Neo 9 Pro (Review) instead of the Galaxy A55.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 and Galaxy A35 are equipped with decent cameras and processors, but are these the best midrange smartphones you can buy today? The answer depends on what you need from your smartphone. Subjectively speaking, these are good-looking smartphones that are promised to receive Android OS updates for four years and an additional year of security updates. It's also good to see an IP67 rating on these phones, and battery performance is excellent, even though Samsung has stuck with support for 25W charging and doesn't include an adapter in the box. On the other hand, if you want a smartphone with raw performance, you're better off looking at the Nothing Phone 2 (Review), OnePlus 12R (Review), or the iQoo Neo 9 Pro (Review) instead of the Galaxy A55.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 is an excellent alternative to Samsung’s most expensive phones for the kind of person who can’t, or doesn’t want to, spend true flagship phone money. It’s as if Samsung has injected a little iPhone design DNA, and just cut out a few of the most expensive features to appeal to the widest possible audience. No, it doesn’t have incredible raw power, but many people won’t notice the difference. Sure, it doesn’t have the incredible camera zoom power of a Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. But it can still take pleasing photos at any time of the day. Charging speed requires some patience if you’re upgrading from a phone with lighting-fast charge pace. But the same applies to all Samsung phones, to some extent.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 is an excellent alternative to Samsung’s most expensive phones for the kind of person who can’t, or doesn’t want to, spend true flagship phone money. It’s as if Samsung has injected a little iPhone design DNA, and just cut out a few of the most expensive features to appeal to the widest possible audience. No, it doesn’t have incredible raw power, but many people won’t notice the difference. Sure, it doesn’t have the incredible camera zoom power of a Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. But it can still take pleasing photos at any time of the day. Charging speed requires some patience if you’re upgrading from a phone with lighting-fast charge pace. But the same applies to all Samsung phones, to some extent.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G showed a strong overall battery performance, with considerable improvements over its predecessor, the Galaxy A54 5G, in autonomy and efficiency. Equipped with a battery of 5000 mAh, the Samsung Galaxy A55’s autonomy lasted 57 hours and 13 minutes under moderate usage, which was above average. The autonomy of outdoor activities was also very impressive, especially when navigating and browsing social apps. Regarding the individual use cases, the Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrated above-average autonomy when playing video games, calling, and idling with the screen off. However, the device struggled in autonomy when watching online videos and listening to music. The Samsung Galaxy A55 needed 1 hour and 24 minutes to be fully charged, which was relatively slow compared to other tested devices.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.05.2024
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G showed a strong overall battery performance, with considerable improvements over its predecessor, the Galaxy A54 5G, in autonomy and efficiency. Equipped with a battery of 5000 mAh, the Samsung Galaxy A55’s autonomy lasted 57 hours and 13 minutes under moderate usage, which was above average. The autonomy of outdoor activities was also very impressive, especially when navigating and browsing social apps. Regarding the individual use cases, the Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrated above-average autonomy when playing video games, calling, and idling with the screen off. However, the device struggled in autonomy when watching online videos and listening to music. The Samsung Galaxy A55 needed 1 hour and 24 minutes to be fully charged, which was relatively slow compared to other tested devices.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.05.2024
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
With a step up in build quality, a larger display, and a faster processor, the Galaxy A55 5G is a worthy advancement over the Galaxy A54 5G. It’s cheaper than before too, though still not the outstanding value of some of its competitors.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
With a step up in build quality, a larger display, and a faster processor, the Galaxy A55 5G is a worthy advancement over the Galaxy A54 5G. It’s cheaper than before too, though still not the outstanding value of some of its competitors.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G display provided an impressive performance for its High-end segment, with a strong performance in video. When watching videos, particularly indoors, the A55 5G’s overall screen brightness provided good rendering and a good level of details in dark areas. However, there was an occasional slight orange cast visible when viewing videos and screen luminance in an indoor environment could have been slightly higher for HDR10 content. The device’s screen measured a peak brightness under sunlight conditions of 1638 nits in High Brightness Mode, considerably higher than advertised, and well above its predecessor A54 5G’s 1344 nits. The peak brightness approached the peak level of Samsung’s premium Galaxy S23 model, which was measured at 1600 nits. In terms of reflectance and flicker, our testers saw little improvement from the predecessor’s already-weak showing.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.04.2024
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G display provided an impressive performance for its High-end segment, with a strong performance in video. When watching videos, particularly indoors, the A55 5G’s overall screen brightness provided good rendering and a good level of details in dark areas. However, there was an occasional slight orange cast visible when viewing videos and screen luminance in an indoor environment could have been slightly higher for HDR10 content. The device’s screen measured a peak brightness under sunlight conditions of 1638 nits in High Brightness Mode, considerably higher than advertised, and well above its predecessor A54 5G’s 1344 nits. The peak brightness approached the peak level of Samsung’s premium Galaxy S23 model, which was measured at 1600 nits. In terms of reflectance and flicker, our testers saw little improvement from the predecessor’s already-weak showing.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.04.2024
Quelle: Digital Trends EN→DE
Thankfully, my rocky start with the Samsung Galaxy A55 didn’t continue, but does that mean it has transformed into a highly desirable, must-buy phone? Not quite, but it’s certainly not one to be dismissed. While it has been a very good phone to live with, it’s not a big update over the Galaxy A54 at all, and there’s a lot of strong competition around it. It is let down by the sharp, angled design, which is aesthetically pleasing, but horrid to hold for long periods. This aside, the Galaxy A55 has long battery life, a great screen, and enough performance to crush all everyday tasks. The camera isn’t the best you can get for this price, though, and the lack of wireless charging is frustrating. It’s a good phone, just not an outstanding one, but I’ve happily lived with it and haven’t been desperate to swap my SIM out of it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Digital Trends EN→DE
Thankfully, my rocky start with the Samsung Galaxy A55 didn’t continue, but does that mean it has transformed into a highly desirable, must-buy phone? Not quite, but it’s certainly not one to be dismissed. While it has been a very good phone to live with, it’s not a big update over the Galaxy A54 at all, and there’s a lot of strong competition around it. It is let down by the sharp, angled design, which is aesthetically pleasing, but horrid to hold for long periods. This aside, the Galaxy A55 has long battery life, a great screen, and enough performance to crush all everyday tasks. The camera isn’t the best you can get for this price, though, and the lack of wireless charging is frustrating. It’s a good phone, just not an outstanding one, but I’ve happily lived with it and haven’t been desperate to swap my SIM out of it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: T3 EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 is a solid mid-range phone that upsizes the display to 6.6-inches for this series, giving the people what they want, but does come up against stiff competition in the Nothing Phone (2a) – a cheaper device that offers a better gaming performance overall. On balance, I've found the use of materials and the battery longevity in the Samsung to outpace its rival, though, so if you want a faster-loading Camera app and fewer fingerprint smears on the design then the Galaxy A55 hits its stride in multiple areas. However, the Galaxy is no longer the de-facto mid-range purchase, especially as the Galaxy S23 FE is a viable alternative. But as a cost-effective Android option the Samsung Galaxy A55 is well worth considering if core build quality is a must, but flagship pricing is a must-not.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: T3 EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 is a solid mid-range phone that upsizes the display to 6.6-inches for this series, giving the people what they want, but does come up against stiff competition in the Nothing Phone (2a) – a cheaper device that offers a better gaming performance overall. On balance, I've found the use of materials and the battery longevity in the Samsung to outpace its rival, though, so if you want a faster-loading Camera app and fewer fingerprint smears on the design then the Galaxy A55 hits its stride in multiple areas. However, the Galaxy is no longer the de-facto mid-range purchase, especially as the Galaxy S23 FE is a viable alternative. But as a cost-effective Android option the Samsung Galaxy A55 is well worth considering if core build quality is a must, but flagship pricing is a must-not.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 5G is the latest addition to Samsung’s A-series lineup, offering a fresh twist on a proven design. Building upon the success of the Galaxy A35 5G, the A55 5G retains familiar aesthetics while introducing substantial upgrades. Join us in this Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Review as we take a closer look at what this device brings to the mid-range market. Although the A55 5G comes at a higher price point than its predecessor, it boasts a variety of exciting features designed to attract users seeking a blend of style and performance. So, let’s get started, shall we?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Manila Shaker
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.04.2024
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 5G is the latest addition to Samsung’s A-series lineup, offering a fresh twist on a proven design. Building upon the success of the Galaxy A35 5G, the A55 5G retains familiar aesthetics while introducing substantial upgrades. Join us in this Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Review as we take a closer look at what this device brings to the mid-range market. Although the A55 5G comes at a higher price point than its predecessor, it boasts a variety of exciting features designed to attract users seeking a blend of style and performance. So, let’s get started, shall we?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Manila Shaker
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.04.2024
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE
I’m happy to report that the Samsung Galaxy A55 is cheap but very good, just like the phones that came before it. Although the inbound Pixel 8a could spell trouble, the Galaxy A55 could still be the better value of the two if the Pixel remains more expensive than the Samsung. Future-gazing aside, the Galaxy A55 has a better blend of features than the performance-oriented OnePlus 12R, and is noticeably cheaper too if you don't have access to the cheaper 8GB/128GB variant. As for Google’s current Pixel 7a, you get a more consistent photography experience with it than with the Galaxy A55, and it's a little more powerful too. But the Galaxy's larger size and surprisingly usable macro camera may be enough to persuade you to stick with Samsung instead. The Galaxy A55, as of the publishing of this review, is definitely going on the top of our best cheap phones guide.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE
I’m happy to report that the Samsung Galaxy A55 is cheap but very good, just like the phones that came before it. Although the inbound Pixel 8a could spell trouble, the Galaxy A55 could still be the better value of the two if the Pixel remains more expensive than the Samsung. Future-gazing aside, the Galaxy A55 has a better blend of features than the performance-oriented OnePlus 12R, and is noticeably cheaper too if you don't have access to the cheaper 8GB/128GB variant. As for Google’s current Pixel 7a, you get a more consistent photography experience with it than with the Galaxy A55, and it's a little more powerful too. But the Galaxy's larger size and surprisingly usable macro camera may be enough to persuade you to stick with Samsung instead. The Galaxy A55, as of the publishing of this review, is definitely going on the top of our best cheap phones guide.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Gadgetguy EN→DE
If you hate the feel of plastic but don’t want to pay more than a thousand bucks for a phone, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is a solid choice. Its screen is gorgeous, and the aluminium frame adds a premium feel without bleeding your wallet dry in the process. Between the A35 and the A55, I firmly believe the A35 represents the best value. Both are great phones, although the difference between them is incremental. If you want moderate performance gains, a sturdier body, and eSIM compatibility, pick the A55. Otherwise, you can save $150 by choosing the A35.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 75% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Gadgetguy EN→DE
If you hate the feel of plastic but don’t want to pay more than a thousand bucks for a phone, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is a solid choice. Its screen is gorgeous, and the aluminium frame adds a premium feel without bleeding your wallet dry in the process. Between the A35 and the A55, I firmly believe the A35 represents the best value. Both are great phones, although the difference between them is incremental. If you want moderate performance gains, a sturdier body, and eSIM compatibility, pick the A55. Otherwise, you can save $150 by choosing the A35.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 75% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
Set against its most stylish rivals, the A55 5G’s chunky design is hard to get too excited about. Sensibly, though, Samsung has focused on more meaningful improvements: the new processor yields a decent uptick in performance, the display has got bigger and better and the body has been toughened with metal edges and stronger glass. It’s a shame that the cameras were left out of the upgrade party, but they remain perfectly capable shooters. I still narrowly prefer the Pixel 7a overall, not least for its superior cameras, and I have a soft spot for the longer-lasting Nothing Phone (2a), but neither can match the Galaxy A55 5G for software support – both commit to fewer OS updates – and they lack the Samsung’s microSD slot, too. If expandable storage and software longevity are higher on your priority list, the Galaxy A55 5G will not disappoint; it’s a terrific all-rounder and the best-value Samsung handset you can get right now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Stuff TV EN→DE
The Galaxy A-series remains Samsung’s most popular phone line in certain parts of the world, so I can understand why the firm played it safe for the Galaxy A55. It’ll feel instantly familiar to owners of older Galaxy handsets, with some nice-to-haves that let it rub shoulders with more expensive rivals. The metal frame was a treat for the fingertips every time I took the phone out of my pocket. IP67 resistance is always reassuring, and it has very respectable long-term software support for a mid-ranger. This is still a modest update over last year’s effort, though. It didn’t blow me away on performance, battery life or camera quality, which were merely on par with the more wallet-friendly competition. A Nothing 2a might be plastic fantastic, but it’s just as nippy and takes an equally pleasing picture, while costing £100 less.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
Set against its most stylish rivals, the A55 5G’s chunky design is hard to get too excited about. Sensibly, though, Samsung has focused on more meaningful improvements: the new processor yields a decent uptick in performance, the display has got bigger and better and the body has been toughened with metal edges and stronger glass. It’s a shame that the cameras were left out of the upgrade party, but they remain perfectly capable shooters. I still narrowly prefer the Pixel 7a overall, not least for its superior cameras, and I have a soft spot for the longer-lasting Nothing Phone (2a), but neither can match the Galaxy A55 5G for software support – both commit to fewer OS updates – and they lack the Samsung’s microSD slot, too. If expandable storage and software longevity are higher on your priority list, the Galaxy A55 5G will not disappoint; it’s a terrific all-rounder and the best-value Samsung handset you can get right now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Stuff TV EN→DE
The Galaxy A-series remains Samsung’s most popular phone line in certain parts of the world, so I can understand why the firm played it safe for the Galaxy A55. It’ll feel instantly familiar to owners of older Galaxy handsets, with some nice-to-haves that let it rub shoulders with more expensive rivals. The metal frame was a treat for the fingertips every time I took the phone out of my pocket. IP67 resistance is always reassuring, and it has very respectable long-term software support for a mid-ranger. This is still a modest update over last year’s effort, though. It didn’t blow me away on performance, battery life or camera quality, which were merely on par with the more wallet-friendly competition. A Nothing 2a might be plastic fantastic, but it’s just as nippy and takes an equally pleasing picture, while costing £100 less.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
If you’re more into premium and robust design, the best performance, and cameras with slightly higher resolution, the Galaxy A55 will be a great buy, as it has everything Samsung currently offers in its mid-range price range. However, if you’re looking for a more affordable option that also offers modern design, solid performance, and almost the same cameras, the Galaxy A35 is the better buy, especially for £100 less in the UK. And if you live in the US, the choice is even more obvious, as the A55 is not available there. However, looking at the fact that the A54 can now be bought for £15 less than the A35, I’d much rather recommend this model if you’re ok with it already being one life into is software support lifespan.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.04.2024
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
If you’re more into premium and robust design, the best performance, and cameras with slightly higher resolution, the Galaxy A55 will be a great buy, as it has everything Samsung currently offers in its mid-range price range. However, if you’re looking for a more affordable option that also offers modern design, solid performance, and almost the same cameras, the Galaxy A35 is the better buy, especially for £100 less in the UK. And if you live in the US, the choice is even more obvious, as the A55 is not available there. However, looking at the fact that the A54 can now be bought for £15 less than the A35, I’d much rather recommend this model if you’re ok with it already being one life into is software support lifespan.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.04.2024
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 is a decent mid-range smartphone on its own. It has a great display, a decent chipset, and a great camera setup. The battery performance is also quite decent. However, this price point is highly competitive, and other smartphones at the same price offer far better features and hardware inside. Samsung’s device beats this smartphone in every aspect of the smartphone. It’s none other than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE. It is available but will cost a little more but offers a significantly better chipset, camera, battery, and even display. On top of that, the Galaxy S23 FE offers wireless charging and telephoto and they are both missing from the Galaxy A55. It’s this reason why Samsung refused to launch the Galaxy A55 in the US market as it would be DOA.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.04.2024
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 is a decent mid-range smartphone on its own. It has a great display, a decent chipset, and a great camera setup. The battery performance is also quite decent. However, this price point is highly competitive, and other smartphones at the same price offer far better features and hardware inside. Samsung’s device beats this smartphone in every aspect of the smartphone. It’s none other than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE. It is available but will cost a little more but offers a significantly better chipset, camera, battery, and even display. On top of that, the Galaxy S23 FE offers wireless charging and telephoto and they are both missing from the Galaxy A55. It’s this reason why Samsung refused to launch the Galaxy A55 in the US market as it would be DOA.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.04.2024
Quelle: Pokde EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G is intended for those who want a premium, flagship-like experience without splurging too much. It looks and feels like one, but the biggest area it would lack compared to a conventional flagship is graphical performance. I’m still happy to see what the Exynos 1480 brings to the table and at the end of the day, it’s a midrange smartphone with a solid value proposition at RM1,999, even with all its drawbacks considered.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 80% Leistung: 68% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Pokde EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G is intended for those who want a premium, flagship-like experience without splurging too much. It looks and feels like one, but the biggest area it would lack compared to a conventional flagship is graphical performance. I’m still happy to see what the Exynos 1480 brings to the table and at the end of the day, it’s a midrange smartphone with a solid value proposition at RM1,999, even with all its drawbacks considered.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 80% Leistung: 68% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit EN EN→DE
Samsung is apparently marching to its own beat in the intermediate market. The South Korean company seems pretty comfortable with its yearly incremental updates, and the market in general appears to be settled in the same rhythm, just look at the Redmi Note 13 family, the direct competitor to the Galaxy A phones. Of course, there are better options if you prioritize camera or gaming performance. But the Galaxy A55 is the same balanced and safe option for budget-conscious consumers that made its predecessors so popular to begin with. Just don’t expect the same premium experience and performance of the Galaxy S models. It would have been nice to see faster charging, a true camera upgrade, or more battery capacity, especially in light of the bigger dimensions. But the bigger display, more efficient processor, and especially the more premium design will probably be good enough upgrades for potential buyers, and also for the current mid-range market.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit EN EN→DE
Samsung is apparently marching to its own beat in the intermediate market. The South Korean company seems pretty comfortable with its yearly incremental updates, and the market in general appears to be settled in the same rhythm, just look at the Redmi Note 13 family, the direct competitor to the Galaxy A phones. Of course, there are better options if you prioritize camera or gaming performance. But the Galaxy A55 is the same balanced and safe option for budget-conscious consumers that made its predecessors so popular to begin with. Just don’t expect the same premium experience and performance of the Galaxy S models. It would have been nice to see faster charging, a true camera upgrade, or more battery capacity, especially in light of the bigger dimensions. But the bigger display, more efficient processor, and especially the more premium design will probably be good enough upgrades for potential buyers, and also for the current mid-range market.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
This year Samsung has kept things simple and minimal with the A55 5G, with the only meaningful upgrade being the new Exynos 1480 chipset, which is not even that much more powerful than the previous generation. There is also the tweaked design, dropping plastic altogether and adding a metal frame that makes the phone feel more high-end. If you don't mind the slightly lower performance and somewhat worse audio quality on the Galaxy A35, then you might as well go for that one, as it offers mostly the some user experience but for £100/€100 less. Of course, you have other options outside of what Samsung offers in this price range, such as the upcoming Pixel 8a, which might not be that much better in terms of performance, but might very well come with an even better camera system and even some Google AI features to boot.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.04.2024
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE
South Korean electronics giant Samsung recently refreshed its Galaxy A-series smartphone portfolio by launching the Galaxy A55. Priced from Rs 39,999, the smartphone boasts a large 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display of a 120Hz refresh rate, a durable metal frame, a 50-megapixel main camera with optical image stabilisation, and a long-lasting 5000mAh battery. While it offers the essentials, Samsung seems to have put some extra thought into the A55's design. But is it the standout option in the mid-range segment? Let us find out.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2024
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
This year Samsung has kept things simple and minimal with the A55 5G, with the only meaningful upgrade being the new Exynos 1480 chipset, which is not even that much more powerful than the previous generation. There is also the tweaked design, dropping plastic altogether and adding a metal frame that makes the phone feel more high-end. If you don't mind the slightly lower performance and somewhat worse audio quality on the Galaxy A35, then you might as well go for that one, as it offers mostly the some user experience but for £100/€100 less. Of course, you have other options outside of what Samsung offers in this price range, such as the upcoming Pixel 8a, which might not be that much better in terms of performance, but might very well come with an even better camera system and even some Google AI features to boot.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.04.2024
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE
South Korean electronics giant Samsung recently refreshed its Galaxy A-series smartphone portfolio by launching the Galaxy A55. Priced from Rs 39,999, the smartphone boasts a large 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display of a 120Hz refresh rate, a durable metal frame, a 50-megapixel main camera with optical image stabilisation, and a long-lasting 5000mAh battery. While it offers the essentials, Samsung seems to have put some extra thought into the A55's design. But is it the standout option in the mid-range segment? Let us find out.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2024
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 builds on the solid formula of its predecessors and expands on it in meaningful ways, blending a number of desirable features from flagship phones while adding enhanced security via their Samsung Knox Vault to the mix, all at a reasonable price point.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 builds on the solid formula of its predecessors and expands on it in meaningful ways, blending a number of desirable features from flagship phones while adding enhanced security via their Samsung Knox Vault to the mix, all at a reasonable price point.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: GSM Arena
The Samsung Galaxy A55 is the hottest new addition to the Galaxy A-series. Along with the Galaxy A35, the two form a formidable proposition in the midrange. Check out our video review to learn ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW about the phone's top features, build and screen quality, battery life, performance, and camera image quality.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.03.2024
Quelle: GSM Arena
The Samsung Galaxy A55 is the hottest new addition to the Galaxy A-series. Along with the Galaxy A35, the two form a formidable proposition in the midrange. Check out our video review to learn ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW about the phone's top features, build and screen quality, battery life, performance, and camera image quality.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.03.2024
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
While it is not a bad phone by any means, the Galaxy A55 does fall off in the performance department when compared to the OnePlus 12R (review) and the Vivo V30 Pro (review), which more or less cost the same. So if you are a heavy user or want a gaming phone, the Galaxy A55 might not be for you. However, if you like OneUI or want a phone that will last you almost half a decade, offers water and dust resistance and don’t mind the weight and average cameras, the Galaxy A55 might be a good choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
While it is not a bad phone by any means, the Galaxy A55 does fall off in the performance department when compared to the OnePlus 12R (review) and the Vivo V30 Pro (review), which more or less cost the same. So if you are a heavy user or want a gaming phone, the Galaxy A55 might not be for you. However, if you like OneUI or want a phone that will last you almost half a decade, offers water and dust resistance and don’t mind the weight and average cameras, the Galaxy A55 might be a good choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
In the end, it's the price tag that keeps us from recommending the A55 outright. There are many sensible options around the same price point and even handsets at a much lower price with similar, if not better, user experience. And while it may sound like nit-picking, small things add up. For instance, we are very disappointed by the fingerprint reader; we are not fans of the virtual proximity sensor, and the thick screen bezels are off-putting. All in all, the Galaxy A55 is a good phone, but not at this price. We suspect other cheaper or similarly priced devices from Samsung itself will cannibalize Galaxy A55 sales unless its price drops significantly in the coming months. Then, it would be a rather easy recommendation.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
The final question that I want to answer in this review is – should you buy the Galaxy A55? Actually, let me rephrase that – is the Galaxy A55 worth the price? In Malaysia it’s at RM1,999. I still think it’s a bit too high but Samsung Malaysia is perpetually having a sale for their phones anyway. If you can get the A55 at around – let’s say RM1,600, then I think it’s actually worth the price. Yes, it’s a mid-range phone but it’s a very capable phone. The photos taken at night is what surprised me the most. I think the A55 just takes better night shots than the S24 Ultra – at least during the firmware version during out test.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2024
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
In the end, it's the price tag that keeps us from recommending the A55 outright. There are many sensible options around the same price point and even handsets at a much lower price with similar, if not better, user experience. And while it may sound like nit-picking, small things add up. For instance, we are very disappointed by the fingerprint reader; we are not fans of the virtual proximity sensor, and the thick screen bezels are off-putting. All in all, the Galaxy A55 is a good phone, but not at this price. We suspect other cheaper or similarly priced devices from Samsung itself will cannibalize Galaxy A55 sales unless its price drops significantly in the coming months. Then, it would be a rather easy recommendation.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
The final question that I want to answer in this review is – should you buy the Galaxy A55? Actually, let me rephrase that – is the Galaxy A55 worth the price? In Malaysia it’s at RM1,999. I still think it’s a bit too high but Samsung Malaysia is perpetually having a sale for their phones anyway. If you can get the A55 at around – let’s say RM1,600, then I think it’s actually worth the price. Yes, it’s a mid-range phone but it’s a very capable phone. The photos taken at night is what surprised me the most. I think the A55 just takes better night shots than the S24 Ultra – at least during the firmware version during out test.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2024
Quelle: ben's gadget reviews
Samsung's Galaxy A55 is a mid-range phone with the Exynos 1480, 6.6-inch OLED screen, and a solid 50-megapixel main camera. It's the first Samsung A phone to get an all glass and metal build and Samsung Knox. There's a 5,000 mAh battery and IP67 water and dust resistance. The phone won't sell in the US but it's selling in Hong Kong starting at HK$3,400 and in Europe starting at about equivalent of 400 euro.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.03.2024
Quelle: Gadgetguy EN→DE
As an incentive to buy from Samsung directly, you also get a pair of Galaxy Buds FE (valued at $199) at no extra cost when buying the Galaxy A55 5G before 15 April. Plus, there’s a bonus $100 trade-in value when handing in your older phone before 4 April. It’s refreshing to see more features in a mid-range phone without a price increase to boot. There seems to be a lot to like about the A55, as it addresses pretty much every criticism levelled at the last model.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.03.2024
Quelle: ben's gadget reviews
Samsung's Galaxy A55 is a mid-range phone with the Exynos 1480, 6.6-inch OLED screen, and a solid 50-megapixel main camera. It's the first Samsung A phone to get an all glass and metal build and Samsung Knox. There's a 5,000 mAh battery and IP67 water and dust resistance. The phone won't sell in the US but it's selling in Hong Kong starting at HK$3,400 and in Europe starting at about equivalent of 400 euro.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.03.2024
Quelle: Gadgetguy EN→DE
As an incentive to buy from Samsung directly, you also get a pair of Galaxy Buds FE (valued at $199) at no extra cost when buying the Galaxy A55 5G before 15 April. Plus, there’s a bonus $100 trade-in value when handing in your older phone before 4 April. It’s refreshing to see more features in a mid-range phone without a price increase to boot. There seems to be a lot to like about the A55, as it addresses pretty much every criticism levelled at the last model.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.03.2024
Quelle: Tech Spurt
Unboxing the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, with a four day review of the camera tech, gaming performance and beyond. Vs the A54, this year's Galaxy A55 5G feels more premium and boasts some slight specs upgrades. But is Samsung's latest one of the best mid-range smartphones of 2024? The most immediate difference is the design. Not only is the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G bigger than the A54 at 6.6-inches, it also feels far more premium. It's also sadly more iPhone-esque with its flatter edges, but hey ho. That camera setup is very similar, although now it feels faster - while gaming on Genshin Impact is also an improved experience. The Galaxy A55 will blaze through titles like PubG, Call of Duty etc. Battery life so far has been the same as before. Samsung has crammed a 5000mAh cell in here and it'll last you all day if you don't go nuts with the camera or gaming.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.03.2024
Quelle: Tech Spurt
Unboxing the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, with a four day review of the camera tech, gaming performance and beyond. Vs the A54, this year's Galaxy A55 5G feels more premium and boasts some slight specs upgrades. But is Samsung's latest one of the best mid-range smartphones of 2024? The most immediate difference is the design. Not only is the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G bigger than the A54 at 6.6-inches, it also feels far more premium. It's also sadly more iPhone-esque with its flatter edges, but hey ho. That camera setup is very similar, although now it feels faster - while gaming on Genshin Impact is also an improved experience. The Galaxy A55 will blaze through titles like PubG, Call of Duty etc. Battery life so far has been the same as before. Samsung has crammed a 5000mAh cell in here and it'll last you all day if you don't go nuts with the camera or gaming.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.03.2024
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE
Unfortunately, there’s not much else in the box save for a charging cable so you’ll need your own charger. At the time of writing, the Galaxy A55 has just been launched in Malaysia priced at RM1,999 and the early bird specials are solid value with a free pair of Buds FE earbuds thrown in on the house along with an additional one year extended warranty though this is only available until 30th April 2024.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.03.2024
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE
Unfortunately, there’s not much else in the box save for a charging cable so you’ll need your own charger. At the time of writing, the Galaxy A55 has just been launched in Malaysia priced at RM1,999 and the early bird specials are solid value with a free pair of Buds FE earbuds thrown in on the house along with an additional one year extended warranty though this is only available until 30th April 2024.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.03.2024
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE
At Rs 39,999, the Galaxy A55 5G is all about the experience rather than raw power. It does have its shortcomings in some areas when compared to the likes of iQOO Neo 9 Pro and the OnePlus 12R and fails to be a complete package. To make up for it, though, it is solely relying on its software optimisations, features and camera capabilities which might not be enough for the majority, but could still suit some.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE
Unfortunately, there’s not much else in the box save for a charging cable so you’ll need your own charger. At the time of writing, the Galaxy A55 has just been launched in Malaysia priced at RM1,999 and the early bird specials are solid value with a free pair of Buds FE earbuds thrown in on the house along with an additional one year extended warranty though this is only available until 30th April 2024.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.03.2024
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE
Unfortunately, there’s not much else in the box save for a charging cable so you’ll need your own charger. At the time of writing, the Galaxy A55 has just been launched in Malaysia priced at RM1,999 and the early bird specials are solid value with a free pair of Buds FE earbuds thrown in on the house along with an additional one year extended warranty though this is only available until 30th April 2024.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.03.2024
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE
At Rs 39,999, the Galaxy A55 5G is all about the experience rather than raw power. It does have its shortcomings in some areas when compared to the likes of iQOO Neo 9 Pro and the OnePlus 12R and fails to be a complete package. To make up for it, though, it is solely relying on its software optimisations, features and camera capabilities which might not be enough for the majority, but could still suit some.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 is a true return to form, especially when it comes to device performance. For what seems like the first time, we have a mid-range Galaxy phone with an Exynos chip that is optimized out of the box and will not need months of updates to perform like any phone in its segment should. Battery life is excellent out of the box as well, unlike the Galaxy A54, which had underwhelming endurance at launch. It also addresses complaints some Samsung fans have had for years about its phones not feeling as premium as less costly Chinese devices, with a metal frame and high-quality Gorilla Glass Victus+ surrounding the entire device. It's only the camera setup that feels a little out of place here considering the Galaxy A55's price point.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.03.2024
Quelle: Sam Mobile EN→DE
The Galaxy A55 is a true return to form, especially when it comes to device performance. For what seems like the first time, we have a mid-range Galaxy phone with an Exynos chip that is optimized out of the box and will not need months of updates to perform like any phone in its segment should. Battery life is excellent out of the box as well, unlike the Galaxy A54, which had underwhelming endurance at launch. It also addresses complaints some Samsung fans have had for years about its phones not feeling as premium as less costly Chinese devices, with a metal frame and high-quality Gorilla Glass Victus+ surrounding the entire device. It's only the camera setup that feels a little out of place here considering the Galaxy A55's price point.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.03.2024
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G can be yours at a starting price of Rs 39,999. The handset emerges as a strong contender in the upper mid-range segment, offering value for money for anyone seeking a balance between affordability and functionality. While it may not boast features such as an LTPO display and telephoto lens akin to its competitors – OnePlus 12R (review) and Vivo V30 Pro (review), the A55 5G provides a gratifying user experience. This is attributed to its sturdy IP67-certified design, upgraded Exynos 1480 SoC, long battery life, impressive camera system, and vibrant Super AMOLED display. Furthermore, with a promise of four years of OS upgrades, this phone is set to remain relevant until at least 2028.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 73% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
Okay, this brings me to the conclusion. And yeah, for the starting price of Rs. 62,999, the pricing of the Galaxy A55 is of course a bit on the higher side. But, Samsung Nepal is at least bundling a 25W genuine charger, which is not the case with India. If you look past that, I believe it’s a solid premium mid-range phone, especially if you don’t play competitive games that often. But if performance is what you are aiming for, I think you should definitely wait for the Poco X6 Pro instead which might launch at a much cheaper price tag. It’s a much faster phone and you are going to enjoy most titles at 60 or 90fps without any frame drops. However, If you are someone who prefers Samsung’s brand value, good-looking design with a proper IP rating, on top of reliable everyday experience — be it clicking photos with your friends or just scrolling through the Instagram reels for hours or providing all-day backup, the Galaxy A55 hits a sweet spot in delivering a good overall package.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G can be yours at a starting price of Rs 39,999. The handset emerges as a strong contender in the upper mid-range segment, offering value for money for anyone seeking a balance between affordability and functionality. While it may not boast features such as an LTPO display and telephoto lens akin to its competitors – OnePlus 12R (review) and Vivo V30 Pro (review), the A55 5G provides a gratifying user experience. This is attributed to its sturdy IP67-certified design, upgraded Exynos 1480 SoC, long battery life, impressive camera system, and vibrant Super AMOLED display. Furthermore, with a promise of four years of OS upgrades, this phone is set to remain relevant until at least 2028.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 73% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
Okay, this brings me to the conclusion. And yeah, for the starting price of Rs. 62,999, the pricing of the Galaxy A55 is of course a bit on the higher side. But, Samsung Nepal is at least bundling a 25W genuine charger, which is not the case with India. If you look past that, I believe it’s a solid premium mid-range phone, especially if you don’t play competitive games that often. But if performance is what you are aiming for, I think you should definitely wait for the Poco X6 Pro instead which might launch at a much cheaper price tag. It’s a much faster phone and you are going to enjoy most titles at 60 or 90fps without any frame drops. However, If you are someone who prefers Samsung’s brand value, good-looking design with a proper IP rating, on top of reliable everyday experience — be it clicking photos with your friends or just scrolling through the Instagram reels for hours or providing all-day backup, the Galaxy A55 hits a sweet spot in delivering a good overall package.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Tech Guru Daily EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G smartphone proves you don’t have to spend big money to buy a sleek feature-packed phone. The A55 ticks all the boxes – great design, awesome display, excellent camera and a long-lasting battery. At this price what more can you want.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Tech Guru Daily EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G smartphone proves you don’t have to spend big money to buy a sleek feature-packed phone. The A55 ticks all the boxes – great design, awesome display, excellent camera and a long-lasting battery. At this price what more can you want.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE
So, can the Galaxy A55 5G surpass its predecessor? It’s a close call. Given that the newer Exynos 1480 chipset boasts impressive benchmarks and smoother performance, the camera system remains largely unchanged. On the bright side, the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G offers a compelling package with a gorgeous display, longer battery life, a more refined design, and a consistent software experience. With all the bells and whistles, Galaxy A55 marks a noticeable leap forward for the A-Series. While minor setbacks like uneven bezels and mediocre cameras could see further refinement, this phone excels in core functionalities for the same price as last year’s Galaxy A54 at PHP 24,990 (for the 8GB+256GB trim). Will this phone also become one of the bestsellers this 2024? Only time will tell. It’ll be interesting to see what Samsung brings to the table next.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.03.2024
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE
So, can the Galaxy A55 5G surpass its predecessor? It’s a close call. Given that the newer Exynos 1480 chipset boasts impressive benchmarks and smoother performance, the camera system remains largely unchanged. On the bright side, the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G offers a compelling package with a gorgeous display, longer battery life, a more refined design, and a consistent software experience. With all the bells and whistles, Galaxy A55 marks a noticeable leap forward for the A-Series. While minor setbacks like uneven bezels and mediocre cameras could see further refinement, this phone excels in core functionalities for the same price as last year’s Galaxy A54 at PHP 24,990 (for the 8GB+256GB trim). Will this phone also become one of the bestsellers this 2024? Only time will tell. It’ll be interesting to see what Samsung brings to the table next.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.03.2024
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G display provided an impressive performance for its High-end segment. The device’s screen measured a peak brightness under sunlight conditions of 1638 nits, considerably higher than advertised, and well above its predecessor A54 5G’s 1344 nits. The peak brightness approached the peak level of Samsung’s premium Galaxy S23 model, which was measured at 1600 nits. Our testers saw improvements in how the A55 5G display managed sunlight conditions, particularly in gamma and color. Faces were better rendered, and colors appeared more natural. The A55 5G, like its predecessor as well as other mid-range devices, tended to show pink and green fringes on the display when viewed at an angle. When watching videos, the A55 5G’s screen brightness provides good rendering and a good level of details in dark areas.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.03.2024
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G is one of the latest model in Samsung’s A series and the successor to the A54 5G, which we tested previously. The new model shares some camera hardware specifications with its predecessor, and in our tests, camera performance was on a similar level as well. Overall results were pretty average for this class of device, with accurate exposure and fairly good texture when shooting in decent light conditions. However, in more challenging situations, for example strongly backlit scenes, very low light or scenes with motion, our testers observed a range of failures, including hue shifts around clipped areas, ghosting effects and a noticeable decline of the autofocus tracking capabilities. Surprisingly, our testers found the A55’s bokeh mode to be less accurate, with more subject segmentation errors and activation failures, than on the predecessor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.03.2024
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G display provided an impressive performance for its High-end segment. The device’s screen measured a peak brightness under sunlight conditions of 1638 nits, considerably higher than advertised, and well above its predecessor A54 5G’s 1344 nits. The peak brightness approached the peak level of Samsung’s premium Galaxy S23 model, which was measured at 1600 nits. Our testers saw improvements in how the A55 5G display managed sunlight conditions, particularly in gamma and color. Faces were better rendered, and colors appeared more natural. The A55 5G, like its predecessor as well as other mid-range devices, tended to show pink and green fringes on the display when viewed at an angle. When watching videos, the A55 5G’s screen brightness provides good rendering and a good level of details in dark areas.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.03.2024
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Samsung Galaxy A55 5G is one of the latest model in Samsung’s A series and the successor to the A54 5G, which we tested previously. The new model shares some camera hardware specifications with its predecessor, and in our tests, camera performance was on a similar level as well. Overall results were pretty average for this class of device, with accurate exposure and fairly good texture when shooting in decent light conditions. However, in more challenging situations, for example strongly backlit scenes, very low light or scenes with motion, our testers observed a range of failures, including hue shifts around clipped areas, ghosting effects and a noticeable decline of the autofocus tracking capabilities. Surprisingly, our testers found the A55’s bokeh mode to be less accurate, with more subject segmentation errors and activation failures, than on the predecessor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.03.2024
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
Samsung seems to be in a bit of a pickle with the Galaxy A55 5G. Yes, it included some of AI pazzaz and some improved durability with the metal frame and more durable glass, but it still feels a bit bland when placed next to the competition. Exactly where it fits in its price range will highly depend on its camera performance, which we can't wait to test out. That said, the A5x series from Samsung is one of the most popular and most bought phone models on the market, so there isn't much incentive for the company to make any big changes to it. Sad, but true. There's also the fact that now the A series works with Samsung's Knox security system, which gives users that extra sense of security from any malicious intent. Additionally, the display has improved and we have a slightly different design, but that's about it. Stay tuned for our full review of the Galaxy A55 5G, where you will find more details in the form of test results for the camera, display, as well as the battery life and charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.03.2024
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
Samsung seems to be in a bit of a pickle with the Galaxy A55 5G. Yes, it included some of AI pazzaz and some improved durability with the metal frame and more durable glass, but it still feels a bit bland when placed next to the competition. Exactly where it fits in its price range will highly depend on its camera performance, which we can't wait to test out. That said, the A5x series from Samsung is one of the most popular and most bought phone models on the market, so there isn't much incentive for the company to make any big changes to it. Sad, but true. There's also the fact that now the A series works with Samsung's Knox security system, which gives users that extra sense of security from any malicious intent. Additionally, the display has improved and we have a slightly different design, but that's about it. Stay tuned for our full review of the Galaxy A55 5G, where you will find more details in the form of test results for the camera, display, as well as the battery life and charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.03.2024
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
Samsung seems to be in a bit of trouble with the Galaxy A55. If it doesn't include any of that AI pazzaz that came with the Galaxy S24 series, all it has going for it is longer software support, an upgraded chipset, and a new look. Of course, there is still a lot we don't know about the A55, so there is ample space for surprise to come in and make it a better competitor in the mid-range phone segment, but for now it seems the competition might end up overwhelming this year. Stay tuned as we will be updating this preview with any new information that comes to light, as there is still some time before Samsung's expected announcement of the Galaxy A55 and A35.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.02.2024
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE
Samsung seems to be in a bit of trouble with the Galaxy A55. If it doesn't include any of that AI pazzaz that came with the Galaxy S24 series, all it has going for it is longer software support, an upgraded chipset, and a new look. Of course, there is still a lot we don't know about the A55, so there is ample space for surprise to come in and make it a better competitor in the mid-range phone segment, but for now it seems the competition might end up overwhelming this year. Stay tuned as we will be updating this preview with any new information that comes to light, as there is still some time before Samsung's expected announcement of the Galaxy A55 and A35.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.02.2024
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 88%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 88%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74%
Quelle: Hipertextual ES→DE
Positive: Attractive design; excellent display; high autonomy. Negative: Average performance; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2024
Quelle: Hipertextual ES→DE
Positive: Attractive design; excellent display; high autonomy. Negative: Average performance; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2024
Quelle: PC Guia PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 06.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: PC Guia PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 06.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: Android Geek PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Android Geek PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Showmetech.com.br PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Showmetech.com.br PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 80%
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 80%
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Evo smart IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 69% Preis: 60% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 70%
Quelle: Evo smart IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 69% Preis: 60% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 70%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Ausstattung: 82%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Ausstattung: 82%
Quelle: Smart World IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Smart World IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Preis: 65% Bildschirm: 81% Mobilität: 89% Gehäuse: 83%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Preis: 65% Bildschirm: 81% Mobilität: 89% Gehäuse: 83%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Positive: Attractive price; nice performance; excellent battery life; good cameras. Negative: Mediocre design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.04.2024
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Positive: Attractive price; nice performance; excellent battery life; good cameras. Negative: Mediocre design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.04.2024
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android MT FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.09.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 90% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android MT FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.09.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 90% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Les Mobiles FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Les Mobiles FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Clubic FR→DE
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Presse Citron FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 71% Preis: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 95%
Quelle: Clubic FR→DE
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Presse Citron FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 71% Preis: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 95%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Journal du Geek FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Journal du Geek FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: 01Net FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: 01Net FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Presse Citron FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 71% Preis: 70% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 95%
Quelle: Presse Citron FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 71% Preis: 70% Bildschirm: 95% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 95%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Nerd-mobile FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Nerd-mobile FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Mobileworld 24 PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.09.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Preis: 65% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 81% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 81%
Quelle: Mobileworld 24 PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.09.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Preis: 65% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 81% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 81%
Quelle: ITHardware.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.08.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: ITHardware.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.08.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77%
Quelle: m GSM PL→DE
Positive: Premium design; great built quality; beautiful AMOLED display; waterproof IP67; high performance; nice cameras; both dual SIM and MicroSD card slot; stereo speakers. Negative: No charger included; thick frames; slow charging; inflexible fingerprint sensor; poor night photography.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.09.2024
Quelle: m GSM PL→DE
Positive: Premium design; great built quality; beautiful AMOLED display; waterproof IP67; high performance; nice cameras; both dual SIM and MicroSD card slot; stereo speakers. Negative: No charger included; thick frames; slow charging; inflexible fingerprint sensor; poor night photography.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.09.2024
Quelle: Instalki PL→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; waterproof IP67; support 5G; long battery life; decent performance; nice cameras; stereo speakers; microSD card slot. Negative: No charger included; no telephoto lens; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.07.2024
Quelle: Instalki PL→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; waterproof IP67; support 5G; long battery life; decent performance; nice cameras; stereo speakers; microSD card slot. Negative: No charger included; no telephoto lens; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.07.2024
Quelle: PurePC PL→DE
Positive: Great AMOLED display; premium design; metal case; waterproof IP67; powerful processor; very long battery life; nice cameras; microSD card slot; stereo speakers. Negative: Slow 25W charging; no charger included; heavy and bulky; thick frames; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.04.2024
Quelle: PurePC PL→DE
Positive: Great AMOLED display; premium design; metal case; waterproof IP67; powerful processor; very long battery life; nice cameras; microSD card slot; stereo speakers. Negative: Slow 25W charging; no charger included; heavy and bulky; thick frames; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.04.2024
Quelle: GSM Online PL→DE
Positive: Great built quality; 4K video recording; elegant design. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.04.2024
Quelle: GSM Online PL→DE
Positive: Great built quality; 4K video recording; elegant design. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.04.2024
Quelle: Orange PL PL→DE
Positive: High performance; decent AMOLED display; stereo speakers; powerful processor; large storage; microSD card slot. Negative: Poor cameras; slow charging; no charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.03.2024
Quelle: Orange PL PL→DE
Positive: High performance; decent AMOLED display; stereo speakers; powerful processor; large storage; microSD card slot. Negative: Poor cameras; slow charging; no charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.03.2024
Quelle: Unite4buy PL→DE
Positive: Nice triple cameras; beautiful AMOLED display; good hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.03.2024
Quelle: Unite4buy PL→DE
Positive: Nice triple cameras; beautiful AMOLED display; good hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.03.2024
Quelle: DGL.ru RU→DE
Positive: Bright display; elegant design; metal case; long battery life; nice cameras; waterproof IP67. Negative: No charger included; average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.03.2024
Quelle: DGL.ru RU→DE
Positive: Bright display; elegant design; metal case; long battery life; nice cameras; waterproof IP67. Negative: No charger included; average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.03.2024
Quelle: MobilArena HU HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.04.2024
Bewertung: Preis: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: MobilArena HU HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.04.2024
Bewertung: Preis: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 83% Ausstattung: 81% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 83% Ausstattung: 81% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: CNews.cz CZ→DE
Positive: Support eSIM; powerful processor; excellent cameras. Negative: Slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.06.2024
Quelle: CNews.cz CZ→DE
Positive: Support eSIM; powerful processor; excellent cameras. Negative: Slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.06.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; good Night Portrait; waterproof ỊP67; flexible Circle to Search mode.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.10.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; good Night Portrait; waterproof ỊP67; flexible Circle to Search mode.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.10.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; impressive AI functions; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.10.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; impressive AI functions; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.10.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; beautiful display; nice performance; great cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.06.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; beautiful display; nice performance; great cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.06.2024
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Metal case; decent performance; support 5G; attractive price. Negative: Mediocre design; thick frames.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.05.2024
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Metal case; decent performance; support 5G; attractive price. Negative: Mediocre design; thick frames.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.05.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; elegant design; decent hardware; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.05.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; elegant design; decent hardware; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.05.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; great cameras; high performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 08.05.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; great cameras; high performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 08.05.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; excellent AI cameras; high security; powerful processor; high gaming performance; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.05.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; excellent cameras; high performance; good security.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.05.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; excellent AI cameras; high security; powerful processor; high gaming performance; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.05.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; excellent cameras; high performance; good security.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.05.2024
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Affordable price; beautiful design; great built quality; nice performance.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; high performance; great display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; high performance; great display; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.04.2024
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Affordable price; beautiful design; great built quality; nice performance.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; high performance; great display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; high performance; great display; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.04.2024
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; powerful hardware; high performance; nice cameras; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.04.2024
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; powerful hardware; high performance; nice cameras; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.04.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; nice cameras; attractive price.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.04.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; nice cameras; attractive price.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.04.2024
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Good price; simple design; nice cameras.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; high performance; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.04.2024
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Good price; simple design; nice cameras.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; high performance; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Decent hardware; nice gaming performance; excellent display; large battery capacity; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Decent hardware; nice gaming performance; excellent display; large battery capacity; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2024
Quelle: Tinh Te VN→DE
Positive: Good price; elegant design; nice performance; decent cameras.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2024
Quelle: XT Mobile VN→DE
Positive: Decent gaming performance; good cooling system; high security.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2024
Quelle: Tinh Te VN→DE
Positive: Good price; elegant design; nice performance; decent cameras.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2024
Quelle: XT Mobile VN→DE
Positive: Decent gaming performance; good cooling system; high security.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; metal case; decent processor; nice performance; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 29.03.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; metal case; decent processor; nice performance; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 29.03.2024
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; nice performance; excellent cameras; high security; waterproof IP67.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.03.2024
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; nice performance; excellent cameras; high security; waterproof IP67.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.03.2024
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; excellent display; beautiful design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.03.2024
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; excellent display; beautiful design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.03.2024
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Metal case; powerful processor; nice gaming performance; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.03.2024
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Impressive battery life; decent processor; nice performance; metal case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2024
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Metal case; powerful processor; nice gaming performance; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.03.2024
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Impressive battery life; decent processor; nice performance; metal case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; solid workmanship; beautiful AMOLED display; nice cameras; high performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.03.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; solid workmanship; beautiful AMOLED display; nice cameras; high performance; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.03.2024
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; nice AI cameras; powerful hardware; high security.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.03.2024
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Attractive price; nice AI cameras; powerful hardware; high security.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.03.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; metal case; solid workmanship; excellent cameras; powerful processor; high performance; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.03.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; metal case; solid workmanship; excellent cameras; powerful processor; high performance; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.03.2024
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Metal case; waterproof IP67; powerful processor; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2024
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Metal case; waterproof IP67; powerful processor; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2024
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; solid workmanship; metal case; powerful processor; affordable price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.03.2024
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; solid workmanship; metal case; powerful processor; affordable price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.03.2024
Quelle: Root Nation CN zh-CN→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 93% Preis: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: Root Nation CN zh-CN→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 93% Preis: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 12.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 12.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 07.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 07.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 07.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 07.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Mere Mobil.dk DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 67%
Quelle: Mere Mobil.dk DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 67%
Quelle: Mere Mobil.dk DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 67%
Quelle: Mere Mobil.dk DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 67%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Bildschirm: 80%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Bildschirm: 80%
Quelle: M3 PC för alla SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: M3 PC för alla SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Itsvet HR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73%
Quelle: Itsvet HR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73%
Quelle: Mobile-com JP JA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.09.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Mobile-com JP JA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.09.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Arena IT →DE
Positive: High performance; affordable price; modern design.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.04.2024
Quelle: Arena IT →DE
Positive: High performance; affordable price; modern design.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.04.2024
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE
Positive: Premium design; powerful processor; decent cameras; nice display; good autonomy. Negative: Average performance; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.04.2024
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE
Positive: Premium design; powerful processor; decent cameras; nice display; good autonomy. Negative: Average performance; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.04.2024
Kommentar
Samsung: Die Samsung Group ist der größte südkoreanische Mischkonzern und wurde 1938 gegründet. In der Samsung-Gruppe waren 2014 489.000 Menschen beschäftigt, und sie gehört zu den weltweit größten Unternehmen gemessen an Umsatz und Marktstärke. Der Name Samsung bedeutet im Koreanischen "Drei Sterne" und repräsentiert die drei Söhne des Firmengründers. Das Unternehmen wurde 1938 als Lebensmittelladen gegründet. Mit der 1969 gegründeten Tochter Samsung Electronics nahm Samsung die Fertigung elektrotechnischer Artikel in Angriff, wobei man sich frühzeitig auf Unterhaltungselektronik und Haushaltsgeräte konzentrierte. Weitere Zweige, in denen der Großkonzern tätig ist, sind Maschinenbau, Automobile (Hyundai), Versicherung, Großhandel, Immobilien und Freizeit. Samsung stellt eine breite Palette von elektronischen Produkten her, darunter Smartphones, Fernsehgeräte, Haushaltsgeräte und Halbleiter. Die Galaxy-Smartphone-Reihe des Unternehmens ist eine der beliebtesten der Welt. Samsung ist auch ein wichtiger Akteur in der Halbleiterindustrie und stellt Speicherchips und Prozessoren für viele andere Elektronikhersteller her.
Einige nicht anspruchsvolle aktuelle Spiele können mit geringen Details noch flüssig gespielt werden. Für Office und Video natürlich ausreichende Leistungsreserven.
ARM Mali-G72 MP3: Integrierte Grafikkarte (z.b. im Mediatek Helio P60 mit 800 MHz) mit 3 Kernen / Clustern.
Qualcomm Adreno 642L: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC. Laut Qualcomm um 40% schneller als die alte Adreno 620 im Snapdragon 768G.
Samsung Xclipse 530: Integrierte GPU im Exynos 1480 SoC und wahrscheinlich basierend auf die AMD RDNA 2 Architektur (wie die ältere Xclipse 920).
3D Spiele sind auf diesen Vertretern nur in Ausnahmen spielbar, grundsätzlich sind die Grafiklösungen hierfür jedoch nicht geeignet. Office Programme und Internet surfen dürfte jedoch ohne Problem möglich sein.
unknown:
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
Samsung Exynos:
Exynos 9610: Mittelklasse-SoC welcher 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster enthält: 4 Cortex-A73-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,7 GHz.
Exynos 9611: Mittelklasse-SoC welcher 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster enthält: 4 Cortex-A73-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,7 GHz.
Exynos 1480: Mittelkasse SoC mit vier ARM Cortex-A55 (max. 2 GHz) im Effizienzcluster und vier ARM Cortex-A78 (max. 2,8 GHz) im Performancecluster. Die integrierte NPU soll viermal so schnell sein wie beim Vorgänger und auch das integrierte 5G Modem wurde deutlich schneller.
:
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
SD 778G 5G: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo 670 Kernen (4x ARM Cortex A78 2,4 GHz Prime Core und 4x ARM Cortex-A55 1,8 GHz) und einem X53 5G Modem (bis zu 3300 Mbps Download). Der Chip wird im modernen 6nm EUV Prozess bei TSMC gefertigt.
» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.
0.166 kg:
Most smartphones and only a few tablets fall into this weight category. Only a few smartphones are heavier and should rather be considered tablets.
0.213 kg:
79%: Weltbewegend ist diese Bewertung nicht. Diese Bewertung muss man eigentlich als unterdurchschnittlich ansehen, denn es gibt etwa ebenso mehr Geräte mit schlechtere Beurteilungen als Besseren. Eine Kaufempfehlung kann man nur mit viel Wohlwollen darin sehen, es sei denn es handelt sich um Websites, die generell streng urteilen.
» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.