Samsung Galaxy A50s
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0, 25mm
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 9 Bewertungen (aus 47 Tests)
Testberichte für das Samsung Galaxy A50s
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE Archive.org version
In conclusion, if you are keen on owning a smartphone with a camera that is comparable to a flagship smartphone, you might want to consider the Samsung Galaxy A50s. This is due to the fact that it only costs RM1299 and it comes with various features typically found on higher-end devices.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.01.2020
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is not a bad phone. The camera is pleasing, the battery life is good enough, and this is an excellent AMOLED display. The performance is good enough for regular usage, but it does struggle if you are those who do a lot of heavy gaming. For the Galaxy A50s, competition like Redmi K20, Nokia 7.2 will make it harder to stand out.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: NLT EN→DE Archive.org version
Overall, for RM1,299, the Galaxy A50s has a higher price tag compared to other mid-range smartphones in the market, but it offers a better software experience and ecosystem compared to other brands.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Preis: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Think Digit EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50s isn’t the best performer in the upper mid-range segment, but if you are looking for a phone that looks good and handy to use, the A50s is a good option to consider. It also comes with a reliable camera system. The primary 48MP camera is optimised to shoot well-detailed, vibrant images in the day, but not much useful once the sun sets. OneUI based on Android 9 also goes a long way in making the Galaxy A50s highly usable with a lot of features borrowed from the flagship S-series, but keep in mind that if gaming is what you are after in a phone, this is not the best option.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Preis: 94% Leistung: 66% Gehäuse: 62%
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE Archive.org version
The A50s slips very neatly into the Rs 20,000-25,000 price segment where there is actually very limited competition (the Redmi K20 is the only significant new device there). Given its performance and pricing, and, of course, its considerable brand equity, Samsung could have another bestseller on its hands here.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: The Techy EN→DE Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A50s is a fairly good effort by smartphone manufacturer in a segment that is highly competitive. The performance is flawless including gaming. However, we weren’t impressed with the slow fingerprint sensor. Those who love shooting pictures, they are likely to find the device valuable.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Leistung: 85% Gehäuse: 75% Ergonomie: 75%
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
As it stands, the Galaxy A50s is an incremental upgrade of the original A50 with improved front and rear cameras and modest firmware updates that offer more flagship type features. It’s a solid all-rounder, with a good Super AMOLED display, decent overall performance and an otherwise good set of cameras for day-to-day use though at this competitive price category it’s a bit on the pricey side. That extra premium however goes towards the polish and deep integration of the Galaxy A50’s myriad user interface and design including Samsung Pay that other brands have yet to match.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: India Today EN→DE Archive.org version
On its own, the Galaxy A50s is a pretty attractive phone, but largely similar to the Galaxy A50. It comes with a sleek and lightweight design and a stunning AMOLED display, much like its predecessor. The performance is good enough for day-to-day usage and it delivers a full day battery life as well. Cameras have been upgraded and are better compared to the Galaxy A50. That being said, I feel the upgrades are not drastic enough from the Galaxy A50.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE Archive.org version
For a small price bump, you’re also getting a small spec bump. While there’s nothing wrong with the Galaxy A50s, we feel like this could’ve been the Galaxy A50 in the first place. Now that Realme 5 Pro and Redmi Note 8 Pro are on the market and have way cheaper price tags, this makes the A50s hard to recommend. Samsung is now back to square one when it comes to its mid-range smartphones.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.10.2019
Quelle: Mobygyaan EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a decent smartphone for the starting price of ₹22,999. It features good-looking design, packs a decent set of internals and offers a good battery life. However, the phone lacks behind in crucial departments for its asking price — camera and performance. The Galaxy A50s is a good effort from the South Korean giant but it still is not the answer against Chinese offerings. Compared to this, the Realme XT, Xiaomi Redmi K20, and the Vivo Z1x seem better, both in terms of specs and pricing. However, if you are interested in buying Galaxy A50s, you can purchase it through Flipkart.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.10.2019
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50s seems like a reasonable mid-range smartphone on paper. It has almost everything one could want, including a multi-camera setup on the back, a relatively high-resolution AMOLED display, decent storage options, and a sizable battery capacity. It even has a headphone jack.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.10.2019
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE Archive.org version
The Galaxy A50s with 4,000mAh battery, 48MP main shooter, and the price tag of Rs 24,999 for 6GB + 128GB version (Rs 22, 999 for 4GB + 128GB) is a considerable offering in the mid-range segment but faces a tough competition from rivals. The smartphone looks impressive, and scores well on several parameters, especially performance. The camera may not impress too much, but does a fine job otherwise. Overall, we had a good experience with the phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.09.2019
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
As far as specifications and the overall usage experience go, there isn't much difference at all between the Galaxy A50s and its predecessor, the Galaxy A50 (Review). There's nothing groundbreaking here, and nothing that really stands out for a sub-Rs. 25,000 phone today. That said, everything works well enough, and both the hardware and software feel highly polished.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.09.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE Archive.org version
Overall, the A50s is solid mid-ranger with a bright display, modest battery life, the latest One UI, and better camera hardware. The chipset benchmarks gave us mixed results, and there were a couple of frame drops during gaming, but apart from that, we think it’s a decent upgrade from the A50. Samsung has the A50s priced at PHP 18,990, which is just a couple of thousand pesos more than its predecessor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.09.2019
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
Externally, the Galaxy A30s and Galaxy A50s look quite similar to each other with a design that’s almost a spitting image of each other including a nigh identically sized 6.4-inch display but they vary substantially in almost every detail with the Galaxy A50s packing better hardware. In general, both phones also notably come with under-display fingerprint readers, triple rear camera arrays, 15W fast charging, 4,000mAh sized batteries and Samsung Pay support.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.09.2019
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is probably one of the most 'hatke' designed smartphones from Samsung. Some might instantly feel attracted to its design and some might be confused with it. The display to the point, though the camera performance in low light seems to be an issue here. Overall, if you ask for the competition, it will go against the likes of Xiaomi Redmi K20, Vivo V15 Pro and more.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.09.2019
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
At a starting price of Rs. 22,999, the Galaxy A50s goes head-on with some well-received phones such as Redmi K20 (Review), Poco F1 (Review), and the Vivo V15 Pro (Review), to name a few. The overall package is a little underwhelming for the asking price, but we'll reserve the final verdict for our review as we extensively test the cameras, day-to-day performance, and battery life. Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 for our Galaxy A50s review arriving soon.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.09.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: The Guardian EN→DE Archive.org version
Nếu nhìn bề ngoài thì có vẻ như Galaxy A50s không khác biệt là mấy so với Galaxy A50 vẫn là chất liệu nhựa giả kính sang trọng. Mặt trước vẫn là màn hình Infinity-U trên tấm nền Super AMOLED 6.4 inch với độ phân giải 1.080×2.340 px.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.08.2019
Quelle: Mega Obzor RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice cameras; elegant design; excellent display; powerful processor; high auonomy; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.01.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice cameras; beautiful display; good price; decent performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.03.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice performance; great cameras; excellent display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.11.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; modern design; nice performance; long battery life; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.11.2019
Quelle: XT Mobile VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; slim size; light weight; bright display; nice performance; great cameras; decent autonomy; good price. Negative: Slow fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.11.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Large battery capacity; quick charging; stylish design; big screen; nice display; good hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.11.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; nice triple cameras; high performance; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.11.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive autonomy; infinity display; beautiful design; decent hardware; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.10.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; nice triple cameras; frameless design; great display; fast fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.10.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; nice triple cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.10.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; nice triple cameras; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.10.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; stylish design; frameless display; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.10.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; good display; great performance; excellent cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.10.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Great triple cameras; beautiful design; nice display; high performance; fast charging; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.10.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; stylish design; good display; decent performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.10.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; excellent AMOLED display; nice cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.09.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; great cameras; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.09.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; elegant design; nice cameras; fast charging; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.09.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; beautiful design; high performance; long battery life; quick charging; nice design; excellent cameras.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.09.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; great cameras; decent hardware; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.09.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; impressive cameras; high performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.09.2019
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice display; great triple cameras; powerful hardware; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.09.2019
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; fast fingerprint sensor; powerful hardware; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.09.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern cameras; stylish design; attractive price; slim size; nice cameras; decent autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.09.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Large screen; impressive cameras; elegant design; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.09.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; fast charging; nice triple cameras; infinity display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.09.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; solid workmanship; excellent display; big screen; nice triple cameras; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.09.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; nice cameras; decent hardware; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.09.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice triple cameras; stylish design; high performance; long battery life; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.09.2019
Kommentar
ARM Mali-G72 MP3: Integrierte Grafikkarte (z.b. im Mediatek Helio P60 mit 800 MHz) mit 3 Kernen / Clustern.
Einige nicht anspruchsvolle aktuelle Spiele können mit geringen Details noch flüssig gespielt werden. Für Office und Video natürlich ausreichende Leistungsreserven.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
Exynos 9610: Mittelklasse-SoC welcher 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster enthält: 4 Cortex-A73-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,7 GHz.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
6.40": Es handelt sich um ein kleines Display-Format für Smartphones. Man sollte nicht stark fehlsichtig sein und man wird wenig Details am Bildschirm sehen und nur eine kleine Auflösung zur Verfügung haben. Dafür sollte das Gerät klein und handlich sein, gut transportierbar.» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.
0.169 kg:
In diese Gewichtsklasse fallen die meisten Smartphones und nur vereinzelt Tablets. Nur wenige Smartphones sind schwerer und eher als Tablets anzusehen.
Samsung: Die Samsung Group ist der größte südkoreanische Mischkonzern und wurde 1938 gegründet. In der Samsung-Gruppe waren 2014 489.000 Menschen beschäftigt, und sie gehört zu den weltweit größten Unternehmen gemessen an Umsatz und Marktstärke. Der Name Samsung bedeutet im Koreanischen "Drei Sterne" und repräsentiert die drei Söhne des Firmengründers. Das Unternehmen wurde 1938 als Lebensmittelladen gegründet. Mit der 1969 gegründeten Tochter Samsung Electronics nahm Samsung die Fertigung elektrotechnischer Artikel in Angriff, wobei man sich frühzeitig auf Unterhaltungselektronik und Haushaltsgeräte konzentrierte. Weitere Zweige, in denen der Großkonzern tätig ist, sind Maschinenbau, Automobile (Hyundai), Versicherung, Großhandel, Immobilien und Freizeit. Samsung stellt eine breite Palette von elektronischen Produkten her, darunter Smartphones, Fernsehgeräte, Haushaltsgeräte und Halbleiter. Die Galaxy-Smartphone-Reihe des Unternehmens ist eine der beliebtesten der Welt. Samsung ist auch ein wichtiger Akteur in der Halbleiterindustrie und stellt Speicherchips und Prozessoren für viele andere Elektronikhersteller her.
74.89%: Diese Bewertung ist schlecht. Locker drei Viertel der Modelle werden besser beurteilt. Das ist eher keine Kaufempfehlung. Auch wenn Verbalbewertungen in diesem Bereich gar nicht so schlecht klingen ("genügend" oder "befriedigend"), meist sind es Euphemismen, die eine Klassifikation als unterdurchschnittliches Notebook verschleiern.
» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.