ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Under-display camera
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 18 Bewertungen (aus 28 Tests)
Testberichte für das ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Das Axon 40 Ultra ist anders. Die Selfiekamera steckt bei ZTEs neuem Flaggschiff unter dem Display. Zudem sitzen auf dem Glas-Backcover gleich drei 64-MP-Kameras, inklusive einer Telelinse mit optischem 3,5-fach-Zoom. Die übrigen Highend-Komponenten wie das 120-Hz-AMOLED-Display und der Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 lesen sich da schon fast langweilig.
Quelle: Go2 Mobile
Das ZTE Axon 40 Ultra ist ein Flaggschiff-Smartphone das mit seinem Preis von 830 Euro allein schon auffällt. Gespart wurde lediglich an kabellosen Laden und einer IP-Zertifizierung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Preis: 95% Leistung: 85% Mobilität: 92% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Hervorzuheben gegenüber der Konkurrenz ist natürlich das Notch-freie Display und die Hauptkamera mit 35 Millimeter Festbrennweite.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition smartphone doesn’t come with any major improvement and everything is as it is as the Axon 40 Ultra. The primary difference would be the new design layout and fast charging speed. But if you are looking for something unique from the ZTE in the flagship range, you should purchase this phone right away. Although, the phone is currently exclusive to the china market only. Aside from this, there are tons of other value-of-money options that come this year. Therefore, we would recommend you go with alternative options such as Google Pixel 7 Pro which renders the best features and is offered at almost the same price. But the final decision is in your hand, so pick the device according to your wish wisely.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.12.2022
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition was launched in December 2022 at the price of $810 (Rs 66,999 in India) approx. The smartphone comes with 5G connectivity and equips 6.8 inches AMOLED display panel with a 120Hz refresh rate and 1500 nits peak brightness. For software, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition runs on the Android 12 OS and MyOS 12 user interface. Besides this, you will receive flagship performance with the 4nm Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset integrated with Adreno 730 GPU support. You can purchase this device in 12GB / 18GB RAM with 512GB / 1TB internal storage option, while support for SD card is missing on the smartphone. As for photography, the Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition on the rear packs a true 64MP triple camera setup that can record 8K videos at 30fps. Aside from this, you are offered a 16MP under-display selfie camera at the front for video calls. Besides this, the smartphone carries necessary comms and sensors while an under-display fingerprint scanner is also present for biometric authentication. The smartphone has a massive Li-Po 5000 mAh battery with 80W fast charging support. You can pick this device in a single Black color only.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.12.2022
Quelle: Android Headlines EN→DE
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra gets a lot of things right. Stellar hardware design, uninterrupted and curved 6.8-inch AMOLED display, a large 5,000 mAh battery, loud stereo speakers, and great rear cameras. Not to mention USA availability and out-of-the-box 5G support. In addition, it has a clean software experience with zero bloatware and 65W fast charging support. With the Ultra moniker in the branding and improved hardware along with the curved uninterrupted display, the price is $799 for the base version. So if you want a unique-looking device and are not into selfies then the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra makes sense. But if selfies are important to you then for about the same price you can get the Samsung Galaxy S22 or for a bit more get the Google Pixel 6 Pro with a small cutout and a large curved 4K AMOLED display. And outside the USA you can look at plenty of devices from Xiaomi and Oppo/Vivo to compare against before settling on a smartphone of your choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.08.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE
It's sleek, it's upscale, it's fast. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra packs some powerful hardware, kept in check by a dedicated cooling system. You'll enjoy that edge-to-edge 120Hz AMOLED panel with an invisible front camera under the screen. Weirdly, it also skips some of the most popular features that define a flagship: waterproofing, wireless charging, and consistently great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Phandroid EN→DE
Priced at $799, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has quite a bit of competition, especially from more mainstream brands such as Samsung. But overall, it is a solid performer with clean-looking software and near-stock Android experience. The curved display is excellent if you watch a lot of videos and play a lot of games, and we can appreciate the future forward design of an in-display camera. The only downside are its cameras that would have otherwise made this phone truly amazing.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra smartphone is a decent flagship smartphone that offers proper performance, decent battery life, and an industry-leading display. Besides this, you will attain an impeccable gaming experience with a smooth user interface. So, overall, it’s worth your money and time. But still, there’s no denying that the market offers several alternative options too. If you are looking for all-rounder specs with faster android updates, we will recommend you to go with the Pixel 6 Pro for impressive camera quality, while the Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus comes out to be a great choice with 4 years of Android and security updates.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.07.2022
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE
If it didn't have the under-display camera, the Axon 40 Ultra would be easy to confidently back as a flagship alternative for users who didn't want just another Samsung Galaxy or Google Pixel. But since it does have that unusual selfie shooter, it makes judging the phone's overall quality and ideal buyer tricky. The low price of the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra makes it easy to choose if your budget can't stretch to a Galaxy S22 Ultra, thanks to the Axon’s 64MP cameras and 65W charging. But the front camera can be very important to users for selfies or video calls, so the quality of the under-display camera could be a deal breaker, even at this price. I'd recommend the Axon 40 Ultra to anyone who wants the maximum amount of phone for less than $800 and feels like the similarly priced iPhone 13 or Galaxy S22 don’t offer quite enough. If you're prepared to spend the money needed to get a Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra or iPhone 13 Pro Max, you're probably going to get a better-rounded experience with those phones. If you're determined to stick to a £700 - £800 budget though, the most interesting comparison for the Axon 40 Ultra is....
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The Axon 40 Ultra gets most of the basics right, delivering a high-powered, long-lasting smartphone that tops up in under an hour. The addition of versatile rear cameras and that full-screen experience enabled by a stealthy under-display selfie camera means you’ve got an intriguing yet capable proposition at a very reasonable asking price. However, it’s clear that there are a few gaps in the Axon 40 Ultra’s armor, starting with those disappointing selfies. Even at a more affordable flagship price, just shy of $800 is a tough ask for a phone that lacks an IP rating, wireless charging, and a long-term update pledge. There are a few alternatives on the market that come in at the same price or undercut the ZTE device while offering these extras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Laptop Mag EN→DE
Yes, the selfie camera is pants, but I’m a sucker for value for money. That is what the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra offers in a strong Android flagship packed with powerful specs, good battery life and decent rear cameras. Hiding the front-facing snapper under the screen has become an artform for ZTE now,; it is one of the best at making it an invisible, un-disturbed rectangle of AMOLED goodness. All-in-all, if you can work around its pitfalls, this is a decent phone that is pitted against stiff competition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a good phone, but it just falls short of being a great one. The screen is excellent, the battery life very good, and performance levels are outstanding, too. However, the rear camera is decent without being exceptional, and the under-screen selfie camera is genuinely terrible, despite (or probably because of) its innovative design. If mobile photography is one of your priorities, then you’d be better off checking out a device such as the Pixel 6.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Mobile Syrup EN→DE
Every year it feels increasingly strange that ZTE continues to try to compete at the near flagship level. Its OS is getting better, but it’s still incomplete and filled with random software instead of a smooth experience. Considering the battery issues I faced last year, I wasn’t expecting great hardware this year, but the Axon 40 Ultra feels great in my hand. The screen could be better, but overall it’s passable. The camera is pretty fun, and I love that 35mm focal length for photography. I’d like to see more companies adopt something similar in the future. The under-display camera, on the other hand, is terrible and ZTE should probably give that up. You can pre-order the phone from ZTE for $799 USD (roughly $1,000 CAD).
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.06.2022
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
If you’re not a selfie fan and you love the idea of an interrupted display with a few extra pixels of usable space, then sure. It’s not a perfect phone, but you can expect strong specs and a solid rear camera setup to back up that unique viewing experience. In case I didn’t make it clear earlier though, anyone who expects to get much use of out of the front camera should really look elsewhere. This tech is impressive, and this is the best it’s been yet, but there’s still work to be done. In practice, this isn’t the phone for you if you ever choose to use your selfie shooter.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Mobile Tech Review
ZTE’s 2022 flagship Android 12 phone, the Axon 40 Ultra, leans heavy on the ultra specs: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor, triple rear 64MP cameras including a periscope telephoto, a 120Hz 6.8” AMOLED display with under display selfie camera and fingerprint scanner, and 5G. It goes on sale globally.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.06.2022
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
Another year, another Axon Ultra is challenging the established ways of doing smartphone cameras. The signs were there last year, but we may have overlooked them - now, ZTE has abandoned caution and has gone for a 35mm primary camera. And we can't say we're not fans. 35mm smartphone cameras from the early days were limited, but there were no ultrawides back then - today, there's always the zoom-out button for when stepping back isn't possible. And the Axon's main camera, thanks to its unusual specs, opens up possibilities you don't get anywhere else or not to that extent - mostly in real, actual lens blur, but also perspective. The Axon's other two cameras are properly good too, especially during the day, but not too shabby in the dark either. It's only in certain aspects of video recording that we saw missteps, but judging by the rate of updates we've been getting, they should be addressed sooner rather than later. There'll be no fix for the under-display selfie camera whose biggest virtue is its invisibility - certainly not its image quality.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: XDA Developers EN→DE
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a phone with a lot of compromises, but it’s aimed at a very specific type of user. If you don’t care about the selfie camera, it’s probably already high up on your list thanks to that stellar display. Coming in at €829 though, it’s a pretty tall ask when there are smartphones with a lot of the same features and better cameras for a lot cheaper. For example, in Europe, you can save €80 and get the Realme GT 2 Pro, a phone that honestly offers a lot more. You get a longer support window, much better cameras, the same charging speed, better software, and a much nicer QHD+ LTPO display. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra’s best selling point is the display, but even that a lot of people likely won’t care about and falters behind the display tech of a cheaper phone. A friend of mine saw the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and thought it was cool, but pointed out that the front-facing camera on their phone doesn’t bother them because it’s in the center of the status bar anyway. To be honest, I completely see where they’re coming from.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.06.2022
Quelle: TechTablets
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.06.2022
Quelle: G Style Magazine EN→DE
ZTE might not be a brand you’re familiar with here in the U.S., but they’re pretty well known globally. It’s a shame that we actually don’t have more devices here to choose from other than your usually Apple or Samsung phones, which pretty much dominate here. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra really is a great device that has a lot going for it in terms of specs and usability. The cameras for the most part are fantastic and the display is gorgeous even though it’s only FHD+. The under-display front camera is very well hidden and really does make the display look that much better. The only thing I’d really ding the phone is the lack of waterproofing or dust proofing certifications and that the glass isn’t Gorilla Glass or equivalent. Also so lackluster selfie cam quality. However, I’m able to turn a blind eye to some of its shortcomings mainly because the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra will retail at an astonishing $799 globally, in this configuration, when it is released on June 21, 2022. That undercuts many of today’s flagships. Not only that. It still comes with a charger!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.06.2022
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE
The OnePlus 10 Pro ($899) might be another device you should consider in lieu of the Axon 40 Ultra. It doesn’t have an under-display selfie camera and costs $100 more, but you’re getting perks like wireless charging, a good primary camera, a superior screen, and three years of OS updates. It also shares a few of the Axon 40 Ultra’s strengths such as battery life, fast charging, and the same powerful processor, though it’s a little rough around the edges due to the similarly lacking IP rating (unless you buy from T-Mobile), mediocre supporting cameras, and some software inconsistencies. You should also keep the iPhone 13 ($799) in mind if you’re open to joining the Apple ecosystem. It lacks a high refresh rate screen, has a massive notch, lacks a telephoto camera, and misses out on fast charging (and the charger). However, Apple’s phone also brings a powerful processor, IP68 rating, wireless charging, and access to an exclusive ecosystem.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Talk Android EN→DE
I’m impressed enough with the design of the Axon 40 Ultra that I’d recommend the phone on that alone. The material, shape, and notch-less screen are big enough selling points on their own that make the phone very pleasant to use. The Snapdragon muscle and great battery life are the cherry on top. It’s not a perfect phone, though, with a camera that lags behind the competition and an update policy that doesn’t have the track record of what you’ll get from a Samsung phone. But even with those complaints, it’s one of the most appealing phones I’ve reviewed in a while, and anyone that’s looking for a well designed phone could do much worse than what ZTE’s got on offer. If you’re interested in jumping on the Axon 40 Ultra early, ZTE is offering a promotion where you can put down a $1.99 pre-order to knock $50 off the phone’s $799 list price. That entry model is the 128/8GB variant, but ZTE is offering a some steps up if you need more.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.06.2022
Quelle: Zdnet.com EN→DE
The Axon 40 Ultra will be available for purchase in North America starting June 21. At $799, the handset undercuts every 2022 flagship, including that of Samsung, Google, Apple, and OnePlus. For all the high-end specs you're getting, along with a matured under-display camera, ZTE has quite the value offering on its hands. Stay tuned for the rest of the review as I further test the performance and battery life of the device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.06.2022
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is the latest flagship 5G smartphone launched in May 2022 at the expected price of $743 (Rs 57,590 in India) approx. As for the primary specs, let’s start with the 6.8-inches AMOLED display panel, 1500 nits peak brightness, and impressive 144Hz refresh rate. Apart from this, you will also receive a 16MP selfie camera hidden under the display. For the main camera, the back panel offers a triple camera setup that introduces a 64MP standard, 64MP periscope telephoto, and a 64MP ultrawide lens for next-level photography. On the other hand, you can record 8K videos at 30fps with gyro-EIS support from the main camera. As for the storage, you will have 8GB/12GB/16GB RAM option with 256GB/ 512GB /1TB internal storage. The device runs on the latest Android 12 OS with MyOS 12 user interface. For gaming and performance, the flagship 4nm – Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and Adreno 730 GPU back the phone. For security, the device offers an under-display fingerprint sensor. The phone has a Li-Po 5000 mAh with an 80W fast charging support.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.05.2022
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Ausstattung: 100% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 100%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 88% Bildschirm: 88% Mobilität: 83% Gehäuse: 93%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Preis: 69% Bildschirm: 86% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.06.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Ausstattung: 73%
Quelle: Les Mobiles FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.07.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Kommentar
Modell:
Das neueste Smartphone auf dem Markt ist kein anderes als das ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. Was das Design betrifft, so fühlt sich die glatte, matte Glasrückseite glatt an, und der gebogene Bildschirm sorgt für ein sehr angenehmes Erlebnis in der Hand trotz seiner Größe. Darüber hinaus ist es erwähnenswert, dass das Wrap-around-Display nicht wie beim Axon 30 Ultra zu einer messerscharfen Kante an der Seite des Geräts führt. Abgesehen davon fühlt sich die Glasrückseite ähnlich an wie bei den Samsung-Handys, da sie robust ist und keine Kratzer abbekommt. Die schlanken Kunststofftasten lassen das Gerät jedoch billiger wirken als es ist, aber auf dem Wrap-Around-Display und der matten Glasoberfläche fühlen sie sich etwas natürlicher an als auf dem Kunststoffgehäuse des Axon 30 5G. Auf der anderen Seite bietet das Gerät auch die Möglichkeit, zwischen der Standard-Screen-Entsperrung oder dem biometrischen Zugriff über die Gesichtserkennung oder den Fingerabdruck-Scanner unter dem Display zu wählen, um das Telefon zu entsperren. Während die Gesichtserkennung gut funktionierte, kam es gelegentlich zu Verzögerungen, die wahrscheinlich auf ein Problem mit der Kamera unter dem Display zurückzuführen waren. Im Gegensatz dazu war der optische Fingerabdruckscanner unter dem Display ein Traum und funktionierte jedes Mal schnell und effektiv mit allen fünf Fingern, die der Benutzer speichern kann.
Was das Display anbelangt, so ist das ZTE Axon 40 Ultra mit einem AMOLED-Display ausgestattet. Insgesamt ist die Größe natürlich großartig, um jede Art von Inhalt zu sehen, was wiederum dem Samsung S22 Ultra mit 6,8 Zoll entspricht. Es ist jedoch erwähnenswert, dass dieses Gerät eine viel geringere Auflösung von 1116 x 2480 bietet. Außerdem sind die winzigen Ränder an der Ober- und Unterseite des Geräts kaum wahrnehmbar, was dem Axon ein beeindruckendes Verhältnis von 93 % Bildschirm zu Gehäuse verleiht (etwas höher als beim S22 Ultra). Noch besser ist, dass das Handy auch eine hohe Bildwiederholfrequenz von 144 Hz bietet, was besonders beim Scrollen durch soziale Medien und beim Spielen von Spielen mit hoher Bildwiederholrate praktisch ist. Abgesehen davon verfügt das ZTE Axon 40 Ultra auch über einen beeindruckenden Helligkeitsbereich, der das Gesamterlebnis in hellen und dunklen Bereichen verbessert, denn mit einer Spitzenhelligkeit von 1500 nits war das Gerät auch bei hellem Sonnenlicht gut ablesbar, selbst beim Anschauen dunkler Videos. Was die Leistung angeht, so wird dieses Smartphone vom Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 angetrieben, der im Jahr 2022 eine der Standardoptionen für High-End-Smartphones geworden ist. Es ist erwähnenswert, dass es alles mit Bravour gemeistert hat und beim Streaming oder Spielen keine Lags oder Glitches auftraten, selbst auf der berüchtigten, fragwürdigen HBO Max-Plattform. Das Gerät verfügt außerdem über einen 5.000-mAh-Akku. Was die Kamera betrifft, so verfügt dieses Modell über drei rückwärtige 64-MP-Kameras. Insgesamt können die Kameras mehr beeindrucken als man erwarten kann, da es ohne die KI-Power hinter dem Array ist. Es ist definitiv ein großartiges Telefon, das man je nach Bedarf und Vorliebe des Nutzers ausprobieren kann.
Hands-on Artikel von Jagadisa Rajarathnam
Qualcomm Adreno 730: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SoC. Laut Qualcomm um 30% schneller als die alte Adreno 660 im Snapdragon 888.
Diese Klasse ist noch durchaus fähig neueste Spiele flüssig darzustellen, nur nicht mehr mit allen Details und in hohen Auflösungen. Besonders anspruchsvolle Spiele laufen nur in minimalen Detailstufen, wodurch die grafische Qualität oft deutlich leidet. Diese Klasse ist nur noch für Gelegenheitsspieler empfehlenswert. Der Stromverbrauch von modernen Grafikkarten in dieser Klasse ist dafür geringer und erlaubt auch bessere Akkulaufzeiten.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
SD 8 Gen 1: High-End SoC (System on a Chip) für Smartphones welcher Ende 2021 vorgestellt wurde. Integriert unter anderen einen schnellen Cortex-X2 "Prime Core" mit bis zu 3 GHz und drei weitere schnelle Cortex-A710 basierende Performance-Kerne mit bis zu 2,5 GHz. Zum Stromsparen wurden außerdem 4 weitere ARM Cortex-A510 Kerne verbaut. Integriert ein 5G Modem, WiFi 6e und eine Hexagon AI Engine.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
6.80": Es handelt sich um ein kleines Display-Format für Smartphones. Man sollte nicht stark fehlsichtig sein und man wird wenig Details am Bildschirm sehen und nur eine kleine Auflösung zur Verfügung haben. Dafür sollte das Gerät klein und handlich sein, gut transportierbar.» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.
0.204 kg:
In diese Gewichtsklasse fallen die meisten Smartphones und nur vereinzelt Tablets. Nur wenige Smartphones sind schwerer und eher als Tablets anzusehen.
ZTE:
ZTE ist die Kurzform für Zhong Xing Telecommunication Equipment Company Limited, die 1985 in China gegründet wurde und sich teilweise in Staatsbesitz befindet. Das Kerngeschäft von ZTE sind drahtlose, optische Übertragungen, Datenübertragungsgeräte, Telekommunikationssoftware und Mobiltelefone, USB-Sticks, Router und Tablets.
80.08%: Diese Bewertung ist leicht überdurchschnittlich, es gibt etwas mehr Geräte mit schlechteren Beurteilungen. Klare Kaufempfehlungen sehen aber anders aus.
» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.