Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7-12700F

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

► remove from comparison AMD R5 5600X

Der AMD Ryzen 5 5600X ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit 6-Kernen und Hyperthreading (SMT). Somit kann der Prozessor insgesamt 12 Threads gleichzeitig verarbeiten. Mit dem Launch im November 2020 ist er der schnellste Ryzen Desktop-Prozessor mit 6 Kernen. Mit einer TDP von 65 Watt ist der Ryzen 5 5600X bislang das sparsamste Modell der neuen Zen-3-Familie. 

Der Ryzen 5 5600X taktet mit 3,7 GHz Basistakt und kann per Precision-Boost 2 auf bis zu 4,6 GHz takten.

Intel Core i7-12700F

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700F

Der Intel Core i7-12700F ist ein top moderner und sehr schneller Acht-Kern-Desktop-Prozessor auf Basis der Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im November 2021 vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor bietet einen Basistakt von 3,3 GHz und erreicht bis zu 4,9 GHz im Turbo. Genauso, wie bei dem Intel Core i7-12700K basiert der Core i7-12700F auf 8P- und 4E-Kerne. Die Neuerungen des kleineren 10-nm-Fertigungsprozess sogen in Summe für eine gute Leistung. Der Intel Core i7-12700F bietet keinen freien Multiplikator, was das Übertakten somit einschränkt.

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i7-11700F konnte die IPC beim neuen Core i7-12700F deutlich gesteigert werden. Das sorgt insgesamt für einen spürbaren Leistungsschub, der sich auch auf die Multi-Core-Leistung auswirkt. Durch die 4 E-Cores seht den P-Cores deutlich mehr Leistung zur Verfügung. Wenn alle Voraussetzungen erfüllt werden, kann Intel Turbo Boost 3.0 den Takt der P-Cores auf bis zu 4,9 GHz erhöhen. Auch die E-Cores bieten einen Turbo und takten mit maximal 3,6 GHz.

Grafikeinheit

Bei dem Intel Core i7-12700F handelt es sich um einen Prozessor ohne integrierte Grafikeinheit. Wer auf eine iGPU angewiesen ist, sollte sich den leistungstechnischen Intel Core i7-12700 genauer anschauen.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP des Intel Core i7-12700F beläuft sich auf 65 Watt, mit der Option im Turbo bis zu 180 Watt zu verbrauchen.

show full text
ModelAMD Ryzen 5 5600XIntel Core i7-12700F
SeriesAMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)Intel Alder Lake-S
CodenameVermeer (Zen 3)Alder Lake
Serie: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X compare3.4 - 4.9 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X compare3.8 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X compare3.4 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X « 3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3700 - 4600 MHz3300 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB1 MB
L2 Cache3 MB12 MB
L3 Cache32 MB25 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 1212 / 20
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C
SocketAM4LGA 1700
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
Architecturex86x86
$299 U.S.$386 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
Die Size215 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 5600X
37.5 pt (62%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -94%
...
Intel Core i7-11700K
36.8 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
36.9 -2%
Intel Core i9-11900KB
36.9 -2%
Intel Core i5-13500T
37 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
37 -1%
Intel Core 5 120U
37.1 -1%
Intel Core i7-12650H
37.1 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 7540U
37.3 -1%
Intel Core 7 150U
37.4 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
37.5
Intel Core i5-13500H
37.6 0%
Intel Core i7-1360P
37.6 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
37.6 0%
Intel Core i9-13905H
37.7 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
37.7 1%
Intel Core i7-1365U
37.7 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
37.8 1%
Intel Core i5-13450HX
37.8 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
37.9 1%
...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 60%
0%
100%
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700F
39.8 pt (66%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
39.4 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
39.4 -1%
Intel Core i9-12900HK
39.4 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
39.4 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
39.5 -1%
Intel Core i7-12800HX
39.5 -1%
Intel Core i7-13700H
39.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
39.6 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
39.8 0%
Intel Core i7-12700F
39.8
Intel Core i9-12900
39.9 0%
Intel Core i5-14500
39.9 0%
Intel Core i5-12600K
40 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
40.2 1%
Intel Core i7-13650HX
40.3 1%
Intel Core i7-13705H
40.3 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
40.4 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
40.6 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
40.9 3%
...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 51%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11838 Points (11%)
15291 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1541 Points (65%)
1898 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
601 Points (67%)
726 Points (80%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4567 Points (11%)
5786 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1968 Points (12%)
2610 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
254 Points (71%)
271 Points (76%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.8 Points (28%)
33.5 Points (43%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3 Points (70%)
3.3 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6462 Points (39%)
9146 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
39331 Points (28%)
56067 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
69545 Points (44%)
93400 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
12563 Points (15%)
15176 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
113.9 s (1%)
128.3 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.9 s (1%)
3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
13282 Points (21%)
8695 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
56607 MIPS (32%)
61218 MIPS (35%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6594 MIPS (78%)
6145 MIPS (72%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
117 fps (39%)
118.6 fps (40%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
320 fps (74%)
296.5 fps (68%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
15.7 fps (28%)
17.7 fps (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (28%)
1.5 GB/s (44%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.5 GB/s (26%)
2.8 GB/s (48%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.7 GB/s (28%)
3.3 GB/s (9%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
260.2 Seconds (2%)
212 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14576 Points (31%)
15823 Points (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
7.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.5 s (1%)
16.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
400.9 s (2%)
386.3 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
66603 Points (51%)
66554 Points (51%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
19649 Points (50%)
23748 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
88825 Points (72%)
81273 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
88777 Points (72%)
77233 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
91500 Points (76%)
79448 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
16447 Points (42%)
17840 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25990 Points (46%)
31106 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8911 Points (38%)
11521 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1657 Points (65%)
1590 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
8980 Points (16%)
10126 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1587 Points (7%)
1557 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8926 Points (28%)
10249 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6953 Points (69%)
6698 Points (67%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
35617 Points (36%)
39852 Points (40%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
578 ms (1%)
522 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94804 Points (82%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
271 Points (76%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
286 Points (60%)
281 Points (59%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1489 Points (57%)
1841 Points (71%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
175.8 Watt (30%)
114.6 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
170.1 Watt (31%)
127.6 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.7 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
11.6 Points per Watt (9%)
20.5 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 5600X → 100% n=46

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700F → 113% n=46

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 08. 22:16:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12785 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14604 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731100582s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12785 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 12785 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14604 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 14604 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.055s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.057s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)