Nokia 7.2
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.0, Quad-Pixel)
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 47 Bewertungen (aus 96 Tests)
Testberichte für das Nokia 7.2
Nach einem hervorragenden Start der 7er-Reihe sorgte das Nokia 7.1 im Test für lange Gesichter, denn vor allem dessen Akkulaufzeiten konnten nicht überzeugen. Mit dem Nokia 7.2 soll alles besser werden und HMD Global legt eine dicke Schüppe Akkuleistung, mehr Speicher und eine Triple-Kamera nach.
Quelle: WinFuture Archive.org version
Mit dem Nokia 7.2 hat der Hersteller HMD Global ein Mittelklasse-Smartphone im Angebot, das zwar eine passable Ausstattung mitbringt und hübsch gestaltet ist, aber auch einige Schwächen hat. In der Preisklasse um die 250 Euro ist es außerdem natürlich nicht gerade mit Hochleistungs-Hardware ausgestattet.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.03.2020
Quelle: WinFuture Archive.org version
Mit dem Nokia 7.2 möchte der Hersteller HMD Global wieder ein Smartphone unter dem bekannten Markennamen erfolgreich machen und setzt dabei unter anderem auf reines Android und eine leistungsstarke Kamera, die in Kooperation mit Zeiss entstanden ist. Allerdings hat das Nokia 7.2 auch ein paar Schwächen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.02.2020
Quelle: PCtipp.ch Archive.org version
Das Nokia 7.2 ist ein gutes Mittelklasse-Smartphone zum Budget-Preis. Wer keine speziellen Anforderungen an die Kamera oder den Speed hat und nur rund Fr. 300.– ausgeben möchte sowie schlicht-elegantes Design schätzt, für den ist das Nokia 7.2 empfehlenswert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.12.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net Archive.org version
Schön, dass Nokia weiterhin in allen Preisklassen mitmischt: mit der Marke verbindet man doch noch etwas und Android One macht sich in den unteren Preisklassen auch gut. Schade, dass das Nokia 7.2 im Vergleich ziemlich alt aussieht. Man setzt zwar auf die Kamera, kann aber gegenüber einem Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite oder Realme X2 nicht mithalten.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.12.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 65% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: MobiFlip Archive.org version
Für sich gesehen ist das Nokia 7.2 ein gutes Smartphone. Das Display sieht toll aus, die Verarbeitung ist top und kleine Designentscheidungen wie die Farbe und der beleuchtete Powerbutton sind ein extra Wow-Faktor. Was mich etwas enttäuscht hat, war allerdings der recht kleine Akku und die fehlenden Ladetechnologien wie Wireless Charge oder schnelles Laden über 5V 2A hinaus.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: WinFuture Archive.org version
Nach meinem längeren Testzeitraum bin ich vom Nokia 7.2 ziemlich begeistert. Für aktuell gerade einmal ca. 290€ bekommt man ein Smartphone, das in Punkto Design in direkte Konkurrenz zu Platzhirschen wie dem iPhone 11, dem Galaxy S10 oder aber dem P30 Pro tritt. Die Software läuft sauber, die Kamera ist okay und schießt bei gutem Licht auch extrem gute Bilder.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.11.2019
Quelle: Android Pit Archive.org version
Ich habe mich wirklich bemüht das Nokia 7.2 zu mögen. Ich war ein Fan der jüngsten Modelle von HMD Global und war auch weniger enttäuscht vom Nokia 9 PureView als einige andere in der Branche. Vor allem das Nokia 8.1 halte ich für großartig. So bin ich mit schweren Herzen zum Schluss gekommen, dass das Nokia 7.2 ein Rückschritt für die Marke ist.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech Stage Archive.org version
Das Nokia 7.2 ist ein solides Smartphone: Schick, gut verarbeitet und mit ordentlicher Technik für den aufgerufenen Preis ausgestattet. Dazu gehört ein potenter Prozessor, eine je nach Version ordentliche Menge Speicher, eine dem Preis angemessene Kamera und ein Akku, der nicht schon nach einem Tag aufgibt. Dank Android One gibt es sogar noch lange Updates – was will man mehr?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.10.2019
Quelle: WinFuture Archive.org version
Das Nokia 7.2 ist also ein würdiger Nachfolger für das Nokia 7.1 und bietet für seinen geringen Preis von gerade einmal 280€ auf Amazon ein extrem hochwertiges Gefühl, vergleichbar mit aktuellen Flaggschiffen. Man vergisst schnell, dass man ein Mittelklasse-Phone in der Hand hält und ist entsprechend über die kleinen „Mängel“ wie dem Fingerabdrucksensor und dem Lautsprecher schnell aufgebracht.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.10.2019
Quelle: Inside Handy Archive.org version
Das Preis-Leistungs-Niveau kann als solide bezeichnet werden. Die verbaute Technik ist guter Durchschnitt am Markt und besonders die kleine Speichervariante besitzt einen attraktiven Preispunkt. Die Konkurrenz, als Beispiel sei hier das Huawei P30 Lite genannt, ist dabei jedoch riesig.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.09.2019
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
Priced lower, the Nokia 7.2 has the potential to be a smash hit, but that’s where the Nokia 6.2 comes in. Between the similar design, and not-much-worse performance, the Nokia 6.2 is better positioned to take a swipe at the competition in some markets. The Nokia 7.2 packs all the right ingredients, but the inconsistent performance and less-than-competitive battery life is problematic. As it stands, it is just too expensive for what it brings to the table, which makes it too hard to recommend over the excellent competition. The phone becomes even harder to recommend in 2020 as it doesn’t deliver on competitive internals or the latest version of Android. Unless pure Android is the only feature you are interested in, steer clear of the Nokia 7.2.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Leistung: 59% Bildschirm: 77% Mobilität: 53%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 brings the best of Nordic design sensibilities and pairs it with a competitive camera and stock Android. Unfortunately, the rest of the package doesn't quite match up.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Leistung: 59% Bildschirm: 77% Mobilität: 53%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 isn’t a great choice for anyone hoping for quality audio using their phone’s speaker. The lack of stereo speakers is an immediate handicap in playing back most music sources and movie soundtracks, and detracts from immersive gaming experiences as well. In addition, the speaker doesn’t produce much volume, and tones are unevenly reproduced.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.03.2020
Quelle: Tom's Guide EN→DE Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 isn't a bad phone by any means, and there are aspects of it — particularly the phone's quality design and bright, HDR-compatible display — that are compelling at the $350 price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Mobile Syrup EN→DE Archive.org version
Nokia also promises that the device will get two years of software updates and three years of security updates so its off-the-shelf life should be expanded beyond a year. That said, the 7.2 still hasn’t been updated to Android 10. The phone is currently on sale in Canada for $549 at Best Buy, but Amazon.ca has it listed for as low as $473, which is a much more attractive price for this handset.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE Archive.org version
Nokia 7.2 with 6GB RAM and 128GB internal storage is still retailing for P15,990. As a phone, it’s not a bad performer. The battery life is surprisingly good and the Android One program seems to keep the performance in check. The quality of the design is arguably its best feature. However, it’s going to have a tough time on the market now that Realme XT(P16,990) and Redmi Note 8 Pro (P12,990). Those two are more packed with features and better specs. Should you get the Nokia 7.2 in 2020? Nope. Unless it retails for less than P10k, then maybe, just maybe.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.01.2020
Quelle: Htxt Africa EN→DE Archive.org version
Retailing for R6 299, you'll be hard pressed to find a better all-round mid-range phone than the Nokia 7.2. As with past Nokia Mobile devices we've reviewed, every inch of this phone is solid. Where it wins us over though is the camera performance, yielding richly detailed pictures in a variety of scenarios, which is really all you're looking for in your smartphone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Neowin EN→DE Archive.org version
When you're dealing with a smartphone in that $300 range, it's really about value for price. None of the features are actually going to be the best in the market; those titles will go to thousand-dollar phones. The Nokia 7.2 provides a heck of a lot of value, probably more than the Moto G7, something I never thought I'd say. The Moto G series has been my top pick for that price range for about five years now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Think Digit EN→DE Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 may not look all that powerful, but it’s a delight to use. The Snapdragon 660 is perfectly capable of handling the lightweight stock Android interface, offering reliable performance in handling the usual daily tasks, as well as during gaming. The camera is the dark horse, delivering consistently good results provided the subject is well-lit. Low-light images is a weakness however. The Nokia 7.2 also is one of the best looking smartphones in its segment, despite having a polycarbonate body and a rather big camera bump.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 79% Leistung: 78% Gehäuse: 68%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE Archive.org version
While Nokia has previously experimented with some interesting camera configurations to try and distinguish itself in the market, the 7.2 is a more conventional offering. The triple-camera setup with ultra-wide and depth-sensing options provides some versatility, and serious smartphone videographers will welcome the option of 4K video. For stills, good exposure, wide dynamic range, and pleasant color mean that Nokia gets some of the basics right, but autofocus instabilities, high noise, and regular ghosting artifacts are all areas requiring future development.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.01.2020
Quelle: Phone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 is a solid, affordable smartphone that caters to those who enjoy massive screens and clean Android software. It costs $330 at the time of writing, which positions it in the lower mid-range category. Make no mistake, though, you are getting what you’re paying for with the Nokia 7.2. This isn’t to say that you’re in for any unpleasant surprises; it just means that no wonders should be expected out of this otherwise likable handset.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 is a fairly affordable mid-ranger, so you would not expect flagship front camera performance, but better options are available even at its price point. The Nokia is capable of decent image and video results in good conditions, but quality drops off in low light, and there are too many issues overall, including exposure and color instabilities as well as a range of artifacts, to merit recommending the 7.2 to any passionate selfie shooter.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.12.2019
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
The design of the Nokia 7.2 is eye-catching and unique compared to most of the competition - for better or for worse - with a fairly angular design and a glass back that refracts the light to provide a high-end look. The internals are fairly standard for a mid-range device too. The main issue is disappointing camera performance, especially with regards to the ultra-wide camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE Archive.org version
On its own, the Nokia 7.2 is an excellent buy. It has a premium design, fantastic display, and clean software backed by guaranteed updates. It has its fair share of flaws, however, with some of the main points being the sluggish performance and a disappointing ultra-wide camera. The overall value you're getting with the 7.2 is quite good, but competing phones like the Pixel 3a make it a tougher sell.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 offers premium design and solid performance at a mid-range price. It’s only when the phone tries to go above and beyond with features like a wide-angle camera that it stumbles.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Guys EN→DE Archive.org version
Nokia is attacking the low to mid-range of the device market with quality handsets at the sub-$300 price tag — and it’s doing it better than Moto in my mind. To me, the overall hardware and camera experience is better on almost all the Nokia phones I’ve tested when compared to Moto. The same is true here with the Nokia 7.2 which lines up nicely against the Moto G7.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.11.2019
Quelle: Team Android EN→DE Archive.org version
HMD Global, extending its diverse Android phone lineup, has recently released new Nokia 7.2. The new addition picks up from where Nokia 7.1 left off, it improves a lot and retains all that was great! We recently received our review unit and after some thorough testing, here is what we think about the phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.10.2019
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 is a critical smartphone from HMD Global. The Finnish company seems to be betting a lot on the success of its latest mid-range smartphone in India, but I think the phone fell short on performance. While I do like the Nokia 7.2’s classic design and display, the phone does make compromises and the list is long. I wish the phone had a better processor and at least 6GB RAM on an entry-level model. The camera could have been better.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Phone World EN→DE Archive.org version
The design and quality of the phone is brilliant. But the price at which its available is very high. So, Nokia should rethink about it. And if they want to have a good sale in the market. They must reconsider their price tag.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.10.2019
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE Archive.org version
At Rs 18,599, the Nokia 7.2 is one of HMD Global’s most comprehensive midrange smartphone in recent times. It has a solid build, something that is true of most Nokia-branded phones. The phone’s display is good and its PureDisplay technology makes it ideal for video consumption. The cameras are not exceptionally good, but they are not bad, and the phone’s overall performance is smooth. Additionally, the phone’s cleverly implemented features, such as notification light in the power button and multi-purpose capacitive fingerprint sensor on the back, make it fun and convenient to use.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.10.2019
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE Archive.org version
Nokia 7.2 is HMD’s star smartphone right now and of course one would expect a good overall value for the device considering the Nokia 7.1 series and the Nokia 7 Plus. The device scores the highest in the camera and design department but there’s nothing else that we can say that makes it really ‘worth’. The ‘PureDisplay’ tech is good to look at but it still has some downers like what we mentioned above. The battery performance is decent. A major downside here is the older Qualcomm Snapdragon processor. Many may not fall for that. But if you are all for the experience and camera regardless of the specifications, this might just make the cut.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Team Android EN→DE Archive.org version
Inspecting other contents within the box, there is a SIM ejection tool provided right beneath where the phone lays. Further, there are standard accessories provided as well. A pair of regular headphones with built-in mic, a USB Type-C to type-A cable along with a wall-adapter that provides a maximum output of 10W.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.10.2019
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 looked like a promising phone on paper, and we hoped it would offer the same understated goodness that we remember the 7 plus for. That ended up not being the case though. For the price Nokia is asking for the 7.2 you can have better camera quality, superior display, longer battery life, beefier chipset - often more than one of these on the same phone. As such, the 7.2 is hard to recommend to anyone but the die-hard brand loyalist on a budget.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 62%
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
HMD Global squandered a potentially great opportunity with the Nokia 7.2. The Zeiss-branded triple cameras could have enticed previous Lumia die-hards to come back to the fold, but instead, it’ll probably leave them disappointed. With sub-par performance in low-light shooting and a disappointing night mode, it’s hard to recommend the Nokia 7.2 when there’s a lot better and cheaper, options in the market for budding mobile photographers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.10.2019
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
In the US, the 7.2 puts up a fight against some great competitors. The Pixel 3a series is priced just a bit higher, but delivers a superior imaging experience. The 3a matches the 7.2 with the same stock Android experienc, but tacks on a higher quality display and a wide-angle front-facing camera. You could also look at the Samsung Galaxy A50 which is an absolutely fantastic mid-ranger.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 20.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Leistung: 59% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 53%
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE Archive.org version
Priced at PHP 15,990, the Nokia 7.2 can stand its ground in the competitive mid-range market. While we wish it came with a better chipset, we can’t deny that the Nokia 7.2 is a competent smartphone with cameras that deliver well. Also, let’s not forget, this device runs on Stock Android, and the Nokia 7.2 fills in that gap in the market for an affordable device running on Stock Android. If you’re looking for that pure Stock Android experience alongside satisfying cameras and a solid design, then consider the Nokia 7.2 in your choices.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.10.2019
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE Archive.org version
At a price of less than £300, the Nokia 7.2 is a classy customer. We like its sleek but practical design and sharp display, while Android One continues to do wonders with relatively limited hardware. It’s an accomplished phone in most respects. What keeps the Nokia 7.2 from glowing praise is its patchy triple-camera system, which suffers from some inconsistent results and an ineffectual Night Mode.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
If you have only a couple hundred dollars to spend on a smartphone, HMD Global’s latest Nokia mid-rangers should be at the top of your list. The Nokia 7.2 and Nokia 6.2 may share the same design and materials, but each has its own internals that set up widely different price points.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.10.2019
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
The design of the Nokia 7.2 is eye-catching and unique compared to most of the competition - for better or for worse - with a fairly angular design and a glass back that refracts the light to provide a high-end look. The internals are fairly standard for a mid-range device too. The main issue is disappointing camera performance, especially with regards to the ultra-wide camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Stuff TV EN→DE Archive.org version
Had your fingers crossed for a cut-price Pixel 3a alternative? The Nokia 7.2 gets tantalisingly close. It looks the part, runs a clean version of Android (with the latest version set to follow swiftly) and has a battery that should last all day.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
A month after the triple-camera toting Nokia 7.2 was unveiled in IFA, HMD Global has brought the new smartphone to our shores. Armed with a Zeiss-branded, triple camera module headlined by a high-resolution 48-megapixel main camera, the Nokia 7.2 is the company’s contender in the highly competitive mid-range market.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.10.2019
Quelle: PC Mag EN→DE Archive.org version
Building on the strengths of its predecessor, the Nokia 7.2 offers an attractive design and solid specs, but it faces stiff competition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 is a meaningful upgrade over its predecessor, adding a faster processor, more capable cameras, and a new design language that is quite appealing. The phone's display is quite good, and its day-to-day performance is dependable. The cameras of the Nokia 7.2 are decent, but not the best in the segment. As for battery life, this phone can last easily last a day.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tech2.in.com EN→DE Archive.org version
A great software experience and an extremely flashy design aside, I believe that users will find no extra value for money in the Nokia 7.2. Yes it has decent cameras, but so does the Realme XT or the Vivo Z1X, both of which start at more than Rs 2,000 cheaper. The performance of the device will leave you wanting and while the battery on the device could be sufficient for some, competing devices will definitely offer a higher battery capacity with faster-charging speeds.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: India Today EN→DE Archive.org version
Nokia 7.2 is an expectedly delightful upgrade over its predecessor. We loved the look and feel of the Nokia 7.1 and the new model once again brings the same elegant charm and class, if not better. The Cyan Green colour is one I would vouch for, and you will be quite satisfied with how premium the phone feels in the hand.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Verge EN→DE Archive.org version
Nokia is getting closer to making the phone that might crack into the mainstream in a similar way that the Moto has done with its budget-friendly Moto G7. No other phone in this price range offers its alluring combo of 128GB of onboard storage by default; a svelte, matte glass design; and stock Android software with guaranteed updates. Its strengths even make it a convincing choice among other midrange phones. But if you’re able to spring an extra $50 and put up with half the amount of storage, the Pixel 3A provides a better camera and broader carrier support.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: T3 EN→DE Archive.org version
Perhaps the biggest problem with the Nokia 7.2 is the competition: the Pixel 3a, for example, has one of the best cameras around and doesn't cost much more. If there is a complaint against the Nokia 7.2 it's that it doesn't really stand out enough – but when you're talking about less than £300 for a phone, doing something that's really compelling is a tricky challenge for any smartphone maker.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 is a tough one to judge as in some areas it excels, but at the same time, other areas fall short of what’s on offer from the competition. We do generally like the angular design of the Nokia 7.2, with little details like building a notification LED into the power button and offering a dedicated Google Assistant button enhancing the overall look and feel of the device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.10.2019
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE Archive.org version
Unlike its mid-segmented predecessors that used to lag well behind offerings from the competition, the Nokia 7.2 actually manages to go toe to toe with them. If you are a spec hunter, you might not get too impressed by the chip on the Nokia 7.2 and might hem and haw about the battery. But if you are looking at a phone that looks premium and takes great pictures and for the most part, performs very smoothly, the 7.2 could well be the phone for you. The Redmi and Realme mid-segments might beat it in terms of newer processors and larger batteries but the 7.2 closes the gap on them in terms of the camera on them and opens up a gap of its own in terms of design. Add the stock Android with regular update factor and a battery life that while not being outstanding is more than adequate and we guess Realme and Redmi have reason to look over their shoulders.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Android Central EN→DE Archive.org version
On its own, the Nokia 7.2 is an excellent buy. It has a premium design, fantastic display, and clean software backed by guaranteed updates. It has its fair share of flaws, however, with some of the main points being the sluggish performance and a disappointing ultra-wide camera. The overall value you're getting with the 7.2 is quite good, but competing phones like the Pixel 3a make it a tougher sell.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.09.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE Archive.org version
To conclude, Nokia 7.2 is one of the best-designed smartphones from HMD Global. The phone looks sturdy and the display seems to be decent enough for streaming. The performance is yet to be tested out, though the pure Android experience is one strong point of this smartphone. As for the competition is concerned, the phone will be put against the likes of Realme XT, Oppo K3, Xiaomi Redmi K20 and more.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.09.2019
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
HMD Global on Thursday made its first appearance at IFA, one of Europe's most important technology trade exhibitions, to talk about how it is growing internationally and expanding on its strengths. The company unveiled two new smartphones and three featurephones, showcasing its strategy of appealing to multiple markets. The new Nokia 7.2 and Nokia 6.2 are both mid-budget Android smartphones but both promise premium features and looks. They should be launched internationally, including in India, within a few months. Gadgets 360 was live at the scene of the launch in Berlin, and here are our first impressions of both new devices.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.09.2019
Quelle: Pocket Lint EN→DE Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 offers premium design, a big display and an array of camera skills to tempt you towards the mid-range. Mission accomplished: this is a great looking phone that has plenty of appeal.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.09.2019
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE Archive.org version
We’ll reserve our full verdict for now, but based on our hands-on impressions, the Nokia 7.2 has the potential to be one of the best mid-range smartphones in 2019. The design is eye-catching and unique, the display is bright and crisp, and the rear-facing camera setup could potentially compete with what premium smartphones offer.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.09.2019
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.2 is a solid step up from the Nokia 7.1 in a variety of ways, but it’s unlikely to make you a Nokia fan if you weren’t already, and there are other smartphones at the same price that are perhaps a little more interesting.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.09.2019
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE Archive.org version
With a starting price of €299, the Nokia 7.2 is a seriously tempting prospect. It looks to have a great screen, capable camera and all the benefits that come with Android One software.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.09.2019
Quelle: Android Authority EN→DE Archive.org version
These phones hit the market in mere weeks. The Nokia 7.2 should arrive before the end of September for 349 euros. It will be sold in most markets worldwide, include the U.S. (via open channels). HMD says it is working to strengthen its relationships with U.S. carriers and until it does the open market is the way it will go. The Nokia 6.2 will go on sale in mid-October at the more affordable price point of 209 euros. The 6.2 will not be sold in the U.S. and is something HMD expects to sell across Asia, Africa, and EMEA. The pricing and availability details are not final and may change.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.09.2019
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Andro 4 All ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; high performance. Negative: Poor cameras in low light condition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.04.2020
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.01.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Preis: 65% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: AndroidPit.it IT→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great built quality; nice performance. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.02.2020
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.12.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.12.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: AndroidPit.fr FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: AndroidPit.fr FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; nice design; great built quality; decent hardware; good performance.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.09.2019
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail RU→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 68% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 50% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Mega Obzor RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; solid workmanship; nice display; high performance; excellent cameras. Negative: Short battery life; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.12.2019
Quelle: Hitech Vesti RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; nice display; great trio cameras; NFC chip. Negative: Weak processor; short battery life; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 26.11.2019
Quelle: Zive CZ→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; bright display; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.05.2020
Quelle: Techtimes.vn VN→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.10.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; compact size; light weight; nice cameras; solid workmanship; great display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.12.2019
Quelle: XT Mobile VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality. Negative: Weak hardware; average performance; short battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.11.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; great built quality; nice performance; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.10.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; high performance; long battery life; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.10.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; modern design; great cameras; decent hardware; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.10.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; impressive cameras; decent hardware; high performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.10.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; decent hardware; solid workmanship; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.09.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; frameless display; great triple cameras; high performance; impressive autonomy; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.09.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice performance; beautiful design; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.09.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice triple cameras; high performance; powerful hardware; excellent display; impressive design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.09.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; good triple cameras; decent hardware; nice performance; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.09.2019
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice triple cameras; attractive price; good hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.09.2019
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; elegant design; metal case; nice triple cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.09.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; high performance; nice triple cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.09.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; metal case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.09.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; metal case; nice cameras; decent hardware; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.09.2019
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; decent hardware; nice display; metal case; attractive price.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.09.2019
Quelle: Tek.no NO→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 04.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Tek.no NO→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Tek.no NO→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Input DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 80% Leistung: 40% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: Alt om Data DA→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 60%
Quelle: M3 PC för alla SV→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.12.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74%
Quelle: Arena IT →DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Preis: 60% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Kommentar
Qualcomm Adreno 512: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SoC. Basiert auf die 500er Grafikarchitektur wie der schnellere Adreno 520 im Snapdragon 820. Qualcomm gibt bis zu 30% höhere Performance an (wahrscheinlich im Vergleich zum Adreno 510).
Diese Karten können nur sehr alte und sehr anspruchslose 3D Spiele flüssig darstellen. Anwendungen wie Office, Internet surfen, Bildbearbeitung oder (SD) Videoschnitt sind jedoch ohne große Einschränkungen möglich.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
SD 660: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo 260 Kernen (bis 2,2 GHz) und einem X12 LTE Modem (bis zu 600 Mbps Download).» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
6.30": Es handelt sich um ein kleines Display-Format für Smartphones. Man sollte nicht stark fehlsichtig sein und man wird wenig Details am Bildschirm sehen und nur eine kleine Auflösung zur Verfügung haben. Dafür sollte das Gerät klein und handlich sein, gut transportierbar.» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.
0.18 kg:
In diese Gewichtsklasse fallen die meisten Smartphones und nur vereinzelt Tablets. Nur wenige Smartphones sind schwerer und eher als Tablets anzusehen.
Nokia: Nokia ist ein finnisches Unternehmen, das 1865 gegründet wurde und seinen Hauptsitz in Finnland, hat. Das Unternehmen ist bekannt für seine Telekommunikationsausrüstung und Mobiltelefone. Nokia war in den 1990er Jahren einer der führenden Hersteller von Mobiltelefonen und hat in den letzten Jahren seine Geschäftstätigkeit auf Netzwerk- und Technologielösungen ausgeweitet.
2011 ging Nokia mit Microsoft eine Partnerschaft über Windows-basierte Mobiltelefone ein und verkaufte die gesamte Mobiltelefonsparte 2014 an Microsoft, welche den Markennamen Nokia auf einfache Mobiltelefone beschränkte. 2016 schloss der finnische Elektronikhersteller HMD Global einen Lizenzvertrag mit Nokia, kaufte Microsoft Mobile die verbliebenen Nokia-Namensrechte ab und bietet seit 2017 weltweit exklusiv Nokia-Mobiltelefone an, die unter anderem auf Android basieren und von Foxconn produziert werden.
73.8%: Diese Bewertung ist schlecht. Locker drei Viertel der Modelle werden besser beurteilt. Das ist eher keine Kaufempfehlung. Auch wenn Verbalbewertungen in diesem Bereich gar nicht so schlecht klingen ("genügend" oder "befriedigend"), meist sind es Euphemismen, die eine Klassifikation als unterdurchschnittliches Notebook verschleiern.
» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.