Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 10-Core GPU vs NVIDIA T1000

Apple M2 10-Core GPU

Apple M2 10-Core GPU

Die Apple M2 GPU ist eine selbst designte Grafikkarte im Apple M2 SoC und laut Apple mit acht oder zehn Kernen. Die 10-Kern-Variante bietet wahrscheinlich 160 Ausführungseinheiten und eine theoretische Maximalleistung von 3,6 Teraflops. Damit ist sie um 1 Teraflop schneller als die alte 8-Kern-GPU im Apple M1 und soll auch größere Caches bieten.

Bei der Performance gibt Apple eine 35% höhere Performance (bei leicht höherem Stromverbrauch von 15 Watt) an. In unseren Benchmarks sehen wir einen Vorsprung von knapp 40% gegenüber dem M1, die 14-Kern-GPU vom M1 Pro bleibt aber deutlich voran.

Die M2-GPU unterstützt Apple's Metal 2 Schnittstelle und dürfte eine ähnliche Architektur wie die älteren PowerVR Grafikeinheiten (z.B. im Apple A10) aufweisen.

Da der SoC im (second generation) 5nm Prozess bei TSMC hergestellt wird (wahrscheinlich N5P), sollte die Energieeffizienz sehr sein. Die GPU nutzt laut internen Tools unter Last in etwa 13,5 Watt (15 Watt laut Apple).

Apple M2 10-Core GPUNVIDIA T1000
Quadro Turing Serie
M2 Max 38-Core GPU compare 38
M2 Max 30-Core GPU compare 30
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU compare 19 @ 0.44 - 1.4 GHz
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU compare 16
M2 10-Core GPU 10 @ 1.4 GHz
M2 8-Core GPU compare 8 @ 1.4 GHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Pipelines10 - unified
Kerntakt1398 (Boost) MHz
SpeichertypLPDDR5-6400
Shared Memoryneinnein
Stromverbrauch15 Watt
Herstellungsprozess5 nm
Erscheinungsdatum06.06.2022
PredecessorM1 8-Core GPU
CPU in M2 10-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M28 x 2424 MHz, 20 W? MHz1398 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T1000
3.7 pt (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
100%
1 T1000 +
3534 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
3088 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
398761 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
179865 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
100%
1 T1000 +
37881 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
50553 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
100%
1 T1000 +
8124 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
8450 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
237130 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 21302     avg: 23924     median: 24236 (12%)     max: 25317 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5328     avg: 6533     median: 6823.5 (8%)     max: 6987 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
100%
1 T1000 +
34584 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
100%
1 T1000 +
41157 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
100%
1 T1000 +
12953 Points (18%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
11793 Points (10%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
100%
1 T1000 +
46318 Points (13%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
100%
1 T1000 +
39668 Points (22%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T1000 +
78565 Points (86%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark 06
100%
1 T1000 +
58968 Points (77%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
100%
1 T1000 +
42.2 fps (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (59%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom METAL *
min: 205     avg: 221     median: 221 (23%)     max: 237 Seconds
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
39.3 fps (28%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
18.1 fps (12%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
78.1 fps (38%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
37.3 fps (23%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
44 fps (14%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
13.4 fps (13%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
62.8 fps (10%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
9.5 fps (2%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
43.3 fps (21%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
21.9 fps (14%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
27.4 fps (11%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
100%
1 T1000 +
6837 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 T1000 +
252.5 fps (83%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 128.65     avg: 132.8     median: 131 (8%)     max: 140.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
335.8 fps (20%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35.6     avg: 43.9     median: 47.9 (19%)     max: 48.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 68     avg: 96     median: 102.6 (19%)     max: 110 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 208     avg: 267.5     median: 283.8 (21%)     max: 296 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 136     avg: 197.6     median: 206.1 (23%)     max: 232 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 247     avg: 318.6     median: 331.5 (7%)     max: 374.6 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 411     avg: 503     median: 509.5 (30%)     max: 557.2 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 628     avg: 824     median: 891.5 (7%)     max: 931.9 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 654168     avg: 728087     median: 728086 (91%)     max: 802005 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
100%
1 T1000 +
386 fps (2%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
100%
1 T1000 +
31.9 fps (7%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 27880     avg: 27900     median: 27900 (8%)     max: 27920 Points
38611 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
100%
1 T1000 +
36031 Points (10%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Metal
min: 42013     avg: 44473     median: 45460 (29%)     max: 45946 Points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
1987 Samples/s (9%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
4129 Samples/s (7%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
100%
1 T1000 +
6369 Points (7%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
101.9 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.8     avg: 27.8     median: 26.9 (4%)     max: 34.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 27.8     avg: 32.5     median: 30.8 (7%)     max: 38.9 Watt
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 16     avg: 16.5     median: 16.7 (6%)     max: 16.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 1.007     avg: 1     median: 1 (91%)     max: 1.108 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 1.116     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (92%)     max: 1.207 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
156.8 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Power Efficiency
100%
1 T1000 +
min: 0.07462     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (18%)     max: 0.4205 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
34.6 dB(A) (55%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 10-Core GPU → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T1000 → 165% n=3

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
T1000:
98.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
82.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
58.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
22  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
19  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
15  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
10  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
138.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
90.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
50.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
39.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
44  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
38  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
45.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
34.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
28.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
23.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
45  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
35.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
30.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
29.5  fps
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
T1000:
108.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
96.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
63.6  fps
Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
ultra Ultra
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
59.3  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
69.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
55.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
35.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
27.6  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
125.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
91.3  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
69.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
49.7  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
51.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
42.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
33.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
21.4  fps
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
T1000:
110.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
56.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
47.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
40.3  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
118.8  fps
ultra
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
58.5  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
ultra
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
65  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
118.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
53.1 66.8 73 ~ 64 fps
236%
T1000:
151  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
34 34.2 36 ~ 35 fps
171%
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
22 23.8 28 ~ 25 fps
153%
T1000:
38.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
15 16.4 17.6 ~ 16 fps
179%
T1000:
28.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
88.6 89 136 138 ~ 113 fps
173%
T1000:
195.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
39 45.3 46.3 47 ~ 44 fps
136%
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
22 26.3 29 29.5 ~ 27 fps
138%
T1000:
37.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
15.9 16 21 21.3 ~ 19 fps
127%
T1000:
24.1  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
117  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
58  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
53  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
102.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
33  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
26.1  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
60 76 102 ~ 79 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
28 31 39 40 ~ 35 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
25 27 36 36 ~ 31 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
21 23 31 32 ~ 27 fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
20  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
T1000:
226  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
87.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
69.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
59.9  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
high
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
39.8  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
T1000:
127  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
57  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
53  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
211  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
145.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
130.1  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
101.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
49.3  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
36.2  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
246.2  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
217.7  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
150.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
136.5  fps
low 1024x768
T1000:
188.8  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
113.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
34  fps
188%
T1000:
63.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
28  fps
126%
T1000:
35.2  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
T1000:
187.4  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
187.1  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
103.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
50.2  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
high
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
67.7  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
100%
M2 10-Core GPU:
44.2  fps

Average Gaming Apple M2 10-Core GPU → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA T1000 → 163%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 152%

NVIDIA T1000lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2498.482.658.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora22191510
Total War Pharaoh138.690.850.639.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage444038
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty45.134.228.323.8
Baldur's Gate 34535.230.229.5
F1 23108.396.563.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands69.255.635.327.6
GRID Legends125.491.369.649.7
God of War51.842.533.521.4
Far Cry 6110.456.947.440.3
Borderlands 31516038.228.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms195.96037.324.1
Far Cry New Dawn117625853
Metro Exodus102.345.93326.1
Strange Brigade22687.269.459.9
Far Cry 5127625753
X-Plane 11.11211145.8130.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark101.349.336.2
Dota 2 Reborn246.2217.7150.4136.5
The Witcher 3188.8113.863.935.2
GTA V187.4187.1103.550.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4
7
10
1
8
10
3
2
13
5
2
8
8

1






Apple M2 10-Core GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal59.3
Call of Duty Mobile118.858.5
Genshin Impact65
Armajet118.4
Borderlands 364352516
Total War: Three Kingdoms113442719
Shadow of the Tomb Raider7935312720
PUBG Mobile39.8
The Witcher 33428
Asphalt 8: Airborne67.7
Asphalt 9: Legends44.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4

3

2
4
2
4
2
1
1





Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 20. 00:25:32

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11368 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12782 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726784731s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:16:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.027s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11368 +0.018s ... 0.045s

#9 got single benchmarks 11368 +0.006s ... 0.052s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12782 +0.006s ... 0.058s

#11 got single benchmarks 12782 +0.004s ... 0.062s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.028s ... 0.09s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.09s

#15 Got 137 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.102s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.102s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.103s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.009s ... 0.113s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.113s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.115s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)