Notebookcheck Logo

unknown vs Intel Core i5-13400F

Intel Core i5-13400F

Intel i5-13400F

Der Intel Core i5-13400F ist ein top moderner und sehr schneller Desktop Prozessor auf Basis der neuen Raptor-Lake-Serie und wurde am 04.01.2023 vorgestellt. Der Prozessor bietet einen Basistakt von 2,5 GHz und erreicht bis zu 4,6 GHz im Turbo. Wie schon seit der Alder-Lake-Serie bekannt, basieren Intels aktuelle Prozessoren auf ein hybrides Design, welches P- und E-Kerne vereint. Der Intel Core i5-13400F vereint 6 P-Cores und 4 E-Cores, welche in Summe bis zu 16 Threads parallel verarbeiten können. Gefertigt wird der Prozessor weiterhin 10-nm-Fertigungsprozess. Einen frei wählbaren Multiplikator gibt es bei dem Intel Core i5-13400F nicht. Zudem verrät uns der Zusatz F, dass keine iGPU vorhanden ist. Als Basis dient der mit der Alder-Lake-Serie eingeführte LGA 1700 Sockel. Der 13400F kann entweder auf einem Raptor Lake oder Alder Lake Chip basieren. Anfangs werden Alder Lake Chips ausgeliefert.

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-12400F konnte die IPC beim neuen Core i5-13400F etwas gesteigert werden. Gleichwohl gibt es nunmehr auch 4 E-Cores, welche dem Prozessor in puncto Multi-Thread-Performance unter die Arme greift. Somit rangiert der Intel Core i5-13400F auf dem Level eines Intel Core i5-12600K, welcher ebenfalls in Summe 16 Threads bietet.

Grafikeinheit

Alle aktuellen Intel-Prozessoren, welche das F als Namenszusatz haben, werden ohne iGPU ausgeliefert.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP des Intel Core i5-13400F beläuft sich auf 65 Watt im PL1. Die PL2-Grenze definiert Intel bei 148 Watt.

ModelunknownIntel Core i5-13400F
Architecturex86x86
CodenameRaptor Lake-S
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-S
Serie: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake-S
Intel Core i7-13700 compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB
L2 Cache9.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 16
TDP65 Watt
Technology10 nm
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1700
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2
$196 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
37.9 pt (63%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15911 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1744 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
672 Points (75%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6091 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
2364 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (71%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.5 Points (36%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (73%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8689 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51113 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
82988 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13947 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
367.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8602 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
60048 MIPS (34%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5743 MIPS (68%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
136.9 fps (46%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
314.5 fps (73%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.2 fps (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.2 GB/s (32%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13989 Points (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
420.5 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77937 Points (60%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23820 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
77765 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
76636 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
37732 Points (31%)
80273 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8923 Points (23%)
19846 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28087 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5039 Points (21%)
12669 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
3351 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
947 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1884 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
729 Points (28%)
1792 Points (70%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
1922 Points (3%)
12095 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
737 Points (3%)
1721 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1868 Points (6%)
12009 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3432 Points (34%)
7684 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8375 Points (8%)
43856 Points (44%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 unknown +
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 unknown +
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1184.2     avg: 10269     median: 14670 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
535 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 10326     median: 2773.5 (2%)     max: 33085 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
109 Points (31%)
254 Points (71%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
120 Points (22%)
294 Points (54%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
428405 Points (14%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
100%
1 unknown +
146507 Points (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 unknown +
54.1 MB/s (37%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 unknown +
439 MB/s (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 unknown +
38.7 MB/s (47%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 unknown +
463 MB/s (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 unknown +
10431 Points (5%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 unknown +
12370 Points (46%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
593 Points (22%)
1941 Points (73%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
214 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
184.2 Watt (34%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 unknown +
4.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.3 Watt (50%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 unknown +
1.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks unknown → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 497% n=14

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 10. 04:23:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1736479402s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Jan 2025 05:19:20 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.132s ... 0.135s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.004s ... 0.14s

#10 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.004s ... 0.144s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.144s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.185s

#13 return log +0.016s ... 0.201s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)