unknown vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core Ultra 7 165H ist eine High-End-CPU der Meteor-Lake-H-Serie die im Dezember 2023 vorgestellt wurde. Der SoC setzt zum ersten Mal auf ein Tile/Chiplet-Design. Der Compute-Tile bietet 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Redwood Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Crestmont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 22 Threads) und takten bis 5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten mit maximal 3,8 GHz. Zusätzlich gibt es nun noch zwei weitere Low-Power-Efficiency-Kerne auf der Low-Power-Island, im Leerlauf und bei einfachen Aufgaben kann der Compute-Tile daher komplett deaktiviert werden, um Strom zu sparen.
Performance
Mit Meteor-Lake-P wird die bisherige Architektur weiter verbessert, es gibt aber keine grundlegenden Änderungen. Die Leistung ist daher auch nur geringfügig höher als bei den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren. Im Vergleich zum Core Ultra 7 155H , bietet der 165H nur einen 200 MHz höheren Boost takt der CPU und 50 MHz bei der iGPU.
Grafikeinheit
Der Core Ultra 7 165H bietet eine neue ARC-iGPU mit 8 Xe-Kernen und 128 EUs, die maximal 2,3 GHz erreichen. Die Leistung gegenüber der alten Iris Xe Graphics G7 mit 96 EUs konnte ungefähr verdoppelt werden.
Features
Meteor Lake-H hat WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) integriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt jetzt LPDDR5/x-7467 (max. 64 GB) oder DDR5-5600 (max. 96 GB). Es kommt nun eine dedizierte NPU (2x Gen3 Neural Compute Engines) zum Einsatz. Die Xe Media Engine unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode bis zu 8K 10-Bit HDR. Der Chip unterstützt jetzt PCIe-5.0 (x8 für GPU) und PCIe-4.0 (drei x12 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core Ultra 7 165H ist mit 28 Watt TDP (Base) und 64 Watt bzw. 115 Watt (PL2) max. Turbo Power angegeben. Meteor Lake besteht aus fünf einzelnen Chips, wobei der Prozessorteil im neuen Intel 4 Prozess (7nm) gefertigt wird. Die Grafikeinheit wird bei TSMC in N5 produziert und SoC und I/O-Tile im älteren N6 Prozess. Diese 4 Chips werden dann per Foveros-Verfahren auf den 22nm Base-Tile aufgebracht.
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ist eine High-End-CPU der Meteor-Lake-H-Serie die im Dezember 2023 vorgestellt wurde. Der SoC setzt zum ersten Mal auf ein Tile/Chiplet-Design. Der Compute-Tile bietet 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Redwood Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Crestmont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 22 Threads) und takten bis 5,1 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten mit maximal 3,8 GHz. Zusätzlich gibt es nun noch zwei weitere Low-Power-Efficiency-Kerne auf der Low-Power-Island, im Leerlauf und bei einfachen Aufgaben kann der Compute-Tile daher komplett deaktiviert werden, um Strom zu sparen.
Performance
Mit Meteor-Lake-P wird die bisherige Architektur weiter verbessert, es gibt aber keine grundlegenden Änderungen. Die Leistung ist daher auch nur geringfügig höher als bei den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren. Im Vergleich zum Core Ultra 7 165H , bietet der U9 185H nur einen 100 MHz höheren Boost takt der CPU und 50 MHz bei der iGPU.
Grafikeinheit
Der Core Ultra 9 185H bietet eine neue ARC-iGPU mit 8 Xe-Kernen und 128 EUs, die maximal 2,35 GHz erreichen. Die Leistung gegenüber der alten Iris Xe Graphics G7 mit 96 EUs konnte ungefähr verdoppelt werden.
Features
Meteor Lake-H hat WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) integriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt jetzt LPDDR5/x-7467 (max. 64 GB) oder DDR5-5600 (max. 96 GB). Es kommt nun eine dedizierte NPU (2x Gen3 Neural Compute Engines) zum Einsatz. Die Xe Media Engine unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode bis zu 8K 10-Bit HDR. Der Chip unterstützt jetzt PCIe-5.0 (x8 für GPU) und PCIe-4.0 (drei x12 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ist mit 28 Watt TDP (Base) und 64 Watt bzw. 115 Watt (PL2) max. Turbo Power angegeben. Meteor Lake besteht aus fünf einzelnen Chips, wobei der Prozessorteil im neuen Intel 4 Prozess (7nm) gefertigt wird. Die Grafikeinheit wird bei TSMC in N5 produziert und SoC und I/O-Tile im älteren N6 Prozess. Diese 4 Chips werden dann per Foveros-Verfahren auf den 22nm Base-Tile aufgebracht.
Model unknown Intel Core Ultra 7 165H Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Series Intel Meteor Lake-H Intel Meteor Lake-H Serie: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H Architecture x86 x86 x86 Codename Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H Clock 3800 - 5000 MHz 3800 - 5100 MHz L3 Cache 24 MB 24 MB Cores / Threads 16 / 22 16 / 22 TDP 28 Watt 45 Watt Technology 7 nm 7 nm max. Temp. 110 °C 110 °C Socket BGA2049 BGA2049 Features DDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA DDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA iGPU Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2300 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 165H
37.6 pt (63%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
39.3 pt (65%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
103.3 Points (58%)
min: 103 avg: 107.9 median: 107.5 (61%) max: 112.2 Points
CPU TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 115 W 93% 97% 100% 95% 98% 96%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 616 avg: 690 median: 690 (13%) max: 764 Points
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 81% 100%
min: 828 avg: 1001 median: 1021 (19%) max: 1096 Points
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 115 W 58% 72% 82% 100% 99% 96% 93%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14055 avg: 14783 median: 14551 (14%) max: 15743 Points
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 55 W 89% 92% 100%
min: 12688 avg: 17954 median: 18338 (17%) max: 19851 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 96% 64% 71% 73% 85% 82% 94% 78% 97% 100% 97% 93% 90% 92% 89%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1668 avg: 1731 median: 1759 (75%) max: 1766 Points
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 55 W 100% 100% 94%
min: 1620 avg: 1823 median: 1825 (78%) max: 1912 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 98% 95% 92% 92% 94% 90% 98% 80% 97% 100% 94% 97% 100% 85% 92%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 674 avg: 681 median: 683 (76%) max: 687 Points
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 55 W 98% 99% 100%
min: 622 avg: 704 median: 708 (78%) max: 735 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 98% 94% 92% 93% 94% 93% 98% 80% 96% 100% 97% 97% 100% 85% 96%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5471 avg: 5640 median: 5545 (14%) max: 5904 Points
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 55 W 93% 94% 100%
min: 4843 avg: 6919 median: 7192 (18%) max: 7651 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 95% 63% 72% 72% 84% 80% 96% 79% 97% 100% 97% 94% 88% 93% 91%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1029 avg: 1038 median: 1038 (7%) max: 1047 Points
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown Win10 1029 Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown macOS 1047
min: 2467 avg: 2583 median: 2641 (17%) max: 2642 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 55 W 39% 100% 93% 100%
min: 1581.9 avg: 2747 median: 2809 (18%) max: 3165 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 58% 73% 83% 78% 87% 86% 89% 76% 100% 95% 94% 90% 86% 90% 90%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 257 avg: 258 median: 257 (72%) max: 260 Points
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 55 W 100% 99% 99%
min: 238 avg: 266.8 median: 268 (75%) max: 281 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 98% 93% 93% 91% 93% 91% 97% 84% 96% 100% 95% 97% 100% 85% 93%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 33.95 avg: 34.7 median: 34.6 (45%) max: 35.55 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 97% 95% 100% 98%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.11 avg: 3.2 median: 3.1 (75%) max: 3.27 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 96% 100% 95% 96%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9719 avg: 9994 median: 9977.5 (60%) max: 10300 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 94% 100% 99% 95%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 59935 avg: 63422 median: 63273.5 (46%) max: 67204 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 92% 89% 96% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 88902 avg: 90904 median: 91265.5 (58%) max: 92183 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 99% 96% 99% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13892 avg: 14147 median: 14161 (17%) max: 14374 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 97% 100% 100% 97%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 87.408 avg: 215.6 median: 165.1 (2%) max: 441.275 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 102% 103% 100% 104% 104%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254 avg: 4.3 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 8.1 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 101% 101% 101% 101%
min: 6724 avg: 9769 median: 7940 (13%) max: 17856 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 48% 44% 38% 43%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 54741 avg: 58029 median: 56997 (33%) max: 62349 MIPS
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 55 W 88% 91% 100%
min: 52522 avg: 69756 median: 71752 (41%) max: 76331 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 95% 69% 72% 75% 84% 85% 96% 81% 97% 100% 99% 95% 93% 88% 91%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4939 avg: 5200 median: 5273 (62%) max: 5387 MIPS
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 55 W 100% 98% 92%
min: 4502 avg: 5472 median: 5560 (66%) max: 5781 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 98% 97% 93% 91% 98% 90% 98% 86% 86% 100% 95% 94% 94% 78% 99%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 153.6 avg: 159.7 median: 159.9 (53%) max: 165.6 fps
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 98% 96% 100% 93%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300.5 avg: 322.4 median: 326.3 (75%) max: 336.5 fps
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 89% 94%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.4 avg: 15.2 median: 15.2 (27%) max: 16 fps
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 90% 100%
min: 14.1 avg: 20.1 median: 20.7 (36%) max: 22.7 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 94% 62% 63% 70% 79% 76% 95% 80% 97% 100% 98% 92% 91% 91% 87%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96 avg: 1.1 median: 1.1 (32%) max: 1.3 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 74% 85% 85% 85% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4 avg: 1.8 median: 1.8 (31%) max: 2.3 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 61% 83% 78% 78% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9 avg: 10.8 median: 11.3 (29%) max: 12.1 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 65% 91% 93% 96% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 406 avg: 435 median: 435 (6%) max: 464 Seconds
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 100% 101%
min: 280 avg: 334.5 median: 306 (4%) max: 538 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 103% 100% 101% 102% 102% 103% 103% 102% 102% 103% 103% 103% 103% 103% 103%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 231 avg: 246 median: 246 (2%) max: 261 Seconds
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 100% 100%
min: 163 avg: 190.1 median: 177 (1%) max: 285 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 101% 100% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4565 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (10%) max: 0.4686 sec
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 100% 100%
min: 0.4313 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (10%) max: 0.503 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 104% 104% 104% 103% 104% 103% 104% 100% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 103% 104%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854 avg: 13153 median: 13074 (28%) max: 15529 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 85% 87% 75% 100% 82%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6 avg: 6.8 median: 6.8 (1%) max: 7.256 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.786 avg: 14.9 median: 14.9 (1%) max: 15.15 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 304.446 avg: 358 median: 366.9 (2%) max: 402.742 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 100% 100% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 73186 avg: 76512 median: 75742.5 (58%) max: 80494 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 94% 92% 100% 99% 91%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 18101 avg: 20276 median: 20275.5 (51%) max: 22450 Points
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 100% 81%
min: 12693 avg: 21136 median: 21998 (56%) max: 24629 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 89% 52% 91% 73% 73% 80% 91% 98% 100% 98% 84% 81% 90% 92%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74638 avg: 82141 median: 75716 (62%) max: 100241 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 80% 74% 75% 100% 88%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 73618 avg: 82055 median: 75494 (61%) max: 100192 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 80% 74% 75% 100% 89%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
37732 Points (31%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 37732
min: 78677 avg: 89559 median: 91059 (76%) max: 102469 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 67% 89% 83% 100% 92%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8923 Points (23%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 8923
min: 13733 avg: 14430 median: 14429.5 (37%) max: 15126 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 59% 91% 100%
min: 16393 avg: 19172 median: 18896 (48%) max: 21267 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 77% 66% 73% 79% 86% 95% 100% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23240 avg: 23582 median: 23582 (42%) max: 23924 Points
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 97% 100%
min: 21106 avg: 27867 median: 28582 (51%) max: 30623 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 95% 69% 76% 78% 79% 87% 91% 82% 99% 96% 100% 95% 89% 95% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5039 Points (21%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 5039
min: 7617 avg: 8260 median: 8259.5 (35%) max: 8902 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 57% 86% 100%
min: 6307 avg: 10888 median: 11454.5 (48%) max: 12209 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 79% 52% 62% 73% 78% 86% 97% 78% 99% 96% 100% 89% 82% 97% 94%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5778 Points (68%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 5778
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
1343 Points (34%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 1343
min: 2358 avg: 2429 median: 2421.5 (62%) max: 2513 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 41 W TDP 55 W 53% 96% 100% 97% 94%
min: 2199 avg: 2487 median: 2500 (64%) max: 2573 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 76% 97% 94% 98% 95% 97% 92% 98% 77% 98% 100% 97% 97% 100% 85% 96%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
4370 Points (17%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 4370
min: 11616 avg: 12341 median: 12230.5 (48%) max: 13288 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 41 W TDP 55 W 33% 92% 100% 92% 87%
min: 12825 avg: 13800 median: 13972 (55%) max: 14540 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 67% 94% 86% 94% 87% 98% 90% 95% 83% 100% 99% 100% 96% 100% 90% 98%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1006 Points (39%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 1006
min: 1688 avg: 1782 median: 1793.5 (70%) max: 1853 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 41 W TDP 55 W 54% 96% 100% 97% 91%
min: 1700 avg: 1834 median: 1856 (73%) max: 1902 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 75% 95% 94% 97% 95% 97% 91% 98% 72% 98% 100% 98% 98% 98% 89% 92%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
3951 Points (7%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 3951
min: 11733 avg: 12010 median: 12051.5 (22%) max: 12204 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 41 W TDP 55 W 32% 99% 96% 100% 98%
min: 10441 avg: 13288 median: 13496 (24%) max: 14230 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 64% 73% 85% 82% 86% 93% 87% 94% 81% 100% 98% 97% 95% 93% 90% 95%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1695 avg: 1788 median: 1799 (8%) max: 1830 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 98% 100% 100% 98% 93%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13228 avg: 13612 median: 13736 (43%) max: 13972 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 99% 95% 100% 95% 98%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7040 avg: 7372 median: 7422 (74%) max: 7602 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 99% 100% 96% 93%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47960 avg: 49362 median: 49781.5 (50%) max: 49924 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 96% 100% 100%
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 12.95
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 12.8
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 836.4 avg: 10153 median: 14670 (17%) max: 14953 ms
min: 514 avg: 518 median: 517.5 (1%) max: 521 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 100% 113% 113%
min: 494 avg: 521 median: 520 (1%) max: 594 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 100% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109%
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
7004 ms (66%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 7004
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2672 avg: 13727 median: 2773.5 (2%) max: 46687 Points
min: 90543 avg: 95362 median: 96090 (80%) max: 98144 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 31% 92% 96% 100% 98%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
160 Points (45%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 Chrome 130.0.6723.10212 GB 160
min: 259 avg: 263 median: 263 (74%) max: 267 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 60% 97% 100%
min: 237 avg: 260 median: 263.3 (74%) max: 271 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 80% 96% 96% 99% 98% 100% 97% 100% 100% 100% 94% 88% 92%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
200 Points (37%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 Chrome 130.0.6723.10212 GB 200
min: 291 avg: 293 median: 293 (54%) max: 295 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 68% 99% 100%
min: 237 avg: 279.6 median: 286.5 (53%) max: 301 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 82% 99% 99% 100% 98% 97% 96% 99% 100% 99% 89% 80% 91%
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
714538 Points (43%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 714538
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
197906 Points (54%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 197906
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
0 Points (0%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB (!)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
13858 Points (58%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 13858
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1028 Points (39%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 1028
min: 1690 avg: 1751 median: 1692 (65%) max: 1872 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 41 W 55% 90% 100% 90%
min: 1589 avg: 1774 median: 1772 (68%) max: 1971 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 74% 89% 88% 97% 88% 100% 91% 90% 94% 89% 94% 93% 82% 89%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 55.7 avg: 58.2 median: 58.2 (10%) max: 60.6 Watt
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 101% 100%
min: 44.4 avg: 116.6 median: 125.2 (22%) max: 176.1 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 110% 133% 130% 129% 126% 117% 112% 111% 106% 109% 100% 118%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 64.8 avg: 79.7 median: 79.7 (15%) max: 94.6 Watt
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 100% 107%
min: 88 avg: 130.9 median: 134.3 (24%) max: 171.8 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 107% 121% 128% 121% 119% 100% 104% 101% 113% 105% 114%
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
9.5 Watt (4%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 9.52
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.51 avg: 4.6 median: 4.6 (3%) max: 6.73 Watt
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 100% 103%
min: 5.1 avg: 12.3 median: 11.6 (8%) max: 21.4 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 100% 112% 111% 115% 109% 110% 102% 111% 109% 102% 108% 111%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.5 Watt (6%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 5.5
min: 3.01 avg: 5.3 median: 5.3 (6%) max: 7.51 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 102% 100% 105%
min: 5.18 avg: 13.3 median: 11.7 (13%) max: 28.8 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 134% 128% 135% 142% 124% 138% 100% 124% 127% 128% 128%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 27.9 avg: 33 median: 33 (25%) max: 38.1 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 26 W TDP 41 W 73% 100%
min: 17.8 avg: 28.2 median: 24.7 (18%) max: 67 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 26 W TDP 41 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 31% 100% 42% 57% 44% 42% 27% 29% 27% 36% 36%
Average Benchmarks unknown → 100% n=11 Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 165H → 439% n=11 Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 458% n=11
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 14. 03:58:12
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 16905 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731553092s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.005s
#9 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.114s ... 0.12s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16905 +0.004s ... 0.124s
#11 got single benchmarks 16905 +0.006s ... 0.13s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.004s ... 0.135s
#13 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.027s ... 0.162s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.162s
#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.052s ... 0.214s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.221s
#17 return log +0s ... 0.221s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte