ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:2375

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected)

ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:9963

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) Vivante GC800 vs
Notebookcheck Logo

Vivante GC800 vs

► remove from comparison

Vivante GC800

► remove from comparison

Die Vivante GC800 ist ein Grafikkern für ARM (Rockchip RK291x) und MIPS (Actions ATM701x) SoCs. Sie bietet einen VEC-4 (bzw 4 VEC-1) unified Shader und unterstützt OpenGL ES 2.0 (optional ES 3.0), OpenGL 2.0, OpenVG 1.1, DirectX 9_3 (optional) und OpenCL 1.2 (optional). Die Taktrate kann von 315 und 575 MHz (40nm Prozess) bis zu 800 MHz (28nm Prozess) betragen. 

  • Single Core Unified Shader (32-bit SIMD Vec4)
  • Geometry 35 M / Tri/s
  • Texture Pixel Rate 325 M Pix/s
  • 6 GFLOPS Processing
  • Syntehsis Area 1.2 mm2
  • Silicon 2.5 mm2
  • Adobe Flash / Air Acceleration
  • vivantecorp.com/Product_Brief.pdf

GC800

40nm LP

40nm G+

Synthesis Gate Count (ND2D1 gates) 

2.04 M

2.0 M

Memory Bits

65.3 KB

64 KB

Synthesis Area (std. cells + memory) 

1.74 mm2

1.89 mm2

Silicon Area 

2.31 mm2

2.5 mm2

Clock Frequency in Silicon

315 MHz

575 MHz

Active Power 

64.85 mW

54 mW

Geometry Rate

31.5 M tri/s

57 M tri/s

Pixel Rate, Depth-only

315 M pix/s

575 M pix/s

Pixel Rate, Textured

315 M pix/s

575 M pix/s

Vertex Rate

157.5 M vert/s

287 M vert/s

► remove from comparison

show full text
Vivante GC800
Serie
VideoCore VII
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
Shared Memoryja
Pipelines1 - unified
Kerntakt315 - 575 (Boost) MHz
APIOpenGL ES 2.0
Herstellungsprozess28 nm
Erscheinungsdatum01.01.2012
Herstellerseitewww.vivantecorp.com
CPU in GC800GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Rockchip RK29181 x 1000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 x 1000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
100%
1  +
1415 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
100%
1  +
1257 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
100%
1  +
260552 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
100%
1  +
18705 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
100%
1  +
27236 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
100%
1  +
4075 Points (7%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
100%
1 GC800 +
1899 Points (66%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
100%
1 GC800 +
3546 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
100%
1 GC800 +
4199 Points (44%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
100%
1 GC800 +
29.1 fps (48%)
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
100%
1 GC800 +
59.8 fps (89%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
100%
1  +
1254 Points (27%)
100%
1 GC800 +
min: 1254     avg: 1911     median: 1259 (27%)     max: 3219 Points

Average Benchmarks → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC800 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
:
56  fps

Average Gaming → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 256
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps






1










Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

v1.28
log 14. 17:37:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2375 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3156 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9963 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731602234s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 2375 +0.03s ... 0.032s

#10 got single benchmarks 2375 +0.063s ... 0.095s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 3156 +0s ... 0.095s

#12 got single benchmarks 3156 +0.003s ... 0.099s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9963 +0s ... 0.099s

#14 got single benchmarks 9963 +0s ... 0.099s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.099s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.105s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.105s

#18 Got 1 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.108s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.108s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.108s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.109s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.109s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.109s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)