Realme C11
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 11 Bewertungen (aus 40 Tests)
Testberichte für das Realme C11
Quelle: Nextpit Germany Archive.org version
Das Realme C11 bietet für knapp 100 Euro einen ziemlich lückenhaften Funktionsumfang und schneidet in puncto Leistung ebenfalls mittelmäßig bis schlecht ab. Lediglich der große Akku, die akzeptable Kamera und das schöne Betriebssystem bleiben positiv in Erinnerung. Das ist schade, machte der neue Mediatek-Prozessor ganz zu Beginn noch große Hoffnungen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.10.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Realme C11 comes in second among the Essential devices in this comparison for autonomy (and second overall), offering 58 hours of average use, and more than three days with light use. Where it struggles is with charging, as its included 10W charger and micro-USB cord (instead of the USB-C cord like its competitors) simply cannot fill up its large 5000 mAh battery quickly nor efficiently.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 61%
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE Archive.org version
The Realme C11 comes with a price tag of Rs 7,499 and it is definitely a good buy for users who are graduating from a feature phone to a smartphone. The device offers good looks, decent display, dual camera, and not to miss a massive 5000mAh battery. The only feature lacking is the fingerprint sensor. Still, the smartphone is more or less a complete package and has the power to give competition to other smartphones in this price segment. Still, if you are looking at the alternatives then you can consider the recently launched Honor 9S which retails at Rs 6,499.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.08.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE Archive.org version
Overall, we don’t have complaints on this device. It is powered by a gaming chipset good for casual gaming. Or you can just use it for media consumption, or better yet, for those who need a device for their online classes, you’ve got all-day battery life. A good connection may still vary depending on your location. But for us, using mobile data works fine. And for the price of P4,990 (2GB+32GB), there’s nothing to complain about. The phone works, the phone operates smoothly thanks to the realme UI. It has everything you need. Browsing, gaming, media consumption, and a decent acceptable camera at a very low price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.08.2020
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
After a long period of discounts and price wars between smartphone manufacturers, we're seeing costs rise across the industry. Several models have had their prices increased just weeks or months after launch, which of course means that a lot of calculations and comparisons have to be reworked before you can make a buying decision. It is without doubt frustrating that the Realme C11 is more expensive and less powerful than the Realme C3 and Narzo 10A were at the times of their launch.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE Archive.org version
The realme C11 features a MediaTek Helio G35 chipset which is an entry-level gaming chipset, 2GB of RAM, and 32GB of internal storage. Besides that, it comes with a 6.5-inch mini-drop Fullscreen with a 720p display and a ratio of 20:9. Furthermore, the battery is 5000mAh and supports reverse charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 24.07.2020
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
The Realme C11 is a phone aimed at people with really limited budgets, and for that particular crowd, the phone offers quite decent value. If you’re simply looking for a device to use for e-learning or distance learning for your kids, then the Realme C11 is a good phone to consider.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.07.2020
Quelle: Gadget Diary EN→DE Archive.org version
The Realme C11 lacks in processing power, but it gets a durable battery and fairly decent cameras for daylight images. Plus, the Realme C11 cuts the monotony that has crept into the affordable smartphones over time as it comes in refreshing back design. Nevertheless, we would have liked to see a 3GB RAM variant with 64GB storage. The absence of a fingerprint scanner may not go down well with some customers knowing that Realme’s Narzo 10 series, slotted just above the Realme C11, comes with it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.07.2020
Quelle: Yugatech Archive.org version
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.07.2020
Quelle: Manila Shaker Archive.org version
For those who need a device for their online schooling, the Helio G35 inside this Realme C11 is not just an entry-level gaming chipset it also has MediaTek HyperEngine Connectivity Enhancements means that it has a faster response and more reliable connections to ensure you can always stay connected. The large 5000mAh battery can give you a day or two. Great for online schooling and gaming. So we tested Realme C11 in network speed comparison and in gaming. The quick game test includes PUBG Mobile, Mobile Legends, and Call of Duty Mobile. We also showed the battery life and battery drain test results of this device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.07.2020
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE Archive.org version
For a phone that’s well designed, has great battery life and boasts a very capable processor, the realme C11 is a good choice for those who want a well balanced device that has decent gaming performance for a bargain price. The Realme C3 is priced at Php4,990 (2GB + 32GB) and is available in all official online store in Shopee.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.07.2020
Quelle: Fone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
Realme C11 is priced at Rs. 7499 for the single 2GB+32GB variant and comes in Rich Green and Rich Gray color options. The C11 scores high on design and the overall aesthetics, but falls short in performance. The low RAM is definitely a bottleneck and doesn’t give the best user experience. On the other side, the battery life is solid and the optics are quite good as well. That said, we would recommend you to spend a bit more and get the realme Narzo 10A instead as it offers far better and smooth performance along with better security with a physical fingerprint scanner. You can check out the review of Narzo 10A here.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.07.2020
Quelle: India Today EN→DE Archive.org version
Realme C11 gets plenty of things right for its class. It has a good display that produces bright colours. Its cameras manage to deliver beautiful shots in daylight but struggle a bit when the light conditions take a turn. The portrait shots are decent enough. And, finally, the 5000mAh battery on the Realme C11 is one of the strongest points about it. The battery can last for more than one and a half days, which is more than impressive about a smartphone that has Android 10 and other nifty features under the hood.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
Lower prices are always good, especially at a time when we're seeing frequent price hikes to existing models. We're interested in seeing whether Realme has managed to strike a balance between affordability and ease of use. We'll take some time to evaluate the Realme C11's performance, battery life, cameras, software, and much more, so do stay tuned to Gadgets 360 for our full review, coming up soon.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.07.2020
Quelle: El Androide Libre ES→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; long battery life; nice display; decent processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.08.2020
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Excellent display; support both dual SIM and microSD card slot; large battery capacity; solid workmanship. Negative: Poor cameras; low performance; mediocre speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.08.2021
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.11.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.10.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful display; great built quality. Negative: Only microUSB port; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 20.10.2020
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.08.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Antyweb PL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; large battery capacity; decent cameras; support both dual SIM and memory card slot; low price. Negative: Weak processor; only microUSB port; no fingerprint reader; no NFC; no 5GHz Wifi.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.09.2020
Quelle: Chip Online TR TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.09.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Product Test RU→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.09.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 76% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 86%
Quelle: Ferra.ru RU→DE
Positive: Good price; high performance; bright display; decent autonomy; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.08.2021
Quelle: Mega Obzor RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice display; decent processor; good face unlock; great cameras; impressive autonomy. Negative: No USB-C; no NFC.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.08.2020
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.10.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Leistung: 71% Ausstattung: 62% Mobilität: 91% Gehäuse: 83%
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; nice triple cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; good hardware; beautiful design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.08.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; big screen; powerful processor; large battery capacity; nice AI cameras; support both dual SIM and memory card slot.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.07.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; big screen; beautiful design; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.07.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; long battery life; nice dual cameras; big screen; decent performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.07.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; great built quality; large battery capacity; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.07.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; long battery life; decent performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.07.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; big screen; low price; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.07.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; beautiful design; nice cameras; decent performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.07.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; decent hardware; impressive battery life. Negative: Mediocre display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.07.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice dual cameras; large battery capacity; good price; big screen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.07.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; decent hardware; low price; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.07.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; excellent cameras; long battery life; low price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.07.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; large battery capacity; nice dual cameras; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.07.2020
Quelle: Jagat Review ID→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Decent hardware; nice gaming performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.07.2020
Kommentar
Imagination PowerVR GE8320: Integrierter Grafikchip für ARM-Prozessoren der unteren Mittelklasse.
3D Spiele sind auf diesen Vertretern nur in Ausnahmen spielbar, grundsätzlich sind die Grafiklösungen hierfür jedoch nicht geeignet. Office Programme und Internet surfen dürfte jedoch ohne Problem möglich sein.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
unknown: » Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
6.50": Es handelt sich um ein kleines Display-Format für Smartphones. Man sollte nicht stark fehlsichtig sein und man wird wenig Details am Bildschirm sehen und nur eine kleine Auflösung zur Verfügung haben. Dafür sollte das Gerät klein und handlich sein, gut transportierbar.» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.
0.196 kg:
In diese Gewichtsklasse fallen die meisten Smartphones und nur vereinzelt Tablets. Nur wenige Smartphones sind schwerer und eher als Tablets anzusehen.
Realme: Realme ist ein chinesischer Smartphone-Hersteller, der im Jahr 2018 gegründet wurde. Das Unternehmen ist eine Tochtergesellschaft von Oppo, einem anderen chinesischen Smartphone-Hersteller. Dieser ist ein Tochterunternehmen von BBK Electronic Corporation, einem riesigen chinesischen Elektronikkonzern, zu dem auch OnePlus und Vivo gehören.
Realme konzentriert sich auf die Herstellung von Smartphones und wurde besonders in Indien populär. Neben Smartphones stellt Realme auch andere Produkte der Unterhaltungselektronik her, wie Smartwatches, Kopfhörer und Powerbanks.
70.64%: Diese Bewertung ist schlecht. Locker drei Viertel der Modelle werden besser beurteilt. Das ist eher keine Kaufempfehlung. Auch wenn Verbalbewertungen in diesem Bereich gar nicht so schlecht klingen ("genügend" oder "befriedigend"), meist sind es Euphemismen, die eine Klassifikation als unterdurchschnittliches Notebook verschleiern.
» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.