Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-14500T vs Intel Core i9-14900

Intel Core i5-14500T

Der Intel Core i5-14500T ist ein sehr sparsamer Desktop-Prozessor auf Basis der Raptor-Lake-Architektur, die bereits im Oktober 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor bietet einen Basistakt von 1,7 GHz und erreicht bis zu 4,6 GHz im Turbo. Die hybride CPU-Architektur, welche mit Alder-Lake eingeführt wurde, kommt auch den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren zugute. Der Namenszusatz T steht hierbei für ein besonders sparsames CPU-Modell und mit einer TDP von nur 35 Watt (PL1 = 35 Watt) sind diese Prozessoren für kleine, kompakte Systeme bestens geeignet.

Performance

Die geringe Leistungsaufnahme sorgt schlussendlich für eine etwas geringere Leistung im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-14500. Je nachdem, wie das PL2 (92 Watt) definiert ist, kann es bei der Multi-Core-Leistung spürbare Unterschiede geben. Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-12500T ist der Intel Core i5-14500T aufgrund der höheren Anzahl an physischen Rencheneinheiten überlegen. Gegenüber dem Intel Core i5-13500T gibt es aufgrund der gleichen Anzahl an Recheneinheiten keinen spürbaren Leistungszuwachs.

Grafikeinheit

Wie auch der Intel Core i5-13500T bietet der Intel Core i5-14500T eine integrierte Grafikeinheit. Als Basis dient weiterhin die Intel Iris Xe-Architektur. Rein leistungstechnisch hat sich bei der neuen Intel UHD Graphics 770 aber nicht viel verändert. Die iGPU des Intel Core i5-14500T taktet zudem 100 MHz höher, was aber keinen spürbaren Unterschied im Alltag ergibt.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP des Intel Core i5-14500T beläuft sich auf 35 Watt, mit der Option, diese im Turbo auf bis zu 92 Watt zu erhöhen. Gegenüber dem Intel Core i5-13500T hat sich bei der Leistungsaufnahme nichts verändert.

Intel Core i9-14900

► remove from comparison

ModelIntel Core i5-14500TIntel Core i9-14900
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-RIntel Raptor Lake-R
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
Serie: Raptor Lake-R Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-14900K compare3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K compare2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 cores
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 compare2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T « 1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900K compare3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K compare2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 «  cores
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 compare2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock1700 - 4800 MHz
L2 Cache11.5 MB
L3 Cache24 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 20
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP35 Watt
TDP Turbo PL292 Watt
Technology10 nm
Die Size215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86
$232 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-14500T
38.3 pt (63%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900
47.7 pt (79%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
103 Points (72%)
129 Points (90%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
630 Points (12%)
1245 Points (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11790 Points (11%)
31070 Points (29%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1838 Points (78%)
2212 Points (94%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
706 Points (78%)
846 Points (94%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4319 Points (11%)
11291 Points (28%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2022 Points (13%)
4793 Points (30%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (73%)
315 Points (91%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.6 Points (28%)
56.6 Points (74%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (78%)
3.8 Points (94%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9014 Points (54%)
12284 Points (74%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
39798 Points (29%)
82492 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
63443 Points (44%)
121768 Points (84%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14402 Points (18%)
17590 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
221.3 s (3%)
85.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.8 s (1%)
2.4 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6846 Points (11%)
12359 Points (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
45820 MIPS (26%)
101652 MIPS (58%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5980 MIPS (71%)
7276 MIPS (87%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
108.1 fps (38%)
222 fps (77%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
264.5 fps (61%)
358.5 fps (83%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.7 fps (22%)
31.6 fps (56%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (31%)
2.4 GB/s (73%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
4.9 GB/s (84%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.8 GB/s (26%)
18.5 GB/s (48%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
513 Seconds (7%)
263 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
288 Seconds (2%)
131 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
0.4 sec (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12986 Points (28%)
18728 Points (40%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
5.8 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
12.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
408.8 s (2%)
303.4 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
54226 Points (47%)
93183 Points (82%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15309 Points (41%)
28622 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
73013 Points (59%)
88787 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
72147 Points (59%)
90442 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79337 Points (67%)
93001 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
14441 Points (37%)
20179 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
20354 Points (36%)
42316 Points (75%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8496 Points (36%)
19492 Points (82%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2546 Points (69%)
3022 Points (81%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
9225 Points (36%)
15962 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1838 Points (73%)
2140 Points (85%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
9122 Points (16%)
17395 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1782 Points (8%)
2077 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8987 Points (28%)
17218 Points (54%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7611 Points (76%)
9143 Points (91%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
33122 Points (36%)
67178 Points (74%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
554 ms (1%)
436 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
244 Points (70%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
262 Points (55%)
315 Points (66%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1493 Points (57%)
2133 Points (82%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.1 Watt (10%)
145.5 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
79.8 Watt (15%)
253 Watt (46%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8 Watt (5%)
29.9 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
25.3 Points per Watt (19%)
18.9 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-14500T → 100% n=51

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900 → 171% n=51

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 19. 17:59:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18026 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18150 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726761548s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:16:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18026 +0.004s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 18026 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18150 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 18150 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.05s ... 0.068s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.071s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)