Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix FOV 105°, FocusFrame, video recording up to 1080p@30fps
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 30 Bewertungen (aus 50 Tests)
Testberichte für das Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mit dem Redmi Pad stellt Xiaomi sein erstes Tablet aus der Redmi-Serie vor. Das bedeutet, dass beim 10,6-Zöller ein niedriger Preis und eine gute Ausstattung zum Pflichtprogramm gehören. Im Test legt das Redmi Tab mit Features wie einem 90-Hz-Display, einem schicken Metallgehäuse und langen Akkulaufzeiten ordentlich vor, offenbart aber auch ein paar Schwächen.
Quelle: India Today EN→DE
After spending a good amount of time with the Poco Pad 5G, I can say it’s a solid tablet that offers a lot for its price. It’s not perfect—the LCD screen isn't as vibrant as an OLED, and it’s not the best for high-end gaming—but it handles everyday tasks really well. The large 12-inch display is great for watching videos. The sound quality is impressive too, making it feel like you’re watching on a mini TV. The tablet’s performance is smooth for most activities, and the battery life is fantastic—it’ll easily last you a full day of heavy use. Plus, with support for a keyboard and Smart Pen, there’s potential to do a lot more on this device, from casual work tasks to browsing the web.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.08.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Root Nation EN→DE
Personally, I think that Redmi Pad is a very balanced and organic device. It has a classic design, a good screen, high battery life, and good cameras. It doesn’t have any incredible exceptional features, but it doesn’t have a single failure or significant drawback. It is a very marketable product that aims to satisfy all the needs of a middle-class user. The difficulty is how to stand out from the competition in such circumstances, but for some reason you have read this far. In short, this tablet is definitely worth a look as a purchase option for the most utilitarian tasks.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.04.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 90% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
Redmi Tab seems like a well-thought project that materialised the way Xiaomi wanted it to. It not only impressed the first-time users in our office and home but also left a good impression on us. While the competition is tough in this price segment, the Redmi Pad has all the necessary ingredients and support of some nifty features to easily impress potential buyers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: GSM Choice EN→DE
Despite this, the Redmi Pad also has a lot of advantages - it offers quite good performance for tablet applications, and above all, it does not get hot. In addition, it has good 4 speakers and a not bad battery, takes decent photos and looks really beautiful. The whole thing together is really digestible, but once again I will repeat - rather to use at home. As a device that we grab from time to time to read or watch a video, this tablet is the most noteworthy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.11.2022
Quelle: Igeekphone EN→DE
The Redmi Pad is the longest-lasting Android device we’ve tested in the last year. The measured battery life is 16 hours, and the continuous playback of 1080P video at station B can last for 18 hours. This figure is roughly 1.5 times that of today’s mainstream mobile phones. In the case of medium and heavy use, it can basically be charged every 2 days. The charging performance is relatively average, and it takes 135 minutes to charge from 0 to 100%. However, considering its long battery life, even if it is used under high load, the number of charging times per week is not much. 10.6-inch 90Hz high-refresh screen, 6+2GB memory, 128GB UFS 2.2 flash memory, 8000mAh large-capacity battery, and 4 speakers. As an entry-level tablet, Redmi Pad has almost no obvious shortcomings in configuration.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.11.2022
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
Wrapping up this review, Xiaomi has clearly scored another winner with its latest budget tablet. The company has struck a fine balance between affordability, usability, and features, making the Redmi Pad the best budget tablet in the market right now. Other than the software limitations on the base variant and a few other minor drawbacks, this is an excellent budget tablet. And the one to beat for other new newcomers. Redmi has scored a winner with its first attempt at a budget Android tablet. It has struck a fine balance between affordability, usability, and features with the Redmi Pad, making it the best budget tablet in the market right now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 90% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE
The Redmi Pad has the makings of a decent tablet for entertainment. It has a premium design, a nice screen, immersive speakers, and a big battery. It is competitively priced too at PHP 13,999 for the 4GB + 128GB, and PHP 14,999 for the 6GB + 128GB. It’s positioned better compared to its competitors from other brands. However, it’s priced too close to its cousin the Xiaomi Pad 5. The 6GB + 128GB is now priced at PHP 15,999 and has a better display with a higher refresh rate, a more powerful Snapdragon 860 chipset, faster UFS 3.1 storage, a better camera, and an even bigger battery with faster charging. In this case, I’d recommend just bumping the budget a bit for this one so you can get more hardware for the price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.10.2022
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Redmi Pad, with all its hardware and software features, is certainly my obvious recommendation for anyone looking to buy an Android tablet under Rs. 20,000. With a capable performance unit, a big battery and a large screen, the Redmi Pad is suitable for a majority of use cases, including gaming. I would recommend buying the 4GB RAM variant or possibly even the 6GB RAM variant. You not only get more storage but also the assurance of a smoother user experience. Some of the key MIUI 13 for Pad features such as split screen, floating windows, multi-window, etc, are not available on the 3GB RAM variant, so it makes sense to skip it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
Save for a somewhat limited multi-window implementation in software (and let's face it, not everyone even cares about multi-window), we can hardly think of any glaring issue with the Redmi Pad. Well, the rather low-spec 64GB/3GB version is to be avoided (this one doesn't support multi-window at all, mind you), but other than that, we see no reason not to recommend the higher tiers (128GB/4GB or 128GB/6GB). It's got one of the best displays you can get for the money - it's as bright as the rest of them at this price point but has no pesky contrast shifts, and it's 90Hz amongst 60Hz competitors. Battery life is towards the top of the class, and the speakers are very good too. On the outside, the metal unibody lends it an air of premiumness. Overall, the Redmi Pad is one of the nicest all-around packages if you're looking for a midrange tablet.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76%
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
When it comes to picking a tablet, software and hardware both play a critical role. With the Redmi Pad, both work well in sync, though the performance is perhaps not all that it is hyped up to be. Where I think the Redmi Pad enjoys an advantage compared to some others I have reviewed with a similar price tag is with the battery and the display. If you are looking for a budget tablet, the Redmi Pad delivers well for the price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Times of India EN→DE
After spending more than a week with the Redmi Pad, I can say that the company has set the bar for budget tablets. Priced under Rs. 15000, it surprisingly offers better performance and experience than any other tablet in this range. Even compared to more expensive Android tablets, this one offers much better value, and an excellent tablet experience. Considering everything, it is indeed the best option we can recommend for less than Rs. 20000.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
Xiaomi recently launched a tablet called the Xiaomi Redmi Pad, which arrived with a price tag of $240 (Rs 19,999 in India) approx. The Redmi Pad comes with a tall 10.61-inches IPS LCD display panel with a 90Hz refresh rate, and 1B colors support. The device will be available in 3GB/4GB/6GB RAM configurations with 64GB/128GB internal storage and will run on the latest Android 12 OS with the MIUI 13.1 user interface. Under the hood, you’ll find a 6nm MediaTek Helio G99 chipset with Mali-G57 MC2 GPU. In terms of the camera setup, you will receive a single 8MP rear camera, while an 8MP ultrawide selfie port is present on the front screen. The Redmi Pad is expected to be available in Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, and Mint Green color variants. For the battery section, you will get a massive Li-Po 8000mAh battery with 18W fast charging support.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.10.2022
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE
This is pretty much the budget tablet everyone has been waiting for since the tablet market revived after the pandemic. Those who find an iPad way too expensive finally have a tablet that looks good, works well, and comes with a price tag that is right out of 2015! Redmi Pad review: At its starting price of Rs 12,999, the Redmi Pad is hands-down the best value-for-money tablet in the Indian market right now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Redmi Pad is undoubtedly one of the most value-for-money offerings in the budget tablet market. And, the proof is in the pudding too and the device is backed by a 90Hz 2K panel, a powerful SoC, and quad-speakers tuned by Dolby Atmos. Now, I would’ve liked to see a fingerprint sensor and a headphone jack with the device. Furthermore, the tablet doesn’t support 4G connectivity either. Putting all that aside, the starting price for the Redmi Pad is highly competitive at Rs 14,999, which makes it the tablet to beat in the market.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Mobygyaan EN→DE
The Redmi Pad has most features that a tablet user demands, it has a large 10.61-inch display, higher 2K+ resolution with 10-bit color depth (1B colors), 90 Hz display, quad speakers with support for Dolby Atmos and Hi-Res Audio, as well as a fast processor from MediaTek. The Redmi Pad packs a 6nm MediaTek Helio G99 SoC with up to 6 GB RAM and 128 GB storage which means it’s backed up with good hardware, delivers a decent performance, and offers a great battery life (8,000 mAh). If you are looking for a tablet in the ₹15k budget, you won’t go wrong with the Redmi Pad, it has everything you need in a tablet, the Redmi Pad is recommended buy, the price starts at ₹12,999 (3 GB RAM and 64 GB storage).
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.10.2022
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Redmi Pad competes against a bunch of Android tablets priced under Rs. 20,000. With the kind of hardware it offers, the Redmi Pad definitely looks promising on paper, however, the spec sheet only tells one part of the story. How does it perform in day-to-day life? For that, stay tuned for the full review of the Redmi Pad coming soon, on Gadgets 360.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 93% Gehäuse: 88%
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Great display; elegant design; powerful processor; long battery life; Widevine L1. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 31.12.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; elegant design; powerful processor; large battery capacity; Widevine L1. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 26.04.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful screen; elegant design; powerful processor; large battery capacity; Widevine L1. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 16.04.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; stylish design; decent processor; long battery life; Widevine L1. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 12.03.2023
Quelle: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great ergonomics; bright display; powerful processor; fast charging. Negative: Average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.02.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; elegant design; decent processor; long battery life. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 29.12.2022
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; elegant design; powerful processor; long battery life. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 24.10.2022
Quelle: PC Guia PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 12.05.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 66%
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Decent performance; nice display; good speakers; modern design; great built quality. Negative: Many bloadtwares.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.11.2022
Quelle: Target HD PT→DE
Positive: Impressive display; powerful processor; high performance; long battery life; premium design; metal case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.10.2022
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 75% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: Everyeye.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→DE
Positive: Decent hardware; nice performance; excellent display; long battery life; great speakers; metal case; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.11.2022
Quelle: Diskidee.nl NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72%
Quelle: Want.nl NL→DE
Positive: Very long battery life; quick charging; nice display; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.12.2022
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 100% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Presse Citron FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 90% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Positive: Good price; original design; large battery capacity; decent processor; nice performance. Negative: Slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.10.2022
Quelle: GSM Maniak PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.03.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Leistung: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: MobilArena HU HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.12.2022
Bewertung: Preis: 70% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; solid workmanship; beautiful display; high performance; nice selfie camera; very long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.10.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; good speakers; nice performance; large battery capacity; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.10.2022
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 08.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 04.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 68%
Quelle: M3 PC för alla SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Unlimited Tech →DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Kommentar
ARM Mali-G57 MP2: Integrierte Grafikkarte der Mittelklasse mit 2 Kernen / Clustern (MC2 oder MP2) basierend auf die Valhall Architektur.
Diese Karten können nur sehr alte und sehr anspruchslose 3D Spiele flüssig darstellen. Anwendungen wie Office, Internet surfen, Bildbearbeitung oder (SD) Videoschnitt sind jedoch ohne große Einschränkungen möglich.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
Helio G99: ARM-basierter Octa-Core-SoC (2x Cortex-A76, 6x Cortex-A55) mit 64-Bit-Unterstützung und bis zu 2,2 GHz Taktrate für Smartphones und Tablets. Integriert ein Cat-13 4G LTE Modem. Im Unterschied zum MediaTek Helio G96, wird der G99 im moderneren 6nm Prozess gefertigt und taktet höher.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
10.61": Dies ist ein Standardanzeigeformat für Tablet-Computer oder kleine Convertibles. Man sieht mehr auf diesem Bildschirm als auf einem kleinen Smartphone. Große Auflösungen darf man aber nicht erwarten. Auf der anderen Seite ist die Mobilität kein Problem.» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.
0.445 kg:
In diesem Gewichtsbereich liegen ein paar schwere Smartphones und vor allem Tablets.
Xiaomi:
Die 2010 gegründete Xiaomi Corporation ist ein chinesisches multinationales Elektronikunternehmen und produziert Unterhaltungselektronik und verwandte Produkte, darunter Smartphones, Fernsehgeräte, Fitnessbänder, Power Banks, Kopfhörer, intelligente Geräte und Zubehör. Xiaomi bietet seine Produkte unter den Marken Mi, Redmi und POCO an.
79.29%: Weltbewegend ist diese Bewertung nicht. Diese Bewertung muss man eigentlich als unterdurchschnittlich ansehen, denn es gibt etwa ebenso mehr Geräte mit schlechtere Beurteilungen als Besseren. Eine Kaufempfehlung kann man nur mit viel Wohlwollen darin sehen, es sei denn es handelt sich um Websites, die generell streng urteilen.
» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.