Notebookcheck Logo

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs unknown

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

unknown

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950unknown
Series
CodenameCortex-A9
Serie:
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Google Tensor G4 compare1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown «  cores
Clock1000 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 1
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.tw

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
5778 Points (68%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1343 Points (34%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
4370 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1006 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
3951 Points (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
min: 836.4     avg: 10153     median: 14670 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
2410 ms (23%)
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 13727     median: 2773.5 (2%)     max: 46687 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 unknown +
160 Points (45%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 unknown +
200 Points (37%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
714538 Points (43%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 unknown +
197906 Points (54%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 unknown +
13858 Points (58%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 unknown +
1028 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 unknown +
9.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 unknown +
5.5 Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks unknown → 37% n=3

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 16. 17:49:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731775775s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.029s

#8 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.004s ... 0.034s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.034s

#10 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.116s ... 0.151s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.151s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.161s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.162s

#14 return log +0.002s ... 0.164s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)