Notebookcheck Logo

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs unknown vs HiSilicon Kirin 910

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison  WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

HiSilicon Kirin 910

► remove from comparison

Der HiSilicon Kirin 910 ist ein ARM-basierter Quad-Core-SoC für (Android-)Smartphones und Tablets, der Anfang 2014 zusammen mit dem Huawei Ascend P6S vorgestellt wurde. Neben vier Cortex-A9-Kernen (max. 1,6 GHz) integriert der Chip auch eine Mali-450 MP4 Grafikeinheit, einen Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600-Speichercontroller sowie ein LTE Cat. 4 Modem. Einziger Unterschied zum Kirin 910T ist damit der 200 MHz niedrigere CPU-Takt.

Die CPU-Performance ordnet sich dank der hochtaktenden Cortex-A9-Kerne im Mittelfeld ein, sodass der 910T in etwa mit einem Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (1,5 - 1,7 GHz Krait) vergleichbar ist. Dies genügt, um Browsing und andere typische Android-Anwendungen zügig zu bewältigen.

Die mit 533 MHz taktende Mali-450 MP4 sorgt für eine ansprechende Grafikleistung knapp auf dem Niveau der Qualcomm Adreno 320. Damit werden auch anspruchsvolle Android-Spiele in hoher Auflösung zumeist flüssig dargestellt.

Trotz Fertigung in einem aktuellen 28-Nanometer-Prozess (TSMC HPM) dürfte die Leistungsaufnahme des Kirin 910 nur durchschnittlich ausfallen, was auf die vergleichsweise hohen Taktraten zurückzuführen ist. Demzufolge kann der SoC in mittelgroßen Smartphones, aber auch Tablets eingesetzt werden.

ModelWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950unknownHiSilicon Kirin 910
Series
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9
Serie: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown «  cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 « 1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1000 MHz1600 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 14 / 4
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP
ArchitectureARMx86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.tw
Technology28 nm
FeaturesARMv7, Mali-450 MP4 (533 MHz), LTE (Cat. 4), Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (6.4 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 9720     avg: 9785     median: 9784.5 (8%)     max: 9849 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 9766     avg: 9884     median: 9883.5 (8%)     max: 10001 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (31%)
min: 8327     avg: 9920     median: 9920 (8%)     max: 11513 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
5778 Points (68%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1343 Points (34%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
4370 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1006 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
3951 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1452     avg: 1548     median: 1547.5 (3%)     max: 1643 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 481     avg: 509     median: 509 (10%)     max: 537 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
622 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1753 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2784 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1575 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1938 Points (5%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
13 MFLOPS (0%)
202 MFLOPS (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
62.8 MFLOPS (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
min: 836.4     avg: 10153     median: 14670 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
22419 ms (26%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
2410 ms (23%)
7004 ms (66%)
1217 ms (12%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1277     avg: 1361     median: 1360.5 (15%)     max: 1444 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 13727     median: 2773.5 (2%)     max: 46687 Points
min: 1467     avg: 1535     median: 1535 (1%)     max: 1603 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 unknown +
160 Points (45%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 unknown +
200 Points (37%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
874 Points (23%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1200 Points (27%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1973 Points (26%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
5563 points (13%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
min: 21467     avg: 21865     median: 21864.5 (51%)     max: 22262 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
714538 Points (43%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 unknown +
197906 Points (54%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
537 Iter./s (17%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
11881 Iter./s (39%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
11258 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 unknown +
13858 Points (58%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
2019 Points (10%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 unknown +
1028 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 unknown +
9.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 unknown +
5.5 Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks unknown → 37% n=3

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 910 → 340% n=3

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 16. 20:05:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 6344 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731783930s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#9 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#11 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.116s ... 0.125s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 6344 +0.001s ... 0.125s

#13 got single benchmarks 6344 +0.004s ... 0.129s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.129s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.02s ... 0.148s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.15s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.15s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)