Notebookcheck Logo

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs Renesas MP5232

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

Renesas MP5232

► remove from comparison MP5232

Der Renesas MP5232 ist ein günstiger Dual-Core ARM SoC mit LTE Unterstützung. Er zielt hauptsächlich auf Einstiegs-LTE-Smartphones mit Android im Bereich von 150 - 300 Euro ab. Als Prozessorpart sind zwei ARM Cortex-A9 mit bis zu 1.5 GHz integriert. Im Samsung Galaxy Core LTE SM-G386F werden diese jedoch z.B. nur mit maximal 1.2 GHz betrieben. Weiters findet man eine PowerVR SGX544 Grafikkarte und die oben erwähnten LTE Cat. 4 und 3G (DC-HSPA+, Edge) Einheiten im SoC. Auch ein integrierter 1080p Video De- und Encoder, 20 MP ISP und Audio Subsystem sind im MP5232 verbaut.

Quellen: Test Samsung Galaxy Core LTE SM-G386F, Renesas

show full text
ModelWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950Renesas MP5232
Series
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9
Serie: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1000 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 12 / 2
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.twwww.renesas.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 MP5232 +
4163 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 MP5232 +
4147 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MP5232 +
654 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MP5232 +
373 Points (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
70.2 MFLOPS (2%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
11.7 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MP5232 +
21760 ms (25%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
2410 ms (23%)
1480 ms (14%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 MP5232 +
1525 ms (17%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 MP5232 +
1547 Points (1%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
2140 points (5%)
3959 points (9%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 MP5232 +
12246 Points (28%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MP5232 +
209 Iter./s (6%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MP5232 +
4260 Iter./s (14%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 MP5232 +
4557 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Renesas MP5232 → 152% n=4

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 13. 10:50:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5844 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731491431s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.029s

#8 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5844 +0.001s ... 0.033s

#10 got single benchmarks 5844 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.044s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.047s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)