Vivo X60 Pro
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.5, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm)
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 54 Bewertungen (aus 97 Tests)
Testberichte für das Vivo X60 Pro
Das X60 Pro startet mit Zeiss Linsen und einem neuen Gimbal-Kamerasystem. Ob die Zusammenarbeit mit dem deutschen Traditionshersteller die klassische OIS-Stabilisierung vergessen macht oder mehr zu Marketing-Zwecken dient, erfahren Sie in unserem Testbericht zum Vivo Handy.
Quelle: Tech Stage
Schick ist es, das Vivo X60 Pro, vor allem flach und leicht. Weitere Pluspunkte sind das tolle OLED-Display, viel Speicher, sehr gute Alltags-Performance und eine Kamera, die unterm Strich in Ordnung ist.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.10.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Go2 Mobile
Das Vivo X60 Pro ist ein rundum gelungenes Semi-Flaggschiff-Smartphone. Mit 799 Euro als noch recht unbekanntes Unternehmen in Deutschland einfach zu teuer.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Preis: 62% Leistung: 79% Mobilität: 84% Gehäuse: 87%
Quelle: Allround-PC.com
Vivo hat einige Punkte beim X60 Pro gegenüber dem Vorgänger verbessert. Neben dem schicken OLED-Display mit 120 Hz sticht besonders die gesteigerte Performance hervor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.07.2021
Quelle: Stadt-bremerhaven
Der Hersteller hat mit dem Gerät ein gutes Smartphone mit einem sehr guten Display, ausreichend Performance und einer guten Kamera, die aber nicht sehr gut ist, auf den Markt geworfen.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.07.2021
Quelle: Android Mag
Mit dem X60 Pro 5G hat der chinesische Hersteller Vivo hierzulande erst sein zweites Flaggschiff-Modell auf den Markt gebracht, das jedoch mit einer hervorragenden Bildstabilisierung punkten kann.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 94% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 88% Gehäuse: 100%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Vivo X60 Pro ist ein in fast allen Belangen gutes Smartphone geworden. Ein wunderschönes Display, ein schneller Prozessor, eine exzellente Verarbeitungsqualität, ein rundes Design-Konzept und eine gute Kamera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: WinFuture
Der chinesische Hersteller Vivo bringt mit dem X60 Pro 5G sein zweites Flaggschiff-Smartphone auf den deutschen Markt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.06.2021
Quelle: Computerbild
Dank schickem Gehäuse, tollem Display und einzigartiger Bildstabilisierung mausert sich das Vivo X60 Pro zur interessanten Samsung-Alternative. Wer möglichst wackelarme Videos machen will, kommt am Smartphone nicht vorbei. Im Test gefiel auch die klare und reaktionsschnelle Bedienoberfläche, die weniger überladen wirkt als bei so manchem Konkurrent. Ein Nachteil allerdings: Das Gehäuse ist nicht wasserdicht. Alternative: Das OnePlus 9 Pro ist etwa 100 Euro teurer, besitzt dafür dieses Merkmal, ist induktiv ladbar und hat eine bessere Tele-Kamera. Allerdings fehlt die Gimbal-Videostabilisierung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Mit der Gimbal-Kamera bietet Vivo auch in seinem 2021er-Flaggschiff einen USP, den es sonst nirgends gibt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Futurezone.at
Mit dem X60 Pro bringt Vivo ein durch und durch ausgezeichnetes Smartphone nach Österreich, das mich so manches Mal tatsächlich überrascht hat.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.06.2021
Quelle: Inside Handy
Das Vivo X60 Pro 5G ist ein ausgezeichnetes und mit einem Kaufpreis von 799 Euro vergleichsweise preiswertes Flaggschiff-Smartphone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: MobiFlip
Das Vivo X60 Pro ist ein sehr gutes Android-Smartphone, welches sich in der gehobenen Mittelklasse einordnen, hier und da aber Flaggschiff-Level bietet.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon) smoothly adapts to changing light conditions and has accurate color rendering. However, it lacks brightness in most tested conditions, and this has an impact on the user experience, especially when watching HDR10 videos, which lack contrast and appear somewhat flat. Dark tones are missing and a green cast is noticeable. The device has a smooth feel when browsing the web and when gaming. Although the screen reacts accurately when gaming, touch reactivity in the corners is poor, and aliasing is visible.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.05.2022
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) arrived on the market in March 2021. Belonging to our Premium ($600-799) segment, it has a display with a 120 Hz refresh rate and a 240 Hz touch sampling rate, among other nice features. Let’s see how it did in our Battery protocol tests. The Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) put in an above-average performance in our Battery protocol tests. Showing no weaknesses, it takes over the top spot in the Premium segment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.12.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) is the EU version of the mobile phone, which differs from the China-exclusive Exynos version in terms of chipset among other characteristics. The EU model features the Snapdragon 870 chipset with 12 GB RAM and 256 GB storage, runs Android 11, and boasts a 4200 mAh battery with 33W flash charging. The display is a large 6.56-inch FHD+ AMOLED with a 120 Hz refresh rate. For selfies, both the EU and China models use the same front camera module. There’s a 32 MP sensor coupled with an f/2.45 aperture lens. Video is also captured at full HD 1080p at 30 fps resolution.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.11.2021
Quelle: Know Your Mobile EN→DE
The VIVO X60 Pro costs £748, so it is not what you’d call a cheap phone. It’s not even a mid-range phone. It is a flagship phone that costs about as much as the Galaxy S21, the iPhone 12, and the Xiaomi Mi 11. For this amount of money, you expect a few things to be in place, things like an IP rating, solid battery life, and a high-resolution display. You’d also expect to have the best CPU money can buy. But on the VIVO X60 Pro, all of these things are missing. I do like the VIVO X60 Pro and I had a great time testing it but for the asking price, it does fall short in my eyes. If it cost £499, I’d be recommending this phone to everyone. But it doesn’t. And at this price point, the VIVO X60 Pro, with all of its foibles, just isn’t as competitive as the competition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72%
Quelle: GSM Choice EN→DE
Vivo X60 Pro entered European markets just over half a year after the brand's debut on the Old Continent and the launch of quite successful Vivo X51. Is the successor better than the predecessor? You will find out from the following review! At the outset, let me explain that in this review we are talking about the European variant of Vivo X60 Pro, labeled V2046. You must know that there is also a "Chinese" version of this phone, with the same name, but different interface and - more importantly - processor. We got the Snapdragon 870 instead of the Exynos 1080. Unfortunately, along the way, the European variant lost its telephoto camera - making it a bit weaker than its predecessor . But maybe something has also changed for the better...?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.08.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
In 2020, Vivo released the X60 Pro, driven by an Exynos chip, in China. In April of this year, the X60 Pro went global, but this time, it was equipped with the Snapdragon 870 5G chipset. The X60 Pro is one of the brand’s flagships, just downstream from the X60 Pro Plus, with features like a 6.56 inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, a four-camera array, and a fast-charging 4200 mAh (TYP) battery. Vivo’s website does not mention the X60 Pro’s audio specifications, but it has one speaker that is bottom right-side firing.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.08.2021
Quelle: Talk Android EN→DE
On sale in Europe, UK, India, and a few other Asian countries, the Vivo X60 Pro is being sold at £749/€799 which is pretty much the same price as the X51 5G from 2020. This time around, though, there’s a flagship (ish) processor in the form of the Snapdragon 870 which brings a nice performance boost to a svelte-looking handset. The Vivo X60 has its strengths such as the very capable 48MP main camera with Gimbal Stabilization 2.0, a very good AMOLED display, and a stunning design, but there are glaring omissions such as wireless charging, the limited 33W fast-charging speed, an IP rating, and the expensive price tag. Much like the X51 5G, the X60 Pro is a very good phone that is weighed down by its RRP when compared to competitors such as the Galaxy S21 and Mi 11i.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.08.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) is the global release of this device and differs from the China-only Exynos version not only in the chipset but also in the photography specifications, with only a single tele-lens included on the Snapdragon model versus two teles on the model for the Chinese market. The handset features the Snapdragon 870 chipset with 12 GB RAM and 256 GB storage, runs Android 11, and boasts a 4200 mAh battery with 33W flash charging. The display is a large 6.56-inch FHD+ AMOLED with a 120 Hz refresh rate. Aside from dropping the second tele-lens, the camera is the same as in the Exynos version. Co-engineered with Zeiss, the primary camera is built around a 48 MP Quad Bayer sensor (12 MP output) with a f/1.48-aperture lens. Both zoom cameras utilize 13 MP sensors, with a f/2.56-aperture lens on the tele and a f/2.2-aperture lens on the ultra-wide.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.08.2021
Quelle: Hardware Zone EN→DE
The vibrant competition Vivo faces give us pause before recommending it as a top-of-mind purchase. Unfortunately, this choice dilemma results in the X60 Pro losing a little of its lustre, despite the phone being relatively well put together. Really, if you’re able to fork out close to S$1,200, there are so many other true flagships with other perks to consider, even before you look at this pretty phone. Even the S$999 non-Pro based Vivo X60 that loses the gimbal stabilisation feature is still a hard choice against the ASUS and Xiaomi options. So let's take a look at the Vivo X60 series' strong suit. At the $1,000 price point, Vivo's options excel in its attention to design, handling and extreme battery life. Also, if you're a Vivo fan and this is a logical upgrade for you, hop over to their official Shopee e-store to get one.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Gadgetguy EN→DE
The Vivo X60 Pro has upped the cameraphone game with the addition of ZEISS Vario-Tessar lenses, Gimbal stabilisation 2.0 and a cute rotating Biotar bokeh effect. It is also one of the best-looking smartphones we have seen. To give you an idea of how good its camera is, DXOMark gives the X60 Pro+ (has a periscope zoom in addition to the X60 Pro lenses) 128 – a score reserved for Apple iPhone 12 Pro/Max and just three points off the incredible OPPO Find X3 Pro camera. Yet this costs a mere $1099 against the best at >$1500. We will come to the camera later, but you need to know that there are no obvious or hidden downsides to saving $500 by purchasing this impressive device. The highlights are Qualcomm SD870, Gimbal camera and a 120Hz, HDR10+, Gorilla Glass 6, AMOLED screen that is a sheer delight in its almost 19.8:9 tall and thin format.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 94% Preis: 90% Leistung: 90% Gehäuse: 100%
Quelle: Hardware Zone EN→DE
The audio quality also did no favours to the Vivo phone. If anything, medium-to-heavy users of music and videos would likely consider another device based on this alone. That leaves us with its excellent form factor and amazing battery life. Its longevity may satisfy some folks, but buyers would also need to consider if they can say no to the ASUS ZenFone 8’s imaging quality, or the 1440p display on Xiaomi Mi 11, or perhaps the Samsung Galaxy S21’s robust ecosystem and UI polish. So let's take a look at the Vivo X60 series' strong suit. At the $1,000 price point, Vivo's options excel in its attention to design, handling and extreme battery life. Also, if you're a Vivo fan and this is a logical upgrade for you, hop over to their official Shopee e-store to get one.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
The X60 Pro is a confident flagship from Vivo that plays to its strengths: a beautiful, lightweight design and strong main camera. You won't get wireless charging, an IP rating, or the absolute top-tier chipset, but for many those will be smart sacrifices to make.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE
With a good-looking design, well-rounded camera array and slick user interface, the Vivo X60 Pro is a solid jack-of-all-trades Android phone. However, it launched at the same price as some higher-spec contemporaries, making it harder to recommend.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Pocket Lint EN→DE
The Vivo X60 Pro is no game of two halves, it's an outright winner. The design is largely on point, in particular that soft-touch rear finish, and while its cameras aren't as all-singing, all-dancing as the Zeiss badge on the camera unit might suggest, the main snapper is certainly capable enough. Even the software is largely like stock Google Android, with only minor bouts of foul play - like rare blank notification hiccups - showing its typically inconsistent competition, such as Xiaomi, how things can be done. What's particularly standout about the X60 Pro, however, is the gimbal camera system - delivering stabilisation for video capture that's unlike what any other phone company can muster. The smoothness is mightly impressive, making for a striking feature. Sure, the X60 Pro is a timely launch for Vivo, given Euro 2020, but this isn't a device that only sells itself through the company name being splashed around stadium ad boards, its one that sells itself on sheer ability. Back of the net!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.07.2021
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
Basic specs include a 6.56-inch 120 Hz AMOLED display, a 4200 mAh battery with fast 33W charging, and 256 GB storage with 12 GB RAM. Like the X60 Pro+ variant, the X60 Pro 5G (Exynos) is quad-camera device, with dual tele-lenses and an ultra-wide complementing the main camera. Sensor and lens specs differ between the two models, however. That, combined with the change in chipset and image processing pipeline, should make for an interesting comparison between the two devices.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.07.2021
Quelle: Good Gear Guide EN→DE
Extremely stylish, and with an excellent 48-megapixel rear camera, the Vivo X60 Pro is the kind of smartphone that you would want to accompany you on trips to scenic places to snap beautiful pictures. Its unique photography modes provide endless possibilities to snap new and interesting photos for your albums.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Stuff TV EN→DE
Instead of going after the current crop of megabucks flagships, the X60 Pro is well-placed to shake things up in the mid-tier. It's a great-looking handset with a gimbal-stabilised camera that really helps it stand out from similarly-priced rivals. Prospective buyers should ask themselves how much video they actually shoot on their smartphone, though. It's not so competitive in other areas, and offers little else that you won't find in alternatives like OnePlus, Xiaomi or even Samsung. Given those brands will all be more familiar to UK customers, it makes the X60 Pro that bit harder to recommend, despite being so well-rounded.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
The X60 Pro is a confident flagship from Vivo that plays to its strengths: a beautiful, lightweight design and strong main camera. You won't get wireless charging, an IP rating, or the absolute top-tier chipset, but for many those will be smart sacrifices to make.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
The X60 Pro is a confident flagship from Vivo that plays to its strengths: a beautiful, lightweight design and strong main camera. You won't get wireless charging, an IP rating, or the absolute top-tier chipset, but for many those will be smart sacrifices to make.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.05.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE
Priced at Rs 49,990 (12+256GB), the Vivo X60 Pro is a surprise package, at least for those who did not experience the X50 Pro. It has set the new benchmark for premium-midrange smartphones, considering the number of photography features and updates it offers. The X60 Pro is more than just a camera phone. It is an all-round smartphone with strengths across.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.05.2021
Quelle: Tech2.in.com EN→DE
The Vivo X60 Pro is a phone that I think will find a lot of takers, simply because it is priced right. Despite not being the flagship of the series, it manages to sacrifice precious little in the end. I think a value-conscious market like India will appreciate the balance this phone has managed to achieve. Vivo does, however, need to rethink FunTouch OS, starting with the name but more deeply with the inclusion of unescapable paid content and app pushes. Vivo: please start sparing the Pro and Pro+ versions of your phones from this. People have paid extra for a better device, charge them a little more so you don’t have to push this content onto them.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Vivo X60 Pro is a good successor to the Vivo X50 Pro, and improves in areas that the latter lacked in. Performance has gotten a good bump thanks to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SoC. Photo and video quality are also better than with the predecessor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
There are lingering question marks over its price and availability so I won't be scoring the Vivo X60 Pro yet, but as it stands this is a unique upper-mid-range/entry-flagship phone with a remarkably stable camera, a highly desirable design and solid performance. It isn't the best-specced phone in its class, however, and for all its camera charms it doesn’t take the best photos. As a value proposition, we suspect it’s going to struggle against the altogether more capable OnePlus 9. But for those looking for something a little different in a rather samey field, it’s a sleek and stylish alternative.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.04.2021
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
It's among the finest-built handsets that you can get, and the color version we reviewed has an understated beauty that we find very stylish. The AMOLED display is simply gorgeous, the chipset is predictably potent, and the cameras are excellent for most anything.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
And finally – the price. At RM3,299 – the Vivo X60 Pro does seem to be pricy at the time being. As it stands now, the Vivo X60 Pro doesn’t seem like a worthy upgrade over the X50 Pro from last year as I think that there is still a lot of room for improvement on the X60 Pro.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 07.04.2021
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
The Vivo X60 Pro is priced at Rs 49,990 making this a flagship level offering for 12GB RAM and 256GB storage space. The obvious competitor is the OnePlus 9, which now starts at Rs 49,999 for the 8GB/128GB variant and Rs 54,999 for the 12GB/256GB variant, but it runs the Snapdragon 888, which is the latest and more powerful processor. If you are looking to spend Rs 50,000 on a smartphone, the vivo X60 Pro is a worthy contender. The camera, performance and battery life are all excellent, and you are getting 256GB storage, which is an added advantage.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.04.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE
The Vivo X60 Pro is a flagship smartphone and it feels just that in every respect. A major downside is that it lacks assured protection from water and dust, so users will have to be extra careful with the phone. While there is no lag in performance, the camera is one area where we would like to dig deeper. We will reserve for now our verdict on the Vivo X60 Pro, as we explore this device further and write about it in our in-depth review.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.03.2021
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
The X60 Pro is a confident flagship from Vivo that plays to its strengths: a beautiful, lightweight design and strong main camera. You won't get wireless charging or the absolute top-tier chipset, but for many those will be smart sacrifices to make.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 26.03.2021
Quelle: Think Digit EN→DE
The Vivo X60 Pro is the coming of age for Vivo. This smartphone establishes that Vivo can make a smartphone with an incredible camera stack, as the Zeiss partnership has yielded very impressive results. The new Gimbal 20 stabilisation also works ridiculously well and the overall camera experience is so good that you'd want to take more photos and shoot more videos. Vivo hasn't skimped out on the hardware either, giving you a flagship Snapdragon 870 SoC, 12GB LPDDR4x memory and even 256GB of UFS3.1 storage.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 85% Leistung: 82% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: India Today EN→DE
The Vivo X60 Pro is the dark horse of 2021. Almost no one expected Vivo to come with such a powerful smartphone in India and the smartphone has surprised. OnePlus has made few sacrifices on the OnePlus 9 this year which may force few potential buyers to at least consider alternatives and the Vivo X60 Pro could just be that smartphone. Also, Vivo now has a chance to feed into some of OnePlus’ market share in the mid-premium category with the latter deciding to move towards the premium category.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Slashgear EN→DE
2021 started with a bit of uncertainty, especially for the smartphone market. Has the economy recovered enough to take big risks in new products? Or are consumers still opting to make “safe” purchases of familiar and tested products? The one thing that remains unchanged even with the pandemic is people’s needs for an accessible smartphone with top-notch cameras that can capture their memories in perfect detail and performance that goes beyond its price tag. That’s what Vivo is promising with the Vivo X60 Pro, one of its first to be made in collaboration with famed optics company ZEISS, and we take an intimate look to see if it all checks out.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE
The Vivo X60 Pro comes really close to being a perfect flagship. It has a great display, top-level performance and some great pair of cameras that help in elevating the experience to new heights. But compared to its main competitor - OnePlus 9R, the Vivo X60 Pro despite being a great device falls short on the pricing because of which it might fail to appeal to the audience.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.03.2021
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
Vivo has launched the X60 Pro at the same price as it had launched the X50 Pro. If you compare it to just that, you find that the company has offered improvements in terms of processor, internal storage, RAM and to some extent in terms of the camera also.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
I’ll save my full thoughts for the full review, but it is clear gimbal stabilisation makes a huge difference – though I can’t say I completely love it. Yes, the footage is very stable and this is good if you’re moving quickly. There is an almost faux-look to video and it takes a while to adjust. If your stabilisation seems off then there’s a handy tool to calibrate it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.03.2021
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
When I tested the Vivo X50 Pro, I was impressed with its gimbal camera stabilisation system. Now, I am curious to see what has improved. If you shoot a lot of videos and have the Vivo X60 Pro on your mind, then don't miss my full review, coming up soon.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.03.2021
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
There is no doubt in my mind that the Vivo X60 Pro has the best design in all the flagship devices I have tested so far this year. It feels extremely premium in the hand and at the same time, it’s been constructed with durability in mind. There is very little to complain about in the performance department apart from the unusual heating of the device during some heavy-ended graphics-based usage. The cameras are also exceptional, especially when you compare the low-light capabilities to some of the competing devices. Apart from that, the X60 Pro’s superlative display matches up to industry standards and packs in all the features that you could possibly want. Could the haptics have been better? Most definitely. The battery life is nothing to write home about and the lack of wireless charging or an official IP rating makes me question the price tag. FunTouch is in a state of improvement and still has some way to go.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Pokde EN→DE
All in all, the vivo X60 Pro was pretty fun to use and it feels premium. Despite that, some may argue that vivo is asking a lot for the device considering that it is priced at RM3,299. At that price, you’d definitely find other flagships that offer a higher-end Snapdragon 888 chip more attractive. Don’t get me wrong though as the Snapdragon 870 is still a powerful SoC, but I just feel that they should offer more for the price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.03.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 83% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 87%
Quelle: Engadget EN→DE
vivo and ZEISS believe they are ideal partners that go beyond simple unilateral pursuits; in fact, the brands reached a consensus through fruitful communications, series of virtual meetings and mutual site visits, hoping to achieve greatness in this new era. With that being said, vivo and ZEISS will collaborate on an ongoing basis and have established the “vivo ZEISS Imaging Lab” as a joint R&D team and facility. We’re expecting more exciting new developments and mobile photography breakthroughs to come!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.03.2021
Quelle: Igeekphone EN→DE Archive.org version
From the results, as the first finished product of Vivo and Zeiss, the performance of Vivo X60 Pro is also remarkable. In particular, the “Vivo Zeiss Joint Imaging System” is equipped to bring a rich and transparent imaging effect. Of course, this is just the beginning. With the continuous development of cooperation between the two parties, I believe that Vivo Zeiss will continue to promote mobile imaging technology to go further.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.12.2020
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 20.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Leistung: 95% Bildschirm: 88% Mobilität: 78% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Hipertextual ES→DE
Positive: Support 5G; elegant design; nice cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.07.2021
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE
Positive: Nice cameras; decent processor; beautiful design; great built quality; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.06.2021
Quelle: Smartphone Italia IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Ausstattung: 90% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Geek 4 You IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Chimera Revo IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79%
Quelle: Chimera Revo IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79%
Quelle: Notebook Italia IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Preis: 60% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 53% Ausstattung: 81%
Quelle: DDay IT IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 08.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 69% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 73% Gehäuse: 89%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Leistung: 90% Mobilität: 78% Gehäuse: 88%
Quelle: Batista70Phone IT→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; high performance; beautiful display; long battery life. Negative: Mono speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.09.2021
Quelle: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→DE
Positive: High performance; slim size; light weight; nice display; great cameras. Negative: No wireless charging; unsupported waterproof; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.07.2021
Quelle: Les Mobiles FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.12.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.09.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Meilleurmobile FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.08.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Journal du Geek FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Phonandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 26.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Fredzone FR→DE
Positive: Decent processor; nice performance; attractive price; support 5G. Negative: Mono speakers; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.07.2021
Quelle: Top for Phone FR→DE
Positive: Premium design; excellent display; high performance; support 5G. Negative: No wireless charging; mediocre speakers; short battery life; no mini jack; no microSD card slot; no LED notification.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.06.2021
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Positive: Attractive price; nice design; decent hardware; good performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.04.2021
Quelle: Galaktyczny PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Galaktyczny PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.11.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Komputerswiat PL→DE
Positive: Stylish design; nice display; big screen; high performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 08.07.2021
Quelle: Product Test RU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.07.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 94% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Zoom RU→DE
Positive: Attractive price; great cameras; powerful hardware; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.07.2021
Quelle: Hitech Vesti RU→DE
Positive: Slim size; light weight; nice design; metal case; great built quality; powerful hardware; beautiful display; excellent cameras; fast charging. Negative: No headphone jack; no stereo speakers; no microSD card slot.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.06.2021
Quelle: Mega Obzor RU→DE
Positive: Low price; nice cameras; excellent display; long battery life; quick charging; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.04.2021
Quelle: Smartmania.cz CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Leistung: 91% Ausstattung: 86% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 92%
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; powerful hardware; nice cameras; decent display. Negative: Short battery life; no wireless charging; mono speakers; unsupported waterproof.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.09.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; excellent cameras; beautiful display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.04.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Simple design; solid workmanship; nice cameras; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.04.2021
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; nice display; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2021
Quelle: Genk VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; powerful processor; good price; support 5G.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.04.2021
Quelle: Zing VN→DE
Positive: Impressive cameras; premium design; great built quality; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.03.2021
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Simple design; impressive cameras; decent hardware; nice gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2021
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; 12GB RAM; nice cameras; support 5G.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.03.2021
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Excellent cameras; powerful hardware; support 5G; premium design.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.03.2021
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; excellent cameras; quick charging; premium design; solid workmanship; big screen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.01.2021
Quelle: Arena IT →DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.06.2021
Bewertung: Gesamt: 92% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Ausstattung: 90% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 90%
Kommentar
Qualcomm Adreno 650: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SoC. Laut Qualcomm um 25% schneller als die alte Adreno 640 im Snapdragon 855.
Diese Klasse ist noch durchaus fähig neueste Spiele flüssig darzustellen, nur nicht mehr mit allen Details und in hohen Auflösungen. Besonders anspruchsvolle Spiele laufen nur in minimalen Detailstufen, wodurch die grafische Qualität oft deutlich leidet. Diese Klasse ist nur noch für Gelegenheitsspieler empfehlenswert. Der Stromverbrauch von modernen Grafikkarten in dieser Klasse ist dafür geringer und erlaubt auch bessere Akkulaufzeiten.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
SD 870: High-End SoC (System on a Chip) für Smartphones welcher Mitte 2021 vorgestellt wurde. Integriert unter anderen einen schnellen "Prime Core" mit bis zu 3,2 GHz und drei weitere schnelle Cortex-A77 basierende Performance-Kerne. Zum Stromsparen wurden außerdem 4 weitere ARM Cortex-A55 Kerne verbaut.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
6.56": Es handelt sich um ein kleines Display-Format für Smartphones. Man sollte nicht stark fehlsichtig sein und man wird wenig Details am Bildschirm sehen und nur eine kleine Auflösung zur Verfügung haben. Dafür sollte das Gerät klein und handlich sein, gut transportierbar.» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.
0.177 kg:
In diese Gewichtsklasse fallen die meisten Smartphones und nur vereinzelt Tablets. Nur wenige Smartphones sind schwerer und eher als Tablets anzusehen.
Vivo:
Vivo Mobile Communications Co., Ltd. ist ein 2009 gegründeter chinesischer Elektronikhersteller, der hauptsächlich Smartphones und Software produziert. Es ist ein Tochterunternehmen von BBK Electronic Corporation, einem riesigen chinesischen Elektronikkonzern, zu dem auch Oppo, Oneplus und Realme gehören, wodurch ein beachtlicher gemeinsamer Weltmarkt-Anteil bei Smartphones zustandekommt. Vivo bietet Smartphones, Smartphone-Zubehör, Software und Online-Dienste.
81.64%: Diese Bewertung ist leicht überdurchschnittlich, es gibt etwas mehr Geräte mit schlechteren Beurteilungen. Klare Kaufempfehlungen sehen aber anders aus.
» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.