Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) vs Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel UHD Graphics 605 ► remove from comparison
Die Intel UHD Graphics 605 ist eine Prozessorgrafikkarte der Ende 2017 vorgestellten Gemini-Lake-Generation (z.B. Pentium Silver N5000). Zwar glänzt die GPU mit einer sehr niedrigen Leistungsaufnahme, allerdings siedelt sich die Performance nur im Low-End-Segment an und ist für neuere Spiele nicht ausreichend. Als maximale Ausbaustufe der Gemini-Lake-GPU verfügt die UHD Graphics 605 über 18 Execution Units (EUs), die mit bis zu 750 MHz takten. Technisch basiert die GPU auf der Intel-Gen9-Architektur, die auch bei der teureren Skylake-Serie zum Einsatz kommt. Im Vergleich zur alten Intel HD Graphics 505 in Apollo Lake , wurden nur die Displayausgänge verbessert (Gen. 10). Performance und Architektur blieben unangetastet.
Mangels eigenem Grafikspeicher oder eDRAM-Cache greift die UHD Graphics 605 über das Interface des Prozessors auf den System-RAM zu (2x 64 Bit DDR3L/LPDDR4-2400).
Performance
Die theoretische Grafikleistung entspricht in etwa der älteren Core-M-Grafikeinheit HD Graphics 5300 . Dadurch sind nur wenige anspruchslose Spiele flüssig spielbar (siehe auch die Spielebenchmarks der Intel HD Graphics 505 ). In unseren Tests erreichte z.B. nur wenige Spiele wie Dirt Rally oder Sims 4 spielbare Frameraten in niedrigsten Detailstufe.
Features
Der überarbeitete Videodecoder decodiert und encodiert H.265-/HEVC-Videos (8b und 10b) sowie VP9 vollständig in Hardware und arbeitet dadurch deutlich effizienter als bislang. Bei der Bildausgabe unterstützt der SoC dank Gen.10 nun auch HDMI 2.0a mit HDCP 2.2 un DisplayPort 1.2a nativ.
Leistungsaufnahme
Die TDP des gesamten Chips liegt beim Pentium N5000 standardmäßig bei 6 Watt, sodass die GPU vor allem in (oftmals passiv gekühlten) Netbooks oder schlanken Notebooks zu finden ist. Optional kann die TDP auch auf 4,8 Watt abgesenkt werden, wodurch allerdings die Performance sinkt.
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) ► remove from comparison
Die Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) ist eine in den Tablet-SoCs der Cherry-Trail-Serie (z.B. Atom x7-Z8700 ) integrierte Grafikeinheit. Sie basiert auf der gleichen Architektur wie die GPU verschiedener Broadwell-Prozessoren (z.B. HD Graphics 5300 ), bietet allerdings deutlich weniger Shadereinheiten und geringere Taktraten. Die genauen Spezifikationen hängen vom jeweiligen SoC ab:
Die schnellste Variante mit 16 EUs und maximal 600 MHz schlägt die ältere HD Graphics (Bay Trail) um Faktor zwei, womit sich die GPU etwas oberhalb einer Qualcomm Adreno 330 oder PowerVR G6430 , jedoch deutlich unter einer Adreno 420 oder GX6450 einordnet. Auch Nvidias Tegra-SoCs K1 und X1 rechnen weitaus schneller.
Unter Windows werden sich Anwender deshalb weiter auf sehr alte und anspruchslose Spiele beschränken müssen, wohingegen moderne Android-Games auch in hohen Auflösungen zumeist flüssig dargestellt werden sollten. Der x7-Z8700 war z.B. nur knapp in der Lage Team Fortress 2 in minimalen Details und 1280x720 flüssig wiederzugeben (11 - 69 fps).
Videos kann die GPU auch in 4K/H.265 flüssig wiedergeben (je nach Bitrate und Farbtiefe).
Die Intel HD Graphics Grafikkarte in den Cherry Trail SoCs unterstützt nach unseren Tests mit dem MS Surface 3 mit Atom x7-Z8700 nur DisplayPort 1.1 und damit lediglich 30 Hz bei 4K (3.840 x 2.160).
Intel HD Graphics 500 ► remove from comparison
Die Intel HD Graphics 500 ist eine Prozessorgrafikkarte der Mitte 2016 vorgestellten Apollo-Lake-Generation (z.B. Celeron N3450 und Celeron N3350 ). Zwar glänzt die GPU mit einer sehr niedrigen Leistungsaufnahme, allerdings siedelt sich die Performance nur im untersten Low-End-Segment an und ist für neuere Spiele zumeist nicht ausreichend. Als teildeaktivierte Variante der Apollo-Lake-GPU verfügt die HD Graphics 500 nur über 12 Execution Units (HD Graphics 505: 18 EUs), die je nach Modell mit bis zu 650 oder 700 MHz takten. Technisch basiert die GPU auf der Intel-Gen9-Architektur, die auch bei der teureren Skylake-Serie zum Einsatz kommt.
Mangels eigenem Grafikspeicher oder eDRAM-Cache greift die HD Graphics 500 über das Interface des Prozessors auf den System-RAM zu (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-/LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400).
Performance
Die HD Graphics 500 dürfte sich noch knapp unterhalb der älteren Broadwell-Grafikeinheit HD Graphics (Broadwell) ansiedeln, sodass aktuelle Spiele (Stand 2016) nur in den seltensten Fällen und in sehr niedrigen Einstellungen flüssig dargestellt werden.
Features
Der überarbeitete Videodecoder decodiert nun auch H.265-/HEVC-Videos vollständig in Hardware und arbeitet dadurch deutlich effizienter als bislang. Die Bildausgabe auf bis zu drei Displays erfolgt über DP/eDP oder HDMI (4K vermutlich nur bei 30 Hz via HDMI 1.4).
Leistungsaufnahme
Die TDP des gesamten SoCs liegt bei standardmäßig bei 6 Watt, sodass die GPU vor allem in (oftmals passiv gekühlten) Netbooks oder schlanken Notebooks zu finden ist. Optional kann die TDP auch auf 4 Watt abgesenkt werden, wodurch allerdings die Performance sinkt.
Intel UHD Graphics 605 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) Intel HD Graphics 500 Gen. 9 Serie Codename Gemini Lake Cherry Trail Apollo Lake Architektur Gen. 9 Apollo Lake Gen. 8 Gen. 9 Apollo Lake Pipelines 18 - unified 16 - unified 12 - unified Kerntakt 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz 200 - 600 (Boost) MHz 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz Speicherbandbreite 64/128 Bit 64/128 Bit 64/128 Bit Speichertyp DDR4 / LPDDR4 Shared Memory ja ja ja API DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4 DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4 Herstellungsprozess 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm Features QuickSync QuickSync Erscheinungsdatum 11.12.2017 02.03.2015 01.09.2016 Herstellerseite ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - UHD Graphics 605
0.2 pt (1%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
0.1 pt (0%)
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 500
0.2 pt (0%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
129 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
113 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 32770 avg: 43574 median: 45008 (5%) max: 55453 Points
min: 18563 avg: 20873 median: 19303 (2%) max: 27537 Points
min: 19294 avg: 24491 median: 24609 (2%) max: 29579 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 13350 avg: 16118 median: 16553.5 (2%) max: 18016 Points
min: 12299 avg: 15195 median: 15085 (2%) max: 18200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 2670 avg: 3247 median: 3154 (3%) max: 4294 Points
min: 769 avg: 1454 median: 1488 (2%) max: 1905 Points
min: 1932 avg: 2140 median: 2116 (2%) max: 2306 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 2874 avg: 3518 median: 3359.5 (1%) max: 4485 Points
min: 1537 avg: 1851 median: 1783.5 (0%) max: 2272 Points
min: 2578 avg: 3030 median: 3007 (1%) max: 3693 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 376 avg: 450.1 median: 419 (1%) max: 620 Points
min: 174 avg: 390.4 median: 248 (0%) max: 1059 Points
min: 271 avg: 321.5 median: 307 (1%) max: 401 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 411 avg: 473.4 median: 454 (1%) max: 576 Points
min: 193 avg: 233 median: 225 (0%) max: 281 Points
min: 293 avg: 355.9 median: 362.5 (0%) max: 444 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 20859 avg: 25930 median: 26031 (3%) max: 30797 Points
min: 7544 avg: 16078 median: 17063.5 (2%) max: 23395 Points
min: 20140 avg: 26074 median: 23761 (3%) max: 34320 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
2870 Points (12%)
min: 1445 avg: 1525 median: 1525 (7%) max: 1605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
2805 Points (6%)
min: 1598 avg: 1684 median: 1684 (4%) max: 1770 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
1628 Points (8%)
min: 1072 avg: 1215 median: 1159 (6%) max: 1414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
1450 Points (4%)
min: 1058 avg: 1251 median: 1142 (3%) max: 1554 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
2642 Points (23%)
min: 1353 avg: 1429 median: 1398 (12%) max: 1593 Points
2013 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
2628 Points (16%)
min: 1300 avg: 1505 median: 1530 (9%) max: 1732 Points
2516 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
1789 Points (9%)
min: 1037 avg: 1133 median: 1070 (5%) max: 1319 Points
2208 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
1636 Points (5%)
min: 973 avg: 1102 median: 1054 (4%) max: 1261 Points
2731 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
882 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
281 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 1614 avg: 1751 median: 1619 (2%) max: 2019 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 1849 avg: 2059 median: 1893 (1%) max: 2434 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 655 avg: 795 median: 748 (1%) max: 1009 Points
min: 314 avg: 359.4 median: 343 (0%) max: 562 Points
min: 414 avg: 533 median: 530 (1%) max: 655 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 588 avg: 701 median: 648 (1%) max: 902 Points
min: 278 avg: 319.9 median: 298 (0%) max: 494 Points
min: 368 avg: 478.6 median: 482 (0%) max: 584 Points
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel UHD Graphics 605 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
2162 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel UHD Graphics 605 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
1785 Points (1%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
8388 Points (4%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
5802 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics 605
min: 2882 avg: 4208 median: 4171 (5%) max: 5570 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min: 2403 avg: 2833 median: 2595 (3%) max: 3330 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 500
min: 3393 avg: 3551 median: 3506 (5%) max: 3753 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
2877 Points (4%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
1.7 fps (1%)
1.2 fps (0%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
6.5 fps (2%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
7.2 fps (3%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
9 fps (2%)
5.7 fps (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel UHD Graphics 605 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3505 avg: 3812 median: 3773 (3%) max: 4366 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min: 1192 avg: 2009 median: 1973 (1%) max: 2551 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 500
min: 2791 avg: 2888 median: 2894 (2%) max: 3031 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 15.24 avg: 17.9 median: 17.9 (6%) max: 20.5 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min: 4.01 avg: 8.8 median: 8.4 (3%) max: 11.71 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
min: 7.05 avg: 8.2 median: 8.1 (3%) max: 9.61 fps
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.37 avg: 18.2 median: 18.1 (1%) max: 25.6 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min: 6.64 avg: 10.3 median: 9.7 (1%) max: 15.52 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
min: 10.15 avg: 12.9 median: 13 (1%) max: 15.74 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min: 98 avg: 98 median: 98 (98%) max: 98.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
min: 97.7 avg: 97.8 median: 97.8 (98%) max: 98 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.9 avg: 6.4 median: 6.4 (1%) max: 6.8 fps
3.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 9.9 avg: 12.8 median: 12.8 (1%) max: 15.7 fps
9.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 7.1 avg: 11 median: 11.3 (1%) max: 14.6 fps
min: 6.3 avg: 7.3 median: 7 (1%) max: 9 fps
8.4 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 13 avg: 17.6 median: 16.5 (0%) max: 23.3 fps
min: 9.2 avg: 10.8 median: 11 (0%) max: 13 fps
15 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 16 avg: 23.8 median: 22.1 (1%) max: 33.4 fps
min: 8.4 avg: 13.8 median: 13.5 (1%) max: 18 fps
20 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel UHD Graphics 605 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 32 avg: 43.1 median: 45.5 (0%) max: 51.9 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) min: 22 avg: 30.5 median: 32 (0%) max: 38.5 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 500 42 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
23.3 fps (0%)
16.3 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
2 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 67 avg: 93.5 median: 93.5 (0%) max: 120 Samples/s
min: 48 avg: 58.7 median: 59 (0%) max: 69 Samples/s
49 Samples/s (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 96 avg: 142 median: 142 (0%) max: 188 Samples/s
min: 69 avg: 87.7 median: 89 (0%) max: 105 Samples/s
79 Samples/s (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 432 avg: 490.5 median: 490.5 (1%) max: 549 Points
277 Points (0%)
min: 296 avg: 320 median: 324 (0%) max: 336 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.3 avg: 11 median: 11 (2%) max: 11.6 Watt
8.9 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
11.8 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.1 fps per Watt (9%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
515 MHz (20%)
450 MHz (18%)
Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics 605 → 100% n=24 Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) → 58% n=24 Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 500 → 82% n=24
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
31.1 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
26 fps, max:
58 fps
fps
77%
HD Graphics 500:
23.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
7 8.2 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
6 fps, max:
11 fps
~ 8 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
49.8 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
41 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
57%
HD Graphics 500:
28.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
39 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
24 fps, max:
50 fps
fps
52%
HD Graphics 500:
20.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
26.6 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
18 fps, max:
34 fps
fps
52%
HD Graphics 500:
13.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
24.9 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
17 fps, max:
32 fps
fps
51%
HD Graphics 500:
12.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
23.6 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
11 fps, max:
33 fps
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
15 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
8 fps, max:
22 fps
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
6.5 10.9 ~ 9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.8 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.7 (!) [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
Problem during benchmarking occured: too slowmin:
9 fps, max:
15 fps
17.6 ~ 15 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
7.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
4 fps
50%
HD Graphics 500:
2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
4 fps
75%
HD Graphics 500:
3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
8.5 fps
0%
HD Graphics 500:
0 (!) [X] Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
Problem during benchmarking occured: Spiel startete nicht fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
4.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
8.8 fps
63%
HD Graphics 500:
5.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3 fps
33%
HD Graphics 500:
1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
53 fps
65%
HD Graphics 500:
34.4 (!) [X] Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
Problem during benchmarking occured: error at the endmax:
93 fps
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
8.9 fps
52%
HD Graphics 500:
4.6 (!) [X] Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
Problem during benchmarking occured: error at the endmax:
9 fps
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5 6.4 7.2 8.6 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
9.1 ~ 7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.5 5.9 6 6.1 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
~ 5 fps
80%
HD Graphics 500:
3.9 4.7 ~ 4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.1 5.3 5.5 5.5 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
~ 5 fps
80%
HD Graphics 500:
3.6 4.3 ~ 4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.4 4.2 4.4 5.2 7.5 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN 1.3
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
~ 5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.3 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN 1.3
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
7 fps
143%
HD Graphics 500:
10 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
13 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
38 41.4 ~ 40 fps
54%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
21.4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
34.5 36.5 ~ 36 fps
48%
HD Graphics 500:
17.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
17 18.4 ~ 18 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
18.8 fps
53%
HD Graphics 500:
10 fps
60%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
15.5 fps
70%
HD Graphics 500:
18.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.9 10 ~ 10 fps
62%
HD Graphics 500:
6.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5 fps
89%
HD Graphics 500:
4.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9 fps
97%
HD Graphics 500:
8.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
7.9 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
22.6 [X] Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300 1.4GHz
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min:
21 fps, max:
27 fps
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.4 fps
139%
HD Graphics 500:
15.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
8.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
4.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
6.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.3 fps
93%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
11.5 fps
126%
HD Graphics 500:
15.5 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
7 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
8.8 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
4.8 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
8.1 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
3.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
22.7 24.7 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
11 fps, max:
35 fps
~ 24 fps
63%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
13.9 [X] Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300 1.4GHz
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min:
7 fps, max:
19 fps
16.8 ~ 15 fps
80%
HD Graphics 500:
19.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.6 fps
70%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
15.1 fps
76%
HD Graphics 500:
16.4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
15.8 fps
62%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
9.8 fps
61%
HD Graphics 500:
9.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
32.5 33.7 35 35.9 36.5 49.5 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
42.8 fps, max:
-1 fps
~ 37 fps
54%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
20 [X] Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300 1.4GHz
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min:
18 fps
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.5 14 14.3 14.3 15.1 18.6 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
13.1 fps, max:
-1 fps
~ 15 fps
101%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
15.2 [X] Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300 1.4GHz
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min:
13 fps
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.9 6.7 7.4 7.8 10.6 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
8.7 fps, max:
-1 fps
~ 8 fps
90%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
7.2 [X] Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300 1.4GHz
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min:
6 fps
fps
70%
HD Graphics 500:
5.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.9 6.7 10 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
8.2 fps, max:
-1 fps
~ 8 fps
64%
HD Graphics 500:
5.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
1.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
42 fps
48%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
20.1 fps
68%
HD Graphics 500:
28.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
100%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
12.5 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5 11.6 11.7 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
0.501 fps, P1:
5.85 fps, max:
33.2 fps
~ 11 fps
98%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
10.8 (!) [X] Microsoft Surface 3 Intel Atom x7-Z8700 1.6GHz
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
Problem during benchmarking occured: Schwere grafische Probleme fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.3 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
0.3784 fps, P1:
4.59 fps, max:
34.4 fps
fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
10.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
7.8 fps
122%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
9.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
6.2 fps
92%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
5.7 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
16.2 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
6.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
31 fps
52%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
16 fps
71%
HD Graphics 500:
22 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
20 fps
60%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
12 fps
80%
HD Graphics 500:
16 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
13 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
13.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.4 fps
123%
HD Graphics 500:
17.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.3 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
15.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
96.9 fps
74%
HD Graphics 500:
71.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.8 fps
63%
HD Graphics 500:
13.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
10.5 fps
76%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
5.5 10 ~ 8 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.3 fps
70%
HD Graphics 500:
10 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5 fps
66%
HD Graphics 500:
6.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
58.5 fps
43%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
22 27.3 ~ 25 fps
75%
HD Graphics 500:
43.8 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
16.5 fps
79%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
12.5 13.5 ~ 13 fps
116%
HD Graphics 500:
19.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
13.3 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
58 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
47 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
29.7 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
16.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
34.7 fps
69%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
24 fps
84%
HD Graphics 500:
29.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.1 fps
79%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
13.5 fps
84%
HD Graphics 500:
14.4 fps
50%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
2.4 2.6 ~ 2 fps
68%
HD Graphics 500:
2.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
31.6 fps
68%
HD Graphics 500:
21.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
18.5 fps
50%
HD Graphics 500:
9.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
64%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
7 8.3 9 ~ 8 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
3.7 3.8 ~ 4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
32.3 fps
60%
HD Graphics 500:
19.3 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.1 fps
53%
HD Graphics 500:
9.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.1 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
34 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
15.2 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
11.6 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
0 (!) [X] Microsoft Surface 3 Intel Atom x7-Z8700 1.6GHz
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
Problem during benchmarking occured: Spiel startete nicht fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
0 (!) [X] Microsoft Surface 3 Intel Atom x7-Z8700 1.6GHz
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
Problem during benchmarking occured: Spiel startete nicht fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
44.4 48.4 ~ 46 fps
33%
HD Graphics 500:
14 16.6 ~ 15 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
26.4 27.5 ~ 27 fps
52%
HD Graphics 500:
14 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
16.4 17.1 ~ 17 fps
119%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
20.3 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
11.4 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
28.8 fps
97%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
24.3 [X] Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300 1.4GHz
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min:
20 fps, max:
29 fps
31.9 ~ 28 fps
59%
HD Graphics 500:
12.7 22 ~ 17 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.1 fps
85%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
16 [X] Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300 1.4GHz
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min:
13 fps, max:
19 fps
19 ~ 18 fps
64%
HD Graphics 500:
13.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
18.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
35 fps
79%
HD Graphics 500:
27.8 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
18 fps
68%
HD Graphics 500:
12.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.4 fps
70%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
8 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
19.9 fps
85%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
15.5 18.9 ~ 17 fps
56%
HD Graphics 500:
11.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.3 fps
65%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
7.2 8.5 ~ 8 fps
62%
HD Graphics 500:
7.6 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
7.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
27.4 fps
93%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
25.6 fps
84%
HD Graphics 500:
22.9 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.2 fps
57%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
12 fps
52%
HD Graphics 500:
11.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
6.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
55.6 fps
51%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
28.1 fps
72%
HD Graphics 500:
40.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
22.7 fps
55%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
12.5 fps
65%
HD Graphics 500:
14.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
15.2 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
18.7 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
78.7 fps
81%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
63.2 64 ~ 64 fps
69%
HD Graphics 500:
54.5 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.4 fps
103%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
18 18.8 ~ 18 fps
81%
HD Graphics 500:
14.1 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
10 fps
140%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
14 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.9 fps
179%
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
7 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
44 50.9 [X] Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300 1.4GHz
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min:
40 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 47 fps
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
18.3 [X] Chuwi Hi12 Intel Atom x5-Z8300 1.4GHz
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
min:
13 fps, max:
29 fps
fps
Average Gaming Intel UHD Graphics 605 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) → 78% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 81%
Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 500 → 71% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 70%
v1.28
log 01. 11:37:18
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 8270 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 6197 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 7543 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730457438s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Nov 2024 05:17:25 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.006s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8270 +0.002s ... 0.008s
#10 got single benchmarks 8270 +0.002s ... 0.01s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 6197 +0.001s ... 0.011s
#12 got single benchmarks 6197 +0.003s ... 0.014s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 7543 +0.001s ... 0.015s
#14 got single benchmarks 7543 +0.004s ... 0.019s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.049s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.049s
#18 Got 426 rows for game benchmarks. +0.031s ... 0.08s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.08s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.083s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.021s ... 0.104s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.104s
#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.105s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)