Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Duo U2500 vs Intel Core Duo T2400

Intel Core Duo U2500

Intel Core Duo T2400

show full text
ModelIntel Core Duo U2500Intel Core Duo T2400
CodenameYonahYonah
SeriesIntel Core DuoIntel Core Duo
Serie: Core Duo Yonah
Intel Core Duo T2700 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2600 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2500 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2450 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L2500 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2350 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2250 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L2400 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L2300 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2050 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U2500 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U2400 compare1.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2700 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2600 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2500 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2450 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2400 « 1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L2500 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2350 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2250 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L2400 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L2300 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2050 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U25001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U2400 compare1.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1200 MHz1830 MHz
FSB533667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP9 Watt31 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 U2500 +
1074 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 U2500 +
2021 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
922 Points (2%)
1488 Points (3%)
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T2400 +
193 Points (74%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
49 s (11%)
32 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
120 s (5%)
min: 77     avg: 81.7     median: 82 (4%)     max: 86 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2628 s (12%)
min: 1834     avg: 1856     median: 1861 (8%)     max: 1867 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
8178 MIPS (4%)
12390 MIPS (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
6009 MFLOPS (5%)
9150 MFLOPS (7%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T2400 +
min: 4543     avg: 5011     median: 4800 (65%)     max: 5657 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 1962     avg: 1985     median: 1985 (4%)     max: 2008 Points
min: 2726     avg: 3285     median: 2918 (6%)     max: 4381 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Duo U2500 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Duo T2400 → 150% n=7

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 18. 19:36:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 349 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 173 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734546976s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 16 Dec 2024 05:18:38 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 349 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#8 got single benchmarks 349 +0.004s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 173 +0s ... 0.005s

#10 got single benchmarks 173 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.008s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.014s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.017s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)