Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Duo U2500 vs Intel Core Duo T2400 vs Intel Core Duo L2300

Intel Core Duo U2500

► remove from comparison

Intel Core Duo T2400

► remove from comparison

Intel Core Duo L2300

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelIntel Core Duo U2500Intel Core Duo T2400Intel Core Duo L2300
SeriesIntel Core DuoIntel Core DuoIntel Core Duo
CodenameYonahYonahYonah
Serie: Core Duo Yonah
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T22501.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L23001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U2500 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2400 « 1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T22501.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L23001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U25001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T22501.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L2300 « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U25001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1200 MHz1830 MHz1500 MHz
FSB533667667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP9 Watt31 Watt15 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 U2500 +
1074 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 U2500 +
2021 Points (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 L2300 +
1727 s (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 L2300 +
54.7 s (11%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 U2500 +
922 Points (2%)
161%
1 T2400 +
1488 Points (3%)
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T2400 +
193 Points (74%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
49 s (11%)
32 s (7%)
39.4 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 U2500 +
120 s (5%)
146%
1 T2400 +
min: 77     avg: 81.7     median: 82 (4%)     max: 86 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2628 s (12%)
min: 1834     avg: 1856     median: 1861 (8%)     max: 1867 s
2181 s (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 U2500 +
8178 MIPS (4%)
152%
1 T2400 +
12390 MIPS (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 U2500 +
6009 MFLOPS (5%)
152%
1 T2400 +
9150 MFLOPS (7%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T2400 +
min: 4543     avg: 5011     median: 4800 (65%)     max: 5657 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 U2500 +
min: 1962     avg: 1985     median: 1985 (4%)     max: 2008 Points
147%
1 T2400 +
min: 2726     avg: 3285     median: 2918 (6%)     max: 4381 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Duo U2500 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Duo T2400 → 147% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Duo L2300 → 122% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 15. 05:32:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 349 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 173 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 250 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731645175s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 349 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#9 got single benchmarks 349 +0.004s ... 0.006s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 173 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#11 got single benchmarks 173 +0.013s ... 0.019s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 250 +0.001s ... 0.02s

#13 got single benchmarks 250 +0.003s ... 0.023s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.032s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.032s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)