Notebookcheck Logo

Unisoc T7255 vs UNISOC Tangula T700

Unisoc T7255

► remove from comparison UNISOC T7255

Der Unisoc T7255 (ehemals Unisoc T616) ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei großen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 2 GHz Taktrate und 6 kleinen Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Dual-Core-ISP (24, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x-1.866. Die integrierte ARM Mali G57 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt.

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison UNISOC Tangula T700

Der Unisoc Tangula T700 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1.8 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. er bietet ähnliche Spezifikationen wie der Unisoc Tiger T618 bzw T610.

Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Zudem ist die Nutzung von 90-Hz-Bildschirmen möglich. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

show full text
ModelUnisoc T7255UNISOC Tangula T700
SeriesUNISOC UNISOC
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7255 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7225 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7200 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72551.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7225 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7200 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 « 1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1800 - 1800 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP1 (750 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
0.5 pt (37%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -66%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 -3%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 -3%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 -3%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4725 -2%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 -1%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 -1%
UNISOC T618
0.475 -1%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 0%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 0%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
0.4915 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
0.516 7%
Mediatek Helio P70
0.517 8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
0.53 10%
Mediatek Helio P90
0.546 14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
0.552 15%
Mediatek Helio G90T
0.571 19%
MediaTek Dimensity 720
0.575 20%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 170%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2798     avg: 2956     median: 2990 (35%)     max: 3036 Points
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (34%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2798     avg: 2954     median: 3002 (34%)     max: 3063 Points
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (33%)     max: 2961 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 427     avg: 433.5     median: 433.5 (11%)     max: 440 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 1474     avg: 1556     median: 1572 (6%)     max: 1606 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 298     avg: 350.9     median: 360 (14%)     max: 380 Points
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (14%)     max: 356 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1184     avg: 1410     median: 1464 (3%)     max: 1502 Points
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (2%)     max: 1393 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 1663     avg: 1734     median: 1734 (17%)     max: 1805 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 5131     avg: 5378     median: 5377.5 (5%)     max: 5624 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T7255 +
5574 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T7255 +
1737 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2530.7     avg: 2711     median: 2650.4 (3%)     max: 3013.8 ms
3722 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 12141     avg: 14092     median: 14522 (12%)     max: 15304 Points
10382 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 45     avg: 55     median: 57.5 (16%)     max: 60 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 68     avg: 78     median: 80 (15%)     max: 86 Points
65 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
200006 Points (19%)
186885 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
67597 Points (24%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 228124     avg: 230591     median: 229582 (14%)     max: 235075 Points
164867 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 67445     avg: 69296     median: 69214 (19%)     max: 71312 Points
65438 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 3040     avg: 3123     median: 3122.5 (0%)     max: 3205 Points
2078 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 52.5     avg: 53.7     median: 53.7 (39%)     max: 54.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 192.9     avg: 197     median: 197 (6%)     max: 201 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 17.7     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (23%)     max: 20.4 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 199.3     avg: 213.7     median: 213.7 (6%)     max: 228 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 11341     avg: 17154     median: 13300 (21%)     max: 24988 Points
10033 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 7936     avg: 8004     median: 8011 (33%)     max: 8066 Points
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (36%)     max: 8746 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5412 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
12328 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
8438 Points (55%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 382     avg: 388     median: 388 (15%)     max: 394 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 3.47     avg: 5.9     median: 5.8 (3%)     max: 8.44 Watt
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (2%)     max: 8.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 0.91     avg: 1.2     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 1.398 Watt

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T7255 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 86% n=13

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 19. 23:16:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14016 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732054568s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.019s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14016 +0s ... 0.019s

#8 got single benchmarks 14016 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#10 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.004s ... 0.031s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.046s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.049s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)