Notebookcheck Logo

Unisoc T7225 vs Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz

Unisoc T7225

► remove from comparison UNISOC T7225

Das Unisoc T7225 (ehemals Unisoc T612) ist ein SoC der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz Taktrate und 6 stromsparenden Cortex-A55-Kernen, ebenfalls mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. 

Das T7225 kommt mit einem LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 933 MHz und LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz.

Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kern, 16 Shading Units und 614 MHz Taktung. Hier liegt auch der einzige Unterschied zum Unisoc Tiger T610: Die Grafikkarte besitzt beim T7225 einen Kern weniger.

Das Unisoc Tiger T7225 wird bei TSMC im 12nm-FinFet-Prozess hergestellt.

Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz

► remove from comparison  RK3066

Der Rockchip RK3066 ist ein günstiger SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er bietet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 CPU Kerne mit NEON Erweiterungen, eine ARM Mali 400MP4 (Quad-Core mit 250 MHz getaktet) Grafikkarte und einen Video De- und Encoder. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt maximal 2 GB DDR1-3.

Weitere Features lt Wikipedia

  • VPU (Video Processing Unit) Multi-Media Processor supporting 1080p image and video decoding
  • HDMI 1.4 Interface
  • 2-channels TFT LCD Interface with 5 layers and 3D Display (1920×1080 Maximum Display Size)
  • USB 2.0 Interface
  • SD/MMC Interface

ModelUnisoc T7225Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz
SeriesUNISOC
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55
Serie:
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7225 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7200 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Google Tensor G4 compare1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1500 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 82 / 2
Technology12 nm40 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPMali-400 MP4, Single Channel DDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP1 (614 MHz)ARM Mali-400 MP4 (250 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.unisoc.comwww.rock-chips.com
L2 Cache512 KB

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 RK3066 +
min: 4687     avg: 4990     median: 5059 (4%)     max: 5161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 RK3066 +
4890 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 2909     avg: 2944     median: 2939 (35%)     max: 2990 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 2933     avg: 2938     median: 2937.5 (34%)     max: 2942 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 344     avg: 346     median: 346 (14%)     max: 347 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 1311     avg: 1340     median: 1323 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T7225 +
5404 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T7225 +
1598 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 T7225 +
2973 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3066 +
1959 ms (21%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 T7225 +
12581 Points (10%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T7225 +
46 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T7225 +
73 Points (13%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 RK3066 +
min: 3105     avg: 3862     median: 3974 (9%)     max: 4257 points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T7225 +
196368 Points (12%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T7225 +
68374 Points (19%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
2969 Points (0%)
5852 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 11681     avg: 13404     median: 13404 (21%)     max: 15127 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 6566     avg: 7419     median: 7610 (32%)     max: 7776 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T7225 +
365 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 3.37     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 6.99 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 1.121     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.68 Watt

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T7225 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz → 197% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 16. 20:26:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14386 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3576 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731785193s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.057s ... 0.057s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.057s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14386 +0.001s ... 0.058s

#8 got single benchmarks 14386 +0.008s ... 0.066s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3576 +0.001s ... 0.067s

#10 got single benchmarks 3576 +0.009s ... 0.075s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.075s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.09s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.092s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)