Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 vs Intel Core 2 Duo U7500

Intel Core 2 Duo T5450

► remove from comparison

OEM Prozessor

1.0375 - 1.3 V

MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64 (Intel's x86-64 implementation), XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), LaGrande Technology (Intel Trusted Execution Technology) Virtualization Technology

Die size: 111 mm²

Steppings: L2, M0

Intel Core 2 Duo T5470

► remove from comparison

65nm

Intel Core 2 Duo U7500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 ist ein Stromspar-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks aus 2006. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern und punktet mit 64-Bit Unterstütztung und einem TDP von lediglich 10 Watt. Mit einer maximalen Taktrate von 1.1 GHz ist er die langsamste Variante der Core 2 Duo U7000 Serie.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5450Intel Core 2 Duo T5470Intel Core 2 Duo U7500
CodenameMerom-2048Merom-2048Merom-2048
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom-2048
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 « 1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 « 1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 « 1.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1660 MHz1600 MHz1060 MHz
FSB667800533
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt35 Watt10 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
SocketPBGA479
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Intel Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5450 +
min: 1015     avg: 1504     median: 1666 (10%)     max: 1669 Points
67%
1 U7500 +
1116 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5450 +
min: 1919     avg: 2827     median: 3121.5 (2%)     max: 3144 Points
63%
1 U7500 +
1976 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1344     avg: 1381     median: 1367 (3%)     max: 1433 Points
min: 1353     avg: 1365     median: 1364.5 (3%)     max: 1376 Points
875 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5450 +
min: 33.62     avg: 33.8     median: 33.9 (7%)     max: 34 s
106%
1 T5470 +
32 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5450 +
15268 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5450 +
10407 MFLOPS (8%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3322     avg: 3505     median: 3501 (7%)     max: 3813 Points
min: 3508     avg: 3713     median: 3713 (8%)     max: 3918 Points
min: 2094     avg: 2153     median: 2153 (4%)     max: 2212 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5450 +
4 Points (57%)
108%
1 U7500 +
4.3 Points (61%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 → 103% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 → 63% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 22. 19:36:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 336 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 366 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 348 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734892589s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.002s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 336 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#9 got single benchmarks 336 +0.01s ... 0.012s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 366 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#11 got single benchmarks 366 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 348 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#13 got single benchmarks 348 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.029s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.029s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)