Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 vs Intel Core 2 Duo U7500

Intel Core 2 Duo T5450

► remove from comparison

OEM Prozessor

1.0375 - 1.3 V

MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64 (Intel's x86-64 implementation), XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), LaGrande Technology (Intel Trusted Execution Technology) Virtualization Technology

Die size: 111 mm²

Steppings: L2, M0

Intel Core 2 Duo U7500

Der Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 ist ein Stromspar-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks aus 2006. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern und punktet mit 64-Bit Unterstütztung und einem TDP von lediglich 10 Watt. Mit einer maximalen Taktrate von 1.1 GHz ist er die langsamste Variante der Core 2 Duo U7000 Serie.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5450Intel Core 2 Duo U7500
CodenameMerom-2048Merom-2048
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom-2048
Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 « 1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 compare1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 compare1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 « 1.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1660 MHz1060 MHz
FSB667533
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt10 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
SocketPBGA479
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Intel Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1015     avg: 1504     median: 1666 (10%)     max: 1669 Points
1116 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1919     avg: 2827     median: 3121.5 (2%)     max: 3144 Points
1976 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1344     avg: 1381     median: 1367 (3%)     max: 1433 Points
875 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5450 +
min: 33.62     avg: 33.8     median: 33.9 (7%)     max: 34 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5450 +
15268 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5450 +
10407 MFLOPS (8%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3322     avg: 3505     median: 3501 (7%)     max: 3813 Points
min: 2094     avg: 2153     median: 2153 (4%)     max: 2212 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4 Points (57%)
4.3 Points (61%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 → 73% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 22. 13:16:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 336 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 348 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734869812s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 336 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#8 got single benchmarks 336 +0.011s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 348 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 348 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.024s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.027s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)