Notebookcheck Logo

Rockchip RK3168 vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

Rockchip RK3168

► remove from comparison

Der Rockchip RK3168 ist ein günstiger ARM-SoC, der in erster Linie für Smartphones konzipiert wurde. Er bietet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 CPU-Kerne mit NEON-Erweiterung, eine PowerVR SGX 540 Grafikkarte (400 MHz) und einen Speichercontroller für (LP-)DDR2/DDR3. Die Performance sollte mit anderen, ähnlich getakteten Cortex-A9-SoCs wie dem Samsung Exynos 4210 vergleichbar sein. Dank fortschrittlicher 28-Nanometer-Fertigung dürfte der RK3168 aber deutlich weniger Energie benötigen und somit längere Akkulaufzeiten ermöglichen.

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

show full text
ModelRockchip RK3168WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950
Series
Serie: Cortex-A9
Google Tensor G4 compare1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1200 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 1
Technology28 nm
FeaturesPowerVR SGX 540 (400 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUPowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz)ARM Mali-400 MP
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.comwww.wondermedia.com.tw
CodenameCortex-A9

Benchmarks

Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 16. 17:49:46

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4129 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731775785s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.053s ... 0.053s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4129 +0.001s ... 0.054s

#8 got single benchmarks 4129 +0.003s ... 0.057s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.057s

#10 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.003s ... 0.06s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.06s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.062s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.065s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)