Notebookcheck Logo

Rockchip RK3168 vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs Marvell PXA986

Rockchip RK3168

► remove from comparison

Der Rockchip RK3168 ist ein günstiger ARM-SoC, der in erster Linie für Smartphones konzipiert wurde. Er bietet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 CPU-Kerne mit NEON-Erweiterung, eine PowerVR SGX 540 Grafikkarte (400 MHz) und einen Speichercontroller für (LP-)DDR2/DDR3. Die Performance sollte mit anderen, ähnlich getakteten Cortex-A9-SoCs wie dem Samsung Exynos 4210 vergleichbar sein. Dank fortschrittlicher 28-Nanometer-Fertigung dürfte der RK3168 aber deutlich weniger Energie benötigen und somit längere Akkulaufzeiten ermöglichen.

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

Marvell PXA986

► remove from comparison Marvell Technology Group PXA986

Der Marvell PXA986 ist ein ARM basierter Dual-Core SoC für Smartphones und Tablets. Er bietet zwei Cortex-A9 Kerne mit meist 1.2 GHz Takt, eine Vivante GC1000 Grafikkarte, einen Video-Prozessor für 720p30 Wiedergabe von H.263, H.264 BP und MPEG4- SP und ein WCDMA+HSDPA Modem.

show full text
ModelRockchip RK3168WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950Marvell PXA986
Series Marvell Technology Group
Serie: Cortex-A9
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1200 MHz1000 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 12 / 2
Technology28 nm45 nm
FeaturesPowerVR SGX 540 (400 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUPowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz)ARM Mali-400 MP
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.comwww.wondermedia.com.twwww.marvell.com
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 2623     avg: 2874     median: 2740 (2%)     max: 3258 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 2709     avg: 2985     median: 2985 (2%)     max: 3261 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 PXA986 +
3675 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 631     avg: 647     median: 646.5 (1%)     max: 662 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 376     avg: 379.5     median: 379.5 (7%)     max: 383 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 437     avg: 439.5     median: 439.5 (4%)     max: 442 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 1337     avg: 1448     median: 1448 (13%)     max: 1559 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 1275     avg: 1284     median: 1284 (3%)     max: 1293 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 709     avg: 720     median: 720 (1%)     max: 731 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 1005     avg: 1035     median: 1034.5 (3%)     max: 1064 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
240%
1 PXA986 +
min: 73.7     avg: 74.3     median: 74 (3%)     max: 75.3 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
110%
1 PXA986 +
min: 39.83     avg: 41.6     median: 41.4 (4%)     max: 43.69 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 23941     avg: 25315     median: 25315 (30%)     max: 26689 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
157%
1 PXA986 +
min: 1453     avg: 1531     median: 1530.5 (15%)     max: 1608 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 1428     avg: 1608     median: 1624 (18%)     max: 1771 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 PXA986 +
1448 Points (1%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
164%
1 PXA986 +
min: 3257     avg: 3515     median: 3514.5 (8%)     max: 3772 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
230%
1 PXA986 +
2945 Points (19%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 11051     avg: 11392     median: 11392 (26%)     max: 11733 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 137     avg: 160     median: 159 (5%)     max: 184 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 4077     avg: 4208     median: 4266 (14%)     max: 4281 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 3273     avg: 3820     median: 3976 (1%)     max: 4210 Points

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Marvell PXA986 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 16. 20:09:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4129 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 4461 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731784140s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4129 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 4129 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0s ... 0.007s

#11 got single benchmarks 3778 +0s ... 0.008s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 4461 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#13 got single benchmarks 4461 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.024s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.024s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)