Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200

Die NVIDIA Quadro M2200 ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 12_1) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Mittelklasse-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GTX 965M (2. Generation) auf den GM206 Chip mit Maxwell Architektur und noch nicht Pascal wie die stärkeren P-Quadros.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Der maximale Kerntakt der Quadro M2200 liegt bei 1.038 MHz. Die Leistung liegt zwischen der alten Quadro M2000M sowie der Quadro M3000M, liegt aber generell näher an der M3000M (in einigen Fällen sogar gleichauf). Wenig überraschend liegt die Leistung beim Spielen etwa auf dem Niveau der GTX 965M (2. Generation) und knapp hinter der aktuellen GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M2200M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro M2000M und liegt bei 55 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption) bzw 39,1 Watt TDP. Dadurch ist die Karte am besten für 15-Zoll-Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M520

► remove from comparison

Die NVIDIA Quadro M520 ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 11_0) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Einstiegs-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 940MX auf den GM108-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Wie auch einige Varianten der 940MX, bietet die M520 GDDR5 Grafikspeicher und sollte daher etwas schneller sein als die alte Quadro M500M mit DDR3, die sonst jedoch auf den selben Chip basiert.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Derzeit sind noch keine genauen Taktraten bekannt, jedoch sollte sich die Quadro M520 durch GDDR5 Grafikspeicher etwas schneller als die alte Quadro M500M sein.

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M520 liegt bei 25 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption) und dadurch etwas unterhalb der M500M die mit 30 Watt angegeben wurde. Dadurch ist die Karte auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M1200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1200

Die NVIDIA Quadro M1200 ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 11_0) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Mittelklasse-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 960M auf dem GM107-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Dadurch hinken Sie im Vergleich zu den stärkeren P-Quadros (Pascal basierend) etwas hinterher. Die Grafikkarte ist für die Skylake-Generation gedacht und Nachfolgerin der Quadro M2000M (basierend auf den gleichen Chip) bzw. Quadro M1000M (950M). Es werden bis zu 4 GB GDDR5 als Grafikspeicher eingesetzt die mit 1.250 MHz (5.000 MHz effektiv) takten und über einen 128 Bit Speicherbus angebunden sind (80 vs 48 GB/s bei der K2100M).

Die Taktraten sind laut internen Dokumenten zwischen 991 MHz (Base) und 1038 MHz (Boost), im Dell Precision taktet sie z.b. mit 1123 MHz.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Die Leistung der neueren M1200 ist auf einem Level mit der M2000M bei professionellen Anwendungen bzw. mit der GTX 960M bei Spielen. Alle drei Karten basieren auf den selben Chip bei vergleichbaren Taktraten.

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M1200M liegt laut Nvidia bei 45 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption) bzw. 32,5 Watt TDP. Dadurch ist die Karte am besten für 14-Zoll-Notebooks und größer geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M2200NVIDIA Quadro M520NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Quadro M Serie
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameN17P-Q3N17P-Q1
ArchitekturMaxwellMaxwellMaxwell
Pipelines1024 - unified384 - unified640 - unified
Kerntakt694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Speichertakt5508 MHz5000 MHz
Speicherbandbreite128 Bit64 Bit128 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR5GDDR5GDDR5
Max. Speichergröße4 GB1024 MB4 GB
Shared Memoryneinneinnein
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Stromverbrauch55 Watt25 Watt45 Watt
Transistors4.9 Billion1.9 Billion
Herstellungsprozess28 nm28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebookgrößegroß (17" z.B.)mittel (15.4" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum13.01.2017 13.01.2017 13.01.2017
Herstellerseitewww.nvidia.dewww.nvidia.dewww.nvidia.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2200
2.6 pt (8%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M520
1 pt (3%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1200
1.8 pt (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845     avg: 1889     median: 1903 (5%)     max: 1920 Points
684 Points (2%)
1290 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (5%)     max: 1750 Points
614 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203     avg: 289176     median: 289176 (29%)     max: 298148 Points
166193 Points (17%)
240298 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
20741 Points (2%)
42129 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20388     avg: 21012     median: 20644 (20%)     max: 22003 Points
8544 Points (8%)
min: 12632     avg: 14705     median: 13600 (13%)     max: 17884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 36877     avg: 37505     median: 37796 (9%)     max: 37841 Points
13394 Points (3%)
min: 26860     avg: 27557     median: 27557 (7%)     max: 28254 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (9%)     max: 5275 Points
2139 Points (4%)
min: 3759     avg: 3846     median: 3878 (7%)     max: 3900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5786     avg: 5835     median: 5850 (7%)     max: 5869 Points
2342 Points (3%)
min: 4118     avg: 4142     median: 4141.5 (5%)     max: 4165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 127867     avg: 195445     median: 195444 (22%)     max: 263022 Points
33703 Points (4%)
63463 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7453     avg: 7581     median: 7581 (10%)     max: 7709 Points
2884 Points (4%)
min: 5513     avg: 5515     median: 5514.5 (7%)     max: 5516 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7319     avg: 7372     median: 7372 (6%)     max: 7425 Points
2658 Points (2%)
min: 5105     avg: 5310     median: 5310 (5%)     max: 5515 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24622 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M520
11278 Points (3%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24915 Points (14%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M520
10861 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark 06
min: 26834     avg: 28150     median: 28149.5 (37%)     max: 29465 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
17305 Points (23%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
26109 Points (34%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (8%)     max: 28.1 fps
11.4 fps (3%)
27.7 fps (8%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
27.9 fps (9%)
30.1 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
28.8 fps (13%)
28.9 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
39.5 fps (7%)
28.1 fps (5%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 48.26     avg: 48.9     median: 48.9 (29%)     max: 49.48 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
31.3 fps (19%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
43.9 fps (26%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 49.11     avg: 51     median: 51 (29%)     max: 52.9 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
35.8 fps (20%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
44.2 fps (25%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 42.66     avg: 49.7     median: 49.7 (38%)     max: 56.8 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
43.7 fps (33%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
56.4 fps (43%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 16.23     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (23%)     max: 22.18 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
16.8 fps (20%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
22 fps (26%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 56.6     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (43%)     max: 57.7 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
50.8 fps (38%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.2 fps (43%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 47.95     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (57%)     max: 57.5 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
48.3 fps (52%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.8 fps (62%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 55.7     avg: 57.1     median: 57.1 (27%)     max: 58.5 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
24.8 fps (12%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
46.7 fps (22%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 48.49     avg: 50.6     median: 50.6 (27%)     max: 52.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
40.5 fps (21%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
53.3 fps (28%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 85.3     avg: 90.3     median: 86.2 (21%)     max: 99.5 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
45.9 fps (11%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 69     avg: 72.5     median: 70 (17%)     max: 78.4 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 57.7     avg: 58.3     median: 58.1 (9%)     max: 59 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
24.1 fps (4%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 34.18     avg: 35     median: 34.7 (5%)     max: 36 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 31.14     avg: 32.2     median: 32.8 (7%)     max: 32.8 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
11.8 fps (3%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 22.17     avg: 24.8     median: 26 (6%)     max: 26.2 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 20.34     avg: 23.6     median: 24.6 (6%)     max: 25.66 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
8.3 fps (2%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 17.49     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (5%)     max: 18 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 46.93     avg: 47.4     median: 46.9 (13%)     max: 48.34 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
19.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 32.07     avg: 34.4     median: 33.7 (9%)     max: 37.29 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 4.28     avg: 4.9     median: 5.2 (5%)     max: 5.26 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
0.5 fps (0%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 3.78     avg: 3.8     median: 3.9 (3%)     max: 3.9 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 68.2     avg: 69.3     median: 68.5 (27%)     max: 71.2 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
28 fps (11%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 45     avg: 46     median: 46.1 (18%)     max: 46.97 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 71.4     avg: 72.2     median: 72 (12%)     max: 73.2 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
26.2 fps (4%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 45.75     avg: 46.2     median: 45.9 (8%)     max: 47 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
19.7 fps (3%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
46 fps (8%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6833 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M520
6813 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
88.6 fps (29%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
70.9 fps (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
102.2 fps (34%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.9     avg: 107.4     median: 103.9 (6%)     max: 115.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
75.5 fps (4%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 102.8     avg: 108.2     median: 108.2 (6%)     max: 113.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
110.7 fps (12%)
53.1 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
163.7 fps (3%)
74.3 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219.1 fps (13%)
95.4 fps (6%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
432 fps (3%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
178.5 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1204     avg: 1276     median: 1306 (5%)     max: 1318 Samples/s
405 Samples/s (1%)
min: 656     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (3%)     max: 979 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2086     avg: 2097     median: 2099 (4%)     max: 2107 Samples/s
708 Samples/s (1%)
min: 852     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (2%)     max: 1562 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4332 Points (5%)
2045 Points (2%)
388 Points (0%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (10%)
34.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (12%)
43.4 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)
min: 74.8     avg: 87.5     median: 87.5 (19%)     max: 100.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
0.2 fps per Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
39.5 dB(A) (63%)
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 42.3     avg: 43.9     median: 43.9 (70%)     max: 45.5 dB(A)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M520 → 52% n=33

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 79% n=33

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
85.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
26.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
22  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
83.4  fps
46%
Quadro M520:
38.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
37.1  fps
39%
Quadro M520:
14.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
33.7  fps
36%
Quadro M520:
12  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
17.6  fps
20%
Quadro M520:
3.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
78  fps
83%
Quadro M520:
64.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps
43%
Quadro M520:
23  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps
43%
Quadro M520:
21.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps
43%
Quadro M520:
15.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
14.6  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
84  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
22.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
6.6  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
72.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
52.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
21.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
17.3  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
183.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
120.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
49.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
32.1  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M520:
13.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
139.4  fps
40%
Quadro M520:
56.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
105.3  fps
42%
Quadro M520:
43.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.1  fps
70%
Quadro M520:
33  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
42  fps
67%
Quadro M520:
28.2  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
50.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
30.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
15.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
11.7  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
27.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
21  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
11.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
5.3  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
79  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
66  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
37  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
34  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
12  fps
low 1280x768
Quadro M520:
23.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
14.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
12  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
52.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
31.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
14.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
11.2  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
46  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
20  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
18  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
12  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps
24%
Quadro M520:
30  fps
70%
Quadro M1200:
88.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps
30%
Quadro M520:
21.5  fps
69%
Quadro M1200:
49.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps
33%
Quadro M520:
13.3  fps
71%
Quadro M1200:
28.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps
34%
Quadro M520:
11.7  fps
70%
Quadro M1200:
23.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
13.7  fps
72%
Quadro M1200:
9.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
214.2  fps
44%
Quadro M520:
94.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
131.2  fps
46%
Quadro M520:
60.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.4  fps
45%
Quadro M520:
31.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
52.4  fps
44%
Quadro M520:
22.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M520:
8.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.8  fps
53%
Quadro M520:
78.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
119  fps
41%
Quadro M520:
48.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
56.4  fps
40%
Quadro M520:
22.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
48.2  fps
40%
Quadro M520:
19.1  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
60.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
36.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
17.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
7.4  fps
low 1366x768
Quadro M520:
135.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
108.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
54  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
36.7  fps
4K 3840 x 2160
Quadro M520:
11  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
74  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
63  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
35  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
29  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
11  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
104.6 116.6 ~ 111 fps
66%
Quadro M1200:
73.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
63.4 66.6 68.4 ~ 66 fps
70%
Quadro M1200:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
30.3 37.2 37.8 ~ 35 fps
80%
Quadro M1200:
26.3 29 ~ 28 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
18 20 20.3 ~ 19 fps
68%
Quadro M1200:
13  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
12.7  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
145.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
75.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
40.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
18.7  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M520:
14.7  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
81.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
74.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
30.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
19.6  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M520:
68.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M520:
51.7  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
12.2  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M520:
54.6  fps
med. 1344x756
Quadro M520:
32.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
22.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M520:
16.2  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
108.8  fps
86%
Quadro M1200:
93.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
88.6  fps
66%
Quadro M1200:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
74.8  fps
67%
Quadro M1200:
50.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
39.6  fps
66%
Quadro M1200:
26.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
171.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.3  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
115.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
229.4 270.9 ~ 250 fps
55%
Quadro M520:
138.2  fps
83%
Quadro M1200:
189 224.7 ~ 207 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
174.1 177.2 ~ 176 fps
44%
Quadro M520:
76.9  fps
76%
Quadro M1200:
130.8 137 ~ 134 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
149.1 155.5 ~ 152 fps
42%
Quadro M520:
64.1  fps
78%
Quadro M1200:
113.1 125 ~ 119 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
56.8 58.6 ~ 58 fps
42%
Quadro M520:
24.2  fps
78%
Quadro M1200:
42.6 47 ~ 45 fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
381.4  fps
49%
Quadro M520:
188.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
238.8  fps
41%
Quadro M520:
97.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
149.3  fps
40%
Quadro M520:
59.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.2  fps
41%
Quadro M520:
28.8  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M520 → 44%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 49%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 73%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 70%

NVIDIA Quadro M520lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Prey85.432.826.722
Ghost Recon Wildlands38.114.3123.6
For Honor64.62321.915.9
Resident Evil 7844022.16.6
Titanfall 272.252.521.317.3
Farming Simulator 17183.1120.649.832.113.7
Battlefield 156.443.93328.2
Civilization VI50.830.415.211.7
Deus Ex Mankind Divided27.22111.65.3
Ashes of the Singularity23.614.312
The Division52.231.814.811.2
Far Cry Primal46201812
Rise of the Tomb Raider3021.513.311.7
Rainbow Six Siege94.560.131.822.88.1
Star Wars Battlefront78.248.922.319.1
Anno 220560.136.217.77.4
World of Warships135.6108.15436.711
Dirt Rally145.675.140.518.714.7
Battlefield Hardline81.174.230.419.6
Dragon Age: Inquisition68.251.718.312.2
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor54.632.922.816.2
BioShock Infinite138.276.964.124.2
Tomb Raider188.197.959.528.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
7
9
5
6
10
6
1
15
7
1
20
2




4


NVIDIA Quadro M2200lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Ghost Recon Wildlands83.437.133.717.6
For Honor7854513714.6
Battlefield 1139.4105.347.142
Rise of the Tomb Raider12671403413.7
Rainbow Six Siege214.2131.270.452.4
Star Wars Battlefront148.811956.448.2
The Witcher 311166351912.7
Thief108.888.674.839.6
Battlefield 4171.5148.3115.947.8
BioShock Infinite25017615258
Tomb Raider381.4238.8149.370.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4
7

2
5
4

6
3
2
2
8
1



3


NVIDIA Quadro M1200lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Doom7966373412
Rise of the Tomb Raider88.149.1528.3623.929.88
Batman: Arkham Knight7463352911
The Witcher 373.645.92813
Thief93.358.950.126.2
BioShock Infinite20713411945
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
1

3
2
1
2
3
1
4
2




3


Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

v1.28
log 23. 12:42:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7706 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7710 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 7704 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732362136s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:17:45 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.021s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.021s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7706 +0.021s ... 0.042s

#10 got single benchmarks 7706 +0.006s ... 0.048s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 7710 +0.004s ... 0.052s

#12 got single benchmarks 7710 +0.004s ... 0.056s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 7704 +0.004s ... 0.059s

#14 got single benchmarks 7704 +0.005s ... 0.064s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.061s ... 0.125s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.125s

#18 Got 195 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.135s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.135s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.136s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.009s ... 0.145s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.145s

#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.146s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)