Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro M520 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200

NVIDIA Quadro M520

► remove from comparison

Die NVIDIA Quadro M520 ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 11_0) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Einstiegs-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 940MX auf den GM108-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Wie auch einige Varianten der 940MX, bietet die M520 GDDR5 Grafikspeicher und sollte daher etwas schneller sein als die alte Quadro M500M mit DDR3, die sonst jedoch auf den selben Chip basiert.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Derzeit sind noch keine genauen Taktraten bekannt, jedoch sollte sich die Quadro M520 durch GDDR5 Grafikspeicher etwas schneller als die alte Quadro M500M sein.

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M520 liegt bei 25 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption) und dadurch etwas unterhalb der M500M die mit 30 Watt angegeben wurde. Dadurch ist die Karte auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M1200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1200

Die NVIDIA Quadro M1200 ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 11_0) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Mittelklasse-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 960M auf dem GM107-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Dadurch hinken Sie im Vergleich zu den stärkeren P-Quadros (Pascal basierend) etwas hinterher. Die Grafikkarte ist für die Skylake-Generation gedacht und Nachfolgerin der Quadro M2000M (basierend auf den gleichen Chip) bzw. Quadro M1000M (950M). Es werden bis zu 4 GB GDDR5 als Grafikspeicher eingesetzt die mit 1.250 MHz (5.000 MHz effektiv) takten und über einen 128 Bit Speicherbus angebunden sind (80 vs 48 GB/s bei der K2100M).

Die Taktraten sind laut internen Dokumenten zwischen 991 MHz (Base) und 1038 MHz (Boost), im Dell Precision taktet sie z.b. mit 1123 MHz.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Die Leistung der neueren M1200 ist auf einem Level mit der M2000M bei professionellen Anwendungen bzw. mit der GTX 960M bei Spielen. Alle drei Karten basieren auf den selben Chip bei vergleichbaren Taktraten.

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M1200M liegt laut Nvidia bei 45 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption) bzw. 32,5 Watt TDP. Dadurch ist die Karte am besten für 14-Zoll-Notebooks und größer geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M520NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Quadro M Serie
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitekturMaxwellMaxwell
Pipelines384 - unified640 - unified
Kerntakt756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Speicherbandbreite64 Bit128 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Speichergröße1024 MB4 GB
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Stromverbrauch25 Watt45 Watt
Herstellungsprozess28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebookgrößemittel (15.4" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum13.01.2017 13.01.2017
Herstellerseitewww.nvidia.dewww.nvidia.de
CodenameN17P-Q1
Speichertakt5000 MHz
Transistors1.9 Billion

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M520
1 pt (3%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1200
1.8 pt (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
684 Points (2%)
1290 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
614 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
166193 Points (17%)
240298 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
20741 Points (2%)
42129 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
8544 Points (8%)
min: 12632     avg: 14705     median: 13600 (13%)     max: 17884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
13394 Points (3%)
min: 26860     avg: 27557     median: 27557 (7%)     max: 28254 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
2139 Points (4%)
min: 3759     avg: 3846     median: 3878 (7%)     max: 3900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2342 Points (3%)
min: 4118     avg: 4142     median: 4141.5 (5%)     max: 4165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
33703 Points (4%)
63463 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
2884 Points (4%)
min: 5513     avg: 5515     median: 5514.5 (7%)     max: 5516 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2658 Points (2%)
min: 5105     avg: 5310     median: 5310 (5%)     max: 5515 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M520
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
11278 Points (3%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M520
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
10861 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
3DMark 06
17305 Points (23%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
26109 Points (34%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
11.4 fps (3%)
27.7 fps (8%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
27.9 fps (9%)
30.1 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
28.8 fps (13%)
28.9 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
39.5 fps (7%)
28.1 fps (5%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
31.3 fps (19%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
43.9 fps (26%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
35.8 fps (20%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
44.2 fps (25%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
43.7 fps (33%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
56.4 fps (43%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
16.8 fps (20%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
22 fps (26%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
50.8 fps (38%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.2 fps (43%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
48.3 fps (52%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
57.8 fps (62%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
24.8 fps (12%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
46.7 fps (22%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
40.5 fps (21%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
53.3 fps (28%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
45.9 fps (11%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 69     avg: 72.5     median: 70 (17%)     max: 78.4 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
24.1 fps (4%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 34.18     avg: 35     median: 34.7 (5%)     max: 36 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
11.8 fps (3%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 22.17     avg: 24.8     median: 26 (6%)     max: 26.2 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
8.3 fps (2%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 17.49     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (5%)     max: 18 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
19.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 32.07     avg: 34.4     median: 33.7 (9%)     max: 37.29 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.5 fps (0%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 3.78     avg: 3.8     median: 3.9 (3%)     max: 3.9 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
28 fps (11%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 45     avg: 46     median: 46.1 (18%)     max: 46.97 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
26.2 fps (4%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 45.75     avg: 46.2     median: 45.9 (8%)     max: 47 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
19.7 fps (3%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
46 fps (8%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M520
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6813 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
70.9 fps (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
102.2 fps (34%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
75.5 fps (4%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
min: 102.8     avg: 108.2     median: 108.2 (6%)     max: 113.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
53.1 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
74.3 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
95.4 fps (6%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
178.5 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
405 Samples/s (1%)
min: 656     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (3%)     max: 979 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
708 Samples/s (1%)
min: 852     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (2%)     max: 1562 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2045 Points (2%)
388 Points (0%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
34.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
43.4 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 74.8     avg: 87.5     median: 87.5 (19%)     max: 100.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (16%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 42.3     avg: 43.9     median: 43.9 (70%)     max: 45.5 dB(A)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M520 → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 173% n=38

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
85.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
26.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
22  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
38.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
14.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
12  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
3.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
64.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
23  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
21.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
15.9  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
84  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
22.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
6.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
72.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
52.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
21.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
17.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
183.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
120.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
49.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
32.1  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M520:
13.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
56.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
43.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
33  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
28.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
50.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
30.4  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
15.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
11.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
27.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
21  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
11.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
5.3  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
79  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
66  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
37  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
34  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
12  fps
low 1280x768
100%
Quadro M520:
23.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
14.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
12  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
52.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
31.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
14.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
11.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
46  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
20  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
18  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
12  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
30  fps
294%
Quadro M1200:
88.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
21.5  fps
229%
Quadro M1200:
49.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
13.3  fps
213%
Quadro M1200:
28.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
11.7  fps
204%
Quadro M1200:
23.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
9.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
94.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
60.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
31.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
22.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M520:
8.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
78.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
48.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
22.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
19.1  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
60.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
36.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
17.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
7.4  fps
low 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
135.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
108.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
54  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
36.7  fps
4K 3840 x 2160
100%
Quadro M520:
11  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
74  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
63  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
35  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
29  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
11  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M1200:
73.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
26.3 29 ~ 28 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
13  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
145.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
75.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
40.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
18.7  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M520:
14.7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
81.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
74.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
30.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
19.6  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
68.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
51.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
12.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
54.6  fps
med. 1344x756
100%
Quadro M520:
32.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
22.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
16.2  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M1200:
93.3  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
50.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
26.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
138.2  fps
150%
Quadro M1200:
189 224.7 ~ 207 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
76.9  fps
174%
Quadro M1200:
130.8 137 ~ 134 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
64.1  fps
186%
Quadro M1200:
113.1 125 ~ 119 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
24.2  fps
186%
Quadro M1200:
42.6 47 ~ 45 fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
188.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
97.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
59.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
28.8  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M520 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 204%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 207%

NVIDIA Quadro M520lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Prey85.432.826.722
Ghost Recon Wildlands38.114.3123.6
For Honor64.62321.915.9
Resident Evil 7844022.16.6
Titanfall 272.252.521.317.3
Farming Simulator 17183.1120.649.832.113.7
Battlefield 156.443.93328.2
Civilization VI50.830.415.211.7
Deus Ex Mankind Divided27.22111.65.3
Ashes of the Singularity23.614.312
The Division52.231.814.811.2
Far Cry Primal46201812
Rise of the Tomb Raider3021.513.311.7
Rainbow Six Siege94.560.131.822.88.1
Star Wars Battlefront78.248.922.319.1
Anno 220560.136.217.77.4
World of Warships135.6108.15436.711
Dirt Rally145.675.140.518.714.7
Battlefield Hardline81.174.230.419.6
Dragon Age: Inquisition68.251.718.312.2
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor54.632.922.816.2
BioShock Infinite138.276.964.124.2
Tomb Raider188.197.959.528.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
7
9
5
6
10
6
1
15
7
1
20
2




4


NVIDIA Quadro M1200lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Doom7966373412
Rise of the Tomb Raider88.149.1528.3623.929.88
Batman: Arkham Knight7463352911
The Witcher 373.645.92813
Thief93.358.950.126.2
BioShock Infinite20713411945
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
1

3
2
1
2
3
1
4
2




3


Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 23:41:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7710 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7704 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732228893s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.019s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7710 +0.018s ... 0.037s

#9 got single benchmarks 7710 +0.004s ... 0.041s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7704 +0.003s ... 0.044s

#11 got single benchmarks 7704 +0.005s ... 0.049s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.086s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.086s

#15 Got 127 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.093s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.093s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.095s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.009s ... 0.103s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.103s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.106s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)