Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Im Vergleich zu den stärkeren Modellen bietet, der P8800 zwar nur die Hälfte an Level 2 Cache, jedoch bleibt dadurch der Stromverbrauch mit maximal 25 Watt auch geringer. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.66 GHz, ist die Performance jedoch für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert von einem schnelleren Prozessor). Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.
Intel Core i3-1115G4 ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i3-1115G4 ist ein sparsamer Dual-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Tiger-Lake-Architektur basiert und im September 2020 vorgestellt wurde. Tiger Lake wird im verbesserten 10nm+-Verfahren (SuperFin genannt) bei Intel gefertigt und nutzt die neuen Willow Cove CPU-Kerne mit einer neuen Mikroarchitektur. Der Intel Core i5-1115G4 bietet zwei Kerne mit Hyperthreading (4 Threads) und 3 GHz Basistakt bis 4,1 GHz Turbo-Takt (auch wenn beide Kerne genutzt werden).
Eine weitere Neuerung ist die integrierte Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 Grafikkarte (Gen 12) welche eine deutlich höhere Leistung wie die alte Iris Plus G7 in Ice Lake bieten soll. Im 1115G7 bietet die UHD Graphics jedoch nur 48 der 96 EUs bei einem Takt von 400 - 1250 MHz.
Wie bisher wird auch weiterhin WLAN (Wifi 6) und nun auch Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 und 4 Lanes PCIe 4 im Chip (teil-)integriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks.
Der TDP kann bei den UP3 CPUs von 12 - 28 Watt gewählt werden und dadurch eignet sich die CPU auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks.
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 ist ein CULV Notebookprozessor für kleine und flache Notebooks. Durch die geringe Taktrate von nur 1.3 GHz ist die CPU auf lediglich 10 Watt TDP spezifiziert. Die Performance ist dadurch realtiv gering, für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend und nicht so einschränkend, wie bei Atom basierenden Netbooks.
In vielen Notebooks (z.B. Asus UL Serie) kann die CPU werksmäßig deutlich übertaktet werden (auf z.B. 1.7 GHz) wodurch auch die Leistung deutlich steigt.
Model Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 Intel Core i3-1115G4 Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 Series Intel Core 2 Duo Intel Tiger Lake Intel Core 2 Duo Codename Penryn Tiger Lake-UP3 Penryn Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn Clock 2660 MHz 3000 - 4100 MHz 1300 MHz FSB 1066 800 L1 Cache 128 KB 160 KB L2 Cache 3 MB 2.5 MB 3 MB Cores / Threads 2 / 2 2 / 4 2 / 2 TDP 25 Watt 28 Watt 10 Watt Transistors 410 Million 410 Million Technology 45 nm, 1.00V-1.25V 10 nm 45 nm Die Size 107 mm2 107 mm2 max. Temp. 105 °C 100 °C 105 °C Socket BGA479, PGA478 BGA1449 BGA956 Features SSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-3733 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA Enhanced Speedstep, VT-x, TXT Architecture x86 x86 x86 $241 U.S. Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com ark.intel.com L3 Cache 6 MB iGPU Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-1115G4
29.4 pt (49%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2725 avg: 3038 median: 3125 (3%) max: 3244 Points
CPU TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 100% 85% 100% 92% 93%
392 Points (0%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 12% 100% 85% 100% 92% 93%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1242 avg: 1299 median: 1312 (56%) max: 1319 Points
CPU TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 99% 100% 99% 94% 99%
208 Points (9%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 16% 99% 100% 99% 94% 99%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 504 avg: 507 median: 504.5 (56%) max: 515 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 98% 98% 98% 98% 100% 98%
84 Points (9%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 43% 98% 98% 98% 100% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 961 avg: 1120 median: 1114 (3%) max: 1251 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 77% 100% 86% 100% 83% 92%
min: 149 avg: 154.5 median: 154.5 (0%) max: 160 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 34% 100% 86% 100% 83% 92%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 384.7 avg: 461.6 median: 480.5 (3%) max: 507 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 76% 97% 82% 99% 100% 92%
min: 72 avg: 72.2 median: 72.2 (0%) max: 72.4 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 30% 97% 82% 99% 100% 92%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 137 avg: 179.9 median: 190 (55%) max: 197 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 98% 98% 70% 87% 100% 95%
min: 38.39 avg: 38.7 median: 38.7 (11%) max: 39 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 39% 98% 70% 87% 100% 95%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.5 Points (2%)
min: 0.77 avg: 0.8 median: 0.8 (1%) max: 0.79 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2798 avg: 2890 median: 2932 (18%) max: 2940 Points
8018 Points (48%)
min: 869 avg: 1462 median: 1496 (9%) max: 1645 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5240 avg: 5357 median: 5370 (4%) max: 5460 Points
16265 Points (12%)
min: 1642 avg: 2777 median: 2813 (2%) max: 3181 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 3020 avg: 3045 median: 3045.5 (2%) max: 3067 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1501 avg: 1576 median: 1586 (2%) max: 1629 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 982 avg: 994 median: 993.5 (12%) max: 1005 s
412.8 s (5%)
min: 2029 avg: 3417 median: 3615 (43%) max: 4608 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 30.8 avg: 31.4 median: 31.4 (6%) max: 31.9 s
11.8 s (2%)
min: 37.2 avg: 67.6 median: 61.3 (12%) max: 118.5 s
885 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 11122 avg: 12669 median: 12919.5 (7%) max: 13422 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 83% 97% 95% 94% 100% 97%
min: 2492 avg: 2515 median: 2514.5 (1%) max: 2537 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 40% 97% 95% 94% 100% 97%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4497 avg: 4586 median: 4599.5 (55%) max: 4674 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 99% 96% 100% 98% 98% 97%
min: 1445 avg: 1450 median: 1450 (17%) max: 1455 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 54% 96% 100% 98% 98% 97%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
26.2 fps (9%)
4.8 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
141.6 fps (33%)
26.5 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.25 avg: 3.7 median: 3.7 (7%) max: 4.1 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 79% 100% 88% 85% 97% 94%
0.5 fps (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 45% 100% 88% 85% 97% 94%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (7%)
0 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (7%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.8 GB/s (7%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2408 Seconds (31%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 940 avg: 1037 median: 1021.5 (7%) max: 1188 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 100% 102% 101% 101% 102% 102%
8394 Seconds (59%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 100% 141% 139% 140% 141% 140%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.636 avg: 0.7 median: 0.7 (14%) max: 0.671 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 100% 100% 101% 100% 100% 100%
min: 2.84 avg: 2.9 median: 2.9 (62%) max: 2.86 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 100% 171% 172% 171% 171% 171%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2309 avg: 2355 median: 2355 (5%) max: 2401 Points
6331 Points (13%)
min: 1078 avg: 1167 median: 1178 (3%) max: 1229 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 19 avg: 19.5 median: 19.5 (4%) max: 19.9 s
8.2 s (2%)
min: 22 avg: 34.2 median: 37.2 (8%) max: 38 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 44 avg: 45.6 median: 45.6 (2%) max: 47.2 s
18.4 s (1%)
min: 54 avg: 78 median: 85 (4%) max: 88 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 961 avg: 1049 median: 1048.5 (5%) max: 1136 s
434.8 s (2%)
min: 1341 avg: 1830 median: 2059 (9%) max: 2091 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 24450 avg: 26155 median: 26155 (12%) max: 27860 MIPS
min: 10480 avg: 11679 median: 11968.5 (6%) max: 12300 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
18000 MFLOPS (14%)
min: 8790 avg: 9118 median: 8911 (7%) max: 9860 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2440 avg: 2819 median: 2819 (6%) max: 3198 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.2 Points (60%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
6.3 Points (81%)
4.1 Points (53%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
4658 Points (4%)
16869 Points (15%)
min: 2303 avg: 2494 median: 2579 (2%) max: 2600 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5128 avg: 5771 median: 5579.5 (15%) max: 6640 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 77% 84% 83% 85% 100% 93%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 57115 avg: 59888 median: 60028 (49%) max: 62520 Points
CPU TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W 96% 91% 100%
11926 Points (10%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W 19% 96% 91% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 48647 avg: 55626 median: 56348 (46%) max: 61883 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 28 W 79% 91% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 65022 avg: 65592 median: 65591.5 (55%) max: 66161 Points
CPU TDP 15 W TDP 28 W 98% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3986 avg: 4871 median: 5038 (13%) max: 5250 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 76% 92% 97% 96% 100% 96%
983 Points (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 38% 92% 97% 96% 100% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6125 avg: 7184 median: 7331.5 (13%) max: 7786 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 79% 90% 97% 92% 100% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2227 avg: 2623 median: 2635 (11%) max: 2937 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 76% 89% 84% 90% 100% 97%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5487 Points (65%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1190 avg: 1296 median: 1311.5 (52%) max: 1352 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 93% 95% 99% 94% 100% 100%
207 Points (8%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 62% 95% 99% 94% 100% 100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2341 avg: 2628 median: 2605 (5%) max: 2983 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 83% 84% 94% 84% 100% 92%
392 Points (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 55% 84% 94% 84% 100% 92%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1328 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2399 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5601 Points (56%)
1024 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9945 Points (11%)
1707 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
1536 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
855 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 657.9 avg: 749 median: 755 (1%) max: 805 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
145.8 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 49170 avg: 55606 median: 58151 (51%) max: 59497 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 40 W 93% 100%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
152.3 Points (44%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 200 avg: 213.7 median: 204.5 (43%) max: 257 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 40 W 100% 90% 93% 89% 89%
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
20509 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
11801 Points (55%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 950 avg: 1029 median: 1033 (40%) max: 1094 Points
CPU TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 87% 100% 92% 94% 96%
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
147 Points (81%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.7 avg: 36.1 median: 35.2 (6%) max: 44.6 Watt
CPU TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 101% 104% 102% 100% 102%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.6 avg: 36.3 median: 39.1 (7%) max: 41.3 Watt
CPU TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 40 W 100% 103% 100% 100% 101%
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
22.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.66 avg: 6.2 median: 5.8 (6%) max: 7.67 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 40 W 102% 102% 100% 102%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.1 avg: 13.5 median: 12.8 (10%) max: 16.3 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 8 W TDP 15 W TDP 20 W TDP 28 W 77% 100% 74% 80%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 → 100% n=9 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-1115G4 → 271% n=9 Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 → 49% n=9
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 13. 02:24:18
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 477 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 12242 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 503 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728779058s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Oct 2024 05:17:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 477 +0s ... 0.003s
#9 got single benchmarks 477 +0s ... 0.004s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12242 +0.002s ... 0.005s
#11 got single benchmarks 12242 +0.003s ... 0.008s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 503 +0.001s ... 0.009s
#13 got single benchmarks 503 +0.021s ... 0.03s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s
#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.035s
#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.041s
#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.045s
#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.046s
#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.02s ... 0.066s
#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.067s
#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.068s
#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.068s
#23 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.073s
#24 return log +0s ... 0.073s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)