Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300

Intel Core i3-1115G4

► remove from comparison Intel i3-1115G4

Der Intel Core i3-1115G4 ist ein sparsamer Dual-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Tiger-Lake-Architektur basiert und im September 2020 vorgestellt wurde. Tiger Lake wird im verbesserten 10nm+-Verfahren (SuperFin genannt) bei Intel gefertigt und nutzt die neuen Willow Cove CPU-Kerne mit einer neuen Mikroarchitektur. Der Intel Core i5-1115G4 bietet zwei Kerne mit Hyperthreading (4 Threads) und 3 GHz Basistakt bis 4,1 GHz Turbo-Takt (auch wenn beide Kerne genutzt werden). 

Eine weitere Neuerung ist die integrierte Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 Grafikkarte (Gen 12) welche eine deutlich höhere Leistung wie die alte Iris Plus G7 in Ice Lake bieten soll. Im 1115G7 bietet die UHD Graphics jedoch nur 48 der 96 EUs bei einem Takt von 400 - 1250 MHz.

Wie bisher wird auch weiterhin WLAN (Wifi 6) und nun auch Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 und 4 Lanes PCIe 4 im Chip (teil-)integriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks.

Der TDP kann bei den UP3 CPUs von 12 - 28 Watt gewählt werden und dadurch eignet sich die CPU auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks.

Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 ist ein CULV Notebookprozessor für kleine und flache Notebooks. Durch die geringe Taktrate von nur 1.3 GHz ist die CPU auf lediglich 10 Watt TDP spezifiziert. Die Performance ist dadurch realtiv gering, für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend und nicht so einschränkend, wie bei Atom basierenden Netbooks.

In vielen Notebooks (z.B. Asus UL Serie) kann die CPU werksmäßig deutlich übertaktet werden (auf z.B. 1.7 GHz) wodurch auch die Leistung deutlich steigt.

ModelIntel Core i3-1115G4Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3Penryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 « 3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 « 1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock3000 - 4100 MHz1300 MHz
L1 Cache160 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB3 MB
L3 Cache6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP28 Watt10 Watt
Technology10 nm45 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1449BGA956
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-3733 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAEnhanced Speedstep, VT-x, TXT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
FSB800
Transistors410 Million
Die Size107 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-1115G4
29.4 pt (49%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2725     avg: 3038     median: 3125 (3%)     max: 3244 Points
392 Points (0%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1242     avg: 1299     median: 1312 (56%)     max: 1319 Points
208 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 504     avg: 507     median: 504.5 (56%)     max: 515 Points
84 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 961     avg: 1120     median: 1114 (3%)     max: 1251 Points
min: 149     avg: 154.5     median: 154.5 (0%)     max: 160 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 384.7     avg: 461.6     median: 480.5 (3%)     max: 507 Points
min: 72     avg: 72.2     median: 72.2 (0%)     max: 72.4 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 137     avg: 179.9     median: 190 (55%)     max: 197 Points
min: 38.39     avg: 38.7     median: 38.7 (11%)     max: 39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 0.77     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.79 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8018 Points (48%)
min: 869     avg: 1462     median: 1496 (9%)     max: 1645 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
16265 Points (12%)
min: 1642     avg: 2777     median: 2813 (2%)     max: 3181 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 3020     avg: 3045     median: 3045.5 (2%)     max: 3067 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 1501     avg: 1576     median: 1586 (2%)     max: 1629 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
412.8 s (5%)
min: 2029     avg: 3417     median: 3615 (43%)     max: 4608 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.8 s (2%)
min: 37.2     avg: 67.6     median: 61.3 (12%)     max: 118.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
885 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 11122     avg: 12669     median: 12919.5 (7%)     max: 13422 MIPS
min: 2492     avg: 2515     median: 2514.5 (1%)     max: 2537 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4497     avg: 4586     median: 4599.5 (55%)     max: 4674 MIPS
min: 1445     avg: 1450     median: 1450 (17%)     max: 1455 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
26.2 fps (9%)
4.8 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
141.6 fps (33%)
26.5 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.25     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (7%)     max: 4.1 fps
0.5 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (7%)
0 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (7%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.8 GB/s (7%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2408 Seconds (31%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 940     avg: 1037     median: 1021.5 (7%)     max: 1188 Seconds
8394 Seconds (59%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.636     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.671 sec
min: 2.84     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (62%)     max: 2.86 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6331 Points (13%)
min: 1078     avg: 1167     median: 1178 (3%)     max: 1229 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 s (2%)
min: 22     avg: 34.2     median: 37.2 (8%)     max: 38 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.4 s (1%)
min: 54     avg: 78     median: 85 (4%)     max: 88 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
434.8 s (2%)
min: 1341     avg: 1830     median: 2059 (9%)     max: 2091 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 10480     avg: 11679     median: 11968.5 (6%)     max: 12300 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 8790     avg: 9118     median: 8911 (7%)     max: 9860 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 2440     avg: 2819     median: 2819 (6%)     max: 3198 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 SU7300 +
4.2 Points (60%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SU7300 +
4.1 Points (53%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
16869 Points (15%)
min: 2303     avg: 2494     median: 2579 (2%)     max: 2600 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5128     avg: 5771     median: 5579.5 (15%)     max: 6640 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 57115     avg: 59888     median: 60028 (49%)     max: 62520 Points
11926 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 48647     avg: 55626     median: 56348 (46%)     max: 61883 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 65022     avg: 65592     median: 65591.5 (55%)     max: 66161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3986     avg: 4871     median: 5038 (13%)     max: 5250 Points
983 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6125     avg: 7184     median: 7331.5 (13%)     max: 7786 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2227     avg: 2623     median: 2635 (11%)     max: 2937 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5487 Points (65%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1190     avg: 1296     median: 1311.5 (52%)     max: 1352 Points
207 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2341     avg: 2628     median: 2605 (5%)     max: 2983 Points
392 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1328 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2399 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5601 Points (56%)
1024 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9945 Points (11%)
1707 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
1536 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
855 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 657.9     avg: 749     median: 755 (1%)     max: 805 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
145.8 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 49170     avg: 55606     median: 58151 (51%)     max: 59497 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
152.3 Points (44%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 200     avg: 213.7     median: 204.5 (43%)     max: 257 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
20509 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
11801 Points (55%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 950     avg: 1029     median: 1033 (40%)     max: 1094 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
147 Points (81%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.7     avg: 36.1     median: 35.2 (6%)     max: 44.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.6     avg: 36.3     median: 39.1 (7%)     max: 41.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
22.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.66     avg: 6.2     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 7.67 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.1     avg: 13.5     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 16.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-1115G4 → 100% n=31

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 → 18% n=31

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 12. 16:34:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12242 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 503 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728743648s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Oct 2024 05:17:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12242 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 12242 +0.011s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 503 +0s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 503 +0.012s ... 0.03s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.035s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.039s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.041s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.042s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.016s ... 0.058s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.059s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.059s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.059s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.066s

#21 return log +0.002s ... 0.069s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)