Oppo Reno11 F
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.4, 22mm, 0.8µm
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 25 Bewertungen (aus 64 Tests)
Testberichte für das Oppo Reno11 F
Quelle: Stuff TV EN→DE
There wasn’t a single area I felt the Oppo Reno 11 F put in a bad showing, considering its asking price – but equally there weren’t many areas where it properly blew me away. And with so many alternatives to choose from, I’m not convinced this is the affordable phone for everyone. It lacks the Nothing Phone 2a’s standout design; it can’t match the Poco X6 Pro for performance; and Oppo’s take on Android is busier than the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion. A Google Pixel 7a can be had for roughly the same money, and is the clear winner for photography. If you want a long-lasting handset that can brave the elements, though, the Reno is absolutely worth a look.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Tech Guru Daily EN→DE
The Oppo Reno 11F 5G, priced at just $599, is quite a capable device at this price with the sort of features and design that would make you think it should be priced even higher. Many people who paid more for their smartphone will be wondering why if they ever get the Reno 11F 5G in their hand.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
For the price of NPR 44,000, this phone is a decent option. Although the Galaxy A35 offers better specs (in a few segments), it is also more expensive and falls short in performance, an area where Oppo has paid attention. My main complaint with this phone is its single speaker – MEH! I was expecting a good set of stereo speakers but it is what it is. Additionally, having a glass back might have enhanced its appeal further. Apart from these points, everything else about the phone is quite good. Thus, for its price, the Oppo Reno 11F 5G is a decent mid-range option focused on efficiency and overall user experience. However, if you’re looking for better performance in a similar price range, consider the Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus. It features the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset, which offers superior GPU and CPU performance, but at a slightly higher price of Rs. 47,999.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 75% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE
Overall, the Oppo Reno 11F 5G is a strong midrange option. Priced at PHP18,999, it offers a premium aesthetic, satisfactory performance, and good battery life, making it a worthwhile purchase. While it may not excel in gaming, it serves as a capable and efficient device. Although other smartphones may provide more features at a similar price point, the Oppo Reno 11F 5G remains a solid choice for Oppo enthusiasts.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.04.2024
Quelle: Manila Shaker
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.04.2024
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
The Oppo Reno 11F is a good phone, and I’ve enjoyed using it. For a reasonable sum, you can expect a lovely display, excellent battery life, capable cameras and speedy charging. The problem comes from the competition. Oppo is selling the Reno 11F at a special introductory pre-order price of just £259, but the promotion only runs for 7 days, starting on April 8, 2024 over on Oppo’s website, then the Reno 11F will jump up to its usual selling price of £349. At the promotional price, this phone is a steal. You’d have a very hard time matching the quality and specifications without spending significantly more. However, at full price, I think there are more compelling options, and the Reno 11F doesn’t do enough to stand out from the crowd. For example, the Honor Magic 6 Lite is cheaper, has a longer-lasting battery, and comparable specs elsewhere.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech Spurt
Reviewing the Oppo Reno 11F 5G, a mid-range smartphone hitting the UK for £349. I've been using the Oppo Reno 11 F 5G as my full-time phone for a few days so here's the camera, gaming, battery life and everyday experience, summed up. Check out my reviews of my favourite Androids here on Tech Spurt. The absolute highlight of the Oppo Reno 11F 5G is that battery, with a full charge often lasting two days. Performance has been a bit more hit and miss. Everyday running has been a bit more hit and miss. Things are improving however, and you can game on Genshin Impact, PubG etc on the Reno 11F 5G. As long as you don't boost the graphics. Oppo's camera setup is typical for this price point. You'll get good photos on the Oppo Reno 11F 5G if the lighting isn't too dodgy, but the video chops aren't as strong. And while you can expand the storage and I like the ColorOS experience, this phone has other drawbacks. Such as a lack of stereo audio output.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.04.2024
Quelle: NLT EN→DE
Now, you might have realized that I’m pretty much speedrunning this entire review. It’s not because I think this phone is uninteresting, but because this phone in itself is pretty simple. However, the price of it is what enticed me the most. For just RM1,399, you can buy the OPPO Reno11 F. When we compare it with OPPO’s very own Reno11 5G, this phone is a few hundred Ringgit cheaper. The main differences are mostly within the camera aspect. But they both use the same screen, same chipset, and have the same battery capacity and also the same fast charger. Immediately, the Reno11 F becomes a very good choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.03.2024
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE
To wrap this up, the OPPO Reno11 F 5G might not be the top dog in the pack, but it’s one of the playful pups that wags its tail the hardest. Sure, it might not be the most hardcore gamer out there, but it knows how to entertain with smooth performance and an above-average battery life. The “F” might stand for “fun,” but it also seems to stand for “functionality.” Bloatware might be a bit of a buzzkill, and the design language might be a tad inconsistent in my opinion, but these are minor gripes in the grand scheme of things. If you’re looking for a phone that delivers a solid performance, vibrant visuals, great cameras, and a touch of personality without breaking the bank, the OPPO Reno11 F 5G deserves a spot on your shortlist. Speaking of, we currently don’t have the final price for the OPPO Reno11 F 5G, but we’ll update this article once the device officially launches in the Philippines.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.03.2024
Quelle: Yugatech
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.03.2024
Quelle: Gadgetguy EN→DE
Equipped with dual microphones, the Enco Buds 2 Pro use AI technology to filter out background noise, helping you sound clearer during phone calls. They’re advertised to last up to eight hours on a single charge when listening to music, stretching out to 38 hours with the included charging case. Available in Australia starting on 1 March, you’ll be able to grab the affordable earbuds from Oppo’s website. Although they may not have active noise cancellation like many of the best headphones, it’s perfectly reasonable for the low asking price. The new mobile tech on the way adds to the brand’s fast start to 2024, having already launched the Oppo A79 5G and A18 phones. Recently crowned the fourth best-selling phone company in the world by the IDC, Oppo seems to be doing pretty well for itself.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 27.02.2024
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
The Oppo Reno11 F is a decent mid-range phone, which is capable of providing high-end graphics and performance. Besides this, the Oppo phones are known for their stunning camera quality, and it’s also appropriate for this phone. Apart from offering an impressive design, the phone also good display, superb camera, and long-lasting battery. Although, the phone does lack when it comes to real-time photography. Following this, the device is exclusive to the Thailand smartphone market. If the device isn’t available in your country, then you should consider getting a different phone. The Redmi Note 13 Pro could be the perfect alternative to this smartphone as you will receive better camera support, faster charging, and a high-end display. Not to forget, you will also receive improved MIUI 14 customization. After going through alternatives, make the final decision that fits your requirements and budget.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.02.2024
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 83% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79%
Quelle: El Español ES→DE
Positive: Slim size; light weight; stylish design; nice performance; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.04.2024
Quelle: Showmetech.com.br PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.08.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 100%
Quelle: Tudo Celular PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.08.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 60%
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.08.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: 4G News PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Showmetech.com.br PT→DE
Positive: Great AMOLED display; decent hardware; high performance; long battery life; modern connectivity. Negative: Average cameras; mediocre design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 14.09.2024
Quelle: Techzilla.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Preis: 80% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Batista70Phone IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 15.05.2024
Quelle: Mister Gadget IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Smart World IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Preis: 70% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Smart World IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Preis: 70% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Wired IT IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 65% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 93% Gehäuse: 79%
Quelle: Igizmo IT→DE
Positive: Nice main camera; big screen; bright OLED display. Negative: Average performance; many bloatwares; no charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.10.2024
Quelle: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; beautiful display; affordable price; long battery life; quick charging; tough device. Negative: Average performance; poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.04.2024
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Positive: Affordable price; elegant design; great built quality; nice display; decent cameras; long battery life. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.04.2024
Quelle: GadgetGear.nl NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Techno Strefa PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Co Nowego PL→DE
Positive: Fast 5G connection; powerful processor; excellent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.06.2024
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE
Positive: Beautiful AMOLED screen; 8GB RAM; fast 67W charging; large battery capacity; support 5G; elegant design; nice main camera. Negative: No charger included; mono speakers; no headphone jack.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.05.2024
Quelle: GSM Online PL→DE
Positive: Waterproof IP65; quick 67W charging; long battery life; modern design; beautiful AMOLED display. Negative: Mono speakers; poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.04.2024
Quelle: Instalki PL→DE
Positive: Elegant design; waterproof IP65; high performance; bright OLED display; long battery life; quick 67W charging. Negative: No charger included; poor cameras; many bloatwares; mono speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.04.2024
Quelle: Chip Online TR TR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Log.com.tr TR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: ITC UA RU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 07.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 60% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 70% Ergonomie: 70%
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Impressive design; solid workmanship; beautiful display; decent processor; nice performance; great cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; nice cameras; decent performance; good autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 02.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; decent processor; high performance; long battery life; very quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 22.03.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; impressive display; high performance; nice cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 20.03.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Frameless display; bright display; slim size; light weight; great speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.03.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; large RAM & ROM; long battery life; quick charging; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.03.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Impressive design; great AMOLED display; decent hardware; good price; large battery capacity; nice triple cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.03.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; slim size; light weight; beautiful display; decent performance; long battery life; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.03.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; decent performance; nice cameras; large battery capacity; quick 67W charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.03.2024
Quelle: XT Mobile VN→DE
Positive: Trendy design; nice cameras; long battery life; quick charging; excellent display. Negative: Average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.03.2024
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Decent processor; good price. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.03.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Trendy design; great built quality; decent performance; beautiful display; attractive price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.03.2024
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Impressive design; solid workmanship; thin frames; decent processor; great price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.03.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Trendy design; great built quality; nice cameras; good hardware; large battery capacity; quick 67W charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 06.03.2024
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; decent gaming performance; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.03.2024
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; solid workmanship; decent cameras. Negative: Average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.03.2024
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; great built quality; powerful processor; high performance; nice cameras.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.03.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Modern design; waterproof and dust avoiding; great AMOLED display; nice triple cameras; high performance; good autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.03.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; great cameras; quick 67W charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 28.02.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Powerful hardware; nice cameras;; decent autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 26.02.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Trendy design; beautiful display; decent performance; good cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.02.2024
Kommentar
ARM Mali-G68 MP4: Integrierte Grafikkarte der Mittelklasse mit 4 Kernen / Clustern.
Einige nicht anspruchsvolle aktuelle Spiele können mit geringen Details noch flüssig gespielt werden. Für Office und Video natürlich ausreichende Leistungsreserven.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
Dimensity 7050: Der Dimensity 7050 ist ein Mittelklasse-Prozessor mit integriertem 5G Modem. Der CPU-Teil integriert zwei schnelle ARM Cortex-A78 Kerne mit bis zu 2,6 GHz und sechs Stromsparkerne vom Typ Cortex-A55 mit bis zu 2 GHz. Anscheinend ist der 7050 ein Rebrand des Dimensity 1080.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
6.70": Es handelt sich um ein kleines Display-Format für Smartphones. Man sollte nicht stark fehlsichtig sein und man wird wenig Details am Bildschirm sehen und nur eine kleine Auflösung zur Verfügung haben. Dafür sollte das Gerät klein und handlich sein, gut transportierbar.» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.
0.177 kg:
In diese Gewichtsklasse fallen die meisten Smartphones und nur vereinzelt Tablets. Nur wenige Smartphones sind schwerer und eher als Tablets anzusehen.
Oppo:
OPPO Electronics Corp. ist ein 2004 gegründeter chinesischer Elektronikhersteller, der hauptsächlich Smartphones, Blu-ray-Player, Audiogeräte, Power Banks und andere elektronische Produkte produziert. Es ist ein Tochterunternehmen von BBK Electronic Corporation, einem riesigen chinesischen Elektronikkonzern, zu dem auch Oppo,Vivo und Realme gehören. Der gemeinsame Weltmarkt-Anteil bei Smartphones ist dadurch sehr hoch.
76.08%: Weltbewegend ist diese Bewertung nicht. Diese Bewertung muss man eigentlich als unterdurchschnittlich ansehen, denn es gibt etwa ebenso mehr Geräte mit schlechtere Beurteilungen als Besseren. Eine Kaufempfehlung kann man nur mit viel Wohlwollen darin sehen, es sei denn es handelt sich um Websites, die generell streng urteilen.
» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.