Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G78 MP14 vs Qualcomm Adreno 650

ARM Mali-G78 MP14

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP14

Die ARM Mali-G78MP14 ist eine integrierte High-End-Grafikeinheit für ARM-SoCs, die erstmals Ende 2020 im Smartphone- und Tablet-Chip Samsung Exynos 2100 verbaut wurde (z.B. Galaxy S21 Serie). Die G78MP124 integriert 14 der 24 möglichen Kerne/Cluster und nutzt die 2. Generation der Valhall-Architektur. Im Vergleich zur G77 bietet die G78 zwei neue Features: Asynchronous Top Level und Fragment Dependency Tracking.

Die GPU zählt damit zu den schnellsten Grafikkarten für Android-Smartphones in 2020 und daher sollten alle aktuellen Spiele flüssig dargestellt werden.

An Grafik-APIs unterstützt die G78 OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 und OpenCL 2.0.

Qualcomm Adreno 650

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 650

Die Qualcomm Adreno 650 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 ARM-SoC, 865 Plus und 870 5G integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2020 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten High-End Geräten eingesetzt. Die GPU besitzt einen Basistakt von 250 MHz und je nach Modell eine Burst Frequency von 587 (SD865), 646 MHz (SD865+) bzw. 670 MHz (SD870) .

Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 650 GPU eine um 25% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 640 im Snapdragon 855. Dies wird durch +50% mehr ALUs und +50% mehr Takt der Pixelshader erreicht.

Die Performance in unseren ersten Benchmarks mit einem Referenzgerät von Qualcomm ist exzellent und kann sich an die Spitze aller GPUs für Android-Devices setzen. Die ARM Mali-G76 MP16 (z.B. Kirin 990) wird knapp abgehängt und im 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Test kann sich die Adreno 650 sogar an die Spitze setzen. In GFXBench ist nur die Apple A13 GPU schneller.

Dadurch eignet sich der Adreno 650 auch für alle anspruchsvollen 3D-Spiele unter Android. Eine Neuheit ist auch das der GPU-Treiber im Play-Store von Android verfügbar sein soll.

Über die GPU lassen sich Displays (max. 2) mit 4K-Auflösung bei 60 Hz bzw QHD+ mit 144 Hz ansteuern.

show full text
ARM Mali-G78 MP14Qualcomm Adreno 650
Adreno 600 Serie
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
CodenameValhall
ArchitekturValhallAdreno 600
Pipelines14 - unified
Shared Memoryneinja
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
Herstellungsprozess5 nm7 nm
Erscheinungsdatum26.05.2020 04.12.2019
Herstellerseitewww.arm.com
Kerntakt250 - 670 (Boost) MHz
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Adreno 650GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W? MHz670 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz646 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8658 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz587 MHz
min. - max.250 MHz587 - 670 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 88848     avg: 96343     median: 98950 (10%)     max: 101231 Points
min:      avg: 144018.4     median: 148305.5 (15%)     max: 180392 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 5873     avg: 5949.7     median: 5966 (3%)     max: 6010 Points
min: 3789     avg: 4167.9     median: 4230 (2%)     max: 5039 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1758 Points (2%)
min: 1103     avg: 1217.9     median: 1223 (1%)     max: 1246 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.7     avg: 9.9     median: 10 (4%)     max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 25     avg: 26.7     median: 27 (5%)     max: 28 fps
min: 18     avg: 21.1     median: 21 (4%)     max: 27 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 49     avg: 60.7     median: 64 (5%)     max: 69 fps
min: 27     avg: 55     median: 55 (4%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 42     avg: 54     median: 58 (7%)     max: 62 fps
min: 39     avg: 52.6     median: 51 (6%)     max: 62 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 74     avg: 88     median: 83 (6%)     max: 107 fps
min: 67     avg: 87.2     median: 88 (7%)     max: 103 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 117     avg: 140.3     median: 143 (8%)     max: 161 fps
min: 96     avg: 125.1     median: 125 (7%)     max: 151 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G78 MP14
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 137     avg: 177.7     median: 154 (4%)     max: 242 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 650
min: 168     avg: 209.5     median: 206 (5%)     max: 266 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
84.4 fps (2%)
min: 72.6     avg: 75.5     median: 75 (2%)     max: 78.57 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
2688 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
2532 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.18     avg: 8.2     median: 7.6 (3%)     max: 12.7 Watt
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 650:
60  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 650:
60  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
150%
Adreno 650:
60 119 ~ 90 fps
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
148%
Adreno 650:
60 117 ~ 89 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
148%
Adreno 650:
60 118 ~ 89 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
ultra
Adreno 650:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 650:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
100%
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G78 MP14:
59  fps
102%
Adreno 650:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP14:
102 111 ~ 107 fps
66%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 52 59 60 60 60 60 62 64 85 91 114 117 119 120 ~ 71 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G78 MP14:
60  fps
102%
Adreno 650:
40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 90 ~ 61 fps
med.
100%
Mali-G78 MP14:
40  fps
145%
Adreno 650:
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP14:
30 30 40 ~ 33 fps
161%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 30 30 39 40 40 40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 53 fps
ultra
Mali-G78 MP14:
0 (!)  fps
Adreno 650:
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 650:
60 60 62 ~ 61 fps
ultra
Adreno 650:
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 650:
60 60 90 105 142 144 ~ 100 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 650:
30 30 60 60 ~ 45 fps
high
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 58 60 60 60 ~ 41 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 650:
60 144 ~ 102 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP14 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 125%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 122%

Qualcomm Adreno 650lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal6060
League of Legends: Wild Rift908989
Call of Duty Mobile60
Genshin Impact6060
Armajet71
PUBG Mobile61585340
Arena of Valor6160
Dead Trigger 2100
Asphalt 9: Legends4541
Real Racing 3102
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
5

1


2
4

1
5






ARM Mali-G78 MP14lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift606060
Genshin Impact606059
Armajet107
PUBG Mobile604033
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3

1
1

1
2

1
1






Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
Errors [Close]

#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 9245> for benchmark 201, setting:1054 +0s ... 0.028s

#1 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 11492> for benchmark 201, setting:1054 +0s ... 0.029s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 13273> for benchmark 201, setting:1055 +0s ... 0.029s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 16809> for benchmark 201, setting:1055 +0s ... 0.03s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 8345> for benchmark 201, setting:1057 +0s ... 0.03s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 8975> for benchmark 201, setting:1057 +0s ... 0.031s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 10913> for benchmark 201, setting:1058 +0s ... 0.031s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 11999> for benchmark 201, setting:1058 +0s ... 0.032s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 8960> for benchmark 201, setting:897 +0s ... 0.032s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 10046> for benchmark 201, setting:897 +0s ... 0.033s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 13507> for benchmark 201, setting:915 +0s ... 0.033s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 14283> for benchmark 201, setting:915 +0s ... 0.033s

#12 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 7614> for benchmark 201, setting:898 +0s ... 0.034s

#13 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 7881> for benchmark 201, setting:898 +0s ... 0.034s

#14 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 9978> for benchmark 201, setting:917 +0s ... 0.035s

#15 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 9167> for benchmark 201, setting:917 +0s ... 0.035s

#16 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 277129> for benchmark 833, setting:2453 +0s ... 0.046s

#17 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 276746> for benchmark 833, setting:2453 +0s ... 0.047s

#18 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 54110> for benchmark 200, setting:597 +0s ... 0.049s

#19 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 42627> for benchmark 200, setting:598 +0s ... 0.05s

log 13. 05:16:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10649 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9971 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731471408s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10649 +0.01s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 10649 +0.006s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9971 +0s ... 0.021s

#11 got single benchmarks 9971 +0.004s ... 0.025s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.026s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.028s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.028s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.029s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.029s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.03s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.03s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.031s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.031s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.032s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.032s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.033s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.033s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.033s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.034s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.034s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.035s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.035s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.036s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.037s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.038s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.039s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.04s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.04s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.041s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.041s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.042s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.042s

#41 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.043s

#42 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.043s

#43 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.044s

#44 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.044s

#45 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.045s

#46 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.045s

#47 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.046s

#48 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.046s

#49 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.047s

#50 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.047s

#51 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.048s

#52 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.048s

#53 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.049s

#54 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.049s

#55 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.05s

#56 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.05s

#57 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.051s

#58 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.051s

#59 Got 203 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.074s

#60 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.074s

#61 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.075s

#62 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.078s

#63 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.078s

#64 return log +0.002s ... 0.08s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)