Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU vs NVIDIA T1000

Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

Die Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU ist eine von Apple selbst designte Grafikkarte im Apple M2 Pro 10-Kern SoC und laut Apple mit 16 der 19 Kernen aktiviert (aktuell im Einstiegs-MacBook Pro 14 verbaut). Die GPU hat keinen dedizierten Grafikspeicher aber kann auf den schnellen gemeinsamen LPDDR5-6400? Speicher (unified Memory, 16 oder 32 GB) zugreifen.

Laut Apple soll die 19-Kern-Variante GPU 30% schneller sein als die alte 16-Kern GPU im M1 Pro sein. Daher sollte die 16-Kern-Variante ebenfalls schneller sein als die 16-Kern GPU im M1 Pro (aber nur minimal) und natürlich den direkten Vorgänger mit 14-Kernen deutlich abhängen.

Neu ist beim M2 Pro der Support für HDMI 2.1 (8K Displays).

Die iGPU unterstützt Apple's Metal 2 Schnittstelle und dürfte eine ähnliche Architektur wie die älteren PowerVR Grafikeinheiten (z.B. im Apple A10) aufweisen.

Da der SoC im 5nm Prozess bei TSMC hergestellt wird, sollte die Energieeffizienz hervorragend sein.

Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPUNVIDIA T1000
Quadro Turing Serie
M2 Max 38-Core GPU compare 38
M2 Max 30-Core GPU compare 30
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU compare 19 @ 0.44 - 1.4 GHz
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU 16
M2 10-Core GPU compare 10 @ 1.4 GHz
M2 8-Core GPU compare 8 @ 1.4 GHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Pipelines16 - unified
SpeichertypLPDDR5-6400
Shared Memoryneinnein
Herstellungsprozess5 nm
Notebookgrößemittel (15.4" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum17.01.2023
CPU in M2 Pro 16-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core10 x 2424 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T1000
3.7 pt (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
100%
1 T1000 +
3534 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
3088 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
398761 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
179865 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
100%
1 T1000 +
37881 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
50553 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
100%
1 T1000 +
8124 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
8450 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
237130 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
11224 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
100%
1 T1000 +
34584 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
100%
1 T1000 +
41157 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
100%
1 T1000 +
12953 Points (18%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
11793 Points (10%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
100%
1 T1000 +
46318 Points (13%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
100%
1 T1000 +
39668 Points (22%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T1000 +
78565 Points (86%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark 06
100%
1 T1000 +
58968 Points (77%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
100%
1 T1000 +
42.2 fps (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (59%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom METAL *
132 Seconds (14%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
39.3 fps (28%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
18.1 fps (12%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
78.1 fps (38%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
37.3 fps (23%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
44 fps (14%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
13.4 fps (13%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
62.8 fps (10%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
9.5 fps (2%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
43.3 fps (21%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
21.9 fps (14%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
27.4 fps (11%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
100%
1 T1000 +
6837 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 T1000 +
252.5 fps (83%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
141.9 fps (8%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
335.8 fps (20%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
78.7 fps (32%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
181.1 fps (33%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
493 fps (37%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
389 fps (44%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
659 fps (14%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
1011 fps (59%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
1815 fps (14%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
100%
1 T1000 +
386 fps (2%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
100%
1 T1000 +
31.9 fps (7%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
100%
1 T1000 +
38611 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
100%
1 T1000 +
36031 Points (10%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
1987 Samples/s (9%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
4129 Samples/s (7%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
100%
1 T1000 +
6369 Points (7%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
101.9 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
47.8 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
46.6 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
1 fps per Watt (87%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.9 fps per Watt (78%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
156.8 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Power Efficiency
100%
1 T1000 +
min: 0.07462     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (18%)     max: 0.4205 fps per Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T1000 → 168% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
T1000:
98.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
82.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
58.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
22  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
19  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
15  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
10  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
138.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
90.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
50.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
39.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
44  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
38  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
45.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
34.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
28.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
23.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
45  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
35.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
30.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
29.5  fps
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
T1000:
108.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
96.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
63.6  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
69.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
55.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
35.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
27.6  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
125.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
91.3  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
69.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
49.7  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
51.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
42.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
33.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
21.4  fps
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
T1000:
110.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
56.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
47.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
40.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
80.8  fps
187%
T1000:
151  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
52  fps
115%
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
38  fps
101%
T1000:
38.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
28.9  fps
99%
T1000:
28.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
258  fps
76%
T1000:
195.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
75  fps
80%
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
48  fps
78%
T1000:
37.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
36  fps
67%
T1000:
24.1  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
22  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
117  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
58  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
53  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
102.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
33  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
26.1  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
159  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
72  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
65  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
57  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
36  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
T1000:
226  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
87.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
69.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
59.9  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
T1000:
127  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
57  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
53  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
211  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
145.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
130.1  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
101.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
49.3  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
36.2  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
246.2  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
217.7  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
150.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
136.5  fps
low 1024x768
T1000:
188.8  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
113.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
51  fps
125%
T1000:
63.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
45  fps
78%
T1000:
35.2  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
76  fps
247%
T1000:
187.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
73  fps
256%
T1000:
187.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
46  fps
225%
T1000:
103.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
50.2  fps

Average Gaming Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA T1000 → 133%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 96%

NVIDIA T1000lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2498.482.658.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora22191510
Total War Pharaoh138.690.850.639.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage444038
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty45.134.228.323.8
Baldur's Gate 34535.230.229.5
F1 23108.396.563.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands69.255.635.327.6
GRID Legends125.491.369.649.7
God of War51.842.533.521.4
Far Cry 6110.456.947.440.3
Borderlands 31516038.228.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms195.96037.324.1
Far Cry New Dawn117625853
Metro Exodus102.345.93326.1
Strange Brigade22687.269.459.9
Far Cry 5127625753
X-Plane 11.11211145.8130.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark101.349.336.2
Dota 2 Reborn246.2217.7150.4136.5
The Witcher 3188.8113.863.935.2
GTA V187.4187.1103.550.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4
7
10
1
8
10
3
2
13
5
2
8
8

1






Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Borderlands 380.8523828.9
Total War: Three Kingdoms25875483622
Shadow of the Tomb Raider15972655736
The Witcher 35145
GTA V767346
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


2
2

1
3

4
1
1
3

1
1




Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 20. 00:21:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11570 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12782 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726784466s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:16:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11570 +0.01s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 11570 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12782 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#11 got single benchmarks 12782 +0s ... 0.022s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.043s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.043s

#15 Got 102 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.049s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.049s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.05s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.008s ... 0.058s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.058s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.06s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)