Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU vs NVIDIA T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)

Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

Die Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU ist eine von Apple selbst designte Grafikkarte im Apple M2 Pro 10-Kern SoC und laut Apple mit 16 der 19 Kernen aktiviert (aktuell im Einstiegs-MacBook Pro 14 verbaut). Die GPU hat keinen dedizierten Grafikspeicher aber kann auf den schnellen gemeinsamen LPDDR5-6400? Speicher (unified Memory, 16 oder 32 GB) zugreifen.

Laut Apple soll die 19-Kern-Variante GPU 30% schneller sein als die alte 16-Kern GPU im M1 Pro sein. Daher sollte die 16-Kern-Variante ebenfalls schneller sein als die 16-Kern GPU im M1 Pro (aber nur minimal) und natürlich den direkten Vorgänger mit 14-Kernen deutlich abhängen.

Neu ist beim M2 Pro der Support für HDMI 2.1 (8K Displays).

Die iGPU unterstützt Apple's Metal 2 Schnittstelle und dürfte eine ähnliche Architektur wie die älteren PowerVR Grafikeinheiten (z.B. im Apple A10) aufweisen.

Da der SoC im 5nm Prozess bei TSMC hergestellt wird, sollte die Energieeffizienz hervorragend sein.

NVIDIA T1000

► remove from comparison

Die Nvidia T1000 Desktop ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für kleine Workstations der Einstiegsklasse. Sie basiert auf dem selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GeForce GTX1650. Auch die Anzahl der Shadereinheiten ist mit 896 identisch. Mit 8-GB-VRAM bietet die Nvidia T1000 mehr VRAM, welcher weiterhin über ein 128 Bit Speicherbus angebunden ist. Die Leistungsaufnahme der Nvidia T1000 beträgt nur 50 Watt und kommt daher ohne einen zusätzlichen Stromanschluss aus.

Die professionellen Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)

► remove from comparison

Die Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000 für Laptops ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für große und schwere Notebooks. Sie basiert auf den selben Chip wie die Consumer GeForce RTX 2070 jedoch mit zertifizierten Treibern für professionelle Anwendungen, weniger Kernen und geringeren Taktraten und langsameren, aber größerem Grafikspeicher.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

VarianteShaderTGP (W)Base (MHz)Boost (MHz)
Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop230416010051545
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile1920809451380
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q1920708701380
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2304657651305
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q2304606001215
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile2304115?12151440

Features

Der TU106-Chip wird in 12nm gefertigt und bietet eine Reihe neuer Features, wie DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) und Real Time Ray Tracing. Dadurch lassen sich vor allem Beleuchtungseffekte sehr viel realistischer darstellen. Weiterhin gibt es Support für DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) sowie H.265 Video De- und Encoding (PlayReady 3.0). 

Performance

Die theoretische Performance sollte leicht unterhalb einer GeForce RTX 2070 liegen. Bei manchen professionellen Applikationen verhelfen die Quadro Treiber der RTX 3000 jedoch zu einer höheren Performance.

Mit einem TDP von 80 Watt benötigt die Quadro RTX 3000 zwar deutlich weniger als die stärkeren RTX 4000 und 5000 GPUs, jedoch eignet sie sich trotzdem nur für große Workstation Laptops.

Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPUNVIDIA T1000NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
Quadro Turing Serie
M2 Max 38-Core GPU 38
M2 Max 30-Core GPU 30
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU 19 @ 0.44 - 1.4 GHz
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU 16
M2 10-Core GPU 10 @ 1.4 GHz
M2 8-Core GPU 8 @ 1.4 GHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Pipelines16 - unified896 - unified1920 - unified
SpeichertypLPDDR5-6400GDDR6GDDR6
Shared Memoryneinneinnein
Herstellungsprozess5 nm12 nm12 nm
Notebookgrößemittel (15.4" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum17.01.2023 06.05.2021 27.05.2019
ArchitekturTuringTuring
TMUs56
ROPs32
Kerntakt1065 - 1395 (Boost) MHz945 - 1380 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance5000 TFLOPS FP16, 2500 TFLOPS FP32, 0.7812 TFLOPS FP64
Speichertakt10000 effective = 1250 MHz14000 MHz
Speicherbandbreite128 Bit192 Bit
Max. Speichergröße8 GB6 GB
Memory Bandwidth160 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 6.8, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Stromverbrauch50 Watt80 Watt
Transistors4.7 Billion10.8 Billion
Die Size 200 mm²
PCIe3.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 1.4a
CodenameN19E-Q1
FeaturesDLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
CPU in M2 Pro 16-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core10 x 2424 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T1000
3.7 pt (11%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
6.6 pt (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
100%
1 T1000 +
3534 Points (10%)
min: 5566     avg: 5856     median: 5923 (17%)     max: 6080 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
3088 Points (8%)
min: 5503     avg: 5702     median: 5589 (15%)     max: 6014 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
398761 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
179865 Points (21%)
140064 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
100%
1 T1000 +
37881 Points (36%)
min: 32163     avg: 35433     median: 36407 (34%)     max: 37729 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
50553 Points (12%)
min: 62730     avg: 86865     median: 91394 (22%)     max: 106470 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
100%
1 T1000 +
8124 Points (14%)
min: 12693     avg: 13568     median: 13570 (23%)     max: 14442 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
8450 Points (10%)
min: 13802     avg: 14842     median: 14841.5 (17%)     max: 15881 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
237130 Points (26%)
123598 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
11224 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
100%
1 T1000 +
34584 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
100%
1 T1000 +
41157 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
100%
1 T1000 +
12953 Points (17%)
min: 15944     avg: 17495     median: 17864 (23%)     max: 18307 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
11793 Points (10%)
min: 17569     avg: 19467     median: 19878.5 (17%)     max: 20542 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
100%
1 T1000 +
46318 Points (13%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
50309 Points (15%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
100%
1 T1000 +
39668 Points (22%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
54830 Points (30%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T1000 +
78565 Points (86%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark 06
100%
1 T1000 +
58968 Points (77%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
37304 Points (49%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
100%
1 T1000 +
42.2 fps (13%)
58.3 fps (18%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
199.4 fps (37%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (59%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom METAL *
132 Seconds (14%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 107     avg: 112.1     median: 110.6 (27%)     max: 120.2 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 99.6     avg: 112.7     median: 113.5 (17%)     max: 124.3 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 76.9     avg: 81     median: 82 (18%)     max: 83.2 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 43.01     avg: 46     median: 46 (12%)     max: 49 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 72.4     avg: 78.2     median: 73.8 (20%)     max: 92.9 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 11.54     avg: 11.8     median: 11.8 (11%)     max: 12.13 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 113.6     avg: 118.2     median: 119.1 (48%)     max: 121 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 108.8     avg: 117.5     median: 115.5 (19%)     max: 130 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 151     avg: 157.3     median: 158 (28%)     max: 163 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 109.6     avg: 120.2     median: 121.6 (33%)     max: 128 fps
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 160.6     avg: 204.3     median: 215.5 (24%)     max: 225.4 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 73.3     avg: 79.3     median: 80.8 (18%)     max: 82.5 fps
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 53.9     avg: 59.8     median: 59.8 (12%)     max: 65.6 fps
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 155.4     avg: 182.3     median: 189.5 (22%)     max: 194.7 fps
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 25.76     avg: 28.2     median: 28.2 (9%)     max: 30.55 fps
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 160.6     avg: 182.5     median: 186.5 (27%)     max: 196.2 fps
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 185.8     avg: 199     median: 202.5 (23%)     max: 205.2 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 149.4     avg: 156.7     median: 157.5 (27%)     max: 162.5 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
39.3 fps (26%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
18.1 fps (12%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
78.1 fps (38%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
37.3 fps (23%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
44 fps (14%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
13.4 fps (13%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
62.8 fps (10%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
9.5 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
43.3 fps (21%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
21.9 fps (14%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
27.4 fps (11%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
100%
1 T1000 +
6837 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
6821 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 T1000 +
252.5 fps (83%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
129.2 fps (43%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
141.9 fps (8%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
335.8 fps (20%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 192.4     avg: 203.6     median: 204 (12%)     max: 214 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 99.6     avg: 99.8     median: 99.8 (100%)     max: 100 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
78.7 fps (32%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
181.1 fps (33%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
493 fps (37%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
389 fps (44%)
257.8 fps (29%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
659 fps (14%)
384.8 fps (8%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
1011 fps (59%)
407.8 fps (24%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
1815 fps (14%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
1010 fps (8%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
100%
1 T1000 +
386 fps (2%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
100%
1 T1000 +
31.9 fps (7%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
100%
1 T1000 +
38611 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
100%
1 T1000 +
36031 Points (10%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
1987 Samples/s (7%)
2754 Samples/s (10%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
4129 Samples/s (7%)
5769 Samples/s (10%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
100%
1 T1000 +
6369 Points (7%)
8716 Points (9%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
101.9 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
47.8 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
46.6 Watt (10%)
min: 135.5     avg: 143.8     median: 143 (31%)     max: 153 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
1 fps per Watt (87%)
min: 0.3523     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (36%)     max: 0.4354 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.9 fps per Watt (78%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
156.8 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Power Efficiency
100%
1 T1000 +
0.1 fps per Watt (11%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 30.7     avg: 38.9     median: 41.2 (66%)     max: 44.7 dB(A)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T1000 → 168% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) → 122% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
T1000:
98.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
82.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
58.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
22  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
19  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
15  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
10  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
138.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
90.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
50.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
39.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
44  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
38  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
45.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
34.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
28.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
23.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
45  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
35.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
30.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
29.5  fps
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
T1000:
108.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
96.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
63.6  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
69.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
55.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
35.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
27.6  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
125.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
91.3  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
69.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
49.7  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
51.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
42.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
33.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
21.4  fps
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
T1000:
110.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
56.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
47.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
40.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
80.8  fps
187%
T1000:
151  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
52  fps
115%
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
38  fps
101%
T1000:
38.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
28.9  fps
99%
T1000:
28.6  fps
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
102  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
92  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
84  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
73  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
258  fps
76%
T1000:
195.9  fps
88%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
226.5  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
75  fps
80%
T1000:
60  fps
144%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
107.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
48  fps
78%
T1000:
37.3  fps
144%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
69.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
36  fps
67%
T1000:
24.1  fps
128%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
46  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
22  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
117  fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
114  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
62  fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
91  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
58  fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
86  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
53  fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
77  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
102.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
33  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
26.1  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
96  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
77  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
62  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
39  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
159  fps
85%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
135  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
72  fps
139%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
100  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
65  fps
135%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
88  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
57  fps
139%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
79  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
36  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
T1000:
226  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
87.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
69.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
59.9  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
T1000:
127  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
57  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
53  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
211  fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
114  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
145.8  fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
102  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
130.1  fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
86  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
101.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
49.3  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
36.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
219.1  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
213.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
174.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
99.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
83  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
246.2  fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
142  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
217.7  fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
130  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
150.4  fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
132  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
136.5  fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
121  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
88  fps
low 1024x768
T1000:
188.8  fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
274.9 303.2 ~ 289 fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
113.8  fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
182.7 202.8 ~ 193 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
51  fps
125%
T1000:
63.9  fps
214%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
101.3 117 ~ 109 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
45  fps
78%
T1000:
35.2  fps
124%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
53.9 59 ~ 56 fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
76  fps
247%
T1000:
187.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
73  fps
256%
T1000:
187.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
46  fps
225%
T1000:
103.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
50.2  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
325.9 349.5 ~ 338 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
288.2 294.1 ~ 291 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
266.8 275.2 ~ 271 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
140.3 148.4 ~ 144 fps

Average Gaming Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA T1000 → 133%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 96%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) → 134%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 132%

NVIDIA T1000lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2498.482.658.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora22191510
Total War Pharaoh138.690.850.639.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage444038
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty45.134.228.323.8
Baldur's Gate 34535.230.229.5
F1 23108.396.563.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands69.255.635.327.6
GRID Legends125.491.369.649.7
God of War51.842.533.521.4
Far Cry 6110.456.947.440.3
Borderlands 31516038.228.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms195.96037.324.1
Far Cry New Dawn117625853
Metro Exodus102.345.93326.1
Strange Brigade22687.269.459.9
Far Cry 5127625753
X-Plane 11.11211145.8130.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark101.349.336.2
Dota 2 Reborn246.2217.7150.4136.5
The Witcher 3188.8113.863.935.2
GTA V187.4187.1103.550.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4
7
10
1
8
10
3
2
13
5
2
8
8

1






Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Borderlands 380.8523828.9
Total War: Three Kingdoms25875483622
Shadow of the Tomb Raider15972655736
The Witcher 35145
GTA V767346
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


2
2

1
3

4
1
1
3

1
1




NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2019102928473
Total War: Three Kingdoms226.5107.769.246
Far Cry New Dawn114918677
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey96776239
Shadow of the Tomb Raider1351008879
X-Plane 11.1111410286
Rocket League219.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider213.9174.699.483
Dota 2 Reborn14213013212188
The Witcher 328919310956
BioShock Infinite338291271144
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4
6


6
4


8
3

3
4
2





1

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

v1.28
log 10. 04:37:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11570 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12782 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9854 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731209833s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11570 +0.019s ... 0.024s

#10 got single benchmarks 11570 +0s ... 0.025s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12782 +0.004s ... 0.028s

#12 got single benchmarks 12782 +0.005s ... 0.033s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9854 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#14 got single benchmarks 9854 +0.006s ... 0.043s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.084s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.084s

#18 Got 151 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.093s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.093s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.094s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.009s ... 0.103s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.103s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.103s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)