Notebookcheck Logo

Loongson 2F 900MHz vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs unknown

Loongson 2F 900MHz

► remove from comparison

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

unknown

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelLoongson 2F 900MHzWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950unknown
Series
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz « 0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown «  cores
Clock900 MHz1000 MHz
L2 Cache512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
TDP4 Watt
ArchitectureMIPSARMx86
Announced
CodenameCortex-A9
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.tw

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
5778 Points (68%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1343 Points (34%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
4370 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1006 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
3951 Points (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
min: 836.4     avg: 10153     median: 14670 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 13727     median: 2773.5 (2%)     max: 46687 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 unknown +
160 Points (45%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 unknown +
200 Points (37%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
714538 Points (43%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 unknown +
197906 Points (54%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 unknown +
13858 Points (58%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 unknown +
1028 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 unknown +
9.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 unknown +
5.5 Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks unknown → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 16. 20:47:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 480 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731786448s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.057s ... 0.057s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.057s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 480 +0.001s ... 0.057s

#9 got single benchmarks 480 +0.004s ... 0.061s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.062s

#11 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.004s ... 0.066s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.067s

#13 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.116s ... 0.183s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.183s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.194s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.196s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.196s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)