Notebookcheck Logo

Huawei Kirin A1 vs Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz

Huawei Kirin A1

Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz

show full text
ModelHuawei Kirin A1Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz
SeriesHuawei
CodenameARM Cortex-M7
Clock200 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Serie:
Google Tensor G4 compare1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
Technology55 nm
FeaturesVivante GC800, DDR1-3 memory controller, hardware video en- and decoder
iGPUVivante GC800

Benchmarks

Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
14.3 MFLOPS (1%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
1249 points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 08. 21:53:05

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12639 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3317 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731099185s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.053s ... 0.053s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12639 +0.001s ... 0.053s

#8 got single benchmarks 12639 +0.004s ... 0.058s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3317 +0.001s ... 0.058s

#10 got single benchmarks 3317 +0.003s ... 0.061s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.062s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.065s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)