Notebookcheck Logo

Huawei Kirin A1 vs Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz vs ARM Cortex-M4

Huawei Kirin A1

► remove from comparison

Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison

ARM Cortex-M4

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelHuawei Kirin A1Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHzARM Cortex-M4
SeriesHuawei
CodenameARM Cortex-M7
Clock200 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 «  cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Technology55 nm
FeaturesVivante GC800, DDR1-3 memory controller, hardware video en- and decoder
iGPUVivante GC800

Benchmarks

Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
14.3 MFLOPS (1%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
1249 points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 09. 03:05:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12639 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3317 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13222 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731117919s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.026s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12639 +0.001s ... 0.027s

#9 got single benchmarks 12639 +0.004s ... 0.031s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3317 +0s ... 0.031s

#11 got single benchmarks 3317 +0s ... 0.031s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13222 +0.001s ... 0.032s

#13 got single benchmarks 13222 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.035s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.035s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)