Honor X7b
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 4 Bewertungen (aus 27 Tests)
Testberichte für das Honor X7b
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE
Alright, so we already know the HONOR X7b is priced at PHP 8,999 for its only configuration at 8 + 8GB of memory and 256GB of storage. So the question remains, how far did the PHP 9,000 go? –Well the HONOR X7b offers exceptional value for budget-conscious consumers. It gets an impressive battery life, an IPS display with good contrast, and a usable camera system. It stands out as a compelling choice in the entry-level segment. Whether for just the phone essentials, video or music consumption, or casual photography. The HONOR X7b delivers a satisfying experience without breaking the bank.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.04.2024
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
Given my experience, the X7b from Honor isn’t a bad phone by any means. It has a charming back, clicks decent photos under the sun, and gives me peace of mind in the battery department. Having said that, its value propositions just fall short of the competition at the moment. The Redmi Note 13 (review) from Xiaomi is the X7b’s greatest competitor both in terms of specs and pricing and offers a better overall value in my opinion. Starting off with similarities, you are going to get about the same raw performance on both devices with their Snapdragon chips but Redmi’s 120Hz refresh rate is just going to make everything feel smoother. And since it’s AMOLED, the display contrast, colors, and viewing experience are going to be better on the Note as well. Its stereo speakers also sound a bit more balanced and you are getting a slightly better ultrawide too.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Speed Magazine EN→DE
The HONOR X7b is an attractive and reliable daily driver, thanks to its good display, decent performance, and slim build. While its camera and audio systems can be further improved, its powerful 6000mAh battery is one thing you can rely on if you’re only looking for a device to get you through your everyday tasks. This phone is worth considering, especially with its budget-friendly price of P8,999.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.03.2024
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
The HONOR X7b is a big improvement over previous X7 models thanks to a higher-resolution main camera and an updated display with a modern punch-hole and a Full HD+ resolution. While the processor is not an upgrade, the X7b shines with its excellent battery life, making it one of the longest-lasting budget phones in the Philippines for 2024.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.03.2024
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
The Honor X7b has some of the most balanced internal components we have ever seen in a smartphone. It is also crafted beautifully that complement what’s there internally. However, the smartphone lacks 5G connectivity, which can be a deal breaker for many users. Honor explains that it was an intentional decision to keep the costs down. But the cost of the Honor X7b is not that cheap either. At that cost, there are other smartphones in the market that more or less provide a similar design and specs while also providing 5G. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 is an exceptional example of this. It not only provides 5G but also provides far better specs for around the same price tag or even lower. However, the global availability of Redmi Note 13 can be a bit problematic as the smartphone often goes out of stock, which is not the case with the Honor X7b. However, the final decision is up to you, so it is better to choose a smartphone based on your needs and requirements.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.01.2024
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Honor X7b demonstrated an outstanding battery experience in our tests, reaching a global score of 151. It outperformed its predecessor, the Honor X7a, with improved autonomy and charging performances. The Honor X7b is equipped with a high-capacity battery of 6000 mAh, which lasted almost four days (95 hours) when used moderately. The device was well-optimized for each use case thanks to its very low discharging current. Its impressive endurance in each individually tested case earned the device the top spot in autonomy in our database. For example, in the home/office autonomy test, the Honor X7b’s battery lasted for five days, the longest we have recorded so far. The Honor X7b’s 35W charger is relatively modest for a 6000 mAh battery. It took the device more than 2 hours and 30 minutes to fully replenish the battery, placing it in the bottom half of our database.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.12.2023
Quelle: Tech Nave EN→DE
Overall, it's a very decent device for your daily needs. However, for a device in this price range, we feel some phones could perform better and provide you with more value. For example, the Infinix GT 10 Pro (RM1049) might cost slightly more compared to the HONOR X7b (RM799), but it gives you better performance and overall user experience. Another solid alternative is the iQOO Z7x 5G (RM929). If you are looking for a smartphone with excellent battery life, solid fast charging tech, and decent performance, the X7b model should be on top of your wish list.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.12.2023
Quelle: Unite4buy PL→DE
Positive: Big screen; nice display; powerful hardware; large battery capacity; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.12.2023
Quelle: 3DNews.ru RU→DE
Positive: Large screen; modern design; large battery capacity; fast charging; nice main camera; memory card slot; mini jack; stereo speakers. Negative: Mediocre hardware; poor cameras; heavy and bulky.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.02.2024
Quelle: MobilArena HU HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.02.2024
Bewertung: Preis: 50% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; powerful processor; large battery capacity; affordable price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.05.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great display; nice dual cameras; high performance; impressive battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; good cameras; decent autonomy; high performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; big screen; great display; high performance; long battery life; decent cameras
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.04.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; big screen; nice triple cameras; powerful hardware; impressive performance; high autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.04.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; long battery life; nice performance; modern design; great cameras; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.04.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; modern design; high performance; impressive cameras; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Powerful processor; high performance; very long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.03.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Stylish design; big screen; nice cameras; impressive autonomy; high performance; decent processor; 6GB RAM; large storage.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.03.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Trendy design; big screen; nice dual speakers; great cameras; powerful processor; high performance; impressive battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.03.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; impressive autonomy; powerful processor; high performance; nice cameras; large storage; trendy design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.03.2024
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; beautiful display; powerful processor; high performance; large battery capacity; nice cameras; trendy design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.03.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; decent performance; long battery life; great cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.03.2024
Quelle: Unlimited Tech →DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.01.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Kommentar
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SoC. Die Performance ist vergleichbar mit dem alten Adreno 512 und daher in der unteren Mittelklasse.
Diese Karten können nur sehr alte und sehr anspruchslose 3D Spiele flüssig darstellen. Anwendungen wie Office, Internet surfen, Bildbearbeitung oder (SD) Videoschnitt sind jedoch ohne große Einschränkungen möglich.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
SD 680: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo 265 Kernen (vier ARM Cortex-A73 basierte Kerne mit bis zu 2,4 GHz und 4 ARM Cortex-A53 mit bis zu 1,8 GHz) und einem X11 LTE Modem. » Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
6.80": Es handelt sich um ein kleines Display-Format für Smartphones. Man sollte nicht stark fehlsichtig sein und man wird wenig Details am Bildschirm sehen und nur eine kleine Auflösung zur Verfügung haben. Dafür sollte das Gerät klein und handlich sein, gut transportierbar.» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.
0.199 kg:
In diese Gewichtsklasse fallen die meisten Smartphones und nur vereinzelt Tablets. Nur wenige Smartphones sind schwerer und eher als Tablets anzusehen.
Honor: 2014 gründete Huawei die Tochtermarke Honor unter der bestimmte Smartphone-Linien vertrieben werden. Gelegentlich werden die Produkte auch unter der Bezeichnung Huawei Honor geführt.
Der Marktanteil von Honor-Produkten ist überschaubar, aber es gibt einige Testberichte für Honor Smartphones mit durchschnittliche Bewertungen (2016).
83.25%: Diese Bewertung ist leicht überdurchschnittlich, es gibt etwas mehr Geräte mit schlechteren Beurteilungen. Klare Kaufempfehlungen sehen aber anders aus.
» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.