Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.45)
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 32 Bewertungen (aus 52 Tests)
Testberichte für das Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Das Honor Magic5 Lite 5G macht vieles besser als sein Vorgänger, setzt aber weiterhin auf das gleiche SoC, welches in dieser Preisklasse aber immer noch sehr geläufig ist. Äußerlich kann es mit seiner schlanken Bauform überzeugen, in welcher dennoch ein großer 5.100-mAh-Akku Platz findet.
Quelle: Chinahandys.net
Das Honor Magic 5 Lite repräsentiert das Sprichwort “Keine Rose ohne Dornen” wie kaum ein anderes Gerät. Man bekommt hier ein astreines Design mit einem nahezu perfekten Display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.03.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Inside Handy
Insgesamt überzeugt hat uns beim Honor Magic5 Lite vor allem das Gehäuse und das Display. Wer eine hochwertige Verarbeitung und einen großen Bildschirm mit satten Farben zu schätzen weiß, wird hiermit sicher glücklich.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.03.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Root Nation EN→DE
So, what is the HONOR Magic5 Lite? It’s quite an interesting representative of a mid-range smartphone with its strengths and compromises. What I would like to praise the device for is a wonderful curved AMOLED screen with a refresh rate of 120 Hz, a nice and elegant design (I personally liked the color), pleasant performance for most tasks, a sharp interface, a good main camera module and, of course, a great battery life. From the minuses – we have here a rather weak monaural sound (not in volume, but in quality) and mediocre additional cameras and front camera. If this is not critical for you, HONOR Magic5 Lite will be a pretty good purchase with a nice balance between price and features. For what we definitely want to praise the device, so it is a wonderful curved AMOLED-screen with a refresh rate of 120 Hz, nice and elegant design (I was personally won over by the color), pleasant for most tasks performance, lively interface, not bad main camera module and excellent battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 100% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
Despite some notable letdowns in the camera, software, and performance departments, the Magic 5 Lite is a solid budget Android smartphone. What it lacks in secondary cameras, the device makes up for with an impressive display. Bloated and old software alongside a stuttery chipset are largely forgotten thanks to a battery that just keeps going. The trade-offs here are worth it, in my opinion. It might not be flagship-standard but the budget device packs in plenty of features for its £250 price tag. It outperforms more expensive mid-range options in the areas that really count. And all of that is enclosed in a good-looking, reliable design. There’s not much more you could ask for. The Magic 5 Lite certainly won’t disappoint, and I have no qualms recommending it to the budget-focused consumer.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.06.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Honor Magic5 Lite 5G is the basic model in the Magic5 series. The Magic5 Lite’s rear camera delivered a decent performance in good lighting conditions in both photos and videos, with good exposure and relatively natural colors. But the camera lacked good zoom capabilities. It also suffered from occasional focus instabilities. When taking videos, autofocus was fast, but video stabilization was not very efficient. Overall, the Magic5 Lite’s camera is very capable of taking nice landscape photos that contain good details.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.03.2023
Quelle: Gadgetspeak EN→DE
This is the latest offering to cross my desk; it is a SmartPhone that takes the screen right to the edge of the display. Like most recent quality SmartPhones it is all about the cameras and here they are amazingly good. The rest of the phone is also rather nice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 08.03.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 80% Leistung: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
The Honor Magic 5 Lite isn’t just a good-looking mid-range smartphone, as it’s also sporting key specs including a 6.67-inch 120Hz AMOLED display, a 64MP main snapper and a 5,100mAh battery that’s larger than most flagships. It could be a tempting option for those on a budget, and I look forward to delving in deeper for my full review.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.03.2023
Quelle: Tech Spurt
Unboxing the Honor Magic 5 Lite mid-range smartphone with a hands-on review of the camera tech, gaming performance, battery, specs and more! The budget-friendly Honor Magic 5 Lite is released in the UK, asking price £350. This affordable smartphone runs Magic UI 6.1 on top of older Android 12, while the Snapdragon 695 offers limited power. However, on the flip side the Honor Magic 5 Lite serves up impressive battery life and the camera is decent as long as it's not too dark. That AMOLED screen is a stunner, pumping crisp, high-contrast visuals at your face. And the Honor Magic 5 Lite is one of the prettiest mid-range phones of 2023 so far, with a best-in-class design. So are you tempted by this handset? Check out my unboxing and review of other favourite budget-friendly smartphones, including the Nothing Phone, Pixel 6a and OnePlus Nord blowers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.02.2023
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
Honor’s affordable mid-ranger is one of the most attractive phones in its class, with a flagship-esque look and feel. Its OLED display and epic battery life are also praiseworthy. Performance and camera output is merely ordinary, however, and the lack of a bundled charging brick feels like a bit of an oversight.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
After going through each of the sections, the Honor Magic 5 Lite is looking a great deal as it offers a beautiful viewing experience, incredible camera quality, and long-lasting battery life. But, we can’t overclock the flaws of mediocre video recording, standard charger, low performance, and less attractive GPU support. Overall, the phone will provide a good amount of features if you are not concerned with the performance. But we won’t be denying that is also a robust smartphone that is priced the same and gives better perks. If we have to choose an alternative option for this phone, the Xiaomi Redmi K60 would be a more appealing option, as it provides more diverse features and remarkable performance. Anyway, it’s your decision so to choose the phone according to your requirements.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.02.2023
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
After going through each of the sections, the Honor Magic 5 Lite is looking a great deal as it offers a beautiful viewing experience, incredible camera quality, and long-lasting battery life. But, we can’t overclock the flaws of mediocre video recording, standard charger, low performance, and less attractive GPU support. Overall, the phone will provide a good amount of features if you are not concerned with the performance. But we won’t be denying that is also a robust smartphone that is priced the same and gives better perks. If we have to choose an alternative option for this phone, the Xiaomi Redmi K60 would be a more appealing option, as it provides more diverse features and remarkable performance. Anyway, it’s your decision so to choose the phone according to your requirements.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.02.2023
Quelle: Make Use Of EN→DE
So, on to my recommendation. Do I recommend the Honor Magic5 Lite? Yes, I certainly do. At this price point, the phone is a pitch-perfect performer. It is snappy in operation, looks really nice, and the screen is brilliant. I can't imagine anyone looking for a phone in this price bracket having anything to complain about if they plump for the Magic5 Lite, and this honestly makes me more excited to see what the Pro version is made of.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
The new Magic5 Lite fixed only some of the Magic4 Lite's shortcomings from last year, with the display being the most significant upgrade. It's a rare flagship-grade OLED in this price range, but it's just not enough to persuade us. Pretty much all of the Magic5 Lite's competitors offer a similar display quality while being better in other areas. Honor's midranger still drags behind the competition in terms of raw performance, launches with outdated Android and judging by its predecessor, an update to Android 13 probably won't arrive this year. It has no stereo speakers, ships without a charger, supports only 40W charging (down from Magic4 Lite's 66W), camera quality is far behind the competition, still can't shoot 4K videos and we've seen more premium builds from the competition. Excellent battery life and a great display are the only things going for the Magic5 Lite and that just isn't enough.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 64%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
Honor’s affordable mid-ranger is one of the most attractive phones in its class, with a flagship-esque look and feel. Its OLED display and epic battery life are also praiseworthy. Performance and camera output is merely ordinary, however, and the lack of a bundled charging brick feels like a bit of an oversight.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Expert Reviews EN→DE
With only a brief stumble in the camera department, the Honor Magic 5 Lite emerges as a fairly well-rounded, affordable phone. The display and battery life are both fantastic, with the only snag on the latter being that there’s no fast charging plug included in the box. Given that it’s stuck at 128GB a microSD slot wouldn’t go amiss, but otherwise, the Honor Magic 5 Lite hits the most important points in this price range. It takes decent photos, lasts a long time on a single charge, and looks great doing it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Stuff TV EN→DE
If good looks and a gorgeous screen sit top of your smartphone wish list, the Honor Magic 5 Lite is sure to please. It has styling that can shame many pricier phones, and the build quality to match. Add in a beefy battery and a decent (though not spectacular) main camera, and you’re getting a lot of phone for your cash. The secondary snappers don’t add much value, though. The Pixel 6a remains our cut-price pick for photographers, and Honor can’t match Google’s five years of updates and security patches. Performance is merely OK, too: mobile gamers demanding high frame rates might be better served by the Nothing Phone 1. But if you spend more time in Chrome than Call of Duty, and want to go as long as possible between trips to a plug socket, this could still be a winner.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Honor Magic5 Lite reached the top of our battery ranking, with strong showings in autonomy, charging and efficiency. Its autonomy was one of the best we’ve tested so far with more than 3 days when used moderately. Autonomy in intense usage also was impressive at nearly 2 full days, and among the best we’ve seen. When testing all use cases separately, the Magic5 Lite showed excellent autonomy, especially in video streaming and gaming. The autonomy during outdoor testing was excellent, too. The phone’s battery gauge, however, was inaccurate and proved to be the device’s major weak point in the user experience. When the display showed the battery at 20%, the true capacity was actually around 16%. The device would also shut down automatically at 1%. The charging experience was quite good, with the 40W charger taking 1 hour and 51 minutes to fully replenish the battery. A quick 5-minute charge provided a good 6 hours of autonomy on average. However, the time between 100% displayed on the screen and the true full charge was long at 36 minutes. In terms of efficiency, the device’s charge efficiency tipped to just below our database average, its discharge currents were very low across almost all use cases, meaning that the device is well-optimized. When compared with devices from the same price range ($200 – $399), the Honor Magic5 Lite came out on top with the best score so far. The autonomy and efficiency scores were excellent, the first time one device achieved top scores in both areas in this segment. The charging score was great and among the top charging performers in this segment with a 40W charger. But it was far behind its predecessor, the Magic 4 Lite, which went up to 66W.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.02.2023
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; large battery capacity; elegant design; support 5G; 8GB RAM; 256GB ROM. Negative: No Wifi AX; no charger included; no headphone jack; mono speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 10.03.2024
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; large battery capacity; elegant design; support 5G. Negative: No charger included; without Wifi AX; no headphone jack; mono speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 10.11.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; long battery life; elegant design; support 5G. Negative: Without Wifi AX; no charger included; no headphone jack; mono speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 18.10.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Great display; large battery capacity; attractive design; support 5G. Negative: No Wifi AX; no charger included; no headphone jack; mono speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 07.08.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Nice display; large battery capacity; elegant design; support 5G. Negative: No Wifi AX; no charger included; no headphone jack; mono speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 15.06.2023
Quelle: Tuexperto ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; long battery life; NFC chip; great main camera; good price; big screen; slim size; light weight.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.02.2023
Quelle: Zona Movilidad ES→DE
Positive: Long battery life; nice display; decent processor; good cameras; low price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 21.02.2023
Quelle: HDblog.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72% Ausstattung: 79%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 21.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 86% Mobilität: 97% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Batista70Phone IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: Everyeye.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Tutto Android IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 21.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 78% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 92%
Quelle: Cellulare Magazine IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 21.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Evo smart IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→DE
Positive: Light weight; nice display; big screen; great cameras; long battery life; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.02.2023
Quelle: Techprincess IT IT→DE
Positive: Excellent battery life; beautiful display; attractive design. Negative: Average gaming performance; poor macro cameras; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.02.2023
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.07.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.06.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.05.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.05.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 60% Ergonomie: 60%
Quelle: Les Mobiles FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 28.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: CNet France FR→DE
Positive: Good price; modern design; slim size; light weight; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.02.2023
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Positive: Big screen; nice display; very long battery life; compact size; light weight; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.02.2023
Quelle: Mobileworld 24 PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.08.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 81% Mobilität: 71% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.08.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.06.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Co Nowego PL→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; nice cameras; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 08.07.2023
Quelle: GSM Online PL→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; long battery life; nice display. Negative: Mono speakers; poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.06.2023
Quelle: DGL.ru RU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.03.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: MobilArena HU HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.03.2023
Bewertung: Preis: 40% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; decent cameras; good autonomy; attractive price. Negative: Mediocre photo sensor; old interface.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.02.2023
Kommentar
Qualcomm Adreno 619: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 750 SoC. Die Performance ist deutlich besser als der alte Adreno 612.
Diese Karten können nur sehr alte und sehr anspruchslose 3D Spiele flüssig darstellen. Anwendungen wie Office, Internet surfen, Bildbearbeitung oder (SD) Videoschnitt sind jedoch ohne große Einschränkungen möglich.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
SD 695 5G: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo 660 Kernen (zwei ARM Cortex-A78 basierte Kerne mit bis 2,2 GHz und 6 ARM Cortex-A55 mit bis zu 1,7 GHz) und einem X51 5G Modem. » Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
6.67": Es handelt sich um ein kleines Display-Format für Smartphones. Man sollte nicht stark fehlsichtig sein und man wird wenig Details am Bildschirm sehen und nur eine kleine Auflösung zur Verfügung haben. Dafür sollte das Gerät klein und handlich sein, gut transportierbar.» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.
0.175 kg:
In diese Gewichtsklasse fallen die meisten Smartphones und nur vereinzelt Tablets. Nur wenige Smartphones sind schwerer und eher als Tablets anzusehen.
Honor: 2014 gründete Huawei die Tochtermarke Honor unter der bestimmte Smartphone-Linien vertrieben werden. Gelegentlich werden die Produkte auch unter der Bezeichnung Huawei Honor geführt.
Der Marktanteil von Honor-Produkten ist überschaubar, aber es gibt einige Testberichte für Honor Smartphones mit durchschnittliche Bewertungen (2016).
77.63%: Weltbewegend ist diese Bewertung nicht. Diese Bewertung muss man eigentlich als unterdurchschnittlich ansehen, denn es gibt etwa ebenso mehr Geräte mit schlechtere Beurteilungen als Besseren. Eine Kaufempfehlung kann man nur mit viel Wohlwollen darin sehen, es sei denn es handelt sich um Websites, die generell streng urteilen.
» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.