Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa vs AMD Turion II M500

Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa

► remove from comparison

Der Samsung Exynos 9 8890 Octa ist ein System on a Chip (SoC) für Smartphones und Tablets. Er wurde Anfang 2017 von Samsung vorgestellt und wurde im Samsung Galaxy S8 und S8 Plus erstmals verbaut. Er bietet vier Samsung M1 Kerne und vier Cortex-A53 Stromsparkerne und wird als einer der ersten SoCs in 10nm FinFET bei Samsung gefertigt. Als Grafikkarte wird die ARM Mali-G71 MP20 integriert. Weiters unterstützt der SoC Cat.16 5CA 1 Gbps (DL) bzw. Cat.13 2CA 150 MBps (UL) LTE Modem. Die integrierte Videoengine unterstützt 4K UHD 120 fps H.265/H.264 und VP9 Aufnahme und Abspielen mit Hardwareunterstützung.

AMD Turion II M500

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Turion II Ultra M500 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkern Prozessor von AMD. Er basiert auf den Caspian getauften Kern, welcher wahrscheinlich (teilweise) auf die K10 Architektur basiert. Jedoch bietet er im Vergleich zu den Ultra CPUs nur 1MB shared Level 2 Cache. In dem Prozessor integriert ist ein DDR2 Speicherkontroller (400 MHz).

Die Performance des M500 befindet sich nur auf Höhe eines 2 Ghz Pentium Dual Core T3200 mit ebenfalls 1MB Level 2 Cache.

show full text
ModelSamsung Exynos 8895 OctaAMD Turion II M500
CodenameMongoose / Cortex-A53Caspian
SeriesSamsung ExynosAMD Turion II
Serie: Turion II Caspian
Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Mongoose / Cortex-A53
Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa compare2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Mongoose / Cortex-A53
AMD Turion II M560 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II M540 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II M520 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II M500 « 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2300 MHz2200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 82 / 2
Technology10 nm45 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-T880MP20 GPU , 4x Mongoose (2.3), 4x Cortex-A53 big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory ControllerMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
iGPUARM Mali-G71 MP20
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.com
FSB3600
L2 Cache1 MB
TDP35 Watt
SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-Pin

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 M500 +
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 M500 +
min: 1825     avg: 1856     median: 1864.5 (11%)     max: 1869 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 M500 +
min: 3560     avg: 3592     median: 3591 (3%)     max: 3626 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 M500 +
4370 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 M500 +
2332 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 M500 +
min: 1124     avg: 1125     median: 1124.5 (13%)     max: 1125 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 M500 +
min: 34.5     avg: 34.8     median: 34.8 (7%)     max: 35.01 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 M500 +
min: 1748     avg: 1772     median: 1756 (4%)     max: 1829 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 M500 +
min: 35.6     avg: 36.1     median: 36.3 (8%)     max: 36.33 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 M500 +
min: 83     avg: 83.1     median: 83.1 (4%)     max: 83.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 M500 +
min: 1920     avg: 1929     median: 1929 (9%)     max: 1938 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 M500 +
15570 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 M500 +
13530 MFLOPS (10%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 M500 +
5.7 Points (73%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 M500 +
3493 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 20892     avg: 21755     median: 21543 (18%)     max: 22829 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2417     avg: 2469     median: 2479 (23%)     max: 2512 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1816     avg: 2227     median: 2410 (28%)     max: 2454 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1997     avg: 2013     median: 2015 (20%)     max: 2028 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6695     avg: 6717     median: 6711 (7%)     max: 6744 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1952     avg: 1970     median: 1970 (27%)     max: 1988 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6300     avg: 6337     median: 6337 (15%)     max: 6375 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5683     avg: 5768     median: 5768 (9%)     max: 5853 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1539     avg: 1541     median: 1540.5 (23%)     max: 1542 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
1208 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1899 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
11306 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
5338 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6325 Points (17%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1877     avg: 2000     median: 1887 (2%)     max: 2237 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 12941     avg: 13419     median: 13265 (11%)     max: 14050 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
min: 3407     avg: 3514     median: 3513.5 (94%)     max: 3620 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
min: 3325     avg: 3480     median: 3479.5 (77%)     max: 3634 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
min: 7270     avg: 7368     median: 7368 (97%)     max: 7466 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
43185 points (100%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 165382     avg: 170421     median: 171884 (59%)     max: 173997 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
8027 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
43027 Points (53%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
77928 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
72228 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
201210 Points (36%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
238041 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
min: 495     avg: 518     median: 527 (10%)     max: 533 min
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2647     avg: 2687     median: 2683 (14%)     max: 2730 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 4420     avg: 4508     median: 4520 (10%)     max: 4585 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5096     avg: 5220     median: 5195 (34%)     max: 5370 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5830     avg: 5983     median: 6035 (30%)     max: 6084 Points

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Turion II M500 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 26. 08:43:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8590 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 509 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1735198982s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Dec 2024 05:18:43 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8590 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 8590 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 509 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#10 got single benchmarks 509 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.033s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.033s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)