Intel Xeon E-2176M vs Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Xeon E-2176M ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Xeon E-2176M ist ein mobiler Sechskern-High-End-Prozessor für professionelle Notebooks. Im Vergleich zum Consumer Core i7-8850H , bietet der E-2176M ECC Support für den Hauptspeicher, 12 MB L3 Cache (+3 MB) und ist schneller getaktet (+100 MHz). Die sechs CPU-Kerne takten mit 2,7 - 4,4 GHz (Ein- und Zweikern Turbo) bzw maximal 4,1 GHz wenn alle 6 Kerne ausgelastet sind.
Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert. Hinter dem Spitzenmodell E-2186M ist der E-2176M die zweitschnellste Xeon-CPU.
Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Coffee Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und Coffee Lake kann nur durch die leicht verbesserte Fertigung (14nm++) und die zusätzlichen Kerne punkten. Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet.
Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der Xeon E-2176M am besten für große und schwere Notebooks.
Intel Core i9-12900H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-12900H ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im Januar 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-P Chip (für H und P-Serie) und bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 20 Threads) und takten von 2,5 bis 5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,8 - 3,8 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ ). Im Vergleich zum 12900HK bietet der 12900H keinen freien Multiplikator, aber unterstützt das volle "Enterprise" Feature-Set von vPro (Management Features).
Performance
Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-11980HK (Tiger Lake-H mit 8 Kernen) kann der 12900H in allen Bereichen punkten. Die neuen Golden Cove Kerne bieten eine leicht höhere Single Thread Performance und dank der gesamt 14 Kerne können Multi-Thread-Anwendungen deutlich beschleunigt werden. Intel gibt z.b. bei Spielen eine 13% höhere Performance an (1080p high) und bei Blender Rendering 30% weniger Renderzeit (BMW Car Demo).
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12900H sind alle 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,45 GHz.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200 und LPDDR4x-4267. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-12900H ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (115W PL2). Bei geringer Last, sollte der Stromverbrauch dank der sparsamen Gracemont Kerne sehr gut sein. Gefertigt wird der 12900H im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm).
Model Intel Xeon E-2176M Intel Core i9-12900H Series Intel Coffee Lake Intel Alder Lake-P Codename Coffee Lake-H Alder Lake-H Serie: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H Clock 2700 - 4400 MHz 1800 - 5000 MHz L1 Cache 384 KB 1.2 MB L2 Cache 1.5 MB 11.5 MB L3 Cache 12 MB 24 MB Cores / Threads 6 / 12 14 / 20 TDP 45 Watt 45 Watt Technology 14 nm 10 nm max. Temp. 100 °C 100 °C Features Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 Announced Socket BGA1744 Manufacturer ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900H
39.6 pt (65%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96 avg: 103.7 median: 104.5 (73%) max: 111 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 91% 100% 100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 371 avg: 588 median: 571 (11%) max: 734 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 69% 79% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7359 avg: 15091 median: 15906 (15%) max: 19648 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 64% 67% 56% 77% 78% 72% 81% 84% 85% 81% 100% 96% 87% 92% 84%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1634 avg: 1825 median: 1863 (79%) max: 1921 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 91% 93% 95% 97% 100% 95% 99% 100% 89% 97% 89% 99% 100% 97% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 624 avg: 706 median: 715 (79%) max: 738 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 91% 93% 95% 97% 100% 94% 99% 100% 92% 97% 98% 100% 100% 99% 99%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2681 avg: 5696 median: 6053 (15%) max: 7471 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 65% 61% 57% 77% 73% 72% 82% 86% 81% 81% 100% 96% 87% 83% 91%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 987 avg: 1067 median: 1095 (7%) max: 1118 Points
min: 1395 avg: 2456 median: 2586 (16%) max: 3077 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 59% 76% 70% 77% 92% 77% 80% 85% 87% 85% 99% 96% 90% 100% 90%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 169 avg: 181.7 median: 187 (54%) max: 189 Points
min: 235 avg: 261.9 median: 265 (77%) max: 277 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 84% 90% 91% 96% 100% 93% 98% 100% 92% 95% 98% 100% 99% 100% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.32 avg: 11.3 median: 12.3 (16%) max: 12.4 Points
min: 12.08 avg: 23.6 median: 25.3 (33%) max: 32.77 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 48% 64% 78% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.99 avg: 2.1 median: 2 (50%) max: 2.12 Points
min: 2.83 avg: 3 median: 3 (74%) max: 3.3 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 75% 91% 92% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6928 avg: 7681 median: 6973 (42%) max: 9142 Points
min: 7952 avg: 8475 median: 8235 (50%) max: 9498 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 83% 84% 92% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 31923 avg: 35912 median: 32132 (23%) max: 43681 Points
min: 24313 avg: 43425 median: 47767 (35%) max: 60567 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 60% 59% 79% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 48178 avg: 66910 median: 70976.5 (49%) max: 77409 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 86% 96% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12846 avg: 13385 median: 13227.5 (16%) max: 14567 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 94% 96% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 147 avg: 163.3 median: 163.3 (2%) max: 179.6 s
min: 187.176 avg: 206.8 median: 197.8 (2%) max: 265.116 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 100% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.909 avg: 5.3 median: 5.3 (1%) max: 5.77 s
min: 3.421 avg: 4.1 median: 4 (1%) max: 5.062 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 100% 100%
min: 3947 avg: 4625 median: 4624.5 (7%) max: 5302 Points
min: 7620 avg: 8202 median: 7937 (13%) max: 9328 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 70% 85% 90% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 34684 avg: 60674 median: 64899 (37%) max: 76677 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 70% 70% 63% 77% 86% 77% 87% 90% 93% 88% 88% 100% 88% 95% 95%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5302 avg: 5845 median: 5881 (70%) max: 6289 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 92% 89% 95% 95% 98% 92% 90% 95% 94% 100% 96% 100% 97% 96% 94%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 58.2 avg: 63.1 median: 63.1 (22%) max: 67.9 fps
min: 67.5 avg: 105.8 median: 111.4 (39%) max: 126.7 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 66% 73% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 195.8 avg: 203.6 median: 203.6 (47%) max: 211.3 fps
min: 225 avg: 266.6 median: 263.3 (61%) max: 317 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 76% 87% 100%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.7 fps (15%)
min: 8.05 avg: 17 median: 17.7 (31%) max: 22.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 62% 61% 56% 75% 79% 73% 86% 89% 88% 87% 97% 94% 88% 100% 94%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.601 avg: 0.7 median: 0.7 (21%) max: 0.756 GB/s
min: 0.864 avg: 1.1 median: 1 (30%) max: 1.4 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 60% 79% 79% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1 avg: 1.1 median: 1.1 (19%) max: 1.2 GB/s
min: 1.5 avg: 1.8 median: 1.9 (33%) max: 2.1 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 72% 93% 100% 83%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 6.1 avg: 6.9 median: 6.9 (18%) max: 7.6 GB/s
min: 8.6 avg: 10.5 median: 10.3 (27%) max: 12.8 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 67% 90% 100% 78%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 273 avg: 426 median: 377 (5%) max: 850 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 140 W 100% 102% 100% 102% 103% 103% 103% 103% 104% 104% 103%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 465.8 avg: 510 median: 509.9 (4%) max: 554 Seconds
min: 160 avg: 232.6 median: 210 (1%) max: 451 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 100% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4218 avg: 0.5 median: 0.4 (10%) max: 0.506 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 100% 100% 100% 101% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7203 avg: 9007 median: 9757 (21%) max: 10061 Points
min: 10122 avg: 13153 median: 13453 (29%) max: 14655 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 74% 97% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.508 avg: 8.6 median: 8.6 (2%) max: 8.69 s
min: 7.3 avg: 7.7 median: 7.5 (2%) max: 8.329 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.78 avg: 19 median: 19 (1%) max: 19.26 s
min: 16.373 avg: 17.3 median: 17.2 (1%) max: 18.439 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 475.2 avg: 477 median: 477 (2%) max: 478.8 s
min: 385.4 avg: 410.8 median: 398.6 (2%) max: 474.148 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 38520 avg: 39431 median: 39431 (35%) max: 40342 Points
min: 33640 avg: 52620 median: 53621 (47%) max: 62706 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 72% 89% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10234 avg: 11628 median: 11727 (32%) max: 12923 Points
min: 10552 avg: 21220 median: 22093 (60%) max: 26126 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 70% 90% 69% 79% 100% 81% 100% 94% 91% 93% 88% 88% 82% 96% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 30521 avg: 44313 median: 44313 (36%) max: 58105 Points
min: 70655 avg: 87893 median: 91477 (74%) max: 103016 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 110 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 65% 77% 92% 95% 100% 89%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 30553 avg: 43412 median: 43412 (35%) max: 56271 Points
min: 71651 avg: 89380 median: 91745 (74%) max: 103757 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 110 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 63% 84% 92% 93% 100% 88%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 59124 avg: 59647 median: 59646.5 (50%) max: 60169 Points
min: 81857 avg: 89973 median: 89999 (76%) max: 100472 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W TDP 135 W 74% 89% 94% 87% 91% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5617 avg: 8399 median: 9331 (24%) max: 10250 Points
min: 9262 avg: 17871 median: 19114 (48%) max: 22123 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 59% 76% 74% 87% 82% 93% 97% 91% 94% 99% 100% 82% 97% 91%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 11097 avg: 13737 median: 14418 (26%) max: 15696 Points
min: 9703 avg: 25476 median: 26686 (48%) max: 31176 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 66% 88% 71% 86% 95% 82% 100% 92% 86% 31% 98% 96% 85% 89% 92%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3916 avg: 4729 median: 4728.5 (20%) max: 5541 Points
min: 5062 avg: 11513 median: 11941 (50%) max: 14424 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 62% 86% 67% 80% 100% 75% 92% 94% 87% 91% 88% 97% 83% 87% 92%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1893 avg: 2340 median: 2368.5 (64%) max: 2582 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 86% 100% 98%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 9258 avg: 10349 median: 10229.5 (40%) max: 12044 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 83% 87% 100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1631 avg: 1797 median: 1820 (72%) max: 1892 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 92% 95% 94% 95% 100% 93% 98% 96% 96% 97% 91% 99% 98% 98% 98%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8519 avg: 11903 median: 12233.5 (22%) max: 14376 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 74% 86% 69% 80% 96% 83% 91% 89% 95% 89% 80% 100% 86% 96% 97%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1553 avg: 1695 median: 1710 (7%) max: 1838 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 69 W TDP 98 W 93% 97% 95% 92% 100% 93%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8374 avg: 10525 median: 9892 (31%) max: 12717 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 69 W TDP 98 W 73% 96% 77% 88% 100% 89%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4077 avg: 4660 median: 4660 (47%) max: 5243 Points
min: 7191 avg: 7533 median: 7650 (76%) max: 8015 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 83% 100% 97%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19388 avg: 20690 median: 20689.5 (23%) max: 21991 Points
min: 30682 avg: 36787 median: 36900 (40%) max: 41134 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 71% 92% 100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1048 avg: 1054 median: 1054 (1%) max: 1060 ms
min: 490 avg: 520 median: 507.5 (1%) max: 608 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
76.2 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 35521 avg: 36102 median: 36101.5 (32%) max: 36682 Points
min: 84027 avg: 87439 median: 86645 (76%) max: 92438 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 39% 94% 91% 100% 93%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 239 avg: 261.4 median: 264 (76%) max: 279 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 140 W 89% 96% 95% 92% 88% 100% 95% 98% 92% 98%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 263 avg: 297.4 median: 296.5 (62%) max: 332 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 87% 92% 88% 87% 93% 89% 100% 89% 92% 88% 86% 95% 84% 91% 89%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1515 avg: 1842 median: 1860 (71%) max: 2108 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 79% 85% 88% 86% 100% 87% 94% 85% 89% 80% 90% 97% 93%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 52 avg: 107.9 median: 100.2 (17%) max: 180 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 118% 127% 125% 112% 117% 121% 114% 105% 110% 109% 100% 106% 116% 107% 103%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
88.9 Watt (16%)
min: 74.6 avg: 126.2 median: 120.7 (22%) max: 222 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 135% 137% 142% 129% 137% 141% 127% 128% 127% 130% 100% 119% 132% 120% 120%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.05 avg: 28.5 median: 26.5 (18%) max: 96.8 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 110 W TDP 140 W 100% 134% 115% 125% 142% 135% 120% 107% 119%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.99 avg: 18.1 median: 14.8 (16%) max: 34.3 Watt
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 100% 125% 119% 104%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.6 Points per Watt (9%)
min: 13.6 avg: 20 median: 19.4 (14%) max: 27.5 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 59% 85% 91% 68% 100% 87% 66% 73% 77% 50% 69% 86% 79% 64%
Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E-2176M → 100% n=32 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900H → 169% n=32
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 20. 01:52:40
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9904 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 14043 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726789960s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:16:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9904 +0.001s ... 0.006s
#8 got single benchmarks 9904 +0.006s ... 0.012s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14043 +0.004s ... 0.016s
#10 got single benchmarks 14043 +0.036s ... 0.052s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.063s ... 0.115s
#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.118s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte