Crosscall Stellar-X5

Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Preisvergleich

Testberichte für das Crosscall Stellar-X5

Crosscall Stellar-X5 Battery test
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Crosscall Stellar-X5 showed an average overall battery performance with good autonomy, and decent efficiency, but a poor charging experience. When used moderately, the Stellar-X5 managed to last more than two and a half days, which is above average in our database. The Stellar-X5 performed well during our typical usage scenario, but it struggled during our tests when settings such as screen brightness were calibrated. The Stellar-X5’s charging experience was quite slow, with the 20W charger never delivering above 18W. Using a wired charger, the device took more than 3 hours to reach a full charge. A quick 5-minute battery top-up recovered on average a bit more than 2 hours and 30 minutes of autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.09.2024

Crosscall Stellar-X5 Camera test
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Crosscall Stellar-X5 is the French brand’s entry into the Ultra-premium realm, with a sleeker look and feel as well as better camera specifications than prior models in an aim to bridge the gap between the rugged work phone and the personal phone. The higher-resolution sensor and a better chipset than the previously tested Action-X5 indeed resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of our image quality evaluation. The Stellar-X5’s camera score also improved considerably thanks to images that were consistently well exposed and that showed an extended dynamic range. In addition, the camera has an efficient zero shutter lag capability in most tested conditions, meaning the user is likely to capture the intended moment, particularly fast-action scenarios like sports.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.06.2024

Crosscall Stellar-X5 Display test
Quelle: DxOMark EN→DE
The Crosscall Stellar-X5’s screen provided a very uneven performance in our Display protocol, with a screen experience that was affected by a pinkish cast in all conditions. Although the Stellar-X5’s display luminance and contrast levels were able to match most ultra-premium phones in indoor conditions, the device’s display was still difficult to read, especially in bright outdoor environments. In complete darkness, the screen’s luminance remained much too bright to offer a comfortable viewing experience. Watching HDR10 video was also a mixed experience. Although there were no frame drops, it was sometimes hard to make out the dark tones in the video content due to the lack of brightness.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.06.2024

Kommentar

Qualcomm Adreno 710: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SoC. Laut Qualcomm um 2x schneller als die alte Adreno 644 im Snapdragon 7 Gen 1.

Einige nicht anspruchsvolle aktuelle Spiele können mit geringen Details noch flüssig gespielt werden. Für Office und Video natürlich ausreichende Leistungsreserven.

» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.

SD 6 Gen 1: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo Kernen (4x ARM Cortex A78 2,2 GHz Performance-Cluster, 4x ARM Cortex A55 mit 1,8 Effizienz-Cluster) und einem X62 5G Modem (bis zu 2900 Mbps Download). Der Chip wird im modernen 4nm Prozess gefertigt.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .

6.58": Es handelt sich um ein kleines Display-Format für Smartphones. Man sollte nicht stark fehlsichtig sein und man wird wenig Details am Bildschirm sehen und nur eine kleine Auflösung zur Verfügung haben. Dafür sollte das Gerät klein und handlich sein, gut transportierbar.» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.

0.249 kg:

» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.

Geräte anderer Hersteller

Geräte eines anderen Herstellers und/oder mit einer anderen CPU