Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4500 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7530U vs Intel Celeron N5095A

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

Der Intel Celeron N4500 ist ein Anfang 2021 vorgestellter Dual-Core-SoC, der hauptsächlich in preiswerten Notebooks verbaut wird. Er taktet mit 1,1 bis 2,8 GHz (Einzelkern Burst) und gehört der Jasper-Lake-Plattform an. Die Fertigung erfolgt im 10nm Prozess bei Intel (wahrscheinlich wie Ice Lake).  Neben den zwei CPU-Kernen integriert der Chip auch eine DirectX-12-fähige Grafikeinheit mit 16 EUs und einem Takt von bis zu 750 MHz, sowie einen LPDDR4(x)-Speichercontroller (Dual-Channel, 2.933 MHz, 16 GB max.). Der SoC kann nicht ausgetauscht werden, da er direkt mit dem Mainboard verlötet wird (BGA Package).

Weiterhin integriert der Chip teilweise WLAN und kann kostengünstig mit Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+) ausgestattet werden. 8 PCIe Gen3 Lanes werden vom SoC nach aussen geführt und 14 USB 2.0/3.2 und 2 SATA 6.0 Anschlüsse können verbaut werden. Das Package des SoCs misst 35 x 24 mm und ist damit deutlich größer als beim Vorgänger (25 x 24 mm).

Architektur

Die Prozessor-Architektur der Jasper Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger deutlich weiterentwickelt. Im Schnitt soll sich die Einzelkernperformance im Vergleich zu Goldmont Plus um 30% erhöhen (10 - 80% bei den SPECint und SPECfp Benchmarks).

Performance

Durch die schnellere Architektur sollte der Celeron N4500 etwas schneller sein als der alte Celeron N4020 Dual Core. Der schnellere Celeron N5100 der Jasper Lake Generation ist durch die zwei zusätzlichen CPU Kerne und die stärkere GPU aber deutlich schneller. Dadurch eignet sich der N4500 nur für anspruchslose Tätigkeiten und wenig Multitasking.

Grafik

Die integrierte UHD Graphics Grafikeinheit bietet 16 EUs (Gen. 11 Grafikkerne wie Ice Lake) welche mit 350 - 750 MHz getaktet werden. Es werden bis zu 3 Bildschirme mit 4k60 Auflösung unterstützt

Leistungsaufnahme

Der gesamte SoC wird von Intel wie der Vorgänger mit einer TDP von 6 Watt spezifiziert (SDP 4,8 Watt - Scenario Design Power). Damit kann der Chip prinzipiell rein passiv gekühlt werden, jedoch sind auch Varianten mit Lüfter möglich.

AMD Ryzen 5 7530U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7530U

Der AMD Ryzen 5 7530U ist ein Mobilprozessor für kleine und leichte Notebooks basierend auf die Cezanne Refresh Generation. Der 7530U ist Teil des zweiten "Barcelo" Refresh Anfang 2023 und bietet einen 200 MHz höheren Turbo Takt im Vergleich zum R5 5625U. Der SoC beinhaltet sechs Zen 3 Kerne (Hexa-Core CPU) welche von 2 bis zu 4,5 GHz getaktet werden (Einzelkern Turbo) und SMT / Hyperthreading (12 Threads) unterstützen. Der Chip wird im 7nm Prozess bei TSMC gefertigt und wurde Anfang 2023 vorgestellt.

Die Performance sollte nur etwas oberhalb des alten Ryzen 5 5625U liegen (wahrscheinlich hauptsächlich bei der Einzelkernperformance) und unterhalb des Ryzen 5 6600U.

Der SoC integriert neben den sechs Prozessorkernen noch eine Radeon RX Vega 7 Grafikkarte mit 7 CUs (nun nur noch Radeon Graphics genannt) und bis zu 2000 MHz Takt, einen Dual-Channel DDR4 (DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266) Speicherkontroller und 16 MB Level 3 Cache. 

Der TDP ist mit 15 Watt spezifiziert, wodurch sich die APU auch für leichte Notebooks eignet.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Celeron N4500AMD Ryzen 5 7530UIntel Celeron N5095A
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Jasper Lake
CodenameJasper LakeBarcelo-U RefreshJasper Lake
Serie: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U « 2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1100 - 2800 MHz2000 - 4500 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB3 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 26 / 124 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP6 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C95 °C
SocketBGA1338FP6BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 2000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache384 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
16.7 pt (28%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7530U
34.2 pt (56%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
83 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
455 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
709 Points (1%)
1187%
1 R5 7530U +
min: 6931     avg: 8479     median: 8418.5 (8%)     max: 9347 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
452 Points (19%)
min: 1371     avg: 1438     median: 1443 (61%)     max: 1470 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
188 Points (21%)
min: 528     avg: 561     median: 565 (63%)     max: 574 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
332 Points (1%)
min: 2833     avg: 3304     median: 3288 (8%)     max: 3655 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
171 Points (1%)
min: 1289     avg: 1447     median: 1457.5 (9%)     max: 1599 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
82 Points (24%)
min: 213     avg: 229.5     median: 230.5 (67%)     max: 237 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.1 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6954 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5266 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1270 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.2 s (10%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1076 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
5394 MIPS (3%)
min: 32204     avg: 37957     median: 37983 (22%)     max: 42364 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2853 MIPS (34%)
min: 5113     avg: 5328     median: 5339 (64%)     max: 5544 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60.6 fps (14%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
1446%
1 R5 7530U +
min: 8.17     avg: 10.3     median: 10.7 (19%)     max: 11.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 583     avg: 694     median: 674 (9%)     max: 820 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4249 Seconds (30%)
1174%
1 R5 7530U +
min: 330     avg: 377.3     median: 362 (3%)     max: 469 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
2.1 sec (46%)
min: 0.515     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.567 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2053 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1507 Points (4%)
min: 10189     avg: 11861     median: 12224 (33%)     max: 12926 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 75967     avg: 78857     median: 78857 (64%)     max: 81747 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
84092 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
87410 Points (74%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1521 Points (4%)
min: 9155     avg: 11259     median: 11233 (28%)     max: 12903 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2017 Points (4%)
min: 14264     avg: 18380     median: 19207 (34%)     max: 20296 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
504 Points (2%)
1115%
1 R5 7530U +
min: 4384     avg: 5399     median: 5619 (24%)     max: 5891 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
457 Points (12%)
min: 1913     avg: 1941     median: 1941 (52%)     max: 1969 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
662 Points (3%)
min: 6099     avg: 6500     median: 6500 (26%)     max: 6901 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (24%)     max: 598 Points
min: 1393     avg: 1464     median: 1479 (59%)     max: 1498 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
min: 5475     avg: 6121     median: 6390 (11%)     max: 6648 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1312     avg: 1377     median: 1376.5 (6%)     max: 1441 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6233     avg: 6397     median: 6396.5 (20%)     max: 6560 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
min: 614     avg: 650     median: 629 (1%)     max: 770 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24838 Points (22%)
72262 Points (63%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
91.2 Points (26%)
min: 183.4     avg: 205.6     median: 209 (60%)     max: 214 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (20%)     max: 141.3 Points
min: 244     avg: 261.5     median: 264 (55%)     max: 272 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6833 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
7404 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1029     avg: 1228     median: 1231 (47%)     max: 1336 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.7 Watt (2%)
min: 27.5     avg: 41.4     median: 41.8 (7%)     max: 52.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
9.1 Watt (2%)
min: 32.2     avg: 47.1     median: 48.2 (9%)     max: 59.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.43     avg: 5.5     median: 6 (4%)     max: 7.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.5 Watt (6%)
min: 5.25     avg: 6.5     median: 6.4 (7%)     max: 7.64 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
min: 26.7     avg: 32     median: 28.8 (21%)     max: 40.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7530U → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 22. 09:29:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14958 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726990188s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Sep 2024 05:16:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#9 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14958 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#11 got single benchmarks 14958 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0s ... 0.01s

#13 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.01s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.032s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.032s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)