Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Celeron N5095A

Intel Celeron N4500

Intel Celeron N4500

Der Intel Celeron N4500 ist ein Anfang 2021 vorgestellter Dual-Core-SoC, der hauptsächlich in preiswerten Notebooks verbaut wird. Er taktet mit 1,1 bis 2,8 GHz (Einzelkern Burst) und gehört der Jasper-Lake-Plattform an. Die Fertigung erfolgt im 10nm Prozess bei Intel (wahrscheinlich wie Ice Lake).  Neben den zwei CPU-Kernen integriert der Chip auch eine DirectX-12-fähige Grafikeinheit mit 16 EUs und einem Takt von bis zu 750 MHz, sowie einen LPDDR4(x)-Speichercontroller (Dual-Channel, 2.933 MHz, 16 GB max.). Der SoC kann nicht ausgetauscht werden, da er direkt mit dem Mainboard verlötet wird (BGA Package).

Weiterhin integriert der Chip teilweise WLAN und kann kostengünstig mit Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+) ausgestattet werden. 8 PCIe Gen3 Lanes werden vom SoC nach aussen geführt und 14 USB 2.0/3.2 und 2 SATA 6.0 Anschlüsse können verbaut werden. Das Package des SoCs misst 35 x 24 mm und ist damit deutlich größer als beim Vorgänger (25 x 24 mm).

Architektur

Die Prozessor-Architektur der Jasper Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger deutlich weiterentwickelt. Im Schnitt soll sich die Einzelkernperformance im Vergleich zu Goldmont Plus um 30% erhöhen (10 - 80% bei den SPECint und SPECfp Benchmarks).

Performance

Durch die schnellere Architektur sollte der Celeron N4500 etwas schneller sein als der alte Celeron N4020 Dual Core. Der schnellere Celeron N5100 der Jasper Lake Generation ist durch die zwei zusätzlichen CPU Kerne und die stärkere GPU aber deutlich schneller. Dadurch eignet sich der N4500 nur für anspruchslose Tätigkeiten und wenig Multitasking.

Grafik

Die integrierte UHD Graphics Grafikeinheit bietet 16 EUs (Gen. 11 Grafikkerne wie Ice Lake) welche mit 350 - 750 MHz getaktet werden. Es werden bis zu 3 Bildschirme mit 4k60 Auflösung unterstützt

Leistungsaufnahme

Der gesamte SoC wird von Intel wie der Vorgänger mit einer TDP von 6 Watt spezifiziert (SDP 4,8 Watt - Scenario Design Power). Damit kann der Chip prinzipiell rein passiv gekühlt werden, jedoch sind auch Varianten mit Lüfter möglich.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Celeron N4500Intel Celeron N5095A
CodenameJasper LakeJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Jasper Lake
Serie: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1100 - 2800 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP6 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1338BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
16.6 pt (28%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
709 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
452 Points (19%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
188 Points (21%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
332 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
171 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
82 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.1 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6954 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5266 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1270 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.2 s (10%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1076 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
5394 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2853 MIPS (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60.6 fps (14%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4249 Seconds (30%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
2.1 sec (46%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2053 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1507 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1521 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2017 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
504 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
457 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
662 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (23%)     max: 598 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24838 Points (21%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
91.2 Points (26%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (17%)     max: 141.3 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6833 Points (3%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
7404 Points (27%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
9.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.5 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 21. 18:22:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734801727s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:18:43 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.009s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.04s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.042s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)