Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619

Qualcomm Adreno 685

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 685

Die Qualcomm Adreno 685 ist eine im Microsoft SQ1 integrierte Grafikeinheit für Windows-Tablets (Microsoft Surface X). Technisch eine Adreno 680 wie im Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx ARM-SoC, jedoch wahrscheinlich höher getaktet. Microsoft gibt 2 Tflops theoretische Leistung an, versus 1.8 bei der Adreno 680 im 8cx.

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

Die Qualcomm Adreno 619 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hauptsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert. 

Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 685Qualcomm Adreno 619
Adreno 600 Serie
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryjaja
APIDirectX 12DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
Stromverbrauch7 Watt
Herstellungsprozess7 nm8 nm
Erscheinungsdatum06.12.2018 15.12.2015
ArchitekturAdreno 600
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
CPU in Adreno 685GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Microsoft SQ18 x 3000 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 38 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (15%)     max: 3107 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (8%)     max: 3008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 2825     avg: 3855     median: 3993.5 (35%)     max: 4156 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3647     avg: 4097     median: 4145 (25%)     max: 4414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 1757     avg: 2728     median: 2812.5 (14%)     max: 2983 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1593     avg: 2593     median: 2655.5 (9%)     max: 2845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 635     avg: 1119     median: 1196 (1%)     max: 1578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 189     avg: 329.9     median: 351 (0%)     max: 410 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1968 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1927 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 685
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
373 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.9     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 17     avg: 20.2     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 26     avg: 32.5     median: 34 (1%)     max: 36 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
31.7 fps (2%)
min: 33     avg: 45.5     median: 46 (3%)     max: 68 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
167.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55     avg: 88.2     median: 91 (1%)     max: 100 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 65241     avg: 91752     median: 97328 (12%)     max: 106719 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 19.62     avg: 27.1     median: 26.9 (0%)     max: 31.27 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2292 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8763     avg: 68002     median: 26723 (9%)     max: 291780 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3274     avg: 20485     median: 22822.5 (38%)     max: 28746 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.69     avg: 3.7     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.31 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 685 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 100% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 619:
29.7 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 619:
29.4 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
Adreno 619:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 619:
20 29.8 45 54 ~ 37 fps
med.
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
Adreno 619:
20 28 29.3 30 ~ 27 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 619:
29 38.7 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
med.
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
Adreno 619:
28 29.3 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 619:
90  fps
Qualcomm Adreno 619lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift3060
Genshin Impact373627
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile394031
Dead Trigger 290
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
5


2


2
4
1
1







Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 13. 05:13:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9954 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731471190s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:17:12 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9954 +0.019s ... 0.022s

#9 got single benchmarks 9954 +0.003s ... 0.026s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0s ... 0.026s

#11 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.046s ... 0.072s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.088s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.088s

#15 Got 119 rows for game benchmarks. +0.021s ... 0.109s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.109s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.11s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.113s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.113s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.115s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)