Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Qualcomm Adreno 642 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 642 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2021 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten Geräten der oberen Mittelklasse eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 642 GPU eine um 50% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 620 im Snapdragon 768G. Dies wird auch durch den schnellen Speicherkontroller mit LPDDR4X-4200-Unterstützung ermöglicht.
Die Grafikkarte unterstützt OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 und Vulkan 1.1.
Als "G"-Chip unterstützt der 780G Snapdragon Elite Gaming mit updatebaren GPU Treibern.
Qualcomm Adreno 619 ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 619 ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G verbaute Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets (hauptsächlich Android basiert). Sie ist in der unteren Mittelklasse positioniert.
Die Adreno 600 Serie unterstützt laut Wikipedia Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 Full und DirectX 11_1. Der Chip sollte daher ein abgespeckter Adreno 630 (weniger Shader?) sein.
Qualcomm Adreno 642L ► remove from comparison
Die Qualcomm Adreno 642L ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G eingesetzte, ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2021 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten Geräten der oberen Mittelklasse eingesetzt.
Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 642L GPU eine um 40% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 620 im Snapdragon 768G (vs 50% im Adreno 642). Dies wird auch durch den schnellen Speicherkontroller mit LPDDR5-Unterstützung ermöglicht.
Für Gaming unterstützt der Chip Variable Rate Shading und Qualcomm Game Quick Touch.
Die Grafikkarte unterstützt OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 und Vulkan 1.1.
Qualcomm Adreno 642 Qualcomm Adreno 619 Qualcomm Adreno 642L Adreno 600 Serie Shared Memory ja ja ja API OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan OpenGL ES 3.2 Herstellungsprozess 5 nm 8 nm 6 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Erscheinungsdatum 07.05.2021 15.12.2015 07.05.2021 Architektur Adreno 600
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 642L
0.4 pt (1%)
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 54788 avg: 55662 median: 55911 (6%) max: 56286 Points
min: 46148 avg: 74921 median: 88482 (9%) max: 90133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
30747 Points (4%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go SD 7c+ Gen 3 Adreno 642L 4 GB 30747
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
4790 Points (5%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go SD 7c+ Gen 3 Adreno 642L 4 GB 4790
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5577 Points (1%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go SD 7c+ Gen 3 Adreno 642L 4 GB 5577
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
782 Points (1%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go SD 7c+ Gen 3 Adreno 642L 4 GB 782
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
832 Points (1%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go SD 7c+ Gen 3 Adreno 642L 4 GB 832
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
37738 Points (4%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go SD 7c+ Gen 3 Adreno 642L 4 GB 37738
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5587 Points (24%)
min: 3602 avg: 4041 median: 4118 (18%) max: 4286 Points
min: 6398 avg: 6666 median: 6638 (29%) max: 7281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
8380 Points (18%)
min: 3817 avg: 4280 median: 4298 (9%) max: 4573 Points
min: 7199 avg: 7627 median: 7536 (17%) max: 8605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
4478 Points (22%)
min: 2536 avg: 2906 median: 2981.5 (15%) max: 3107 Points
min: 5032 avg: 5413 median: 5393.5 (27%) max: 5763 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
6148 Points (18%)
min: 2412 avg: 2788 median: 2834 (8%) max: 3008 Points
min: 5103 avg: 5654 median: 5612 (17%) max: 6240 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
6989 Points (62%)
min: 2825 avg: 3855 median: 3993.5 (35%) max: 4156 Points
min: 6320 avg: 6409 median: 6358 (56%) max: 6798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
8588 Points (52%)
min: 3647 avg: 4097 median: 4145 (25%) max: 4414 Points
min: 7138 avg: 7328 median: 7238 (43%) max: 8182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
5098 Points (25%)
min: 1757 avg: 2728 median: 2812.5 (14%) max: 2983 Points
min: 4967 avg: 5076 median: 5031.5 (25%) max: 5385 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
6087 Points (20%)
min: 1593 avg: 2593 median: 2655.5 (9%) max: 2845 Points
min: 5134 avg: 5267 median: 5205 (17%) max: 5807 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
3212 Points (2%)
min: 635 avg: 1119 median: 1196 (1%) max: 1578 Points
min: 2321 avg: 2517 median: 2493.5 (1%) max: 2831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
786 Points (1%)
min: 189 avg: 329.9 median: 351 (0%) max: 410 Points
min: 681 avg: 696 median: 687.5 (1%) max: 768 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1038 Points (1%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go SD 7c+ Gen 3 Adreno 642L 4 GB 1038
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
968 Points (1%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go SD 7c+ Gen 3 Adreno 642L 4 GB 968
Cinebench R15 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
7.2 fps (0%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go SD 7c+ Gen 3 Adreno 642L 4 GB 7.15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 642L Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go SD 7c+ Gen 3 Adreno 642L 4 GB 98
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.9 avg: 3.5 median: 3.5 (1%) max: 4 fps
min: 5.9 avg: 6.2 median: 6.1 (2%) max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
18 fps (3%)
min: 3.3 avg: 7.4 median: 7.7 (1%) max: 8.9 fps
min: 13 avg: 13.6 median: 13.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
50 fps (4%)
min: 17 avg: 20.2 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
min: 34 avg: 36.4 median: 36 (3%) max: 40 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
40 fps (5%)
min: 16 avg: 18.5 median: 19 (2%) max: 21 fps
min: 33 avg: 33.7 median: 33 (4%) max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
65 fps (1%)
min: 26 avg: 32.5 median: 34 (1%) max: 36 fps
min: 56 avg: 57.7 median: 57 (1%) max: 64 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
90 fps (5%)
min: 33 avg: 45.5 median: 46 (3%) max: 68 fps
min: 77 avg: 79.1 median: 78 (5%) max: 89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + Qualcomm Adreno 642 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
153 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55 avg: 88.2 median: 91 (1%) max: 100 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
min: 81 avg: 131.6 median: 133 (1%) max: 148 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
162946 Points (20%)
min: 65241 avg: 91752 median: 97328 (12%) max: 106719 Points
min: 135972 avg: 157798 median: 157454 (20%) max: 175807 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
48 fps (0%)
min: 19.62 avg: 27.1 median: 26.9 (0%) max: 31.27 fps
min: 45.96 avg: 49.6 median: 46.9 (0%) max: 54.4 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 1363 avg: 1377 median: 1377.5 (0%) max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 1119 avg: 1168 median: 1160 (0%) max: 1231 Points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
42 Samples/s (0%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go SD 7c+ Gen 3 Adreno 642L 4 GB 42
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
53 Samples/s (0%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go SD 7c+ Gen 3 Adreno 642L 4 GB 53
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
944 Points (1%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go SD 7c+ Gen 3 Adreno 642L 4 GB 944
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8763 avg: 68002 median: 26723 (9%) max: 291780 Points
min: 23666 avg: 31803 median: 30994 (11%) max: 38436 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3274 avg: 20485 median: 22822.5 (38%) max: 28746 Points
min: 26134 avg: 36660 median: 40236 (67%) max: 43000 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.69 avg: 3.7 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 7.31 Watt
min: 0 avg: 4.3 median: 4 (2%) max: 9.27 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100% n=18 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 52% n=18 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 91% n=18
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
Adreno 619:
29.7 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
25 fps, P1:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Nokia G42 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
Adreno 619:
29.4 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
21 fps, P1:
22.28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Nokia G42 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
26 fps, max:
32 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
Adreno 619:
30 [X] Honor Magic4 Lite 3.2.0.5531
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
fps
Adreno 619:
60 [X] Sony Xperia 10 V 4.3.0.6993
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
56 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 642L:
61 [X] Xiaomi 12 Lite 3.4.0.5930
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 619:
20 [X] Motorola Moto G34 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
max:
28 fps
29.8 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
15 fps, P1:
21.4 fps, max:
39 fps
45 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
25 fps, max:
60 fps
54 ~ 37 fps
Adreno 619:
36 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
29 fps, max:
47 fps
fps
Adreno 619:
20 [X] Motorola Moto G34 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
max:
20 fps
28 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
18 fps, max:
41 fps
29.3 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
11 fps, P1:
21.4 fps, max:
30 fps
30 ~ 27 fps
200%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Nokia G42 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
59 60 60 [X] Nokia X20 1.59.7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
55 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Nokia X10 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
51 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Nokia XR20 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Realme 9 Pro 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Nokia X30 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
55 fps, max:
61 fps
60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
68%
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
52%
Adreno 619:
28 [X] Nokia X20 1.3.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
13 fps, max:
31 fps
29.3 [X] Motorola Moto G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 2GHz
Adreno 619
min:
18 fps, P1:
23.04 fps, max:
30 fps
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 [X] Nokia X10 1.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Nokia XR20 1.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 1.8.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Realme 9 Pro 1.9.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 [X] Nokia X30 2.2.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 [X] Xiaomi Poco X5 2.6.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Nokia XR21 2.6.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Nokia G42 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
Adreno 642L:
33.7 [X] Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 2.4GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
23.3 fps, max:
-1 fps
fps
Adreno 642L:
25 [X] Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 2.4GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
20.7 fps, max:
-1 fps
fps
Adreno 642L:
14.8 [X] Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 2.4GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
13.5 fps, max:
-1 fps
fps
Adreno 642L:
13 [X] Samsung Galaxy Book2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 2.4GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
12 fps, max:
-1 fps
fps
50%
Adreno 619:
30 30 [X] Nokia X20 2.8.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
22 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 3.3.5a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
50%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
50%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 [X] Nokia X20 2.8.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
19 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 3.3.5a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
24 fps, max:
31 fps
30 ~ 30 fps
50%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 642L:
90 [X] Motorola Edge 30 2.36.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G 1.9GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
82 fps, max:
91 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 81% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 96%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 104% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 76%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 59 56 League of Legends: Wild Rift 61 Armajet 89 PUBG Mobile 58 40 38 Dota 2 Reborn 33.7 25 14.8 13 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 Subway Surfers 90 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 4 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1
Qualcomm Adreno 642 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 60 59 60 40 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 1 1 2 1
v1.28
log 14. 06:52:03
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731563523s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.011s ... 0.014s
#10 got single benchmarks 10693 +0s ... 0.015s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0s ... 0.015s
#12 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.006s ... 0.021s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.007s ... 0.028s
#14 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.009s ... 0.038s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.062s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.062s
#18 Got 178 rows for game benchmarks. +0.037s ... 0.1s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.1s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.1s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.104s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.104s
#23 return log +0s ... 0.104s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
