Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A15 Bionic vs Rockchip RK3188 vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

Apple A15 Bionic

► remove from comparison Apple A15

Der Apple A15 Bionic ist System on a Chip (SoC) von Apple, der in der iPhone 13 und iPad Mini 2021 Serie verbaut wird. Er integriert sechs 64-Bit-fähige ARM-Kerne (2 Performance Kerne mit bis zu 3,24 GHz, 4 Stromsparkerne mit bis zu 2,02 GHz). Laut Apple wurde der System Cache verdoppelt und bietet eine schnellere GPU, schnellere Neural Engine. Der Chip ist mit 15.8 Milliarden Transistoren relativ groß.

Rockchip RK3188

► remove from comparison

Der Rockchip RK3188 ist ein leistungsstarker ARM-SoC, der in erster Linie für Tablets konzipiert wurde. Er integriert vier ARM Cortex-A9 CPU-Kerne mit NEON-Erweiterung und einer Taktrate von bis zu 1,8 GHz, eine Mali-400 MP4 Grafikkarte (bis zu 600 MHz, 24 GFLOPS) und einen Speichercontroller für (LP-)DDR2/DDR3. Die CPU- und Grafik-Performance liegt dank der hohen Taktraten etwas über anderen Cortex-A9 Quad-Cores wie dem Nvidia Tegra 3 oder Samsung Exynos 4412. Möglich wird dies durch eine fortschrittliche 28-Nanometer-Fertigung. Dennoch treibt die hohe Taktfrequenz die Leistungsaufnahme in die Höhe, sodass der RK3188 kaum in kompakten Smartphones eingesetzt wird.

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

show full text
ModelApple A15 BionicRockchip RK3188WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950
SeriesApple Apple A-Series
Serie: Cortex-A9
Apple A18 Pro - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A18 - 3.8 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A15 Bionic « 2.02 - 3.23 GHz6 / 6 cores32 MB L3
Apple A12 Bionic - 2.49 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A61 GHz2 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 « 1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock2020 - 3230 MHz1800 MHz1000 MHz
L2 Cache16 MB
L3 Cache32 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 64 / 41 / 1
Transistors15800 Million
Technology5 nm28 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction Set, Machine Learning Controller, 16-Core Neural Engine, Secure Enclave, Advanced Image Signal ProcessorMali-400 MP4 (600 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory Controller (max. 2 GByte)
iGPUApple A15 GPU 5-CoreARM Mali-400 MP4 (600 MHz)ARM Mali-400 MP
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.comwww.wondermedia.com.tw

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 5828     avg: 7773     median: 7936 (6%)     max: 8887 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 5434     avg: 7724     median: 8025.5 (7%)     max: 8812 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 9142     avg: 9821     median: 9821 (8%)     max: 10500 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 A15 +
min: 1852     avg: 2027     median: 1913 (23%)     max: 2307 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 A15 +
2130 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 A15 +
2332 Points (59%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 A15 +
5661 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A15 +
min: 1590     avg: 1723     median: 1734 (68%)     max: 1755 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A15 +
min: 4559     avg: 4755     median: 4788 (9%)     max: 4914 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1316     avg: 1410     median: 1421 (3%)     max: 1493 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 476     avg: 498.7     median: 504 (10%)     max: 516 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 182     avg: 320     median: 272 (2%)     max: 506 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 326     avg: 687     median: 803 (7%)     max: 933 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1769     avg: 2044     median: 2035 (4%)     max: 2328 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 924     avg: 1123     median: 1104 (2%)     max: 1341 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1130     avg: 1275     median: 1182 (3%)     max: 1512 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 130     avg: 131.1     median: 131.1 (4%)     max: 132.1 MFLOPS
24%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 54.9     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (6%)     max: 59.4 MFLOPS
66%
1 WM8950 +
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 A15 +
min: 413.6     avg: 455.6     median: 451 (1%)     max: 507.3 ms
13698 ms (16%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 A15 +
77 ms (1%)
min: 849     avg: 1179     median: 1240 (14%)     max: 1388 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 702     avg: 986     median: 1086 (10%)     max: 1170 ms
45%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 A15 +
min: 57143     avg: 63305     median: 64026.5 (53%)     max: 65969 Points
min: 3092     avg: 3094     median: 3093.5 (3%)     max: 3095 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 A15 +
min: 188     avg: 188.3     median: 188 (53%)     max: 189 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 A15 +
min: 219     avg: 254.3     median: 250 (46%)     max: 279 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
5287 points (12%)
40%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 7505     avg: 7723     median: 7807 (51%)     max: 7856 Points
16%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 2139     avg: 14154     median: 19571 (46%)     max: 20752 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 A15 +
min: 722973     avg: 788523     median: 800415 (48%)     max: 832548 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 A15 +
min: 192891     avg: 209810     median: 209802 (57%)     max: 227638 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 179     avg: 329     median: 374 (11%)     max: 434 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 10329     avg: 11213     median: 11588 (38%)     max: 11722 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 A15 +
min: 10349     avg: 10411     median: 10410.5 (1%)     max: 10472 Points
105%
1 RK3188 +
min: 9258     avg: 10743     median: 10965 (1%)     max: 11782 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 A15 +
min: 1132     avg: 1156     median: 1145 (44%)     max: 1190 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 A15 +
min: 4.54     avg: 4.9     median: 5 (2%)     max: 5.64 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 A15 +
min: 0     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 1.415 Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple A15 Bionic → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3188 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 16. 19:58:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13825 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4137 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731783533s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13825 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#9 got single benchmarks 13825 +0.008s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 4137 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#11 got single benchmarks 4137 +0.007s ... 0.021s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.021s

#13 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.003s ... 0.024s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.042s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.042s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)