Notebookcheck Logo

Rockchip RK3188 vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

Rockchip RK3188

► remove from comparison

Der Rockchip RK3188 ist ein leistungsstarker ARM-SoC, der in erster Linie für Tablets konzipiert wurde. Er integriert vier ARM Cortex-A9 CPU-Kerne mit NEON-Erweiterung und einer Taktrate von bis zu 1,8 GHz, eine Mali-400 MP4 Grafikkarte (bis zu 600 MHz, 24 GFLOPS) und einen Speichercontroller für (LP-)DDR2/DDR3. Die CPU- und Grafik-Performance liegt dank der hohen Taktraten etwas über anderen Cortex-A9 Quad-Cores wie dem Nvidia Tegra 3 oder Samsung Exynos 4412. Möglich wird dies durch eine fortschrittliche 28-Nanometer-Fertigung. Dennoch treibt die hohe Taktfrequenz die Leistungsaufnahme in die Höhe, sodass der RK3188 kaum in kompakten Smartphones eingesetzt wird.

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

show full text
ModelRockchip RK3188WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950
Series
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9
Serie: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 « 1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1800 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 41 / 1
Technology28 nm
FeaturesMali-400 MP4 (600 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory Controller (max. 2 GByte)
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP4 (600 MHz)ARM Mali-400 MP
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.comwww.wondermedia.com.tw

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 5828     avg: 7773     median: 7936 (6%)     max: 8887 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 5434     avg: 7724     median: 8025.5 (7%)     max: 8812 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 9142     avg: 9821     median: 9821 (8%)     max: 10500 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1316     avg: 1410     median: 1421 (3%)     max: 1493 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 476     avg: 498.7     median: 504 (10%)     max: 516 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 182     avg: 320     median: 272 (2%)     max: 506 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 326     avg: 687     median: 803 (7%)     max: 933 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1769     avg: 2044     median: 2035 (4%)     max: 2328 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 924     avg: 1123     median: 1104 (2%)     max: 1341 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1130     avg: 1275     median: 1182 (3%)     max: 1512 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 130     avg: 131.1     median: 131.1 (4%)     max: 132.1 MFLOPS
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 54.9     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (6%)     max: 59.4 MFLOPS
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3188 +
13698 ms (16%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 849     avg: 1179     median: 1240 (14%)     max: 1388 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 702     avg: 986     median: 1086 (10%)     max: 1170 ms
2410 ms (23%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 3092     avg: 3094     median: 3093.5 (3%)     max: 3095 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
5287 points (12%)
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 7505     avg: 7723     median: 7807 (51%)     max: 7856 Points
1282 Points (8%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 2139     avg: 14154     median: 19571 (46%)     max: 20752 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 179     avg: 329     median: 374 (11%)     max: 434 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 10329     avg: 11213     median: 11588 (38%)     max: 11722 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 9258     avg: 10743     median: 10965 (1%)     max: 11782 Points

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3188 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 38% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 14. 18:59:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4137 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731607197s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4137 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 4137 +0.008s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.003s ... 0.015s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.026s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.029s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)